Section 2 Notes, New

MUHA
+92 317 2631567 connectwithmym@gmail.com www.muhammadyousufmemon.com
PARTITION OF BENGAL
PARTITION PLAN
 The Viceroy Lord Curzon proposed to partition Bengal in 1903 but it was
implemented in 1905.
 Three areas Dhaka, Chittagong, and Myemnsingh were separated and merged
with Assam to create a new province called East Bengal, which was Muslim
majority area
 Due to this partition Hindus and Muslims were divided along communal lines.
WHY PARTITION WAS DONE?
BENGAL WAS MOST DENSELY POPULATED PROVINCE
 It was done because Bengal was considered as the most densely populated
province in the British India & about 85 Million people were living in that
part.
 There were many administrative problems for the British government and it
was difficult to control as well.
 Bengal was of the size of France and it was difficult for the British rulers to
control such a huge land.
 British fear that they would lose their control over India.
TO GIVE RELAXATION TO MUSLIMS
 They wanted to give more relaxations & power to the Muslims due to the role
played by the reformers like Sir Syed to remove misunderstandings between
the Muslims & the British.
 They had realized that Muslims were victimized after war of 1857 so they
should be given advance in this new province.
 The Hindus were in majority in West Bengal i.e. 42 million while the muslims
were only 12 million.
 The muslims were in majority in East Bengal i.e. 18 million while the hindus
were only 12 million.
 British thought that muslims were in majority in new province so it would be
able for muslims to prosper and dominate in different sectors which will help
to improve relations between muslims and british.
OLEVEL PAK STUDIES I 2059/01 I SECTION 2 I NOTES

MUHAMMAD YOUSUF MEMO
TO BREAK THE POWER OF CONGRESS
 They wanted to break the power of the Hindus in many parts of India &
Bengal was its perfect example that they followed the policy of divide & rule
in those areas.
 In United Bengal, hindus dominated and exploited muslims and kept them as
a deprived section of a society.
 The area of Bengal could easily be controlled by the Hindu extremists, so
british had a fear of losing control on such a vast province.
TO DEVELOP EAST BENGAL
 According to british, partition will result in equal development throughout

Bengal.
 There were great differences between east and west Bengal.
 The east being the more neglected.
 The west being developed and was using the resources of east Bengal to
develop itself.
 It was therefore decided to partition Bengal to allow for development in
education and employment to be generated throughout the Bengal which
would improve Bengal economically for future.
CULTURAL DIFFERENCES
 As Bengal was densely populated province so different communities were

living there, belonging to different races, speaking different languages &
practicing different religions.
 This multicultural environment created problems for the government so
british divided the Bengal.
DIVIDE AND RULE POLICY
 The Hindus believed that the partition would come about as part of the
British ‘divide and rule’ policy which would weaken Hindu unity and its
influence in the new East Bengal.
RESULTS OF PARTITION
 Muslims expressed complete satisfaction over this partition, Now they can
send their representatives in the assembly. The number of primary and high

MUHA
schools increased. The number of muslim students were also increased. New
steam service of railway was also started in East Bengal.
 Muslims of India realized that they could not more live with the hindus, and
they should organize themselves to have their own political party to
safeguard their political rights and interests.
 Muslims of india had organized to put forward their demands against the
british government for approval through SIMLA DEPUTATION.
 Hindus made a huge large cry as they were not happy. They lost their
monopoly over muslims in every aspect. They felt it great threat to their
domination.
 Moderate and liberal Hindus protested through constitutional methods,
passed resolutions, sent petitions to the government and to the Secretary of
State, wrote in print media, met with English politicians in India and
conveyed them Indian grievances.
 Hindus kept fast on the day of partition as symbolic hunger strike, wore
threads on their arms to convey message of solidarity and unity.
 Protests, strikes, demonstration with banners in hands, marches, public
speeches.
 Swadeshi movement launched encouraging the use of home made goods,
boycott of british goods.
 Hindu militant groups emerged launching attacks on British officials.
 Strong agitation and protest forced the British to reverse the partition of
Bengal.
 In 1911. King George V reversed the partition in Delhi Durbar.
HOW BRITISH REACTED TO HINDU-LED PROTESTS?
 Newspapers and public meetings had restrictions placed upon them. Editors
of newspapers and journalists who made reports against british were either
prosecuted or imprisoned.
 The Press Act of 1908 placed further restrictions on newspapers and gave
the government greater control over them which means main control of press
was in hands of british.
 One organiser of Hindu-led demonstrations, Tilak of Poona was sentenced to
6 years imprisonment. Others were deported or left the country of their
own accord rather than face imprisonment.

N
 Another approach intended to win support of the more moderate Hindus by
making reforms. Lord Minto the Viceroy worked with John Morley, the
Secretary of State for India, on reforms that became the Morley Minto
reforms in 1909.
WHY PARTITION WAS REVERSED?
PROTEST, STRIKES, RALLIES
 The Hindus’ objection to Partition was so great that it caused the British to
reconsider it.
 Congress opposed it by holding meetings and there were mass rallies which
put pressure on the British government.
 They thought it was a deliberate attempt to ‘divide and rule’ on the part of
the British. In many areas of India, they started strikes, protests and
marches.
 There was also an outbreak of terrorist activities and the Hindus closed
Calcutta for few days.
SWADESHI MOVEMENT
 The Hindus did not like British policies as well as their products so they
started their boycott of British goods under the Swadeshi Movement.
 They prepared their own hand make Khaddar to wear and as a result of this
the British face net loss in the sale of British Silk.
 British cotton was thrown in fire & local cotton became a matter of honour.
 Swadeshi movement gave economic damage to british government.
ATTEMPT TO ASSASSINATE LORD MINTO
 The Hindus were so angry that they attempted to assassinate Lord Minto
because he was the future viceroy of India and Lord Curzon, originator of
the idea, was no longer viceroy so a change of policy was easier.
 So they tried their best to convince the British to reverse the partition of
Bengal.

MUHA
SIMLA DEPUTATION
WHY MUSLIMS TOOK DELEGATION TO SIMLA?
ROLE OF CONGRESS
PARTITION OF BENGAL
ANNOUNCEMENT BY BRITISH ABOUT NEW REFORMS
SIMLA DELEGATION
 In 1905 the Liberals won the elections in Britain and announced to give more
representation to the local people in the govt. of India through elections. 
John Morley wanted to Muslim support due to their improved relations.
 In October 1906, british government announced that the constitutional
reform was due in India in 1909 and new legislative council will have more

N
Indian representation. This created political unrest among muslims as they
were in minority.
 Lord Minto became Viceroy of India in 1905 and he was enjoying his
vacations at Simla where a delegation of 35 Muslim Leaders led by Sir Agha
Khan met him in 1906. Other prominent leaders were NawabMohsin-ul-Mulk,
Nawab-Wiqar-ul-mulk and nawab Sir Salimullah.
 It was known that he would introduce some new reforms in India.
 The deputation demanded:
• Muslim seats in the legislatures more than their population.
• They wanted to have more representation in army & quota (specific
seats) in government jobs. The seats in the courts for the Muslims.
• The main demand was separate electorate for the Muslims (It means
that the Hindus would vote for Hindu candidate & Muslims for Muslim
candidate) because at that time any seat might cause a dispute and the
Muslims were in minority.
 Lord Minto gave a patient hearting to the muslim demands but did not gave
any assurance regarding the acceptance of demands but he was pretty
sympathetic to separate electorates and it was a great success for the
Muslims.
 Lord Minto sent these reforms to Lord Morley who accepted the demands of
separate electorates.
 In response of Simla deputation the Congress also sent its delegation
represented by Feroz Shah Mehta, who totally rejected the proposals
extended by the Muslims & due to this the Hindu-Muslim hostility increased.
IMPORTANCE OF SIMLA DELEGATION
DEMAND OF SEPARATE ELECTORATE WAS ACCEPTED
 The Muslim demands for separate representation, election by only Muslim

voters and weightage in all elected bodies were accepted by the British.
 It was the main demand of the British for a long time but when the group of
the Muslims met with the Viceroy Lord Minto accepted their main demand.

