Number System Text Book 8th STD Vol 1
Number System Text Book 8th STD Vol 1
Number System Text Book 8th STD Vol 1
MATHEMATICS
Number systems 1
A number system is a method of writing numerals to represent numbers.
The most common system for number representation is the decimal. Everybody is using it. It’s so
common than most people must believe that is the only one. It’s used in finances, engineering, and
biology, almost everywhere we see and use numbers.
If someone is asking you to think at a number for sure you’ll think at a decimal number. If you think at a
binary or hexadecimal one, you must have an extreme passion for arithmetic or software/programming.
As the name is saying the decimal number system is using 10 symbols/characters. In Latin language 10 is
“decem” so decimal might be linked to the Latin word.
As you can see there are 10 symbols from 0 to 9. With these symbols we can construct all the numbers in
the decimal system.
All the numbers in the decimal system can be constructed by using the above mentioned symbols (0 … 9)
multiplied with the power of 10. The power of ten gives us ones, tens, hundreds, thousands and so on.
The example below breaks down the decimal number 67049 into powers of 10 multiplied with numbers
between 0 and 9. This is just to show that any number in the decimal system can be decomposed into a
sum of terms made of from the product of the power of 10 and the symbols 0 … 9.
The binary system is used wherever you want to store information in electronic format. All the computers
that you know, intelligent devices, everything that has to do with electronics and microcontrollers use the
binary system.
In electronics (digital) all the operations are done using two levels of voltage: high and low. Each level of
voltage is assigned to a value/symbol: HIGH for 1 and LOW for 0. For a microcontroller which is
supplied with +5V the 1 (high) will be represented by +5 V and the 0 (low) by 0 V.
Roughly we can say that the binary system is used because it can be translated in electronic signal.
All the decimal numbers we can think of can be represented into binary symbols. We do this by using a
sum between terms of the power of 2 multiplied with 0 or 1.
As example we’ll use the number 149 (decimal representation) and transform it into binary
representation. We could use any number but if it’s too big it would end up into a long string of zeros and
ones.
As you can see the decimal number 149 is represented in binary system by a series of zeros and ones
(10010101). Usually to distinguish between a decimal or binary number we must specify the base to which
we are referring to. The base is described as a subscript after the last character of the number.
By specifying the base of the number we eliminate the probability of confusion, because the same
representation (e.g. 11) can mean different things for different bases.
Octal (base 8)
All the numbers in the octal system are represented using 8 symbols/characters, from 0 to 7. The reason of
using the octal system instead of the decimal one can be various. One of them is that instead of using our
fingers for counting, we use the spaces between fingers.
Humans have 4 spaces between the fingers of one hand; in total we’ll have 8 spaces, for both hands. In
this case it makes sense to use an octal number representation system instead of a decimal one. The
drawback is that higher numbers will require more characters compared to the decimal one.
To transform a decimal represented number into an octal system we split it into terms containing the
power of 8:
As an example we are going to represent the decimal number 67049 in octal base:
To represent a decimal number in hexadecimal format we split the decimal number into a sum of terms.
Each term is a product between a hexadecimal symbol and a power of 16.
The representation of the decimal number 67049 in hexadecimal format is 105E9. Similar to the binary
system a common practice is to use the prefix “0x” in order to distinguish from the decimal notation.
We stop here as the number has been reduced to zero and collect the remainders in reverse order. Answer
= 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 Note: the answer is read from bottom (MSB, most significant bit) to top (LSB least significant
bit) as (1000100)2 .
Natural Numbers: It is the simplest subset of the set of all numbers. Counting Numbers are known as
Natural Numbers. N = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5 .....}
As seen over here, it is obvious that 1 is the smallest natural number. But is there something called the
biggest natural number? Is it possible that the set of natural numbers is finite? Let us find out.
Problem: Prove that there are infinite Natural Numbers in this world.
Proof: Assume that the set of natural numbers is finite. Then, there will be the largest number among the
elements in this finite set. Let this be ‘M’. By definition, N = {1, 2, 3 ..... M}
But, as M is a natural number, even the number M+1 is a natural number. And M+1 > M.
Hence, we come across a contradiction that M is the largest natural number. Thus, our assumption that
the set of natural numbers is finite is wrong.
