Syllabus Critical Theory

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

PHILOSOPHY 223 – CRITICAL THEORY (FEAT.

THE THEORY OF RECOGNITION)

COURSE DESCRIPTION

This study explores Axel Honneth’s “theory of recognition” by checking it against the
emancipatory critique of the early Frankfurt School. To show this, the series of lectures would reconstruct
the theoretical pre-occupation of the early Frankfurt tradition and Honneth’s main argument in the
recognition theory. Attempting to establish their theoretical link, I show that both share the same theoretical
commitment consisting in the attempt to disclose and overcome the pathologies of the social, which signify
the presence of a domination-relation within human associations. Consequently, the articulation of their
theoretical commitment shows that the conceptual spectrum cutting across these exponents does not share
a linear identity. What is shown is that the emancipatory critique has undergone a series of conceptual
transformations. This means that the disclosure of the social pathologies as well as the attempt to overcome
them receive diverse approaches which in turn necessitate a rigorous theoretical determination. I argue that
Axel Honneth adequately responds to the said demand and ably provides a more substantial model for an
emancipatory critique of today’s society than what was accounted for by the early tradition of the Frankfurt
School.

OBJECTIVES

We are preoccupied only with the following tasks:

A. reconstruct the theoretical commitment of the 1st and 2nd generation of critical theory;
B. expound the main tenets of Axel Honneth’s theory of recognition;
C. establish the continuity of the so-called theoretical commitments of critical theory.

SCOPE: CONTENT

Intro/salvo

Antonio (1983)
Bottomore (1984) (Optional)

Excursus

Marx and Engels (1988)

Fons primaria Tempus

Horkheimer (1989)
Marcuse (2009)

Horkheimer (1993)
Horkheimer & Adorno (2002)

Adorno (1991)
Benjamin (2007)
Honneth (1995)
Corollary

Zizek (2000)

EXPECTATIONS

a. Absences may be justified but must not be exaggerated.


b. Group dynamics.
c. Participation.

LEARNING PROPENSITY APPROXIMATION

Group dynamics 30%


Class Participation 40%
Paper 30%

REFERENCES

Adorno, T. (1991). On the fetish character of music and the regression of listening. The culture industry.
Selected essays on mass culture. Pp 29-60. (J.M. Bernstein, Ed.). London and New York:
Routledge.
Adorno, Theodor and Max Horkheimer. (2002). The culture industry: enlightenment as mass deception.
The dialectic of enlightenment. Philosophical fragments. Pp 94-136. (E.F.N. Jephcott, Trans.).
USA: Stanford University Press.
Antonio, R. (1983). The origin, development and contemporary status of critical theory. The sociological
quarterly 24: 325-351.
Benjamin, W. ([1955], [1968], 2007). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction.
Illuminations. Pp 217-252. (H. Zohn, Trans.; H. Arendt, Ed.). New York, USA: Schocken Books.
Bottomore, T. (1984). The frankfurt school. USA: Ellis Horwood.
Honneth, H. (1995). The Struggle for recognition: the moral grammar of social conflicts. (Joel
Anderson,
Trans.). USA: Polity Press.
Horkheimer, M (1993). Reason against itself: some remarks on enlightenment. Theory, culture, &
society 10: 79-88.
Horkheimer, M. (1989). Traditional and critical theory. Critical theory: selected essays. Pp 188-243. (M.
O’Connell, Trans.). New York: Continuum Publishing Corporation.
Marcuse, H. (2009). Philosophy and critical theory. Negations: essays in critical theory. Pp 99-118.
(Jeremy Shapiro, Trans.). UK: MayFlyBooks.
Marx, K. and F. Engels. (1988). Estranged labor. Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844 and the
communist manifesto. Pp 69-84. (Martin Milligan, Trans.). USA: Prometheus, 1988.
Zizek, S. (2000). “From history and class consciousness to the dialectic of enlightenment…and back.”
The new German critique 81: 107-123.

Prepared by:

Ismael P. Magadan, Jr.


Facilitator

You might also like