3E DR - SKJain Orgn Forms
3E DR - SKJain Orgn Forms
3E DR - SKJain Orgn Forms
2. Limited Capital:
The second disadvantage of the sole proprietorship is its limited
ability to raise financial capital. This limitation makes it difficult
for sole proprietorships are small businesses. Financial capital for
the expansion of the company can be raised in several ways in the
case of sole proprietorship. The owner can choose to flow profits
back into business.
The owner can use the personal wealth to invest in the company, or
the owner can borrow money from relatives, friends, and lending
institutions. The ability of the owner to borrow is determined by
the owner’s earning capacity (which will depend upon the success
of the business) and personal wealth.
Lending money to an individual proprietorship can be risky
because the success of the business depends very much on one
person, and if that person dies or becomes incapacitated, the
lender will have to stand in line with other creditors.
2
3. Non-permanence:
2A. Partnership
A partnership is much like an individual proprietorship but with more
than one owner (2 to 20).
One partner may make all the business decisions, while the other partner
(a “silent partner”) may simply provide financial capital. A partnership
can be a corner petrol pump owned by three friends or brothers or a
nationally known law firm or brokerage house.
Advantages:
1. Similar:
The advantages of partnerships are much like those of the sole
proprietorship. Partnerships are easy to set up. The profits of the
company accrue to the partners and are taxed only once as personal
income.
2. Specialization:
Unlike the sole proprietorship, however, there is a greater opportunity to
specialize and divide managerial responsibility because the partnership
3
consists of two or more individuals. The partner who is the better
salesperson will be in charge of the sales department. The partner who is
a talented mechanical engineer will be in charge of production. “Two
heads are better than one”, when each has different talents that are
useful to the business enterprise.
3. Large Capital Base:
(Two persons’ capital)
Second a partnership can raise more financial capital than a sole
proprietorship because the wealth and borrowing ability of more than
one person can be mobilized. In fact, if a large number of wealthy
partners can be assembled, such partnership can indeed raise huge sums
of capital.
Disadvantages:
1. Limited Capital (of only the no. of partners):
The ability of the partnership to raise financial capital is limited by the
amount of money the partners can raise out of their personal wealth or
from borrowing.
2. Unlimited Liability:
The partners have unlimited liability for the debts of the partnership. A
business debt incurred by any of the partners is the responsibility of the
partnership. Each partner stands to lose personal wealth if the company
is a commercial failure. Clearly, a conflict in goals can arise because the
richer partner may be more risk-averse than the poorer partner.
3. Complicated Decision-making Process:
“Two heads are better than one” if the two heads agree. But, if partners
fail to agree, decision-making can become quite complicated. In a
partnership where all partners are responsible for management
decisions, there is no longer one single person who is in charge.
Partnerships can be immobilized when partners disagree on a
fundamental policy. Partnerships involve a more complicated decision--
making process that can become more complicated as the number of
partners grows.
4. Instability:
Partnerships can also be unstable. If disagreement over policy causes
one partner to withdraw from the partnership, the partnership must be
reorganized. When one partner dies, again the partnership agreement
must be renegotiated.
4
5. Great risk:
Finally, partnerships can involve a considerable risk for the individual
partners. The sole proprietor does bear unlimited liability for the debts
of the company, but at least the owner is the one who makes the business
decision that may turn out to be bad. In case of partnership, each partner
is responsible for business debts incurred by another partner even if that
partner acted without the consent of the other partners.
Advantages:
(a) Liability limited to the assets of the company.
5
Disadvantages:
(a) Statutory requirement of audit of accounts
(b) Requirement of rules and procedures
(c) More govt. regulations
(d) Closing the company requires govt. approval
4. Corporation:
A. Closely Held Companies
According to state and Central laws, the corporation has the legal status
of a fictional individual. Officers of the corporation can act in the name
of the corporation without being personally liable for its debts. If
corporate officers commit criminal acts, however, they can be
prosecuted.
If a person owns 1,00,000 shares of PAL stock and there are 630 million
PAL shares outstanding, then the person would own only 0.016 per cent
of PAL. Owners of shares of stock have the right to vote for the board of
directors and to vote on special referenda at the annual meeting of the
corporation.
The shareholder who owns 1 percent of the stock of PAL will receive 1 per
cent of the dividends; the PAL management choose to pay to its
shareholders out of profits. In the case of the sole proprietorship and
partnership, the owners decide what to do with the profits.
8
extreme circumstances, it can become worthless).
New shareholders can also be brought into the operation because they
know that the existence of the corporation is not dependent upon the
individuals that currently run the corporation. Continuity also makes it
easier for the firm to hire a carrier-minded and talented labour force.
If the corporation chooses to plough back all profits into the company,
corporate profits will be taxed only once, but if it distributes some of its
profits to shareholders in the form of dividends, shareholders must pay
personal income tax on these dividends. Corporate profits can, therefore,
be taxed twice, first by the corporate income tax and second by the
personal income tax on dividends.
2. Complexity:
A second disadvantage of the corporation is its complexity. A modern
corporation can have thousands or even millions of different owners
(shareholders). Often ownership is so dispersed that it is difficult to get
the owners to agree (or even assemble), even when important issues are
at stake. Power struggles among shareholding groups can break out and
paralyze decision-making.
3. Conflicting objectives:
A third disadvantage of the corporation is the possibility of
conflicting objectives between the principals (the
shareholders) and the agents (the corporation’s professional
management team). Shareholders are interested in maximizing the
long-run profits of the corporation (thereby getting the best return from
their shares of stock). The professional management team may be more
interested in preserving their jobs or in maximizing their personal
income or perquisites than in profit maximization.
10
MNC & TNC
11