Modern and Post Modern Thought-1
Modern and Post Modern Thought-1
Modern and Post Modern Thought-1
Ulysses
The opening words ofJames Joyce's Ulysses seem initially to
come from the realist world, but the appearances are going to
be deceptive, and they become more so as we go through the
novel, and its stylistic deviations become more obvious, even
though' they are at base founded in remarkably accur
Stately, plump Buck Mulligan came from the stairhead,
bearing a bowl of lather on which a mirror and a razor lay
crossed. A yellow dressing gown, ungirdled, was sustained
behind him by the mild morning air. He held the bowl aloft
and intoned:
- Introibo ad altare Dei.
Halted, he peered down the dark winding stairs and called up
coarsely:
- Come up, Kinch. Come up, you fearful jesuit.
The (Pfimåifiifö'derms ltöéhiüquehere lies in Joyce's making
of allus10nS, which lead us to feel the presence of
underlying conceptual or formal structures. And so, as Hugh
Kenner notes in his brilliant guide, in this book, whose
narrative will parallel that of Homer's Odyssey, the first nine
words mimic the rhythms of a
Homeric hexameter, and the bowl Mulligan bears is also, in the
a sacrificial chalice on which his shaving
gear lies 'crossed'. His yellow dressing gown echoes a priest's
3 vestments — for those days when no other colour was
specified in gold and white. And furthermore, 'ungirdled' (the
cincture not tied as it would be for the priest's ritual affirmation
of chastity), it leaves him frontally naked, his private parts on
display for mild air to caress; he is aware of that too. And
'intoned' is deliberate; preparing to shave, he is also playing at
the Black Mass with its naked priest. The words he speaks,
which belong to the Ordinary of the Catholic Mass, come from
St Jerome's Latin version of Hebrew words ascribed to a
Psalmist in exile: 'I will go up to the altar of God.' It is therefore
a quotation of a quotation of a quotation, and originally a
Hebrew cry for help amid persecution.
On a later reading we may also remark the appropriateness, for
its Jewish hero: the modern Ulysses of an
statement in disguised Hebrew, and note, too, that as the Roman
priest adopts the role ofthe Psalmist, so Irish political
consciousn% in those years was playing the role ofthe captive
Chosen People, With Great Britain for its Babylon or its Egypt.
U
lysse"s paradigmatically modernist, at like The Waste Land and
the Cantos, it is a encyclopaedic interconnectedness, with an
immepsggpncern fo cultural changes within the life ofthe city; One
of the things th Joyce gains from this, for the novel, is a mythical
as well as an historical organization of narrative, and so also a
means for comparing cultures in variously satirical ways: (hoy are
theÄfrishh a persecuted 'chosen people'?
La Ville
ways
Mirö, and
Mondrian, Joan many others. The effect ofthis on painters like
Léger was partly to make geometric pattern or design a main
—--thinzs.
steean see fronvthecontradictory definitions stratcgieswhicb
then applied to newovqrk$sofar& example, when F, S.
Flint, a collaborator with Ezra Pound in promoting the so-
called 'Imagist School' of poetry, saw p
0917), which combined Erik Satie's popular music-derived%
cubist costumes by Picasso and an entirely absurd libr
Jean Cocteau, at the Empire Leicester Square in London
lure the public inside their booths. But you begin to wonder whether the programme's
analysis of the newly presented ballet is not just another bit of M. Massine's fun, when
you discover the 'American Manager' disguised as a skyscraper, and 'The
Manager' as another architectural joke, and 'The Circus Managers' bumped
together into the most comical pantomime horse that ever was seen. M.
Massine as the Chinese Conjurer is recognisable, so is Mme Karsavina as the
ridiculous American child, not of the eighteenth but ofthe twentieth
century, wearing a sailor coat and a huge white bow in her hair: and there is
no mistaking Mlle Nemtchinova and M. Zverev as the acrobats in their skin-
tight blue.
By this time (November 1919), there were, for Flint as for everyone else, many new
styles and techniques to be found in contemporary art, because of the great
efflorescence of technicavghange from 49QOt0&1916. In painting, the
fauvists, following Gaugin and Vincent Van Gogh, had abandoned local colour, so
that a tree coüldi be blue; the cubists had abandoned single-point perspective; and
Kandinsky had moved towards an abstract painting which did not seem to present
real-world objects at all. Joyce was already well into the most experimental episodes
of Ulysses, which were all written in widely divergent st les usin all the fi r
Anglo-Saxon to modern American in 'Oxen', of popular fiction in
Nausicaa', and pretty well every form ofDadaist, expressionist, and
surreal fantasy in Circe', and much more. Arnold Schoenberg and
his followers had invented an atonal music which, rather like cubist
painting, refused to coordinate the work by reference to central
tonal organizing points, so that the hierarchy of chordal
relationships that had ruled for centuriés had been abandoned, and
a new freedom of association between sounds had been invented.
Igor Stravinsky had made never-before-heard and wildly irregular
rhythmic constructions in the Sacre du printemps (1913) and the
poetic experiments of Guillaume Apollinaire and Blaise Cendrars,
Ezra Pound and T. S. Eliot, August Stramm and Filippo Tommaso
Marinetti, had collaged and juxtaposed fragments of narrative and
imagery, leaving out many of those syntactic and logical
connectives which had previously articulated a story for the reader.
All this led to a stylistic variation in each of the arts that was 3 central
to the modernist period. Picasso is the classic exponent of this, and
was a great stealer from others. Through his early career he develops
from early Impressionist imitations, through to a 'Blue Period', and
then a cubist, and then a neoclassical one. His development is not
linear, but cumulative and overlapping: like Joyce and Stravinsky and
Eliot, he has many styles of expression available. For these modernists,
the canon of past art is always available for reinterpretation, imitation,
and even parody or pastiche. 'To me there is no past and future in art',
said Picasso, and in the end, it's the personality of these artists that holds
things together (and that is why, despite his advocacy of 'impersonality,
the collage of quotations in Eliot's The Waste Land can be seen as
sexual confession, rather like the extraordinary range of deformations
that Picasso inflicts on the bodies of women).
'If the subjects I have wanted to express have suggested different
ways of expression I have never hesitated to adopt them', said
Picasso. This modernist choice of styles is not a sign of instability,
stylc in
unity of
ofdylc is liberal d
Nazi
reversion to
urban cultural
and the distance enabled by parody. Ifwe can answer such questions
we are well on understanding modernistart. t ecd to
knowhow these technical changes were driv by new ideas, or
changes in an artist's conceptual scheme, ofa revolutionary kind.
The artist is sustained in the making offo discoveries by the
expectation that they will be significant in to a particular content.
That is, they lead to a cognitive gain, because the technical
and experimental development we see in modernist work nearly
always arises out ofprofound shifts in the intellectual
assumptions ofartists. It is the ideas in the heads ofmen and
women, such as those concerning the self, myth, the
unconscious, and sexual identity, which the modernists took
from authorities like Friedrich Nietzsche, Henri Bergson, Filippo
Tommaso Marinetti, James Frazer, Sigmund Freud, Carl jung,
Albert Einstein, and others, that make cultural revolutions. The
idea - of making cross-cultural allusions, or oflooking for a
quasi-scientific analytical pattern - prompts a change in artistic
technique. fiese breakthroughs are by definition 'progressive',
because once you can master the technique (or, more feebly,
imitate it, as minor cubists like Albert Gleizes and Jean
Metzinger did), you can do something that you couldn't do
before.