The document discusses competing views on society's energy options between fossil fuel proponents and renewable energy advocates. Fossil fuel supporters argue their products provide economic benefits and replacing them with renewables like solar and wind will cause harm. Renewable advocates say there is plenty of wind and sun and the only barrier is political influence of fossil fuel industries. The author argues the truth lies somewhere in between, and that how we use energy is as important as the source. An unexplored approach is focusing on efficient energy use rather than which sources to rely on entirely.
The document discusses competing views on society's energy options between fossil fuel proponents and renewable energy advocates. Fossil fuel supporters argue their products provide economic benefits and replacing them with renewables like solar and wind will cause harm. Renewable advocates say there is plenty of wind and sun and the only barrier is political influence of fossil fuel industries. The author argues the truth lies somewhere in between, and that how we use energy is as important as the source. An unexplored approach is focusing on efficient energy use rather than which sources to rely on entirely.
The document discusses competing views on society's energy options between fossil fuel proponents and renewable energy advocates. Fossil fuel supporters argue their products provide economic benefits and replacing them with renewables like solar and wind will cause harm. Renewable advocates say there is plenty of wind and sun and the only barrier is political influence of fossil fuel industries. The author argues the truth lies somewhere in between, and that how we use energy is as important as the source. An unexplored approach is focusing on efficient energy use rather than which sources to rely on entirely.
The document discusses competing views on society's energy options between fossil fuel proponents and renewable energy advocates. Fossil fuel supporters argue their products provide economic benefits and replacing them with renewables like solar and wind will cause harm. Renewable advocates say there is plenty of wind and sun and the only barrier is political influence of fossil fuel industries. The author argues the truth lies somewhere in between, and that how we use energy is as important as the source. An unexplored approach is focusing on efficient energy use rather than which sources to rely on entirely.
fossil fuels. Our Renewable Future On the other hand, at least some renewable Our Renewable Future, Or, What I’ve energy proponents tell us there is plenty of wind Learned In 12 Years Writing About Energy and sun, the fuel is free, and the only thing standing between us and a climate-protected By Richard Heinberg world of plentiful, sustainable, “green” energy, 21 January, 2015 jobs, and economic growth is the political clout of the coal, oil, and gas industries (here is a Post Carbon Institute taste of that line of thought). (7000 words, about 25 minutes reading time) Which message is right? Will our energy future be fueled by fossils (with or without carbon capture technology), or powered by abundant, renewable wind and sunlight? Does the truth lie somewhere between these extremes—that is, does an “all of the above” energy future await us? Or is our energy destiny located in a Terra Incognita that neither fossil fuel promoters nor renewable energy advocates talk much about? As maddening as it may be, the latter Folks who pay attention to energy and climate conclusion may be the one best supported by issues are regularly treated to two competing the facts. depictions of society’s energy options.* On one If that uncharted land had a motto, it might be, hand, the fossil fuel industry claims that its “How we use energy is as important as how we products deliver unique economic benefits, and get it.” that giving up coal, oil, and natural gas in favor of renewable energy sources like solar and 1. Unburnable Fossils and Intermittent wind will entail sacrifice and suffering (this Electricity gives a flavor of their argument). Saving the climate may not be worth the trouble, they say, Let’s start with the claim that giving up coal, oil, unless we can find affordable ways to capture and gas will hurl us back to the Stone Age. It’s true that fossil fuels have offered extraordinary