Ratios IBMI
Ratios IBMI
Ratios IBMI
Current Ratio
The Current Ratio measures a firm’s ability to pay off its short-term
liabilities with its current assets. The current ratio is an important measure
of liquidity because short-term liabilities are due within the next year.
This means that a company has a limited amount of time in order to raise
the funds to pay for these liabilities. Current assets like cash, cash
equivalents, and marketable securities can easily be converted into cash in
the short term. This means that companies with larger amounts of current
assets will more easily be able to pay off current liabilities when they
become due without having to sell off long-term, revenue-generating
assets.
The current ratio helps investors and creditors understand the liquidity of a
company and how easily that company will be able to pay off its current
liabilities. This ratio expresses a firm’s current debt in terms of current
assets. So a current ratio of 4 would mean that the company has 4 times
more current assets than current liabilities.
A higher current ratio is always more favorable than a lower current ratio
because it shows the company can more easily make current debt
payments.
Example:
As you can see, the pizzeria only has enough current assets to pay off 25
percent of its current liabilities. This shows that Alberto’s Pizzeria is highly
leveraged and highly risky. Banks would prefer a current ratio of at least 1
or 2, so that all the current liabilities would be covered by the current
assets. Since the pizzeria’s ratio is so low, it is unlikely that it will get
approved for the loan.
Quick Ratio
The Quick Ratio or Acid Test Ratio measures the ability of a company to
pay its current liabilities when they come due with only quick assets. Quick
assets are current assets that can be converted to cash within 90 days or in
the short-term. Cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments or
marketable securities, and current accounts receivable are
considered quick assets.
The acid test of finance shows how well a company can quickly convert its
assets into cash in order to pay off its current liabilities. It also shows the
level of quick assets to current liabilities.
The quick ratio is calculated by dividing quick assets (cash, cash
equivalents, short-term investments, and current receivables) by current
liabilities:
Higher quick ratios are more favorable for companies because it shows
there are more quick assets than current liabilities. A company with a quick
ratio of 1 indicates that quick assets equal current assets. This also shows
that the company could pay off its current liabilities without selling any long-
term assets. An acid ratio of 2 shows that the company has twice as many
quick assets than current liabilities.
Example:
Let’s assume Jim’s Clothing Store is applying for a loan to remodel the
storefront. The bank asks Jim for a detailed balance sheet, so it can
compute the quick ratio. Jim’s balance sheet included cash of $10,000,
accounts receivable of $5,000, stock investments of $1,000, and current
liabilities of $15,000.
As you can see Jim’s quick ratio is 1.07. This means that Jim can pay off all
of his current liabilities with quick assets and still have some quick assets
left over.
Profit Margin
The Profit Margin Ratio, also called the Return on Sales Ratio, compares
the earnings reported by a business to its sales. It is a key indicator of the
financial health of an organization.
Creditors and investors use this ratio to measure how well a company can
convert sales into net income. Investors want to make sure profits are high
enough to distribute dividends while creditors want to make sure the
company has enough profits to pay back its loans. An extremely low-profit
margin formula would indicate the expenses are too high and the
management needs to budget and cut expenses.
The profit margin ratio formula can be calculated by dividing net income by
net sales:
The profit margin ratio directly measures what percentage of sales is made
up of net income. In other words, it measures how much profits are
produced at a certain level of sales.
This ratio also indirectly measures how well a company manages its
expenses relative to its net sales. That is why companies strive to achieve
higher ratios. They can do this by either generating more revenues why
keeping expenses constant or keep revenues constant and lower
expenses. Since most of the time generating additional revenues is much
more difficult than cutting expenses, managers generally tend to reduce
spending budgets to improve their profit ratio.
Example:
Peter’s Fishing Shop is an outdoor fishing store that selling lures and other
fishing gear to the public. Last year Peter had the best year in sales he has
ever had since she opened the business 10 years ago. Last year Peter’s
net sales were $1,000,000 and his net income was $100,000.
As you can see, Peter only converted 10 percent of his sales into profits.