MUHA
IMPROVE RELATIONS BETWEEN MUSLIMS AND BRITISH
 This resulted in a sudden upturn in Muslim-British relations and helped to

remove the previous bad feelings between the 2 sides.
 Muslims got true recognition for the first time after 1857 by getting better
relation with british.
 The credit goes to the efforts of Sir Syed who removed the
misunderstandings between the Muslims and the British.
PROVIDED MUSLIMS CONFIDENCE
 It also guaranteed Muslims an independent role in the political process and

as a result led to the formation of the All Indian Muslim League later in the
year.
 So they launched a political party to protect the rights of the Indian
Muslims.
 It was the first real political step towards a separate homeland.

ALL INDIA MUSLIM LEAGUE

WHY WAS AIML FOUNDED?
INC WAS A HINDU ORGANIZATION
 Muslim rights would not be advanced if they continued to rely on the Indian
National Congress.
 It was seen as an organization which would only advance Hindu views.
 The Congress was demanding that India should be treated as a cultural whole
(Democratic) and Hindi should be declared the official language.
 Sir Syed also also warned muslims not to become congress member as Sir
Syed knew that it was a hindu dominated party and which will only safeguard
the rights of hindus.
 INC rejected the partition of Bengal.
TO ORGANIZE AND UNITE THE MUSLIMS
 By not organizing a Muslim group they would continue to be disorganized and

disunited.
 The Muslims were needing a political platform to organize all the Muslims
against the other parties of India.
 This new political party could also be used to raise their voice in front of the
British govt.

MUHA
TO PROTECT THE RELIGIOUS RIGHTS OF MUSLIMS
 Even more worrying was the growth of extreme Hindu nationalist groups like
“Arya Samaj” who demanded that Muslims be forcibly converted to
Hinduism.
 Therefore, a number of prominent Muslim leaders founded the Muslim
League to protect the religious rights of the Indian Muslims because the
Muslims were facing problems to practice Islam freely under the Hindu
domination.
TO IMPROVE RELATIONS BETWEEN MUSLIMS AND BRITISH
 The Hindus were beginning to protest against partition of Bengal and the
Muslims saw this as a sign of the influence the Hindus had and they were
worried about their own interests.
 So the Muslims wanted to reduce the influence of the Hindus.
 The protests, strikes and rallies were giving bad impression to British about
Indians (not hindus only) so Muslims thought that if they will continue with
INC so this will make their relations worse as in war in 1857.
 The Muslims also wanted to remove the misunderstandings between the
British and the Muslims so that they could get the advantage of the better
relations of the British in the absence of Sir Syed.
SUCCESS OF SIMLA DELEGATION
 The successes of Simla delegation and partition of Bengal also gave the
Muslims a motivation to start their political party because they were aware
of that again and again groups of people would not have that importance
which was under the Congress platform so they needed a political platform
to counter the problems caused by the Hindus.
EDUCATIONAL AND ECONOMICAL BACKWARDNESS
 Muslims had lagged far behind from the hindus in education and economic
progress.
 Educational and economic condition could only be upgraded by establishing a
separate muslim organization that could represent the wishes of the
muslims.

N
PARTITION OF BENGAL
 Hindus protested against the partition of Bengal

 Muslims saw this as a sign of the influence the Hindus had over the British
 The Muslims started to think about their own survival and political
representation
 Muslims were also increasingly aware that their political rights would not be
advanced if they continued to rely on the Indian National Congress.
 By not organising a Muslim group they would continue to be disorganised and
disunited over the partition.
FORMATION
 In 1906 the 20th annual meeting of the Muslim Educational Conference was
going on at the residence of Nawab Salim Ullah Khan of Decca.
 NawabWaqar Ul Mulk presided over the meeting & members of the meeting
stressed on a separate party for the Muslims.
 After the meeting Nawab Salim Ullah Khan proposed the formation of a
separate political party for the Muslims and suggested the name of All India
Muslim Confederacy for it.
 On 30th December 1906 All India Muslim League was formed in Dhaka.
 Nawab Waqar-Ul-Mulk was nominated as the president and Nawab Mohsin-
ulMulk as the General Secretary.
 The 1st annual session of AIML was held in 1907 at Karachi under the
chairmanship of Sir Adamjee Pir Bhai and 2nd Session in 1908 in Aligarh, on
this occasion Sir Agha Khan was appointed as the president and Bilgarmi as
the new General Secretary. Its 3rd President was Muhammad Ali Jauhar.
Mian Muhammad Shafi was its 4th while Jinnah became life time President in
1934.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
 To save the interests of Muslims of sub-continent and no convey their

demands to the government
 To create feelings of good will and respect for the government amongst the
Muslims
 To remove misunderstandings about any action of the government
 To bring all nations of India closer together to achieve the targets

MUHA
MORLEY MINTO REFORMS

WHY MORLEY MINTO REFORMS INTRODUCED BY BRITISH?
 The British govt. was sick of the issues after partition of Bengal so to
resolve the communal tensions between the HINDUS & THE MUSLIMS.
They started these reforms so that both the parties could resolve their
issues politically by stopping violence in India.
 The British govt. wanted to work on the plan of reforms in 10 years so that
all the Indian parties could be ruled by making the constitution of Indian
with the help of all the political parties of India. They wanted to give the
power to the Indians step by step so they planned to do it after every ten
years.
 The British govt. wanted to enlarge the councils by adding Indians in the law
making councils so that they can get the ideas of the demands of the Indians
and could resolve their issues. The govt. wanted to know the views of the
Indians and wanted to convey their messages to the Indians.
MORLEY MINTO REFORMS
 In 1905 Lord Minto as Viceroy replaced Lord Curzon and in 1906 John
Morley was appointed as secretary of state for India.

N
 They both agreed that the demand of the Indians to have more shares in
the govt. was according to justice.
 These reforms were passed by the British Parliament as the Indian Councils
Act (1909).
 The main provisions of these reforms were:
• Enlarging of the Imperial Council to 60 members by adding more
nonofficials.
• Enlarging of the Central Executive Council by adding 60 new members.
• Enlarging of Provincial Councils to 50 members in (large provinces) & 30
in (small provinces).
• Members of Central Council were allowed to discuss budget,
administration, official matters & so on.
• The right of separate electorate and separate constituencies for the
Muslims.
• Women were not allowed to vote.
• Indian Legislature could just express their opinions, could not change or
influence decisions.
• Members of executive council were permitted to discuss budget,
administration, official policies and matters of general importance.
REACTION
 Congress opposed this reforms. The acceptance of the rights of the Muslims
to have a separate electorate was a remarkable event for the Muslim and
rejected by the Congress. Hindus also resented the relative high position of
Muslims in the Councils despite their much smaller numbers. Hindu-Muslim
relations got strained. Hindus had developed a sense of mistrust, hatred and
policy of non-cooperation towards muslims. Congress and Hindu politicians
demanded to reverse these reforms or to cancel Muslim representation.
 Muslims found these reforms favourable for themselves.
 Overall both parties criticized these reforms as Indians can advise only.
WHY CONGRESS OPPOSE MORLEY MINTO REFORMS?

