(Creditcoin) White Paper
(Creditcoin) White Paper
(Creditcoin) White Paper
Whitepaper
Published March 2022
1st publication - November 2019
Abstract
By bootstrapping transparency into its ecosystem, Creditcoin can help facilitate the
trust and market information required for efficient lending markets, freeing DeFi from its
over-collateralization requirement, enabling new types of economic relationships, and
bridging the gap between cryptocurrencies and the real-world lending economy.
Decentralized platforms which leverage both lower costs of verification, and reduce
the cost of networking, can enable new kinds of decentralized markets designed to
empower end-users, rather than platform owners. Helping us build a future of financial
inclusion and credit for all.
2
Table of Contents
Background 5
Problem Statement 7
User Flow 23
Fundraiser’s Flow 24
Investor/Lender’s Flow 24
Collector’s Flow 25
Creditcoin Tokenomics 26
CTC vs G-CRE 27
Creditcoin’s Unique Token Model 27
Creditcoin Distribution 28
The Creditcoin Token Sale 30
Mining and Mining Pools 31
Governance 32
Regulatory, Compliance, and Legal Considerations 33
Team 34
Gluwa 34
Aella 36
[ Appendix ]
User Flow 39
Fundraiser’s Flow 39
3
Table of Contents
Software Architecture 45
Introduction 45
Purpose 45
Scope 45
Overview 45
Architectural Goals and Constraints 45
Use Cases 46
User Use Cases 46
Investor and Fundraiser Use Cases 47
Subsystems and Layering 48
Processes 49
Deployment 50
Implementation Notes 50
Configuration Notes 51
Creditcoin Workflow 52
Exchange G-CRE to CTC 52
Register Ethereum Address 52
Show Address ID of the Registered Address 52
Exchange G-CRE to CTC 53
Using the Registered Ethereum Address 53
Using the Exchange() Transaction On G-CRE Smart Contract 53
Review the Updated CTC Balance 53
Create Investment Orders 53
Create Investment Offers 54
Create Deals 55
Exempt Loans 56
Transfer Loans 56
Repay Loans 56
Demonstration 57
4
Background
Since Satoshi Nakamoto’s release of the Bitcoin whitepaper, the usage of blockchain
technology and by extension, cryptocurrencies, has rapidly expanded. Distributed
ledger technologies including blockchains share several key properties:
• They represent a distributed database with no central point of control (or failure).
• They rely on peer-to-peer communication between nodes to achieve consensus.
• They (generally) afford transparency whilst maintaining pseudonymity.
• They provide transaction immutability/irreversibility.
• They operate via programmed logic.
In conjunction, these properties ensure that blockchain networks are able to record
tamper-proof and immutable data in an open and participatory environment. This
confers a number of economic advantages.
Finally, cryptocurrencies have leveraged these two effects to great benefit. Verifying
payment is now easy and secure (cost of networking), meanwhile anybody with access
to the internet can create a wallet and exchange cryptocurrencies (cost of networking).
Combined with the as-of-yet untapped potential of programmable money to enable
new kinds of financial instruments, cryptocurrency will inevitably form the backbone of
tomorrow’s financial system. A system in which people are empowered to be their own
bank.
1 Catalini, Christian, and Joshua S. Gans. 2016. “Some Simple Economics of the Blockchain.” NBER Working Paper No.
22952. Accessed (21/05/2021): http://www.nber.org/papers/w22952.
2 Ibid.
5
Background
However, cryptocurrency still lacks a developed market for credit-based lending and
borrowing. As DeFi’s collateralised lending model cannot bridge the gap between crypto
and real-world lending, a new type of platform for cryptocurrency credit investments
must be established. A platform which leverages the inherent advantages of distributed
ledger technologies, openness and trustless verification, to reduce existing information
asymmetries and enable a more efficient global credit market.
The developing world represents the ideal grounds for such a network and further
blockchain/cryptocurrency adoption. Currently, low trust in authorities, poor market
information and underdeveloped financial infrastructures all inhibit economic growth and
security.
Creditcoin aims to build a blockchain which helps overcome these barriers, facilitating
a borderless, open and efficient market for credit designed to serve the millions of
unbanked and underbanked people in the developing world. We believe this is the
natural evolution of Nakamoto’s original vision for cryptocurrencies - the creation of a
sound currency for everyone regardless of borders or nationality.
6
Problem Statement
Globally, over 1.7 billion people still live without access to the formal financial system.
These underbanked and unbanked people face systematic challenges when trying to
access formal lines of credit. Even though access to credit represents a vital component
of economic growth in developing countries, credit markets remain chronically
underdeveloped and inefficient. For example, in Nigeria, the private credit to GDP ratio
was 11%, compared to 191% in the United States.3)
Limited access to credit inhibits the growth of developing countries. In Africa, limited
access to credit is cited as the single biggest constraint on growth for micro, small and
medium enterprises (MSMEs)4). And globally, the credit financing shortfall is estimated to
be worth $5 trillion, spread across over 130 million different enterprises.5) Put simply, this
is a problem arising due to limited market information, poor infrastructure and restricted
networks.
Without access to ‘thick’ and open financial records, primarily credit history, many
lending institutions cannot reliably assess risk or offer loan products. In other words,
banks often suffer from adverse selection in less developed financial systems.6)
This exacerbates the usage of informal credit lines where credit information is left
unrecorded or siloed. Indeed, the OECD has noted that SMEs lack of “credible financial
records’’ is their primary obstacle to accessing credit.7)
This creates a vicious cycle, in which people are forced into informal and expensive
channels of lending, which further entrenches their lack of reliable financial history.
