Solid Waste Management
Solid Waste Management
Solid Waste Management
GENERATION(reuse),COLLECTION(segregation),TRANSFER(scavengers,salvanger,tot
ters),STORAGE(secregation),TRANSPORTATION(health
risks),DISPOSAL(recycling,composting-salvanging,inceneration-energy)
PREAMBLE
1. Collection,
2. Transportation,
3. Processing,
4. Recycling and/ or disposal of solid waste.
5. Salvaging.
Solid waste is the material arising from various human activities normally solids or semi-solids –
considered as useless or unwanted. Waste generation rates vary according to:
1. Geographical place,
2. Season of the year,
3. Collection frequency,
4. Characteristic of the population and extent of salvaging.
The term usually relates to materials produced by human activity, and the process is generally
undertaken to reduce their effect on health, the environment or aesthetics.
Waste management is a distinct practice from resource recovery which focuses on delaying the
rate of consumption of natural resources. All waste materials, whether they are solid, liquid,
gaseous or radioactive fall within the remit of waste management.
Waste management practices can differ for developed and developing nations, for urban and rural areas,
and for residential and industrial producers. Management of non-hazardous waste residential and
institutional waste in metropolitan areas is usually the responsibility of local government authorities,
while management for non-hazardous commercial and industrial waste is usually the responsibility of the
generator subject to local, national or international authorities
1. Solid wastes.
2. Liquid wastes.
There has been so much rapid progress in many countries that the past practices of handling
waste are becoming out-dated. This is mainly caused by the following factors:
1. Increased urbanization.
2. Changes in Environment.
3. Changes in building designs.
4. World inflation trends.
5. Industrial growth.
6. Advanced Technology.
7. Continuous changes in characteristics of waste of all classes.
Disposal of large volumes of wastes presents the difficulties of disposal sites, locations, and
adoptions of methods that will be economical and nuisance free.
Health problems may arise since some waste is attractive to insects, rodents, and always there is
possibility of such nuisance as odors and street litter.
UNIT 1
DEFINITION OF TERMS
1. Solid Waste: This is a sanitary term used to describe residues and end products of human
physical activities commonly referred to as refuse. They are the unwanted remains,
residues discarded by the initial user or producer.
2. Wastes: These are discarded by-products, residues, unwanted materials in the process of:
i. preparation,
ii. Packing,
iii. Manufacturing,
iv. Selling, or
v. Any other human activity either physical or physiological and such materials no
longer required by initial user.
Garbage requires careful handling with frequent removal and adequate disposal because it
attracts and breeds flies and other insects, supplies food for rats and rapidly ferments, resulting in
production of unpleasant odors.
Garbage is probably the most valuable component of refuse in that it yields fertilizer or soil
conditioner through composting process and is utilized as hog food.
4. Rubbish: This is a term used to describe non-putriscible waste [except ash] consisting of
combustible and non-combustible materials e.g. :
i. Cans,
ii. Glass,
iii. Paper,
iv. Brush,
v. Cardboard,
vi. Scrap metals,
vii. Beddings,
viii. Yard chippings,
ix. Crockery, and
x. Wood
Garbage and rubbish are difficult to separate entirely because those materials classed as rubbish
are often used to package food products, and therefore various amounts of garbage remain
attached to the package [paper, boxes, cans, bottles etc].
Rubbish is frequently responsible for the creation of nuisance when it becomes scattered by wind
and careless handling.
5. Refuse: These are putrescible and non-putrescible solid wastes with exception of body
wastes. Such wastes include:
i. Garbage.
ii. Rubbish.
iii. Ashes.
iv. Street sweepings
v. Dead animals.
vi. Market solid wastes, and
In Kenya today, the responsibility of collecting refuse lies with the county authorities. This
responsibility is given in the Local (county) government regulation 1963. It is the responsibility
of the county government to raise all the revenue for the maintenance of these services.
In many developed countries, domestic refuse collection is provided free of charge while trade
refuse collection is chargeable. There is no proper and legal definition of refuse and therefore the
county authority may decide what constitute and what does not constitute refuse. For the
purposes of public health awareness, refuse can be described as:
a) Unwanted,
b) Remains,
c) Residues,
d) Discard materials,
e) All by products of human activities in the process of:
i. Preparation,
ii. Manufacture,
iii. Packing,
iv. Re-packing,
v. Unpacking,
vi. Construction,
vii. Alterations, and
viii. Agricultural that is no longer required for further use by the initial user.
6. Ashes: These are by-product of coal and other fuel [cock, or wood] used for industrial
purposes and in homes for heating. Ash production varies greatly with geographical location
and season.
7. Street sweeping: These consist principally of materials from street surfaces, dirt, and
other materials dropped or worn away from:
i. Vehicles,
ii. Leaves,
iii. Sweeping from sidewalks and
iv. Bits of paper.
Street sweepings are not usually putrescible enough to cause concern as a possible fly breeding,
odor source and may frequently be used as fill, although some dust nuisance may be created.
11. Recyclable Materials: These are materials that can be re-cycled e.g. paper.
13. Dead Animals: These are all domestic and non-domestic animals [big and small]
14. Special Wastes: These are wastes which are hazardous e.g. hospital and radioactive
wastes.
15. Receptacle:
16. Litter:
17. Incineration:
18. Ash pit:
19. Composting:
20. Hazardous wastes:
21. Controlled tipping:
22. Toxic wastes:
23. Aesthetic:
24. Hazard:
25. Storage:
26. Disposal:
27. Salvage:
28. Salvage potential:
29. Cradle-to-grave:
30. Nimbly syndrome:
UNIT 2
The central objective of waste policy is to reduce the harmful health and environmental impacts
of waste. In order to meet this objective, it is particularly important to:
1) Prevent the generation of waste
2) Promote reuse of waste
3) Promote biological recovery of waste and recycling of materials
4) Promote energy use of waste not suited for recycling ensures that the treatment and
disposal of waste does not cause any harmful impacts.
The main climate-related objective of waste policy is to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions
generated by waste, particularly by reducing the methane emissions resulting from treatment at
landfills. In order to reach the objective, the amount of land filled biodegradable waste will be
NOTES FOR P.H.O STUDENTS BY O.E.AKOTH
5
substantially reduced, while at the same time measures will be taken to increase the recovery
rates of methane generated at landfills.
UNIT 3
We should look at the Middle Ages when towns and urban centers in form of villages had started
getting larger and larger and larger particularly in Europe. This called for organized solid waste
control and management and the services went into a period of great neglect.
This is the time when towns and urban centers in form of villages had stated getting larger and
larger particularly in countries in Europe. This called for solid waste control and management
because the services were in a period of great neglect. This is the period of crude disposal, where
natural agencies were left to do most of the jobs e.g.
1. Bacteria,
2. Animals,
3. Wind,
4. Rain, and
5. Varying temperatures.
1. Dogs
2. Pigs
3. Goats, and
4. Cows proved to be very effective scavengers.
These agencies alone could not contain the situation and this prompted the authorities to think of
haulage hence development of horse cats for removal of wastes.
In Britain, there were regulations on control of wastes as early as 1294, forbidding residents from
dumping wastes near their houses making it an offence which carried heavy fines.
Poor sanitation continued until the middle of 19th century when little was done to keep urban
centers and other common areas clean and tidy. It is during this period that the western countries
In Kenya, Public Health Ordinance was enacted in 1921and it detailed the by-laws covering
conservancy services in the city of Nairobi, Mombasa municipalities. There is no doubt today in
the minds of all health officers and the community as a whole that the management of both solid
and liquid wastes forms the most essential service and a major branch of Environmental and
Public Health Services.
The Midden People: [Midden is defined as a mound of domestic refuse containing shells and
animal bones marking the site of a prehistoric settlement or a heap of dung or refuse].
The evidence available today shows that the early man had continued to to develop awareness
and the need to control wastes.
In East Africa, wastes were handled differently by different communities. There was greater
problem with animal wastes since families used to keep large herds of animals e.g. cattle, sheep
and goats. Cows used to be housed in large bomas at night for security reasons. Goats and sheep
used to to put up in huts sometimes with families. This necessitated removal regularly of wastes
either from the hut or boma. Some tribes used to move to new grounds to get away from
accumulated wastes.
Moving a house is always an expensive undertaking so it was in the early days. This resulted into
developing controlled dumps. These were managed differently by defferent tribes e.g. “Luos”
used to have “duol” or “pith”, Kambas used to have “otunda”, “Kikuyus” used to have “kiara”
In Europe, they used to have midden. In Denmark similar dumps to the ones we had in East
Africa measuring 100m long, 50 meter wide and 1 meter high have been discovered. in
Scandinavia they were known as middens and had been foud to measure 350 m long, 70m wide
and 3m high.