NO SELF RULE WAS GRANTED
 The British intended that the Indians could voice their opinions in the
Councils but Congress wanted more responsibility, which the government
were not prepared to give.
 This annoyed many who were looking towards self-rule.
 The Hindus wanted self-rule but they ignored them and gave more power to
the Muslims.
DEMAND OF SEPARATE ELCTORATES BY MUSLIMS ACCEPTED BY

BRITISH
 The British accepted the right of Muslims to have separate electorates,

which also annoyed some Hindus who saw it as a concession too far.
 The Hindus wanted the right of joint electorate for all the areas of India
because they were in majority and could easily win elections in many areas
but the British granted the right of Separate electorate to the Muslims.
INDIANS WERE ADVISORS ONLY
 Indian legislature had no control over the executive legislature.

 They could only pass recommendations only which could be disallowed by the
Viceroy.
 Also the legislature could not pass any resolution on matters concerning army
and foreign relations which Hindus wanted.
MUSLIMS GAIN CONTROL ON HIGH POSTS
 The Hindus were aware of the power of the Muslims after winning the seats
in the future elections so some Hindus also resented the relative high
position of Muslims in the Councils despite their much smaller numbers.
 The Hindus did not wish that the Muslims should control even few high posts.
TO REVERSE THE PARTITION OF BENGAL
 Hindus thought that if they would oppose these reforms so there will be a
chance of reversal.
 As partition of Bengal was a negative point for hindus so they tried every
possible way to reverse that partition.

MUHA
N
 They found it a very good chance to create a pressure on british by opposing
it which will pressurize british to reverse the partition.
LUCKNOW PACT
WHY LUCKNOW PACT WAS SIGNED?
STEPS TAKEN BY BRITISH WERE ANTI-MUSLIM
 In 1911 partition of Bengal reversed which was an anti-Muslim step  In

1912-13 the “Balkan Wars” begun in Eastern Europe.
 The British fought against the Muslims of Turkey and the Indian Muslims
considered it as another Anti-Muslims step of the British so they moved
towards the Hindus.
 Muslims thought British are doing antimuslim things so they decided to move
towards Hindus for their betterment.

BRITISH WERE NOT ABLE TO FULFILL THE DEMANDS OF HINDUS
 British government could not grant the power to Hindus according to their
promises till 1914.
 This brought INC close to AIML as INC thought that if both parties will
work together so it will be easy to take self-rule from british.
JINNAH WANTED HINDU-MUSLIM UNITY
 Jinnah always tried his best for the Hindu-Muslim unity & did many efforts
to achieve this target.
 It is considered as the biggest effort of Jinnah to bring both the parties
closer to each other.
 He was working as a member of both the parties for this reason.
 Due to his advice the Muslim League added the demand of self-rule in their
agenda in 1913 when Jinnah joined Muslim League.
 He got an opportunity when in 1915 both the Muslim League and Congress
were having their annual meeting in Bombay.
INC AND AIML WANTED TO WORK TOGETHER ON CONSTITUTIONAL

REFORMS
 In this situation moderate leaders like Jinnah from Muslim League and
Gokhle from Congress played an important role.
 Hindus acknowledged that Muslims had the right to a separate electorate
and was therefore seen as a beacon of hope for the future.
 The Muslims and Hindus wanted to work together on constitutional reform.
 The Muslim League and the Congress agreed to cooperate to persuade the
British government to accept their demands.
LUCKNOW PACT
 Lucknow Pact refers to an agreement between INC and AIML.
 In 1916 again both the parties had their annual session in Lucknow & Jinnah
succeeded to bring both the parties closer to each Other.
 Muslim League in this Agreement was represented by Jinnah while
AmbekaCharan Mahajan led Congress.
 The most important features were:
• Self-Government should be established in India.

MUHA
N
• The Congress accepted the right of separate electorate and the seats
for the Muslims
• The Muslims were also given one-third seats in Central Legislative
Council.
• Both the parties agreed that they would not agree on an act affecting
any community unless three-quarter of the community accepted it.
• Number of elected seats on the councils should be increased & minorities
should be protected.
• Both the parties agreed on the demand that more seats to be given by
the elections as well as provincial autonomy (Power).
• Seats shall be reserved for the muslims in those provinces in which they
are in minority and protection shall be given to Hindus living in majority
provinces.
IMPORTANCE OF LUCKNOW PACT
FIRST TIME BOTH PARTIES WORKED TOGETHER
 It was the first time that the Hindus & the Muslims had made a joint
demand for political reforms.
 It marked the first acceptance by the Hindus that the degree of partition
would be necessary in any self-governing India.
 The Muslims had realized that they need to work with all other parties on
the other hand the Hindus had realize that the Hindu-Muslim problems were
the same & they should work together to drive the British away from India.
HINDU-MUSLIM RELATIONS GOT BETTER
 It marked the high water mark of the Hindu-Muslim unity.

 It was the greatest success of Jinnah to bring both the parties closer
because he always tried his best to bring the Hindus and the Muslims closer
to each other.
FIRST TIME APPROVAL OF SEPARATE ELECTORATE BY HINDUS

SECURITY OF MUSLIM RIGHTS AND INTERESTS WERE GUARANTEED
MUSLIM LEAGUE SEPARATE STATUS WAS ACCEPTED BY CONGRESS
MONTAGUE CHELMSFORD REFORMS

WHY BRITISH GOVT ANNOUNCE MONTAGUE CHELMSFORD
REFORMS?

MUHA
N
AFTER 10 YEARS REFORMS WERE TO BE INTRODUCED
 It was issued because the British govt. was following a policy to introduce
reforms after every 10 years and it had been the time since they introduced
Morley-Minto reforms in 1909.
 So they had to announce new reforms according to their policy in 1919.
BRITISH WANTED FAVOR FROM INDIANS
 The British govt. wanted get the favour of the Indians by giving them
relaxation in these reforms.
 Because they were thinking that if they would introduce these reforms they
would get the Indian favour by giving them share in the govt. council.
TO IMPROVE THEIR REFORMS
 They wanted to check the success of their previous reforms (Morley-Minto

reforms) & to plan for the future reforms of India (Simon Commission).
 They never wanted to see that the Indians would not accept it like they did
in last reforms.
MONTAGUE CHELMSFORD REFORMS

 In 1919 Viceroy of India Lord Chelmsford and secretary state for India
Lord Montague took a tour for India and discussed the constitutional work
with Indian people.
 They sent constitutional reforms to britishgovt for ratification.
 These were ratified by the britishgovt and were implanted in India with
name of Mont-Ford reforms.
 Its main recommendations were as follows
• Bicameral Legislature was first time established in the center and it was
approved that the time period of the elected members of the upper
house(Council of state) was to be 5 years and the Lower
House(Legislative Assembly) to be 3 years. Upper house had total 60
members, 33 were elected and 27 were nominated. Lower house had 145
members, 104 were elected and 41 were nominated.
• System of “Diarchy” was introduced in the provinces which gave
authority to the central govt. to interfere in the provincial matters.