Contrast that with this year’s numbers of $800,000 of net sales and
$200,000 of net income:
This year Peter may have made fewer sales, but he cut expenses and was
able to convert more of these sales into profits with a ratio of 25 percent.
The return on assets ratio measures how effectively a company can earn a
return on its investment in assets. In other words, ROA shows how
efficiently a company can convert the money used to purchase assets into
net income or profits.
A positive ROA ratio usually indicates an upward profit trend as well. ROA
is most useful for comparing companies in the same industry as different
industries use assets differently. For instance, construction companies use
large, expensive equipment while software companies use computers and
servers.
Example:
As you can see, Charlie’s ratio is 25 percent. This means that for every
dollar in assets, Charlie’s company earned 25 cents in profit. The number
will vary widely across different industries, however ROAs over 5% are
generally considered good. Investors would have to compare Charlie’s
return with other construction companies in his industry to get a true
understanding of how well Charlie is managing his assets.
That being said, investors want to see a high return on equity ratio because
this indicates that the company is using its investors’ funds effectively.
Higher ratios are almost always better than lower ratios but have to be
compared to other companies’ ratios in the industry. Since every industry
has different levels of investors and income, ROE can’t be used to compare
companies outside of their industries very effectively.
Example:
$100,000 / $50,000 = 2
As you can see, Tom’s ROE is 2. This means that every dollar of common
shareholder’s equity earned about $2 this year. In other words,
shareholders saw a 200 percent return on their investment. Tom’s ratio is
most likely considered high for his industry. An average of 5 to 10 years of
ROE ratios will give investors a better picture of the growth of this
company.
Generally, any positive ROI is considered a good return. This means that
the total cost of the investment was recouped in addition to some profits left
over. A negative return on investment means that the revenues weren’t
even enough to cover the total costs. That being said, higher return rates
are always better than lower return rates.
Example:
As you can see, Richard’s return on investment is 2.5. This means that
Richard made $2.50 for every dollar that he invested in the liquid metals
company. This investment was extremely efficient because it increased by
250%.
Debt Ratio
The Debt Ratio measures the proportion of assets paid for with debt. One
can use the ratio to reach conclusions about the solvency of a business. A
high ratio implies that the bulk of company financing is coming from debt;
this is a risky financial structure since the borrower is at risk of not being
able to pay for the associated interest expense or paying back the principal.
A low debt ratio reflects a conservative financing strategy of using only
equity to pay for assets.
The debt ratio is calculated as total liabilities divided by total assets. The
formula is:
Lenders and creditors use the debt ratio to estimate the amount of lending
risk they will incur by extending credit to an organization. They are more
likely to lend when the debt ratio is closer to 0% than when the ratio is
closer to 100% (or more).
Example:
Jim’s Guitar Shop is thinking about building an addition onto the back of its
existing building for more storage. Jim consults with his banker about
applying for a new loan. The bank asks for Jim’s balance to examine his
overall debt levels. The banker discovers that Jim has total assets of
$100,000 and total liabilities of $25,000. Jim’s debt ratio would be
calculated like this:
As you can see, Jim only has a debt ratio of 0.25. In other words, Jim has 4
times as many assets as he has liabilities. This is a relatively low ratio and
implies that Jim will be able to pay back his loan. Jim shouldn’t have a
problem getting approved for his loan.
Example:
Creditors view a higher debt to equity ratio as risky because it shows that
the investors haven’t funded the operations as much as creditors have.
This could mean that investors don’t want to fund business operations
because the company isn’t performing well.
The asset turnover ratio gives investors and creditors an idea of how a
company is managed and uses its assets to produce products and sales.
To calculate the asset turnover ratio, divide sales by total average assets:
This ratio measures how efficiently a firm uses its assets to generate sales,
so a higher ratio is always more favorable. Higher turnover ratios mean the
company is using its assets more efficiently. Lower ratios mean that the
company isn’t using its assets efficiently and most likely have management
or production problems.
