Head and Neck: Salivary Gland Tumors: An Overview
Head and Neck: Salivary Gland Tumors: An Overview
Head and Neck: Salivary Gland Tumors: An Overview
Home Genes Leukemias Solid Tumors Cancer-Prone Deep Insight Case Reports Journals Portal Teaching
X Y 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 NA
Identity
Classification
The 2005 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of SGTs is complex and comprises 10 benign and 23 malignant
entities of epithelial origin. Non epithelial neoplasms are rare, representing about 2-5% of SGTs, and will not be discussed
herein. They include, among others, haemangioma, lymphangioma, schwannoma, neurofibroma, lipoma, sarcoma, lymphoma,
and metastatic lesions (which develop preferentially in the parotid glands, and are most often of squamous cell origin). The
diversity of epithelial SGTs as well as their rarity and varied morphological aspects often makes diagnosing such neoplasms
difficult. Most primary epithelial SGTs occur in the parotid glands; about 10% occur in the submandibular glands, and less than
1% develops in the sublingual glands. Minor glands are involved in 9-23% of SGT cases. Between 54 and 79% of all tumors are
benign, and 21 to 46% are malignant. Most SGTs occurring in the sublingual glands are malignant (70-90%). Fifteen to 32% of
parotid tumors, and about 40% of submandibular lesions are carcinomas. Finally, 50% of minor gland neoplasms are cancers.
Notably, SGTs of the tongue, floor of the mouth and retromolar areas are most often malignant. Overall, pleomorphic adenoma is
the most frequent SGT, comprising about 50-60% of cases. The second most frequent benign SGT is Warthin tumor.
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma is the most common malignant SGT. Histological types vary in frequency according to location.
Pleomorphic adenoma, Warthin tumor, and mucoepidermoid carcinoma are commonly found in the parotid glands whereas
polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma usually arises in minor glands.
Because of the morphological diversity of SGTs and the rarity of some subtypes, only the most frequent entities (i.e. pleomorphic
adenoma, Warthin tumor, and mucoepidermoid carcinoma) will be discussed in detail herein. Other less frequent entities will be
mentioned briefly.
Histogenesis: PA has been shown to be of monoclonal origin. A common single cell may give rise to epithelial and modified
myoepithelial cells, as well as mesenchymal elements. The two components may share a common origin from a single
uncommitted cell (e.g. pluripotent intercalated duct cell) that may differentiate along epithelial and mesenchymal cell lines.
Alternatively, PA could develop from committed progenitor cells, e.g. epithelial basal ductal cells. Upon neoplastic
transformation, some of those cells may undergo divergent differentiation and acquire a mesenchymal phenotype.
Cytogenetics Pleomorphic adenoma presents with a highly specific and recurrent pattern of chromosome abnormalities. Four major
cytogenetic subgroups have been defined: rearrangements involving 8q12 (39%), with the t(3;8)(p21;q12) translocation
representing about half the cases; rearrangements of 12q13-15 (8%); sporadic clonal changes involving chromosomal segments
other than 8q12 or 12q13-15 (23%), and an apparently normal karyotype (30%).
Rearrangements of chromosome 8q12 in PA most often involve the 5' non-coding region of PLAG1 (pleomorphic adenoma gene-
1). Translocations involving 8q12 result in promoter swapping between PLAG1 and an ubiquitously expressed gene, leading to
activation of PLAG1 expression. The translocation partners most often involved are CTNNB1 (encoding beta-1 catenin) and
LIFR (leukemia inhibitory factor receptor), resulting from translocations t(3;8)(p21;q12) and t(5;8)(p13;q12), respectively.
PLAG1 is a developmentally regulated zinc finger gene that maps to 8q12. It is not expressed in normal salivary gland
parenchyma. The gene product is a nuclear protein that functions as a DNA-binding transcription factor. Potential PLAG1
binding sites have been found in promoter 3 of the IGF-II (insulin-like growth factor II) gene. It was shown that PLAG1 bound
IGF-II promoter 3 and stimulated its activity. IGF-II was highly expressed in PAs with up-regulated PLAG1 gene. Conversely,
IGF-II up-regulation was neither detected in PAs without abnormal PLAG1 expression, nor in normal salivary gland
parenchyma. Thus, IGF-II is a potential PLAG1 target gene. PLAG1 may play a role in PA pathogenesis by inducing growth
factor production, hence cell proliferation. It was demonstrated by Western blot and immunohistochemical analyses that PLAG1
expression was up-regulated in epithelial and myoepithelial cells, as well as in the mesenchymal component of PA.
