Crafting a comprehensive literature review for a quantitative study can be an arduous task,

demanding time, effort, and meticulous attention to detail. It involves a thorough examination of
existing scholarly works, synthesizing relevant information, and critically analyzing findings to
provide a solid foundation for the research at hand. From identifying key concepts and theories to
evaluating methodologies and interpreting results, every step requires careful consideration to ensure
accuracy and credibility.

One of the primary challenges in writing a literature review lies in navigating the vast sea of
academic literature. With an abundance of scholarly articles, journals, books, and other sources
available, sifting through them to find the most relevant and reliable ones can be overwhelming.
Additionally, assessing the quality and validity of each source is crucial to maintaining the integrity
of the review.

Furthermore, synthesizing diverse perspectives and conflicting findings from various sources while
maintaining coherence and clarity is no small feat. It requires a skillful blend of summarization,
analysis, and integration to present a cohesive narrative that contributes meaningfully to the research
question.

Given the complexities involved, many researchers find themselves in need of professional assistance
to tackle literature reviews effectively. That's where ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ comes in. With a team of
experienced writers well-versed in academic writing and research methodologies, we offer
specialized assistance tailored to your specific needs.

By entrusting your literature review to our experts, you can rest assured that your work will be in
capable hands. We understand the intricacies of crafting a literature review for a quantitative study
and are committed to delivering high-quality, meticulously researched content that meets your
requirements and exceeds your expectations.