Beyond this, accessibility to the formal banking system and wider services remains
limited due to accessibility limitations such as ID requirements. As a result, millions of
people do not accumulate credit history.
A similar problem also exists for local lending intermediaries. Whilst local lending parties
3 World Bank, “Domestic Credit to private sector (% of GDP)”, Accessed (02/06/2021): https://data.worldbank.org/
indicator/FS.AST.PRVT.GD.ZS?locations=NG-US
4 Babajide Fowowe, “Access to finance and firm performance: Evidence from African countries”, Review of Development
Finance, Vol. 7 No. 1, 2017, pp.6-17
5 SME Finance Forum, “MSME Finance Gap”, Accessed (22/05/2021): https://www.smefinanceforum.org/data-sites/
msme-finance-gap
6 Svetlana Andrianova, Badi Baltagi, Panicos Demtriades, & David Fielding, “Why do African Banks Lend so Little”,
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 77, No. 3, pp.339-359, 2015
7 OECD, “New Approaches to SME and Entrepreneurship Financing: Broadening the Range of Instruments”, 2015
8 OECD, “Facilitating Access to Finance, Discussion Paper on Credit Information Sharing”, 2010.
7
Problem Statement
may be able to effectively assess risk and deploy loans, either through local knowledge
or data analysis techniques such as machine learning, any records they generate are
siloed or untrustworthy. Without the means to reliably audit the lending performance of
an intermediary, third-party investors cannot reliably invest lending capital. As a result,
institutions, or even individuals, struggle to raise lending capital effectively.
In summary, there is a vicious cycle of poor market information leading to poor market
outcomes. The lack of trustworthy and open credit history makes the process of
verification (risk assessment) very difficult. Solving these informational asymmetries
is crucial if we are to expand the availability of much-needed financing instruments,
increase capital-allocation efficiency in developing markets, and drive financial inclusion
forwards.
8
The Solution - Creditcoin
Technical explanation
Real-world lending necessarily relies on trust. Trust is based on the ability of lenders,
or other investing parties, to gather reliable market information from which to assess
the risks of a prospective lending investment. The most valuable form of information for
assessing risk is attributable credit history. By building a blockchain to record on-chain
credit transaction events, Creditcoin offers a way to record immutable, secure and open
credit transaction data for purposes of verification and risk assessment.
In its most basic form, credit history is tied to wallet addresses. This means that
individuals without access to a bank, or other financial institution, can accumulate
credit history as long as they hold a crypto wallet. The only requirement is the use of
a Creditcoin compatible chain (currently BTC/ERC20), allowing Creditcoin to serve the
9
The Solution - Creditcoin
unbanked.
By recording transparent credit history data for the purposes of verification, Creditcoin
bootstraps transparency into its ecosystem, reducing informational asymmetries
between transacting parties. Credit information sharing has been proven to reduce
default rates.11) Therefore, by improving market information Creditcoin decreases the
risks of investment for lending and investing parties, and by extension lowers interest
rates for credit-worthy end-users.
Network effects describe the increasing economic utility a network offers as its user
base grows. Facebook is considered a valuable network due to the number of parties it
lets you connect with. However, networks on centralized platforms also create market
power for the network holders.12) In the age of digital platforms, the most valuable
9 Fran Casino, Thomas K. Dasaklis, Constantino Patsakis, “A systematic literature review of blockchain-based
applications: Current status, classification and open issues”, Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 36, pp. 55-81, 2019
10 Maik Dierkes, Carsten Erner, Thomas Langer, Lars Norden, “Business credit information sharing and default risk of
private firms”, Journal of Banking & Finance, Volume 37, Issue 8, 2013, pp.2867-2878
11 Samuel Fosu, Albert Danso, Henry Agyei-Boapeah, Collins G. Ntim, & Emmanuel Adegbite, “Credit Information sharing
and loan default in developing countries: the moderating effect of baking market concentration and national governance
quality”, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, pp.55-103, 2020
12 Cathy Barrera, “The Blockchain Effect: Network Effects without Market Power Costs”, Accessed (24/05/2021): https://
medium.com/mit-cryptoeconomics-lab/the-blockchain-effect-86bd01006ec2
10
The Solution - Creditcoin
asset these networks accrue is data. In such a model, platforms can monopolistically
leverage or sell this data for their own advantage, extracting rents and creating market
inefficiencies.
The same market dynamics affect the global credit industry. A limited number of parties
possess the information required to assess risk - be it a person, business, private broker
or any other kind of lending intermediary. The majority of this valuable credit data is
siloed and monetized by existing credit platforms, as opposed to the end-user. The
problem is one of data-ownership.
This open economy model allows any party to use Creditcoin in order to compete
for funding, create a business, invest their money, form a lending pool or build an
application on top of Creditcoin. All without any form of centralized control.
Reputational incentives are considered more important for facilitating effective credit
markets than legal enforcement contracts14). Creditcoin is designed to function as an
open reputational ledger. As the network expands, the reputational damage caused by
repayment failure will increase. This will create a self-reinforcing network incentive for
repayment as the network grows, reducing loan default rates, and facilitating overall
lending volume increases15).
