Perception & Thinking
Perception & Thinking
Perception & Thinking
THINKING
Perception
Any living organism must solve an unending series of
problems presented to it by the environment within which
it dwells. The complexity of the problems and associated
sophistication of the solutions depend on the nature and
complexity of the organism.
The study of perception deals with the question of how organisms
process and organize incoming raw sensory information in order
to:
(1) form a coherent representation or model of the world within
which the organism dwells
(2) use that representation to solve naturally occurring problems,
such as navigating, grasping, and planning.
Functions of perception
Five major functions of the perceptual system are:
(1) determining which part of the sensory environment to attend to.
(2) localizing, or determining where objects are.
(3) recognizing, or determining what objects are.
(4) abstracting the critical information from objects.
(5) keeping the appearance of objects constant, even though their retinal
images are changing. Another area of study is how our perceptual capacities
develop.
Attention:
To localize objects, we must first separate them and then organize them into
groups. Localization involves determining an object’s position in the up–down
and left–right dimensions. This is relatively easy because the required
information is part of our retinal image.
Localizing an object also requires that we know its distance from us. This form
of perception, known as depth perception, is not so easy because it’s not
available in the retinal image. We have a variety of depth cues, both
monocular and binocular, that allow us to do this. Localizing an object
sometimes requires that we know the direction in which an object is moving.
Recognition
Recognizing an object requires that the various features associated with the object
(such as shapes and colors) be correctly bound together, a process that requires
attention. Recognition of a particular object is aided by first acquiring ‘global’ aspects
of the scene; for example quickly understanding that you are looking at a kitchen
helps recognizing an ambiguous object as a loaf of bread rather than a mailbox.
There are known kinds of cells in the visual cortex that are sensitive to various kinds
of stimulus features such as orientation and position within the visual field.
Face recognition may be special, i.e., different in important respects from recognition
of other objects.
Abstraction
Deductive reasoning
According to logicians, the strongest arguments demonstrate deductive
validity, meaning that it is impossible for the conclusion of the argument to be
false if its premises are true. Consider the following example:
a If it’s raining, I’ll take an umbrella.
b It’s raining.
c Therefore, I’ll take an umbrella.
Inductive reasoning
Logical rules
Logicians have noted that an argument can be good even if it is not
deductively valid. Such arguments are inductively strong, meaning that the
conclusion is false if the premises are true.
An example of an inductively strong argument is as follows:
a. Mitch majored in accounting in college.
b. Mitch now works for an accounting firm.
c. Therefore, Mitch is an accountant.
This argument is not deductively valid (Mitch may have
tired of accounting courses and taken a night watchman’s
job). Inductive strength, then, is a matter of probabilities,
not certainties, and (according to logicians) inductive logic
should be based on the theory of probability.
THOUGHT IN ACTION: PROBLEM SOLVING
Problem solving requires breaking down a goal into subgoals that can be
obtained more easily. Strategies for breaking a goal into subgoals include
reducing differences between the current state and the goal state; means–
ends analysis (eliminating the most important differences between the
current and goal states), and working backward.
Some problems are easier to solve by using a visual representation, and
others can be more readily solved by using a propositional representation.
Numerous problems can be solved equally well by visual or propositional
representations.
Expert problem solvers differ from novices in four ways: They have more
representations to bring to bear on the problem, they represent novel
problems in terms of solution principles rather than surface features, they
form a plan before acting, and they tend to reason forward rather than
backward.
Thought processes that do not require effortful attention occur automatically
and without conscious control.