Another mechanism of gene fusion involving PLAG1 is formation of chromosome 8 rings harboring amplification of a
pericentromeric segment with breakpoints in the FGFR1 gene at 8p12 and in the PLAG1 gene at 8q12.1. Such r(8)(p12q12.1)
rings result in a novel FGFR1-PLAG1 gene fusion. The breakpoints occur in the 5' non coding regions of both genes, leading to
promoter substitution and activation of PLAG1 expression.
Cryptic, intrachromosomal 8q rearrangements have been reported in PAs with an apparently normal karyotype. In PLAG1-
CHCHD7 gene fusions, exon 1 of CHCHD7 (coiled-coil-helix-coiled-coil-helix domain 7) was fused to either exons 3-4 or 2-4
of PLAG1, resulting in up-regulated PLAG1 protein expression. CHCHD7 maps to chromosome 8q12, 500 bp telomeric to
PLAG1. It is a newly identified member of a multifamily of proteins containing a conserved coiled-coil-helix-coiled-coil-helix
domain. CHCHD7 gene is ubiquitously expressed and its function has yet to be discovered.
TCEA1 (transcription elongation factor A 1, also known as SII) is another potential fusion partner of PLAG1 in cryptic 8q
rearrangements. The TCEA1-PLAG1 fusion transcript is formed by fusion of exon 1 of TCEA1 to exon 2 or 3 of PLAG1.
TCEA1 is an intronless, ubiquitously expressed pseudogene that maps to chromosome 3p21.3-22 (to the same region as
CTNNB1). Transcription elongation factors are involved in the regulation of the transcription of most protein-coding genes.
TCEA1 releases RNA polymerase II from transcriptional arrest due to specific DNA sequences or DNA-binding proteins.
The mechanism of such cryptic 8q rearrangements may be a promoter substitution resulting from a nonreciprocal rearrangement
such as an insertion.
The target gene in 12q13-15 rearrangements is HMGA2 (high motility group 2, also known as HMGIC). It maps to 12q14.3 and
encodes a small non-histone, chromatin-associated protein that can modulate transcription by altering the chromatin architecture.
The highest expression levels of HMGA2 gene are detected in fetal tissues whereas gene expression is undetectable in normal
adult tissues. The translocations involving 12q13-15 generate gene fusions in which the 5' part of HMGA2 (encoding the three
DNA-binding domains) are linked to various fusion partner genes. Two fusion genes, HMGA2-NFIB (nuclear factor I B gene)
and HMGA2-FHIT (fragile histidine triad gene), have been identified in PAs with ins(9;12)(p23;q12-15) and t(3;12)(p14.2;q14)
respectively. Such rearrangements lead to separation of the DNA-binding domains from the spacer, the carboxy-terminal acidic
domain, and the entire 3' UTR with its miRNA complementary sites. Those sites are targets for the miRNA let-7 and their loss
through chromosomal translocation/truncation disrupts repression of HMGA2, leading to increased expression. Such loss of
regulatory sequences has been demonstrated to promote anchorage independent-growth. Thus, HMGA2 gene rearrangements
may promote tumorigenesis in PA.
A third fusion partner gene identified in PA is WIF1 (wnt inhibitory factor 1). Since HMGA2 and WIF1 genes are located in
opposite orientation 0.7 Mb apart, the recurrent HMGA2-WIF1 fusions are likely to result from a cryptic paracentric inversion.
Other complex HMGA2 alterations have been identified in PA, such as amplifications involving an apparently intact HMGA2
sequence, a disrupted gene or the HMGA2-WIF1 fusion gene. Amplification in addition to gene fusion is a novel mechanism of
HMGA2 activation. Moreover, high-level expression of HMGA2 resulting from gene amplification has been suggested to
contribute to malignant transformation of PA.
HMGA2 plays an important role in mammalian growth (mutations of the mouse gene causes the pygmy phenotype) and may be
a key player in PA development and progression. PLAG1 gene exerts oncogenic effects by inducing growth factor production. In
opposition, the pathogenetic relevance of the fusion partners of those genes remains to be elucidated. The diversity in
chromosomal segments that participate in the translocations and the absence of a common structural or functional denominator in
those segments suggest that their role may be merely to provide the necessary elements for proper translation of the fusion
transcripts.
