Meningitis 2
Meningitis 2
Meningitis 2
Contributor Disclosures
All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete.
Literature review current through: Jan 2024. | This topic last updated: Aug 29, 2023.
INTRODUCTION
The treatment and prognosis of bacterial meningitis in infants and children older than
one month will be reviewed here. Other aspects of bacterial meningitis in pediatric
patients are discussed separately:
GENERAL MANAGEMENT
Setting of care — Children who are suspected of having bacterial meningitis based
upon the results of the initial evaluation (including history, physical examination,
laboratory tests, and cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] examination) should be admitted to the
hospital for ongoing management. The level of inpatient care (ward versus pediatric
intensive care unit) is determined by the severity of illness. Admission to a pediatric
intensive care unit is appropriate for children with hemodynamic instability (ie, septic
shock), significant respiratory compromise, prolonged or recurrent seizures, severely
depressed mental status, rapidly deteriorating clinical status, or other potentially life-
threatening complications.
● Shock – Children who are in shock should receive volume resuscitation with
isotonic fluid to maintain blood pressure and cerebral perfusion. The
management of septic shock in children is discussed separately. (See "Septic
shock in children in resource-abundant settings: Rapid recognition and initial
resuscitation (first hour)".)
● Hypovolemia without shock – Children who are volume depleted, but not in
shock, should receive volume repletion with isotonic fluids with careful and
frequent attention to fluid status. Daily weight, urine output, and serum
electrolytes should be monitored. (See "Treatment of hypovolemia (dehydration)
in children in resource-abundant settings".)
● SIADH – For children without signs of shock or hypovolemia who have evidence
of SIADH (eg, serum sodium <130 mEq/L), we suggest moderate fluid restriction
(ie, two-thirds to three-quarters of maintenance). Daily weight, urine output,
serum electrolytes, and, if indicated, serum and urine osmolalities should be
carefully monitored. Fluid administration can be liberalized gradually once serum
sodium is >135 mEq/L. Most children can receive maintenance fluid intake within
24 to 48 hours of hospitalization. SIADH is common in children with bacterial
meningitis. In one study, 10 percent of children with pneumococcal meningitis
had initial serum sodium values <130 mEq/L [2]. (See "Treatment of
hyponatremia: Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion
(SIADH) and reset osmostat", section on 'Fluid restriction'.)
Monitoring — Children who are being treated for bacterial meningitis should be
monitored carefully for complications (eg, seizures, signs of elevated intracranial
pressure, development of infected subdural effusions), particularly during the first
two to three days of treatment when complications are most likely to occur [3].
● Heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory rate should be monitored regularly
with a frequency appropriate to the care setting
● A complete neurologic examination should be performed daily; rapid assessment
of neurologic function should be performed several times per day for the first
several days of treatment
Infection control — All patients admitted to the hospital with meningitis should be
placed on standard precautions [4-6]. (See "Infection prevention: Precautions for
preventing transmission of infection", section on 'Standard precautions'.)
ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY
Because of the general limitation in antibiotic penetration into the CSF, all
patients should be treated with parenteral antibiotics. Oral antibiotics are not
appropriate for treatment of bacterial meningitis, since the dose and tissue levels
tend to be considerably lower than with parenteral agents.
We suggest twice-daily ceftriaxone dosing rather than once daily to avoid the
possibility of inadequate treatment in the event of dosing errors, delayed doses,
or missed doses [3].
• Unusual pathogen on Gram stain – The CSF Gram stain may provide important
clues for the need to broaden empiric therapy to cover for less common or
unusual organisms. However, empiric antibiotics should not be narrowed
based upon CSF Gram stain results, because Gram stain results are subject to
observer misinterpretation [11]; broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy should
be continued until CSF culture results are available.
• Negative culture with normal CSF profile – For children who have a normal
CSF profile and negative blood and CSF cultures, we usually discontinue
antimicrobial therapy if cultures remain sterile after 48 to 72 hours of
incubation.
