8.

4: Molecular Orbital Theory

 Learning Objectives
Outline the basic quantum-mechanical approach to deriving molecular orbitals from atomic orbitals
Describe traits of bonding and antibonding molecular orbitals
Calculate bond orders based on molecular electron configurations
Write molecular electron configurations for first- and second-row diatomic molecules
Relate these electron configurations to the molecules’ stabilities and magnetic properties

For almost every covalent molecule that exists, we can now draw the Lewis structure, predict the electron-pair geometry, predict
the molecular geometry, and come close to predicting bond angles. However, one of the most important molecules we know, the
oxygen molecule O2, presents a problem with respect to its Lewis structure. We would write the following Lewis structure for O2:

A Lewis structure is shown. It is made up of two oxygen atoms, each with two lone pairs of electrons, bonded together with a
double bond.
This electronic structure adheres to all the rules governing Lewis theory. There is an O=O double bond, and each oxygen atom has
eight electrons around it. However, this picture is at odds with the magnetic behavior of oxygen. By itself, O2 is not magnetic, but it
is attracted to magnetic fields. Thus, when we pour liquid oxygen past a strong magnet, it collects between the poles of the magnet
and defies gravity. Such attraction to a magnetic field is called paramagnetism, and it arises in molecules that have unpaired
electrons. And yet, the Lewis structure of O2 indicates that all electrons are paired. How do we account for this discrepancy?
Magnetic susceptibility measures the force experienced by a substance in a magnetic field. When we compare the weight of a
sample to the weight measured in a magnetic field (Figure 8.4.1), paramagnetic samples that are attracted to the magnet will appear
heavier because of the force exerted by the magnetic field. We can calculate the number of unpaired electrons based on the increase
in weight.

Figure 8.4.1 : A Gouy balance compares the mass of a sample in the presence of a magnetic field with the mass with the
electromagnet turned off to determine the number of unpaired electrons in a sample.
Experiments show that each O2 molecule has two unpaired electrons. The Lewis-structure model does not predict the presence of
these two unpaired electrons. Unlike oxygen, the apparent weight of most molecules decreases slightly in the presence of an
inhomogeneous magnetic field. Materials in which all of the electrons are paired are diamagnetic and weakly repel a magnetic
field. Paramagnetic and diamagnetic materials do not act as permanent magnets. Only in the presence of an applied magnetic field
do they demonstrate attraction or repulsion.

Access for free at OpenStax 8.4.1 https://chem.libretexts.org/@go/page/38195

 levitating frog

Video 8.4.1 : Water, like most molecules, contains all paired electrons. Living things contain a large percentage of water, so they
demonstrate diamagnetic behavior. If you place a frog near a sufficiently large magnet, it will levitate. You can see videos of
diamagnetic floating frogs, strawberries, and more (levitating frog [www.youtube.com])
Molecular orbital theory (MO theory) provides an explanation of chemical bonding that accounts for the paramagnetism of the
oxygen molecule. It also explains the bonding in a number of other molecules, such as violations of the octet rule and more
molecules with more complicated bonding (beyond the scope of this text) that are difficult to describe with Lewis structures.
Additionally, it provides a model for describing the energies of electrons in a molecule and the probable location of these electrons.
Unlike valence bond theory, which uses hybrid orbitals that are assigned to one specific atom, MO theory uses the combination of
atomic orbitals to yield molecular orbitals that are delocalized over the entire molecule rather than being localized on its constituent
atoms. MO theory also helps us understand why some substances are electrical conductors, others are semiconductors, and still
others are insulators. Table 8.4.1 summarizes the main points of the two complementary bonding theories. Both theories provide
different, useful ways of describing molecular structure.
Table \(\PageIndex{1}\): Comparison of Bonding Theories
Valence Bond Theory Molecular Orbital Theory

considers bonds as localized between one pair of atoms considers electrons delocalized throughout the entire molecule

creates bonds from overlap of atomic orbitals (s, p, d…) and hybrid
combines atomic orbitals to form molecular orbitals (σ, σ*, π, π*)
orbitals (sp, sp2, sp3…)

creates bonding and antibonding interactions based on which orbitals

forms σ or π bonds
are filled

predicts molecular shape based on the number of regions of electron

predicts the arrangement of electrons in molecules
density

needs multiple structures to describe resonance

Molecular orbital theory describes the distribution of electrons in molecules in much the same way that the distribution of electrons
in atoms is described using atomic orbitals. Using quantum mechanics, the behavior of an electron in a molecule is still described
by a wave function, Ψ, analogous to the behavior in an atom. Just like electrons around isolated atoms, electrons around atoms in
molecules are limited to discrete (quantized) energies. The region of space in which a valence electron in a molecule is likely to be
found is called a molecular orbital (Ψ2). Like an atomic orbital, a molecular orbital is full when it contains two electrons with
opposite spin.
We will consider the molecular orbitals in molecules composed of two identical atoms (H2 or Cl2, for example). Such molecules
are called homonuclear diatomic molecules. In these diatomic molecules, several types of molecular orbitals occur.
The mathematical process of combining atomic orbitals to generate molecular orbitals is called the linear combination of atomic
orbitals (LCAO). The wave function describes the wavelike properties of an electron. Molecular orbitals are combinations of
atomic orbital wave functions. Combining waves can lead to constructive interference, in which peaks line up with peaks, or
destructive interference, in which peaks line up with troughs (Figure 8.4.2). In orbitals, the waves are three dimensional, and they
combine with in-phase waves producing regions with a higher probability of electron density and out-of-phase waves producing
nodes, or regions of no electron density.