It is interesting to note that, even though any element that you pick from the set of natural numbers is
finite, the total number of elements in the whole set is infinite.
Whole Numbers: All natural numbers, along with the 0 form the set of whole numbers.
W = {0, 1, 2, 3....}
Integers: All natural numbers, 0 and the negative of all natural numbers form the set of integers.
Z = {.... -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3....}
As we know that there exists no biggest natural number i.e. biggest integer, it is also evident that there
exists no number which is the smallest integer.
Activity:
Prove that the number of integers isn’t greater than the number of natural numbers
(Hint 1: Generally while comparing two sets, you make sure that every element in set 1 has a
corresponding partner in set 2. For example, say you are at an open house in school where each child has
to bring one parent along with him. To confirm that the number of children = number of adults, we check
whether each student has a corresponding parent and vice versa. Try to form a similar relation here)
Ordering: We can order any two numbers on this number line as follows: given two different numbers,
the number to the left is less than the number to the right. Similarly, the number to the right is greater than
the number to the left.
For example, -3 lies to the left of 2 on the line and so -3 is less than 2. Since 2 lies to the right of -3, 2 is
greater than -3. In the same way, 4 is greater than 1 and -4 is less than 1.
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
We use the symbol ‘<’ to write ‘less than’ and ‘>’ for ‘greater than’. So “-3 is less than 2” is written as -3 < 2
and “4 is greater than 1” is written as 4 > 1. This notation is also used when one (or both) of the numbers
is a variable quantity. For example, the statement “x is less than 9” is written as x < 9.
The table below gives statements expressing the different possible relations between two numbers, along
with their mathematical representation:
Operations on Integers: We will study how to add, subtract, multiply and divide any two integers.
Examples:
Represent the below operations on the number lines given and describe the movement (left or right by x)
(a) 8 – 11 = –3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) –5 + 6 = 1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(c) 7 + (–2) = 5
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(d) 5 – (–3) = 8
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rules:
1) To add two positive integers, find their sum and give this sum the positive sign.
2) To add two negative integers, find the sum of their absolute values, and give this sum a negative
sign.
Conclusion
• The sum of two positive integers is positive.
• The sum of two negative integers is negative.
• The sum of a positive integer and a negative integer
a) is positive, if the greater integer (absolute value) is positive and
b) is negative, if the greater integer (absolute value) is negative.
Multiplication of Integers:
To multiply 2 integers, first find the product of the two numbers and the sign of the product may be
assigned as follows
• If both integers are positive, the product is positive.
• If both integers are negative, the product is positive, because of (–) x (–) = (+)
• If one integer is positive, another negative, then the product is negative.
Division of Integers:
The division of 2 integers is the same as the division of other numbers, but the sign may be assigned as
below:
• If a positive integer is divided by a negative integer or a negative integer is divided by a positive
integer in both cases, the quotient is negative.
• If a negative integer is divided by a negative integer, or a positive integer is divided by a positive
integer, the quotient is positive.
Properties
• Sum (difference) of two even numbers is an even number.
• The product of two even numbers is an even number.
• Sum (difference) of two odd numbers is an even number.
• The product of two odd numbers is an odd number.
You may remember these properties using the following table.
We can represent the gcd of two numbers, say x and y as gcd(x, y). Hence gcd(6, 9) = gcd(9, 6) = 3.
Before we get to the theorem, we learn a new notation. Say a number ‘a’, divides another number ‘b’. We
can write this mathematically as a | b. So, from now, whenever we say that a divides b, we can write a | b.
Theorem: If a and b are two positive integers such that a = bq + r, r 0 and a > b, then the gcd of a and b is
equal to the gcd of b and r.
i.e. gcd(a,b) = gcd(b,r)
Proof:
We will show that if a = bq + r, then an integer d is a common divisor of a and b if, and only if, d is a
common divisor of b and r.
Let d be a common divisor of a and b.
=> d|a and d|b
=> d|(a − bq) (As a common factor of 2 numbers a and bq is also a factor of their difference)
=> d|r (Since r = a – bq)
Thus if d is a common divisor of a and b it is also a common divisor of b and r. ..(1)
Now let d is a common divisor of b and r. Applying similar arguments as in the previous case,
=> d|b and d|r
=> d|(bq + r)
=> d|a.
