When it comes to academic writing, one of the most challenging tasks is crafting a literature review.

This critical component of research papers and dissertations requires a comprehensive understanding
of existing literature related to the topic at hand. However, delving into the vast sea of scholarly
articles, books, and other resources can be daunting and time-consuming.

Writing a literature review involves not only summarizing the findings of various studies but also
critically analyzing and synthesizing them to provide a coherent narrative that contributes to the
understanding of the research question or topic. It requires meticulous attention to detail, strong
analytical skills, and the ability to identify relevant sources.

One of the primary difficulties in writing a literature review is ensuring that it is comprehensive yet
focused. With an abundance of information available, it's easy to get overwhelmed and lose sight of
the main objectives of the review. Additionally, synthesizing diverse perspectives and findings into a
cohesive argument requires careful planning and organization.

Moreover, maintaining objectivity while evaluating existing literature can be challenging, especially
when dealing with controversial or conflicting research findings. It's crucial to critically assess the
quality and reliability of sources to avoid bias and ensure the credibility of the literature review.

Given the complexities involved, many students and researchers seek assistance with writing their
literature reviews. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers professional writing services tailored to meet the
specific needs of clients. With a team of experienced writers well-versed in academic research and
writing, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ can help you craft a literature review that meets the highest standards
of quality and rigor.

