May 2022 U2 It MS
May 2022 U2 It MS
May 2022 U2 It MS
Summer 2022
Pearson Edexcel International Advanced
Subsidiary
In Information Technology (WIT12/ 01)
Unit 2
Edexcel and BTEC Qualifications
Edexcel and BTEC qualifications are awarded by Pearson, the UK’s largest awarding body. We
provide a wide range of qualifications including academic, vocational, occupational and specific
programmes for employers. For further information visit our qualifications websites at
www.edexcel.com or www.btec.co.uk. Alternatively, you can get in touch with us using the
details on our contact us page at www.edexcel.com/contactus.
Pearson aspires to be the world’s leading learning company. Our aim is to help everyone
progress in their lives through education. We believe in every kind of learning, for all kinds of
people, wherever they are in the world. We’ve been involved in education for over 150 years,
and by working across 70 countries, in 100 languages, we have built an international reputation
for our commitment to high standards and raising achievement through innovation in
education. Find out more about how we can help you and your students at:
www.pearson.com/uk
Summer 2022
Question Paper Log Number P71386A
Publications Code WIT12_01_2206_MS
All the material in this publication is copyright
© Pearson Education Ltd 2022
General Marking Guidance
• All candidates must receive the same treatment. Examiners must mark the first
candidate in exactly the same way as they mark the last.
• Mark schemes should be applied positively. Candidates must be rewarded for
what they have shown they can do rather than penalised for omissions.
• Examiners should mark according to the mark scheme not according to their
perception of where the grade boundaries may lie.
• There is no ceiling on achievement. All marks on the mark scheme should be
used appropriately.
• All the marks on the mark scheme are designed to be awarded. Examiners
should always award full marks if deserved, i.e. if the answer matches the mark
scheme. Examiners should also be prepared to award zero marks if the
candidate’s response is not worthy of credit according to the mark scheme.
• Where some judgement is required, mark schemes will provide the principles by
which marks will be awarded and exemplification may be limited.
• When examiners are in doubt regarding the application of the mark scheme to a
candidate’s response, the team leader must be consulted.
• Crossed out work should be marked UNLESS the candidate has replaced it with
an alternative response.
Theory Mark Scheme
<table border="1">
<th colspan="2">Some of our services</th>
<tr>
<td>Ironing</td>
<td>Laundry</td>
</tr>
</table>
Question Answer Additional Mark
number guidance
1 (d) Award two marks for a linked description such as: 2
1 Specifies that the paragraph with the tabindex of 1 (1) will be selected the first time the user
presses the tab key and so on (1)
2 Specifies the order that the paragraphs will be selected (1) when the tab key is pressed (1)
3 Weekly cleaning service will be selected first (1) when the tab key is pressed (1)
4 It indicates that the paragraphs are focusable (1) and gives the order that the focus will take
place (1)
Total mark for question 8
Page will load faster (1) as web safe fonts are installed locally on the user’s device (1)
Page may look different (1) if the font used is not installed locally on the user’s device (1)
(Web safe fonts are used to) make sure that content is visible (1) and standardised across browsers
(for all users) (1)
Question Answer Additional Mark
number guidance
3(a)(i) Award one mark for each correct value: 3
Variable Value
chargePerUnit 2
discount 0
totalCharges 400
1 To display the value of totalCharges on the same line as the message (1)
2 To concatenate totalCharges to the message (1)
3 To concatenate a string with a number (1)
Question Indicative content Mark
number
5 Should be identifying factors they think are important 9
• wireframe
• mock-up
• style guide
Wireframe
• Provided a clear overview of the page making it easy to see
where each of the elements would go
• Made it clear what the content would be for each element
e.g. gave file names for the content that would be used
• Good at showing the proportions for each of the elements
• Could clearly see the width of the page
• Was good as a method of seeing where the style guide
requirements would be applied as some elements were
named e.g. header, footer etc.
