The chapter discusses the legal liability of CPAs. It notes that CPAs now practice in a more litigious environment due to factors such as increased complexity, economic downturns, and contingent-fee attorneys. The failure of financial statement users to differentiate between business failure, audit failure, and audit risk has led to more lawsuits against auditors. The chapter outlines key legal concepts in determining CPA liability, including liability to clients and third parties. It also discusses common defenses auditors use against client claims, such as lack of duty, non-negligent performance, contributory negligence, and absence of causal connection.
The chapter discusses the legal liability of CPAs. It notes that CPAs now practice in a more litigious environment due to factors such as increased complexity, economic downturns, and contingent-fee attorneys. The failure of financial statement users to differentiate between business failure, audit failure, and audit risk has led to more lawsuits against auditors. The chapter outlines key legal concepts in determining CPA liability, including liability to clients and third parties. It also discusses common defenses auditors use against client claims, such as lack of duty, non-negligent performance, contributory negligence, and absence of causal connection.
The chapter discusses the legal liability of CPAs. It notes that CPAs now practice in a more litigious environment due to factors such as increased complexity, economic downturns, and contingent-fee attorneys. The failure of financial statement users to differentiate between business failure, audit failure, and audit risk has led to more lawsuits against auditors. The chapter outlines key legal concepts in determining CPA liability, including liability to clients and third parties. It also discusses common defenses auditors use against client claims, such as lack of duty, non-negligent performance, contributory negligence, and absence of causal connection.
The chapter discusses the legal liability of CPAs. It notes that CPAs now practice in a more litigious environment due to factors such as increased complexity, economic downturns, and contingent-fee attorneys. The failure of financial statement users to differentiate between business failure, audit failure, and audit risk has led to more lawsuits against auditors. The chapter outlines key legal concepts in determining CPA liability, including liability to clients and third parties. It also discusses common defenses auditors use against client claims, such as lack of duty, non-negligent performance, contributory negligence, and absence of causal connection.
CHAPTER 5 LEARNING OBJECTIVES 5-1 Understand the litigious environment in which CPAs practice. 5-2 Explain why the failure of financial statement users to differentiate among business failure, audit failure, and audit risk has resulted in lawsuits. 5-3 Use the primary legal concepts and terms concerning accountants’ liability as a basis for studying legal liability of auditors. 5-4 Describe accountants’ liability to clients and related defenses. 5-5 Describe accountants’ liability to third parties under common law and related defenses.
• Professionals, including CPAs, are held to a high level of
performance. • Under common law, auditors must fulfill contracts with clients and may also be held liable to third parties. • Auditors may also be held liable to third parties based on statute, including the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the Sarbanes- Oxley Act.
CHANGED LEGAL ENVIRONMENT (CONT.) Increase in the number of lawsuits and the sizes of the awards to plaintiffs Reasons for this trend include: • Growing awareness of the responsibilities of CPAs • Increased effort by the SEC to protect investors’ interests • Increased complexity of auditing and accounting • Litigious society
CHANGED LEGAL ENVIRONMENT (CONT.) Reasons for increased litigation against CPAs (cont): • Recession and tough economic times resulting in business failures • Attorneys often provide legal services on a contingent-fee basis • CPA firms willing to settle legal cases out of court • Difficulties of judges and juries understanding technical accounting and auditing matters
OBJECTIVE 5-2 Explain why the failure of financial statement users to differentiate among business failure, audit failure, and audit risk has resulted in lawsuits.
DISTINGUISHING BUSINESS FAILURE, AUDIT FAILURE, AND AUDIT RISK • Audit failure occurs when the auditor issues an incorrect audit opinion because the auditor did not comply with auditing standards • Audit risk represents the possibility that the auditor concludes, after conducting an adequate audit, that the financial statements were fairly stated when, in fact, they were materially misstated In cases when an audit failed to uncover material misstatements and the wrong type of opinion was issued, it is appropriate to question whether the auditor exercised due care in performing the audit. If the auditor did not exercise due care, the auditor can be held liable for the incorrect opinion.
DISTINGUISHING BUSINESS FAILURE, AUDIT FAILURE, AND AUDIT RISK The “expectation gap” contributes to the amount of litigation against auditors. The “expectation gap” refers to the difference between what an auditor’s responsibilities are and what the user expects from the auditor. • Auditor’s responsibility: to perform the audit in accordance with auditing standards • User expectation: is often that the auditor guarantees the accuracy of the financial statements, and even guarantees the viability of the business
LEGAL CONCEPTS AFFECTING LIABILITY Some basic legal concepts involved in determining liability: • Prudent person concept • Liability for the acts of others • Lack of privileged communication • Legal terms affecting CPAs liability • Sources of legal liability: 1. Liability to clients 2. Liability to third parties under common law 3. Civil liability under federal securities laws 4. Criminal liability Some examples of these classifications of liability are included in Figure 5-1.
The most common source of lawsuits against CPAs is from
clients regarding negligent acts. Auditors normally use one, or a combination of, the following four defenses with claims filed by clients: • Lack of duty to perform service • Nonnegligent performance • Contributory negligence • Absence of causal connection