By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can save time and effort while
ensuring that your work is thorough, well-organized, and expertly crafted. Whether you're struggling
to get started or need assistance with refining your existing review, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ is your
trusted partner in academic writing success.
There are 10 key principles based on which this collaboration functions 12. Exposure and outcome
are determined simultaneously. For more information on the HaPI database, please click here. In
other words, was the intended outcome of the treatment was achieved in that particular patient in a
given clinical situation or not. MEDLINE covers over 4,800 journals published in the United States
and 70 other countries. When commencing a literature review, a good place to start is by finding out
whether any systematic reviews have been conducted on your topic. Determining Sample Size for a
Cohort Comparison Study 42. The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine.
Published 2022. LibGuides: Evidence-Based Practice for Health Professionals: Levels of Evidence.
Libguides.nvcc.edu. Updated 2022. Other research works included in level 2 evidence are
prospective comparative study and retrospective study. Level 1 evidence might include systematic
reviews of homogenous randomized controlled trials, for example, or simply a single high quality
RCT. The scientific method demands retesting, even when favorable results occur. Nursing
Education in Video Back File This link opens in a new window Online video collection to more than
400 titles. more. less. Nursing Education in Video is a unique online collection of videos created
specifically for the education and training of nurses, nursing assistants, and other healthcare workers.
Thus, in continuation of informing the readers of the knowledge that exists, enlightens the readers of
the gaps that exist in the knowledge while emphasizing the specific gap that forms the nucleus of the
research. Once the search results have been obtained, one should have the skill to evaluate the
evidence found. DAILYMED Searchable drug information by name NDC code, drug class or Set
ID. Dr. Abdul- Monim Batiha Assistant Professor Critical Care Nursing Philadelphia university.
Additionally, organizations and journals have adopted variations in the levels of evidence to
accommodate their differing specialties. 1. With the help of these filters, we can combine the tested
MeSH terms and text words related to the study design and methodology. Our current best-in-class
and best-in-concept (unmanned) technology would allow us to travel one light-year in about 18,449
years, or about 258,286 years to the closest inhabitable planet and about 18.5 million years to the
average inhabitable one. Together the articles show a successful attempt to increase collaboration and
some pitfalls to avoid. When drafting a systematic review, authors are expected to deliver a critical
assessment and evaluation of all this literature rather than a simple list. These RCTs are associated
with low study errors (low P-value, confidence interval which excludes 1, or a ”negative” result
associated with a power of over 80%). The criteria for ranking evidence is based on the design,
methodology, validity and applicability of the different types of studies. Animal studies also test
how safe and effective new treatments are before they are tested in people.(NCI Dictionary of
Cancer Terms). Risk factors in periodontology: a conceptual framework. It is still very poor
evidence, but it is certainly better than mere anecdote. These trials compare the outcome of those in
the treatment group to those who receive no treatment and the treatment allocation in these trials is
random in nature. Jorge Ramirez Levels of evidence: Nursing 143 Levels of evidence: Nursing 143
Kathleen Byrne Heidecker Systematic review Systematic review Aboubakr Elnashar Database
searching jan 2015 Database searching jan 2015 wendy0315 Database Searching Basics Database
Searching Basics zhang48 Smile architect Smile architect Indian dental academy MLA CE: The
Diversity of Data Management: Practical Approaches Recorded Webca. These are the questions
which directly affect clinical decision making.
By organizing a well-defined hierarchy of evidence, academia experts were aiming to help scientists
feel confident in using findings from high-ranked evidence in their own work or practice. Can the
results be extrapolated to other populations. These include systematic reviews, meta-analysis and
evidence-based article reviews. Use this QRG for instructions on how to register for an account,
download the mobile app, and log in to the mobile app using OpenAthens. In case-series, the
researcher reports on how a series of patients respond to a given intervention. This can occur when
the study and control groups are chosen so that they differ from each other by one or more factors
that may affect the outcome of the study. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and
Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 Statement Provides a 17-item checklist to facilitate the
preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review. With an understanding of
how to effectively use EBDM, practitioners can quickly and conveniently stay current with scientific
findings on topics that are important to them and their patients. The use of statistical techniques in a
systematic review. The scientific method demands retesting, even when favorable results occur.
Standard 2: The recreational therapist plans and develops an individualized treatment plan that
identifies goals and evidence-based treatment intervention strategies. The average planet is about a
1000 light-years away. It not only helps the clinicians to be confident about the treatment they are
rendering to their patients but also helps the patients who are ultimately benefited from the
treatment. The answers to these questions tell us whether the results of the study are trustworthy and
what is the expected outcome with the patient under treatment. It brings together a range of
practice-oriented research activities to improve the effectiveness of nursing practice and health care
outcomes. Systematic review of published literature (databases) 2.Basic review of grey literature
(web) 3. Note that Randomized Controlled Trials are the highest level of evidence in single trials.
Geared toward nurses, nurse administrators, nursing students, and nursing faculty, Nursing
Reference Center Plus provides access to nursing care plans, nurse management and leadership
topics, regulator and risk management topics, nursing skills checklists, video demonstrations of
nursing practices, patient education handouts, and continuing education credits. Using Webulator
Applications to Compute Sample Size 1. Computing the Pearson Product Moment Correlation
Coefficient Defining the Correlation Coefficient for Continuous Data: the Pearson Product Moment
Correlation Coefficient 36. All this, with unlimited rounds of language review and full support at
every step of the way. Clinical practice guidelines also examine the quality of the evidence and
interpret it in order to provide clear recommendations for practice (and often, research and policy as
well). Journal of Patient Safety, 5(3), 180-183. Stone, P. W. (2002). Popping the PICO question in
research and evidence-based practice. References Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
(n.d.). Medical teamwork and patient safety. Thus, it becomes an extensive database for biomedical
research. In the published literature, this is a case report. Brand name product ingredients provided.
more. less. The Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database provides the most comprehensive listing
of brand name product ingredients available giving a summary of safety, effectiveness, drug
