GPTZero AI Scan - Untitled Document

This document provides an analysis of the short story "Love, in the Cornhusk" through the lens of Marxist concepts. It summarizes the plot of the story, which follows a woman named Tinang who visits her former employer. It then analyzes how the story depicts socio-economic inequality between social classes and the Marxist concept of alienation through Tinang's experience as a domestic worker. The document examines how the story shows the impacts of class systems and financial issues on people's lives and relationships.

Uploaded by

Gerard Doroja

We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.

Available Formats

Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

0% found this document useful (0 votes)

50 views2 pages

GPTZero AI Scan - Untitled Document

Uploaded by

Gerard Doroja

We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.

Available Formats

Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

You are on page 1/ 2

Report generated by Version 2023-12-11

Document Title: Untitled document Author:

This text is likely to be a mix of human and AI text

AI Scan Stats

583 words

52% 30 sentences
26 sentences generated by AI

There is a 52% chance this text was written by AI.

FAQ
What is GPTZero?
GPTZero is the leading AI detector for checking whether a document was written by a large language model such as
ChatGPT. GPTZero detects AI on sentence, paragraph, and document level. Our model was trained on a large, diverse
corpus of human-written and AI-generated text, with a focus on English prose. To date, GPTZero has served over 2.5
million users around the world, and works with over 100 organizations in education, hiring, publishing, legal, and more.

When should I use GPTZero?

Our users have seen the use of AI-generated text proliferate into education, certification, hiring and recruitment, social
writing platforms, disinformation, and beyond. We've created GPTZero as a tool to highlight the possible use of AI in
writing text. In particular, we focus on classifying AI use in prose. Overall, our classifier is intended to be used to flag
situations in which a conversation can be started (for example, between educators and students) to drive further inquiry
and spread awareness of the risks of using AI in written work.

Does GPTZero only detect ChatGPT outputs?

No, GPTZero works robustly across a range of AI language models, including but not limited to ChatGPT, GPT-4, GPT-3,
GPT-2, LLaMA, and AI services based on those models.

What are the limitations of the classiﬁer?

The nature of AI-generated content is changing constantly. As such, these results should not be used to punish students.
We recommend educators to use our behind-the-scene Writing Reports as part of a holistic assessment of student work.
There always exist edge cases with both instances where AI is classified as human, and human is classified as AI. Instead,
we recommend educators take approaches that give students the opportunity to demonstrate their understanding in
a controlled environment and craft assignments that cannot be solved with AI. Our classifier is not trained to identify
AI-generated text after it has been heavily modified after generation (although we estimate this is a minority of the
uses for AI-generation at the moment). Currently, our classifier can sometimes flag other machine-generated or highly
procedural text as AI-generated, and as such, should be used on more descriptive portions of text.

I'm an educator who has found AI-generated text by my students. What do I do?
Firstly, at GPTZero, we don't believe that any AI detector is perfect. There always exist edge cases with both instances
where AI is classiﬁed as human, and human is classiﬁed as AI. Nonetheless, we recommend that educators can do the
following when they get a positive detection:

Ask students to demonstrate their understanding in a controlled environment, whether that is through an in-person
assessment, or through an editor that can track their edit history (for instance, using our Writing Reports through
Google Docs). Check out our list of several recommendations on types of assignments that are diﬃcult to solve with
AI.
Ask the student if they can produce artifacts of their writing process, whether it is drafts, revision histories, or
brainstorming notes. For example, if the editor they used to write the text has an edit history (such as Google Docs),
and it was typed out with several edits over a reasonable period of time, it is likely the student work is authentic. You can
use GPTZero's Writing Reports to replay the student's writing process, and view signals that indicate the authenticity
of the work.
See if there is a history of AI-generated text in the student's work. We recommend looking for a long-term pattern
of AI use, as opposed to a single instance, in order to determine whether the student is using AI.
AI Scanned Document

This text is likely to be a mix of human and AI text

AI Content

Untitled document
The story "Love, in the Cornhusk" by Aida Rivera Ford, which was published in the 1950s revolves around a woman
named Tinang. Tinang used to work as a helper, pays a visit to her former employer, Señora, with her baby. She
hopes to ask Señora to become the child's godmother. During their meeting, Señora oﬀers assistance and clothes
for Tinang considering her circumstances. While at Señoras place Tinang discovers that there is a letter waiting
for her at the drugstore. She later learns that it was a love letter from Amado, her lover who used to work as a
tractor driver. In the letter Amado expresses his inability to return due to his mother's illness and shares his hopes
for their future together. Overwhelmed with emotions Tinang reminisces about her life. As the story comes to an
end, she becomes worried when she realizes that her baby has been left unattended among the cornhusks. This
highlights the the challenging realities of her current life. This narrative tackles concepts of Marxism by Karl Marx
such as social class, labor force, and capitalism. This opens itself to a Marxist critique analyzing socio-economic
inequalities, alienation, and reproduction of labor.

The difference between Tinang's life as a domestic helper and her current struggles as a mother and wife reflec-
ts the Marxist concept of socio-economic inequality. The story happens in a setting where class differences are
evident, portraying remnants of the Philippines' long history of colonization where a class structure privileged
Spanish-descents. For instance, the Señora lives a comfortable life, shown by the porch, clothes, scent and ap-
pearance, in contrast Tinang, experiences the hardships of the working class, walking through mud, burdened by
a baby, and the difficulties of her married life. Furthermore, the Señora being able to provide dresses and blankets
for Tinang suggests that economic status determines a person's access to comfort and resources. The letter from
Amado also talks about how financial factors affects personal relationships. Amado's choice to leave Tinang for
better opportunities to help his sick mother shows how financial issues can change personal relationships. The
story shows clearly how different classes can affect lives and relationships, and it makes us think about how old
class systems from colonial times still impact people. The story effectively underscores socio-economic inequality
and their impacts on lives and relationships and serves as a reflection on the enduring legacy of a colonial class
hierarchy.

The Marxist concept of alienation is vividly portrayed in Tinang's narrative. Alienation is the surrender of control
and separation from a crucial aspect of oneself. It is generally described as four types: the product of labor, the
process of labor, others, and self (Horowitz, 2010). The depiction of Tinang's muddy shoes and appearance during
her visit to the Señora symbolizes her physical and symbolic alienation from the privileged lifestyle. Additionally,
while Marx primarily focused on industrial labor, the principles of alienation can be applied to other forms like
domestic work. Tinang was part of the labor force serving the privileged class represented by the Señora. They
engage in tasks that contribute to the wellbeing of the household they serve but do not have ownership over the
products of their labor. The results of their work are beneﬁted by their superiors. This is further shown when she
noticed the waling-waling and was told that the “maid” will come over to do it. This perception devalues individual
workers, like Tinang, as replaceable in their roles, further alienating them from the speciﬁc products they once
nurtured.