1) Early Man Communities in East Africa Religion and Traditional Rituals: In Mosaic
Law, elaborate directions are given as to the personal cleanliness and Public Hygiene.
Accumulation of wastes, either in camps or tents was strictly forbidden. During the
offerings, bulls, and goats were slaughtered and hides, skins and offals had to be disposed
of by burial or cremation. The refuse of Jerusalem was taken to the valley of Ghena
(Tophet) where it was cast on fires that were kept burning all the time in order to prevent
nuisance and dangerous health.
It is from this early disposal of wastes that the incineration of today has been developed.
There has been so much rapid progress in many countries that the past practices of handling
wastes are becoming outdated. This is mainly caused by the following factors: There has been so
much rapid progress in many countries that the past practices of handling waste is becoming
outdated. This is mainly caused by the following factors:
1. Increased urbanization.
2. Environmental changes.
3. Industrial growth.
4. Changes in building design.
5. World inflation trend.
6. Advanced technology.
7. Continuous changes in characteristics of waste of all classes.
All these factors are not without risks which those who handle waste should know. These are:
1. Potential risk to health and environment from improper handling of solid wastes.
2. Direct health risks to those handling wastes.
3. Specific risks in handling hospital wastes.
It is therefore important that solid wastes should be properly disposed of because of the
following reasons:
This results in unsightliness and offensive accumulation of wastes which in turn results in
emission of offensive odors, fly breeding and nuisance, rodent breeding and nuisance,
underground water source pollution, environmental pollution and littering.
These are:
1. Domestic premises
2. Catering premises
3. Offices.
4. Institutions.
5. Kitchens.
6. Commercial premises.
7. Hospitals.
8. Industrial areas.
9. Street sweepings.
10. Agricultural activities.
UNIT 4
1. Domestic wastes.
2. Industrial wastes.
3. Trade wastes/commercial wastes.
4. Agricultural wastes.
5. Debris.
6. Junks.
7. Hospital wastes.
8. Dead animals.
9. Street sweepings.
Need to Classify Waste: Classification of wastes will help public health personnel with the
following:
Due to lack of clear definition of refuse, there are problems where there are different types of
refuse. One would classify refuse as domestic since those using hotels are not producing
domestic refuse in their homes.
Different types of waste calls for different methods of storage and transportation e.g. in many
cases:
1. Garden waste is bulky and calls for a large bounded vehicle e.g. Lorries and tippers.
2. Domestic and commercial waste needs sophiscated- high- ratio- compaction vehicles.
3. Street waste is not bulky but is extremely heavy due to materials such as:
i. Dust.
ii. Metal.
iii. Bones, and other parts caused by rapid wear and tear of services due to the constant
usage by the road transport vehicles.
Classification may also be based on the type of waste e.g. garbage, ashes, etc or on the source of
wastes e.g. domestic, trade, street etc.
i. food wastes,
ii. sweepings,
iii. cleanings,
iv. fuel burnings and
v. garden wastes,
vi. old clothing,
vii. old appliances,
viii. packaging and
ix. reading materials
N/B: Areas where bucket latrines are used, fecal matter is included as a classification.
i. Stores,
ii. Offices,
iii. Fuel service stations,
iv. Restaurants,
v. Ware houses, and
vi. Hotels.
i. Schools,
ii. Government Offices
iii. Hospitals etc.
School and government offices wastes are composed of paper and food.
Hospital (special) wastes need private collection and disposal. The wastes should be separated
first,
4. Street Sweepings: dirt and litter [Rubbish carelessly dropped or left about (especially in
public places)]. They may also include house hold refuse, drain cleanings and animal
manure.
5. Construction and Demolition debris: These depend on resources for construction
purposes.
6. Sanitary Residues: These include:
i. Night soil: mainly in developing countries where sewerage is not a major means
of managing human excreta and sullage
a) Packaging materials,
b) Food wastes,
c) Spoiled metals,
d) Plastics,
e) Textiles,
f) Fuel burnings and
g) Spilled processing chemicals.
The composition of municipal waste varies greatly from country to country and changes
significantly with time.
1. Biodegradable waste: food and kitchen waste, green waste, paper (can also be recycled).
2. Recyclable material: paper, glass, bottles, cans, metals, certain plastics, fabrics, clothes, batteries
etc.
3. Inert waste: construction and demolition waste, dirt, rocks, debris.
4. Electrical and electronic waste: - electrical appliances, TVs, computers, screens, etc.
5. Composite wastes: waste clothing, Tetra Packs, waste plastics such as toys.
6. Hazardous waste: including most paints, chemicals, light bulbs, fluorescent tubes, spray cans,
fertilizer and containers
7. Toxic waste : including pesticide, herbicides, fungicides
8. Medical waste.
9. Hazardous waste :including most paints, chemicals, light bulbs, fluorescent tubes, spray cans,
fertilizer and containers.
10. Medical waste.
Components of solid waste management: The municipal solid waste industry has four
components:
1. recycling,
2. composting,
3. land filling, and
4. Waste-to-energy via incineration.
The primary steps are generation, collection, sorting and separation, transfer, and disposal.
Activities in which materials are identified as no longer being of value and are either thrown out
or gathered together for disposal.
UNIT 5
Refuse Yield: The quantity and nature of refuse produced is significantly related to:
1. Geographical locations.
2. Class of the community, and
In Nairobi, the average yield of refuse is approximately1kg per capita per day. This gives
Nairobi an approximate yield of which must be:
i. Collected,
ii. Stored,
iii. Removed,
iv. Transported, and disposed of in a sanitary manner.
For all practical purposes, one person produces 300kg or 1.5 cubic meters of refuse per day. The
output from a small a small house in urban center is approximately 0.083 per week. With the
increased standard of living as well as the changing trend of characteristics of wastes, these
figures are bound to change rapidly and should be reviewed from time to time by means of
refuse analysis.
Refuse analysis: The need for accurate analysis of solid wastes was appreciated many years ago
by the institute of Solid Waste Management. The institute formulated the first the first solid
wastes analysis in 1936. It was then possible to show:
The changes in wastes produced today calls for even more accurate analysis.
To determine accurate analysis, one has to take into consideration the seasonal variations.
In Kenya we have either a wet or a dry season. Samples taken during a wet season will contain
high percentage of ash, dust and cinder, while that of very dry season will contain a high
percentage of waste papers and plastic. A sample taken during an average cool weather e.g. the
months of May, June or July would represent a year’s sample. Experience however shows that
three good samples are essential in a year which would assist one to calculate averages. The
When taking samples, it is recommended that at least 1,000 kg of waste should be sampled. This
weight will represent a constituent of wastes.
1. A housing estate,
2. High class private houses,
3. Middle class residential area,
4. Multistory flats,
5. Shanties,
In cool climates the Institute of Solid Wastes Management recommends for major samples as
follows:
1. Fine Dust: These are particles under 1.27 cm which includes ash.
2. Cinder: These are particles between 1.27 cm and 4.4 cm
3. Vegetable and putriceable mater,
4. Paper and cardboards,
5. Metal, both ferrous and non-ferrous,
6. Textile (rags): These include bagging and trims,
7. Glass: These include bottles, jars and cullet plastics,
8. Unclassified mater: This includes wood, stones, leather e.t.c.
The analysis of solid wastes in complete details is always not easy as it calls for separation into
nine classes. This is so because of a wide variety of waste materials.
Average quantity of refuse produced by a community depends largely on the standards of living
of the people and the nature of the town; residential, commercial or industrial. It may also
depend on the season. It has been found out that high class families generate more wastes than
lower class families.
A lot of paper, tins, rubber, and plastics are generated from high class families. Low class
families generate more dust, cinder, vegetable matter and textiles.
Storage facilities are classified as primary or individual and secondary or communal storage
facilities. The storage volume required for house hold waste is a function of the:
Storage capacities required for commercial and institutional premises are determined by:
1. Premise size,
2. Nature of waste generated, and
3. Generation rate.
Solid Wastes should be stored in dry containers to avoid nuisances from smell and early
decomposition.
1. Dustbin.
2. Water-proof sacks.
3. Waste paper basket.
4. Drums [not widely recommended].
5. Standard containers [larger than dustbin]
6. Bag containers.
7. Trailer systems for refuse storage: This type of storage is used in markets, hotels, and
industries. It is used together with articulated vehicle. Trailers which are closed and
cylindrical are used. They have loaders with sliding doors. It is an interchangeable
system. They are kept at the back yard or in an enclosure for security.
8. On-site compaction system: this system is common in hotels and provision stores where
refuse is put in containers and compressed to maximize use of the container.
9. Deva systems for waste paper: This is a hydraulic compression with paper sacks. It was
originally a Swedish innovation which has now been developed to the today Deva system
which provides for refuse to be loaded in sacks and then compressed.