• Negative culture with CSF pleocytosis – For children with CSF pleocytosis
whose blood and CSF cultures remain negative after 48 to 72 hours, the
decision to continue or discontinue empiric antibiotic therapy is individualized
based upon the clinical status of the child and level of clinical concern for
bacterial meningitis. Consultation with a pediatric infectious diseases specialist
is advised if the clinician is uncertain how to manage such children. Important
considerations include:
- Molecular tests can help to identify the specific pathogen in some cases
(see "Bacterial meningitis in children older than one month: Clinical
features and diagnosis", section on 'Molecular methods')
- Nonbacterial causes of CSF pleocytosis should also be considered (see
"Bacterial meningitis in children older than one month: Clinical features
and diagnosis", section on 'Differential diagnosis' and "Viral meningitis in
children: Clinical features and diagnosis", section on 'Distinguishing viral
from bacterial meningitis')
Specific therapy — Once the causative agent and its in vitro antimicrobial
susceptibility pattern are known, empiric antimicrobial therapy can be altered
accordingly. The following sections discuss the choice of antimicrobial regimen
according to the isolated pathogen. Guidance on treatment duration is provided
below. (See 'Treatment duration' below.)
Rifampin may be added to the regimen (if the isolate is susceptible) in the
following settings [6]:
● Other antimicrobials – Other antibiotics that are rarely used in the treatment of
resistant pneumococcal meningitis include meropenem and respiratory
fluoroquinolones (eg, moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, gemifloxacin) [13].
Meropenem is effective in vitro but should not be used for monotherapy [13].
Fluoroquinolones are not routinely recommended for use in children due to the
potential risk of musculoskeletal toxicity. However, for serious infections such as
meningitis, it is reasonable to use a systemic fluoroquinolone when no safe or
effective alternative exists. (See "Fluoroquinolones", section on 'Children'.)
Chloramphenicol also has been used for patients with an allergy to penicillin and
cephalosporin. Unfortunately, many penicillin-resistant strains are somewhat
resistant to chloramphenicol killing (despite in vitro tests that show inhibition)
and treatment failures of meningitis caused by penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae
have occurred when chloramphenicol was used [14].
Alternative agents for MRSA meningitis include ceftaroline (45 mg/kg/day in three
divided doses), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX; 10 to 12 mg/kg of the
TMP component and 50 to 60 mg/kg of the SMX component per day in four
divided doses) or linezolid (in patients <12 years old: 30 mg/kg/day IV in three
divided doses [maximum dose 1200 mg/day]; in patients ≥12 years old: 600 mg IV
twice per day) [11,18,19]:
● Enteric GNR – The usual treatment regimen for susceptible isolates consists of an
extended-spectrum cephalosporin (eg, ceftriaxone 100 mg/kg/day IV in two
divided doses [maximum dose 4 g/day] or cefotaxime [where available] 200 to
300 mg/kg/day IV in four divided doses [maximum dose 12 g/day]) plus an
aminoglycoside (eg, gentamicin 7.5 mg/kg/day IV in three divided doses) [25]. The
aminoglycoside often can be discontinued after the first five to seven days, once
the CSF is documented to be sterile.
Repeat LP should be performed two to three days after starting therapy to assess the
efficacy of treatment. (See 'Repeat lumbar puncture' below.)
● S. pneumoniae – 10 to 14 days
● N. meningitidis – 5 to 7 days
● H. influenzae – 7 to 10 days
● L. monocytogenes – 21 to 28 days
● S. aureus – At least two weeks
● Gram-negative bacilli – Three weeks or a minimum of two weeks beyond the first
sterile CSF culture, whichever is longer
Limited observational and clinical trial data suggest that in carefully selected cases, a
shorter duration of therapy may be equally efficacious and may reduce hospital
duration and health care costs [29-31]. However, due to the limitations of these data,
as described below, we view the findings as preliminary and continue to suggest
organism-specific durations of therapy, as outlined above.