Don't let the challenges of writing a literature review hinder your research progress. Order from ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ today and take the first step towards a well-crafted and impactful literature review
that sets the stage for your quantitative study's success.
These authors reviewed the existing literature on personal health record ( phr ) systems including
design, functionality, implementation, applications, outcomes, and benefits. Select the databases you
will use to conduct your searches. What are the key concepts and how are they defined. What
nutrients do foods contain and what do we need. Keep careful notes so that you may track your
thought processes during the research process. The most common quantitative approach is a meta-
analysis, which allows you to combine results from multiple studies into a summary result. When you
have multiple sources cited in a paragraph, you are more likely to be synthesizing them (not always,
but often Read more about synthesis here. The introduction should clearly establish the focus and
purpose of the literature review. Remember a comprehensive literature review is, at its most
fundamental level, an original work based on an extensive critical examination and synthesis of the
relevant literature on a topic. Use the bibliographies and references of research studies you find to
locate others. It also provides examples of published reviews and useful resources for researchers
who want to undertake this type of review. When searching some databases, and Google, the
operator AND may be implied. Important to various business and market functions, research also
allows for companies to acquire a competitive edge over their key competitors. They provide
historical context for a field while offering opinions on its future trajectory. No additional database
limiters were set to further narrow search returns. Transparent and reproducible in reporting details of
time frame, search and methods to minimize bias. You also have the option to opt-out of these
cookies. Gray literature: Gray literature includes documents produced by governments, universities,
and other institutions that aren’t published by traditional publishers. You always want to be a step
ahead of your competitor(s) when doing business. Usually you will need to synthesize research
rather than just summarizing it. Much of the information used in an annotated bibliography can be
used also in a literature review, so you’ll be not only partially drafting your lit review as you
research, but also developing your sense of the larger conversation going on among scholars,
professionals, and any other stakeholders in your topic. Lit reviews can take many different
organizational patterns depending on what you are trying to accomplish with the review. However,
you should justify why a quantitative approach wasn’t possible. The only proofreading tool
specialized in correcting academic writing The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s
of academic texts and by native English editors. May require the author to adopt a guiding theory, a
set of competing models, or a point of view about a topic. Systematic reviews that involve the
rigorous application of scientific strategies aimed at limiting subjectivity and bias (i.e., systematic
and random errors) can respond to this challenge. Similarly, literature summary tables for articles
included in a meta-synthesis must include information about the participants’ characteristics,
research context and conceptual contribution of each reviewed article so as to help the reader make
an informed decision about the usefulness or lack of usefulness of the individual article in the review
and the whole review. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred.
Delineating each reviewed article’s conceptual contribution is particularly beneficial in qualitative
reviews, mixed-methods reviews, and critical reviews that often focus on developing models and
describing or explaining various phenomena. Here are some examples: Chronological: The simplest
approach is to trace the development of the topic over time, which helps familiarize the audience
with the topic (for instance if you are introducing something that is not commonly known in your
field).
How does the publication relate to other literature in the field. A definition from the Online
Dictionary for Library and Information Sciences. There is no preconceived plan to systematically
review all of the literature although this can be done. It’s important to note that not every systematic
review includes a meta-analysis but a meta-analysis can’t exist without a systematic review of the
literature. Purdue OWL: Writing a Literature Review The overview of literature reviews comes from
Purdue's Online Writing Lab. Undertaken to clarify the state of existing research, the evidence, and
possible implications that can be drawn from that. This material may not be published, reproduced,
broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. If documenting your research in a Google
Doc, consider linking the information to actual articles saved in drive. The introduction should
clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review. Evaluate sources. Identify themes,
debates and gaps. A literature review may be a stand alone work or the introduction to a larger
research paper, depending on the assignment. Their model follows the systematic data processing
approach comprised of three steps, namely: (a) literature search and screening; (b) data extraction and
analysis; and (c) writing the literature review. Make a list of keywords Start by creating a list of
keywords related to your research topic. When you find a useful book or article, you can check the
bibliography to find other relevant sources. You should be able to answer it based only on a review
of existing publications. Tip 3: write conceptual contribution of each reviewed article While reading
and evaluating review papers, we have observed that many review authors only provide core results
of the article included in a review and do not explain the conceptual contribution offered by the
included article. For example: Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative
research Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship
Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources Theoretical A literature review
is often the foundation for a theoretical framework. Importantly, narrative reviews can also be used
as educational articles to bring practitioners up to date with certain topics of issues ( Green et al.,
2006 ). Recently, there have been several efforts to introduce more rigour in narrative reviews that
will elucidate common pitfalls and bring changes into their publication standards. Discusses
published information in a particular subject area. She wishes to construct a narrowly-focused and
succinct literature review of thinkers who have donned a feminist lens to analyze Dewey’s
approaches to education, learning, and democracy and to employ Dewey’s works in theorizing on
gender and education and on gender in society. These cookies do not store any personally
identifiable information. You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar Literature
reviews are important resources for scientists. Creating them can provide inspiration for one’s own
research, as well as some practice in writing. Expand your journal search; a complete listing of
available AU Library and OhioLINK databases is available on the Databases A to Z list. In this case,
an independent variable is not manipulated, while the second (dependent) variable is manipulated to
determine the effect former on the latter. Try to analyze the patterns, turning points, and key debates
that have shaped the direction of the field. Your literature review should be guided by your central
research question. This is an important step because having a plan allows you to work more
efficiently and reduces bias. The review should aim to be both descriptive and evaluative. Boyle and
Tang read through the articles to decide if any more studies needed to be excluded based on the
selection criteria.
There are a number of different situations where you might write a literature review, each with
slightly different expectations; different disciplines, too, have field-specific expectations for what a
