AutoMapper Documentation
AutoMapper Documentation
AutoMapper Documentation
Jimmy Bogard
4 Configuration 9
4.1 Profile Instances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.2 Naming Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4.3 Replacing characters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4.4 Recognizing pre/postfixes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4.5 Global property/field filtering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4.6 Configuring visibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4.7 Configuration compilation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
5 Configuration Validation 15
5.1 Overriding configuration errors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
5.2 Selecting members to validate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
5.3 Custom validations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
6 Dependency Injection 17
6.1 Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
6.2 Low level API-s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
6.3 Queryable Extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
7 Projection 19
8 Nested Mappings 21
i
10 Construction 27
11 Flattening 29
11.1 IncludeMembers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
13 Mapping Inheritance 35
13.1 Runtime polymorphism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
13.2 Specifying inheritance in derived classes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
13.3 As . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
13.4 Inheritance Mapping Priorities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
14 Attribute Mapping 39
14.1 Type Map configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
14.2 Member configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
16 Open Generics 45
17 Queryable Extensions 47
17.1 The instance API . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
17.2 Preventing lazy loading/SELECT N+1 problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
17.3 Custom projection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
17.4 Custom Type Conversion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
17.5 Custom destination type constructors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
17.6 String conversion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
17.7 Explicit expansion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
17.8 Aggregations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
17.9 Parameterization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
17.10 Supported mapping options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
19 AutoMapper.Extensions.EnumMapping 57
19.1 Usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
19.2 Default Convention . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
19.3 ReverseMap Convention . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
19.4 Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
ii
22 Conditional Mapping 69
22.1 Preconditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
23 Null Substitution 71
24 Value Converters 73
25 Value Transformers 75
27 API Changes 81
iii
33.3 ResolveUsing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
33.4 UseValue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
33.5 ForSourceMember Ignore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
33.6 Generic maps validation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
35 Examples 101
36 Housekeeping 103
iv
AutoMapper Documentation
Overview 1
AutoMapper Documentation
2 Overview
CHAPTER 1
AutoMapper is an object-object mapper. Object-object mapping works by transforming an input object of one type
into an output object of a different type. What makes AutoMapper interesting is that it provides some interesting
conventions to take the dirty work out of figuring out how to map type A to type B. As long as type B follows
AutoMapper’s established convention, almost zero configuration is needed to map two types.
Mapping code is boring. Testing mapping code is even more boring. AutoMapper provides simple configuration of
types, as well as simple testing of mappings. The real question may be “why use object-object mapping?” Mapping can
occur in many places in an application, but mostly in the boundaries between layers, such as between the UI/Domain
layers, or Service/Domain layers. Concerns of one layer often conflict with concerns in another, so object-object
mapping leads to segregated models, where concerns for each layer can affect only types in that layer.
First, you need both a source and destination type to work with. The destination type’s design can be influenced by
the layer in which it lives, but AutoMapper works best as long as the names of the members match up to the source
type’s members. If you have a source member called “FirstName”, this will automatically be mapped to a destination
member with the name “FirstName”. AutoMapper also supports Flattening.
AutoMapper will ignore null reference exceptions when mapping your source to your target. This is by design. If you
don’t like this approach, you can combine AutoMapper’s approach with custom value resolvers if needed.
Once you have your types you can create a map for the two types using a MapperConfiguration and CreateMap.
You only need one MapperConfiguration instance typically per AppDomain and should be instantiated during
startup. More examples of initial setup can be seen in Setup.
3
AutoMapper Documentation
The type on the left is the source type, and the type on the right is the destination type. To perform a mapping, call
one of the Map overloads:
Most applications can use dependency injection to inject the created IMapper instance.
AutoMapper also has non-generic versions of these methods, for those cases where you might not know the type at
compile time.
Configuration should only happen once per AppDomain. That means the best place to put the configuration code is in
application startup, such as the Global.asax file for ASP.NET applications. Typically, the configuration bootstrapper
class is in its own class, and this bootstrapper class is called from the startup method. The bootstrapper class should
construct a MapperConfiguration object to configure the type maps.
For ASP.NET Core the Dependency Injection article shows how to configure AutoMapper in your application.
To test your mappings, you need to create a test that does two things:
• Call your bootstrapper class to create all the mappings
• Call MapperConfiguration.AssertConfigurationIsValid
Here’s an example:
config.AssertConfigurationIsValid();
AutoMapper creates an execution plan for your mapping. That execution plan can be viewed as an expression tree
during debugging. You can get a better view of the resulting code by installing the ReadableExpressions VS extension.
If you need to see the code outside VS, you can use the ReadableExpressions package directly. This DotNetFiddle has
a live demo using the NuGet package, and this article describes using the VS extension.
5
AutoMapper Documentation
AutoMapper uses MyGet to publish development builds based on the master branch. This means that the MyGet build
sometimes contains fixes that are not available in the current NuGet package. Please try the latest MyGet build before
reporting issues, in case your issue has already been fixed but not released.
The AutoMapper MyGet gallery is available here. Be sure to include prereleases.
If you want to install the latest MyGet package into a project, you can use the following command:
7
AutoMapper Documentation
Configuration
The MapperConfiguration instance can be stored statically, in a static field or in a dependency injection con-
tainer. Once created it cannot be changed/modified.
var configuration = new MapperConfiguration(cfg => {
cfg.CreateMap<Foo, Bar>();
cfg.AddProfile<FooProfile>();
});
A good way to organize your mapping configurations is with profiles. Create classes that inherit from Profile and
put the configuration in the constructor:
// This is the approach starting with version 5
public class OrganizationProfile : Profile
{
public OrganizationProfile()
{
CreateMap<Foo, FooDto>();
// Use CreateMap... Etc.. here (Profile methods are the same as
˓→configuration methods)
}
}
(continues on next page)
9
AutoMapper Documentation
In earlier versions the Configure method was used instead of a constructor. As of version 5, Configure() is
obsolete. It will be removed in 6.0.
Configuration inside a profile only applies to maps inside the profile. Configuration applied to the root configuration
applies to all maps created.
Profiles can be added to the main mapper configuration in a number of ways, either directly:
cfg.AddProfile<OrganizationProfile>();
cfg.AddProfile(new OrganizationProfile());
AutoMapper will scan the designated assemblies for classes inheriting from Profile and add them to the configuration.
10 Chapter 4. Configuration
AutoMapper Documentation
This will map the following properties to each other: property_name -> PropertyName
You can also set this per profile
If you don’t need a naming convention, you can use the ExactMatchNamingConvention.
You can also replace individual characters or entire words in source members during member name matching:
Sometimes your source/destination properties will have common pre/postfixes that cause you to have to do a bunch of
custom member mappings because the names don’t match up. To address this, you can recognize pre/postfixes:
By default AutoMapper recognizes the prefix “Get”, if you need to clear the prefix:
By default, AutoMapper tries to map every public property/field. You can filter out properties/fields with the prop-
erty/field filters:
});
By default, AutoMapper only recognizes public members. It can map to private setters, but will skip internal/private
methods and properties if the entire property is private/internal. To instruct AutoMapper to recognize members with
other visibilities, override the default filters ShouldMapField and/or ShouldMapProperty :
12 Chapter 4. Configuration
AutoMapper Documentation
Because expression compilation can be a bit resource intensive, AutoMapper lazily compiles the type map plans on
first map. However, this behavior is not always desirable, so you can tell AutoMapper to compile its mappings directly:
For a few hundred mappings, this may take a couple of seconds. If it’s a lot more than that, you probably have some
really big execution plans.