Transparent networks can also have more widely positive macroeconomic effects. Credit
information sharing reduces the likelihoods of banking crises, especially in developing
13 Tullio Jappelli, and Marco Pagano, “Information Sharing, Lending and Defaults: Cross country Evidence”, Centre for
Studies in Economics and Finance, Working Paper No. 22, 1999
14 Ernst Fehr, and Christian Zehnder, “Reputation and Credit Market Formation: How Relational Incentives and Legal
Contract Enforcement Interact”, IZA Institute of Labour Economics, Discussion Paper No. 4351, 2009
15 Tullio Jappelli, and Marco Pagano, “Information Sharing, Lending and Defaults: Cross country Evidence”, Centre for
Studies in Economics and Finance, Working Paper No. 22, 1999
11
The Solution - Creditcoin
countries, due to its moderating effect on adverse selection and bad/risky loans16). A
transparent and open standard for international credit history can help build a more
stable and secure global financial system.
Open networks are the most valuable networks and first movers often build the biggest
networks. The internet was the first open information network, Bitcoin was the first
open value network, Ethereum was the first open programmable-value network17), and
Creditcoin is attempting to become the first open credit network.
16 Berrak Büyükkarabacak & Nevan Valev, “Credit Information sharing and banking crises: An empirical investigation”,
Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp.788-800, 2012.
17 Aaron hay, “Crypto and Network Effects”, Accessed (25/05/2021): https://medium.com/coinmonks/crypto-and-
network-effects-e66e69e754d3
12
The Creditcoin Ecosystem
The Creditcoin Network consists of 1) Investors that fund the loan processes by adding
Ask Orders onto the blockchain, and depositing funds when loans are made, 2) Lending
Pools that comprise an aggregation of all Ask Orders in addition to Gluwa Capital, 3)
Fundraisers or Lenders that add Bid Orders for Loans in to the market, and End-User/
Borrowers that create the demand for funds and therefore make the market. Posting
transactions or retrieving transaction data to/from the Creditcoin Blockchain will utilize
Credal - the Creditcoin API. These stakeholders can be further explained as follows:
Lending Pools (or Money Markets) - A Lending Pool is formed through the aggregation
of investors’ Ask Orders on the Credticoin Network. They also can be created with the
13
The Creditcoin Ecosystem
technical assistance of Gluwa Capital which facilitates the onboarding process for the
Creditcoin blockchain, in addition to providing wallet, exchange, and investment services
through the Gluwa-wrapped stable coin, Gluwacoin. Gluwa Capital is a venture-debt
fund that invests in startups aimed at progressing the defi lending landscape. Gluwa
Fund LP is the limited partnership that exists between Gluwa Capital (General Partner)
and Investors (Limited Partners). If you are a fintech lender/startup seeking funds to lend
among your community, Gluwa Capital can help through direct investment or by loan
tranches. Not only does this build the network of funds available to fundraisers around
the world, but it also provides greater access to capital for borrowers who typically
do not have access to traditional lending. Gluwa Capital also utilizes the lending pools
created through its Gluwa Invest products - namely the Gluwa Savings Accounts, Bond
Accounts and Prize-Linked Savings Accounts.
If you are a Fintech Lender Startup, or a lending intermediary looking to secure funding
for your borrowers, please visit the Gluwa Capital homepage to inquire about eligibility
14
The Creditcoin Ecosystem
for potential investment. The sooner you are on boarded to the Creditcoin blockchain,
the sooner you can access the vast ecosystem of of Creditcoin investors, as well as
be able to utilize Gluwa wallet functionalities, and Credal - the Creditcoin API, making
it easy for you to establish connections to the Creditcoin blockchain, record your
transactions, and begin gaining the efficiencies of transacting on a blockchain platform
for your users.
Much like what Infura does for the Ethereum Network, Credal does for the Creditcoin
Network. Credal is an API middleware layer that radically simplifies the development of
your lending app or platform by connecting to the Creditcoin Blockchain with its white-
labeled solution.
If you are a Fintech Lending startup, a defi startup, a small to large lending institution, a
microfinance/microloan service provider, an NGO or government entity associated with
lending in the developing world, or simply a “builder” - a blockchain developer - who
wants to build an dApp that transacts on the Creditcoin blockchain, Credal allows the
following:
• Access to a vast pool of loaned crypto or fiat funds - a money market of funds with
a variety of term limits and return levels.
• Record on an immutable and secure ledger with provisioned access to loan/
lending/financial transactions.
• Utilize a standardized methodology for credit scoring, or complement your own
technology.
• Access to a role-based, analytics dashboards highlighting your investments,
your loans, your access to lending offers, deals or pools of funds, and view your
success rates or performance.
• Ability to deposit funds or drawdown funds with instantaneous settlement and
processing.
Credal allows you to build this flexibility into your business, with all the advantages of
DLT that the Creditcoin Network offers.
For investors/lenders who do not require access to funds via Gluwa Capital, and who just
want to build and take advantage of the public Creditcoin Blockchain, Credal offers a API
call cost model. Please contact support@creditcoin.org for more information.
15
The Creditcoin Ecosystem
Creditcoin Implementation
16
The Creditcoin Ecosystem
Investors
Phase 2 Phase 3
17
The Creditcoin Ecosystem
Phase 2 Phase 3
18
The Creditcoin Ecosystem
Phase 2 Phase 3
19
The Creditcoin Ecosystem
End-Users
Phase 2 Phase 3
20
The Creditcoin Ecosystem
• With 1.7 billion unbanked (some sources say it is as high as 2 billion), Creditcoin
hopes to allay the cycle of poverty exhibited by developing country populations cut
off from traditional banking infrastructure.
• There are 1033 large scale Micro-Finance Institutions (MFIs) globally that offered
their services to 116.6 million borrowers in 2015. These financial service providers
(FSP) have a gross loan portfolio of US$92.4 billion and US$58.9 billion of
deposits18).