A 2009 meta-analysis of five randomized trials (383 children) found that treatment for
4 to 7 days resulted in rates of cure similar to treatment for 7 to 14 days (odds ratio
1.24, 95% CI 0.73-2.11) [30]. However, the trials included in the meta-analysis had
important limitations, including lack of blinding in all five trials, small number of
patients, and relatively short follow-up. In addition, there was considerable variability
in the distribution of causative organisms in the different trials, with the most
common being S. pneumoniae, N. meningitidis, and H. influenzae type b (Hib). In a
subsequent multicenter trial in resource-limited countries involving >1000 children
with bacterial meningitis (S. pneumoniae in 33 percent, Hib in 26 percent, N.
meningitidis in 7 percent, and no identified cause in 33 percent), outcomes were
generally similar among children treated with ceftriaxone for 5 versus 10 days [29].
There were two cases of relapse in the 5-day group versus none in the 10-day group,
and there were nine meningitis-related deaths (2 percent) in the 5-day group versus
six (1 percent) in the 10-day group. While these differences were not statistically
significant, the study may have been underpowered to detect important differences.
Furthermore, the setting, methodology, and lack of organism-specific outcome
information preclude generalizability to resource-abundant settings [29,32].
● Patient has completed at least six days of inpatient therapy – Serious adverse
complications of meningitis are uncommon after three or four days of therapy,
particularly in children who are clinically well and afebrile [35].
● Patient has normal or nearly normal neurologic function (no focal findings and no
seizure activity).
If the outpatient regimen will be different from the regimen given in the hospital, we
suggest that the first dose be supervised in the hospital to ensure that the patient
tolerates it. Home antibiotic therapy should be administered by a qualified home
health nursing professional or a caregiver who has received proper instruction. If the
family is not comfortable administering the antibiotics, arrangements can be made to
administer antibiotics in the office. In addition, the patient should be examined daily
by a clinician (eg, visiting nurse, primary care provider). If any concerns arise
(recurrence of fever, new neurologic findings), the patient should be referred for
further evaluation.
RESPONSE TO THERAPY
The response to therapy is monitored with clinical and laboratory parameters (eg,
fever curve, resolution of symptoms and signs, normalization of inflammatory
markers) and by neuroimaging.
Duration of fever — Fevers typically last three to six days after initiating adequate
therapy [3]. Fever lasts >5 days in approximately 10 to 15 percent of patients [3,38];
secondary fever (eg, recurrence of fever after being afebrile for at least 24 hours)
occurs in approximately 15 to 20 percent [3,38].
● Inadequate treatment
● Development of nosocomial infection (eg, infected intravenous [IV] catheters,
urinary tract infection, viral infection); nosocomial infection is more often
associated with secondary fever than with persistent fever
● Discontinuation of dexamethasone (see "Bacterial meningitis in children:
Dexamethasone and other measures to prevent neurologic complications",
section on 'Adverse effects')
● Development of a suppurative complication (pericarditis, pneumonia, arthritis,
subdural empyema ( image 1 and picture 1))
● Drug fever (a diagnosis of exclusion)
Repeat blood culture — As discussed above, repeat blood culture may be warranted
in patients with persistent or secondary fever. In addition, for patients who had a
positive blood culture at initial evaluation, blood culture should be repeated to
document sterility of the blood stream. The follow-up blood culture is usually
obtained when it is known that the initial blood culture is positive.
• Children with high bacterial burden in CSF (eg, sheets of bacteria on Gram
stain)
PROGNOSIS
Mortality — Reported mortality rates among children with bacterial meningitis range
from 0 to 15 percent, depending upon the setting, era, and infecting organism [41-
47]. In resource-abundant settings, mortality rates associated with bacterial
meningitis are approximately 4 to 5 percent [44,45]. Reported mortality rates in
resource-limited countries are approximately 8 to 10 percent [44].
Case-fatality rates according to the organism isolated are as follows
[2,41,42,44,48,49]:
The risk of mortality is increased in children who are comatose or in shock at the time
of admission and in those who require mechanical ventilation [42,50,51].
The risk of hearing impairment is also related to etiologic agent. Hearing loss
occurs in approximately 31 percent of children with pneumococcal meningitis, 11
percent of children with meningococcal meningitis, and 6 percent of children with
Hib meningitis [42,56,59].
● Seizures – In a multicenter pneumococcal meningitis surveillance study, the
occurrence of seizures more than 72 hours after initiation of appropriate
antimicrobial therapy was associated with increased risk of neurologic sequelae
[42]. In a series of children with Hib meningitis, seizures were associated with
subtle cognitive and learning problems [60].
