Eac Shubham
Eac Shubham
Eac Shubham
TITLE OF PROJECT
1
Certificate
This is to certify that following student of fifth semester of diploma in civil engineering of
Institute Shree Samarth Polytechnic, Mhasane Phata. has completed the micro project
satisfactorily in subject Estimating & Costing for academic year 2023-24 asprescribed in the
curriculum.
SUBMITTED BY:-
2
5.0 Action plan
3
6.0 Resources required
1 Windows 1
Computer 10, 4GB RAM &
500GB storage
2 Internet wikipedia 1
3 MS office word 1
4
Aim of micro-project :-To provide quality of Highway project costs
estimating methods used in the planning stage of project.
Literature review
1. We have collected The Highway project costs estimating methods used in the
planning stage of project development
2. We take information of H i g h w a y p r o j e c t c o s t s e s t i m a t i n g
methodsusedintheplanningstageofproject
d e v e l o p m e n t in Nirali publication.
5
INTRODUCTION
-Expert judgment, guided by historical information, provides valuable insight aboutthe environment
and information from prior similar projects.
When estimating costs, this technique relies on the actual cost of previous, similar
6
projects as the basis for estimating the cost of the current project.
It is most reliable when the previous projects are similar in fact and not just in appearance, and
the project team members preparing the estimates have theneeded expertise.
Bottom-up estimating is a method of estimating a component of work. The costof individual work
packages or activities is estimated to the greatest level of specified detail. The detailed cost is
then summarized or rolled up to higher levels for subsequent reporting and tracking purposes.
The cost and accuracy of bottom-up cost estimating are typically influenced bythe size and
complexity of the individual activity or work package.
• Most likely (M): The cost of the activity, based on realistic effort assessment for
the required work and any predicted expenses.
• Optimistic (O): The activity cost based on analysis of the best-case scenario for
the activity.
• Pessimistic (P): The activity cost based on analysis of the worst-case scenario for
the activity.
7
Depending on the assumed distribution of values within the range of the three estimates the expected
cost, cE, can be calculated using a formula. Two commonly used formulas are triangular and beta
distributions. The formulas are:
Triangular DistributionE =
(O+M+P)/3
Beta Distribution (from a traditional PERT analysis)E =
(O+4M+P)/6
Cost estimates based on three points with an assumed distribution provide anexpected cost and
clarify the range of uncertainty around the expected cost.
The accuracy of single-point activity cost estimates may be improved by considering estimation
uncertainty and risk and using three estimates to definean approximate range for an activity‘s
cost:
• Most likely (M): The cost of the activity, based on realistic effort assessment for
the required work and any predicted expenses.
• Optimistic (O): The activity cost based on analysis of the best-case scenario for
the activity.
• Pessimistic (P): The activity cost based on analysis of the worst-case scenario for
the activity.
Depending on the assumed distribution of values within the range of the three estimates the expected
cost, cE, can be calculated using a formula. Two commonly used formulas are triangular and beta
distributions. The formulas are:
Triangular DistributionE =
(O+M+P)/3
Beta Distribution (from a traditional PERT analysis)E =
(O+4M+P)/6
Cost estimates based on three points with an assumed distribution provide anexpected cost and
clarify the range of uncertainty around the expected cost.
The accuracy of single-point activity cost estimates may be improved by considering estimation
uncertainty and risk and using three estimates to definean approximate range for an activity‘s
cost:
• Most likely (M): The cost of the activity, based on realistic effort assessment for
the required work and any predicted expenses.
• Optimistic (O): The activity cost based on analysis of the best-case scenario for
8
the activity.
• Pessimistic (P): The activity cost based on analysis of the worst-case scenario for
the activity.
Depending on the assumed distribution of values within the range of the three estimates the expected
cost, cE, can be calculated using a formula. Two commonly used formulas are triangular and beta
distributions. The formulas are:
Triangular DistributionE =
(O+M+P)/3
Beta Distribution (from a traditional PERT analysis)E =
(O+4M+P)/6
Cost estimates based on three points with an assumed distribution provide anexpected cost and
clarify the range of uncertainty around the expected cost.