Compilation times increase with the size of the execution plan and that depends on the number of properties and their
complexity. Ideally, you would fix your model so you have many small DTOs, each for a particular use case. But you
can also decrease the size of the execution plan without changing your classes.
You can set MapAtRuntime per member or MaxExecutionPlanDepth globally (the default is one, set it to
zero).
These will reduce the size of the execution plan by replacing the execution plan for a child object with a method call.
The compilation will be faster, but the mapping itself might be slower. Search the repo for more details and use a
profiler to better understand the effect. Avoiding PreserveReferences and MaxDepth also helps.
14 Chapter 4. Configuration
CHAPTER 5
Configuration Validation
Hand-rolled mapping code, though tedious, has the advantage of being testable. One of the inspirations behind Au-
toMapper was to eliminate not just the custom mapping code, but eliminate the need for manual testing. Because the
mapping from source to destination is convention-based, you will still need to test your configuration.
AutoMapper provides configuration testing in the form of the AssertConfigurationIsValid method. Suppose we have
slightly misconfigured our source and destination types:
In the Destination type, we probably fat-fingered the destination property. Other typical issues are source member
renames. To test our configuration, we simply create a unit test that sets up the configuration and executes the Assert-
ConfigurationIsValid method:
configuration.AssertConfigurationIsValid();
15
AutoMapper Documentation
To fix a configuration error (besides renaming the source/destination members), you have three choices for providing
an alternate configuration:
• Custom Value Resolvers
• Projection
• Use the Ignore() option
With the third option, we have a member on the destination type that we will fill with alternative means, and not
through the Map operation.
By default, AutoMapper uses the destination type to validate members. It assumes that all destination members need to
be mapped. To modify this behavior, use the CreateMap overload to specify which member list to validate against:
You can add custom validations through an extension point. See here.
Dependency Injection
6.1 Examples
There is a NuGet package to be used with the default injection mechanism described here and used in this project.
You define the configuration using profiles. And then you let AutoMapper know in what assemblies are those profiles
defined by calling the IServiceCollection extension method AddAutoMapper at startup:
or marker types:
services.AddAutoMapper(typeof(ProfileTypeFromAssembly1),
˓→typeof(ProfileTypeFromAssembly2) /*, ...*/);
6.1.2 AutoFac
17
AutoMapper Documentation
AutoMapper supports the ability to construct Custom Value Resolvers, Custom Type Converters, and Value Converters
using static service location:
cfg.CreateMap<Source, Destination>();
});
Or dynamic service location, to be used in the case of instance-based containers (including child/nested containers):
Starting with 8.0 you can use IMapper.ProjectTo. For older versions you need to pass the configuration to the
extension method IQueryable.ProjectTo<T>(IConfigurationProvider).
Note that ProjectTo is more limited than Map, as only what is allowed by the underlying LINQ provider is sup-
ported. That means you cannot use DI with value resolvers and converters as you can with Map.
Projection
Projection transforms a source to a destination beyond flattening the object model. Without extra configuration, Au-
toMapper requires a flattened destination to match the source type’s naming structure. When you want to project
source values into a destination that does not exactly match the source structure, you must specify custom member
mapping definitions. For example, we might want to turn this source structure:
public class CalendarEvent
{
public DateTime Date { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
}
Into something that works better for an input form on a web page:
public class CalendarEventForm
{
public DateTime EventDate { get; set; }
public int EventHour { get; set; }
public int EventMinute { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
}
Because the names of the destination properties do not exactly match the source property (CalendarEvent.Date
would need to be CalendarEventForm.EventDate), we need to specify custom member mappings in our type
map configuration:
// Model
var calendarEvent = new CalendarEvent
{
Date = new DateTime(2008, 12, 15, 20, 30, 0),
Title = "Company Holiday Party"
};
// Configure AutoMapper
var configuration = new MapperConfiguration(cfg =>
(continues on next page)
19
AutoMapper Documentation
// Perform mapping
CalendarEventForm form = mapper.Map<CalendarEvent, CalendarEventForm>(calendarEvent);
Each custom member configuration uses an action delegate to configure each individual member. In the above exam-
ple, we used the MapFrom option to perform custom source-to-destination member mappings. The MapFrom method
takes a lambda expression as a parameter, which is then evaluated later during mapping. The MapFrom expression
can be any Func<TSource, object> lambda expression.
20 Chapter 7. Projection
CHAPTER 8
Nested Mappings
As the mapping engine executes the mapping, it can use one of a variety of methods to resolve a destination member
value. One of these methods is to use another type map, where the source member type and destination member
type are also configured in the mapping configuration. This allows us to not only flatten our source types, but create
complex destination types as well. For example, our source type might contain another complex type:
public class OuterSource
{
public int Value { get; set; }
public InnerSource Inner { get; set; }
}
We could simply flatten the OuterSource.Inner.OtherValue to one InnerOtherValue property, but we might also want
to create a corresponding complex type for the Inner property:
public class OuterDest
{
public int Value { get; set; }
public InnerDest Inner { get; set; }
}
In that case, we would need to configure the additional source/destination type mappings:
var config = new MapperConfiguration(cfg => {
cfg.CreateMap<OuterSource, OuterDest>();
(continues on next page)
21
AutoMapper Documentation
dest.Value.ShouldEqual(5);
dest.Inner.ShouldNotBeNull();
dest.Inner.OtherValue.ShouldEqual(15);
AutoMapper only requires configuration of element types, not of any array or list type that might be used. For example,
we might have a simple source and destination type:
23
AutoMapper Documentation
• IEnumerable
• IEnumerable<T>
• ICollection
• ICollection<T>
• IList
• IList<T>
• List<T>
• Arrays
For the non-generic enumerable types, only unmapped, assignable types are supported, as AutoMapper will be unable
to “guess” what types you’re trying to map. As shown in the example above, it’s not necessary to explicitly configure
list types, only their member types.
When mapping to an existing collection, the destination collection is cleared first. If this is not what you want, take a
look at AutoMapper.Collection.
When mapping a collection property, if the source value is null AutoMapper will map the destination field to an empty
collection rather than setting the destination value to null. This aligns with the behavior of Entity Framework and
Framework Design Guidelines that believe C# references, arrays, lists, collections, dictionaries and IEnumerables
should NEVER be null, ever.
This behavior can be changed by setting the AllowNullCollections property to true when configuring the
mapper.
The setting can be applied globally and can be overridden per profile and per member with AllowNull and
DoNotAllowNull.
Many times, we might have a hierarchy of types in both our source and destination types. AutoMapper supports
polymorphic arrays and collections, such that derived source/destination types are used if found.
AutoMapper still requires explicit configuration for child mappings, as AutoMapper cannot “guess” which specific
child destination mapping to use. Here is an example of the above types:
destinations[0].ShouldBeInstanceOf<ParentDestination>();
destinations[1].ShouldBeInstanceOf<ChildDestination>();
destinations[2].ShouldBeInstanceOf<ParentDestination>();
Construction
If the destination constructor parameter names don’t match, you can modify them at config time:
27
AutoMapper Documentation
You can configure which constructors are considered for the destination object:
Flattening
One of the common usages of object-object mapping is to take a complex object model and flatten it to a simpler
model. You can take a complex model such as:
29
AutoMapper Documentation
We want to flatten this complex Order object into a simpler OrderDto that contains only the data needed for a certain
scenario:
When you configure a source/destination type pair in AutoMapper, the configurator attempts to match properties and
methods on the source type to properties on the destination type. If for any property on the destination type a property,
method, or a method prefixed with “Get” does not exist on the source type, AutoMapper splits the destination member
name into individual words (by PascalCase conventions).