The first one is where refuse is refuse is brought to a central place and manually fed into
the machine and compressed in paper sacks.
1. Factories.
2. Catering estabshments.
3. Large building s where there is no refuse chute.
4. Office wastes and other light refuse.
The Deva Rotary Machine is fitted beneath the chute in a large block of flats or offices. There
are several models in the market, some suitable for light refuse, such as office refuse and those
that are suitable for domestic refuse which is slightly heavier than the office refuse. It has been
possible to install a machine to handle refuse from 100 masionettes.
The ratio of compaction of these machines has been recorded to 3:1 which means great reduction
of volume of refuse at the source.
1. Where refuse is fed into the chute and falls to the bottom, it strikes a contact rod in the
refuse compressor and then drops into the paper sack beneath.
2. The movement of the contact rod actuates a plate which blocks off the chte for the period
of compressing cycle.
3. The cycle is repeated until the sack is filled to a predetermined level.
4. At this stage the turntable automatically moves until the adjoining empty sack is brought
under the chute and the process is continued until all sacks are filled.
The care taker is only needed to remove the filled sacks and replace them with empty ones.
The pressure applied on the room could be varied to suit the density of refuse for compression
and also to provide a suitable weight for the full sack depending on whether it is to be carried or
wheeled on a trolley.
A compressed sack weight varies between 18kg per sack and 27kg per sack.
11. Refuse chutes: Building code 140,(1) says, unless alternative means of refuse disposal,
satisfactory to the council are provided, refuse chutes shall be installed in:
(2) Refuse chute may be required by the council if it is in the opinion of the council that
any other means of refuse disposal is impracticable.
NOTES FOR P.H.O STUDENTS BY O.E.AKOTH
18
(3) Every chute to be fitted with an approved container.
UNIT 6
Resource recovery is a process of recovering energy and reusable materials from solid waste
before their decomposition or land-filling. Million tones of solid waste is generated everyday due
to industrial and domestic activities and this solid waste was land-filled or decomposed earlier
without being reused or extracting the materials that could have been reused.
Resource Recovery: This led to the rapid exploitation of mineral resources and put extra burden
on natural reserves to meet the demand of energy to sustain growth and maintaining lifestyle.
The consequences are the depleting natural reserves and resources of energy.
As the awareness about environmental issues spread across the borders, measures were taken to
utilize the resources to full extent. Principle of 3R (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle) were followed to
tap the hidden energy potential of the resources by reusing and recycling the materials to the
extent possible.
2. Once the materials are used for their primary purpose, reuse them for some
secondary purpose. e.g if you have got your print outs on a plain white paper, you
can use the other side of the paper once the project is over and the papers are no
longer needed. In this manner you can save considerable amount of trees to been
cut down to meet the demand of papers.
3. Recycling is the next stage of reuse. Most of the materials can be recycled for use
and recycled again and again till their properties are useful and are not degraded
to an extent that can prevent their effective use.
Resource recovery is one of the processes to achieve this goal. The aim of this process is to make
the best use of these materials before they are permanently decomposed or land filled. The same
principle of 3R is followed here with the following hierarchy:
Resource recovery has helped governments to reduce the solid wastes and has efficiently cut
down the cost of their disposal.
Recycling: Recycling is a resource recovery practice that refers to the collection and reuse of
waste materials such as empty beverage containers. The materials from which the items are made
can be reprocessed into new products. Material for recycling may be collected separately from
general waste using dedicated bins and collection vehicles are sorted directly from mixed waste
streams and are known as kerb-side recycling, it requires the owner of the waste to separate it
into various different bins (typically wheelie bins) prior to its collection.
The most common consumer products recycled include aluminium such as beverage cans,
copper such as wire, steel from food and aerosol cans, old steel furnishings or equipment,
polyethylene and PET bottles, glass bottles and jars, paperboard cartons, newspapers, magazines
and light paper, and corrugated fiberboard boxes.
PVC, LDPE, PP, and PS (see resin identification code) are also recyclable. These items are
usually composed of a single type of material, making them relatively easy to recycle into new
products. The recycling of complex products (such as computers and electronic equipment) is
more difficult, due to the additional dismantling and separation required.
Sustainability
The most common consumer products recycled include aluminium such as beverage cans,
copper such as wire, steel from food and aerosol cans, old steel furnishings or equipment,
polyethylene and PET bottles, glass bottles and jars, paperboard cartons, newspapers, magazines
and light paper, and corrugated fiberboard boxes.
PVC, LDPE, PP, and PS (see resin identification code) are also recyclable. These items are
usually composed of a single type of material, making them relatively easy to recycle into new
products. The recycling of complex products (such as computers and electronic equipment) is
more difficult, due to the additional dismantling and separation required.
The type of material accepted for recycling varies by city and country. Each city and country has
different recycling programs in place that can handle the various types of recyclable materials.
However, certain variation in acceptance is reflected in the resale value of the material once it is
reprocessed.
Scavenging for our purposes means removing any items from a recycling center or the landfill
once it has been place in or on county property to be discarded. Scavenging comes with a $25.00
fine for the first offense. Subsequent violations will incur higher penalties.
Potential scavenging: Many developing cities are overwhelmed with solid waste,
collecting only 50% of the wastes generated each day. There are approximately 68 million waste
scavengers worldwide. These informal workers can close the gap, helping cities develop
sustainable solutions that meet environmental, social and economic goals.
Waste is a valuable resource throughout history. Scavenging has been a response to resource
scarcity, which was the driving force of informal collection, recycling and disposal up through
the 19th Century (in the developed world). It has also been an adaptive response to poverty and
lack of economic opportunity, particularly for migrants in rapidly urbanizing cities, not just
recently (as seen in the developing world) but throughout American history (see p. 42).
Scavenging in this period of industrial and urban development is also a response to resource
shortages as industrial demand increased. Three factors drive the informal waste economy:
increased urban population leads to increased waste; increased population density means there
are fewer places to put the waste; lots of people are willing to do this work (scarcity of other
options and potential economic gain from scavenging).
5 types of activities:
2. Scavengers as refuse collectors (cities lacked formalized collection). this has two
contexts, resource recovery/recycling and public service (maintaining public order)
3. Sorting plants (NYC - built plants between collection and disposal where people would
sort the waste - at first they did this for rights to the trash at no fee, eventually a fee was
charged for access to the waste).
5. at open dumps (scavengers paid to pick over the garbage, recovering up to 35%, saving
disposal costs and providing revenue through the fees).
Scavenging/informal sector participation in waste management fell out of favor in the early 20th
century in the developed world. In the argument between sanitation (public health) and resource
recovery, given the technology available at the end of the 19th century and scientific knowledge
of the time, sanitation won out. Cities banned or discouraged salvaging, particularly on open
dumps, and the strong ties between scavenging and resource dependent enterprise became
At the end of the 20th century the environmental impact of resource extraction and wasted
resources became more known. Recycling is now seen as a critical piece not only of resource
recovery, but cost savings as municipalities divert waste from filling expensive landfills, and
recover costs by selling valuable commodities such as paper and aluminum. Integrated waste
management (informal collection and scavenging along side techno-managerial approaches) is
now seen as a very effective means to resource recovery and waste reduction.
High market rates for recovered materials drives municipalities and scavengers to resource
recovery at the end of the 20th century. Aluminum and paper, in particular, have a high market
value. Municipalities in developed countries build up expensive capital (technology) in the form
of MRFs, collection vehicles, sanitary landfills, and look at recycling as a way to recover costs.
Scavenging increases during crisis such as war or economic crisis (see p 46-47 for specific
examples).
Given the technology that we now have available, scavenging has once again become a viable
option, particularly for low-income cities that may not have the municipal budget to set up costly
collection, recycling and disposal facilities. In these areas scavengers can facilitate collection,
can provide valuable feedstock to local industry and can help divert wastes from rapidly growing
landfills.
In modern cities, scavenging poses a threat to cost recovery. Cities invest large sums of money in
establishing the facilities for recycling, and scavenging renders these facilities useless, and
removes valuable materials from the cost recovery stream.
This sets up an adversarial (competitive) relationship between informal and formal sector actors
and those with power (the city) often win out. Cities enact laws to limit scavenging from public
and private bins. In many ways it is in the developing world's "best interests" (cost
recovery/profit) to advance and perpetuate the image of scavengers/dumpster divers as dirty,
scary, marginal people, and promote the use of low-labor high-capital approaches.
In many cities, they provide the only solid waste collection service. A methodological tool is
available, offering a systematic approach to include / integrate initiatives.