Access for free at OpenStax 8.4.2 https://chem.libretexts.org/@go/page/38195

 Figure 8.4.2 : (a) When in-phase waves combine, constructive interference produces a wave with greater amplitude. (b) When out-
of-phase waves combine, destructive interference produces a wave with less (or no) amplitude.
A pair of diagrams are shown and labeled, “a” and “b.” Diagram a shows two identical waves with two crests and two troughs.
They are drawn one above the other with a plus sign in between and an equal sign to the right. To the right of the equal sign is a
much taller wave with a same number of troughs and crests. Diagram b shows two waves with two crests and two troughs, but they
are mirror images of one another rotated over a horizontal axis. They are drawn one above the other with a plus sign in between
and an equal sign to the right. To the right of the equal sign is a flat line.
There are two types of molecular orbitals that can form from the overlap of two atomic s orbitals on adjacent atoms. The two types
are illustrated in Figure 8.4.3. The in-phase combination produces a lower energy σs molecular orbital (read as "sigma-s") in which
most of the electron density is directly between the nuclei. The out-of-phase addition (which can also be thought of as subtracting
the wave functions) produces a higher energy σ molecular orbital (read as "sigma-s-star") molecular orbital in which there is a
∗
s

node between the nuclei. The asterisk signifies that the orbital is an antibonding orbital. Electrons in a σs orbital are attracted by
both nuclei at the same time and are more stable (of lower energy) than they would be in the isolated atoms. Adding electrons to
these orbitals creates a force that holds the two nuclei together, so we call these orbitals bonding orbitals. Electrons in the σ ∗
s

orbitals are located well away from the region between the two nuclei. The attractive force between the nuclei and these electrons
pulls the two nuclei apart. Hence, these orbitals are called antibonding orbitals. Electrons fill the lower-energy bonding orbital
before the higher-energy antibonding orbital, just as they fill lower-energy atomic orbitals before they fill higher-energy atomic
orbitals.

Figure 8.4.3 : Sigma (σ) and sigma-star (σ*) molecular orbitals are formed by the combination of two s atomic orbitals. The plus
(+) signs indicate the locations of nuclei.
A diagram is shown that depicts a vertical upward-facing arrow that lies to the left of all the other portions of the diagram and is
labeled, “E.” To the immediate right of the midpoint of the arrow are two circles each labeled with a positive sign, the letter S, and
the phrase, “Atomic orbitals.” These are followed by a right-facing horizontal arrow that points to the same two circles labeled with
plus signs, but they are now touching and are labeled, “Combine atomic orbitals.” Two right-facing arrows lead to the last portion
of the diagram, one facing upward and one facing downward. The upper arrow is labeled, “Subtract,” and points to two oblong
ovals labeled with plus signs, and the phrase, “Antibonding orbitals sigma subscript s superscript asterisk.” The lower arrow is
labeled, “Add,” and points to an elongated oval with two plus signs that is labeled, “Bonding orbital sigma subscript s.” The
heading over the last section of the diagram are the words, “Molecular orbitals.”
In p orbitals, the wave function gives rise to two lobes with opposite phases, analogous to how a two-dimensional wave has both
parts above and below the average. We indicate the phases by shading the orbital lobes different colors. When orbital lobes of the
same phase overlap, constructive wave interference increases the electron density. When regions of opposite phase overlap, the
destructive wave interference decreases electron density and creates nodes. When p orbitals overlap end to end, they create σ and
σ* orbitals (Figure 8.4.4). If two atoms are located along the x-axis in a Cartesian coordinate system, the two px orbitals overlap
end to end and form σpx (bonding) and σ (antibonding) (read as "sigma-p-x" and "sigma-p-x star," respectively). Just as with s-
∗
px

orbital overlap, the asterisk indicates the orbital with a node between the nuclei, which is a higher-energy, antibonding orbital.

