Architectural Theory Since 1960: Garyfox@usc - Edu

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 11

Architectural Theory Since 1960

Arch 314 | 3 Units | Fall 2017


Monday and Wednesday 10:00am-11:20am
Mudd Hall 101

Denise Scott Brown and Robert Venturi, Learning from Las Vegas, 1972

Gary Fox
garyfox@usc.edu

“Theory” is ambiguous. A form of mediation between idea and reality, theory has been
deployed as justifcation, as explanation, as tool for analysis, as propaganda, or as architecture
itself. Discourse is predicated on theory.

This lecture course takes up an expanded notion of architectural theory, considering the role
theoretical production has played vis-à-vis both the discipline and broader social, political, and
technological conditions. Through such a lens, the course surveys a history of architectural
discourse from roughly 1960 to the present. The course opens briefy with the re-theorizing of
modernism that took place more or less after the fact in the early 1960s. It turns to the various
theoretical challenges to modernism articulated well into the 1970s. The course considers the
emergence of a self-identifed postmodernism during this same period, and then takes up the
rise of critical theory in the 1980s and the challenges posed to it in the 1990s. The course

1
concludes by focusing on selected topics from the contemporary debate in the 2000s. With a
focus on key fgures, texts, and debates, the course reconstructs a history of contemporary
architectural discourse, highlighting the ideas and theories that have enacted or destabilized
architectural thought. Students are encouraged to develop their own positions with regard to
these debates, both theoretical and practical.

Learning Objectives

This course aims to encourage students to:


1. Be able to situate and analyze cultural objects, concepts, and debates within their
broader political, economic, and social contexts
2. Establish associations and comparisons between diverse historical objects, both
synchronically and diachronically
3. Hone analytic and critical skills through a variety of strategies including close analysis of
images and texts, written responses, and in-class discussions
4. Actively participate in and lead discussions
5. Develop original arguments and theses, with a focus on making connections across
periods and disciplines

Course Requirements

1. Attendance and Participation: 10%


Students are required to attend each lecture and to complete the assigned required
reading before each class session. Readings will be posted on Blackboard.

2. Reading Responses: 15%


Students will be expected to submit a brief, 1-page commentary that responds to the
required readings for the week. This should take the form of an analytical summary that
briefy states and comments on the main points of each reading. Responses are to be
submitted electronically on Blackboard, and are due no later than 5:00 p.m. the Sunday
evening following the week's lectures. No late reading responses will be accepted.

3. Group Presentation: 15%


Students will be asked to participate in a group presentation on one of the student
presentation days scheduled throughout the semester. Groups will present on a theme
drawn from the reading that is characteristic of the decade surveyed. Presentations
should connect themes to at least one architectural project not discussed in lecture.
Students will sign up for a presentation day by Week 2.

4. Midterm Examination: 25%

5. Final Examination: 35%

2
Course Policies

No late work will be accepted—i.e. no partial credit will be given for work that is turned in late.
Being absent on a day that a quiz, exam, presentation, paper, or fnal is held or due can lead to
a student receiving an “F” for that assignment.

The School of Architecture's attendance policy allows a student to miss the equivalent of one
week of class sessions (in our case, that means two class sessions) without penalty. If additional
absences are required for medical reasons or a family emergency, a pre-approved academic
reason, or religious observance, the situation should be discussed, in advance if possible, with
me. For each absence above this number, the fnal grade may be lowered by 1/3 point (i.e. from
A to A- for one unexcused absence, from A- to B+ for two; from B+ to B for three, etc.).

Any student not in class after the frst 10 minutes is considered to be tardy. Three tardies
constitute one unexcused absence. Students who are physically present but mentally absent
(whether because they are asleep or distracted by technology) will be marked as absent. Leaving
class before it ends, or taking an extended bathroom or water break that lasts 1/3 of the class
time or longer, will be considered an unexcused absence.

Grading Scale

A 95-100
A- 90-94
B+ 87-89
B 83-86
B- 80-82
C+ 77-79
C 73-76
C- 70-72
D+ 67-69
D 63-66
D- 60-62
F 59 and below

3
Course Overview

August 21 Course Introduction: “Architectural Theory”?