Terminologies: Many terms are used to refer to people who salvage recyclables from the
waste stream for sale or personal consumption. In English, these terms include rag picker,
reclaimer, informal resource recoverer, binner, recycler, poacher, salvager, scavenger, and
waste picker; in Spanish cartonero, chatarrero, pepenador, clasificador, minador and
reciclador; and in Portuguese catador de materiais recicláveis.[ A more contemporary term,
focusing on the outcome of the professional activity, is "informal sector recycling". However, the
word 'informal' can be partly misleading, because in practice a continuum between total
informality and proper organization in taxed registered formal activities may be encountered.
In 2008, participants of the First World Conference of Waste Pickers chose to use the term
"waste picker" for English usage to facilitate global communication. The term “scavenger” is
also commonly used, but many waste pickers find it demeaning due to the implied comparison
with animals.
A waste picker is different from a waste collector because the waste collected by the latter may
be destined for a landfill or incinerator, not necessarily for a recycling facility.
"Dumpster diving" generally refers to the practice of anti-consumer and freegan activists who
reclaim items such as food and clothes from the waste stream as a form of protest against
consumer culture. “Waste picking” generally refers to activity motivated purely by economic
need.
There is little reliable data about the number and demographics of waste pickers worldwide.
Most academic research on waste pickers is qualitative rather than quantitative. Systematic large
scale data collection is difficult due to the profession’s informal nature, porous borders,
seasonally fluctuating workforce, and widely dispersed and mobile worksites. Also, many
researchers are reluctant to produce quantitative data out of fear that it might be used to justify
crackdowns on waste picking by authorities. Thus, the large scale estimates that do exist are
mainly extrapolations based on very small original research samples. In his book, "The World's
Scavengers" (2007), Martin Medina provides a methodological guide to researching waste
picking.
In 1988, the World Bank estimated that 1–2% of the global population subsists by waste picking.
[
A more recent study from 2010 estimates that there are 1.5 million waste pickers in India alone.
Brazil, the country that collects the most robust official statistics on waste pickers, estimates that
nearly a quarter million of its citizens engage in waste picking.
NOTES FOR P.H.O STUDENTS BY O.E.AKOTH
26
Waste picker incomes vary vastly by location, form of work, and gender. Some waste pickers
live in extreme poverty, but many others earn multiple times their country’s minimum wage.
Recent studies indicate that waste pickers in Belgrade earn US $100 monthly, while waste
pickers in Cambodia typically earn $1 per day. Official statistics in Brazil indicate that men earn
more than women, regardless of age. Approximately two thirds of Brazil’s waste pickers are men
overall, but this proportion jumps to 98% in high income waste picker groups (those earning
between 3–4 times the minimum wage). No women were found in the highest income groups
(those earning over 10 times the minimum wage).
In developing countries: Over the past half century, in-country migration and increased
fertility rates have caused the population of cities in the developing world to mushroom. The
global population of urban dwellers is expected to double between 1987 and 2015, with 90% of
this growth occurring in developing countries. Much of the new population has settled in urban
slums and squatter settlements, which have expanded rapidly with no central planning. The
United Nations Habitat Report found that nearly one billion people worldwide live in slums,
about a third of the world’s urban dwellers.
The rapid urbanization greatly increased the demand for informal waste collecting services, as
cities lacked the infrastructure and resources to collect the totality of wastes generated by their
inhabitants. Despite spending 30–50% of operation budgets on waste management, developing
world cities today collect only 50–80% of refuse generated by inhabitants. Residents and
businesses often resort to burning garbage or disposing of it streets, rivers, vacant lots, and open
municipal dumps. This is a source of air, land, and water pollution that threatens human health
and the environment. Informal waste collectors help mitigate this harm by collecting recyclable
materials by foot or in pushcarts, tricycles, donkey carts, horse carts, and pickup trucks.
On the supply side, urbanization has facilitated the expansion of waste picking by creating a
large pool of unemployed and underemployed residents with few alternative means of earning a
livelihood. Known as “the one industry that is always hiring,” waste picking provides a cushion
for many who lose their jobs during times of war, crisis, and economic downturn in countries
that do not have welfare systems. It is also one of the few work opportunities available to people
who lack formal education or job experience.
Beginning in the mid-1990s, however, informal recycling in parts of the US and Western Europe
once again began to mushroom. Two factors fueled the boom: First, the demand for recycling
surged due to the increased waste stream, declining room in landfills, new recycling
technologies, and the efforts of environmentalists.[18] In 1985 only one roadside recycling
program existed in the US. By 1998, there were 9,000 such programs and 12,000 recyclable
drop-off centers.[19] Laws were passed in some states making it illegal not to recycle. Second,
changes in the political economy including the loss of manufacturing jobs, cutbacks to
government employment, and the roll back of the welfare state increased the ranks of the poor,
working poor, and homeless—thus there were more people disposed to wastepick as a full-time
profession or supplemental job.[2]
American waste pickers predominantly collect cans, bottles, and cardboard.[8] Many immigrants
work as waste pickers because language and documentation barriers limit their opportunities to
work elsewhere. Many homeless also work as waste pickers—some describe it as their only
alternative to panhandling. Some recyclers use vans to increase their yield while others work on
foot with carts. Anecdotal evidence suggests that most American waste pickers are male, as
waste picking is widely considered too dirty and strenuous a job for women. During an
ethnography of homeless recyclers in San Francisco, sociologist Teresa Gowan claims to have
met hundreds of male waste pickers, but only four female waste pickers.
Social and ecological benefits: Waste picking offers significant ecological, economic,
and social benefits:
2. Public health and sanitation: Waste pickers collect garbage from neighborhoods
that lack public services. Without waste pickers, residents would be forced to burn
trash, or dispose of it in rivers, streets and empty lots. Waste pickers provide the only
solid waste removal service in many cities.
3. Municipal savings: Waste pickers provide between 50 and 100% of waste collecting
services in most cities of the developing world, according to a 2010 UN Habitat
report. This is effectively serves as a mass subsidy for city governments, who do not
pay for the labor. Moreover, recycling expands the lifespan of city dumps and
landfills.
Social costs: Waste pickers not only generate social benefits, but also potential costs as well.
These include:
2. Child labor: Children commonly work as waste pickers. This may interfere with
their education, or harm their physical, emotional, and social well-being.
3. Litter: Waste pickers working on streets sometimes spread waste from trash bags,
sullying the sidewalk and creating more work for city street sweepers.
4. Public nuisance: Many people view waste pickers as a nuisance or source of shame
for their communities. Waste pickers' perceived poverty and lack of sanitation makes
some people uncomfortable or fearful. In developing countries especially, many argue
that modern services should replace waste pickers.
Occupational hazards:
1. Health risks: There is a high prevalence of infectious disease among waste pickers
due to their exposure to hazardous materials[25] such as fecal matter, paper saturated
by toxic materials, bottles and containers with chemical residues, contaminated
needles, and heavy metals from batteries. A study in Mexico City found the average
lifespan of a dumpsite waste collector to be 39 years, compared to the national
average of 69 years,[26] though a later World Bank study estimated life span to be 53
years. In Port Said, Egypt, a 1981 study showed an infant mortality rate of 1/3 among
waste pickers (one out of three babies dies before reaching age one).[28]
2. Risks of injury: Among the most common types of job-related injuries for waste
pickers are back and hand injuries caused by lifting heavy objects with little
equipment. In a study of 48 waste pickers in Santo André, Brazil, almost all workers
reported pain in the back, legs, shoulder, arms, and hands. Waste pickers who work in
open dumps are exposed to large amounts of toxic fumes, and face other severe
threats including being run over by trucks and caught in surface subsidence, trash
slides, and fires. On 10 July 2000, several hundred waste pickers were killed by a
trash slide from a huge garbage mountain after monsoon rains at an open dump in
Payatas, Philippines.
Waste picker organizing: Traditionally, scholars assumed that informal workers such as waste
pickers could not collectively organize due to structural barriers such as lack of legal protection,
widely dispersed worksites, porous borders to their profession, a culture of independence and
individualism, lack of institutional experience, and lack of money and time to build
Waste pickers use many organizational formats including cooperatives, associations, companies,
unions, and micro-enterprises. Despite the differences in format, most of these organizations
share three primary purposes. First, by pooling capital, establishing microenterprises, and
forming partnerships with business and government, waste collectors increase their selling
power. Second, by securing uniforms, safety equipment, and work permits, cooperatives increase
workplace dignity and safety. And third, by demanding recognition and compensation from the
state for their environmental and economic contributions, cooperatives increase members’
political might. These three functions—political influence, workplace dignity and safety, and
increased earnings—are mutually reinforcing, like legs on a stool.
Some waste pickers have created "women’s only" organizations, which seek to combat gender-
based discrimination at worksites and in communities. A study in Brazil indicates that women
are heavily overrepresented even in coed organizations, making up 56% of the membership
despite the fact that they represent only a third of the total waste picking population. [14]
Beginning in the 1990s, waste picker organizations in many parts of the world began uniting into
regional, national, and transnational coalitions to increase their political voice and economic
leverage. In March 2008, delegates from 30 countries gathered in Bogotá, Colombia for the first
World Conference (and Third Latin American Conference) of Waste Pickers (WIEGO 2008).