Access for free at OpenStax 8.4.3 https://chem.libretexts.org/@go/page/38195

 Two horizontal rows of diagrams are shown. The upper diagram shows two equally-sized peanut-shaped orbitals with a plus sign in
between them connected to a merged orbital diagram by a right facing arrow. The merged diagram has a much larger oval at the
center and much smaller ovular orbitals on the edge. It is labeled, “sigma subscript p x.” The lower diagram shows two equally-
sized peanut-shaped orbitals with a plus sign in between them connected to a split orbital diagram by a right facing arrow. The split
diagram has a much larger oval at the outer ends and much smaller ovular orbitals on the inner edges. It is labeled, “sigma subscript
p x superscript asterisk”.
Figure 8.4.4 : Combining wave functions of two p atomic orbitals along the internuclear axis creates two molecular orbitals, σp and
σ .
∗
p

The side-by-side overlap of two p orbitals gives rise to a pi (π) bonding molecular orbital and a \(π^*\) antibonding molecular
orbital, as shown in Figure 8.4.5. In valence bond theory, we describe π bonds as containing a nodal plane containing the
internuclear axis and perpendicular to the lobes of the p orbitals, with electron density on either side of the node. In molecular
orbital theory, we describe the π orbital by this same shape, and a π bond exists when this orbital contains electrons. Electrons in
this orbital interact with both nuclei and help hold the two atoms together, making it a bonding orbital. For the out-of-phase
combination, there are two nodal planes created, one along the internuclear axis and a perpendicular one between the nuclei.

Figure 8.4.5 : Side-by-side overlap of each two p orbitals results in the formation of two π molecular orbitals. Combining the out-
of-phase orbitals results in an antibonding molecular orbital with two nodes. One contains the internuclear axis, and one is
perpendicular to the axis. Combining the in-phase orbitals results in a bonding orbital. There is a node (blue plane) containing the
internuclear axis with the two lobes of the orbital located above and below this node.
Two horizontal rows of diagrams are shown. The upper and lower diagrams both begin with two vertical peanut-shaped orbitals
with a plus sign in between followed by a right-facing arrow. The upper diagram shows the same vertical peanut orbitals bending
slightly away from one another and separated by a dotted line. It is labeled, “pi subscript p superscript asterisk.” The lower diagram
shows the horizontal overlap of the two orbitals and is labeled, “pi subscript p.”
In the molecular orbitals of diatomic molecules, each atom also has two sets of p orbitals oriented side by side (py and pz), so these
four atomic orbitals combine pairwise to create two π orbitals and two π orbitals. The π and π orbitals are oriented at right
∗
py
∗
py

angles to the π and π orbitals. Except for their orientation, the πpy and πpz orbitals are identical and have the same energy; they
pz
∗
pz

are degenerate orbitals. The π and π antibonding orbitals are also degenerate and identical except for their orientation. A total
∗
py
∗
pz

of six molecular orbitals results from the combination of the six atomic p orbitals in two atoms: σ and σ , π and π , π and
px
∗
px py
∗
py pz

π .
∗
pz

Access for free at OpenStax 8.4.4 https://chem.libretexts.org/@go/page/38195

 Example 8.4.1: Molecular Orbitals

Predict what type (if any) of molecular orbital would result from adding the wave functions so each pair of orbitals shown
overlap. The orbitals are all similar in energy.

Three diagrams are shown and labeled “a,” “b,” and “c.” Diagram a shows two horizontal peanut-shaped orbitals laying side-
by-side. They are labeled, “3 p subscript x and 3 p subscript x.” Diagram b shows one vertical and one horizontal peanut-
shaped orbital which are at right angles to one another. They are labeled, “3 p subscript x and 3 p subscript y.” Diagram c
shows two vertical peanut-shaped orbitals laying side-by-side and labeled, “3 p subscript y and 3 p subscript y.”

Solution
a. This is an in-phase combination, resulting in a σ3p orbital
b. This will not result in a new orbital because the in-phase component (bottom) and out-of-phase component (top) cancel out.
Only orbitals with the correct alignment can combine.
c. This is an out-of-phase combination, resulting in a π orbital.
∗
3p

 Exercise 8.4.1

Label the molecular orbital shown as σ or π, bonding or antibonding and indicate where the node occurs.

Two orbitals are shown lying end-to-end. Each has one enlarged and one small side. The small sides are facing one another

Answer
The orbital is located along the internuclear axis, so it is a σ orbital. There is a node bisecting the internuclear axis, so it is
an antibonding orbital.

Two orbitals are shown lying end-to-end. Each has one enlarged and one small side. The small sides are facing one another and are
separated by a vertical dotted line.

 Application: Computational Chemistry in Drug Design

While the descriptions of bonding described in this chapter involve many theoretical concepts, they also have many practical,
real-world applications. For example, drug design is an important field that uses our understanding of chemical bonding to
develop pharmaceuticals. This interdisciplinary area of study uses biology (understanding diseases and how they operate) to
identify specific targets, such as a binding site that is involved in a disease pathway. By modeling the structures of the binding
site and potential drugs, computational chemists can predict which structures can fit together and how effectively they will
bind (Figure 8.4.6). Thousands of potential candidates can be narrowed down to a few of the most promising candidates. These

Access for free at OpenStax 8.4.5 https://chem.libretexts.org/@go/page/38195

 candidate molecules are then carefully tested to determine side effects, how effectively they can be transported through the
body, and other factors. Dozens of important new pharmaceuticals have been discovered with the aid of computational
chemistry, and new research projects are underway.

