Topic-Evidence Based Nursing Practice And: Best Practices
Topic-Evidence Based Nursing Practice And: Best Practices
Topic-Evidence Based Nursing Practice And: Best Practices
BEST PRACTICES
UNIT- BIO-PSYCHO SOCIAL PATHOLOGY
SUBJECT- ADVANCE NURSING PRACTICE
DATE OF SUBMISSION: -
TABLE OF CONTENT
SR. CONTENT PAGE NO.
NO.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
EVIDENCE BASED NURSING PRACTICE
INTRODUCTION-
- During 1980s the term “evidence-based medicine” emerged to describe the approach
that used scientific evidence to determine the best practice. Evidence based practice
movement started in England in the early 1990s.
- Evidence-based medicine (EBM) or evidence-based practice (EBP), is the judicious
use of the best current evidence in making decisions about the care of the individual
patient.
- Evidence-based practice represents both an ideology and a method. The ideology
springs from the ethical principle that clients deserve to be provided with the most
effective interventions possible. The method of EBP is the way we go about finding
and then implementing those interventions.
- Today evidence based practice is becoming a goal of all health care institutions and an
expectation of professional nurses who are expected to use current evidence when
caring for patients.
DEFINITIONS-
- For making sure that each client get the best possible services.
- Update knowledge and is essential for lifelong learning.
- Provide clinical judgment.
- Improvement care provided and save lives.
GOAL OF EBP-
- Provide practicing nurse the evidence based data to deliver effective care.
- Resolve problem in clinical setting.
- Achieve excellence in care delivery.
- Reduce the variations in nursing care and assist with efficient and effective decision
making.(3)
EBP is a systematic approach to rational decision making that facilitates achievement of best
practices. A step by step approach ensures that you obtain the strongest available evidence to
apply in patient care. There are six steps of EBP –
1. Ask a clinical question- question what does not make sense to you and what need to
be clarified. Think about a problem or area of interest that time consuming, costly or
not logical. Use problem and knowledge focused triggers to think critically about
clinical and operational nursing unit’s issues.
A problem – focused trigger is one you face while caring for a patient or a trend you
see on a nursing unit.
A knowledge- focused trigger is a question regarding new information available on a
topic.
Ask clinical questions in PICOT format. Inquiries in this format take into account
patient population of interest (P), intervention or area of interest (I), comparison
intervention or group (C), outcome (O) and time (T).
The PICOT format provides an efficient framework for searching electronic
databases, one designed to retrieve only those articles relevant to the clinical
questions. Using the case scenario on rapid response team as an example, the way to
frame a question about whether use of such teams would result in positive outcomes
would be: “In acute care hospitals (patient population), how does having a rapid
response team(intervention) compared with not having a response team(comparison)
affect the number of cardiac arrest (outcome) during a three period (time)?” (1)
2. Search for the best evidence- the search for evidence to inform clinical practice is
tremendously streamlined when questions are asked in PICOT format. If the nurse in
the rapid response scenario had simply typed “what is the impact of having a rapid
response team?” into the search field of the data-base, the result would have been
hundreds of abstracts, most of them irrelevant. Using the PICOT format helps to
identify key words or phrases that, when entered successively and then combined,
Expedite the location of relevant articles in massive research database such as
MEDLINE or CINHAL. For the PICOT question on raid response teams, the first key
phrase to be entered into the database would be acute care hospitals, a common
subject that will most likely result in thousands of citations and abstracts. The second
term to be searched would be rapid response team, followed by cardiac arrests and
the remaining terms in the PICOT question. The last step of the search is to combine
the result of searches for each of the terms. This method narrows the results to
articles pertinent to the clinical question, often resulting in fewer than 20. It also
helps to set limits on the final search, such as “human subjects” or “English”, to
eliminate animal studies or articles in foreign languages.
3. Critically appraise the evidence- once articles are selected for review, they must be
rapidly appraised to determine which are most relevant, valid, reliable and applicable
to the clinical question. These studies are the “keeper studies.” One reason clinicians
worry that they don’t have time to implement EBP is that many have been taught a
laborious critiquing process, including the use of numerous questions designed to
reveal every element of a study. Rapid critical appraisal uses three important
questions to evaluate a study’s worth.
Are the results of the study valid? This question of study validity
centers on whether the research methods are rigorous enough to render
findings as close to the truth as possible. For example, did the
researchers randomly assign subjects to treatment or control groups
ensure that they shared key characteristics prior to treatment? Were
valid and reliable instruments used to measure key outcome?