One of the key issues discussed was the global trend of privatization and concentration of waste
management systems. Normally, privatization is thought of as the handover of government
functions to the private sector, but in this case, privatization often means the transference of
services formerly provided by informal waste collectors to private firms. As waste streams have
expanded due to increased consumption, the waste management industry is becoming
increasingly lucrative. Governments around the world are granting private companies
monopolies on waste management systems, meaning that the cooperatives’ survival hinges on
building political and economic alliances needed to win contracts—often an uphill battle given
authorities’ distrust of waste collectors and the cooperatives’ lack of capital for modern
machinery.
Most municipal councils and city councils who are trusted with waste disposal in Kenya
dispose their waste at a disposal site (usually former quarry pits). Waste is emptied into
the pit without compaction.
Solid waste reclaimers have come in as a blessing. In Kenya, a few years ago it was not
common to see waste reclaimers and waste pickers but today they are a big part of the
waste management sector both in the residential areas and the cities.
However, little has been done to find various groups of Solid waste reclaimers and find
the organizations working and supporting reclaimers & interviewing them on how they
offer their support to the group members. There are plenty of Solid waste reclaimer
organizations especially in the slums having the same goals of making the environment
clean and organizations that support the reclaimer groups in the town ready to offer as
much support as they can, but there is still a long way to go when it comes to Solid Waste
Management in large scale.
The reclaimer groups are mostly in need of knowledge & skills concerned with solid
waste, trainings, financially support, by-laws which will govern them, infrastructure, tool
& equipment.
In a recent study in four major cities in Kenya the Municipal councils are supporting the
NOTES FOR P.H.O STUDENTS BY O.E.AKOTH
32
reclaimer groups because they recognize that while they can only manage 20% of the
solid waste, the reclaimers are managing 15% of solid waste without half as resources as
the municipal councils. In Kisumu such as the relationship between the Municipal and the
reclaimer groups is good because they give recognition letters & work permit to these
groups and offer transportation of the waste from transfer point to the dumping site. They
also give tools & equipments e.g. brooms, rakes, spades etc.
The need for sustainable and ecologically practical solutions to solid waste management
cannot be overstated. This must be driven by local solutions such as would be found in a
business approach to solid waste management. Everywhere one looks; we see models of
local sanitation businesses. These efforts however do not seem to have managed to bridge
the gap for financial services to these sector. As observed, local businesses are there but
faced with many challenges ranging from poor infrastructure for waste disposal, negative
public perception and little or minimal linkages with the major financiers mainly because
these venture are either too localized or not commercially viable for large-scale
financiers. Sustainable local solutions must not only positive attitude and supporting
legislations but also local financing.
As viewed from the waste management research done recently by Ecotact and WIEGO,
the waste reclaimers are often looked down upon as engaging in loathsome and dirty
work, in business term this shunning away has not only been at community level but also
by the financing institutions who perhaps do not see the profitable implication of a
partnership with these waste collectors. Opening space for the entrepreneur to interact is
therefore critical to opening up the local businesses to opportunities for financing.
Visibility of the local small and micro entrepreneur is compounded by the problem of
lack of representation of this critical sector in the larger sanitation provision forum.
Secondly, due to the often negative perception of the business, the entrepreneurs are not
sufficiently empowered to discuss their business.
The high demand for the services of the waste managers is clear as seen in interviews of
local waste pickers and organizations supporting them in Nairobi, Kisumu, Nakuru and
Mombasa. From a livelihood perspective it is seen as a means of profitable employment
that is able to sustain the needs of the entrepreneur, his employee(s) and families by
extension.
1) Recycling: Recycling is a resource recovery practice that refers to the collection and
reuse of waste materials such as empty beverage containers. The materials from which
the items are made can be reprocessed into new products. Material for recycling may be
collected separately from general waste using dedicated bins and collection vehicles are
sorted directly from mixed waste streams and are known as kerb-side recycling, it
requires the owner of the waste to separate it into various different bins (typically wheelie
bins) prior to its collection.
The most common consumer products recycled include aluminium such as beverage cans,
copper such as wire, steel from food and aerosol cans, old steel furnishings or equipment,
There are a number of concepts about waste management which vary in their usage between
countries or regions. Some of the most general, widely used concepts include:
1. Waste hierarchy - The waste hierarchy refers to the "3 Rs" reduce, reuse and recycle,
which classify waste management strategies according to their desirability in terms of
waste minimization. The waste hierarchy remains the cornerstone of most waste
minimization strategies. The aim of the waste hierarchy is to extract the maximum
practical benefits from products and to generate the minimum amount of waste
2. Polluter pays principle - the Polluter Pays Principle is a principle where the polluting
party pays for the impact caused to the environment. With respect to waste management,
this generally refers to the requirement for a waste generator to pay for appropriate
disposal of the unrecoverable material.
UNIT 7
Components of solid waste management: The municipal solid waste industry has four
components:
1. Generation,
2. Collection,
3. Sorting and
4. Separation,
5. Transfer, and
6. Disposal.
Activities in which materials are identified as no longer being of value and are either thrown out
or gathered together for disposal.
Collection: The functional element of collection includes not only the gathering of solid waste
and recyclable materials, but also the transport of these materials, after collection, to the location
where the collection vehicle is emptied. This location may be a materials processing facility, a
transfer station or a landfill disposal site.
Waste handling and separation involves activities associated with waste management until the
waste is placed in storage containers for collection. Handling also encompasses the movement of
loaded containers to the point of collection. Separating different types of waste components is an
important step in the handling and storage of solid waste at the source.
Transfer and transport: This element involves two main steps. First, the waste is
transferred from a smaller collection vehicle to larger transport equipment. The waste is then
transported, usually over long distances, to a processing or disposal site.
Disposal
Today, the disposal of wastes by land filling or land spreading is the ultimate fate of all solid
wastes, whether they are residential wastes collected and transported directly to a landfill site,
residual materials from materials recovery facilities (MRFs), residue from the combustion of
solid waste, compost, or other substances from various solid waste processing facilities. A
modern sanitary landfill is not a dump; it is an engineered facility used for disposing of solid
wastes on land without creating nuisances or hazards to public health or safety, such as the
breeding of insects and the contamination of ground water.
UNIT 8
DEVELOPMENT OF RECEPTACLES
There are various receptacles developed for collection and storage for various types of solid
wastes.
These are:
1. Dustbins.
2. Standard containers. These are larger than dustbins.
3. Bulk containers.
4. Sacks [water proof].
5. Baskets [waste paper baskets].
6. Drums [not widely recommended].
7. Bag containers.
8. Trailer system of waste storage.
9. Deva system.
10. Garchey system.
1. Standard dustbins.
2. Dustless loading dustbins.
3. Plastic dustbins.
1. STANDARD DUSTBIN: The Kenya Bureau of Standards has the national standard and
specifications for manufacturing dustbins. Today, dustbins ara manufactured under Kenya
National Standards number Ks 06-75. In the past however, locally distributed dustbins were
manufactured under British Standards of specifications number 792. specifications for the four
common sizes of dustbins are:
Plastic Dustbins
1. Re-enforced bar,
2. Defined diameters,
3. Tapering sides,
4. Suitable handles,
5. Bottom hoop,
6. Galvanized,
7. Weight tolerance of 5%,
8. Marking,
9. Various dimensions,
NOTES FOR P.H.O STUDENTS BY O.E.AKOTH
40
10. Metal gauges,
11. Effective volumes.
History: In the United Kingdom, the Public Health Act 1875 authorized municipal authorities
to remove and dispose of waste. The act also made it compulsory for household owners to take
out their household waste once a week for collection in a 'moveable receptacle' - the first known
mention of the modern day dustbin. They received their names due to the fact that one of the
most prominent forms of household waste at the time was coal fire ash.
Curbside waste containers: Curbside waste containers usually consist of three types:
All of these are emptied by collectors who will load the contents into a garbage truck and drive it
to a landfill, incinerator or crusher facility for disposal. The standard-sized UK wheelie bin
household collection is 240 litres or more.
In certain areas there is also a recycling service, often with one or more dedicated bins intended
to receive items that can be recycled into new products. These bins are sometimes separated into
different categories (usually represented by colours) which determine what materials can be
inserted into the bin. The contents of the bins are taken to a recycling plant to be processed, and
there are various systems for recycling-bin collection: single-bin-combined stream systems,
multiple-bin systems, and cyclic collections with different materials collected on different days.