Therefore, if d is a common divisor of b and r, d must be a common divisor of a and b.
Thus, the set of common divisors of a and b are the same as the set of common divisors of b and r.
The greatest number in the set of divisors of a and b is gcd(a, b). And in the set of divisors of b and r is
gcd(b, r). But since we have proved that the set of divisors of a and b is the same as the set of divisors of b
and r, the greatest number in both the sets are equal.
Note (2): LCM (Least common multiple) of two numbers a and b can be found by using the formula
LCM x HCF = a x b
Example: Find the HCF of 250 and 30
Solution: By using Euclid’s division algorithm, we get
250 = 30 x 8 + 10
Hence, gcd(250, 30) = gcd(30, 10)
Again by using Euclid’s division algorithm, we get
30 = 10 x 3 + 0
Here, we notice the remainder is zero and we cannot proceed further.
The divisor at this stage is 10.
The gcd(30, 10) is 10, and gcd(30, 10) = gcd(250, 30), and hence, gcd(250, 30) = 10.
The HCF of 250 and 30 is 10.
It can be verified by listing out all the factors of 250 and 30.
Example : Show that every positive even integer is of the form 2n and every positive odd integer is of the
form 2n + 1.
Solution : For any integer x and y = 2, x = 2n + r where n 0
But 0 r < 2
r = 0 or 1
When r = 0, x = 2n.
x is a positive even integer.
When r = 1, x = 2n + 1.
x is a positive odd integer.
Now work backwards from the last but one equation in the following manner.
18 = 72 – 54 x 1
18 = 72 – [270 – 72 x 3] x 1 = 72 x 4 – 270 x 1
18 = [342 – 270 x 1] x 4 – 270 x 1 = 342 x 4 – 270 x 5
18 = 342 x 4 – [612 – 342] x 5 = 612 x (-5) + 342 x (9)
a = -5 and b = 9
Also, note that this a and b are not unique. We can find more combinations of a and b in the following
manner by adding and subtracting the product of the given two numbers.
18 = 612 x (-5) + 342 x 9 + 612 x 342 – 612 x 342
18 = 612 x (337) + 342 x (-603)
Note: In general, a = p1 x p2 x p3…pn where p1, p2, p3 …… pn are primes in ascending order.
Question
Let n = 27 ⋅ 3𝑎 ⋅ 116 also n = 2𝑏 ⋅ 35 ⋅ 11𝑐 then find a, b, c.
Theorem 1: if n is a perfect square then the index of all primes in the canonical prime factorisation of n is a
multiple of 2. In other words, let n = b2 and n = 𝑝1 𝑛1 𝑝2 𝑛2 𝑝3 𝑛3 .... 𝑝𝑘−1 𝑛𝑘−1 𝑝𝑘 𝑛𝑘 , then each of
𝑛1 , 𝑛2 , 𝑛3 … , 𝑛𝑘−1 , 𝑛𝑘 is a multiple of 2. Can you form a similar theorem if n is a perfect cube or a perfect
fourth power? That is, if (i) n = b2 (ii) n = b4
What will be the general theorem?
Question
Prove the above theorem for perfect squares and cube for n = 46656.
𝑏 𝑏 𝑏 𝑏
Let 𝑏 = 𝑝1 1 𝑝2 2 𝑝3 3 … 𝑝𝑘 𝑘 be the CPF of 𝑏
𝑏 𝑏 𝑏 𝑏 𝑚
∴ 𝑛 = 𝑏 𝑚 = (𝑝1 1 𝑝2 2 𝑝3 3 … 𝑝𝑘 𝑘 )
𝑏 𝑚 𝑏 𝑚 𝑏 𝑚 𝑏 𝑚
∴ = (𝑝1 1 ) ( 𝑝2 2 ) (𝑝3 3 ) … ( 𝑝𝑘 𝑘 )
𝑚𝑏 𝑚𝑏 𝑚𝑏 𝑚𝑏
∴ = 𝑝1 1 𝑝2 2 𝑝3 3 … 𝑝𝑘 𝑘
Example :
Let n = 260 730 1120
(i) Is n a perfect square? Why?
(ii) Is n a perfect cube? Justify your answer.