// Complex model
// Configure AutoMapper
// Perform mapping
(continues on next page)
dto.CustomerName.ShouldEqual("George Costanza");
dto.Total.ShouldEqual(74.85m);
We configured the type map in AutoMapper with the CreateMap method. AutoMapper can only map type pairs it
knows about, so we have explicitly register the source/destination type pair with CreateMap. To perform the mapping,
we use the Map method.
On the OrderDto type, the Total property matched to the GetTotal() method on Order. The CustomerName property
matched to the Customer.Name property on Order. As long as we name our destination properties appropriately, we
do not need to configure individual property matching.
If you want to disable this behavior, you can use the ExactMatchNamingConvention:
cfg.DestinationMemberNamingConvention = new ExactMatchNamingConvention();
11.1 IncludeMembers
If you need more control when flattening, you can use IncludeMembers. You can map members of a child object
to the destination object when you already have a map from the child type to the destination type (unlike the classic
flattening that doesn’t require a map for the child type).
class Source
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public InnerSource InnerSource { get; set; }
public OtherInnerSource OtherInnerSource { get; set; }
}
class InnerSource
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
}
class OtherInnerSource
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
}
class Destination
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
}
cfg.CreateMap<InnerSource, Destination>(MemberList.None);
cfg.CreateMap<OtherInnerSource, Destination>();
var source = new Source { Name = "name", InnerSource = new InnerSource{ Description =
˓→"description" },
(continues on next page)
11.1. IncludeMembers 31
AutoMapper Documentation
So this allows you to reuse the configuration in the existing map for the child types InnerSource and
OtherInnerSource when mapping the parent types Source and Destination. It works in a similar way
to mapping inheritance, but it uses composition, not inheritance.
The order of the parameters in the IncludeMembers call is relevant. When mapping a destination member, the first
match wins, starting with the source object itself and then with the included child objects in the order you specified.
So in the example above, Name is mapped from the source object itself and Description from InnerSource
because it’s the first match.
Note that this matching is static, it happens at configuration time, not at Map time, so the runtime types of the child
objects are not considered.
IncludeMembers integrates with ReverseMap. An included member will be reversed to
and the other way around. If that’s not what you want, you can avoid ReverseMap (explicitly create the reverse map)
or you can override the default settings (using Ignore or IncludeMembers without parameters respectively).
For details, check the tests.
Starting with 6.1.0, AutoMapper now supports richer reverse mapping support. Given our entities:
By calling ReverseMap, AutoMapper creates a reverse mapping configuration that includes unflattening:
33
AutoMapper Documentation
orderDto.CustomerName = "Joe";
mapper.Map(orderDto, order);
order.Customer.Name.ShouldEqual("Joe");
Unflattening is only configured for ReverseMap. If you want unflattening, you must configure Entity -> Dto
then call ReverseMap to create an unflattening type map configuration from the Dto -> Entity.
AutoMapper will automatically reverse map “Customer.Name” from “CustomerName” based on the original flatten-
ing. If you use MapFrom, AutoMapper will attempt to reverse the map:
cfg.CreateMap<Order, OrderDto>()
.ForMember(d => d.CustomerName, opt => opt.MapFrom(src => src.Customer.Name))
.ReverseMap();
As long as the MapFrom path are member accessors, AutoMapper will unflatten from the same path
(CustomerName => Customer.Name).
If you need to customize this, for a reverse map you can use ForPath:
cfg.CreateMap<Order, OrderDto>()
.ForMember(d => d.CustomerName, opt => opt.MapFrom(src => src.Customer.Name))
.ReverseMap()
.ForPath(s => s.Customer.Name, opt => opt.MapFrom(src => src.CustomerName));
For most cases you shouldn’t need this, as the original MapFrom will be reversed for you. Use ForPath when the path
to get and set the values are different.
If you do not want unflattening behavior, you can remove the call to ReverseMap and create two separate maps. Or,
you can use Ignore:
cfg.CreateMap<Order, OrderDto>()
.ForMember(d => d.CustomerName, opt => opt.MapFrom(src => src.Customer.Name))
.ReverseMap()
.ForPath(s => s.Customer.Name, opt => opt.Ignore());
12.2 IncludeMembers
Mapping Inheritance
CreateMap<BaseEntity, BaseDto>()
.Include<DerivedEntity, DerivedDto>()
.ForMember(dest => dest.SomeMember, opt => opt.MapFrom(src => src.OtherMember));
CreateMap<DerivedEntity, DerivedDto>();
or
CreateMap<BaseEntity, BaseDto>()
.ForMember(dest => dest.SomeMember, opt => opt.MapFrom(src => src.OtherMember));
CreateMap<DerivedEntity, DerivedDto>()
.IncludeBase<BaseEntity, BaseDto>();
In each case above, the derived mapping inherits the custom mapping configuration from the base mapping configura-
tion.
To include all derived maps, from the base type map configuration:
CreateMap<BaseEntity, BaseDto>()
.IncludeAllDerived();
CreateMap<DerivedEntity, DerivedDto>();
35
AutoMapper Documentation
Take:
// Perform Mapping
var order = new OnlineOrder();
var mapped = mapper.Map(order, order.GetType(), typeof(OrderDto));
Assert.IsType<OnlineOrderDto>(mapped);
You will notice that because the mapped object is a OnlineOrder, AutoMapper has seen you have a more specific
mapping for OnlineOrder than OrderDto, and automatically chosen that.
Instead of configuring inheritance from the base class, you can specify inheritance from the derived classes:
13.3 As
For simple cases, you can use As to redirect a base map to an existing derived map:
cfg.CreateMap<Order, OnlineOrderDto>();
cfg.CreateMap<Order, OrderDto>().As<OnlineOrderDto>();
mapper.Map<OrderDto>(new Order()).ShouldBeOfType<OnlineOrderDto>();
This introduces additional complexity because there are multiple ways a property can be mapped. The priority of these
sources are as follows
• Explicit Mapping (using .MapFrom())
• Inherited Explicit Mapping
• Ignore Property Mapping
• Convention Mapping (Properties that are matched via convention)
To demonstrate this, lets modify our classes shown above
//Domain Objects
public class Order { }
public class OnlineOrder : Order
{
public string Referrer { get; set; }
}
public class MailOrder : Order { }
//Dtos
public class OrderDto
{
public string Referrer { get; set; }
}
//Mappings
var configuration = new MapperConfiguration(cfg => {
cfg.CreateMap<Order, OrderDto>()
.Include<OnlineOrder, OrderDto>()
.Include<MailOrder, OrderDto>()
.ForMember(o=>o.Referrer, m=>m.Ignore());
cfg.CreateMap<OnlineOrder, OrderDto>();
cfg.CreateMap<MailOrder, OrderDto>();
});
// Perform Mapping
var order = new OnlineOrder { Referrer = "google" };
var mapped = mapper.Map(order, order.GetType(), typeof(OrderDto));
Assert.IsNull(mapped.Referrer);
Notice that in our mapping configuration, we have ignored Referrer (because it doesn’t exist in the order base
class) and that has a higher priority than convention mapping, so the property doesn’t get mapped.
If you do want the Referrer property to be mapped in the mapping from OnlineOrder to OrderDto you should
include an explicit mapping in the mapping like this:
cfg.CreateMap<OnlineOrder, OrderDto>()
.ForMember(o=>o.Referrer, m=>m.MapFrom(x=>x.Referrer));
Overall this feature should make using AutoMapper with classes that leverage inheritance feel more natural.