• Reserved subjects (Justice, Police, Revenue, and Power & Press) were to
be controlled by the Governor while Transferred subjects (Local govt.
Education, Health, Public Works & Forests) were controlled by Ministers.
• Separate electorates were also accepted first time for the both the
Muslims and the Sikhs.
• Out of 103 seats in the Imperial Legislative Council 32 seats would be
reserved for the Muslims.
• The Council of State was consisted of 60 members
• A Council of Princess was also setup with 108 members
• The Legislative Council should now be called as the Legislative Assembly
• The British govt. also claimed that they were extending voting rights for
locals.
• The Viceroy was given full power to pass any bill & appoint the provincial
Governors
• The British govt. promised to introduce more constitutional reforms
after 10 years.
RESULTS
 The Muslims League and Congress both were hoping much more from the
British govt. but it kept the main powers.
 In congress some moderates accepted these & they were dismissed from
Congress while most of them rejected these reforms while Muslims League
could not achieve anything new.
 Muslims were given separate electorate so other minorities like Sikhs &
others also demanded the concessions.
 Local people of India wanted that the country should be according to their
desire while the power was granted to Viceroy.
ROWLATT ACT
 In December 1917 a committee was formed under Justice Rowlett to study

the revolutionary activities in India & it recommended that some measure to
be taken urgently to control this attitude.
 However, both the parties had to accept it because of The Rowlett Act
(1919).

MUHA
N
 This act gave the right of arrest to anyone without a warrant, detention
without bail & right of the provincial govt. to order people where to live.
 Gandhi and others found that constitutional opposition to the measure were
useless; so on April 6 Hartal was organized where Indians would suspend all
business and fast as a sign of their hatred. This event is known as Rowlatt
Satyagraha.
 Due to this act Jinnah resigned from the Imperial Legislative Council &
Gandhi gave a call for Strike against this black law.
 Due to the introduction of these reforms there was much dissatisfaction in
the small provinces because they had lost their power.
 The British govt. banned all the anti govt. publications, demonstrations due
to violence. In the Punjab there was a great effect of Rowlett Act.
AMRITSAR MASSACRE
 April 13 1919
 In Amritsar, a meeting was arranged but it was banned by the govt.
 The organizers Sikhs, Muslims and Hindus decided to go there.
 In that peaceful demonstration nearly 20 thousand people gathered at
Jallianwala Bagh.
 The British govt. did not give permission for such gatherings.
 A British Officer General Dyer was dealing the situation that ordered the
soldiers to open fire on the civilians.
 Around 400 people were killed & 1200 wounded in Jallianwala Bagh Incident.
 To investigate this incident HUNTER COMMITTEE was set up in England in
October 1919 after issues ordered by Secretary of State for India, Lord
Montague .
 General Dyer was removed from his services but he was not punished for it.
WHY INDIANS OPPOSED MONTAGUE CHELMSFORD REFORMS?
INDIANS WERE EXPECTING MUCH MORE
 The Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms disappointed the Muslims and Hindus as

they had hoped for greater concessions.
 Central government reserved sweeping powers for itself with only minor
concessions for the locals.

 As the Indians had supported the British during WWI they felt that the
British government should reward this by giving them more responsibility in
running their own affairs.
DIARCHY WAS IMPOSED ON PROVINCES
 Diarchy gave the right to governors (mainly british) to intervene in the

provincial matters.
 This means that main powers and all authorities were in the hands of British.
 Indians realized that they were not provided with any power.
POWERS OF GOVERNOR GENERAL
 These reforms gave too many powers in hands of Governor General.

 He could appoint Provincial governors and ministers, could pass any law, could
suspend the constitution.
ONLY 2% PEOPLE CAN VOTE
 Only 2% people can vote which means out of 250 million only 5 million people
could vote.
 Voting is the right and which was taken from the Indians.
WHY INDIA WAS NOT GRANTED SELF RULE BY BRITAIN IN 1919?
 Britain was severely weakened after WW1, especially economically. All

colonial nations were facing demands from their colonies for independence in
one form or another, and Britain viewed India as the jewel of the Empire.
 Britain’s standing as a world power would be weakened if it gave in to Indian
demands.
 Strategically, India was important for the British navy and British influence
in the region. Therefore the British were reluctant to give in to Indian
demands
 There were many thousands of British people living in India who could not be
abandoned. The British government did not want to lose these businessmen,
missionaries and civil servants.

MUHA
KHILAFAT MOVEMENT
WHY WAS IT FOUNDED?
MUSLIMS HELD CALIPHATE OF TURKEY IN HIGH REGARD
 The First World War broke out in 1914 & ended in 1918.
 The Turkish Ottoman Empire was fighting alongside the German and Austria
against Britain, France and Russia. Unfortunately, Turkish side defeated in
the War.
 The Treaty of Versailles decided to split Germany into two by creating a new
country Poland. Germans were asked to pay a huge sum to Victorious Allies.
 The same measures were taken against Austria also. The Treaty of Servers
(1920) was against Muslims and according to this Turkey was to be divided
amongst the victorious allies.
 If further said that Ottoman Empire was to be split up in a way that Arabia
was made independent, some parts of Turkey would be given under League of
Nations and the remaining Turkish land would be given to Greece.
 While Turkey’s only possession in Europe would be the areas around Istanbul.
 The British Prime Minister Lloyd George wanted to split Turkey also in the
same way they did with Germany & Austria.
 The Muslims of South Asia were angry at this decision & started to stop the
British doing any harm to Khilafat in Turkey.
 Muslims held the Caliphate of Turkey in high regard and were not prepared
to see Turkey split up after the War and thus the Caliph abolished.
 They expressed their views to the British government during the War who
promised that no harm would be done to the Caliphate.
 The Muslims of the world were anxious about the future of Turkey.

 It was the only region in the world where the Caliphate was in practice and
the Turkish ruler was known as the “Khalifa or Caliph” so the Muslims
wanted to save Khilafat in Turkey.
OTTOMAN EMPIRE CONTAIN HOLY PLACES
 The British and other successors wanted to destroy the Ottoman Empire
which contained many sacred places of the Muslims like Makkah, Madina&
Jerusalem or to convert Turkey to a nation than an empire.
 The Muslims were also anxious about Hajj and Umrah in case of division of
these sacred places.
TO PRESSURIZE BRITISH
 The Muslims of South Asia launched a movement to pressurize the British to

give independence to India by using this agitation because the British govt.
was having a weak position due to World War I and all the Hindus and the
Muslims were united due to Lucknow  Pact.
 Muslims and Hindus were united and Hindus saw this as the best opportunity
to drive british out of India.
MUSLIMS HAD A FEAR OF BRITISH
 Many Indian muslim leaders believed that the decline of Turkish empire
would have an adverse effect on the importance of indian Muslim community.
 And in future british may start treating them with disrespect.
 Therefore they encourage muslimsto launch khilafat movement in order to
protect their image and prestige.
MUSLIMS DON’T WANT TO FIGHT WITH MUSLIM BROTHERS
 It was clear that British would harm the turkey.

 So many muslims deserted the british army as they were not interested in
fighting with muslim brothers.
 In Islam, muslims are brothers of each other.
 This meant that they did not favour the british policy regardingTurkey.
 This same hatred took form of their opposition towards british as khilafat
movement.

N
TO REMIND BRITISH THEIR PROMISE
 British asked muslims to support them in first world war.