(iii) Is n a perfect fifth power? How will you justify your answer?
In the above example, we note that out of the three primes in the CPF of n, 11 is such that its index is not a
multiple of 3. So we concluded that n is not a perfect third power or a perfect cube of any natural number.
So can we formulate a general criterion to decide when a given number is not a perfect mth power?
Theorem 3: 𝑛 is not perfect 𝑚th power if and only if there exists a prime 𝑝 in the CPF of 𝑛 whose index is
not a multiple of 𝑚.
Required Materials: About 20 square-shaped paper-cut outs having the same side length (Say 3 cm)
Now, the task is to form larger rectangles (Note that even a square is a rectangle) made by arranging the
smaller squares. Each time, take only a particular number of unit squares ‘n’ and try to form as many
rectangles as possible. Let one of the members of the group note down the number of such rectangles
possible out of n unit squares. Start with n = 1, and keep increasing n by 1 while recording the number of
rectangles possible.
Try to take values for all n up to 20. Initially, it seems easy but as you proceed, it becomes very tedious,
right? Well, is there a way to do this easily without having to use the unit squares? Let us find out. Have a
look at the possibilities for the height of the rectangles for n=4. They are 1, 2, and 4. What about n=6? 1, 2, 3
and 6. Notice that for each trial, the heights are all the factors of the number n. So you can simplify the
work of finding the number of rectangles by finding the number of factors of n.
Now, make a chart showing the number of rectangles i.e. the number of factors for every n up to 30 or so.
The chart is similar to the one shown in the figure below.
What do you notice in the chart here? Have a look at how many numbers have the answer as 1. Only n=1.
It is because 1 has only 1 factor i.e. itself. Next, notice the numbers which have only 2 possible rectangles.
They are 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, etc. What is your guess? Do you notice all of them are prime numbers? Next, notice
the values of n which can form 3 rectangles. They are 4, 9, 25, etc. If you notice carefully, these are the
squares of prime numbers. Now, look at the numbers which can form 4 possible rectangles. They are 6, 15,
35, etc. Find out the similarity between 6, 15 and 35. (Hint: Factorise them) Discuss in your group and find
out the reasons for these observations.
Definition: Let n, d be natural numbers. We say that d is a divisor of n if and only if there exists a natural
number q such that n = dq. In other words, we note that d is a divisor of n if and only if n is a multiple of
d.
Now take the number 32. We know that 32 = 25. Can you find out the factors of 32? Yes! They are 1, 2, 22,
23, 24, and 25 which is a total of 6 factors.
Next, take the number 36. We have 36 = 22 x 32. The factors of 36 are 1, 2, 22, 3, 32, 2x3, 22x3, 2x32 and 22x32
which is a total of 9 factors.
Now, let us look at an alternate approach to find the number of factors of a number rather than listing
them. Take the number 12. We notice 12 = 22 x 31.
Let us try to visualize this. Assume that you have two 2’s and one 3’s in a basket. This basket is in reality,
the number 12. There is another basket which you can call the ‘factor’. Now, your job is to fill this basket
by any number of 2’s and 3’s from your own basket. So, you can fill the basket with either zero, one or
two 2’s and either zero or one 3’s. There are three ways of filling 2’s and two ways of filling 3’s into the
‘factor’ basket. The total number of ways to do this is 6.
In other words, a factor of 12 is of the form 2a x 3b, where ‘a’ can be anything from {0, 1, 2} i.e. 3
possibilities and ‘b’ can be anything from {0, 1} i.e. 2 possibilities. So the number of factors of 12 is actually
How to find the number of factors of a given number ‘n’ without listing all of them?
Step 1: Find out the prime factorization of the number n.
Let this be n = (p1)a x (p2)b x (p3)c… and so on.
Step 2: Calculate the number X = (a+1) x (b+1) x (c+1) .... and so on. Now the calculated number ‘X’ is the
total number of factors of the number ‘n’
Question
Let a = 𝑝1 𝑎1 𝑝2 𝑎2 .... 𝑝𝑘 𝑎𝑘 , b = 𝑝1 𝑏1 𝑝2 𝑏2 .... 𝑝𝑘 𝑏𝑘 , c = 𝑝1 𝑐1 𝑝2 𝑐2 .... 𝑝𝑘 𝑐𝑘 be Canonical Prime Factorisation of a, b,
c respectively.