The PLAG1- and HMGA2-containing fusion genes may be used as diagnostic markers in PA. Detection of such genetic
hallmarks using RT-PCR or FISH technique could help diagnose morphologically ambiguous cases.
Treatment Because of the risk of recurrence and malignant transformation, radical surgical excision is required. Still, whether to perform
superficial parotidectomy or extra-capsular dissection remains debated. Additional surgery in case of recurrence exposes to an
increased risk of facial nerve injury.
Prognosis The prognosis of pleomorphic adenoma is excellent if completely removed. Recurrence rates at 5 year- and 10 year-follow-up
are 3.4% and 6.8%, respectively.
Histogenesis: WT is thought by some to originate from heterotopic salivary ductal inclusions in intra- or peri-parotid lymph
nodes. This hypothesis may explain why WT is not observed in salivary glands without incorporated lymph nodes. Other authors
posit that WT is a benign epithelial neoplasm that attracts a marked lymphoid reaction, similar to that seen in other salivary gland
neoplasms. The immunoprofile of the lymphocyte subsets is similar to that of lymphocytes in normal or reactive lymph nodes.
Analysis of the X chromosome-linked human androgen receptor gene showed that WT is non-clonal, and thus likely to be non-
neoplastic. According to some, WT may result from induction of cystic changes in branchial cleft epithelium by an inflammatory
infiltrate.
Cytogenetics Three distinct groups of WT have been defined based on cytogenetic aberrations: one with a normal karyotype, a second with
numerical changes only (loss of Y chromosome or trisomy or monosomy 5), and a third group involving structural changes with
one or two reciprocal translocations. Two neoplasms have been reported to carry a t(11;19)(q21;p13) translocation, suggesting a
link to mucoepidermoid carcinoma. The translocation was present either as the sole karyotypic anomaly or as part of a more
complex karyotype. The case displaying a complex karyotype carried a MECT1-MAML2 fusion transcript. In another series, 4
out of 11 WT cases (36%) also harbored that fusion transcript. A recent independent study reported that 2 out of 48 cases (4%)
expressed the MECT1-MAML2 fusion transcript, and that both cases were metaplastic variants of WT. But, on review, the
tumors were reclassified by the same investigators as highly suspect for MEC. The remaining 46 neoplasms were definitely
classic WTs and none displayed the fusion transcript. Hence, morphologically ambiguous cases of WT exhibiting the MECT1-
MAML2 chimeric gene should be regarded with caution.
Treatment In Warthin tumor, radical surgical excision (either superficial parotidectomy or enucleation) is curative.
Prognosis Recurrence rates are low, at about 2-5.5%; recurrence presumably results from multifocality.
Histogenesis: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma may originate from excretory duct reserve cells, but the issue remains moot.
Cytogenetics Even though MEC is the most common type of malignant SGTs, its pathogenesis and the key molecular events leading to its
development are yet to unravel. At least two partially overlapping cytogenetic subgroups have been identified, i.e. MECs with
t(11;19)(q21;p13) or variants thereof, and MECs with single or multiple trisomies, either observed as the sole abnormality or in
combination with structural rearrangements.
A recurrent t(11;19)(q21;p13) translocation has been identified in MECs of both salivary gland and bronchopulmonary origin.
Such a translocation leads to the fusion of exon 1 from a gene of unknown function at 19p13, termed mucoepidermoid carcinoma
translocated 1 (MECT1, also known as CTRC1, TORC1, or WAMTP1), with exons 2-5 of a member of mastermind-like gene
family, MAML2, at 11q21. It has been demonstrated that the resultant fusion transcript MECT1-MAML2 activated transcription
of the Notch target gene HES1 independently of ligand stimulation.
The translocation t(11;19)(q21;p13) and the MECT1-MAML2 fusion transcript have been detected in 38-81% of MEC cases.
The translocation is shared by acute leukemia, and an apparently identical rearrangement has been identified in WT. Apart from
WT, it has not been demonstrated in any other salivary gland tumor. Immunohistochemistry using an MECT1-MAML2 antibody
in fusion-positive MECs resulted in nuclear staining of all three major cell types, i.e. mucus-producing, epidermoid, and
intermediate cells. However, stromal cells did not express the fusion protein. Expression of the hybrid gene in all cell types
suggests that it may play a role early in tumor initiation. Such a distinct translocation and resulting fusion transcript may be a
useful tool in diagnosing morphologically ambiguous MEC. In addition, there is an association between transcript expression and
tumor stage, with fusion-positive tumors behaving in a less aggressive fashion. Fusion-positive patients had a significantly lower
risk of local recurrence, metastases, or tumor-related death compared to fusion-negative ones (median survival of more than 10
years compared to 1.6 years). In addition, there was a preponderance of highly differentiated low-grade tumors in fusion-positive
patients compared to the fusion-negative group.