FOLLOW-UP
Developmental screening — Young children who have been treated for meningitis
are at risk for developmental delay. Developmental surveillance should continue
throughout childhood. (See "Developmental-behavioral surveillance and screening in
primary care".)
Evaluation for immunodeficiency — Children who develop pneumococcal
meningitis with a vaccine serotype ( table 7) despite having received at least one
dose of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and those who develop Haemophilus
influenzae type b (Hib) meningitis despite two or more doses of the Hib vaccine may
have an underlying immunodeficiency. In such cases, an evaluation of the child’s
immune status with serum immunoglobulin levels and human immunodeficiency
virus (HIV) testing can be considered [6,64]. Infections caused by pneumococcal
serotype 3 are an exception to this since pneumococcal conjugate vaccines are less
protective against this serotype.
In one study of 163 children who underwent immune evaluation after being
diagnosed with invasive pneumococcal disease (87 percent had meningitis), 10
percent were found to have an underlying primary immunodeficiency [64]. However,
in another study that included 28 children who underwent immune evaluation
because they developed invasive pneumococcal disease despite receiving ≥2 doses of
pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, only one child was found to have an
immunodeficiency [65].
PREVENTION
● Basilar skull fractures – Basilar skull fractures with underlying dural tears are
associated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks and predispose patients to
meningitis because of the potential for direct communication of bacteria in the
upper respiratory tract with the central nervous system. The available evidence
does not support the routine use of antibiotics prophylactically to prevent
meningitis in this setting [66]. Furthermore, the majority of CSF leaks resolve
spontaneously within one week of injury. However, the incidence of bacterial
meningitis rises substantially if a leak persists past seven days and prophylactic
antibiotics may be appropriate in some cases, particularly if the leak cannot be
repaired in a timely manner. (See "Skull fractures in children: Clinical
manifestations, diagnosis, and management", section on 'Basilar skull fractures'.)
Vaccines — Vaccines directed against each of the major pathogens causing bacterial
meningitis in children are discussed separately:
Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage
you to print or email these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient
education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the
keyword[s] of interest.)
● Basics topics (see "Patient education: Meningitis in children (The Basics)" and
"Patient education: Bacterial meningitis (The Basics)")
● Beyond the Basics topic (see "Patient education: Meningitis in children (Beyond
the Basics)")
● Empiric antibiotic therapy – For most patients older than one month with
suspected meningitis, we suggest vancomycin plus high doses of a third-
generation cephalosporin (eg, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime) rather than other
regimens (Grade 2C). This combination provides coverage for antibiotic-resistant
Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis, and Haemophilus influenzae
(type b [Hib] and non-type b), which are the most common causes of bacterial
meningitis in children. Additional coverage may be warranted in select
circumstances, as summarized in the table ( table 2). Empiric antibiotic therapy
should be initiated immediately after lumbar puncture (LP) is performed if the
clinical suspicion for meningitis is high ( table 1). (See 'Empiric therapy' above
and 'Avoidance of delay' above.)
● Specific therapy – Once the causative agent and its in vitro antimicrobial
susceptibility pattern are known, empiric antimicrobial therapy can be altered
accordingly. The duration of antimicrobial therapy depends upon the causative
organism and the clinical course. (See 'Specific therapy' above and 'Treatment
duration' above.)
● Prognosis – The mortality rate for children with bacterial meningitis in resource-
abundant settings is approximately 4 to 5 percent. Neurologic complications are
common among survivors. The most common sequelae include hearing loss,
seizures, intellectual disability, and spasticity and/or paresis. (See 'Prognosis'
above and "Bacterial meningitis in children: Neurologic complications".)
● Follow-up – Children who have been treated for bacterial meningitis should
undergo hearing evaluation at the time of or shortly after discharge. They should
also be followed closely for other neurologic sequelae including gross motor and
cognitive impairment. (See 'Follow-up' above.)
1. Maconochie IK, Bhaumik S. Fluid therapy for acute bacterial meningitis. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev 2014; :CD004786.