Let m1 = min {a1, b1, c1}, m2 = min {a2, b2, c2} , ... , mk = min {ak, bk, ck}
Let M1 = max {a1, b1, c1}, M2 = max {a2,b2,c2} , ... , MK = max {ak, bk, ck}
(Hint 2: Take a few examples with actual numbers. Try proving the same for 2 numbers first and then
move onto 3 numbers. Maybe try thinking what would happen if you have m1 = min{ a1, b1, c1 } + 1. Or m2
= max{ a1, b1, c1 } - 1. Try assuming things similar to these and bring a contradiction. Complete the proof
and show it to your teacher.)
Example: Find the HCF and LCM of 48 and 56 by the prime factorization method.
Solution: 48 = 24 x 31
56 = 23 x 71
HCF = 23 x 30 x 70 = 23 (The product of common prime factors with lesser index)
LCM = 2 x 3 x 71 (product of common prime factors with greater index).
4 1
Example: Find the HCF and LCM of 36, 48 and 60 by prime factorization method.
Solution: 36 = 22 x 32
48 = 24 x 31
60 = 22 x 31 x 51
HCF = 22 x 31 = 12
LCM = 24 x 32 x 51 = 720
Example: Two bells toll at intervals of 24 minutes and 36 minutes respectively. If they toll together at
9 am, after how many minutes do they toll together again, at the earliest?
Solution: The required time is LCM of 24 and 36.
24 = 23 x 3
36 = 22 x 32
LCM of 24 and 36 is 23 x 32 = 72
So, they will toll together after 72 minutes.
To determine if n is prime:
1. Find the biggest perfect square 𝑘 2≤ n.
2. Write out all the primes less than or equal to k.
3. Test if n is divisible by each of said primes on your list.
• If n is divisible by any of the primes, n is not prime.
• If n is divisible by none of the primes, n is prime.
This is a huge number so it might take a while for you to divide and find out whether the remainder is
zero or not. Although, some of you might know some shortcuts!
Divide the number formed by the last three digits. As 684 is not divisible by 8, so the given number is also
not divisible by 8.
For those of you who used the shortcut, you mean to say that 674856745489684 is also not divisible by 8?
Do you know why this trick works? How are you sure without proving it? Let us not be superstitious
even in mathematics by believing whatever we hear and try to know for sure whether something is true
or not.
Bonus 1: Do you notice that we have in reality proved a much stronger result?
n and xyz leave the same remainder when divided by 8.
If xyz leaves remainder 1 when divided by 8 then n also will leave exactly remainder 1 when divided by 8
etc. These are altogether 8 results. We call this the complete test of divisibility by 8.
Bonus 2: Does the above proof include the proof of, Test of divisibility of one more number?
Indeed, n and xyz leave the same remainder when divided by 125.
We have n and xyz leave the same remainder when divided by d where d is a divisor of 1000.
So, the secret of the last three digits is deciphered.
Question
State and prove the test of divisibility by 16.
(Hint: Look at the last four digits)
Now, for your convenience, we have provided here the divisibility tests for all numbers from 2 to 11.
Test for divisibility by 3: If the sum of the digits of the number is divisible by 3, then the number is
divisible by 3.
Proof : Consider the number abcde = a(10000) + b(1000) + c(100) + d(10) + e
= a(9999+1) + b(999+1) + c(99+1) + d(9+1) + e = (9999a + 999b + 99c +9d) + a + b + c + d + e.
So if a + b + c + d + e is divisible by 3 then abcde will be divisible by 3.
Example: 321492 is divisible by 3 as the sum of the digits = 3+2+1+4+9+2 = 21 is divisible by 3.
Test for divisibility by 4: If the number formed by the last two digits is divisible by 4, then the original
number is also divisible by 4.
Hint: Same as proof for divisibility by 8.
Example: 82432 is divisible by 4 as the last two digits, 32 is divisible by 4.
Test for divisibility by 5: If the last digit is 0 or 5 then the number is divisible by 5.
Prove it yourself.
Test for divisibility by 7: Double the last digit and subtract it from the remaining number. If the result is
divisible by 7, then so was the original number. Apply this rule repeatedly as required.