August 23 Theorizing Modernity
August 28 Play
August 30 Authorship
September 4 LABOR DAY: NO CLASS
September 6 Environment
September 11 Student Presentations: Themes of the 1960s
September 13 Pop
September 18 Behavior
September 20 Autonomy
September 25 Historicism and Multivalence
September 27 Student Presentations: Themes of the 1970s
October 2 Midterm Review
October 4 MIDTERM EXAM
October 9 Events
October 11 Site, Place, Region
October 16 Consumption and Late Capitalism
October 18 Deconstruction
October 23 Student Presentations: Themes of the 1980s
October 25 Geometry
October 30 Diagrams and Fields
November 1 Control
November 6 The Mediated Body
November 8 Student Presentations: Themes of the 1990s
November 13 Ornament
November 15 The Generic
November 20 Platforms
November 22 Thanksgiving Break: NO CLASS
November 27 Student Presentations: Themes of the 2000s
November 29 Conclusion and Final Review

December 11 FINAL EXAM


8:00-10:00 am To confrm the date and time of the fnal for this class, consult the USC Schedule of
Classes at www.usc.edu/soc

4
Weekly Topics and Reading Assignments

August 21 Introduction: What do we mean by “architectural theory”?

August 23 Prelude: Theorizing Modernity

Required Reading:
Clement Greenberg, “Modernist Painting” (1960, rev. 1965), in The New Art (New
York: E. P. Dutton & Co., Inc., 1966): pp. 100-110

Reyner Banham, Theory and Design in the First Machine Age (London: The
Architectural Press, 1960): pp. 9-12; 320-330

August 28 Play

Required Reading:
Constant Nieuwenhuys, “Another City for Another Life,” Internationale Situationniste
No. 3, December 1959, in Constant: New Babylon (The Hague: Gemeentemuseum
Den Haag, 2015): pp. 162-167

Guy Debord, “The Organization of Territory” (1967), in The Society of the Spectacle
(Detroit: Black & Red, 1970): pp. 90-96

August 30 Authorship

Required Reading:
Robert Venturi, Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture (New York: The
Museum of Modern Art, 1966): pp. 22-23; 30-38

Roland Barthes, “The Death of the Author” (1967), in Image, Music, Text (New York:
Hill and Wang, 1977): pp. 142-148

Michel Foucault, “What is an Author?” (1969), in The Foucault Reader (New York:
Pantheon Books, 1984): pp. 101-120

September 4 LABOR DAY: ***NO CLASS***

September 6 Environment

Required Reading:
Ian McHarg, “Man and Environment” (1963), in To Heal the Earth: Selected Writings
of Ian L. McHarg (Washington, DC: Island Press, 2007): pp. 10-23

Buckminster Fuller, Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth (Carbondale: Southern


Illinois University Press, 1968): chs. 4 and 8

September 11 Themes of the 1960s: Student Presentations

5
September 13 Pop

Required Reading:
Hans Hollein, “Alles ist Architektur,” Bau 1/2, 1968: pp. 460-462 (plus images)

Denise Scott Brown, “Learning from Pop,” Casabella 359/360, 1971: pp. 15-23

Robert Venturi, Denise Scott Brown, and Steven Izenour, Learning from Las Vegas
(Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1972): pp. 3-19 (plus images)

September 18 Behavior

Required Reading:
Joachim Wohlwill, “The Environment is Not in the Head!” in Environmental Design
Research Vol. 2 (Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson, & Ross, Inc., 1973): pp.
166-181

Jean Baudrillard, “The Precession of Simulacra,” Art & Text No. 11, September 1983:
pp. 109-137

September 20 Autonomy

Required Reading:
Peter Eisenman, “Notes on Conceptual Architecture: Towards a Defnition,”
Casabella 359/360, November-December 1971: pp. 48-58

Colin Rowe, Introduction to Five Architects (New York: Wittenborn, 1972): pp. 3-7

September 25 Historicism and Multivalence

Required Reading:
Robert A. M. Stern, “Gray Architecture as Post-Modernism, or, Up and Down from
Orthodoxy,” L'Architecture d'Aujourd'hui 186, August-September 1976: pp. 242-245

Charles Jencks, “Post-Modern Architecture,” in The Language of Post-Modern


Architecture (New York: Rizzoli, 1977): pp. 308-316

Alan Colquhoun, “Historicism and the Limits of Semiology” (1972), in Collected


Essays in Architectural Criticism (London: Black Dog Publishing, 2009): pp. 97-105