 British promised that if they won the war, they would not attack the turkey.
 However, after winning the war they forgot their promise and decided to
punish turkey.
 So to remind the promise they started this movement.
CONCERNS ABOUT BRITISH POLICIES
 Muslims distrusted British policies, especially after the First World War and
the Rowlatt Act and other legislation.
 They were concerned that the British were encouraging Muslims to fear the
Hindus so that Muslims would cooperate more with the British.

MUHA
They were also worried about how British rule in Afghanistan and Persia had
paid little attention to the views of Muslims there and were worried that the
same was happening in India. TREATY OF VERSAILLES
 The Treaty of Versailles decided to split Germany into two by creating

a new country Poland.
 Germans were asked to pay a huge some of Victorious Allies.
 The same measures were taken against Austria also.
TREATY OF SEVRES
 The Treaty of Sevres (1920) was against Muslims and according to this
Turkey was to be divided amongst the victorious allies.
 It further said that Ottoman Empire was to be split up in a way the
Arabia was made independent, some parts of Turkey would be given
under league of Nations and the remaining Turkish land would be given
to Greece.
 While Turkey’s only possession in Europe would be the areas around
Istanbul.
 The British Prime Minister Lloyd George wanted to split Turkey also in
the same way they did with Germany & Austria.
 The Muslims of South Asia were angry at this decision & started to
stop the British doing any harm to Khilafat in Turkey.
MAIN EVENTS
 The FIRST KHILAFAT CONFERENCE was held on 23rd November 1919 at
Delhi and Maulvi Fazal-ul-Haq emphasized in his presidential address that
support of non-muslims should be enlisted in this issue.
 After this meeting, the main purpose was to convince the British not to take
any action against Turkey.
 At the end of this conference a resolution was passed which decided to send
a delegation to England to show the strength of this movement.

N
 A “KHILAFAT COMMITTEE” was organized in the first step of the

movement & Maulana Shaukat Ali was nominated as Secretary, Congress also
assured its full support in this moment and Abul Kalam Azad represented it.
Congress also agreed to boycott British goods and adopting a policy of
noncooperation against the British.
 Gandhi also approved a passive resistance called SATYAGRAYA.
 The SECOND KHILAFAT CONFERENCE was held in the AMRITSAR on 28th
December 1919, where both the parties (Khilafat Movement and
Noncooperation movement) planned for the future.
 It was agreed to merge all the political groups & Gandhi was made the leader
of these groups.
 KHILAFAT DELEGATION left for England led by Maulana Mohammad Ali
Johar to meet the Prime Minister Lloyd George.
 It was totally useless because the Prime Minister refused to accept any
proposal of the Khilafat Delegation and it failed without its desired results.
 Gandhi took a tour of India & both the Hindus & the Muslims started
NONCOPERATION MOVEMENT against the British govt.
 The THIRD KHILAFAT CONFERENCE was held in Karachi from 9-11 July, in
which services with police and army were termed Haram. The Indians were
convinced to give up Govt. services, give back titles, boycott courts and
British goods, and resign from local bodies not to attend schools and
colleges. After this resolution many Indian leaders were arrested including
Ali brothers. Jinnah had already predicted that it might be violent & the
same thing happened in
 Nilambar & Tirur where police stations were set on fire. After this
conference the prominent political leaders were arrested.
 About 30,000 Indian political leaders were arrested till the end of 1921.
 Gandhi convinced the people of Congress that with the help of this
movement they would be able to get “Swaraj or Self-rule” in a year.
 The Congress decided to exploit Muslim agitation to pressurize the British
for the self-rule and to prove that the Hindu-Muslim unity was the need of
time.

MUHA
 Jinnah totally rejected Gandhi’s non-cooperation; he thought that it could

not be run in a non-violent way so, as a protest he resigned from Congress in
1920.
 In August 1920, Abul Kalam Azad and Maulana Abdul Bari started HIJRAT
MOVEMENT and asked the Muslims to migrate to a place where they could
practice Islam freely.
 Nearly 18,000 Muslims migrated to Afghanistan.
The Afghan govt. welcome them in the beginning but afterwards refused to
accept them. Many people died in the way due to hard areas and those who
returned back to India could not have jobs, and shelter.
 As a result of this all the Muslims became more backward in all the fields of
life.
 This migration to Afghanistan is known as the, “HIJRAT MOVEMENT” in
the history.
 In February 1922 CHAURA CHURI INCIDENT a village near UP a dispute
originated between the police and the demonstrating people. The excited
people killed 21 policemen when they fired on the political procession. Gandhi
was shocked to hear this and withdrew his support from the non-cooperation
movement, which was destruction to the Khilafat movement.
 Gandhi was arrested and sentenced to 6 years imprisonment.
 When Maulana Muhammad Ali Johar and other leaders were released from
jail in 1924 they saw a horrible picture of the Muslims & country.
 Mohammad Ali Johar declared India as “Dar-ul-Harb means Home of
War”.
FAILURE OF KHILAFAT MOVEMENT

HIJRAT MOVEMENT
 Thousands of Muslims migrated to Afghanistan in a religious protest against

the British government.
 The Afghan government was hostile to the migrants and refused to allow all
the refugees to settle.
 Many of those who returned to India died on the journey back or found
themselves homeless and jobs occupied, which dispirited the Muslims.

N
 The Hijrat Movement at a critical situation was another blow for this
movement at a wrong time.
 The Muslims were shocked to see the attitude of Afghan govt. on the other
hand the Muslim leaders wanted the local people to stay in India& fight
against the British while they were leaving.
 As people became backward socially and economically so they did not support
khilafat movement which further weakens the strength of khilafat
movement.
ABOLISHEMENT OF KHILAFAT
 The members of Khilafat Movement were more concerned with the fate of
Khalifa than were the Western powers & the people of Turkey.
The biggest reason was that in 1922 Sultan Mehmud VI was deprived of his
power in Turkey and after 2 years Mustafa Kamal Attaturk formed a
nationalist govt. & exiled the Khalifa.
 Now there was no reason to carry khilafat movement.
BETRAYAL OF GANDHI
 In Chaura Chauri incident 21 policemen were killed due to which Gandhi

called off his support.
 Betrayal of Gandhi on the very crucial stage nears the victory because he
was having his aim of self-rule while the Muslims were much concerned with
Khilafat.
 He was the leader of the groups and without him it was difficult to continue
the movement.
IGNORANCE OF QUAID’S SUGGESTION
 Quaid’s suggested not to start the non-cooperation movement as there will

be violence due to which Khilafat movement will never be successful in their
mission
 His suggestion was totally ignored by AIML & INC.
 The incident of Chaura Chauri and other incidents proved that Quaid was
correct in his opinion.
 The violence worsened the position of Khilafat movement

CHAURA CHAURI INCIDENT
 The non-cooperation movement was started at a wrong time.

 Burning of 21 policemen in ChauraChori incident which made it violent.
 After the non-cooperation movement almost all the prominent leaders of the
Congress & Muslim league were in jail so the Indians were running it in a
rebel way so poor leadership also caused problems.
LACK OF COMMON OBJECTIVE
 Khilafat movement and non-cooperation movement started simultaneously.

 Both movements were working together but with different intentions.
 Khilafat movement was started to save Ottoman Empire.  Non-
cooperation was started to get self rule.

MUHA
MOPLAH UPRISING
 Moplahs were deeply religious Muslims who rose up against their Hindu
landlords and the British in South India.
 Their activities destroyed a police station and Hindu Properties.
 This action divided Hindus and Muslims and put in doubt Hindu cooperation in
the movement.
DELHI PROPOSALS
 Mohammed Ali Jinnah called a conference of all Muslim leaders in Delhi in
1927 to discuss the future of constitutional reforms.