interactions, and adverse effects. Then we evaluate the reliability of these publications and compile
the available data in a quantitative (meta-analysis) or qualitative manner. These are at the very top
because they are created by a team or panel of experts using a very rigorous process and include a
variety of evidence ranging from quantitative and qualitative research studies, white papers and grey
literature. Co-intervention is a serious problem when double blinding is absent or when the use of
very effective non-study treatments is permitted.
DAILYMED Searchable drug information by name NDC code, drug class or Set ID. Use the
instructions in the guide below to register for an account. Quality of RCTs in periodontology—a
systematic review. Evidence-based Periodontology is an effective tool to support our decision
making in clinical practice. This kind of research is key to learning about a treatment’s effectiveness.
Acute care is usually given in a hospital by specialized personnel using complex and sophisticated
technical equipment and materials, and it may involve intensive or emergency care. Combining the
Evidence with Nursing Experience and Patient Preferences 5. These are the questions which directly
affect clinical decision making. It indicates to what extent the results of the research may be biased
and is thus a comment on the degree to which alternative explanations for the outcome found are
possible. Evidence live 2015 -hierarchical levels of evidence based medicine are incor. As a result, all
the articles which have stomatitis as a major concept in the paper will appear in the results of the
search. This includes demographic information (for example, age, gender, ethnic origin) and
information on diagnosis, treatment, response to treatment, and follow-up after treatment. (OCEBM
Table of Evidence Glossary). Except where otherwise noted, this work is subject to a Creative
Commons Attribution 4.0 license. Details and exceptions. Drug Information Portal (U.S. National
Library of Medicine) Portal to current drug information for over 50,000 drugs. more. less. Gateway
to selected drug information from the National Library of Medicine and other key government
agencies. For example, a randomized controlled trial or a cohort study. Health and Safety Science
Abstracts This link opens in a new window Public health safety and industrial hygiene. more. less.
This database provides a comprehensive, timely survey of recent work relating to public health,
safety, and industrial hygiene. The purpose of a protocol is to outline your systematic review process
in a clear and transparent manner to reviewers and readers. Access practical steps to create and then
evaluate your work. More than 813,500 citations were added to MEDLINE in 2017. The t-test for
Independent Sample Means and Pooled Versus Unpooled Variance 31. Recent surveys reveal that
nearly half of Americans believe in UFOs, and I suspect that nearly half of Obstetricians are using
magnesium. The problem, of course, is the conclusions drawn from the evidence. These trials
compare the outcome of those in the treatment group to those who receive no treatment and the
treatment allocation in these trials is random in nature. The sub-questions in the table help us to
decide whether the available evidence is sufficient to be applied in the practice. In interventional
studies, a single patient is subjected to a particular treatment and the results are reported. All rights
are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
December 6, 2004. Importance of Conference Proceedings as Grey Literature. Risk factors in
periodontology: a conceptual framework. Published 2022. LibGuides: Evidence-Based Practice for
Health Professionals: Levels of Evidence. Libguides.nvcc.edu. Updated 2022. Over 1,100 profiles of
natural ingredients are included as well as Canadian licensed natural health products and herbal fixed
combination products.
Our current best-in-class and best-in-concept (unmanned) technology would allow us to travel one
light-year in about 18,449 years, or about 258,286 years to the closest inhabitable planet and about
18.5 million years to the average inhabitable one. Reports of case series usually contain detailed
information about the individual patients. Hence, it should never replace the traditional decision-
making procedures, but just acts as an adjunct. Then, you read the responses and you decide which
observation was a UFO and which was a normal event explained by man-made or meteorologic
phenomena; in this case, you are biased. Cook, D. J. et. al. Ann Intern Med 1997;126:376-38021.
But how many meta-analyses of multiple RCTs with homogenous results have you read. For
example, a researcher notices that there seems to be more aluminum deposits in certain parts of the
brain in children with autism. Measures of Central Tendency PART 1: Measures of Central Tendency
27. Use the simulator below to check the price for your manuscript, using the total number of words
in the document. PsycINFO (via ProQuest) This link opens in a new window Primary database for
international literature in psychology and related disciplines. more. less. PsycINFO provides access
to international literature in psychology and related disciplines. Specifically speaking about
Periodontology, every year, thousands of articles are published in various research journals. The
foreground questions are specific knowledge questions. Animal studies also test how safe and
effective new treatments are before they are tested in people.(NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms).
Second, most meta-analyses are performed simply because the studies in the field contain
heterogeneous results; this creates methodological nightmares and tells us immediately that the
results of any one or more of the given studies definitely wrong. Except where otherwise noted, this
work is subject to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. Details and exceptions. To many
antivaxers, this is high-quality evidence from the basic sciences. These are the questions which
directly affect clinical decision making. Following is a set of questions that can be applied to
evaluate a study. Searching through the literature for relevant sources; Evaluating the findings from
your search; Synthesizing these findings; and Presenting the results. Literature searching Key
Sources Books Journal Articles and Databases Grey Literature Theses. Focusing once more on the
healthcare and medical field, see how different study designs fit into particular questions, that are not
necessarily located at the tip of the pyramid. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data
mining, AI training, and similar technologies. Whenever possible, this type of evidence should be
used to inform decisions about health policy and practice (rather than that from a single study).
Normally, they function as an overview of clinical trials. New information in the form of research
findings will be incorporated constantly and knowledgeably into nursing practice Requires
integration of best research with clinical expertise and the patient’s unique values and circumstances.
Definition: “the practice of nursing in which the nurse makes clinical decisions on the basis of the
best available, current research evidence, their own clinical expertise, and the needs and preferences
of the patient”. In simple words, we can say that a systematic review is a multistage process where
firstly, we identify all available and reliable publications regarding a specific problem. The primary
function of Cochrane collaboration is to disseminate member-produced systematic reviews of
healthcare interventions through updates of The Cochrane Library. Determining Sample Size for a
Case-Control Study 4. While PRCTs don’t provide the same degree of control and standardization as
an RCT, the idea is that they provide more realistic evidence about how effective an intervention will
be in real life.