2. Olarte L, Barson WJ, Barson RM, et al. Impact of the 13-Valent Pneumococcal
Conjugate Vaccine on Pneumococcal Meningitis in US Children. Clin Infect Dis
2015; 61:767.
3. Kim KS. Bacterial meningitis beyond the neonatal period. In: Feigin and Cherry’s T
extbook of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, 8th, Cherry JD, Harrison GJ, Kaplan SL, et
al (Eds), Elsevier, Philadelphia 2019. p.309.
4. American Academy of Pediatrics. Haemophilus influenzae infections. In: Red Book:
2021-2024 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, 32nd ed, Kimberlin D
W, Barnett ED, Lynfield R, Sawyer MH (Eds), American Academy of Pediatrics, Itasc
a, IL 2021. p.345.
5. American Academy of Pediatrics. Meningococcal infections. In: Red Book: 2021-20
24 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, 32nd ed, Kimberlin DW, Barne
tt ED, Lynfield R, Sawyer MH (Eds), American Academy of Pediatrics, Itasca, IL 202
1. p.519.
6. American Academy of Pediatrics. Pneumococcal infections. In: Red Book: 2021-202
4 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, 32nd ed, Kimberlin DW, Barnett
ED, Lynfield R, Sawyer MH (Eds), American Academy of Pediatrics, Itasca, IL 2021.
p.639.
7. Finberg RW, Moellering RC, Tally FP, et al. The importance of bactericidal drugs:
future directions in infectious disease. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39:1314.
8. Friedland IR, Paris M, Ehrett S, et al. Evaluation of antimicrobial regimens for
treatment of experimental penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant pneumococcal
meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993; 37:1630.
9. Cherubin CE, Marr JS, Sierra MF, Becker S. Listeria and gram-negative bacillary
meningitis in New York City, 1972-1979. Frequent causes of meningitis in adults.
Am J Med 1981; 71:199.
10. Hieber JP, Nelson JD. A pharmacologic evaluation of penicillin in children with
purulent meningitis. N Engl J Med 1977; 297:410.
11. Tunkel AR, Hartman BJ, Kaplan SL, et al. Practice guidelines for the management
of bacterial meningitis. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39:1267.
12. Tan TQ, Schutze GE, Mason EO Jr, Kaplan SL. Antibiotic therapy and acute outcome
of meningitis due to Streptococcus pneumoniae considered intermediately
susceptible to broad-spectrum cephalosporins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
1994; 38:918.
13. Hameed N, Tunkel AR. Treatment of Drug-resistant Pneumococcal Meningitis.
Curr Infect Dis Rep 2010; 12:274.
14. Klugman KP, Walsh AL, Phiri A, Molyneux EM. Mortality in penicillin-resistant
pneumococcal meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2008; 27:671.
15. McNamara LA, Potts C, Blain AE, et al. Detection of Ciprofloxacin-Resistant, β-
Lactamase-Producing Neisseria meningitidis Serogroup Y Isolates - United States,
2019-2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020; 69:735.
16. Taormina G, Campos J, Sweitzer J, et al. β-Lactamase-Producing, Ciprofloxacin-
Resistant Neisseria meningitidis Isolated From a 5-Month-Old Boy in the United
States. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2021; 10:379.
17. Oliver SE, Rubis AB, Soeters HM, et al. Secondary Cases of Invasive Disease
Caused by Encapsulated and Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae - 10 U.S.
Jurisdictions, 2011-2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2023; 72:386.
18. Aguilar J, Urday-Cornejo V, Donabedian S, et al. Staphylococcus aureus meningitis:
case series and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2010; 89:117.
19. Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, et al. Clinical practice guidelines by the infectious
diseases society of america for the treatment of methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children. Clin Infect Dis 2011;
52:e18.
20. Beer R, Engelhardt KW, Pfausler B, et al. Pharmacokinetics of intravenous linezolid
in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma in neurointensive care patients with
staphylococcal ventriculitis associated with external ventricular drains. Antimicrob
Agents Chemother 2007; 51:379.
21. Myrianthefs P, Markantonis SL, Vlachos K, et al. Serum and cerebrospinal fluid
concentrations of linezolid in neurosurgical patients. Antimicrob Agents
Chemother 2006; 50:3971.