September 27 Themes of the 1970s: Student Presentations

October 2 Midterm Review

October 5 MIDTERM EXAM

6
October 9 Events

Required Reading:
Bernard Tschumi, The Manhattan Transcripts (London: Academy Editions, 1981):
entire book (mostly images)

October 11 Site, Place, Region

Required Reading:
Edward Said, Orientalism (New York: Vintage Books, 1979; 2003): pp. 1-28

Kenneth Frampton, “Towards a Critical Regionalism: Six Points for an Architecture of


Resistance,” in Hal Foster, The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture (New
York: The New Press, 1983): pp. 16-30

October 16 Consumption and Late Capitalism

Required Reading:
Frederic Jameson, “Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism,” New
Left Review No. 146, 1984: pp. 53-92

October 18 Deconstruction

Required Reading:
Philip Johnson and Mark Wigley, Deconstructivist Architecture (New York: Museum
of Modern Art and Boston: Little, Brown, 1988): pp. 10-20

Catherine Ingraham, “Milking Deconstruction, or Cow Was the Show?” Inland


Architect, September/October 1988: pp. 61-65

October 23 Themes of the 1980s: Student Presentations

October 25 Geometry

Required Reading:
Greg Lynn, “Multiplicitous and Inorganic Bodies,” Assemblage 19, December 1992:
pp. 32-49

Greg Lynn, “Architectural Curvilinearity: The Folded, The Pliant, and the Supple,”
Architectural Design Vol. 63 No. 3/4, March-April 1993: pp. 8-15

October 30 Diagrams and Fields

Required Reading:
Toyo Ito, “Diagram Architecture,” El Croquis 77: Kazuyo Sejima, 1996: pp. 18-24

Stan Allen, “From Object to Field,” AD: Architecture After Geometry Vol 67 No. 5/6,
May-June 1997: pp. 24-31

7
November 1 Control

Required Reading:
Michel Foucault, selections from “The Body of the Condemned” and “Panopticism,”
in Discipline and Punish (New York: Vintage Books, 1975; 1995): pp. 3-7 and 195-
209

Gilles Deleuze, “Postscript on the Societies of Control,” October Vol. 59, Winter
1992: pp. 3-7

November 6 The Mediated Body

Required Reading:
Beatriz Colomina, “Intimacy and Spectacle,” AAFiles 20, Fall 1990: pp. 5-14

Elizabeth Grosz, “Cyberspace, Virtuality, and the Real: Some Architectural


Refections” (1997), in Architecture from the Outside: Essays on Virtual and Real
Space (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2001): pp. 75-90

November 8 Themes of the 1990s: Student Presentations

November 13 Ornament

Required Reading:
Jeffrey Kipnis, “The Cunning of Cosmetics,” El Croquis 84, 1997: pp. 22-29

Farshid Moussavi and Michael Kubo, “Introduction,” The Function of Ornament


(Barcelona: ACTAR, 2006): n.p.

November 15 The Generic

Required Reading:
Rem Koolhaas, “Junkspace,” October 100, Spring 2002: pp. 175-190

November 20 Platforms

Required Reading:
David Joselit, “Formats,” in After Art (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012):
pp. 55-84

Sylvia Lavin, “Too Much Information,” Artforum Vol. 53 No. 1, September 2014: pp.
347-353, 398

November 22 THANKSGIVING BREAK ***NO CLASS***

November 27 Themes of the 2000s: Student Presentations

November 29 Conclusion and Final Review

8
December 11 FINAL EXAM
8:00-10:00 am To confrm the date and time of the fnal for this class, consult the USC Schedule of
Classes at www.usc.edu/soc.

9
Academic Conduct
USC seeks to maintain an optimal learning environment. General principles of academic honesty
include the concept of respect for the intellectual property of others, the expectation that
individual work will be submitted unless otherwise allowed by an instructor, and the obligations
both to protect one’s own academic work from misuse by others as well as to avoid using
another’s work as one’s own. All students are expected to understand and abide by these
principles. Plagiarism – presenting someone else’s ideas as your own, either verbatim or recast in
your own words – is a serious academic offense with serious consequences. Please familiarize
yourself with the discussion of plagiarism in SCampus in Part B, Section 11, “Behavior Violating
University Standards” https://policy.usc.edu/scampus-part-b/. Other forms of academic dishonesty
are equally unacceptable.