In one study, more than 55% of the MEC cases expressed the MECT1-MAML2 fusion transcript, indicating that the fusion is
more common than suggested by conventional cytogenetic analysis. Not all fusion-positive tumors carried the translocation
t(11;19), meaning that other cryptic translocations may contribute to the disease in such cases. Several cases displayed cryptic
11;19 rearrangements and MECT1-MAML2 gene fusions. Fusions may thus be found in MECs with complex 11;19
rearrangements and in tumors with variant translocations such as t(11;17) and t(11;13), as well as in tumors with apparently
normal karyotypes and trisomies.
The second most common chromosomal abnormality was single or multiple trisomies, observed in 7 of 21 MECs in one series.
Trisomies were mostly observed in cases not harboring a t(11;19). The most frequently encountered trisomies were +7, +8, and
+X. Other recurrent abnormalities found were deletions of the terminal part of 6q. Apart from these abnormalities, the t(11;19)-
negative MECs showed a heterogeneous pattern of rearrangements with no obvious recurrent aberrations.
Very recently, deletions of CDKN2A gene have been shown to be associated with poor prognosis in MECT1-MAML2 fusion-
positive MECs. In the same study, neither activating EGFR mutations nor copy number gains at the EGFR locus was detected in
fusion-positive and fusion-negative cases. Finally, detection of HER-2 overexpression by immunohistochemistry has been
correlated to adverse clinicopathologic features in several studies.
Treatment Mucoepidermoid carcinoma is treated by wide local surgical excision, followed by radiation therapy in case of inadequate
surgical margins or pejorative microscopic features (e.g. neural invasion). Classification into high-grade and low-grade tumors
guides treatment but the behavior of intermediate-grade neoplasms remains difficult to predict.
Prognosis The 5- and 10-year survival rates are about 35% and 10-20%, respectively. Presence of distant metastases portends poor
prognosis.
Disease Acinic cell carcinoma
Clinics Acinic cell carcinoma is a low-grade malignant neoplasm that constitutes approximately 17% of SGTs and mostly develops in
the parotid gland (80%). Seventeen percent arise in the intraoral minor salivary glands (buccal mucosa, upper lip); 4% develop in
the submandibular glands and less than 1%, in the sublingual glands. It is the second most common epithelial malignancy of
salivary glands after mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Women are more often affected than men. All age groups can be affected with
an even distribution of patients from the second to the seventh decade. It usually presents as a slowly enlarging mass 1 to 3 cm in
greatest dimension. It may rarely be multinodular or fixed to skin or adjacent soft tissues. Acinic cell carcinoma is the
malignancy of salivary glands that most often occurs bilaterally. About 30% of patients experience pain and less than 10%
develop facial paralysis. At the time of diagnosis, signs and symptoms have usually been present for less than a year.
Histogenesis: Acinic cell carcinoma may arise from neoplastic transformation of the terminal duct cells (intercalated duct cells)
with differentiation toward serous acinar cells. Another theory posits that it could arise from transformation of terminally
differentiated serous acinar cells.
Cytogenetics Multiple structural and numerical aberrations have been described in acinic cell carcinoma but no specific alteration has been
identified. Loss of Y and trisomy 7, 8, and 21 have been reported. In the largest study to date, 21 (84%) of the 25 acinic cell
carcinomas showed LOH (loss of heterozygosity) in at least one of the 20 loci tested on chromosomes 1, 4, 5, 6, and 17.
Chromosomal arms 4p, 5q, 6p, and 17p were the most frequently altered, with 4p15-16, 6p25-qter, and 17p11 regions showing
the highest rate of abnormalities. In another study, analysis of different samples from a single case found evidence of
polyclonality.
Treatment Surgical excision is the mainstay of treatment in acinic cell carcinoma. Radiation therapy may be indicated in some cases.
Prognosis Acinic cell carcinoma tends to recur (35% of cases) and metastasize to cervical lymph nodes and later in the disease, to the lungs.
Large size, incomplete resection, multiple recurrences, and lymph node metastases are associated with a poor prognosis. The rate
of disease-associated death is about 16%. While tumors in the submandibular gland are more aggressive than those in the parotid
gland, acinic cell carcinomas in minor salivary glands are less aggressive than those in the major salivary glands.