Attribute Mapping
In addition to fluent configuration is the ability to declare and configure maps via attributes. Attribute maps can
supplement or replace fluent mapping configuration.
AddMaps looks for fluent map configuration (Profile classes) and attribute-based mappings.
To declare an attribute map, decorate your destination type with the AutoMapAttribute:
[AutoMap(typeof(Order))]
public class OrderDto {
// destination members
To customize the overall type map configuration, you can set the following properties on the AutoMapAttribute:
• ReverseMap (bool)
• ConstructUsingServiceLocator (bool)
• MaxDepth (int)
• PreserveReferences (bool)
• DisableCtorValidation (bool)
39
AutoMapper Documentation
• IncludeAllDerived (bool)
• TypeConverter (Type)
• AsProxy (bool)
These all correspond to the similar fluent mapping configuration options. Only the sourceType value is required to
map.
For attribute-based maps, you can decorate individual members with additional configuration. Because attributes have
limitations in C# (no expressions, for example), the configuration options available are a bit limited.
Member-based attributes are declared in the AutoMapper.Configuration.Annotations namespace.
If the attribute-based configuration is not available or will not work, you can combine both attribute and profile-based
maps (though this may be confusing).
Use the IgnoreAttribute to ignore an individual destination member from mapping and/or validation:
using AutoMapper.Configuration.Annotations;
[AutoMap(typeof(Order))]
public class OrderDto {
[Ignore]
public decimal Total { get; set; }
It is not possible to use MapFrom with an expression in an attribute, but SourceMemberAttribute can redirect
to a separate named member:
using AutoMapper.Configuration.Annotations;
[AutoMap(typeof(Order))]
public class OrderDto {
[SourceMember("OrderTotal")]
public decimal Total { get; set; }
using AutoMapper.Configuration.Annotations;
[AutoMap(typeof(Order))]
public class OrderDto {
[SourceMember(nameof(Order.OrderTotal))]
public decimal Total { get; set; }
You cannot flatten with this attribute, only redirect source type members (i.e. no “Order.Customer.Office.Name” in
the name). Configuring flattening is only available with the fluent configuration.
AutoMapper can map to/from dynamic objects without any explicit configuration:
Similarly you can map straight from Dictionary<string, object> to objects, AutoMapper will line up the
keys with property names. For mapping to destination child objects, you can use the dot notation.
result.InnerFoo.Bar.ShouldEqual(42);
43
AutoMapper Documentation
Open Generics
AutoMapper can support an open generic type map. Create a map for the open generic types:
You don’t need to create maps for closed generic types. AutoMapper will apply any configuration from the open
generic mapping to the closed mapping at runtime:
dest.Value.ShouldEqual(10);
Because C# only allows closed generic type parameters, you have to use the System.Type version of CreateMap to
create your open generic type maps. From there, you can use all of the mapping configuration available and the open
generic configuration will be applied to the closed type map at runtime. AutoMapper will skip open generic type maps
during configuration validation, since you can still create closed types that don’t convert, such as Source<Foo> ->
Destination<Bar> where there is no conversion from Foo to Bar.
You can also create an open generic type converter:
45
AutoMapper Documentation
AutoMapper also supports open generic type converters with any number of generic arguments:
The closed type from Source will be the first generic argument, and the closed type of Destination will be the
second argument to close Converter<,>.
The same idea applies to value resolvers. Check the tests.
Queryable Extensions
When using an ORM such as NHibernate or Entity Framework with AutoMapper’s standard mapper.Map functions,
you may notice that the ORM will query all the fields of all the objects within a graph when AutoMapper is attempting
to map the results to a destination type.
If your ORM exposes IQueryables, you can use AutoMapper’s QueryableExtensions helper methods to address
this key pain.
Using Entity Framework for an example, say that you have an entity OrderLine with a relationship with an entity
Item. If you want to map this to an OrderLineDTO with the Item’s Name property, the standard mapper.Map
call will result in Entity Framework querying the entire OrderLine and Item table.
Use this approach instead.
Given the following entities:
47
AutoMapper Documentation
The .ProjectTo<OrderLineDTO>() will tell AutoMapper’s mapping engine to emit a select clause to the
IQueryable that will inform entity framework that it only needs to query the Name column of the Item table, same as
if you manually projected your IQueryable to an OrderLineDTO with a Select clause.
ProjectTo must be the last call in the chain. ORMs work with entities, not DTOs. So apply any filtering and sorting
on entities and, as the last step, project to DTOs.
Note that for this feature to work, all type conversions must be explicitly handled in your Mapping. For example, you
can not rely on the ToString() override of the Item class to inform entity framework to only select from the Name
column, and any data type changes, such as Double to Decimal must be explicitly handled as well.
Starting with 8.0 there are similar ProjectTo methods on IMapper that feel more natural when you use IMapper with
DI.
Because the LINQ projection built by AutoMapper is translated directly to a SQL query by the query provider, the
mapping occurs at the SQL/ADO.NET level, and not touching your entities. All data is eagerly fetched and loaded
into your DTOs.
Nested collections use a Select to project child DTOs:
from i in db.Instructors
orderby i.LastName
select new InstructorIndexData.InstructorModel
{
ID = i.ID,
FirstMidName = i.FirstMidName,
LastName = i.LastName,
HireDate = i.HireDate,
OfficeAssignmentLocation = i.OfficeAssignment.Location,
(continues on next page)
This map through AutoMapper will result in a SELECT N+1 problem, as each child Course will be queried one
at a time, unless specified through your ORM to eagerly fetch. With LINQ projection, no special configuration or
specification is needed with your ORM. The ORM uses the LINQ projection to build the exact SQL query needed.
In the case where members names don’t line up, or you want to create calculated property, you can use MapFrom (the
expression-based overload) to supply a custom expression for a destination member:
.ForMember(d => d.FullName, opt => opt.MapFrom(c => c.FirstName + " " + c.
˓→LastName))
AutoMapper passes the supplied expression with the built projection. As long as your query provider can interpret the
supplied expression, everything will be passed down all the way to the database.
If the expression is rejected from your query provider (Entity Framework, NHibernate, etc.), you might need to tweak
your expression until you find one that is accepted.
Occasionally, you need to completely replace a type conversion from a source to a destination type. In normal runtime
mapping, this is accomplished via the ConvertUsing method. To perform the analog in LINQ projection, use the
ConvertUsing method:
The expression-based ConvertUsing is slightly more limited than Func-based ConvertUsing overloads as only
what is allowed in an Expression and the underlying LINQ provider will work.
If your destination type has a custom constructor but you don’t want to override the entire mapping, use the Construc-
tUsing expression-based method overload:
cfg.CreateProjection<Source, Dest>()
.ConstructUsing(src => new Dest(src.Value + 10));
AutoMapper will automatically match up destination constructor parameters to source members based on matching
names, so only use this method if AutoMapper can’t match up the destination constructor properly, or if you need
extra customization during construction.
AutoMapper will automatically add ToString() when the destination member type is a string and the source
member type is not.