22. Villani P, Regazzi MB, Marubbi F, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid linezolid concentrations
in postneurosurgical central nervous system infections. Antimicrob Agents
Chemother 2002; 46:936.
23. Yogev R, Damle B, Levy G, Nachman S. Pharmacokinetics and distribution of
linezolid in cerebrospinal fluid in children and adolescents. Pediatr Infect Dis J
2010; 29:827.
24. Ntziora F, Falagas ME. Linezolid for the treatment of patients with central nervous
system infection. Ann Pharmacother 2007; 41:296.
25. Kaplan SL, Patrick CC. Cefotaxime and aminoglycoside treatment of meningitis
caused by gram-negative enteric organisms. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1990; 9:810.
26. Fong IW, Tomkins KB. Review of Pseudomonas aeruginosa meningitis with special
emphasis on treatment with ceftazidime. Rev Infect Dis 1985; 7:604.
27. Klugman KP, Dagan R. Randomized comparison of meropenem with cefotaxime
for treatment of bacterial meningitis. Meropenem Meningitis Study Group.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995; 39:1140.
28. Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, et al. Outcome of cephalosporin treatment
for serious infections due to apparently susceptible organisms producing
extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: implications for the clinical microbiology
laboratory. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39:2206.
29. Molyneux E, Nizami SQ, Saha S, et al. 5 versus 10 days of treatment with
ceftriaxone for bacterial meningitis in children: a double-blind randomised
equivalence study. Lancet 2011; 377:1837.
30. Karageorgopoulos DE, Valkimadi PE, Kapaskelis A, et al. Short versus long
duration of antibiotic therapy for bacterial meningitis: a meta-analysis of
randomised controlled trials in children. Arch Dis Child 2009; 94:607.
31. Jadavji T, Biggar WD, Gold R, Prober CG. Sequelae of acute bacterial meningitis in
children treated for seven days. Pediatrics 1986; 78:21.
32. Snape MD, Kelly DF. Fine with five? Shorter antibiotic courses for childhood
meningitis. Lancet 2011; 377:1809.
33. Norris AH, Shrestha NK, Allison GM, et al. 2018 Infectious Diseases Society of
America Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Outpatient Parenteral
Antimicrobial Therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2019; 68:e1.
34. Waler JA, Rathore MH. Outpatient management of pediatric bacterial meningitis.
Pediatr Infect Dis J 1995; 14:89.
35. Outpatient management of bacterial meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1989; 8:258.
36. Tice AD, Strait K, Ramey R, Hoaglund PA. Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial
therapy for central nervous system infections. Clin Infect Dis 1999; 29:1394.
37. Bradley JS, Ching DK, Phillips SE. Outpatient therapy of serious pediatric infections
with ceftriaxone. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1988; 7:160.
38. Lin TY, Nelson JD, McCracken GH Jr. Fever during treatment for bacterial
meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis 1984; 3:319.
39. Oliveira CR, Morriss MC, Mistrot JG, et al. Brain magnetic resonance imaging of
infants with bacterial meningitis. J Pediatr 2014; 165:134.
40. Lieb G, Krauss J, Collmann H, et al. Recurrent bacterial meningitis. Eur J Pediatr
1996; 155:26.
41. Thigpen MC, Whitney CG, Messonnier NE, et al. Bacterial meningitis in the United
States, 1998-2007. N Engl J Med 2011; 364:2016.
42. Arditi M, Mason EO Jr, Bradley JS, et al. Three-year multicenter surveillance of
pneumococcal meningitis in children: clinical characteristics, and outcome related
to penicillin susceptibility and dexamethasone use. Pediatrics 1998; 102:1087.
43. Schuchat A, Robinson K, Wenger JD, et al. Bacterial meningitis in the United States
in 1995. Active Surveillance Team. N Engl J Med 1997; 337:970.
44. Baraff LJ, Lee SI, Schriger DL. Outcomes of bacterial meningitis in children: a meta-
analysis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1993; 12:389.