For instance, a ratio of 1 means that the net sales of a company equal the
average total assets for the year. In other words, the company is
generating 1 dollar of sales for every dollar invested in assets.
Like with most ratios, the asset turnover ratio is based on industry
standards. Some industries use assets more efficiently than others. To get
a true sense of how well a company’s assets are being used, it must be
compared to other companies in its industry.
Example:
As you can see, Sally’s ratio is only 0.25. This means that for every dollar
in assets, Sally only generates 25 cents. In other words, Sally’s start-up in
not very efficient with its use of assets.
To calculate inventory turnover, divide the ending inventory figure into the
annualized cost of sales:
When there is a low rate of inventory turnover, this implies that a business
may have a flawed purchasing system that bought too many goods, or that
stocks were increased in anticipation of sales that did not occur. In both
cases, there is a high risk of inventory aging, in which case it becomes
obsolete and has little residual value.
When there is a high rate of inventory turnover, this implies that the
purchasing function is tightly managed. However, it may mean that a
business does not have the cash reserves to maintain normal inventory
levels, and so is turning away prospective sales. The latter scenario is most
likely when the amount of debt is unusually high and there are few cash
reserves.
Example:
Donny’s Furniture Company sells industrial furniture for office buildings.
During the current year, Donny reported cost of goods sold on its income
statement of $1,000,000. Donny’s inventory was $4,000,000. Donny’s
turnover is calculated like this:
As you can see, Donny’s turnover is 0.25. This means that Donny only sold
a quarter of its inventory during the year. It also implies that it would take
Donny approximately 4 years to sell his entire inventory or complete one
turn. In other words, Danny does not have very good inventory control.
To calculate the ratio, subtract any dividend payments due to the holders of
preferred stock from net income, and divide by the average number of
common shares outstanding during the measurement period. The
calculation is:
Example:
ABC Company has a net income of $1,000,000 and also must pay out
$200,000 in preferred dividends. It has both bought back and sold its own
stock during the measurement period; the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the period was 400,000 shares. ABC’s
earnings per share ratio is:
As you can see, the EPS for the year is $2. This means that if ABC
Company distributed every dollar of income to its shareholders, each share
would receive 2 dollars.
The P/E Ratio helps investors analyze how much they should pay for a
stock based on its current earnings. Companies with higher future earnings
are usually expected to issue higher dividends or have appreciating stock
in the future.
Example:
The Island Corporation stock is currently trading at $50 a share and its
earnings per share for the year is 5 dollars. Island’s P/E ratio would be
calculated like this:
$50 / $5 = 10
As you can see, the Island’s ratio is 10. This means that investors are
willing to pay 10 dollars for every dollar of earnings.
Dividend Yield
The Dividend Yield Ratio shows the number of dividends that a company
pays to its investors in comparison to the market price of its stock. Thus,
the dividend yield ratio is the return on investment to an investor if the
investor were to have bought the stock at the market price on the
measurement date.
To calculate the ratio, divide the annual dividends paid per share of stock
by the market price of the stock at the end of the measurement period. The
basic calculation is:
Investors use the dividend yield formula to compute the cash flow they are
getting from their investment in stocks. In other words, investors want to
know how much dividends they are getting for every dollar that the stock is
worth.
A company with a high dividend yield pays its investors a large dividend
compared to the fair market value of the stock. This means the investors
are getting highly compensated for their investments compared with lower
dividend-yielding stocks.
Example:
Stacy’s Bakery is an upscale bakery that sells cupcakes and baked goods
in Beverly Hills. Stacy’s is listed on a smaller stock exchange and the
current market price per share is $15. As of last year, Stacy paid $15,000 in
dividends with 1,000 shares outstanding. Stacy’s yield is computed like
this:
$15 / $15 = 1
As you can see, Stacy’s yield is one dollar. This means that Stacy’s
investors receive 1 dollar in dividends for every dollar they have invested in
the company. In other words, the investors are getting a 100 percent return
on their investment every year Stacy maintains this dividend level.