What are the results and are they important? For intervention
studies, this question of study reliability addresses whether the
intervention worked, its impact on outcomes, and the likelihood of
obtaining similar results in the clinicians own practice settings. For
qualitative studies, this includes assessing whether the research
approach fits the purpose of the study, along with evaluating other
aspects of the research such as whether the result can be confirmed.
Will the results help me care for my patients? This question of study
applicability covers clinical considerations such as whether subjects in
the study are similar to one’s own patients, whether benefits outweigh
risks, feasibility and cost-effectiveness and patient values and
preferences.
After appraising each study the next step is to synthesize the
studies to determine if they come to similar conclusions, thus
supporting an EBP decision or change.
4. Integrate the evidence with clinical expertise and patient preferences and values-
research evidence alone is not sufficient to justify a change in practice. Clinical
expertise based on patient assessment, laboratory data and data from outcomes
management programs, as well as patient’s preferences and values are important
component of EBP. There is no magic formula for how to weigh each of these
elements, implementations of EBP is highly influenced by institutional and clinical
variables. for example, say there is a strong body Of evidence showing reduced
incidence of depression in burn patients if they receive eight sessions of cognitive
behavioral therapy prior to hospital discharge. You want your patients to have this
therapy and so do they. but budget constraints at your hospital prevent hiring
therapist to offer the treatment. this resource deficit hinders implementation of EBP.
6. Disseminate EBP results- clinicians can achieve wonderful outcomes for their
patients through EBP but they often to share their experiences with colleagues and
their own or other Healthcare organization. this leads to needless duplication of
effort and perpetuates clinical approaches that are not evidence based. Among ways
to disseminate successful initiative are EBP In your institution, presentations at
local, regional and national conferences and reports in Peer reviewed journals
professional newsletters and Publication for general audiences .
SOURCES OF EVIDENCE
- research evidence has assumed priority over other sources of evidence in the delivery of
evidence based healthcare.
- it includes
1. Filtered Resources- clinical expert and subject specialist pose a question and then
synthesis evidence to States conclusion based on available research. these sources are
helpful because the literature has been searched and result evaluated to provide an
answer to clinical question.
2. Unfiltered Resources (Primary Literature)- it provides most recent information
examples MEDLINE CINHAL etc provide primary and secondary literature for
medicine.
3. Clinical Experiences- knowledge professional practice and life experiences makes
up the second part in the evidence based person, centered care.
4. Knowledge From Patients- delivered from patients knowledge of themselves their
bodies and social lives.
5. Knowledge From Local Context-
-Audit and performance data
-Patient stories and narrative
-knowledge about the culture of the organization and individuals within it
-social and professional network
-information from feedback
-local and national policy
HIERARCHY OF EVIDENCE
MODELS OF EBP-
1. John Hopkins Nursing EBP Model- used as a framework to guide the synthesis
and translation of evidence into practice.
There are three phases of the JHNEBP model-
i. The identification of an answerable question.
ii. A systematic review and synthesis of both research and non research
evidence.
iii. Translation include implantation of the practice change as a pilot study,
measurement of outcomes and dissemination of findings.
o Hand hygiene.
o Barrier protection.
o Decontamination
o Antibiotic prophylaxis
A nurse should conduct hand hygiene after every interaction with a patient and when
entering and exiting a patient’s room. Barrier protection includes wearing gloves,
gowns, masks and goggles. Decontamination of the room and equipment is necessary
in reducing and preventing the spread of infection. Antibiotic stewardship is critical to
stopping the overuse of the treatment. Antibiotics should only be used when other
methods fail and the therapy should be closely monitored. In extreme cases, patients
with an active infection may have to be isolated.
RESEARCH FINDINGS-
1. Translating research into practice: case study of a community based
dementia care giver intervention.(Mittleman MS, BartlelsSJ)
Evidence from the randomized clinical trials has demonstrated the effectiveness of
providing psychosocial interventions for caregivers to lesson their burden. this
case study describes outcomes of the implementation of an evidence based
intervention in a multisite program in Minnesota. Consistent with the original
randomized clinical trial of the intervention, assessment of this program showed
decreased depression and distress among caregivers. Some of the challenges in the
community setting included having caregivers complete the full six counseling
sessions and acquiring complete outcome data. Given the challenges faced in the
community setting, web-based training for providers may be a cost-effective way
to realize the maximum benefits of the intervention for vulnerable adults with
dementia and their families.(6)