• In 2018, 139.9 million borrowers benefited from the services of MFIs, compared to
just 98 million in 2009. Of these 139.9 million borrowers, 80% are women and 65%
are rural borrowers, proportions that have remained stable over the past ten years,
despite the increase in the number of borrowers. With an estimated credit portfolio
of $124.1 billion, MFIs recorded another year of growth in 2018 (+8.5% compared
to 2017)19).
• Microfinancing is only available to 20% of the 3 billion global population classified
as “poor” while the global market for Microfinance is projected to reach US$313.7
billion by 202520).
• Globally, the notional value of bonds outstanding totalled $106 trillion at the end of
2019, with a range of $17 trillion–$21 trillion in annual issuance over the preceding
decade21).
• Collateralised lending and forced liquidation removes counterparty risk for lenders.
• DeFi lending protocols do not interface with the off-chain world, but rather rely
exclusively on verifying on-chain information. Therefore they do not encounter
the ‘last-mile’ problem. Whilst blockchain offers immutable and costless on-chain
18 MIX, “2015 Global Outreach & Financial Performance Benchmark Report”, Accessed (04/06/2021):https://www.
themix.org/publications/2015-global-outreach-and-financial-performance-benchmark-report
19 Convergences, “Global Microfinance figures: What are the trends?” , Accessed (04/06/2021): https://www.
convergences.org/en/119115/
20 Reportlinker, “Global Microfinance Industry”, 2021, Accessed (03/06/2021): https://www.reportlinker.com/
p05799111/?utm_source=GNW
21 SIFMA, “2020 Capital Markets Fact Book”, 2020, Accessed (24/06/2021): https://www.sifma.org/wp-content/
uploads/2020/09/US-Fact-Book-2020-SIFMA.pdf
21
The Creditcoin Ecosystem
verification, how do you interface effectively with the off-chain world to assess risk
and enforce loan repayment?22)
In contrast, real-world lending necessarily relies on trust. Trust which is based on the
ability of lenders, or other investing parties, to gather reliable market information from
which to gauge risk. The most important form of information is credit scores/history.
Credit history on Creditcoin provides a source of credit information which can be reliably
used for verification purposes, given that a decentralized blockchain guarantees the
immutability and security of on-chain transaction data.
To this extent, the Creditcoin ecosystem recognizes the need for intermediaries who
assess risk and enforce repayment. As such, Gluwa will first be working to integrate
its foundational Creditcoin blockchain layer with existing financial institutions and
fintech lenders during phase 2. By focusing on existing institutions and adopting an
intermediated model which relies on formal B2B contracts, the Creditcoin network can
quickly achieve scale and mitigate counterparty risk.
Thus, Creditcoin can bridge the gap between crypto-lending and the real-world
economy in a way which current DeFi protocols are inherently unsuited towards.
22 Catherine Tucker, Christian Catalini, “What Blockchain Can’t Do”, Harvard Business Review, 2018, Accessed
(28/05/2021): https://hbsp.harvard.edu/tu/4167ec3d
23 Ernst Fehr, and Christian Zehnder, “Reputation and Credit Market Formation: How Relational Incentives and Legal
Contract Enforcement Interact”, IZA Institute of Labour Economics, Discussion Paper No. 4351, 2009
22
User Flow
Purpose
This section covers a step-by-step guide on how a Creditcoin user will use the
blockchain through a loan-cycle. From the perspective of an investor, how to create a
loan offer, find a fundraiser for the offer, learn the fundraiser’s credit history, and make
an investment. For a fundraiser, how to search for a loan offer, request for the loan and
make a repayment. The following outline portrays an abridged version of the User Flow.
(A more complete description of the User Flow is in the Appendix.)
23
User Flow
Fundraiser’s Flow
On the Creditcoin network, a fundraiser is an account that borrows funds from another
account.
1. Lock a Deal
2. Transfer the Repayment to the Investor
1. Negotiate an Exemption
2. Send a Partial Repayment
Investor/Lender’s Flow
24
User Flow
Collector’s Flow
I. Purchase a Bond
A collector can buy a bond from the investor to transfer the ownership of a loan,
bond, to his account. Once a bond is transferred to a collector, the repayment of
the loan will be sent to the collector. This allows collectors to acquire bonds closer
to maturity.
25
Creditcoin Tokenomics
The Total Creditcoin token supply will be 2 billion tokens. The token sale is capped at
200 million tokens (10% of total supply).
As stated in the user flow, Creditcoin is a proprietary utility token that fuses together a
decentralized credit investment economy. It facilitates transactions between lenders
and borrowers, and provides for the recording of transactions onto the Creditcoin
blockchain, thus creating an immutable record of credit histories for borrowers. As
the ecosystem/network grows, lenders will have an increasing array of borrowers with
scored credit histories to choose from, and vice versa.
For lenders, the purchase of creditcoin gives them access to the network, and therefore
allows them to add lending Ask orders into the market with the ability to close loan deals
with prospecting borrowers.
26
Creditcoin Tokenomics
CTC vs G-CRE
The Creditcoin ecosystem involves two distinct tokens which represent the same
underlying asset. CTC is the Creditcoin mainnet token used for transaction fees and
mining rewards (based on Substrate). G-CRE is the vesting and trading token (based on
ERC-20). G-CRE can be exchanged into CTC using a one-way hook.
CTC
• Creditcoin Mainnet Token: CTC is the token used on the Creditcoin Mainnet. It is
exclusive to Creditcoin’s Substrate blockchain network.
• Creditcoin Network Usage Fee: CTC is used as a transaction fee to add
transactions to the blockchain. CTC transaction fees are returned to the user after
one year (detailed explanation below).