In some countries there are large (500 cubic meters and more) waste containers serving several
buildings. Special garbage trucks have been developed for raising these heavy containers and
emptying them. Another option is a truck that replaces the container with a clean one, and takes
the whole container to the garbage depot where it is placed into a consuming crush and
destroyed.
Wheelie bins: The wheelie bin is a waste container on wheels designed to make it easier for
users to transport heavy loads of refuse to the curb or other pick-up point. More recently it has
application for transporting stolen goods on bin day in residential suburbs. The term dumpster is
frequently used as a generic term for a large MGB or the non-mobile variety (known as a skip in
the UK or Australia) in the United States. In the US residential wheelie bins are also generically
called "Herbie Curbies. The smaller wheelie bins, for domestic or light commercial use, typically
hold 120 to 360 litres (26 to 79 imp gal; 32 to 95 US gal), with 240 litres (53 imp gal; 63 US gal)
being the most common. They have a hinged flap lid and two wheels on the bottom on the same
side as the lid hinge. There is a bar behind the hinge on the top of the bin which is used to move
it, or to hoist it up onto a garbage truck for emptying. The 240 litre bin is usually considered to
have the same capacity as three traditional waste containers. In the UK, "wheelie bins" for non-
recyclable domestic waste are currently collected either weekly or once a fortnight, depending on
the local Council's waste management policies.
Industrial bins: The larger bins, intended for commercial use, are mounted on four wheels
and usually have a folding lid and are covered by Part 2 of EN 840. They have capacities of 500
to 1,280 litres (110 to 280 imp gal; 130 to 340 US gal), with 1,100 litres (240 imp gal;
290 US gal) being the most common. Galvanized steel is often used for their construction in
place of high density polyethylene, where resistance to vandalism is important. In the
Bins in public areas: Certain public areas such as parks have litter bins which are placed
alongside paths frequently walked by visitors. This encourages people to avoid littering, as
littering creates an unhealthy and aesthetically unpleasant social environment.
Bins in outdoor locations or other busy public areas are usually mounted to the ground or floor.
This discourages theft, and also reduces vandalism by making it harder for the bins to be
physically moved, maneuvered, or tipped over.
In the past terrorists have left bombs in bins. The bomb is much less likely to be spotted than an
unattended bag and the metal bins provide extra shrapnel that injures people nearby when it
detonates. For this reason there are no bins in most railway stations, most airports and many
shopping centres in the United Kingdom, or if they are provided they are just a see through bin
bag hanging from a metal hoop. An alternative 'bomb-resistant' design, features a plastic inner
barrel surrounded by a thick steel outer barrel and a heavy hinged steel lid with a small hole for
waste, intended to direct any explosion upwards and contain shrapnel. Apartment buildings often
have dust flumes in which residents can dispose of their waste in stainless steel waste containers.
These chutes usually lead to some large receptacle or waste-disposal complex in the basement.
which is then emptied by a waste collection vehicle
The following table gives some dimensions and standard weights of dustbins.
CAPACITY OFDUSTBINS
To keep the dust bins to the above specifications, metal gauges must be regulated relatively to
the size of the dustbin being manufactured.
Where standards for the manufacture of the dustbins are established, necessary authority should
be obtained before one embarks on a special dustbin manufacture.
2. DUSTLESS LOADING DUSTBINS: The main features of a dustless loading dustbin are
that there should be no spillage or dissemination of dust or litter when the dustbin is:
1. Standing on stance,
2. While being collected,
3. While being emptied
4. While being returned to the stance.
To achieve all the above, dustless dustbin should be provided with hoppers or shutters designed
to accommodate the dustbin.
Both the dustbin and the lid should have reasonable noise tolerance as the dustbin is emptied
mechanically.
The frequency of emptying process is so arranged that the hinged lid does not open until the top
of the dustbin has been sealed against the shutter to prevent the escape of dust.
Such dustbins are normally heavy and more expensive than the standard dustbins.
These are two sizes i.e. 0.070m3 and 0.090m3. The 0.090m3 is a more common dustbin in this
range.
The 0.07m3 weighs 16 kg while empty. The weight of loaded dustbin is therefore more than a
loader can lift. It is therefore necessary to provide trolleys on every vehicle to enable dustbins to
be wheeled to the vehicle for emptying.
The functional element of collection includes not only the gathering of solid waste and
recyclable materials, but also the transport of these materials, after collection, to the location
where the collection vehicle is emptied. This location may be materials processing facility, a
transfer station or a landfill disposal site. Waste handling and separation, storage and processing
at the source: Waste handling and separation involves activities associated with waste
management until the waste is placed in storage containers for collection. Handling also
encompasses the movement of loaded containers to the point of collection. Separating different
types of waste components is an important step in the handling and storage of solid waste at the
source. Separation and processing and transformation of solid wastes: The types of means and
facilities that are now used for the recovery of waste materials that have been separated at the
source include curbside collection, drop off and buy back centers. The separation and processing
of wastes that have been separated at the source and the separation of commingled wastes
usually occur at a materials recovery facility, transfer stations, combustion facilities and disposal
sites.
Waste collection: Waste collection is a part of the process of waste management. It is the
transfer of solid waste from the point of use and disposal to the point of treatment or landfill.
Waste collection also includes the curbside collection of recyclable materials that technically are
not waste, as part of a municipal landfill diversion program
Household waste in economically developed countries will generally be left in waste containers
or recycling bins prior to collection by a waste collector using a waste collection vehicle.
This element involves two main steps. First, the waste is transferred from a smaller collection vehicle to
larger transport equipment. The waste is then transported, usually over long distances, to a processing or
disposal site.
Land Fill: Disposal of waste in a landfill involves burying the waste, and this remains a
common practice in most countries. Landfills were often established in abandoned or unused
quarries, mining voids or borrow pits. A properly designed and well-managed landfill can be a
hygienic and relatively inexpensive method of disposing of waste materials. Older, poorly
designed or poorly managed landfills can create a number of adverse environmental impacts
such as wind-blown litter, attraction of vermin, and generation of liquid leachate. Another
common product of landfills is gas (mostly composed of methane and carbon dioxide), which is
produced as organic waste breaks down anaerobically. This gas can create odor problems, kill
surface vegetation, and is a greenhouse gas.
Design characteristics of a modern landfill include methods to contain leachate such as clay or
plastic lining material. Deposited waste is normally compacted to increase its density and
stability, and covered to prevent attracting vermin (such as mice or rats). Many landfills also
have landfill gas extraction systems installed to extract the landfill gas. Gas is pumped out of the
landfill using perforated pipes and flared off or burnt in a gas engine to generate electricity.
Energy generation: Municipal solid waste can be used to generate energy. Several technologies
have been developed that make the processing of MSW for energy generation cleaner and more
economical than ever before, including landfill gas capture, combustion, pyrolysis, gasification,
and plasma arc gasification. While older waste incineration plants emitted high levels of
pollutants, recent regulatory changes and new technologies have significantly reduced this
concern. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations in 1995 and 2000
under the Clean Air Act have succeeded in reducing emissions of dioxins from waste-to-energy
facilities by more than 99 percent below 1990 levels, while mercury emissions have been by over
90 percent. The EPA noted these improvements in 2003, citing waste-to-energy as a power
source “with less environmental impact than almost any other source of electricity
Incineration is carried out both on a small scale by individuals and on a large scale by industry. It
is used to dispose of solid, liquid and gaseous waste. It is recognized as a practical method of
disposing of certain hazardous waste materials (such as biological medical waste). Incineration is
a controversial method of waste disposal, due to issues such as emission of gaseous pollutants.
Incineration is common in countries such as Japan where land is scarcer, as these facilities
generally do not require as much area as landfills. Waste-to-energy (WtE) or energy-from-waste
(EfW) are broad terms for facilities that burn waste in a furnace or boiler to generate heat, steam
or electricity. Combustion in an incinerator is not always perfect and there have been concerns
about pollutants in gaseous emissions from incinerator stacks. Particular concern has focused on
some very persistent organics such as dioxins, furans, PAHs which may be created which may
have serious environmental consequences.
Recycling is a resource recovery practice that refers to the collection and reuse of waste
materials such as empty beverage containers. The materials from which the items are made can
be reprocessed into new products. Material for recycling may be collected separately from
general waste using dedicated bins and collection vehicles are sorted directly from mixed waste
streams and are known as kerb-side recycling, it requires the owner of the waste to separate it
into various different bins (typically wheelie bins) prior to its collection.
UNIT 12
STREET CLEANSING
A street sweeper or street cleaner may refer to either a person's occupation, or a machine that
cleans streets. A street sweeper cleans the streets, usually in an urban area.
Street sweepers have been employed in cities since sanitation and waste removal became a
priority. A street-sweeping person would use a broom and shovel to clean off litter, animal waste
and filth that accumulated on streets. Later, water hoses were used to wash the streets.