Figure 8.4.6 : The molecule shown, HIV-1 protease, is an important target for pharmaceutical research. By designing molecules
that bind to this protein, scientists are able to drastically inhibit the progress of the disease.
A diagram of a molecule is shown. The image shows a tangle of ribbon-like, intertwined, pink and green curling lines with a
complex ball and stick model in the center.

8.4.1: Molecular Orbital Energy Diagrams

The relative energy levels of atomic and molecular orbitals are typically shown in a molecular orbital diagram (Figure 8.4.7). For a
diatomic molecule, the atomic orbitals of one atom are shown on the left, and those of the other atom are shown on the right. Each
horizontal line represents one orbital that can hold two electrons. The molecular orbitals formed by the combination of the atomic
orbitals are shown in the center. Dashed lines show which of the atomic orbitals combine to form the molecular orbitals. For each
pair of atomic orbitals that combine, one lower-energy (bonding) molecular orbital and one higher-energy (antibonding) orbital
result. Thus we can see that combining the six 2p atomic orbitals results in three bonding orbitals (one σ and two π) and three
antibonding orbitals (one σ* and two π*).

Access for free at OpenStax 8.4.6 https://chem.libretexts.org/@go/page/38195

 Figure 8.4.7 : This is the molecular orbital diagram for the homonuclear diatomic Be , showing the molecular orbitals of the
+

valence shell only. The molecular orbitals are filled in the same manner as atomic orbitals, using the Aufbau principle and Hund’s
rule.
A diagram is shown that has an upward-facing vertical arrow running along the left side labeled, “E.” At the bottom center of the
diagram is a horizontal line labeled, “sigma subscript 2 s,” that has two vertical half arrows drawn on it, one facing up and one
facing down. This line is connected to the right and left by upward-facing, dotted lines to two more horizontal lines, each labeled,
“2 s.” The line on the left has two vertical half arrows drawn on it, one facing up and one facing down while the line of the right
has one half arrow facing up drawn on it. These two lines are connected by upward-facing dotted lines to another line in the center
of the diagram, but further up from the first. It is labeled, “sigma subscript 2 s superscript asterisk.” This horizontal line has one
upward-facing vertical half-arrow drawn on it. Moving farther up the center of the diagram is a long horizontal line labeled, “sigma
subscript 2 p subscript x,” which lies below two horizontal lines. These two horizontal lines lie side-by-side, and labeled, “pi
subscript 2 p subscript y,” and, “pi subscript 2 p subscript z.” Both the bottom and top lines are connected to the right and left by
upward-facing, dotted lines to three more horizontal lines, each labeled, “2 p.” These sets of lines are connected by upward-facing
dotted lines to another single line and then pair of double lines in the center of the diagram, but farther up from the lower lines.
They are labeled, “sigma subscript 2 p subscript x superscript asterisk,” and, ““pi subscript 2 p subscript y superscript asterisk,”
and, “pi subscript 2 p subscript z superscript asterisk,” respectively. The left and right sides of the diagram have headers that read,
”Atomic orbitals,” while the center is header reads “Molecular orbitals”.
We predict the distribution of electrons in these molecular orbitals by filling the orbitals in the same way that we fill atomic
orbitals, by the Aufbau principle. Lower-energy orbitals fill first, electrons spread out among degenerate orbitals before pairing,
and each orbital can hold a maximum of two electrons with opposite spins (Figure 8.4.7). Just as we write electron configurations
for atoms, we can write the molecular electronic configuration by listing the orbitals with superscripts indicating the number of
electrons present. For clarity, we place parentheses around molecular orbitals with the same energy. In this case, each orbital is at a
different energy, so parentheses separate each orbital. Thus we would expect a diatomic molecule or ion containing seven electrons
(such as Be ) would have the molecular electron configuration (σ ) (σ ) (σ ) (σ ) . It is common to omit the core electrons
+
2 1s
2 ∗
1s
2
2s
2 ∗
2s
1

from molecular orbital diagrams and configurations and include only the valence electrons.

8.4.2: Bond Order

The filled molecular orbital diagram shows the number of electrons in both bonding and antibonding molecular orbitals. The net
contribution of the electrons to the bond strength of a molecule is identified by determining the bond order that results from the
filling of the molecular orbitals by electrons.
When using Lewis structures to describe the distribution of electrons in molecules, we define bond order as the number of bonding
pairs of electrons between two atoms. Thus a single bond has a bond order of 1, a double bond has a bond order of 2, and a triple
bond has a bond order of 3. We define bond order differently when we use the molecular orbital description of the distribution of
electrons, but the resulting bond order is usually the same. The MO technique is more accurate and can handle cases when the
Lewis structure method fails, but both methods describe the same phenomenon.
In the molecular orbital model, an electron contributes to a bonding interaction if it occupies a bonding orbital and it contributes to
an antibonding interaction if it occupies an antibonding orbital. The bond order is calculated by subtracting the destabilizing

Access for free at OpenStax 8.4.7 https://chem.libretexts.org/@go/page/38195

(antibonding) electrons from the stabilizing (bonding) electrons. Since a bond consists of two electrons, we divide by two to get the
bond order. We can determine bond order with the following equation:
(number of bonding electrons) − (number of antibonding electrons)
bond order =
2

The order of a covalent bond is a guide to its strength; a bond between two given atoms becomes stronger as the bond order
increases. If the distribution of electrons in the molecular orbitals between two atoms is such that the resulting bond would have a
bond order of zero, a stable bond does not form. We next look at some specific examples of MO diagrams and bond orders.