In some scenarios, such as OData, a generic DTO is returned through an IQueryable controller action. Without
explicit instructions, AutoMapper will expand all members in the result. To control which members are expanded
during projection, set ExplicitExpansion in the configuration and then pass in the members you want to explicitly
expand:
dbContext.Orders.ProjectTo<OrderDto>(configuration,
dest => dest.Customer,
dest => dest.LineItems);
// or string-based
dbContext.Orders.ProjectTo<OrderDto>(configuration,
null,
"Customer",
"LineItems");
// for collections
dbContext.Orders.ProjectTo<OrderDto>(configuration,
null,
dest => dest.LineItems.Select(item => item.Product));
17.8 Aggregations
LINQ can support aggregate queries, and AutoMapper supports LINQ extension methods. In the custom projection
example, if we renamed the TotalContacts property to ContactsCount, AutoMapper would match to the
Count() extension method and the LINQ provider would translate the count into a correlated subquery to aggregate
child records.
AutoMapper can also support complex aggregations and nested restrictions, if the LINQ provider supports it:
cfg.CreateProjection<Course, CourseModel>()
.ForMember(m => m.EnrollmentsStartingWithA,
opt => opt.MapFrom(c => c.Enrollments.Where(e => e.Student.LastName.
˓→StartsWith("A")).Count()));
This query returns the total number of students, for each course, whose last name starts with the letter ‘A’.
17.9 Parameterization
Occasionally, projections need runtime parameters for their values. Consider a projection that needs to pull in the
current username as part of its data. Instead of using post-mapping code, we can parameterize our MapFrom configu-
ration:
This works by capturing the name of the closure’s field name in the original expression, then using an anonymous
object/dictionary to apply the value to the parameter value before the query is sent to the query provider.
You may also use a dictionary to build the projection values:
However, using a dictionary will result in hard-coded values in the query instead of a parameterized query, so use with
caution.
Not all mapping options can be supported, as the expression generated must be interpreted by a LINQ provider. Only
what is supported by LINQ providers is supported by AutoMapper:
• MapFrom (Expression-based)
• ConvertUsing (Expression-based)
• Ignore
• NullSubstitute
• Value transformers
• IncludeMembers
Not supported:
• Condition
• SetMappingOrder
• UseDestinationValue
• MapFrom (Func-based)
• Before/AfterMap
• Custom resolvers
• Custom type converters
• ForPath
17.9. Parameterization 51
AutoMapper Documentation
• Value converters
• Any calculated property on your domain object
Additionally, recursive or self-referencing destination types are not supported as LINQ providers do not support this.
Typically hierarchical relational data models require common table expressions (CTEs) to correctly resolve a recursive
join.
Automapper supports translating Expressions from one object to another in a separate package. This is done by
substituting the properties from the source class to what they map to in the destination class.
Given the example classes:
public class OrderLine
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int OrderId { get; set; }
public Item Item { get; set; }
public decimal Quantity { get; set; }
}
cfg.CreateMap<OrderLine, OrderLineDTO>()
.ForMember(dto => dto.Item, conf => conf.MapFrom(ol => ol.Item.Name));
cfg.CreateMap<OrderLineDTO, OrderLine>()
.ForMember(ol => ol.Item, conf => conf.MapFrom(dto => dto));
(continues on next page)
53
AutoMapper Documentation
Expression<Func<IQueryable<OrderLineDTO>,IQueryable<OrderLineDTO>>> dtoExpression =
˓→dtos => dtos.Where(dto => dto.Quantity > 5).OrderBy(dto => dto.Quantity);
Resulting in ols => ols.Where(ol => ol.Quantity > 5).OrderBy(ol => ol.Quantity)
AutoMapper also supports mapping flattened (TModel or DTO) properties in expressions to their corresponding
(TData) navigation properties (when the navigation property has been removed from the view model or DTO) e.g.
CourseModel.DepartmentName from the model expression becomes Course.Department in the data expression.
Take the following set of classes:
˓→IIncludableQueryable<Course, object>>>>(exp);
The resulting mapped expression (expMapped.ToString()) is then i => i.Include(s => s.Department);
. This feature allows navigation properties for the query to be defined based on the view model alone.
Much like how Queryable Extensions can only support certain things that the LINQ providers support, expression
translation follows the same rules as what it can and can’t support.
18.3 UseAsDataSource
Mapping expressions to one another is a tedious and produces long ugly code.
UseAsDataSource().For<DTO>() makes this translation clean by not having to explicitly map expressions. It
also calls ProjectTo<TDO>() for you as well, where applicable.
Using EntityFramework as an example
dataContext.OrderLines.UseAsDataSource().For<OrderLineDTO>().Where(dto => dto.
Name.StartsWith("A"))
Does the equivalent of
dataContext.OrderLines.Where(ol => ol.Item.Name.StartsWith("A")).
ProjectTo<OrderLineDTO>()
Expression Translation works for all kinds of functions, including Select calls. If Select is used after
UseAsDataSource() and changes the return type, then ProjectTo<>() won’t be called and mapper.Map
will be used instead.
Example:
dataContext.OrderLines.UseAsDataSource().For<OrderLineDTO>().Select(dto =>
dto.Name)
Does the equivalent of
dataContext.OrderLines.Select(ol => ol.Item.Name)
Sometimes, you may want to edit the collection, that is returned from a mapped query before forwarding it to the
next application layer. With .ProjectTo<TDto> this is quite simple, as there is no sense in directly returning the
resulting IQueryable<TDto> because you cannot edit it anymore anyways. So you will most likely do this:
}
return dtos;
}
}
However, if you did this with the .UseAsDataSource() approach, you would lose all of its power - namely
its ability to modify the internal expression until it is enumerated. To solve that problem, we introduced the .
OnEnumerated callback. Using it, you can do the following:
}
}
}
}
AutoMapper.Extensions.EnumMapping
The built-in enum mapper is not configurable, it can only be replaced. Alternatively, AutoMapper supports convention
based mapping of enum values in a separate package AutoMapper.Extensions.EnumMapping.
19.1 Usage
For method CreateMap this library provide a ConvertUsingEnumMapping method. This method add all de-
fault mappings from source to destination enum values.
If you want to change some mappings, then you can use MapValue method. This is a chainable method.
Default the enum values are mapped by value (explicitly: MapByValue()), but it is possible to map by name calling
MapByName().
using AutoMapper.Extensions.EnumMapping;
57
AutoMapper Documentation
.MapValue(Source.First, Destination.Default)
)
.ReverseMap(); // to support Destination to Source mapping, including
˓→custom mappings of ConvertUsingEnumMapping
}
}
...
The package AutoMapper.Extensions.EnumMapping will map all values from Source type to Destination type if both
enum types have the same value (or by name or by value). All Source enum values which have no Target equivalent,
will throw an exception if EnumMappingValidation is enabled.
For method ReverseMap the same convention is used as for default mappings, but it also respects override enum
value mappings if possible.
The following steps determines the reversed overrides:
1. Create mappings for Source to Destination (default convention), including custom overrides.
2. Create mappings for Destination to Source (default convention), without custom overrides (must be de-
termined)
3. The mappings from step 1 will be used to determine the overrides for the ReverseMap. Therefore the map-
pings are grouped by Destination value.
3a) if there is a matching `Source` value for the `Destination` value, then that
˓→mapping is preferred and no override is needed
It is possible that a Destination value has multiple Source values specified by override mappings.
We have to determine which Source value will be the new Destination for the current Destination
value (which is the new Source value)
For every Source value per grouped Destination value:
3b) if the `Source` enum value does not exists in the `Destination` enum type,
˓→then that mapping cannot reversed
3d) if the `Source` value is not excluded by option b and c, the that `Source`
˓→value is the new `Destination` value.