Example: 2401 is divisible by 7 by steps as follows:
240 – 2 x 1 = 240 – 2 = 238.
23 – 8 x 2 = 23 – 16 = 7 which is divisible by 7.
Proof :
Let N be the number that we want to divide by 7. Let b be the unit’s digit and a be the rest of the digit.
Then N = 10a + b.
If a - 2b is divisible by 7, then we can find a natural number k such that a - 2b = 7k (Can you see why?).
Multiply both sides by 10, we have 10a - 20b = 70k. Adding b on both sides, we have 10a - 20b + b= 70k +
b. Now, 10a + b = 70k + 21b. Notice that the left-hand side of our equation is N and the right-hand side can
be divided by 7. Therefore, 10a + b = N is divisible by 7. That proves our first statement that If a - 2b is
divisible by 7, N is divisible by 7.
Test for divisibility by 8: The number formed by the last three digits should be divisible by 8.
Test for divisibility by 9: The sum of all the digits of the number should be divisible by 9. Example: 963 is
divisible by 9 as 9+6+3=18 is divisible by 9.
Prove it yourself. (Hint: Same as divisibility by 3)
Test for divisibility by 10: The last digit must be 0.
Test for divisibility by 11: A number N is divisible by 11 if the alternating sum of the digits is divisible by
11.
Proof: Suppose we have a 3-digit number that is expressed in the form: 100a+10b+c we then can transpose
this into: 99a + a + 11b – b + c and that equals: (99a+11b)+(a-b+c) which equals 11(9a+b)+(a-b+c)
Since the first addend, 11(9a+b) will always be divisible by 11, we just need to make sure that (a-b+c) is
divisible by 11.
You can use this for any number. Here it is again, with an even-numbered digit number:
1000a + 100b + 10c + d
1001a – a + 99b + b + 11c – c + d
(1001a + 99b + 11c) - (a – b + c – d)
11(91a + 9b + c) - (a – b + c – d)
So, you just need to check (a – b + c – d) for divisibility with 11.
Example: 1331 is divisible by 11 as 133 – 1 = 132 which is again divisible by 11 as 13 – 2 = 11.
Note: Do not confuse the test for divisibility by 7 and 11. Test for 7 involves subtracting twice the last digit
and Test for 11 involves subtracting the last digit once.
Question
Find the smallest number to be divisible by all numbers from 1 to 10.
(Hint: You can use the knowledge you have gained in the fundamental theorem of arithmetic or Euclid’s
division algorithm)
Rational Numbers:
p
Numbers that can be written in the form of (q 0), where p, q are integers, are called Rational numbers.
q
Terminating decimal numbers: These are decimal values that have only a finite number of non-zero digits
after the decimal point. Ex: 0.25
Non-terminating Recurring decimal numbers: These are decimal values that have an infinite number of
non-zero digits after the decimal point and also a repeating block of digits.
Ex: 0.25252525.....
Note: Every terminating decimal and non-terminating repeating decimal can be expressed in the form
p
(q 0) .
q
Group Activity: To explore the different types of rational numbers, i.e. terminating
and non-terminating repeating.
Draw a table on a sheet of paper with eleven rows and eleven columns. In the first row and column, fill in
the numbers from 1 to 10 starting from the second cell as shown below
Now for all remaining cells, take p as the row number and q as the column number and calculate the
decimal value of p/q. For example, a cell in row 2 and column 3 corresponds to 2/3 = 0.666666...
This is a non-terminating recurring decimal. For all terminal decimals, fill the cell with ‘T’ and all non-
terminating recurring decimals with ‘N’.
Do you notice a pattern in the table of Ts and Ns? Is it dependent on their column number/row number?
Discuss.
1 2 3 4 5 ...
1
2
3
4
5
...
Theorem:
p
(a) Let ‘x’ be a terminating decimal. Then ‘x’ can be expressed as (q 0), where p and q are co-primes,
q
and the prime factorization of q is of the form 2m x 5n
27 27
Example (i) 0.27 = = 2
100 2 5 2
2 2 589 589
(ii) 2.356 = 3 =
2 53 2 53
𝑝 𝑝
(b) If 𝑞 is a rational number and 𝑞 is not of the form 2m x 5n (m and n W), then 𝑞 has a non-terminating
repeating decimal expansion.