• Was very important but not enough on its own to develop
the webpage
• No time wasted trying to guess where to place each element
as could see where they would be.
• Was good as a method of testing after the page was built –
could check the widths matched the specification etc.
Mock-up
• Gave more detail visually so could see exactly what text
would be used and how it should look
• Could clearly see the colours used
• Was good as a quick way to test the finished web page to see
how well it matched the design
Was good as it gave a visual idea of what would be suitable
padding/margins as they were not specified anywhere else
• Could be matched to the style guide to visualise the effects
of the specifications given
• Was very important but not enough on its own to develop
the webpage
Style guide
• Gave clear specifications for each element though did rely on
the developer interpreting the wireframe and mock-up as no
specific guidelines given in terms of placement e.g. float etc.
• No time had to be wasted trying to what fonts etc. to use,
which would have wasted time
• Meant developer did not have to create a design
Level Mark Descriptor
0 No rewardable material
Level 1 1-3 • Applies understanding with limited coherence, showing limited
understanding of the given issue.
• Assessment of solution is superficial or unbalanced, and judgements
lack support from evidence.
Level 2 4-6 • Applies understanding to make some coherent connections,
showing some understanding of the given issue.
• Assessment of solution is partially developed, but this may be
unbalanced, using evidence to support some judgements.
Level 3 7-9 • Applies understanding coherently, showing a thorough
understanding of the given issue.
• Assessment of solution is balanced and developed, using evidence to
support judgements throughout.
Total for question 9
Code Mark Scheme
Award up to a maximum of six marks for the adherence to the component layout and the application of CSS using the levels based mark
scheme below.
Topic Area 0 1 2 3 Mark
Adherence No There is little adherence to the An attempt to adhere to the The webpage fully adheres to 3
to awardable component layout design, component layout design the component layout design
component content leading to a solution that is not fit leads to a solution that is, in and style requirements. The
layout for purpose or is not suitable for parts, fit for purpose and is, in resulting solution is fit for
design the intended audience. parts, suitable for the intended purpose and is suitable for the
audience. intended audience.
Application There is little attempt to make An attempt has been made to Consistent and accurate 3
of CSS to use of the facilities of CSS to use CSS to control the application of CSS is used
control control appearance and style. appearance and style of some throughout to control the
presentation Most components components. This has been appearance and style of all
rely on default configuration. successful in some cases. components.
Award up to a maximum of nine marks for the Functionality, user interface design, use of notation. Using the levels based mark scheme
below.
Topic area 0 1 2 3 Mark
Appropriate functionality: The component parts of The component parts of the The component parts of 3
the program are program are complete, the program are
• components and code have incorrect or incomplete, providing a functional complete, providing a
been decomposed into providing a program of program that meets some of functional program that
appropriate parts
limited functionality that the given requirements. fully meets the given
• dynamic behaviours are
meets some of the given requirements.
implemented in JavaScript.
requirements.
Mostly inappropriate Some parts of the logic are The logic is clear and
logic used. clear and mostly appropriate appropriate to the
to the problem. problem.
Appropriate interface design: The design of the user The design of the user The design of the user 3
interface lacks interface is in parts fit for interface is fully fit for
• error messages and other consideration for fitness purpose and addresses purpose and suitable for
status reports for purpose and the some of the needs of the
the intended audience.
• Interactivity between JavaScript intended audience. intended audience.
and HTML
Topic area 0 1 2 3 Mark
Limited use of accurate Uses mostly accurate syntax. Accurate syntax is used.
syntax.
Parts of the code are clear Code is mostly clear and Code is clear and readable,
and readable but much of readable, making some use making effective use of
it makes limited use of of appropriate spacing and appropriate spacing and
appropriate spacing and indentation. indentation.
indentation.
Total mark for question 20
Question 4 example code
CSS
59
HTML
Q06 Example Code
Change Password
Costs
Pearson Education Limited. Registered company number 872828
with its registered office at 80 Strand, London, WC2R 0RL, United Kingdom