4. All overrides which are determined in step 3 will be applied to mappings from step 2.
5. Finally, the custom mappings provided to method ReverseMap will be applied.
19.4 Testing
AutoMapper provides a nice tooling for validating typemaps. This package adds an extra
EnumMapperConfigurationExpressionExtensions.EnableEnumMappingValidation exten-
sion method to extend the existing AssertConfigurationIsValid() method to validate also the enum
mappings.
To enable testing the enum mapping configuration:
configuration.AddMaps(typeof(AssemblyInfo).GetTypeInfo().Assembly);
});
// Assert
config.AssertConfigurationIsValid();
}
}
19.4. Testing 59
AutoMapper Documentation
Sometimes, you need to take complete control over the conversion of one type to another. This is typically when one
type looks nothing like the other, a conversion function already exists, and you would like to go from a “looser” type
to a stronger type, such as a source type of string to a destination type of Int32.
For example, suppose we have a source type of:
If we were to try and map these two types as-is, AutoMapper would throw an exception (at map time and configuration-
checking time), as AutoMapper does not know about any mapping from string to int, DateTime or Type. To create
maps for these types, we must supply a custom type converter, and we have three ways of doing so:
The first option is simply any function that takes a source and returns a destination (there are several overloads too).
This works for simple cases, but becomes unwieldy for larger ones. In more difficult cases, we can create a custom
ITypeConverter<TSource, TDestination>:
61
AutoMapper Documentation
And supply AutoMapper with either an instance of a custom type converter, or simply the type, which AutoMapper
will instantiate at run time. The mapping configuration for our above source/destination types then becomes:
[Test]
public void Example()
{
var configuration = new MapperConfiguration(cfg => {
cfg.CreateMap<string, int>().ConvertUsing(s => Convert.ToInt32(s));
cfg.CreateMap<string, DateTime>().ConvertUsing(new DateTimeTypeConverter());
cfg.CreateMap<string, Type>().ConvertUsing<TypeTypeConverter>();
cfg.CreateMap<Source, Destination>();
});
configuration.AssertConfigurationIsValid();
};
{
return System.Convert.ToDateTime(source);
}
}
In the first mapping, from string to Int32, we simply use the built-in Convert.ToInt32 function (supplied as a method
group). The next two use custom ITypeConverter implementations.
The real power of custom type converters is that they are used any time AutoMapper finds the source/destination pairs
on any mapped types. We can build a set of custom type converters, on top of which other mapping configurations
use, without needing any extra configuration. In the above example, we never have to specify the string/int conversion
again. Where as Custom Value Resolvers have to be configured at a type member level, custom type converters are
global in scope.
Although AutoMapper covers quite a few destination member mapping scenarios, there are the 1 to 5% of destination
values that need a little help in resolving. Many times, this custom value resolution logic is domain logic that can go
straight on our domain. However, if this logic pertains only to the mapping operation, it would clutter our source types
with unnecessary behavior. In these cases, AutoMapper allows for configuring custom value resolvers for destination
members. For example, we might want to have a calculated value just during mapping:
public class Source
{
public int Value1 { get; set; }
public int Value2 { get; set; }
}
For whatever reason, we want Total to be the sum of the source Value properties. For some other reason, we can’t or
shouldn’t put this logic on our Source type. To supply a custom value resolver, we’ll need to first create a type that
implements IValueResolver:
public interface IValueResolver<in TSource, in TDestination, TDestMember>
{
TDestMember Resolve(TSource source, TDestination destination, TDestMember
˓→destMember, ResolutionContext context);
The ResolutionContext contains all of the contextual information for the current resolution operation, such as source
type, destination type, source value and so on. An example implementation:
public class CustomResolver : IValueResolver<Source, Destination, int>
{
public int Resolve(Source source, Destination destination, int member,
˓→ResolutionContext context)
63
AutoMapper Documentation
Once we have our IValueResolver implementation, we’ll need to tell AutoMapper to use this custom value resolver
when resolving a specific destination member. We have several options in telling AutoMapper a custom value resolver
to use, including:
• MapFrom<TValueResolver>
• MapFrom(typeof(CustomValueResolver))
• MapFrom(aValueResolverInstance)
In the below example, we’ll use the first option, telling AutoMapper the custom resolver type through generics:
result.Total.ShouldEqual(12);
Although the destination member (Total) did not have any matching source member, specifying a custom resolver
made the configuration valid, as the resolver is now responsible for supplying a value for the destination member.
If we don’t care about the source/destination types in our value resolver, or want to reuse them across maps, we can
just use “object” as the source/destination types:
return destMember * 2;
}
}
Because we only supplied the type of the custom resolver to AutoMapper, the mapping engine will use reflection to
create an instance of the value resolver.
If we don’t want AutoMapper to use reflection to create the instance, we can supply it directly:
AutoMapper will use that specific object, helpful in scenarios where the resolver might have constructor arguments or
need to be constructed by an IoC container.
Note that the value you return from your resolver is not simply assigned to the destination property. Any map that
applies will be used and the result of that mapping will be the final destination property value. Check the execution
plan.
By default, AutoMapper passes the source object to the resolver. This limits the reusability of resolvers, since the
resolver is coupled to the source type. If, however, we supply a common resolver across multiple types, we configure
AutoMapper to redirect the source value supplied to the resolver, and also use a different resolver interface so that our
resolver can get use of the source/destination members:
// logic here
}
}
When calling map you can pass in extra objects by using key-value and using a custom resolver to get the object from
context.
cfg.CreateMap<Source, Dest>()
.ForMember(dest => dest.Foo, opt => opt.MapFrom((src, dest, destMember, context)
˓→=> context.Items["Foo"]));
21.5 ForPath
Similar to ForMember, from 6.1.0 there is ForPath. Check out the tests for examples.
For each property mapping, AutoMapper attempts to resolve the destination value before evaluating the condition. So
it needs to be able to do that without throwing an exception even if the condition will prevent the resulting value from
being used.
As an example, here’s sample output from BuildExecutionPlan (displayed using ReadableExpressions) for a single
property:
try
{
var resolvedValue =
{
try
{
return // ... tries to resolve the destination value here
}
catch (NullReferenceException)
{
return null;
}
catch (ArgumentNullException)
{
return null;
}
};
The default generated code for resolving a property, if you haven’t customized the mapping for that member, generally
doesn’t have any problems. But if you’re using custom code to map the property that will crash if the condition isn’t
met, the mapping will fail despite the condition.
This example code would fail:
// ...
CreateMap<SourceClass, TargetClass>()
.ForMember(d => d.ValueLength, o => o.MapFrom(s => s.Value.Length))
.ForAllMembers(o => o.Condition((src, dest, value) => value != null));
The condition prevents the Value property from being mapped onto the target, but the custom member mapping would
fail before that point because it calls Value.Length, and Value is null.
Prevent this by using a PreCondition instead or by ensuring the custom member mapping code can complete safely
regardless of conditions:
Conditional Mapping
AutoMapper allows you to add conditions to properties that must be met before that property will be mapped.
This can be used in situations like the following where we are trying to map from an int to an unsigned int.
class Foo{
public int baz;
}
class Bar {
public uint baz;
}
In the following mapping the property baz will only be mapped if it is greater than or equal to 0 in the source object.
22.1 Preconditions
Similarly, there is a PreCondition method. The difference is that it runs sooner in the mapping process, before the
source value is resolved (think MapFrom). So the precondition is called, then we decide which will be the source of
the mapping (resolving), then the condition is called and finally the destination value is assigned.