Example Which of the following rational numbers are terminating decimals?
17 25 68 125
1. 3 2 2. 2 3. 2 4. 3
2 5 3 2 3
2 5 7
2 2
3 72
17
Solution Clearly 3 2 is the only terminating decimal and the remaining are non-terminating
2 5
decimals.
Hippassus of Metapontum, a Greek philosopher of the Pythagorean school of thought, is widely regarded
as the first person to recognize the existence of irrational numbers. Supposedly, he tried to use his
teacher's famous theorem a2 + b2 = c2 to find the length of the diagonal of a unit square. But the length of
the diagonal which he found could not be expressed as a ratio of 2 integers! The other Pythagoreans
believed that every number in this world can be expressed as a ratio of 2 co-prime integers. What
happened next has been the subject of speculation for centuries. In short, Hippassus may have died
because of his discovery.
So, what did happen to Hippassus? No one will probably ever know for sure, but below are some better-
known stories.
• Some believe that the Pythagoreans were so horrified by the idea of irrational numbers that they
threw Hippassus overboard on a sea voyage and vowed to keep the existence of irrational
numbers a secret.
• After Hippassus discovered irrational numbers, the Pythagoreans banished him, and the gods
were so disgusted by his discovery that they destroyed his boat on the high seas.
• Hippassus discovered irrational numbers, and then died on an ocean voyage as the result of a
natural accident. Nonetheless, his colleagues were still so displeased with his discovery that they
wished they had been the ones to throw him overboard.
Another possibility is that none of the stories above are true, and they are tales invented to exaggerate and
highlight an important event in the history of mathematics!
However, if Hippassus did discover irrational numbers, it is not clear which method he used to do
so. Regardless of what happened, it is difficult to imagine a time when proving the existence of an
irrational number was a moral transgression.
One reason to think that positive rational numbers would form the basis for all things in the universe is
that there is an infinite amount of them. Intuitively, it might seem reasonable that an infinite amount of
numbers should be enough to describe anything that might exist. The number line is infinitely dense with
rational numbers. The existence of irrational numbers implies that despite this infinite density, there are
still holes in the number line that cannot be described as a ratio of two integers.
Pythagoras Theorem states that the two sides a, b and the hypotenuse c of a right-angled triangle is
related by a2 + b2 = c2
Now take a sheet of paper and construct a right-angled triangle with equal sides of 1 unit length (say 1
inch or 3 cm depending on your choice) in the middle of the paper. Use set squares and compasses
wherever required. The length of the hypotenuse, by Pythagoras theorem, is √2
Then, extend a line with length 1 unit at right angles to the first hypotenuse as follows. This gives us
length √3 after we apply Pythagoras' Theorem to the new triangle.
Keep going this way to construct more numbers until you almost finish one revolution of a spiral. What is
the last number that you have constructed? If it was √17 then your construction was nearly perfect!
Now, measure all the distances and verify the values using your calculator. For example, √2 = 1.4 units
(Approximately). Verify this distance using your measuring scale.
This spiral is known as the ‘Wheel of Theodorus’, named after the discoverer Theodorus of Cyrene who
was a 5th century B.C. mathematician. He was born around 100 years after Pythagoras.
This wheel is also known as the ‘Pythagorean Snail’ owing to its shape.
Question
Think of other methods to construct numbers like √5, √10, √13 etc.
(Hint: Use numbers other than 1 and write the numbers in the form of a sum of 2, 3 or more squares)
Now repeat steps 1 to 4 with the next BC as the current BE. You will obtain the square root of square root
of x i.e. the 4th root of x. Continue this way to construct further powers of x.
Note:
• Add divisor to negative remainder then it will gives positive remainder
• Subtract positive remainder from divisor then it will gives negative remainder
Example : Find the remainder of the expression of 107 / 9
Positive remainder = +8
Negative remainder = -1
In this expression finding the negative remainder is very easy when compare to positive
remainder.