Instead of overestimating each cost, money is budgeted for dealing with unplanned but statistically
predictable cost increases. Funds allocated for thispurpose are called contingency reserves.
8) Decision-Making Method
Some decision techniques are unanimity, majority, plurality, points allocation, and dictatorship.
For unanimity, everyone must agree; there is a shared consensus. A majority or plurality is usually
determined by a vote. For a majority,the decision must be agreed to by more than half the
participants.
9
Purpose of Construction Cost EstimationOwner’s
Purpose of Cost Estimation
-Making investment decision in the conceptual stage.
-Negotiate and finalize the contract at the implementation phase.
-To implement cost control measures.
-Ranking alternatives
-Evaluate economics and financial feasibility
-As a check on more detailed estimates
10
Unit prices are obtained from data on projects already performed. Cost of labor, material, and
equipment for all units of work are added together anddivided by the number of units involved.
3. Assembly or Conceptual Cost Estimation
-We base our estimate on the cost of existing -projects that were built in thepast
-Price-level changes over time
-We need to project costs of future projects
-Many organizations publish construction cost data on regular basis.
2. Cost Indices
Used to update old cost informationUses of
Cost Indices
11
-There is a reporting time log.
Cost of new facility = cost of old facility x (new cost index/old cost index)To predict
future cost
F = P (1 + i)n
F = future cost
P = present cost
i = predicted rate of cost escalation per period
1) Transport cost
Taxes
2) Labor supply and
3) local productivity
4) Codes and
local inspection
-Construction costs also vary in different regions of the USA.
-ENR and Means publishes
periodicallythe indices of
local construction costs in
the major cities.
4. Project Size
-As the quantity built increases, the unit cost decreases,Size Factor =
12
-Quality
-Soil condition
-Weather Condition
-Competition
-Productivity
Table 4.1 represents highway construction cost indices and inflation trendsbased on data
received from
MDT. STE calculated yearly inflation trends by evaluating the percent change incost index from
one year
to the next.
Table 4.1 MDT Reported Highway Construction Cost Indices and STECalculated
Inflation Rates
The ROCKS database was used for this research. This database contains road works cost data
from 65 developing countries. Among these countries Polandand Thailand have a relatively
large number of projects. For this reason they were chosen in this study to investigate the
relationship between project costand other variables such as work activity, terrain type, road
parameters etc.
The quality of the available database influences estimation accuracy regardless of the method
used. Two methods were used to increase the quality of the ROCKS database. One was filling
in missing data by using the expectation-maximization method and the other by generating
synthetic databy using Road Construction Cost (RCC) models (Tsunokawa, 1983).
Rcc Models.
New construction and reconstruction projects have the greatest share of construction
quantities such as site preparation, earthwork and drainage. Prediction of these construction
quantities can be done using the Road Construction Cost (RCC) model. RCC models were
developed to predict physical quantities of an average site clearing/grubbing and earthwork
volume. On the basis of a recommendation made by Tsunokawa K. (1987)following
empirical relationship is used to predict the approximate area ofsite clearing and grubbing:
13
New construction
14
networks can cope with noisy data, missing data, imprecise or corrupted data, and still
produce a good solution (Nikola K., 1998). Among supervised learning artificial neural
networks multilayer perceptron (MLP) with backpropagation algorithm (further used as
ANN) achieved popularity in numerous research areas and this type ANN was tested in this
paper. One ofthe reasons for this was that it is a pioneer artificial neural network which
showed promise to solve ill-defined, complicated, complex problems which are hard to
describe in mathematical formula or expression.
REFERENCES:
15
1. SEARCH IN INTERNET
2. TEACHERS HELP
1. NIRALI PUBLICATION
a) understanding
d) team work
16