 Muslim league wanted to secure the position of muslims in upcoming

constitutional reforms.
 The main demands were known as the Delhi Proposals:
• Separation of Sindh from Bormbay.
• Full power & provincial status for the Frontier Province and Baluchistan.
• Muslims should be given more seats in Punjab and Bengal according to
their population.
• If the Muslims would be given one-third of the seats in the Central
Legislature then the Muslims League would give up demand of separate
electorate.
SIMON COMMISSION
WHY IT WAS SENT?
 It was expected by the Conservative govt. that in case the Labour party wins
the elections in UK they might give many concessions to the Indians so 2
years early the British government sent a delegation consisted of 7 British
members led by Sir John Simon 1927.

MUHA
 It was sent to solve the problem of communal tension between the Hindus &
the Muslims because there were many disagreements of the previous
reforms.
 In Montague-Chelmsford reforms they promised to announce more reforms
in 10 years so it was a continuity of the British policies to introduce new
reforms within 10 years.
SIMON COMMISSION
 In 1927 british government announced to send a seven member commission

under the chairmanship of Sir John Simon to prepare the report for new
reforms.
 The delegation paid two prolonged visits to India.
 First one from 3rd February to 31st March, 1928 and second one was from 11
October to 13 April, 1929.
 The commission had no Indian member.
 Its report was published in 1930 known as Simon Report  The main
proposals were:
• It abolished Diarchy & introduced federal form of govt. with provincial
autonomy
• Separate electorates were kept for the minorities but the Muslims were
not given one-third seats in the Central Legislature.
• Sindh remained a part of Bombay.
• Special status was given to NWFP province & not the provincial status.
RESULTS OF SIMON COMMISSION
 The Congress did not accept these proposals because of federal form of
govt. separate electorate for minorities & provincial autonomy. Congress
raised slogans of Simon Go Back. Congress started civil-disobedience
movement against british government in 1930 which led to arrest of
thousands of congresss supporters.
 Muslim League rejected it because Sindh was not separated from Bombay,
NWFP & Baluchistan were not given provincial status and the Muslims were
not given one-third seats. Muslim league did not joint non-cooperation
movement.

 In the meantime there took place a change of british government and new
government assured Indian that no constitutional reforms would be
introduced in India without taking Indian into confidence.
NEHRU REPORT
WHY IT WAS ISSUED?

MUHA
 It was issued to the rejection of the Simon Commission proposals because it

did not fulfil demands of Congress. Since it abolished Diarchy, introduced
Federal form of govt. and minorities were given separate electorate so they
issued it. The Congress wanted more concessions for the Hindus but the
British govt. did not wish to do it.
 The Congress leaders organized an all parties Conference regarding the
Constitutional reforms to be introduced in India. It reported on the future
of the Sub-Continent by looking to dominion status with no need for
separate electorates. They wanted to control power under Congress so they
refused to accept the rights of other minorities.
 This totally alienated the Muslims and marked the end of any future
cooperation between them and the Congress because they totally denied
their rights. They broke all the promises of Lucknow Pact and even denied
the right of separate electorate. It was a part of Congress agenda to give
less power and rights to the Muslims.
 It was also a response of the comments of Lord Birkenhead that Congress
was an immature party & could not frame a constitution.
NEHRU REPORT
 In 1928 members of Congress, League, Liberals, Hindu Muhasba, Sikh League

& so on met in All-Party Conference to frame the future constitution.
 The Muslims were also called for this but in the committee they had nominal
representation.
 Moti Lal Nehru chaired the meeting and devised the constitution known as
“Nehru Report” with the recommendations:
• A responsible govt. on the basis of self-governing dominion to be
formed.
• Separate electorates should not be given to the minorities & through
joint electorate reserved seats should be given according to population.
• The departments such as foreign affairs, army and defense should be
controlled by parliament and Viceroy.
• A Unitary form to government in Center& India to be a federation with
two-chamber parliament.
• Hindi should be given the status of official language.
• Men and women and all religions should have equal rights.
• The voting right for all adult men and women.

• Separation of Sindh from Bombay & full provincial status for NWFP and
Baluchistan.
 Jinnah proposed three amendments, which were:
• In the central Legislature, one-third representation for the Muslims.
• In the Punjab and Bengal Muslim representation on the basis of
population.
• Main powers should be given to Central govt. but the remaining powers
should be given to provinces.
 The Congress rejected all these amendments.
 The Nehru report ended any future cooperation between the Congress and
the Muslim League.
 It is considered as the turning point between the Hindu-Muslim relations.
Whatever they had accepted in the Lucknow pact, they even rejected all
those agreements.
 So, the Muslims could not trust the Hindus anymore because they had been
betrayed several times.
WHY ALL INDIA MUSLIM CONFERENCE REJECTED NEHRU

REPORT? [7]
 The report ignored the views of Muslims.

 Congress had gone back on the view of having separate electorates
established at Lucknow in 1916.
 There was no room for automatic Muslim representation in the
parliament which the Muslim League wanted.
 Muslims were against Hindi being the official language of India and
therefore saw no future in their relationship with Hindus.
 The Muslim League foresaw that the Punjab and Bengal was in danger
of not having adult suffrage and so wanted seats to be reserved for
Muslims on a population basis.

MUHA
JINNAH 14 POINTS
WHY DID JINNAH ISSUED 14 POINTS?
IN RESPONSE OF SIMON COMMISSION
 Simon Commission did not accept the demands of muslims such as Provincial
status for NWFP, separation of Sindh from Bombay, and Muslims were not
given 1/3rd seats in Central Legislature.
 So in response of Simon commission Jinnah issued his 14 points.
IN RESPONSE OF NEHRU REPORT
 Although the Nehru Report has been drawn up by an All Party Conference
but therewere many points in that which were against the Muslims.
 Nehru report proposed unitary form of govt which means they wanted Hindu
Raj.
 It also proposed Hindi as official language which was against muslims as urdu
was associated with AIML.
 It also rejected separate electorate for Muslims which was the main demand
of muslims.
 Jinnah wanted amendments which were not accepted by Nehru.
 So in response of Nehru Report, in1929 Jinnah gave his own formula for the
constitutional reforms.
TO PROTECT AND SAFEGUARD THE RIGHTS & INTERESTS OF MUSLIMS
 Jinnah gave his 14 points in order to protect and safeguard the rights &
interests of muslims.
 These demands covered all aspects of Muslims interests at that time.
 The demands were also to form the basis of the Muslims demands for a
separate homeland.
 It also convinced them that the Hindus and Muslims were two separate
nations.
 So in the shadow of 14 points they held Allahabad address for the demand
of a separate homeland for the Muslims.