Discrimination, sexual assault, and harassment are not tolerated by the university. You are
encouraged to report any incidents to the Offce of Equity and Diversity http://equity.usc.edu/ or
to the Department of Public Safety http://capsnet.usc.edu/department/department-public-
safety/online-forms/contact-us. This is important for the safety whole USC community. Another
member of the university community – such as a friend, classmate, advisor, or faculty member –
can help initiate the report, or can initiate the report on behalf of another person. The Center for
Women and Men http://www.usc.edu/student-affairs/cwm/ provides 24/7 confdential support,
and the sexual assault resource center webpage sarc@usc.edu describes reporting options and
other resources.

Support Systems
A number of USC’s schools provide support for students who need help with scholarly writing.
Check with your advisor or program staff to fnd out more. Students whose primary language is
not English should check with the American Language Institute http://dornsife.usc.edu/ali, which
sponsors courses and workshops specifcally for international graduate students. The Offce of
Disability Services and Programs
http://sait.usc.edu/academicsupport/centerprograms/dsp/home_index.html provides certifcation
for students with disabilities and helps arrange the relevant accommodations. If an offcially
declared emergency makes travel to campus infeasible, USC Emergency Information
http://emergency.usc.edu/ will provide safety and other updates, including ways in which
instruction will be continued by means of blackboard, teleconferencing, and other technology.

Religious Holidays
The University recognizes the diversity of our community and the potential for conficts involving
academic activities and personal religious observation. The university provides a guide to such
observances for reference and suggests that any concerns about lack of attendance or inability to
participate fully in the course activity be fully aired at the start of the term. As a general principle,
students should be excused from class for these events if properly documented and if provisions can be
made to accommodate the absence and make up the lost work. Constraints on participation that confict
with adequate participation in the course and cannot be resolved to the satisfaction of the faculty and the
student need to be identifed prior to the drop add date for registration. After the drop add date the
University and the School of Architecture shall be the sole arbiter of what constitutes appropriate
attendance and participation in a given course. Any student concerned about missing class for a
recognized religious holiday should bring this matter up with your instructor at the start of the semester.
A list of recognized religious holidays may be found at:
http://www.usc.edu/programs/religious_life/calendar/

10
Student Counseling Services (SCS) - (213) 740-7711 – 24/7 on call
Free and confdential mental health treatment for students, including short-term psychotherapy, group
counseling, stress ftness workshops, and crisis intervention. https://engemannshc.usc.edu/counseling/

National Suicide Prevention Lifeline - 1-800-273-8255


Provides free and confdential emotional support to people in suicidal crisis or emotional distress 24
hours a day, 7 days a week. http://www.suicidepreventionlifeline.org

Relationship & Sexual Violence Prevention Services (RSVP) - (213) 740-4900 - 24/7 on call
Free and confdential therapy services, workshops, and training for situations related to gender-based
harm. https://engemannshc.usc.edu/rsvp/

Sexual Assault Resource Center


For more information about how to get help or help a survivor, rights, reporting options, and additional
resources, visit the website: http://sarc.usc.edu/

Offce of Equity and Diversity (OED)/Title IX compliance – (213) 740-5086


Works with faculty, staff, visitors, applicants, and students around issues of protected class.
https://equity.usc.edu/

Bias Assessment Response and Support


Incidents of bias, hate crimes and microaggressions need to be reported allowing for appropriate
investigation and response. https://studentaffairs.usc.edu/bias-assessment-response-support/

Student Support & Advocacy – (213) 821-4710


Assists students and families in resolving complex issues adversely affecting their success as a student EX:
personal, fnancial, and academic. https://studentaffairs.usc.edu/ssa/

Diversity at USC
Tabs for Events, Programs and Training, Task Force (including representatives for each school),
Chronology, Participate, Resources for Students. https://diversity.usc.edu/

USC Emergency Information


Provides safety and other updates, including ways in which instruction will be continued if an offcially
declared emergency makes travel to campus infeasible, http://emergency.usc.edu

USC Department of Public Safety – 213-740-4321 (UPC) and 323-442-1000 (HSC) for 24-hour
emergency assistance or to report a crime.
Provides overall safety to USC community. http://dps.usc.edu

11

You might also like