Lecture 10
Lecture 10
Lecture 10
• A technical concept:
– Did we do the test?
– Did the results pass or fail the criteria?
– If the results failed did we perform a corrective action?
• QA refers to planned and systematic processes that provide confidence of a product's or service's
effectiveness.
• It makes ‘quality’ a main goal of a production.
• Lab QA: all of the procedures, actions, paperwork that take place to be sure the results given are
accurate.
Quality Assurance
• Accuracy
• Composed of precision and bias
• Measure of the overall agreement of a measurement to a known value
• – when random errors are tightly controlled, bias dominates the overall accuracy
• – when random errors predominate, variance (imprecision) dominates the overall accuracy
• Use bias and precision as separate measures rather than accuracy
Precision
• Precision is the measure of agreement among repeated measurements under identical conditions
• A precision QC is a quantitative indicator of the random errors or fluctuations in the
measurement process
– e.g., standard deviation or variance
- The variance is a measure of variability. It measures variability from the average or mean. It is
calculated by taking the average of squared deviations from the mean.
- The standard deviation (σ) is derived from variance and tells you, on average, how far each value
lies from the mean. It’s the square root of variance.
Sensitivity
• Usually regarded as detection limit
• Capability of a method or instrument to discriminate between measurement responses
– but this term is often used without defining what is intended (minimum detection or
quantitation)
• A sensitivity QC describes the capability of measuring a constituent at low levels
– a Practical Quantitation Level describes the ability to quantify a constituent with known
certainty
• e.g., a PQL of 0.05 mg/L for mercury represents the level where a precision of +/- 15% can be
obtained.
Bias
• Bias is systematic or persistent distortion of a measurement process that causes error in one
direction
• A bias can result from:
– biased sampling design
– calibration errors
– unaccounted-for interferences
– chronic sample contamination
Influence of Bias and Imprecision on Overall Accuracy
Data Verification
• The procedures needed to ensure that a set of data is a faithful reflection of all the processes
and procedures used to generate the data
– verification entails the examination of objective evidence that the specified method, procedures,
and contractual requirements were fulfilled
Data Validation
• Analyte and sample matrix-specific process to determine the analytical quality of
a data set
– inspection of data handling practices for deviations from consistency,
– review of quality control (QC) information for deviations,
– assessment of deviations,
– assignment of data qualification codes
• Validation can entail the examination of the data with respect to the QA Project Plan
Calibration System
• In a calibration system, the following items shall be defined.
1. Classification of calibration
2. Standard and levels of standard.
3. Interval of calibration and limit of correction
4. Procedures of calibration
5. Action after calibration
6. Conditions to use measuring instrument
7. Procedures of measurement
Why Measurements?
Measurements are basic tools
• If I can define it, I can measure it.
• If I can measure it, I can analyze it.
• If I can analyze it, I can control it.
• If I can control it, I can improve it.
• Accuracy is the critical parameter, and is not the same as precision. Accuracy is closeness to the
true value (of the measured), while precision implies consistency among repeat measurements .
• The quality of the measurement result, its accuracy, is characterized by measurement uncertainty
(or simply uncertainty), which defines an interval around the measured value CMEASURED, where the
true value CTRUE lies with some probability.
Uncertainty of measurement
• Uncertainty of measurement is the doubt that exists about the result of any measurement. You
might think that well-made rulers, clocks and thermometers should be trustworthy, and give the
right answers. But for every measurement - even the most careful - there is always a margin of doubt.
• Since there is always a margin of doubt about any measurement, we need to ask ‘How big is the
margin?’ and ‘How bad is the doubt?’ Thus, two numbers are really needed in order to quantify ; One is
the width of the margin, or interval. The other is a confidence level, and states how sure we are that the
‘true value’ is within that margin.
• For example: We might say that the length of a certain stick measures 20 centimetres plus or minus 1
centimetre, at the 95 percent confidence level. This result could be written:
20 cm ±1 cm, at a level of confidence of 95%.
The statement says that we are 95 percent sure that the stick is between 19 centimetres and 21
centimetres long.
NABL Requirements :Technical Criteria
• National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories (NABL) is
an autonomous body under the Department of Science & Technology (DST),
Government of India. The objective of NABL is to provide third-party assessment
of the quality and technical competence of testing and calibration laboratories.
• Chemical tests
- Control of incoming raw materials – inclusions and composition
- Product certification
- Client requests and orders
• Mechanical Tests
• Tensile Test at RT and High Temperature
• Hardness Test (Brinell – Rockwell – Vickers)
• Creep and Stress Rupture Test
• Fatigue Tests
Metallurgical Quality Control Tests