14 POINTS
 In 1929 Quaid-e-Azam decided to give its own formula for the constitutional
reforms.
 He convinced the meeting of AIML in Delhi and gave his famous 14 Points
formula.
Federal System
The form of the future constitution should be federal with the residuary
powers rested in the provinces.
Provincial Autonomy
A uniform measure of autonomy shall be granted to all provinces.
Representation of Minorities
All legislative in the country and other elected bodies shall be constituted on
the definite principles of adequate and effective representation of
minorities in every province without reducing the majority in any province to
a minority or even equality.
Number of Muslim Representative
In the central legislative, Muslims representative shall be not less than
onethird.
Separate Electorates
A representative of communal groups shall continue to be by means of
separate electorates as at present provided it shall be open to any
community, at any time to abandon its separate electorate in favor of joint
electorate.
Muslim Majority Provinces
Any territorial re-distribution that might at any time be necessary shall not
in any way, affect the Muslim majority in Punjab, Bengal, and N.W.F.P.
Religious Liberty
Full religious Liberty, liberty of belief, worship and observance, association
and education shall be guaranteed to all the communication.
Three-Fourth Representation
No bill or resolution shall be passed in any legislative or any other elected
body if three-fourths of the members of any community in that particular
body oppose such a bill.
Separation of Sindh
Sindh should be separated from the Bombay Presidency.

MUHA
Introduction of Reforms in N.W.F.P and Baluchistan

Reforms should be introduced in the North-West Frontier Province and
Balochistan on the same footing as in other provinces.
Government Services
Muslims should be given adequate share along with other Indians in the
services of State.
Protection of Muslim's culture and Language
The Constitution should embody adequate safeguards for the protection of
Muslim culture and for the protection and promotion of Muslim education,
language, religion and personal laws and Muslim charitable institutions and
for their due share in the grants-in-aid given by the State and by local
selfgoverning bodies.
One-Third Muslim Ministers
No cabinet, either central or provincial be formed without being a proportion
of at least one-third Muslim Ministers.
Constitution
No change shall be made in the constitution of the state except with the
concurrence of State constituting the Indian Federation.
IMPORTANCE
 A comparison of the Nehru Report with the Quaid-e-Azam's Fourteen Points

shows that the political gap between the Muslims and the Hindus had really
widened.
 The importance of these points can be judged by the fact that these points
were presented in the Round Table Conference of 1930.
 Those points made it clear to Hindus and British Government that Muslims
wanted their own identity without influence by Hindus.
 Fourteen points of Quaid-e-Azam became principles for Muslims of India.
 These points made it clear to Hindus and British Government that Muslims
of India will not bear any influence from Hindus or British Government.
 Fourteen Points not only revived Muslim League but also directed them on a
new way.
 These points prepared the Muslims of India for a bold step to struggle for
freedom.

 These points became the demands of the Muslims and greatly influenced the
Muslims thinking for the next two decades till the establishment of Pakistan
in 1947.
ALLAHABAD ADDRESS
 Muslim League held its annual session at Allahabad in 1930 which was
presided by Dr Muhammad Allama Iqbal.
 He delivered a speech which is commonly known as Allahabad address of
Allama Iqbal.
 Here he presented the idea of separate homeland for Muslims which was
ultimately realized in the form of Pakistan.
 Allama Iqbal explained the historical background of hindus and muslims. He
explained that India was a continent of humans who belonged to different
races, languages and religions.
 He also pointed out, there would not be peace in the country unless there is
proper place for muslims as a separate nation since muslims have totally
different culture.
 He proposed separate homeland for muslims. While defining te area. He
stated Punjab, NWFP, Sindh and Baluchistan should be in muslim state with
or without british rule.
IMPORTANCE
 This address laid the foundation of Pakistan Movement which was further
supported by leaders like ChaudryRahmat Ali and Jinnah.
 It clarified the confusions in minds of muslims about their political future.
It completely said that Muslims and Hindus are two different nations with
different culture, religion and languages and they can’t live together. This
set a target for muslims that now they have to fight on their own under the
platform of AIML.

MUHA
 This brought unity amongst muslims as all muslim leaders came on one
platform and supported the idea of Allama Muhammad Iqbal.
 This also brought political awareness among muslims that now they can’t
work with Congress after the Nehru report. It was also a guide for upcoming
muslim political leaders.
WHY ALLAMA IQBAL WAS ASKED TO CHAIR THE ADDRESS?
 He was a well-respected, authoritative figure and had the confidence of

Muslims and the first important Muslim leader to advocate the partition of
India and the creation of a separate Muslim state.
 He was opposed to British control of India – as the concept of conquest went
against Muslim beliefs. This strengthened his view of the creation of a
separate homeland, independent of the British.
 He persuaded many Muslims that the Muslim League had to build an
effective mass political party to challenge the domination of the Congress.
He had inspired and spoke for many in the Muslim League.
 He was suitable, educated and was the best leader as Jinnah was not yet
ready to accept the Two Nation Theory.
 His poetry awakened a sense of nationhood among Muslims and he urged
them to be active in making progress, so he was respected.

ROUND TABLE CONFERENCES (1930-

32)
WHY WERE THREE ROUND TABLE CONFERENCES HELD?
TO DRAFT AN INDIAN CONSTITUTION IN SUPPORT OF INDIAN
POLITICAL PARTIES
 The Indians had opposed the Simon Commission but a report was still
produced.
 The recommendations of Simon Commission could not satisfy the demands of
the political parties of India.
 The British decided that a RTC should be held in order to discuss the
Commission’s recommendations on the future government of India.
 British wanted to draft an Indian constitution in support of Indian Political
Parties.
FIRST R.T.C FAILED
 It was realized that without the attendance of the Congress in the first
RTC little progress on the future of the Sub-Continent could be achieved.
 As congress was the major party of India so British thought imposing a
constitution without their acceptance will result in violence which can cause
danger to British rule.
 So in order to that British decided to held second RTC.
 Lord Irwin met Gandhi and made progress so that another Round Table
Conference could be held.

MUHA
SECOND R.T.C FAILED

 In second RTC Gandhi took a hard line refusing to recognize the problem of
the minorities and also claiming to represent the Congress alone which he
said spoke for the whole of India.
 The Conference broke up amidst threats that the British would impose a
solution if agreement couldn’t be reached.
 It was then agreed that a third conference would be held.
 The British govt. wanted to reach on a common agreement about the future
constitution of India so they tried their best to conduct three conferences.
FIRST ROUND TABLE CONFERENCE
 The First RTC was held from November 1930 to January 1931.
 It was chaired by British Prime minister Ramsey MacDonald.
 Except congress, leading leaders of different political parties of India and
nationalities and princes of the princely states were invited.
 Congress declared that it would attend the conference only if it was given
the assurance that the Nehru report would be enforced in totality as the
constitution of India. They also refused to attend unless there was a
guarantee that anything agreed at conference would be implemented.
 British govt denied to accept their wish.
 So Congress boycotted First RTC and started a civil disobedience movement.
 Under this civil disobedience movement, protests were held, british goods
were boycotted, and it was decided not to pay taxes.
 The british govt reacted strongly by arresting thousands of congress
supporters including Gandhi and Nehru.
 From the muslims side, Sir Agha Khan was the head of delegation and other
prominent members were Jinnah, Muhammad Ali, Sir Muhammad Sahfi and
others.
SUCCESSES
 Govt approved federal system for India and it was a great achievement and
was first step towards self-rule.
 Responsible govt in provinces.
 Sindh was given separate identity as province.
 Princely states agreed to join All India Federation.