Machines were created in the 19th century to do the job more efficiently. Today, modern street
sweepers are mounted on truck bodies and can vacuum debris that accumulates in streets.
Modern sweepers: Newer street sweepers are capable of collecting small particles of debris.
Many street sweepers produced today are PM10 certified, meaning that they are capable of
collecting and holding particulate matter sized less than 10μm. Despite advancements in street
sweeping technology, the mechanical broom type street sweeper accounts for approximately 90
percent of all street sweepers used in the United States today.
Modern street sweepers are equipped with water tanks and sprayers used to loosen particles and
reduce dust. The brooms gather debris into a main collection area from which it is vacuumed and
pumped into a collection bin or hopper.
A regenerative air street sweeper uses forced air to create a swirling effect inside a contained
sweeping head and then uses the negative pressure on the suction side to place the road debris
inside a hopper. Debris is removed from the air by centrifugal separation and reused, keeping
particulate matter inside the hopper. Many regenerative air sweepers are AQMD certified by the
NOTES FOR P.H.O STUDENTS BY O.E.AKOTH
58
company who manufactures them and can pick up particles as small as 10 micrometres or less
(PM-10), a leading cause of storm water pollution.
However a modern regenerative air street sweeper faces the challenge of noise level due to the
fact that regenerative air street sweeper requires an extra engine to power the vacuum pump
required to create the negative pressure for placing debris into a hoppe
Street sweeper
Hazardous waste is waste that poses substantial or potential threats to public health or the
environment.In the United States, the treatment, storage and disposal of hazardous waste is
regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Hazardous wastes are
defined under RCRA in 40 CFR 261 where they are divided into two major categories:
1. Characteristic hazardous wastes are materials that are known or tested to exhibit one or more
of the following four hazardous traits:
2. Listed hazardous wastes are materials specifically listed by regulatory authorities as a hazardous
waste which are from non-specific sources, specific sources, or discarded chemical products.[3]
The requirements of RCRA apply to all the companies that generate hazardous waste as well as
those companies that store or dispose of hazardous waste in the United States. Many types of
businesses generate hazardous waste. For example, dry cleaners, automobile repair shops,
hospitals, exterminators, and photo processing centers may all generate hazardous waste. Some
hazardous waste generators are larger companies such as chemical manufacturers, electroplating
companies, and oil refineries.
These wastes may be found in different physical states such as gaseous, liquids, or solids. A
hazardous waste is a special type of waste because it cannot be disposed of by common means
like other by-products of our everyday lives. Depending on the physical state of the waste,
treatment and solidification processes might be required.
Worldwide, The United Nations Environmental Programme(UNEP) estimated that more than
400 million tons of hazardous wastes are produced universally each year, mostly by
industrialized countries (schmit, 1999). About 1- percent of this total is shipped across
international boundaries, with the majority of the transfers occurring between countries in the
Organization for the Economic Cooperation and Development(OECD) (Krueger, 1999).[4] Some
of the reasons for industrialized countries to ship the hazardous waste to industrializing countries
for disposal are the rising cost of disposing hazardous waste in the home country.
Final disposal of hazardous waste: Historically, some hazardous wastes were disposed of
in regular landfills. This resulted in unfavorable amounts of hazardous materials seeping into the
ground. These chemicals eventually entered natural hydrologic systems. Many landfills now
require countermeasures against groundwater contamination, an example being installing a
barrier along the foundation of the landfill to contain the hazardous substances that may remain
in the disposed waste.[5] Currently, hazardous wastes must often be stabilized and solidified in
order to enter a landfill and many hazardous wastes undergo different treatments in order to
stabilize and dispose of them. Most flammable materials can be recycled, used as industrial fuel.
Some materials with hazardous constituents can be recycled, lead acid batteries are one example.
Portland cement: Another commonly used treatment is cement based solidification and
stabilization. Cement is used because it can treat a range of hazardous wastes by improving
physical characteristics and decreasing the toxicity and transmission of contaminants. The
cement produced is categorized into 5 different divisions, depending on its strength and
components. This process of converting sludge into cement might include the addition of pH
adjustment agents, phosphates, or sulfur reagents to reduce the settling or curing time, increase
the compressive strength, or reduce the leach ability of contaminants.
Types of Hazardous Waste: The EPA defines and regulates several types of hazardous
waste. These include materials that have come into contact with certain chemical agents, certain
pesticides and pharmaceutical products, and the byproducts of common industrial products, such
as cleaning solvents, wastewater and sludge.
Workplace Regulations: All employees who may come into contact with hazardous
materials must be fully trained in proper handling of these materials and equipped with all
necessary protective gear such as gloves, goggles and coveralls. Occupational Safety and Health
Administration regulations require these protections. Failure to comply may result in serious
health issues for individuals as well as fines and possible civil suits against noncompliant
businesses. The EPA estimates that hundreds of hazardous waste sites remain from the days
before industries realized the dangers of unregulated disposal.
Companies need to be responsible with their industrial waste management and specifically their
hazardous waste. Many local governments provide counseling, consulting and recommendations
to organizations on what they can do to better manage their waste and plan for a more
environmentally friendly production processes. More than ever, there need to be consequences to
companies that do not take waste management seriously. Part of this includes reducing harmful
emissions into the environment over a period of time and correctly disposing of waste materials.
Companies who have no choice but to continue creating hazardous industrial waste due to the
1. solids,
2. liquids, or
3. gases that can harm:
i. people,
ii. other living organisms,
iii. property, or
iv. the environment.
They are often subject to chemical regulations. In the United States and sometimes in Canada
dangerous goods are more commonly known as hazardous materials, (abbreviated as
HAZMAT or HazMat).. Dangerous goods include materials that are:
1. radioactive,
2. flammable,
3. explosive,
4. corrosive,
5. oxidizing,
6. asphyxiating,
7. biohazardous,
8. toxic, pathogenic, or
9. allergenic.
Also included are physical conditions such as compressed gases and liquids or hot materials,
including all goods containing such materials or chemicals, or may have other characteristics that
render them hazardous in specific circumstances.
In the United States, dangerous goods are often indicated by diamond-shaped signage on the
item, its container, and/or the building where it is stored. The colours of each diamond in a way
has reference to its hazard i.e.:
1. Flammable = red because fire and heat are generally of red colour,
NOTES FOR P.H.O STUDENTS BY O.E.AKOTH
66
2. Explosive = orange, because mixing red (flammable) with yellow (oxidising agent)
creates orange.
3. Non-flammable Non-toxic Gas = green, due to all compressed air vessels being this
colour in France after World War II. France is where the diamond system of HazMat
identification originated.
UNIT 14
people involved in health care waste management at any level should be aware of;
1. definitions,
2. characterization and
3. classification of health care waste,
4. associated risks and
5. basic protective measures for employees,
6. minimum observance that any health care facilities should comply with,
7. key management principles,
8. sound treatment and
9. Disposal technologies applicable to each category of waste.
There are actions that should be taken as a first step to assess the current situation before
developing a national health care waste management plan. The relevance of such a plan and the
implementation of realistic, practical and sustainable solutions, tuned to the needs of countries,
depends on the accuracy of the initial assessment.
The plan should be developed according to specific objectives to be used by the planning
officers of the central, regional and county Governments to improve all aspects of health care
waste management. Complementary to the development of health care waste management
through sets of specific objectives, a holistic approach is necessary to address efficiently all the
specific aspects of such a plan.
Finally develop a strategy to implement a health care waste management plan at national and
regional levels. It is important and necessary, during the implementation phases, to reinforce the
collaboration between the central, the regional and municipal authorities to improve the health
care waste management practices and to find out pragmatic solutions for their sound disposal.
UNIT 15
All electronic scrap components, such as CRTs, may contain contaminants such as lead,
cadmium, beryllium, or brominated flame retardants. Even in developed countries recycling and
disposal of e-waste may involve significant risk to workers and communities and great care must
be taken to avoid unsafe exposure in recycling operations and leaking of materials such as heavy
metals from landfills and incinerator ashes. Scrap industry and USA EPA officials agree that
materials should be managed with caution
CRTs have relatively high concentration of lead and phosphors (not to be confused with
phosphorus), both of which are necessary for the display. The United States Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) includes discarded CRT monitors in its category of "hazardous
household waste" but considers CRTs that have been set aside for testing to be commodities if
they are not discarded, speculatively accumulated, or left unprotected from weather and other
damage.
The EU and its member states operate a system via the European Waste Catalogue (EWC)- a
European Council Directive, which is interepreted into "Member state law". In the UK (EU
member state), this is in the form of the List of Wastes Directive. However, the list (and EWC)
gives broad definition (EWC Code 16 02 13*) of Hazardous Electronic wastes, requiring "waste
operators" to employ the Hazardous Waste Regulations (Annex 1A, Annex 1B) for refined
definition. Constituent materials in the waste also require assessment via the combination of
Annex II and Annex III, again allowing operators to further determine whether a waste is
hazardous.