69
AutoMapper Documentation
Null Substitution
Null substitution allows you to supply an alternate value for a destination member if the source value is null anywhere
along the member chain. This means that instead of mapping from null, it will map from the value you supply.
dest.Value.ShouldEqual("Other Value");
dest.Value.ShouldEqual("Not null");
The substitute is assumed to be of the source member type, and will go through any mapping/conversion after to the
destination type.
71
AutoMapper Documentation
Value Converters
Value converters are a cross between Type Converters and Value Resolvers. Type converters are globally scoped, so
that any time you map from type Foo to type Bar in any mapping, the type converter will be used. Value converters
are scoped to a single map, and receive the source and destination objects to resolve to a value to map to the destination
member. Optionally value converters can receive the source member as well.
In simplified syntax:
• Type converter = Func<TSource, TDestination, TDestination>
• Value resolver = Func<TSource, TDestination, TDestinationMember>
• Member value resolver = Func<TSource, TDestination, TSourceMember,
TDestinationMember>
• Value converter = Func<TSourceMember, TDestinationMember>
To configure a value converter, use at the member level:
You can customize the source member when the source member name does not match:
73
AutoMapper Documentation
cfg.CreateMap<OrderLineItem, OrderLineItemDto>()
.ForMember(d => d.Total, opt => opt.ConvertUsing(new CurrencyFormatter(), src
˓→=> src.LITotal));
});
If you need the value converters instantiated by the service locator, you can specify the type instead:
cfg.CreateMap<OrderLineItem, OrderLineItemDto>()
.ForMember(d => d.Total, opt => opt.ConvertUsing<CurrencyFormatter, decimal>
˓→());
});
If you do not know the types or member names at runtime, use the various overloads that accept System.Type and
string-based members:
cfg.CreateMap(typeof(OrderLineItem), typeof(OrderLineItemDto))
.ForMember("Total", opt => opt.ConvertUsing(new CurrencyFormatter(), "LITotal
˓→"));
});
Value converters are only used for in-memory mapping execution. They will not work for ProjectTo.
Value Transformers
Value transformers apply an additional transformation to a single type. Before assigning the value, AutoMapper will
check to see if the value to be set has any value transformations associated, and will apply them before setting.
You can create value transformers at several different levels:
• Globally
• Profile
• Map
• Member
dest.Value.ShouldBe("Hello!!!");
75
AutoMapper Documentation
Occasionally, you might need to perform custom logic before or after a map occurs. These should be a rarity, as it’s
more obvious to do this work outside of AutoMapper. You can create global before/after map actions:
int i = 10;
mapper.Map<Source, Dest>(src, opt => {
opt.BeforeMap((src, dest) => src.Value = src.Value + i);
opt.AfterMap((src, dest) => dest.Name = HttpContext.Current.Identity.Name);
});
The latter configuration is helpful when you need contextual information fed into before/after map actions.
You can encapsulate Before and After Map Actions into small reusable classes. Those classes need to implement the
IMappingAction<in TSource, in TDestination> interface.
Using the previous example, here is an encapsulation of naming some objects “John”:
{
public void Process(SomePersonObject source, SomeOtherPersonObject destination,
˓→ResolutionContext context)
{
(continues on next page)
77
AutoMapper Documentation
}
}
API Changes
Starting with version 9.0, you can find out what changed in the public API from the last major version release. From
the releases page you can reach the source code for that release and the version of ApiCompatBaseline.txt in that tree
will tell you what changed. A major version release is compared with the previous major version release (so 9.0.0 with
8.0.0) and a minor version release with the current major version release (so 9.1.1 with 9.0.0).
81
AutoMapper Documentation
Release notes.
That applies per map and also per member. For example, you can have only one type converter per map and only one
resolver per member.
It might not be obvious that some settings are equivalent. For example, a value converter is a special kind of resolver,
so a ConvertUsing will overwrite a MapFrom for the same member.
You also cannot have for the same map/member separate configurations for Map and ProjectTo.
Another possible occurence is with ForAllMaps and ForAllPropertyMaps when it’s possible to overwrite
things already set in a particular map.
You should use ResolutionContext.Items to access the items passed in the Map call.
Instead of ServiceCtor, you should use dependency injection or pass the needed objects in the Map call.
We’ve simplified the implementation for performance reasons. If that doesn’t work for you, you can write your own
naming convention. Rather than address every peculiarity, we prefer to have a simple and fast implementation that
covers most cases.
83
AutoMapper Documentation
Release notes.
29.1 AutoMapper now targets .Net Standard 2.1 and doesn’t work on
.Net Framework
Some APIs were hidden for normal usage. To light them up, you need to add an using for AutoMapper.
Internal and call the Internal extension method on the configuration object. Most users don’t need these
advanced methods. Some expose internals and are not subject to the usual semantic versioning rules. To avoid such
tight coupling to AutoMapper, you should try to stick to the public API.
When calling Map with an existing readonly collection, such as IEnumerable<>, the setter will be used to replace
it. If you actually have to map into that collection, you need to change its type to a writable collection, such as
List<>, HashSet<>, ICollection<>, IList<> or IList. Alternatively, you can remove the setter or set
UseDestinationValue.
29.4 CreateProjection
If you don’t use Map, just ProjectTo, you should use CreateProjection instead of CreateMap. That way
you’ll use only the API subset supported by ProjectTo and start-up should be faster.
85
AutoMapper Documentation
It was removed for performance reasons. So it’s best not to use it anymore. But if you must, there is a sample in the
test project.
That was misleading for a lot of people. You can opt-in per map with AsProxy (and ForAllMaps if needed).
These were older attributes, unrelated to the newer attributes API. You can switch to the fluent API or implement the
attributes in your own code. Check the tests for sample code (here and here).
29.8 Global pre and postfixes are now applied in all maps
They used to be applied only in the global configuration, now they are applied in all profiles, consistent with how
settings work.
That was used to disable mapping by convention, not something we want to support. When only used for validation,
it can be replaced with MemberList.None.
These used to be ignored by default, but that’s expensive and most types don’t have them. So you have to explicitly
ignore them. Globally, with ShouldMapProperty or GlobalIgnores, or per member.
While you should get improvements without code changes, you can do even better. Definitely use
CreateProjection with ProjectTo. If you’re an advanced user and you’re confident in your test coverage,
you can disable any features you don’t need. Needless to say, do measure to see if these help in your particular case.
Release notes.
30.1 All collections are mapped by default, even if they have no setter
You’ll have to explicitly ignore those you don’t want mapped. See also this.
Not needed, because the context is passed by default, so you can change the context instance you already have.
87
AutoMapper Documentation
This used to be ignored for Map. Now it’s consistent with ProjectTo.
Due to a refactoring of IMapper, you might need to add a cast to object when mapping from dynamic.
Only simple source members expressions are considered, MapFrom(d => d.Member, s => s.
SourceMember).
30.9 MaxDepth
When reaching MaxDepth, destination collections are null/empty, they used to contain null values.
30.10 String based MapFrom-s are reversed now, also applies to at-
tribute mapping
You can always not use it and explicitly create the reverse map. Or ignore the reversed member.
You can always not use it and explicitly create the reverse map.
Switch to the instance based API, preferably using dependency injection. See here and here.
You will need to explicitly configure maps, manually or using reflection. Also consider attribute mapping.
89
AutoMapper Documentation
CreateMissingTypeMaps was deprecated and its default value changed to false. If you were relying on this,
your app will no longer work by default.
If you’re not interested in upgrading to 9.0, where dynamic mapping was removed, you should stick with 8.1.