• Mining Reward: Miner’s who run Creditcoin nodes receive CTC rewards in return.
G-CRE
• Ethereum ERC20 Token: G-CRE is based on the ERC20 Ethereum network
standard. It is not directly usable on the Creditcoin mainnet.
• One-way CTC swap: G-CRE can be exchanged/redeemed/swapped for CTC at
any time using a one-way hook. Note that CTC cannot currently be swapped for
G-CRE.
• Trading/Vesting token: G-CRE can currently be traded on exchanges. G-CRE is
the vesting token used by the Creditcoin foundation.
Highly variable transaction fees and token-price volatility create significant price
uncertainties for parties wanting to transact on current blockchain networks such as
Ethereum. Even parties who choose to stockpile a utility token at price X might not be
able to effectively offset the costs of higher transaction fees at point Y.
Instead of CTC being a single-use utility token like most utility coins, any CTC purchased
represents buying a permanent right to use the network. This was introduced as a
means to reduce price volatility, and therefore uncertainty, for parties seeking to
transact on Creditcoin.
Note however that this implementation is subject to change. In the long-term future, as
the mining rewards decrease over time, the introduction of more traditional transaction
27
Creditcoin Tokenomics
Limitations
Creditcoin’s token model does not wholly mitigate utility token price uncertainty. Parties
may always need to adjust their token usage, exposing them to long-term price volatility
when selling their tokens. This would be especially problematic for short-term users,
who are forced to factor in the higher costs associated with permanent network rights,
and thus face higher price uncertainty for short-term purchasing decisions.
For example, a credit union is experiencing a sudden surge in demand exceeding its
CTC transaction capacity. However, the firm has limited capital to spend on more CTC.
The firm is unsure of whether this spike in demand is part of a long-term trend or just
short-term. The firm may be reluctant to spend its limited capital on a token whose price
factors in several years of usage, and whose value could drop in the year before they
can re-sell it. In other words, there is a short-term flexibility problem.
Solution
When parties ‘rent’ CTC, they use it as a normal utility token in which price is determined
by short-term supply and demand. Equally, parties can make long-term transaction
capacity decisions to purchase CTC based on current market prices, operating with the
certainty they need.
Creditcoin Distribution
With any economies of scale, as more Creditcoin is released, distributed and circulates
into the economy, the Creditcoin lending ecosystem will continue to maximize its utility
as discussed in this whitepaper. Once a Creditcoin is distributed to any user, the user
has complete control over its Creditcoin, and therefore gains access and usage of the
Creditcoin network, exclusive of Gluwa or any other central organization or entity.
Token Allocation
Creditcoin tokens are distributed to the four major participant groups of the Creditcoin
Network:
28
Creditcoin Tokenomics
1. 70% to Creditcoin miners (as mining block rewards) – For provision of investment
funds, maintaining the blockchain, and running contracts.
2. 15% to Gluwa, Inc. (Genesis allocation; 6-year linear vesting) – For R&D, deployment,
business development, marketing, distribution, and administration costs.
3. 10% to Investors (Genesis allocation; 6-month to 3-year linear vesting) – For funding
network development, business development, partnerships, and support. Any unsold
tokens were remitted to the Creditcoin Foundation with a vesting period of 6 years.
4. 5% to the Creditcoin Foundation (Genesis allocation; 6-year linear vesting) – For
long-term network governance, partner support, academic grants, public works, and
community building.
For investors, the following vesting periods and discounts are available:
• 6 month vesting: 0% discount
• 1 year vesting: 7.5% discount
• 2 year vesting: 15% discount
• 3 year vesting: 20% discount
29
Creditcoin Tokenomics
Fundraising
Gluwa, Inc. requires significant funding to develop, launch, and grow the Creditcoin
Network. This includes all software development, including mining software, client
software, user interfaces and apps, network infrastructure and monitoring tools,
software that third-party wallets and exchanges need to support Creditcoin, integrations
with other investment software, tooling for web applications and dapps to use
Creditcoin, etc. We must deploy the network, facilitate its large-scale growth, market
to and bring onboard miners and clients, bring key partners into the ecosystem, and
various administrative tasks.
Token Sale
The essence of the token sale is to bring together a large, diverse group of investors
from around the world consisting of those who share the vision of building the most
powerful cloud credit network. This includes strategic investors who can add value,
and work for, the Creditcoin Network. Ideally, reaching as broad of an investor base as
possible; we want people and organizations from countries across the globe, working
in many different industries. If our investors represent many different groups, we feel
Creditcoin can quickly come to serve those users and spread across these networks.
We want investors who will share their skills, their knowledge, and their networks to
achieve success. For those inclined, we have structured the token sale with discounts to
reward those groups of investors that can help us build the network through a variety of
vesting periods. (As with any risky investment, Gluwa, Inc. and Creditcoin cannot make
guarantees or predictions of value.) We are, therefore, legally restricted to involve only
accredited investors (global investors accredited to US standards or similar—see the
legal section).
Caps
A soft cap is the amount received at which your crowd sale will be considered a
success. It is the minimum amount required by your project. A hard cap is defined as the
maximum amount a crowd sale will receive. This offering has a soft cap of USD 10 million
and a hard cap of USD 30 million.
30
Creditcoin Tokenomics
All 200 million tokens were purchased and introduced into the market.
If you would like to connect to the Creditcoin blockchain, run your own Server and Client
to mine Creditcoin, documentation attributed to Miners and setting up a node can be
found in our Creditcoin Miner’s Manual, and contains a brief description with FAQ.