Debate continues over the distinction between "commodity" and "waste" electronics definitions.
Some exporters are accused of deliberately leaving difficult-to-recycle, obsolete, or non-
NOTES FOR P.H.O STUDENTS BY O.E.AKOTH
70
repairable equipment mixed in loads of working equipment (though this may also come through
ignorance, or to avoid more costly treatment processes). Protectionists may broaden the
definition of "waste" electronics in order to protect domestic markets from working secondary
equipment.
The high value of the computer recycling subset of electronic waste (working and reusable
laptops, desktops, and components like RAM) can help pay the cost of transportation for a larger
number of worthless pieces than can be achieved with display devices, which have less (or
negative) scrap value. In A 2011 report, "Ghana E-Waste Country Assessment",[5] found that of
215,000 tons of electronics imported to Ghana, 30% were brand new and 70% were used. Of the
used product, the study concluded that 15% was not reused and was scrapped or discarded. This
contrasts with published but uncredited claims that 80% of the imports into Ghana were being
burned in primitive conditions.
Rapid changes in technology, changes in media (tapes, software, MP3), falling prices, and
planned obsolescence have resulted in a fast-growing surplus of electronic waste around the
globe. Dave Kruch, CEO of Cash For Laptops, regards electronic waste as a "rapidly expanding"
issue.[6] Technical solutions are available, but in most cases a legal framework, a collection,
logistics, and other services need to be implemented before a technical solution can be applied.
Display units (CRT, LCD, LED monitors), Processors (CPU, GPU, or APU chips), memory
(DRAM or SRAM), and audio components have different useful lives. Processors are most
NOTES FOR P.H.O STUDENTS BY O.E.AKOTH
71
frequently out-dated (by software no longer being optimized) and are more likely to become "e-
waste", while display units are most often replaced while working without repair attempts, due to
changes in wealthy nation appetites for new display technology.
An estimated 50 million tons of E-waste are produced each year. The USA discards 30 million
computers each year and 100 million phones are disposed of in Europe each year. The
Environmental Protection Agency estimates that only 15-20% of e-waste is recycled, the rest of
these electronics go directly into landfills and incinerators
According to a report by UNEP titled, "Recycling - from E-Waste to Resources," the amount of
e-waste being produced - including mobile phones and computers - could rise by as much as 500
percent over the next decade in some countries, such as India.[8] The United States is the world
leader in producing electronic waste, tossing away about 3 million tons each year. China already
produces about 2.3 million tons (2010 estimate) domestically, second only to the United States.
And, despite having banned e-waste imports, China remains a major e-waste dumping ground for
developed countries.
Electrical waste contains hazardous but also valuable and scarce materials. Up to 60 elements
can be found in complex electronics.
In the United States, an estimated 70% of heavy metals in landfills comes from discarded
electronics.
While there is agreement that the number of discarded electronic devices is increasing, there is
considerable disagreement about the relative risk (compared to automobile scrap, for example),
and strong disagreement whether curtailing trade in used electronics will improve conditions, or
make them worse. According to an article in Motherboard, attempts to restrict the trade have
driven reputable companies out of the supply chain, with unintended consequences.<mithun>
One theory is that increased regulation of electronic waste and concern over the environmental
harm in mature economies creates an economic disincentive to remove residues prior to export.
Critics of trade in used electronics maintain that it is still too easy for brokers calling themselves
recyclers to export unscreened electronic waste to developing countries, such as China,[13] India
and parts of Africa, thus avoiding the expense of removing items like bad cathode ray tubes (the
processing of which is expensive and difficult). The developing countries have become toxic
dump yards of e-waste. Proponents of international trade point to the success of fair trade
programs in other industries, where cooperation has led to creation of sustainable jobs, and can
bring affordable technology in countries where repair and reuse rates are higher.
Defenders of the trade in used electronics say that extraction of metals from virgin mining has
been shifted to developing countries. Recycling of copper, silver, gold, and other materials from
discarded electronic devices is considered better for the environment than mining. They also
state that repair and reuse of computers and televisions has become a "lost art" in wealthier
nations, and that refurbishing has traditionally been a path to development.
South Korea, Taiwan, and southern China all excelled in finding "retained value" in used goods,
and in some cases have set up billion-dollar industries in refurbishing used ink cartridges, single-
use cameras, and working CRTs. Refurbishing has traditionally been a threat to established
manufacturing, and simple protectionism explains some criticism of the trade. Works like "The
Waste Makers" by Vance Packard explain some of the criticism of exports of working product,
for example the ban on import of tested working Pentium 4 laptops to China, or the bans on
NOTES FOR P.H.O STUDENTS BY O.E.AKOTH
74
export of used surplus working electronics by Japan.
Opponents of surplus electronics exports argue that lower environmental and labor standards,
cheap labor, and the relatively high value of recovered raw materials leads to a transfer of
pollution-generating activities, such as smelting of copper wire. In China, Malaysia, India,
Kenya, and various African countries, electronic waste is being sent to these countries for
processing, sometimes illegally. Many surplus laptops are routed to developing nations as
"dumping grounds for e-waste".
Because the United States has not ratified the Basel Convention or its Ban Amendment, and has
few domestic federal laws forbidding the export of toxic waste, the Basel Action Network
estimates that about 80% of the electronic waste directed to recycling in the U.S. does not get
recycled there at all, but is put on container ships and sent to countries such as China.[14][15][16][17]
This figure is disputed as an exaggeration by the EPA, the Institute of Scrap Recycling
Industries, and the World Reuse, Repair and Recycling Association.
Several sizes of button and coin cell with 2 9v batteries as a size comparison. They are all recycled in
many countries since they contain lead, mercury and cadmium.
Some computer components can be reused in assembling new computer products, while others
are reduced to metals that can be reused in applications as varied as construction, flatware, and
jewelry.
Substances found in large quantities include epoxy resins, fiberglass, PCBs, PVC (polyvinyl
chlorides), thermosetting plastics, lead, tin, copper, silicon, beryllium, carbon, iron and
aluminium.
Elements found in trace amounts include americium, antimony, arsenic, barium, bismuth, boron,
cobalt, europium, gallium, germanium, gold, indium, lithium, manganese, nickel, niobium,
palladium, platinum, rhodium, ruthenium, selenium, silver, tantalum, terbium, thorium, titanium,
vanadium, and yttrium.
Almost all electronics contain lead and tin (as solder) and copper (as wire and printed circuit
board tracks), though the use of lead-free solder is now spreading rapidly. The following are
ordinary applications:
Hazardous
NOTES FOR P.H.O STUDENTS BY O.E.AKOTH
76
Recyclers in the street in São Paulo, Brazil with old computers
4. BFRs: Used as flame retardants in plastics in most electronics. Includes PBBs, PBDE,
DecaBDE, OctaBDE, PentaBDE. Health effects include impaired development of the
nervous system, thyroid problems, liver problems. Environmental effects: similar effects
as in animals as humans. PBBs were banned from 1973 to 1977 on. PCBs were banned
during the 1980s.
6. Lead: Solder, CRT monitor glass, lead-acid batteries, some formulations of PVC.A
typical 15-inch cathode ray tube may contain 1.5 pounds of lead, but other CRTs have
been estimated as having up to 8 pounds of lead. Adverse effects of lead exposure include
impaired cognitive function, behavioral disturbances, attention deficits, hyperactivity,
conduct problems and lower IQ
7. Beryllium oxide: Filler in some thermal interface materials such as thermal grease used
on heat sinks for CPUs and power transistors magnetrons, X-ray-transparent ceramic
windows, heat transfer fins in vacuum tubes, and gas lasers.
There is also evidence of cytotixic and genotoxic effects of some chemicals, which have been
shown to inhibit cell proliferation, cause cell membrane lesion, cause DNA single-strand breaks,
and elevate Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) levels.
1. DNA breaks can increase the likelihood of developing cancer (if the damage is to a tumor
suppressor gene)
2. DNA damages are a special problem in non-dividing or slowly dividing cells, where
NOTES FOR P.H.O STUDENTS BY O.E.AKOTH
78
unrepaired damages will tend to accumulate over time. On the other hand, in rapidly
dividing cells, unrepaired DNA damages that do not kill the cell by blocking replication
will tend to cause replication errors and thus mutation
3. Elevated Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) levels can cause damage to cell structures
(oxidative stress)[71]
Generally non-hazardous
Aluminium: nearly all electronic goods using more than a few watts of power (heatsinks),
electrolytic capacitors.
UNIT 16
ENFORCMENT OF LEGISLATION