Bibliography
CHCHD7-PLAG1 and TCEA1-PLAG1 gene fusions resulting from cryptic, intrachromosomal 8q rearrangements in pleomorphic salivary
gland adenomas.
Asp J, Persson F, Kost-Alimova M, Stenman G.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2006 Sep;45(9):820-8.
PMID 16736500
Head and Neck: pleomorphic salivary gland adenoma with ins(8)(q12;q11q11) (TCEA1-PLAG1).
Asp J, Stenman G.
Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol. April 2007.
Conserved mechanism of PLAG1 activation in salivary gland tumors with and without chromosome 8q12 abnormalities: identification of SII as
a new fusion partner gene.
Astrom AK, Voz ML, Kas K, Roijer E, Wedell B, Mandahl N, Van de Ven W, Mark J, Stenman G.
Cancer Res. 1999 Feb 15;59(4):918-23.
PMID 10029085
Incidence of carcinoma of the major salivary glands according to the WHO classification, 1992 to 2006: a population-based study in the United
States.
Boukheris H, Curtis RE, Land CE, Dores GM.
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention 2009;18(11):2899-906.
Histologic localization of PLAG1 (pleomorphic adenoma gene 1) in pleomorphic adenoma of the salivary gland: cytogenetic evidence of common
origin of phenotypically diverse cells.
Debiec-Rychter M, Van Valckenborgh I, Van den Broeck C, Hagemeijer A, Van de Ven WJ, Kas K, Van Damme B, Voz ML.
Lab Invest. 2001 Sep;81(9):1289-97.
PMID 11555676
Tumors of the Salivary Glands. Atlas of Tumor Pathology Fourth Series Fascicle 9.
Ellis GL, Auclair PL.
Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 2008.
KIT protein expression and analysis of c-kit gene mutation in adenoid cystic carcinoma.
Holst VA, Marshall CE, Moskaluk CA, Frierson HF Jr.
Mod Pathol. 1999 Oct;12(10):956-60.
PMID 10530560
Molecular evidence that the stromal and epithelial cells in pleomorphic adenomas of salivary gland arise from the same origin: clonal analysis
using human androgen receptor gene (HUMARA) assay.
Lee PS, Sabbath-Solitare M, Redondo TC, Ongcapin EH.
Hum Pathol. 2000 Apr;31(4):498-503.
PMID 10821498
PLAG1 gene alterations in salivary gland pleomorphic adenoma and carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma: a combined study using chromosome
banding, in situ hybridization and immunocytochemistry.
Martins C, Fonseca I, Roque L, Pereira T, Ribeiro C, Bullerdiek J, Soares J.
Mod Pathol. 2005 Aug;18(8):1048-55.
PMID 15920557
Disrupting the pairing between let-7 and Hmga2 enhances oncogenic transformation.
Mayr C, Hemann MT, Bartel DP.
Science. 2007 Mar 16;315(5818):1576-9. Epub 2007 Feb 22.
PMID 17322030
High-resolution genomic profiling of adenomas and carcinomas of the salivary glands reveals amplification, rearrangement, and fusion of
HMGA2.
Persson F, Andren Y, Winnes M, Wedell B, Nordkvist A, Gudnadottir G, Dahlenfors R, Sjogren H, Mark J, Stenman G.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2009 Jan;48(1):69-82.
PMID 18828159
High-resolution array CGH analysis of salivary gland tumors reveals fusion and amplification of the FGFR1 and PLAG1 genes in ring
chromosomes.
Persson F, Winnes M, Andren Y, Wedell B, Dahlenfors R, Asp J, Mark J, Enlund F, Stenman G.
Oncogene. 2008 May 8;27(21):3072-80. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
PMID 18059337
Recurrent fusion of MYB and NFIB transcription factor genes in carcinomas of the breast and head and neck.
Persson M, Andren Y, Mark J, Horlings HM, Persson F, Stenman G.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 3;106(44):18740-4. Epub 2009 Oct 19.
PMID 19841262
Translocation, deletion/amplification, and expression of HMGIC and MDM2 in a carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma.
Roijer E, Nordkvist A, Strom AK, Ryd W, Behrendt M, Bullerdiek J, Mark J, Stenman G.
Am J Pathol. 2002 Feb;160(2):433-40.
