This case study examines conflicts over privacy in the workplace. It discusses two perspectives on whether companies should be able to track employees through company devices and social media accounts. Some argue that companies need to monitor employees to protect their business interests and reputation. Others argue that employees have rights to personal privacy and maintaining private social media accounts. A balanced approach is needed where companies can protect their interests but also respect employee privacy rights and only access private accounts in limited cases related to legal issues.
This case study examines conflicts over privacy in the workplace. It discusses two perspectives on whether companies should be able to track employees through company devices and social media accounts. Some argue that companies need to monitor employees to protect their business interests and reputation. Others argue that employees have rights to personal privacy and maintaining private social media accounts. A balanced approach is needed where companies can protect their interests but also respect employee privacy rights and only access private accounts in limited cases related to legal issues.
This case study examines conflicts over privacy in the workplace. It discusses two perspectives on whether companies should be able to track employees through company devices and social media accounts. Some argue that companies need to monitor employees to protect their business interests and reputation. Others argue that employees have rights to personal privacy and maintaining private social media accounts. A balanced approach is needed where companies can protect their interests but also respect employee privacy rights and only access private accounts in limited cases related to legal issues.
This case study examines conflicts over privacy in the workplace. It discusses two perspectives on whether companies should be able to track employees through company devices and social media accounts. Some argue that companies need to monitor employees to protect their business interests and reputation. Others argue that employees have rights to personal privacy and maintaining private social media accounts. A balanced approach is needed where companies can protect their interests but also respect employee privacy rights and only access private accounts in limited cases related to legal issues.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
Assignment
BBA 2Y(5th semester)
Submitted by:- Rumma shahjahan
Submitted to:- Mam nimra zia
Subject:- Business Ethics
Case study (Conflicts over privacy in workplace)
1. Companies should have the right to track employees through company
smartphones and monitor their personal Facebook and Twitter accounts. Companies monitor their employees to ensure that no harm is being done within the workplace. A professional business wants to be viewed exactly that way; professional. If an employee makes statements that are malicious or harmful to the employer’s business reputation, this could potentially lead that employee down a very difficult path due to the social media privacy laws put into place. Companies are not allowed to request or demand personal account login information from employees. The only reason an employer should have access to an account is if, and only if, a potentially legal issue within their policy reaches the surface and needs direct attention. When a company monitors an employee’s social media accounts like Facebook and Twitter, they are not only protecting themselves, but their employees as well. It is important to be aware of what your employees are posting on the Internet because posts can travel so fast via the web that it could potentially promote or destroy a company within minutes. 2. Employees should be able to maintain their personal privacy and not be tracked through their company smartphone or their Facebook and Twitter accounts. On the other hand, employees argue that they have a right to not track their personal privacy. Employers have to be careful about what information is found on an employee’s social media account. Employees have the right to keep private facts about themselves confidential and the right to some degree of personal space. In that case, company’s employers must be trust their employees. But all employees have "reasonable expectation of privacy" when they use employers equipment. Basic workplace right extend to every employee, and these include rights to freedom form discrimination, fair compensation and privacy. Employees have right to privacy in workplace applies to workers personal items, as well as storage lockers and private email accessible only by employees. Employee’s personal lives are their right and when they disturbed, it creates conflicts in workplace and employee’s interest as well. For resolve that problem, company’s employers should be used of cameras in every department of an organization rather than track the personal privacy of employees. Employers must be trust their employees because trust is the key of success of an organization.