8.4.3: Bonding in Diatomic Molecules

A dihydrogen molecule (H2) forms from two hydrogen atoms. When the atomic orbitals of the two atoms combine, the electrons
occupy the molecular orbital of lowest energy, the σ1s bonding orbital. A dihydrogen molecule, H2, readily forms because the
energy of a H2 molecule is lower than that of two H atoms. The σ1s orbital that contains both electrons is lower in energy than
either of the two 1s atomic orbitals.
A molecular orbital can hold two electrons, so both electrons in the H2 molecule are in the σ1s bonding orbital; the electron
configuration is (σ ) . We represent this configuration by a molecular orbital energy diagram (Figure 8.4.8) in which a single
1s
2

upward arrow indicates one electron in an orbital, and two (upward and downward) arrows indicate two electrons of opposite spin.

Figure 8.4.8 : The molecular orbital energy diagram predicts that H2 will be a stable molecule with lower energy than the separated
atoms.
A diagram is shown that has an upward-facing vertical arrow running along the left side labeled “E.” At the bottom center of the
diagram is a horizontal line labeled, “sigma subscript 1 s,” that has two vertical half arrows drawn on it, one facing up and one
facing down. This line is connected to the right and left by upward-facing, dotted lines to two more horizontal lines, each labeled,
“1 s,” and each with one vertical half-arrow facing up drawn on it. These two lines are connected by upward-facing dotted lines to
another line in the center of the diagram, but farther up from the first, and labeled, “sigma subscript 1 s superscript asterisk.” The
left and right sides of the diagram have headers that read, ”Atomic orbitals,” while the center header reads, “Molecular orbitals.”
The bottom left and right are labeled “H” while the center is labeled “H subscript 2.”
A dihydrogen molecule contains two bonding electrons and no antibonding electrons so we have
(2 − 0)
bond order in H = =1
2
2

Because the bond order for the H–H bond is equal to 1, the bond is a single bond.
A helium atom has two electrons, both of which are in its 1s orbital. Two helium atoms do not combine to form a dihelium
molecule, He2, with four electrons, because the stabilizing effect of the two electrons in the lower-energy bonding orbital would be
offset by the destabilizing effect of the two electrons in the higher-energy antibonding molecular orbital. We would write the
hypothetical electron configuration of He2 as (σ ) (σ ) as in Figure 8.4.9. The net energy change would be zero, so there is no
1s
2 ∗
1s
2

driving force for helium atoms to form the diatomic molecule. In fact, helium exists as discrete atoms rather than as diatomic
molecules. The bond order in a hypothetical dihelium molecule would be zero.
(2 − 2)
bond order in He = =0
2
2

A bond order of zero indicates that no bond is formed between two atoms.

Access for free at OpenStax 8.4.8 https://chem.libretexts.org/@go/page/38195

 Figure 8.4.9 : The molecular orbital energy diagram predicts that He2 will not be a stable molecule, since it has equal numbers of
bonding and antibonding electrons.
A diagram is shown that has an upward-facing vertical arrow running along the left side labeled, “E.” At the bottom center of the
diagram is a horizontal line labeled, “sigma subscript 1 s,” that has two vertical half arrows drawn on it, one facing up and one
facing down. This line is connected to the right and left by upward-facing, dotted lines to two more horizontal lines, each labeled,
“1 s,” and each with one vertical half-arrow facing up and one facing down drawn on it. These two lines are connected by upward-
facing dotted lines to another line in the center of the diagram, but farther up from the first, and labeled, “sigma subscript 1 s
superscript asterisk.” This line has one upward-facing and one downward-facing vertical arrow drawn on it. The left and right sides
of the diagram have headers that read, “Atomic orbitals,” while the center header reads, “Molecular orbitals.” The bottom left and
right are labeled, “H e,” while the center is labeled, “H e subscript 2.”