As of the publication of this paper, a Creditcoin Mining Pool is still in the planning phase
toward its creation and implementation. The prospect of a Mining Pool allows groups of
miners to combine computational resources, strengthening their probability in finding
a block, and ultimately sharing in the rewards for participants in the pool. Please check
back at Creditcoin.org for further updates, feature releases, and news.
31
Creditcoin Tokenomics
Governance
The Creditcoin Foundation was founded to support the Creditcoin ecosystem and
related technologies. Tae Oh is the current director of the Creditcoin Foundation. The
foundation will pursue a non-profit organizational model.
The foundation does not control Creditcoin, nor is it the only organization that can
engage in critical development of Creditcoin-related technologies. The Creditcoin
Foundation is the first of an open ecosystem of organizations, individuals, and
companies that support Creditcoin’s evolution and development.
The foundation’s mission is to do what is best for Creditcoin’s long-term success. Our
role is to allocate resources to critical projects, to be a valued voice within the Creditcoin
ecosystem, and to advocate for Creditcoin to the outside world. The Creditcoin
foundation will fund and support projects which improve the Creditcoin ecosystem, such
as bug bounty programs or community projects.
Gluwa, Inc. is the technology provider of Creditcoin. The company maintains the
Creditcoin blockchain, the Creditcoin token and other Creditcoin properties (The
Creditcoin homepage, Creditcoin Explorer, Documentation and all social channels).
The company is not the only organization that can contribute to the development of
Creditcoin-related technologies.
Any updates or software upgrades made to the Creditcoin blockchain are currently
managed by developers within Gluwa, Inc. Creditcoin is a public blockchain, and is
built on top of the Substrate Project. The Creditcoin blockchain employs a Proof-
of-Work consensus algorithm. If the need arises, the Creditcoin Foundation is not
opposed to pursuing alternative consensus mechanisms given their future advantages
or efficiencies, although it has no current plans to do so. A more detailed look at its
software architecture is appended below in the Appendix.
All decisions pertaining to the Creditcoin blockchain, token and properties are currently
made by members of the Creditcoin Foundation and its partners. The Creditcoin
Foundation complies with all legal and regulatory requirements stipulated by the
countries where it operates. As the number of stakeholders within the network expands,
The Creditcoin Foundation intends to modify this governance structure in order to
integrate a wider range of stakeholders into the decision-making process.
32
Creditcoin Tokenomics
Currently, digital tokens are being closely and regularly scrutinized by various regulatory
bodies around the world, including but not limited to the SEC, European Securities and
Markets Authority, and each individual state in the United States. Law regarding ICO’s
is an evolving area of law, and there is no clear guidance from regulatory agencies,
courts, and laws regarding legally-compliant practices for ICO’s. As a result, the future
evolution of the law and potential consequences are too speculative for the Gluwa to
reasonably foresee and act upon. However, Gluwa has taken good-faith measures to
account for the evolving law and rules on ICO’s and in an effort to comply with such
law, but there is still substantial risk surrounding legal compliance for any ICO in light
of the little legal guidance. There is a substantial risk that in numerous jurisdictions,
including the United States, Creditcoin may be deemed to be a security, meaning such
a token must be registered or comply with an applicable exemption from registration.
For example, applicable securities laws may limit the ability to hold more than certain
amounts of Creditcoin; restrict the ability to transfer Creditcoin; require disclosure or
other conditions on you in connection with any sale of Creditcoin; and may restrict the
businesses that facilitate exchanges or effect transfers of your Creditcoin. Every user,
purchaser, and holder of a Creditcoin is required to make diligent inquiry to determine
if the acquisition, possession and transfer of Creditcoin is legal in its jurisdiction and to
comply with all applicable laws and any of Gluwa’s terms and conditions. Creditcoins
and the Creditcoin network may be eliminated by future regulation or legal actions. In
response to such action, Gluwa may take actions that adversely impact you and the
Creditcoins you hold, including: (a) ceasing operations or restricting access in certain
jurisdictions, (b) voiding, refunding or not processing token purchases, or (c) ceasing
operations entirely.
Each token holder is: (a) if in the United States, or a U.S. Person (as defined in
Regulation S under U.S. Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”)), an accredited
investor (as defined in Regulation D under the Securities Act) or (b) if outside of the
United States, a non-U.S. Person who is not purchasing for the account or benefit of
a U.S. Person (as defined under Regulation S under the Securities Act). Each token
holder of Creditcoin is sophisticated in terms of investment, business, and/or blockchain
technology, or be able to fend for themselves or have access to the information that
can allow such purchasers to fend for themselves with regard to the subject matter of
Creditcoin.
33
Team
Creditcoin was founded jointly by two companies, Gluwa and Aella. Gluwa is the
technology provider of Creditcoin and Aella is the initial distributor.
Gluwa
Gluwa is a global team distributed across the US, Canada, South Korea and several other
countries. Our team of industry experts have years of experience working in industries
including Blockchain Technology, Cryptocurrency Trading, Financial Services, Computer
Science, High Traffic Systems, and Clinical Psychology.
34
Team
[ OpenFi Partners ]
35
Team
Aella
Aella exists to simplify instant credit & payment solutions for emerging markets by
offering; instant loans, bill payments, micro-health insurance, investment and peer-to-
peer money transfer services. Our products are built to make an impact at the frontier of
financial inclusion across the region.