FAILURES
 Congress (Major Party) was absent. Without it no agreement could be

reached.
 Deadlock on federal system.
 Minorities could not reach a conclusion.
GANDHI-IRWIN PACT
 To ensure Congress participation in second round table conference, british
govt directed Viceroy Lord Irwin to make efforts in this regard.
 As a result Lord Irwin made a pact with Gandhi in March 1931 known as
Gandhi-Irwin pact.
 It was very difficult for the British govt. to reach an agreement without the
Congress, so they tried to their best to convince the Congress to attend the
2nd RTC.
 The non-cooperation movement of Gandhi could not get the desired results
and he himself wanted to attend the 2nd RTC.
 Gandhi was looking for an appropriate occasion that the Viceroy Lord Irwin
sent him an invitation for talks.
 Finally, pact was signed between both the leaders with the proposals that
the Congress would end its civil disobedience movement & attend 2 nd Round
Table Conference.
 That the British government would take all ordinances back against Congress
& release all persons arrested during the civil disobedience movement.
SECOND ROUND TABLE CONFERENCE
 Second RTC held from September 1931 to December 1931.

 It was very important occasion because almost all the political parties of
India were present during this conference.
 Muslim League team was led by Jinnah &Allama Iqbal.
 At this time Gandhi rejected to accept the rights of minorities of India &
claimed himself as the sole representative of all the Indians.
 This was totally rejected by the govt. as well as by the Jinnah who tried his
best to prove that the Muslims were a separate nation from any definition of
nation in the world.
 After this Gandhi adopted a very rude and unreasonable behavior.

 He quietly observed the conference & did not give any suggestion on various
matters discussed.
 So, the Gandhi was not agreed to accept the rights of minorities & due to his
attitude there was no settlement of various issues, which could be settled
easily.
SUCCESSES
 Congress attended it.

 NWFP & Sindh would be given by the status of provinces with their own
Governors.
 Minorities entered into an agreement.
FAILURES
 Rude& Stubborn behaviour of Gandhi.

 Minorities issue unresolved.
 The Labour party was not so strong due to a coalition govtwhich was least,
concerned with any settlement in India. The new British national government
was less keen to reach a compromise in India.
COMMUNAL AWARD
 The British government gave enough time and chance to Indian leaders to
come up with a workable constitutional setup, after vainly waiting British
Prime Minister Ramsey Macdonald published their own scheme known as
“Communal Award” in 1932 at the end of second RTC.
 It retained separate electorate for the Muslims and all other minorities.
 This award also separated Sindh from Bombay province.
 It also awarded muslims more seats than their population in Hindu Majority
provinces.
 Similarly, It also awarded hindus more seats than their population in Muslim
Majority provinces.
 The Congress was not happy with this award because the Muslims were given
separate electorate & seats.
 Since Muslim League was called by the British govt so they had to accept it
and this was favorable for muslims as well so they accepted it.

MUHA
THIRD ROUND TABLE CONFERENCE
 The third RTC was held in London from November 1932 to December 1932.
 The 3rd RTC was just a formality because only 46 delegates attended it.
 Jinnah did not attend his conference because he was sick of the political
situation of India, he wasn’t properly invited & his wife had died.
 Sir Agha Khan led the Muslim League.
 After 2nd RTC Gandhi came back & started civil disobedience movement
again.
 Gandhi and Nehru were imprisoned due to their movement against the govt.
 Lord Irwin was replaced with Lord Willington who was less aware of the
problems & solutions of India and was not in favor of giving Indians any
political freedom.
FAILURES
 Congress and league didn’t attended the conference.

 Lord Irwin was replaced with Lord Willington who was less aware of the
problems & solutions of India and was not in favor of giving Indians any
political freedom.
CONCLUSION
 I agree that the three RTC’s achieved little & the British govt. could not
achieve its desired results on the spot but they were very successful
afterwards.
 The govt. knew the problems & demands of the major parties of India, which
was a positive feature of these conferences.
 The govt. kept those demands in their minds for their future decisions,
which was reflected in the Govt. of India Act 1935.


Section 2 Notes, New

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Section 2 Notes, New

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Section 2 Notes, New

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MUHA

+92 317 2631567 connectwithmym@gmail.com www.muhammadyousufmemon.com

WHY PARTITION WAS DONE?

BENGAL WAS MOST DENSELY POPULATED PROVINCE

TO GIVE RELAXATION TO MUSLIMS

OLEVEL PAK STUDIES I 2059/01 I SECTION 2 I NOTES

TO BREAK THE POWER OF CONGRESS

TO DEVELOP EAST BENGAL

 According to british, partition will result in equal development throughout

 As Bengal was densely populated province so different communities were

DIVIDE AND RULE POLICY

OLEVEL PAK STUDIES I 2059/01 I SECTION 2 I NOTES

HOW BRITISH REACTED TO HINDU-LED PROTESTS?

OLEVEL PAK STUDIES I 2059/01 I SECTION 2 I NOTES

ATTEMPT TO ASSASSINATE LORD MINTO

OLEVEL PAK STUDIES I 2059/01 I SECTION 2 I NOTES

ANNOUNCEMENT BY BRITISH ABOUT NEW REFORMS

OLEVEL PAK STUDIES I 2059/01 I SECTION 2 I NOTES

IMPORTANCE OF SIMLA DELEGATION

DEMAND OF SEPARATE ELECTORATE WAS ACCEPTED

 The Muslim demands for separate representation, election by only Muslim

OLEVEL PAK STUDIES I 2059/01 I SECTION 2 I NOTES

IMPROVE RELATIONS BETWEEN MUSLIMS AND BRITISH

 This resulted in a sudden upturn in Muslim-British relations and helped to

PROVIDED MUSLIMS CONFIDENCE

 It also guaranteed Muslims an independent role in the political process and

OLEVEL PAK STUDIES I 2059/01 I SECTION 2 I NOTES

ALL INDIA MUSLIM LEAGUE

INC WAS A HINDU ORGANIZATION

TO ORGANIZE AND UNITE THE MUSLIMS

 By not organizing a Muslim group they would continue to be disorganized and

OLEVEL PAK STUDIES I 2059/01 I SECTION 2 I NOTES

TO PROTECT THE RELIGIOUS RIGHTS OF MUSLIMS

TO IMPROVE RELATIONS BETWEEN MUSLIMS AND BRITISH

SUCCESS OF SIMLA DELEGATION

EDUCATIONAL AND ECONOMICAL BACKWARDNESS

OLEVEL PAK STUDIES I 2059/01 I SECTION 2 I NOTES

 Hindus protested against the partition of Bengal

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

 To save the interests of Muslims of sub-continent and no convey their

OLEVEL PAK STUDIES I 2059/01 I SECTION 2 I NOTES

MORLEY MINTO REFORMS

MORLEY MINTO REFORMS

OLEVEL PAK STUDIES I 2059/01 I SECTION 2 I NOTES

WHY CONGRESS OPPOSE MORLEY MINTO REFORMS?

OLEVEL PAK STUDIES I 2059/01 I SECTION 2 I NOTES

NO SELF RULE WAS GRANTED

DEMAND OF SEPARATE ELCTORATES BY MUSLIMS ACCEPTED BY

 The British accepted the right of Muslims to have separate electorates,

INDIANS WERE ADVISORS ONLY

 Indian legislature had no control over the executive legislature.

MUSLIMS GAIN CONTROL ON HIGH POSTS

TO REVERSE THE PARTITION OF BENGAL

OLEVEL PAK STUDIES I 2059/01 I SECTION 2 I NOTES

STEPS TAKEN BY BRITISH WERE ANTI-MUSLIM

 In 1911 partition of Bengal reversed which was an anti-Muslim step  In

OLEVEL PAK STUDIES I 2059/01 I SECTION 2 I NOTES

BRITISH WERE NOT ABLE TO FULFILL THE DEMANDS OF HINDUS

JINNAH WANTED HINDU-MUSLIM UNITY