So take negative remainder “-1″ and add to it divisor ” 9″ then gives final answer = – 1 +
9 =8
The remainder of the expression will be the same as the remainder of the
expression
Where
A R is the remainder when “A” is divided by ” N”
B R is the remainder when “B” is divided by ” N”
C R is the remainder when “C” is divided by ” N”
D R is the remainder when “D” is divided by ” N”
If we can express the expression in the form , the remainder will become 1
Example : Find the remainder when (321) 5 6 8 7 is divided by 8
321 can be expressed as [(8×40) + 1] so
remainder of the above example is (1) 5 6 8 7 = 1
If we can express the expression in the form , the remainder will become ( – 1 ) n
Example : Find the remainder when (146) 5 6 is divided by 7
146 can be expressed as [(7×21) – 1] so
Remainder of the above example is ( - 1) 5 6 = 1
Exercises:
1. What is the least value of x, so that 2x5472 is A. 61 B. 56
divisible by 9 C. 52 D. 65
A. 7 B. 8
C. 9 D. 3 11.A number N2 has 15 factors. How many factors
can N have?
2. What is the least value of k. So that 123k578 is
A. 5 or 7 factors B. 6 or 8 factors
divisible by 11.
C. 4 or 6 factors D. 9 or 8 factors
A. 8 B. 7
C. 5 D. 6
12. A set has exactly five consecutive positive
3. Find the number of different prime factors of
integers starting with 1. What is the percentage
2400
decrease in the average of the numbers when the
A.4 B. 2
greatest one of the numbers is removed from the
C. 3 D.5
set?
4. A boy was asked to find 7/9 of a number. But he A. 8.54 B. 12.56
divided the number by 7/9, Thus he got 32 more C. 15.25 D. 16.6
than the correct answer. Find the number.
A.61 B. 63 13. What is the correct arrangement of the
C. 62 D.54 5 7 13 16 3
fractions , , , , and in ascending order of
8 12 16 29 4
5. Find the greatest number that will divide 1657, magnitude.
and 2037 to leaves the remainder 6 and 5
respectively 16 7 5 3 13
A. < < < <
A.121 B. 123 29 12 8 4 16
C. 129 D.127 16 7 5 13 3
B. 29 < 12 < 8 < 16 < 4
6. Four bells first begin to toll together with
7 16 5 13 3
intervals of 5, 10, 15 and 20 sec. How many times C. 12 < 29
< 8 < 16 < 4
does they toll together in an hour? 16 5 7 3 13
D. < < < <
29 8 12 4 16
A.60 B. 59
C. 61 D.58
1
14. If x = (8 + 3 7 ) , what is the value x − ?
8.If 1624 is divided by 17, the remainder is x
A.1 B. 3 A. 13 B. 14
C. 4 D.8 C. 15 D. 16
11. L.C.M of two numbers is 192 and their H.C.F is 21. (74 + 75 + 76 + 77 + .... + 149 + 150) =?
16. If one of them is 48. Find the other A.8624 B. 8634
A.32 B. 64 C. 8654 D.8644
C. 48 D.68
22. (112 + 122 + 132 + ........+ 252) =?
12. Two numbers are in the ratio 5:8 and their A. 7140 B. 6140
H.C.F is 4. Find the numbers. C. 5140 D.8654
A.25 and 40 B. 20 and 32
C. 30 and 48 D.15 and 24 23. If n is a natural number, then (n3 - n) is always
divisible by
13. Find the greatest number which divides 284, A.8 B. 6
678 and 1618 leaves the same remainder in each C.12 D. Can't be determined
case.
A.2 B. 3
30. The sum of the first 100 numbers, 1 to 100 is 41. Find the smallest number that has exactly 18
always divisible by factors.
A.2 B. 2 and 4 A. 180 B. 216
C. 2, 4 and 8 D.None of these C.240 D. None of these
31. Find the least value of 'a' so that 365a24 is 42. If a three-digit number ‘abc’ has 2 factors
divisible by 8. (where a, b, c are digits), how many factors does
A.9 B. 8 the 6- digit number ‘abcabc’ have?
C. 0 D.2 A.16 B. 24
C. 18 D. 30
32. Find the number of digits that are to be used in
numbering a book of 400 pages. 43. What is the smallest number that has exactly 12
A.1094 B. 1093 factors?
C. 1092 D.1099 A.211 B. 60
C. 120 D.144