8.4.4: The Diatomic Molecules of the Second Period

Eight possible homonuclear diatomic molecules might be formed by the atoms of the second period of the periodic table: Li2, Be2,
B2, C2, N2, O2, F2, and Ne2. However, we can predict that the Be2 molecule and the Ne2 molecule would not be stable. We can see
this by a consideration of the molecular electron configurations (Table 8.4.1).
Table 8.4.1 : Electron Configuration and Bond Order for Molecular Orbitals in Homonuclear Diatomic Molecules of Period Two Elements
Molecule Electron Configuration Bond Order

Li2 2
(σ2s ) 1

Be2 (unstable) 2
(σ2s ) (σ
∗
2s
)
2
0

B2 2
(σ2s ) (σ
∗
2s
2
) (π2py , π2pz )
2
1

C2 2
(σ2s ) (σ
∗
2s
2
) (π2py , π2pz )
4
2

N2 2
(σ2s ) (σ
∗
2s
2 4 2
) (π2py , π2pz ) (σ2px ) 3

O2 2
(σ2s ) (σ
∗
2s
2 2 4
) (σ2px ) (π2py , π2pz ) (π
∗
2py
,π
∗
2pz
)
2
2

F2 2
(σ2s ) (σ
∗
2s
2 2 4
) (σ2px ) (π2py , π2pz ) (π
∗
2py
, π
∗
2pz
)
4
1

Ne2 (unstable) 2
(σ2s ) (σ
∗
2s
2 2 4
) (σ2px ) (π2py , π2pz ) (π
∗
2py
,π
∗
2pz
4
) (σ
∗
2px
2
) 0

We predict valence molecular orbital electron configurations just as we predict electron configurations of atoms. Valence electrons
are assigned to valence molecular orbitals with the lowest possible energies. Consistent with Hund’s rule, whenever there are two
or more degenerate molecular orbitals, electrons fill each orbital of that type singly before any pairing of electrons takes place.

Access for free at OpenStax 8.4.9 https://chem.libretexts.org/@go/page/38195

 Figure 8.4.10 : This shows the MO diagrams for each homonuclear diatomic molecule in the second period. The orbital energies
decrease across the period as the effective nuclear charge increases and atomic radius decreases. Between N2 and O2, the order of
the orbitals changes.
A graph is shown in which the y-axis is labeled, “E,” and appears as a vertical, upward-facing arrow. Across the top, the graph
reads, “L i subscript 2,” “B e subscript 2,” “B subscript 2,” “C subscript 2,” “N subscript 2,” “O subscript 2,” “F subscript 2,” and
“Ne subscript 2.” Directly below each of these element terms is a single pink line, and all lines are connected to one another by a
dashed line, to create an overall line that decreases in height as it moves from left to right across the graph. This line is labeled,
“sigma subscript 2 p x superscript asterisk”. Directly below each of these lines is a set of two pink lines, and all lines are connected
to one another by a dashed line, to create an overall line that decreases in height as it moves from left to right across the graph. It is
consistently lower than the first line. This line is labeled, “pi subscript 2 p y superscript asterisk,” and, “pi subscript 2 p z
superscript asterisk.” Directly below each of these double lines is a single pink line, and all lines are connected to one another by a
dashed line, to create an overall line that decreases in height as it moves from left to right across the graph. It has a distinctive drop
at the label, “O subscript 2.” This line is labeled, “sigma subscript 2 p x.” Directly below each of these lines is a set of two pink
lines, and all lines are connected to one another by a dashed line to create an overall line that decreases very slightly in height as it
moves from left to right across the graph. It is consistently lower than the third line until it reaches the point labeled, “O subscript
2.” This line is labeled, “pi subscript 2 p y,” and, “pi subscript 2 p z.” Directly below each of these lines is a single blue line, and all
lines are connected to one another by a dashed line to create an overall line that decreases in height as it moves from left to right
across the graph. This line is labeled, “sigma subscript 2 s superscript asterisk.” Finally, directly below each of these lines is a
single blue line, and all lines are connected to one another by a dashed line to create an overall line that decreases in height as it
moves from left to right across the graph. This line is labeled. “sigma subscript 2 s.”

As we saw in valence bond theory, σ bonds are generally more stable than π bonds formed from degenerate atomic orbitals.
Similarly, in molecular orbital theory, σ orbitals are usually more stable than π orbitals. However, this is not always the case. The
MOs for the valence orbitals of the second period are shown in Figure 8.4.10. Looking at Ne2 molecular orbitals, we see that the
order is consistent with the generic diagram shown in the previous section. However, for atoms with three or fewer electrons in the
p orbitals (Li through N) we observe a different pattern, in which the σp orbital is higher in energy than the πp set. Obtain the
molecular orbital diagram for a homonuclear diatomic ion by adding or subtracting electrons from the diagram for the neutral
molecule.
This switch in orbital ordering occurs because of a phenomenon called s-p mixing. s-p mixing does not create new orbitals; it
merely influences the energies of the existing molecular orbitals. The σs wavefunction mathematically combines with the σp
wavefunction, with the result that the σs orbital becomes more stable, and the σp orbital becomes less stable (Figure 8.4.11).
Similarly, the antibonding orbitals also undergo s-p mixing, with the σs* becoming more stable and the σp* becoming less stable.