36
Creditcoin on the Web
Public Exchanges
OKEX
https://www.okex.com/markets/prices/creditcoin-ctc
Bittrex Global
https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-CTC
GOPAX
https://www.gopax.co.kr/exchange/ctc-btc
Bithumb
https://www.bithumb.com/trade/order/CTC_KRW
Upbit
https://upbit.com/exchange?code=CRIX.UPBIT.BTC-CTC
MEXC Global
https://www.mexc.com/ko-KR/exchange/CTC_USDT
KUCOIN
https://www.kucoin.com/trade/CTC-USDT
POLONIEX
https://poloniex.com/exchange/USDT_CTC
Gate.io
https://www.gate.io/trade/CTC_USDT
Bybit
https://www.bybit.com/en-US/trade/spot/CTC/USDT
Huobi Global
https://www.huobi.com/en-us/exchange/ctc_usdt
37
Creditcoin on the Web
Social Media:
• Creditcoin on Twitter: Creditcoin (@creditcoin)
• Creditcoin on Reddit: r/Creditcoin
• Creditcoin on YouTube: Creditcoin
• Creditcoin on Facebook: Creditcoin - Home
• Creiditcoin on Discord: https://discord.gg/3XPV7uTqsn
• Creditcoin on Medium: https://medium.com/creditcoin-foundation
• Creditcoin on Telegram: Contact @CreditcoinOfficial
• Creditcoin Blog: https://blog.creditcoin.org/
38
Appendix
User Flow
Fundraiser’s Flow
On the Creditcoin network, a fundraiser is an account that borrows funds from another
account.
A Fundraiser will start a loan-cycle by creating a bid order describing the loan
condition he wants. The bid order is announced to the Creditcoin network and attract
potential investors.
3. Create a Deal
If a fundraiser likes an offer he received, he can accept the offer by sending a
corresponding deal to the investor. The deal will have the exact loan condition
described in the offer. The fundraiser will pay Creditcoin as a transaction fee to
the Creditcoin network to send the deal.
A fundraiser can repay the full amount to finish the loan-cycle without the
involvement of the investor.
1. Lock a Deal
Before making a repayment, the fundraiser has to block another account from
making any change to the deal. Else, we have a potential concurrency problem.
The fundraiser may be closing the deal at the same time as the ownership of
the loan is sold to another account. In this case, there may be two transfers
39
User Flow
registered against the same deal order. The Creditcoin network prevents the
problem by requiring a fundraiser to lock the deal before making a repayment.
The fundraiser will pay Creditcoin as a transaction fee to the Creditcoin network
to lock the deal.
Investor’s Flow
40
User Flow
offer. The ask order is announced to the Creditcoin network and attract potential
investment deals.
41
User Flow
network. The investor will pay Creditcoin as a transaction fee to the Creditcoin
network to complete the deal.
A fundraiser can repay the full amount to finish the loan-cycle without the
involvement of the investor. However, an investor may choose to exempt a partial
amount of the repayment.
42
User Flow
Collector’s Flow
I. Purchase a Bond
A collector can buy a bond from the investor to transfer the ownership of a loan,
bond, to his account. Once a bond is transferred to a collector, the repayment of the
loan will be sent to the collector. This allows collectors to acquire bonds closer to
maturity.
43
User Flow
Conclusion
Creditcoin network has been built to support various investment scenarios and assists in
decision making and transitioning of the relevant artifacts through their lifecycle.
44
Software Architecture
Introduction
Purpose
Scope
Overview
The Creditcoin system is a decentralized credit network for investors and borrowers and
to facilitate efficient and safe transactions between parties. A special cryptocurrency
named Creditcoin is used as an aid in performing transactions and incentivizing parties
to support, develop and expand the network and keep it operational.
45
Software Architecture
Use Cases
46
Software Architecture
47
Software Architecture
The Creditcoin system is built on top of the Substrate project, which provides an
implementation of a distributed ledger and interoperation between distributed
components of the network. The system provides:
48
Software Architecture
Processes
Each validator node runs a validator, Creditcoin Transaction Family Processor, Settings
Transaction Family Processor (stock, not shown in the diagram), and Creditcoin
consensus plugin. A gateway process runs to allow communication with other
cryptocurrency networks. Client applications send requests to a validator to perform
operations on data for a given transaction family; the validator then dispatches the
request to a relevant processor. The processor submits the transaction to the ledger.
Clients read the current state of data that has been made persistent by recording it on
the ledger.
49
Software Architecture
Deployment
In the final distributed system, client applications can connect with validators across
local or global TCP networks. Any validator accepts transactions from one or more
clients and clients sends transactions to one or more validators.
Implementation Notes
The initial validator network operates on Ubuntu boxes running in Azure. The transaction
families were developed and tested on Windows 10, but also runs on Ubuntu. The
development language for Creditcoin transaction family is C++; clients are implemented
in C#, while the consensus is implemented in Python.
50
Software Architecture
Configuration Notes
The initial setup runs with a temporary transaction family processor that sets up the
Creditcoin components on the ledger. The system is configured to run a predefined set
of transaction family processors.
51
Creditcoin Workflow
This document covers a step-by-step guide on how you can use the Creditcoin network
and Creditcoin through a command-line client. Refer to the User Flow section to
understand the what role each command plays in a loan-cycle.
Note that you need to pay a transaction fee in Creditcoin per each command.
G-CRE is transferred from ERC20 by running the ‘exchange()’ method on the Creditcoin
smart contract and collecting the coins on the Creditcoin network.
‘ethereum’ is the blockchain, ‘address’ is a user’s ethereum address, and ‘main’ is the
network id.
To find out the address id for the registered address a user can run the following
command:
$ show Address 0 ethereum address main
Where 0 is the sighash that identifies the interactive user and other parameters are the
same as provided for registration.