45. Mongelluzzo J, Mohamad Z, Ten Have TR, Shah SS. Corticosteroids and mortality in
children with bacterial meningitis. JAMA 2008; 299:2048.
46. Nigrovic LE, Kuppermann N, Malley R, Bacterial Meningitis Study Group of the
Pediatric Emergency Medicine Collaborative Research Committee of the American
Academy of Pediatrics. Children with bacterial meningitis presenting to the
emergency department during the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine era. Acad
Emerg Med 2008; 15:522.
47. Husain E, Chawla R, Dobson S, et al. Epidemiology and outcome of bacterial
meningitis in Canadian children: 1998-1999. Clin Invest Med 2006; 29:131.
48. Casado-Flores J, Aristegui J, de Liria CR, et al. Clinical data and factors associated
with poor outcome in pneumococcal meningitis. Eur J Pediatr 2006; 165:285.
49. Hsu HE, Shutt KA, Moore MR, et al. Effect of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on
pneumococcal meningitis. N Engl J Med 2009; 360:244.
50. Kornelisse RF, Westerbeek CM, Spoor AB, et al. Pneumococcal meningitis in
children: prognostic indicators and outcome. Clin Infect Dis 1995; 21:1390.
51. Bohr V, Rasmussen N, Hansen B, et al. Pneumococcal meningitis: an evaluation of
prognostic factors in 164 cases based on mortality and on a study of lasting
sequelae. J Infect 1985; 10:143.
52. Chávez-Bueno S, McCracken GH Jr. Bacterial meningitis in children. Pediatr Clin
North Am 2005; 52:795.
53. Roine I, Peltola H, Fernández J, et al. Influence of admission findings on death and
neurological outcome from childhood bacterial meningitis. Clin Infect Dis 2008;
46:1248.
54. Fortnum HM. Hearing impairment after bacterial meningitis: a review. Arch Dis
Child 1992; 67:1128.
55. Wald ER, Kaplan SL, Mason EO Jr, et al. Dexamethasone therapy for children with
bacterial meningitis. Meningitis Study Group. Pediatrics 1995; 95:21.
56. Dodge PR, Davis H, Feigin RD, et al. Prospective evaluation of hearing impairment
as a sequela of acute bacterial meningitis. N Engl J Med 1984; 311:869.
57. Pelkonen T, Roine I, Monteiro L, et al. Risk factors for death and severe
neurological sequelae in childhood bacterial meningitis in sub-Saharan Africa. Clin
Infect Dis 2009; 48:1107.
58. Roine I, Weisstaub G, Peltola H, LatAm Bacterial Meningitis Study Group. Influence
of malnutrition on the course of childhood bacterial meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J
2010; 29:122.
59. Kaplan SL, Schutze GE, Leake JA, et al. Multicenter surveillance of invasive
meningococcal infections in children. Pediatrics 2006; 118:e979.
60. Taylor HG, Schatschneider C, Watters GV, et al. Acute-phase neurologic
complications of Haemophilus influenzae type b meningitis: association with
developmental problems at school age. J Child Neurol 1998; 13:113.
61. Lebel MH, McCracken GH Jr. Delayed cerebrospinal fluid sterilization and adverse
outcome of bacterial meningitis in infants and children. Pediatrics 1989; 83:161.
62. Rodenburg-Vlot MB, Ruytjens L, Oostenbrink R, et al. Systematic Review: Incidence
and Course of Hearing Loss Caused by Bacterial Meningitis: In Search of an
Optimal Timed Audiological Follow-up. Otol Neurotol 2016; 37:1.
63. Roine I, Pelkonen T, Cruzeiro ML, et al. Fluctuation in hearing thresholds during
recovery from childhood bacterial meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2014; 33:253.
64. Gaschignard J, Levy C, Chrabieh M, et al. Invasive pneumococcal disease in
children can reveal a primary immunodeficiency. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 59:244.
65. Kaplan SL, Barson WJ, Lin PL, et al. Invasive Pneumococcal Disease in Children's
Hospitals: 2014-2017. Pediatrics 2019; 144.
66. Ratilal BO, Costa J, Pappamikail L, Sampaio C. Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing
meningitis in patients with basilar skull fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2015; :CD004884.