Access for free at OpenStax 8.4.10 https://chem.libretexts.org/@go/page/38195

 Figure 8.4.11 : Without mixing, the MO pattern occurs as expected, with the σp orbital lower in energy than the σp orbitals. When s-
p mixing occurs, the orbitals shift as shown, with the σp orbital higher in energy than the πp orbitals.
A diagram is shown. At the bottom left of the diagram is a horizontal line that is connected to the right and left by upward-facing,
dotted lines to two more horizontal lines. Those two lines are connected by upward-facing dotted lines to another line in the center
of the diagram but farther up from the first. Each of the bottom two central lines has a vertical downward-facing arrow. Above this
structure is a horizontal line that is connected to the right and left by upward-facing, dotted lines to two sets of three horizontal
lines and those two lines are connected by upward-facing dotted lines to another line in the center of the diagram, but further up
from the first. In between the horizontal lines of this structure are two pairs of horizontal lines that are above the first line but below
the second and connected by dotted lines to the side horizontal lines. The bottom and top central lines each have an upward-facing
vertical arrow. These two structures are redrawn on the right side of the diagram, but this time, the central lines of the bottom
structure are moved downward in relation to the side lines. The upper portion of the structure has its central lines shifted upward in
relation to the side lines. This structure also shows the bottom line appearing above the set of two lines.
s-p mixing occurs when the s and p orbitals have similar energies. The energy difference between 2s and 2p orbitals in O, F, and Ne
is greater than that in Li, Be, B, C, and N. Because of this, O2, F2, and Ne exhibit negligible s-p mixing (not sufficient to change the
energy ordering), and their MO diagrams follow the normal pattern, as shown in Figure 8.4.7. All of the other period 2 diatomic
molecules do have s-p mixing, which leads to the pattern where the σp orbital is raised above the πp set.
Using the MO diagrams shown in Figure 8.4.11, we can add in the electrons and determine the molecular electron configuration
and bond order for each of the diatomic molecules. As shown in Table 8.4.1, Be2 and Ne2 molecules would have a bond order of 0,
and these molecules do not exist.
The combination of two lithium atoms to form a lithium molecule, Li2, is analogous to the formation of H2, but the atomic orbitals
involved are the valence 2s orbitals. Each of the two lithium atoms has one valence electron. Hence, we have two valence electrons
available for the σ2s bonding molecular orbital. Because both valence electrons would be in a bonding orbital, we would predict the
Li2 molecule to be stable. The molecule is, in fact, present in an appreciable concentration in lithium vapor at temperatures near the
boiling point of the element. All of the other molecules in Table 8.4.1 with a bond order greater than zero are also known.
The O2 molecule has enough electrons to half fill the (π , π ) level. We expect the two electrons that occupy these two
∗
2py
∗
2pz

degenerate orbitals to be unpaired, and this molecular electronic configuration for O2 is in accord with the fact that the oxygen
molecule has two unpaired electrons ( Figure 8.4.10). The presence of two unpaired electrons has proved to be difficult to explain
using Lewis structures, but the molecular orbital theory explains it quite well. In fact, the unpaired electrons of the oxygen
molecule provide a strong piece of support for the molecular orbital theory.

 Application: Band Theory in Extended Systems

When two identical atomic orbitals on different atoms combine, two molecular orbitals result (e.g., H in Figure 8.4.8). The
2

bonding orbital is lower in energy than the original atomic orbitals because the atomic orbitals are in-phase in the molecular
orbital. The antibonding orbital is higher in energy than the original atomic orbitals because the atomic orbitals are out-of-
phase.

Access for free at OpenStax 8.4.11 https://chem.libretexts.org/@go/page/38195

In a solid, similar things happen, but on a much larger scale. Remember that even in a small sample there are a huge number of
atoms (typically > 1023 atoms), and therefore a huge number of atomic orbitals that may be combined into molecular orbitals.
When N valence atomic orbitals, all of the same energy and each containing one (1) electron, are combined, N/2 (filled)
bonding orbitals and N/2 (empty) antibonding orbitals will result. Each bonding orbital will show an energy lowering as the
atomic orbitals are mostly in-phase, but each of the bonding orbitals will be a little different and have slightly different
energies. The antibonding orbitals will show an increase in energy as the atomic orbitals are mostly out-of-phase, but each of
the antibonding orbitals will also be a little different and have slightly different energies. The allowed energy levels for all the
bonding orbitals are so close together that they form a band, called the valence band. Likewise, all the antibonding orbitals are
very close together and form a band, called the conduction band. Figure 8.4.12) shows the bands for three important classes of
materials: insulators, semiconductors, and conductors.

