This document discusses different types of texts and evidence that can be used to evaluate the validity of information heard or presented. It defines factual and literary texts, as well as persuasive and discussion texts. It also outlines characteristics of these different text types. The document then discusses types of evidence like testimonial, statistical, anecdotal, and analogical evidence. Finally, it outlines three types of questions - questions of fact, value, and policy - that can help evaluate the strength of an argument.
This document discusses different types of texts and evidence that can be used to evaluate the validity of information heard or presented. It defines factual and literary texts, as well as persuasive and discussion texts. It also outlines characteristics of these different text types. The document then discusses types of evidence like testimonial, statistical, anecdotal, and analogical evidence. Finally, it outlines three types of questions - questions of fact, value, and policy - that can help evaluate the strength of an argument.
This document discusses different types of texts and evidence that can be used to evaluate the validity of information heard or presented. It defines factual and literary texts, as well as persuasive and discussion texts. It also outlines characteristics of these different text types. The document then discusses types of evidence like testimonial, statistical, anecdotal, and analogical evidence. Finally, it outlines three types of questions - questions of fact, value, and policy - that can help evaluate the strength of an argument.
This document discusses different types of texts and evidence that can be used to evaluate the validity of information heard or presented. It defines factual and literary texts, as well as persuasive and discussion texts. It also outlines characteristics of these different text types. The document then discusses types of evidence like testimonial, statistical, anecdotal, and analogical evidence. Finally, it outlines three types of questions - questions of fact, value, and policy - that can help evaluate the strength of an argument.
We have learned from the previous topic about determining the
relevance and the truthfulness of the ideas presented in the
material viewed. Now, let us move on to judging the validity of the evidence listened to. Before that, let us understand the different text type first. A text refers to the written, spoken and visual forms of language that people live with every day. You heard this definition from Module 2. From the text you heard, you need to weigh if the evidences given by the writer are valid or not. As a 21st century learners, the changing world and global trends may influence or affect you as a person and as a citizen. Every day of your lives, you hear information from different sources. These information help you to become perceptive and widen your perspective about something and anything under the sun. In some cases, you will be forced to make decisions or make a stand about an issue or to judge the validity of the evidence you heard from an issue. All those things have an implication in your daily life. It will either make or break you as a person. For you to be ready during these circumstances, let’s hone your listening prowess by being familiar with the following terms: 1. Factual vs. Literary text
Factual texts inform, instructor persuade the reader or listener by giving
facts or information. The reader or listener wants to know something about a particular subject so they should give useful information and focus on facts. Examples of factual texts are news reports, interviews, recipes, records of history, and instructions. You often heard news reports over the radio, or television, read them in the newspaper or hear what happened from reliablesources. While reading or listening to a news report, you are already activating your knowledge about the information. Literary texts are pieces of writing that tell a story or entertain. They engage the reader/listener to respond emotionally by using creative language to paint pictures through words(imagery). They include nondramatic works with or without illustrations, published or unpublished. Examples of literary texts are fiction, nonfiction, manuscripts, poetry, dissertations, theses, speeches, pamphlets, brochures, and advertisements Characteristics of literary text include characters, setting, plot(problem/solution), and sequence. These characteristics help the reader understand who is in the story, where and when the story takes place, what happens in the story, and how the events happen(www.pdesas.org) 2. Persuasive text vs. Discussion Text Persuasive text/ writing offers the opportunity to convince the reader/ listener to adopt a particular viewpoint or to believe in what the writer is telling. It is designed to prompt the reader or listener to take a certain action. It is very common in ad campaigns wherein they are marketing/selling a certain product and they are convincing you to buy their product. Ads can also be used in several situations as well like reminders or election campaigns Discussion text/ content also known as argumentative text/ content presents an issue surrounding a particular topic--usually one that is debatable and open to arguments. In here, the writer needs to discuss both sides of the issue to make sure that you researched and gathered enough information about the topic. To know if the information presented by the writer is valid or not, you need to extract the supporting (pros) and opposing (cons) opinions about the issue. Many writers use argumentative content to persuade the readers or listeners to agree to their points of view. The information may influence you to believe certain ideas and push you to take some form of action. An argumentative content tries to change the reader’s mind by convincing him/her to agree with the writer’s point of view. It is a piece of writing that takes a stance on an issue. The writer attempts to persuade readers to understand and support their point of view about a topic by stating their reasoning and providing evidence to back it up. It should have a straightforward structure so they are easy for readers to follow. The goal of an argumentative content is to clearly outline a point of view, reasoning, and evidence. (www.masterclass.com.articles) Characteristics of an Argumentative Content An argumentative essay attempts to be highly persuasive and logical. It usually assumes that the reader disagrees with the writer, but it should be noted that the reader is no less intelligent than the writer. Hence, an argumentative content should be written objectively and logically. An argumentative content has the following characteristics: • Presents and explains the issue or case • Gives reasons and supports these reasons to prove its point • Refutes(prove wrong) opposing arguments Parts of an Argumentative Content 1. Introduction First is the introductory paragraph. It introduces the problem and gives the background information needed for the argument and the thesis statement. The thesis statement/Topic sentence is a concise, one-sentence summary of your main point and claim. 2. Body The body of the essay contains the reasons. It is a three or more paragraphs that explain the reasons why you support your thesis. Each paragraph talks about one reason and it should cover a different idea or piece of evidence and contain a topic sentence that clearly explains why the reader should agree with your position. These supporting materials can be examples, research, statistics, studies, and text citations, personal experiences or quotations. Address opposing points of view and disprove them or explain why you disagree with them. 3. Conclusion One paragraph that restates the thesis and summarizes all of the arguments made in the body paragraphs. Rather than introducing new facts or more arguments, a good conclusion will appeal to a reader’s emotions. To judge the validity of the evidence listened to, you need to be familiar with the essential concepts in evaluating an argument. You have to bear in mind the following steps: 1. Identify the point the speaker is trying to prove (the claim). 2. Identify the specific facts the speaker give to support the claim 3. Explain how the evidence supposed to relate to the claim Types of evidences: A. Testimonial evidences are statements of truth from a certain person made under oath in a court or testimonies offered to prove the truth of the matter. B. Statistical evidences are the result of researches or surveys that can never be proven because of probability or likelihood which is from random sampling. C. Anecdotal evidences are collected in a casual or informal manner and relying heavily or entirely on personal testimony. D. Analogical or a specific way of thinking, based on the idea that two or more things are similar in some aspects, there is a tendency that they are also similar in other aspect. These three specific types of questions lead to your opinion: 1. Questions of Fact are those that ask you to answer whether or not something is true. These questions are always answerable with either “Yes” or “No”. Example: Is the wall blue? (Yes or No, and then evidence) 2. Questions of Value address the relative merit (goodness or badness) of something. Here you are usually asked to choose between things, ideas, beliefs, or actions. Example: Which is more valuable, love or money? (Which and why?) 3. Questions of Policy ask the writer to explain what they would do. The key word of these topics is usually “should” as in “what should we do…?) The question asks the writer to make a plan of action to solve some sort of problem. The answer is a breakdown of the plan and a justification that it fixes the problem. Example: What should be done to combat the drug problem? (Plan and justify)