52
Creditcoin Workflow
Where ‘addressId’ is the result of the previous show command and ‘amount’ is the
amount not exceeding the amount of ERC20 tokens on Ethereum.
Alternatively, the user can manually call ‘exchange()’ on Creditcoin Ethereum smart
contract, write down the transaction id and call the following command:
$ creditcoin CollectCoins addressId amount transactionId
Now the user can display the Creditcoin balance with the following command:
$ show Balance 0
Alternatively, if the user knows a sighash of another user, the user can run the following
command:
$ show Balance eccd3cc374e641b8fabf12eff4d5e3506e...
53
Creditcoin Workflow
An investor can search for matching orders with the following command:
$ show MatchingOrders 0
Where 0 is a 0-sighash
For each matching pair of orders, the output will be a list of pairs of the respective order
ids:
askOrderId bidOrderId
An investor can check the fundraiser’s credit history with the following command:
$ show CreditHistory sighash
Create an Offer
Where ‘askOrderId’ and ‘bidOrderId’ are the output of the previous ‘show
MatchingOrders’ command and ‘expiration’ is the number of blocks the offer is valid for.
A fundraiser can check for current offers with the following command:
$ show CurrentOffers 0
54
Creditcoin Workflow
Create Deals
An investor can check for new deals with the following command:
$ show NewDeals 0
To complete a deal Investor has to register a transfer with the following command:
$ ethereum RegisterTransfer 0 orderId
This command will create an Ethereum transaction sending the amount of Ether
specified in the BidOrder to the address specified in the BidOrder from the address
specified in the AskOrder.
Note that the actual transfer can happen elsewhere as soon as it satisfies the
requirements, but it still has to be registered with Creditcoin, there is a special form of
RegisterTransfer for that - creditcoin RegisterTransfer gain orderId txId (note it’s not
etherium but creditcoin command and takes additional parameter txid).
Complete a Deal
Where ‘dealOrderId’ is the deal being completed and ‘transferId’ is the loan transfer.
Lock a Deal
To close a deal Fundraiser has to lock the deal first with the following command:
55
Creditcoin Workflow
Close a Deal
Where ‘dealOrderId’ is the deal being closed and ‘transferId’ is the repayment transfer.
Exempt Loans
Where ‘dealOrderId’ is the deal being exempted and ‘transferId’ is a partial repayment
transfer.
Transfer Loans
A third party (collector) may offer to transfer the loan ownership by creating a
“RepaymentOrder” using the following command:
$ creditcoin AddRepaymentOrder dealId collectorAddressId amount expiration
Where ‘dealId’ is the id of the deal order, ‘collectorAddressId’ is the address of the new
owner, ‘amount’ is the amount offered for transferring the loan.
Repay Loans
An investor can check for new RepaymentOrders using the following command:
$ show NewRepaymentOrders 0
56
Creditcoin Workflow
A collector can check for accepted RepaymentOrders using the following command:
$ show CurrentRepaymentOrders 0
A collector can close the RepaymentOrder by registering a transfer and using the
following command:
$ creditcoin CloseRepaymentOrder repaymentOrderId transferId
Demonstration
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpvVrChDzZE
Please refer to the live demonstration of the Creditcoin command-line client above for
more information.
57
Citations
Babajide Fowowe, “Access to finance and firm performance: Evidence from African
countries”, Review of Development Finance, Vol. 7 No. 1, 2017, pp.6-17
Berrak Büyükkarabacak & Nevan Valev, “Credit Information sharing and banking crises:
An empirical investigation”, Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp.788-800,
2012.
Catalini, Christian, and Joshua S. Gans. 2016. “Some Simple Economics of the
Blockchain.” NBER Working Paper No. 22952. Accessed (21/05/2021): http://www.nber.
org/papers/w22952.
Catherine Tucker, Christian Catalini, “What Blockchain Can’t Do”, Harvard Business
Review, 2018, Accessed (28/05/2021): https://hbsp.harvard.edu/tu/4167ec3d
Cathy Barrera, “The Blockchain Effect: Network Effects without Market Power Costs”,
Accessed (24/05/2021): https://medium.com/mit-cryptoeconomics-lab/the-blockchain-
effect-86bd01006ec2
Ernst Fehr, and Christian Zehnder, “Reputation and Credit Market Formation: How
Relational Incentives and Legal Contract Enforcement Interact”, IZA Institute of Labour
Economics, Discussion Paper No. 4351, 2009
Maik Dierkes, Carsten Erner, Thomas Langer, Lars Norden, “Business credit information
sharing and default risk of private firms”, Journal of Banking & Finance, Volume 37, Issue
8, 2013, pp.2867-2878
MIX, “2015 Global Outreach & Financial Performance Benchmark Report”, Accessed
(04/06/2021):https://www.themix.org/publications/2015-global-outreach-and-financial-
performance-benchmark-report
58
Citations
Samuel Fosu, Albert Danso, Henry Agyei-Boapeah, Collins G. Ntim, & Emmanuel
Adegbite, “Credit Information sharing and loan default in developing countries: the
moderating effect of baking market concentration and national governance quality”,
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, pp.55-103, 2020
SIFMA, “2020 Capital Markets Fact Book”, 2020, Accessed (24/06/2021): https://www.
sifma.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/US-Fact-Book-2020-SIFMA.pdf
Svetlana Andrianova, Badi Baltagi, Panicos Demtriades, & David Fielding, “Why do
African Banks Lend so Little”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 77, No. 3,
pp.339-359, 2015
Tullio Jappelli, and Marco Pagano, “Information Sharing, Lending and Defaults: Cross
country Evidence”, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance, Working Paper No. 22,
1999
59