Figure 8.4.12 : Molecular orbitals in solids are so closely spaced that they are described as bands. The valence band is lower in
energy and the conduction band is higher in energy. The type of solid is determined by the size of the “band gap” between the
valence and conduction bands. Only a very small amount of energy is required to move electrons from the valence band to the
conduction band in a conductor, and so they conduct electricity well. In an insulator, the band gap is large, so that very few
electrons move, and they are poor conductors of electricity. Semiconductors are in between: they conduct electricity better than
insulators, but not as well as conductors.
This figure shows three diagrams. The first is labeled, “Insulator,” and it consists of two boxes. The “conduction” box is above
and the “valence” box is below. A large gap marked by 4 dashed lines contains a double-headed arrow. One head pointing
towards the “conduction box” and the other towards the “valence” box. The arrow is labeled, “Band gap.” The second diagram
is similar to the first, but the band gap is about half as large. This diagram is labeled, “Semiconductor.” The third diagram is
similar to the other two, but the band gap is about a fifth that of the “Semiconductor” diagram. This diagram is labeled,
“Conductor.”
In order to conduct electricity, electrons must move from the filled valence band to the empty conduction band where they can
move throughout the solid. The size of the band gap, or the energy difference between the top of the valence band and the
bottom of the conduction band, determines how easy it is to move electrons between the bands. Only a small amount of energy
is required in a conductor because the band gap is very small. This small energy difference is “easy” to overcome, so they are
good conductors of electricity. In an insulator, the band gap is so “large” that very few electrons move into the conduction
band; as a result, insulators are poor conductors of electricity. Semiconductors conduct electricity when “moderate” amounts of
energy are provided to move electrons out of the valence band and into the conduction band. Semiconductors, such as silicon,
are found in many electronics.
Semiconductors are used in devices such as computers, smartphones, and solar cells. Solar cells produce electricity when light
provides the energy to move electrons out of the valence band. The electricity that is generated may then be used to power a
light or tool, or it can be stored for later use by charging a battery. As of December 2014, up to 46% of the energy in sunlight
could be converted into electricity using solar cells.

 Example 8.4.2: Molecular Orbital Diagrams, Bond Order, and Number of Unpaired Electrons

Draw the molecular orbital diagram for the oxygen molecule, O2. From this diagram, calculate the bond order for O2. How
does this diagram account for the paramagnetism of O2?

Solution

Access for free at OpenStax 8.4.12 https://chem.libretexts.org/@go/page/38195

We draw a molecular orbital energy diagram similar to that shown in Figure 8.4.7. Each oxygen atom contributes six electrons,
so the diagram appears as shown in Figure 8.4.7.

Figure 8.4.13 : The molecular orbital energy diagram for O2 predicts two unpaired electrons.
We calculate the bond order as
(8 − 4)
O = =2
2
2

Oxygen's paramagnetism is explained by the presence of two unpaired electrons in the (π2py, π2pz)* molecular orbitals.

 Exercise 8.4.2

The main component of air is N2. From the molecular orbital diagram of N2, predict its bond order and whether it is
diamagnetic or paramagnetic.

Answer
N2 has a bond order of 3 and is diamagnetic.

 Example 8.4.3: Ion Predictions with MO Diagrams

Give the molecular orbital configuration for the valence electrons in C 2−

2
. Will this ion be stable?

Solution
Looking at the appropriate MO diagram, we see that the π orbitals are lower in energy than the σp orbital. The valence electron
configuration for C2 is
2
(σ2s ) (σ
∗
2s
2
) (π2py , π2pz )
4
.
Adding two more electrons to generate the C 2−
2
anion will give a valence electron configuration of
2 ∗ 2 4 2
(σ2s ) (σ ) (π2py , π2pz ) (σ2px )
2s

Since this has six more bonding electrons than antibonding, the bond order will be 3, and the ion should be stable.

Access for free at OpenStax 8.4.13 https://chem.libretexts.org/@go/page/38195

  Exercise 8.4.3

How many unpaired electrons would be present on a Be 2−

2
ion? Would it be paramagnetic or diamagnetic?

Answer
two, paramagnetic

8.4.5: Key Concepts and Summary

Molecular orbital (MO) theory describes the behavior of electrons in a molecule in terms of combinations of the atomic wave
functions. The resulting molecular orbitals may extend over all the atoms in the molecule. Bonding molecular orbitals are formed
by in-phase combinations of atomic wave functions, and electrons in these orbitals stabilize a molecule. Antibonding molecular
orbitals result from out-of-phase combinations of atomic wave functions and electrons in these orbitals make a molecule less stable.
Molecular orbitals located along an internuclear axis are called σ MOs. They can be formed from s orbitals or from p orbitals
oriented in an end-to-end fashion. Molecular orbitals formed from p orbitals oriented in a side-by-side fashion have electron
density on opposite sides of the internuclear axis and are called π orbitals.
We can describe the electronic structure of diatomic molecules by applying molecular orbital theory to the valence electrons of the
atoms. Electrons fill molecular orbitals following the same rules that apply to filling atomic orbitals; Hund’s rule and the Aufbau
principle tell us that lower-energy orbitals will fill first, electrons will spread out before they pair up, and each orbital can hold a
maximum of two electrons with opposite spins. Materials with unpaired electrons are paramagnetic and attracted to a magnetic
field, while those with all-paired electrons are diamagnetic and repelled by a magnetic field. Correctly predicting the magnetic
properties of molecules is in advantage of molecular orbital theory over Lewis structures and valence bond theory.

This page titled 8.4: Molecular Orbital Theory is shared under a CC BY 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by OpenStax via
source content that was edited to the style and standards of the LibreTexts platform; a detailed edit history is available upon request.

Access for free at OpenStax 8.4.14 https://chem.libretexts.org/@go/page/38195