literature review is and does. Most databases include limiters, or additional parameters, you may use
to strategically focus search results. Finally, average impact scores increased over time with two
notable growth periods. Simply save any potentially relevant citations using bibliographic software,
such as Scribbr’s APA or MLA Generator. Chesapeake, VA: Watertree Press. Telsi, M. et al. (2013).
No evidence for association between bipolar disorder risk gene variants and brain structural
phenotypes. Merely noting the quality score based on standardised critical appraisal templates is not
adequate because the readers should be able to identify the reasons for assigning a weak or moderate
rating. Systematic reviews that involve the rigorous application of scientific strategies aimed at
limiting subjectivity and bias (i.e., systematic and random errors) can respond to this challenge.
Keywords can be combined using the Boolean operators, “and”, “or” and sometimes “not” to
narrow down or expand the search results. Conclusion: Summarize the key findings you have taken
from the literature and emphasize their significance Connect it back to your primary research
question How should I organize my lit review. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable
information. Is literature review a qualitative research method? - ResearchGate. In medicine, clinical
trial registries are another important type of gray literature. Video Capsule Enteroscopy in the
Diagnosis of Celiac Disease: A multicenter Study. Federal government websites often end in.gov
or.mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site. Themes:
what questions or concepts recur across the literature. Define the Columbian Exchange and explain
its causes and effects. An Introduction to Literature Reviews Dr. Eric Jensen, Professor of Sociology
at the University of Warwick, and Dr. Charles Laurie, Director of Research at Verisk Maplecroft,
explain how to write a literature review, and why researchers need to do so. Your literature review
should be guided by your central research question. We refer to conceptual contribution as a
description of how the article’s key results contribute towards the development of potential codes,
themes or subthemes, or emerging patterns that are reported as the review findings. Aims to identify
nature and extent of research; preliminary assessment of size and scope of available research on topic.
Most integrative reviews are intended to address mature topics or emerging topics. The literature
represents background and research developments related to a specific research question, interpreted
and analyzed by you in a synthesized way. Data is combined and re-analyzed, providing a greater
statistical power than any single study alone. Additionally, you may review the literature of different
disciplines to find deeper meaning and understanding of your topic. If you’re doing a systematic
review on your own (e.g., for a research paper or thesis ), you should take appropriate measures to
ensure the validity and reliability of your research. If your lit review is a standalone piece, the
introduction and conclusion take up more space and give you a place to discuss your goals, research
methods, and conclusions separately from where you discuss the literature itself. Aim of this review
has been to present the current state of knowledge about the impact of e-cigarette use on health,
with an emphasis on Central and Eastern Europe. It is used most for subjects such as political
science. Statistical analysis tools compared the demographics and clinical variables obtained from
participants through the analysis of variance (ANOVA), a statistical tool that analyses numerical data
obtained from a quantitative research. How? If limiting results to full-text only, you may miss an
important piece of research that could change the direction of your research.
She wishes to construct a narrowly-focused and succinct literature review of thinkers who have
donned a feminist lens to analyze Dewey’s approaches to education, learning, and democracy and to
employ Dewey’s works in theorizing on gender and education and on gender in society. Secondly,
data collection took place using more structured research instruments. Think carefully about how to
phrase your search terms and include multiple synonyms of each word. The purpose of this
descriptive or mapping review was to characterize publication trends in the medical informatics
literature over a 20-year period (1987 to 2006). Eczema is a common skin condition that causes red,
itchy skin. After this first exploration, you will conduct a deeper dive into the literature to learn
everything you can about the topic and its related issues. The process may be subject to bias that
supports the researcher’s own work. Their methods are transparent, so they can be scrutinized by
others. They minimize research bias by considering all available evidence and evaluating each study
for bias. In the final review, 64 research papers were included. Rely heavily on the guidelines your
instructor has given you. She also provides step-by-step guidance on writing a persuasive literature
review. Seven databases were searched from 1985 to March 2010. Literature Review - COMM 110-
Quantitative Research Methods. Walden University Writing Center: Literature Review Matrix Find
a variety of literature review matrix examples and templates from Walden University. Four inclusion
and three exclusion criteria were utilized during the screening process. Download Word doc
Download Google doc Before you begin searching for literature, you need a clearly defined topic.
It’s very important to keep a meticulous record of why you included or excluded each article. This
guide describes how to plan, conduct, organize, and present a systematic review of quantitative
(meta-analysis) or qualitative (narrative review, meta-synthesis) information. A practical guide to data
analysis in general literature reviews Quantitative studies tend to contain a lot of statistical data, and
not all of it is relevant in a general literature review, especially at the undergraduate level.. One of the
biggest challenges in writing a literature review is to actually draw a conclusion, rather than to
merely list the results of many different studies. Omission of a literature review chapter or section in
a graduate-level project represents a serious void or absence of critical element in the research
process. How to write a superb literature review The best proposals are timely and clearly explain
why readers should pay attention to the proposed topic. The methods are repeatable, and the
approach is formal and systematic: Formulate a research question Develop a protocol Search for all
relevant studies Apply the selection criteria Extract the data Synthesize the data Write and publish a
report Although multiple sets of guidelines exist, the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews is
among the most widely used. Writing the literature review: A practical guide Available 3rd floor of
Perkins Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences
Available online. If you need to review a specific area on the video, view on YouTube and expand
the video description for access to topic time stamps. How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best
Practice Guide for Conducting and Systematic reviews are characterized by a methodical and
replicable methodology and presentation. At the graduate or doctoral level, the literature review is an
essential feature of thesis and dissertation, as well as grant proposal writing. For example, in the case
of narrative reviews, there is greater flexibility in searching and synthesizing articles ( Green et al.,
2006 ). Researchers are often relatively free to use a diversity of approaches to search, identify, and
select relevant scientific articles, describe their operational characteristics, present how the individual
studies fit together, and formulate conclusions. It’s a statistical analysis that combines the results of
two or more studies, usually to estimate an effect size. Tip 3: write conceptual contribution of each
reviewed article While reading and evaluating review papers, we have observed that many review
authors only provide core results of the article included in a review and do not explain the conceptual
contribution offered by the included article.