BUS6110 Module 1 4way Test
BUS6110 Module 1 4way Test
BUS6110 Module 1 4way Test
Submitted By:
1
BUS6110: Organizational Strategy
Module 1: 4-Way Test
DECISION DESCRIPTION
The management decision involves outsourcing a significant portion of the company's
production to a third-party supplier in another country. The decision may be driven by cost-
saving opportunities, access to specialized skills, or the desire to focus on core competencies.
However, it also raises concerns about the impact on the company's employees and the
ethical considerations of working with suppliers in different labor and regulatory
environments.
2
BUS6110: Organizational Strategy
Module 1: 4-Way Test
3
BUS6110: Organizational Strategy
Module 1: 4-Way Test
articulating a clear vision for how the outsourcing decision will contribute to the company's
long-term success and the well-being of all stakeholders, the decision can be framed as
mutually beneficial. (Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2016). Business Ethics: Managing Corporate
Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. Oxford University Press.)
Transparency and Truthfulness: Implement clear and open communication regarding the
reasons for the decision to outsource production, including the potential impact on
employees, stakeholders, and the community. Reference: "The Importance of Transparency
in Business" by Forbes, discusses the benefits of transparent communication in building trust
and credibility with stakeholders.
Building Goodwill and Positive Relationships: Engage in proactive dialogue with the local
community and stakeholders to address concerns and demonstrate a commitment to ethical
and socially responsible business practices. Reference: "Corporate Social Responsibility and
Corporate Reputation: A Cross-Cultural Perspective" by Sen, S., and Bhattacharya, C. B.,
which emphasizes the link between corporate social responsibility and building positive
relationships with stakeholders.
Maximizing Benefits for All Concerned: Explore alternative options, such as partnering
with local suppliers or investing in employee training and development, to create a win-win
situation for the company, employees, and the community. Reference: "Creating Shared
Value" by Porter, M. E., and Kramer, M. R., which introduces the concept of creating shared
value by aligning business goals with societal needs.
By implementing these changes, the management's decision to outsource production can
better align with the principles of the Four-Way Test, emphasizing truth, fairness, goodwill,
and mutual benefit.
\
INTERNAL IMPACT:
1. Employee Morale and Engagement: By providing transparent communication, fair
treatment, and support for work-life balance, the changes would likely lead to
improved employee morale and engagement. Employees who feel valued and
respected are more likely to be motivated and committed to their work, leading to
higher productivity and lower turnover rates.
2. Organizational Culture: Fostering a culture of fairness, empathy, and open
communication can contribute to a positive work environment. This can lead to
stronger relationships among employees, increased collaboration, and a shared sense
of purpose, ultimately shaping a more cohesive and supportive organizational culture.
4
BUS6110: Organizational Strategy
Module 1: 4-Way Test
EXTERNAL IMPACT:
1. Customer Satisfaction: A positive internal environment, where employees feel
valued and supported, can translate into better customer service and higher customer
satisfaction. Satisfied and engaged employees are more likely to deliver exceptional
service, positively impacting the organization's reputation and customer loyalty.
2. Public Image: Organizations that prioritize fairness, transparency, and employee
well-being are often viewed more favourably by the public. This can enhance the
organization's reputation and contribute to a positive public image, potentially
attracting more customers and top talent.
3. Stakeholder Relationships: Demonstrating a commitment to ethical and fair
practices can strengthen relationships with stakeholders, including suppliers, partners,
and the community. This can lead to increased trust and collaboration, creating a more
favourable external environment for the organization.
Overall, aligning the management decision with the Four-Way Test and implementing
changes to promote truthfulness, fairness, goodwill, and benefits to all concerned can lead to
a more positive internal environment, improved employee well-being, and a stronger
reputation in the external environment.
In summary, these changes can lead to a more positive and sustainable internal and external
environment for the organization, characterized by higher levels of trust, loyalty, and
engagement among employees and stakeholders.
5
BUS6110: Organizational Strategy
Module 1: 4-Way Test
the cultural context and ensuring that the proposed action is respectful and sensitive to
the cultural expectations of the new market (Hofstede, 2001).
2. Legal and Regulatory Compliance: Ensure that the decision or action complies with
the legal and regulatory requirements of the new market. This may involve adapting
the decision to align with local laws, regulations, and industry standards, as well as
obtaining necessary permits and certifications (Doz & Prahalad, 1986).
3. Stakeholder Engagement: Identify and engage with local stakeholders such as
community leaders, government officials, and industry experts to understand their
perspectives and gain their support for the decision or action. Building strong
relationships with local stakeholders can help in gaining acceptance and trust in the
new market (Sethi & Steidlmeier, 1993).
4. Communication and Transparency: Communicate the decision or action transparently
and effectively to all stakeholders in the new market, ensuring that the information is
clear, culturally appropriate, and accessible to everyone involved. This may involve
using local languages, adapting communication styles, and addressing potential
misunderstandings (Gudykunst & Kim, 2003).
By incorporating these changes, management decisions and actions can be made more
effective and applicable in a new international or domestic market environment.
6
BUS6110: Organizational Strategy
Module 1: 4-Way Test
REFERENCE
Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2016). Business Ethics: Managing Corporate Citizenship
and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. Oxford University Press
Doz, Y. L., & Prahalad, C. K. (1986). Controlled variety: A challenge for human
resource management in the MNC. Human Resource Management, 25(1), 55-71.
Gifford, J. (2019). The Four-Way Test: A Practical Guide. CreateSpace Independent
Publishing Platform.
Ellen, P. S., Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (2006). Building corporate associations:
Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the
Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 147-157.
Gudykunst, W. B., & Kim, Y. Y. (2003). Communicating with strangers: An
approach to intercultural communication. McGraw-Hill.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors,
institutions, and organizations across nations. Sage publications.
Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2017). Human Resource
Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage. McGraw-Hill Education
Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). SAGE
Publications.
Rotary International. (2021). The Four-Way Test. Retrieved
from https://www.rotary.org/en/our-code-ethics-four-way-test
Sethi, S. P., & Steidlmeier, P. (1993). Toward a theory of business. Business Ethics
Quarterly, 3(2), 201-221.
Shaw, W. H., & Barry, V. (2016). Moral Issues in Business. Cengage Learning.
Steers, R. M., Nardon, L., & Sanchez-Runde, C. J. (2019). Management Across
Cultures: Developing Global Competencies (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
"The Four-Way Test." Rotary International. https://www.rotary.org/en/about-
rotary/rotary-code-of-ethics
7
BUS6110: Organizational Strategy
Module 1: 4-Way Test
Tr Mishra, K. E. (2012). The impact of ethical leadership, the internal audit function,
and moral intensity on a financial reporting decision. Journal of Business Ethics,
109(3), 351-366.