PMID 11839563
Cellular phone use and risk of benign and malignant parotid gland tumors--a nationwide case-control study.
Sadetzki S, Chetrit A, Jarus-Hakak A, Cardis E, Deutch Y, Duvdevani S, Zultan A, Novikov I, Freedman L, Wolf M.
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Feb 15;167(4):457-67. Epub 2007 Dec 6.
PMID 18063591
Fusion oncogenes and tumor type specificity--insights from salivary gland tumors.
Stenman G.
Semin Cancer Biol. 2005 Jun;15(3):224-35. (REVIEW)
PMID 15826837
CRTC1/MAML2 fusion transcript in high grade mucoepidermoid carcinomas of salivary and thyroid glands and Warthin's tumors:
implications for histogenesis and biologic behavior.
Tirado Y, Williams MD, Hanna EY, Kaye FJ, Batsakis JG, El-Naggar AK.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2007 Jul;46(7):708-15.
PMID 17437281
t(11;19)(q21;p13) translocation in mucoepidermoid carcinoma creates a novel fusion product that disrupts a Notch signaling pathway.
Tonon G, Modi S, Wu L, Kubo A, Coxon AB, Komiya T, O'Neil K, Stover K, El-Naggar A, Griffin JD, Kirsch IR, Kaye FJ.
Nat Genet. 2003 Feb;33(2):208-13. Epub 2003 Jan 21.
PMID 12539049
Identification of c-kit gene mutations in primary adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary gland.
Vila L, Liu H, Al-Quran SZ, Coco DP, Dong HJ, Liu C.
Mod Pathol. 2009 Oct;22(10):1296-302. Epub 2009 Jul 17.
PMID 19617878
First insights into the molecular basis of pleomorphic adenomas of the salivary glands.
Voz ML, Van de Ven WJ, Kas K.
Adv Dent Res. 2000 Dec;14:81-3. (REVIEW)
PMID 11842929
Genetic alterations in acinic cell carcinoma of the parotid gland determined by microsatellite analysis.
el-Naggar AK, Abdul-Karim FW, Hurr K, Callender D, Luna MA, Batsakis JG.
Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1998 Apr 1;102(1):19-24.
PMID 9530335
Citation
Genes ABCC10 ALCAM CDC7 CENPF EEF1B2 ERBB2 EWSR1 FGF8 FGFR1 HMGA2
KLK14 KLK8 MAML2 MCM3 MCM7 MUC6 EP300 PPP1R9B RET RET
SOX4 STMN1 THBS2 THBS2 TPX2
ins(8)(q12;q11) TCEA1/PLAG1
inv(8)(q12q12) CHCHD7/PLAG1
r(8)(p12q12) FGFR1/PLAG1
t(3;8)(p21;q12) CTNNB1/PLAG1
t(5;8)(p13;q12) LIFR/PLAG1
External links
Mitelman database ins(8)(q12;q11) [CaseList] ins(8)(q12;q11) [Transloc - MCList] TCEA1/PLAG1 Fusion - MCList]
COSMIC [ TCEA1 ] [ PLAG1 ]
Mitelman database inv(8)(q12q12) [CaseList] inv(8)(q12q12) [Transloc - MCList] CHCHD7/PLAG1 Fusion - MCList]
COSMIC [ CHCHD7 ] [ PLAG1 ]
Mitelman database r(8)(p12q12) [CaseList] r(8)(p12q12) [Transloc - MCList] FGFR1/PLAG1 Fusion - MCList]
COSMIC [ FGFR1 ] [ PLAG1 ]
Mitelman database t(3;8)(p21;q12) [CaseList] t(3;8)(p21;q12) [Transloc - MCList] CTNNB1/PLAG1 Fusion - MCList]
COSMIC [ CTNNB1 ] [ PLAG1 ]
Mitelman database t(5;8)(p13;q12) [CaseList] t(5;8)(p13;q12) [Transloc - MCList] LIFR/PLAG1 Fusion - MCList]
COSMIC [ LIFR ] [ PLAG1 ]
arrayMap Topo ( C07,C8,C08) arrayMap ((UZH-SIB Zurich) [auto + random 100 samples .. if exist ] [tabulated segments]
© Atlas of Genetics and Cytogenetics in Oncology and Haematology indexed on : Mon Dec 14 18:30:44 CET 2020
Home Genes Leukemias Solid Tumors Cancer-Prone Deep Insight Case Reports Journals Portal Teaching
jlhuret@AtlasGeneticsOncology.org.