Otherwise you can port your app gradually to 9.0 by creating the needed maps. Setting CreateMissingTypeMaps
to false will get you the 9.0 behavior and setting it to true will revert to the 8.1 behavior.
91
AutoMapper Documentation
33.1 ProjectUsing
// IMappingExpression
// Old
void ConvertUsing(Func<TSource, TDestination> mappingFunction);
void ProjectUsing(Expression<Func<TSource, TDestination>> mappingExpression);
// New
void ConvertUsing(Expression<Func<TSource, TDestination>> mappingExpression);
The change from Func to Expression may break some existing usages. Namely:
• ConvertUsing using lambda statements, method groups, or delegates
• Dual configuration of ProjectUsing and ConvertUsing
For the first case, you may either:
• Convert to a lambda expression
• Move to the Func-based overloads
The Func-based overloads accept more parameters, so you may have to add the parameters to your delegates.
93
AutoMapper Documentation
33.1.2 Motivation
Simplify overloads, and to make it clear that you cannot have separate configuration for LINQ projections vs. in-
memory mapping.
33.2 ConstructProjectionUsing
// IMappingExpression<TSource, TDestination>
// Old
IMappingExpression<TSource, TDestination> ConstructUsing(Func<TSource, TDestination>
˓→ctor);
// New
IMappingExpression<TSource, TDestination> ConstructUsing(Expression<Func<TSource,
˓→TDestination>> ctor);
// IMappingExpression
// Old
IMappingExpression ConstructUsing(Func<object, object> ctor);
IMappingExpression ConstructUsing(Func<object, ResolutionContext, object> ctor);
IMappingExpression ConstructProjectionUsing(LambdaExpression ctorExpression);
// New
IMappingExpression ConstructUsing(Expression<Func<object, object>> ctor);
IMappingExpression ConstructUsing(Func<object, ResolutionContext, object> ctor);
The change from Func to Expression may break some existing usages. Namely:
• ConstructUsing using lambda statements, method groups, or delegates
• Dual configuration of ConstructProjectionUsing and ConstructUsing
For the first case, you may either:
• Convert to a lambda expression
• Move to the Func-based overload
The Func-based overload accepts more parameters, so you may have to add the parameters to your delegates.
33.2.2 Motivation
Simplify overloads, and to make it clear that you cannot have separate configuration for LINQ projections vs. in-
memory mapping.
33.3 ResolveUsing
// IMappingExpression
// Old
void ResolveUsing(Func<TSource, TDestination> mappingFunction);
void ResolveUsing(Func<TSource, TDestination, TDestination> mappingFunction);
void ResolveUsing<TResult>(Func<TSource, TDestination, TMember, TResult>
˓→mappingFunction);
// New
void MapFrom(Expression<Func<TSource, TDestination>> mappingExpression);
void MapFrom<TResult>(Func<TSource, TDestination, TResult> mappingFunction);
void MapFrom<TResult>(Func<TSource, TDestination, TMember, TResult> mappingFunction);
The change from Func to Expression may break some existing usages. Namely:
• ResolveUsing using lambda statements, method groups, or delegates
• Dual configuration of ResolveUsing and MapFrom
For the first case, you may either:
• Convert to a lambda expression
• Move to the Func-based overloads
The Func-based overloads accept more parameters, so you may have to add the parameters to your delegates.
33.3.2 Motivation
Simplify overloads, and to make it clear that you cannot have separate configuration for LINQ projections vs. in-
memory mapping.
33.4 UseValue
Underneath the covers, UseValue called MapFrom. UseValue consolidated with MapFrom.
33.3. ResolveUsing 95
AutoMapper Documentation
// Old
cfg.CreateMap<Source, Dest>()
.ForMember(dest => dest.Date, opt => opt.UseValue(DateTime.Now));
// New
cfg.CreateMap<Source, Dest>()
.ForMember(dest => dest.Date, opt => opt.MapFrom(src => DateTime.Now));
This can be simplified to a global find and replace of UseValue( with MapFrom(src => .
33.4.1 Motivation
To make the underlying configuration more explicit. Historically, MapFrom only allowed mapping from an individual
source member. This restriction went away with 5.0, so there is no longer a need for additional redundant configuration
options originally meant to work around this restriction.
// Old
cfg.CreateMap<Source, Dest>()
.ForSourceMember(source => source.Date, opt => opt.Ignore());
// New
cfg.CreateMap<Source, Dest>()
.ForSourceMember(source => source.Date, opt => opt.DoNotValidate());
Generic maps are now validated. The generic map itself is validated at configuration time for the non generic members,
so AssertConfigurationIsValid should catch errors for those. And the closed generic map will be validated when it’s
used, possibly at runtime. If you don’t care about those errors, you need to override them.
34.1 Initialization
34.2 Profiles
Instead of overriding a Configure method, you configure directly via the constructor:
A popular Stack Overflow post introduced the idea of ignoring all non-existing members on the destination type. It
used things that don’t exist anymore in the configuration API. This functionality is really only intended for configura-
tion validation.
In 5.0, you can use ReverseMap or CreateMap passing in the MemberList enum to validate against the source members
(or no members). Any place you have this IgnoreAllNonExisting extension, use the CreateMap overload that validates
against the source or no members:
97
AutoMapper Documentation
cfg.CreateMap<ProductDto, Product>(MemberList.None);
ResolutionContext used to capture a lot of information, source and destination values, along with a hierarchical parent
model. For source/destination values, all of the interfaces (value resolvers and type converters) along with config
options now include the source/destination values, and if applicable, source/destination members.
If you’re trying to access some parent object in your model, you will need to add those relationships to your models
and access them through those relationships, and not through AutoMapper’s hierarchy. The ResolutionContext was
pared down for both performance and sanity reasons.
The signature of a value resolver has changed to allow access to the source/destination models. Additionally, the base
class is gone in favor of interfaces. For value resolvers that do not have a member redirection, the interface is now:
You have access now to the source model, destination model, and destination member this resolver is configured
against.
If you are using a ResolveUsing and passing in the FromMember configuration, this is now a new resolver interface:
{
TDestMember Resolve(TSource source, TDestination destination, TSourceMember
˓→sourceMember, TDestMember destMember, ResolutionContext context);
This is now configured directly as ForMember(dest => dest.Foo, opt => opt.
ResolveUsing<MyCustomResolver, string>(src => src.Bar)
The base class for a type converter is now gone in favor of a single interface that accepts the source and destination
objects and returns the destination object:
Previously, AutoMapper could handle circular references by keeping track of what was mapped, and on every mapping,
check a local hashtable of source/destination objects to see if the item was already mapped. It turns out this tracking
is very expensive, and you need to opt-in using PreserveReferences for circular maps to work. Alternatively, you can
configure MaxDepth:
// Self-referential mapping
cfg.CreateMap<Category, CategoryDto>().MaxDepth(3);
Starting from 6.1.0 PreserveReferences is set automatically at config time whenever the recursion can be detected
statically. If you’re still getting StackOverflowException, open an issue with a full repro and we’ll look into it.
34.8 UseDestinationValue
UseDestinationValue tells AutoMapper not to create a new object for some member, but to use the existing property
of the destination object. It used to be true by default. Consider whether this applies to your case. Check recent issues.
cfg.CreateMap<Source, Destination>()
.ForMember(d => d.Child, opt => opt.UseDestinationValue());
Examples
The source code contains unit tests for all of the features listed above. Use the GitHub search to find relevant examples.
101
AutoMapper Documentation
Housekeeping
103