Project AL RYADA PROJECT TRIPOLI

Address LYBIA
Report A-L5-25
GRAITEC INNOVATION Designed by Date
www.graitec.com Verified by Date
17 Burospace 91572 Bièvres
Revision 0 Drawing L5 FLOOR

Reinforced concrete beam

Table of Contents

1 Geometry description............................................................................................................. 1
2 Loads and combinations......................................................................................................... 2
3 Global assumptions................................................................................................................. 4
3.1 Materials.....................................................................................................................................4
3.2 Concrete covers..........................................................................................................................5
4 Creep coefficient..................................................................................................................... 5
5 Fire resistance minimum conditions...................................................................................... 5
6 Internal forces......................................................................................................................... 6
6.1 Envelope of ULS combinations..................................................................................................6
7 Longitudinal reinforcement................................................................................................... 7
8 Transversal reinforcement..................................................................................................... 8
9 Stresses verification................................................................................................................ 9
9.1 Envelope of SLS-CRQ combinations.........................................................................................9
9.2 Envelope of SLS-FRQ combinations........................................................................................10
9.3 Envelope of SLS-QP combinations..........................................................................................11
10 Crack width check.............................................................................................................. 12
11 Anchorage calculation......................................................................................................... 13
12 Support strut verification................................................................................................... 14
13 Support reactions................................................................................................................ 14
14 Deflections........................................................................................................................... 15

1 Geometry description
Element: Main beam 25
Drawing: L5 FLOOR
Span: 1
Length Left flange thickness
Width of the beam web Left flange width
Total height of the beam Right flange thickness
Width of the left support Right flange width
Width of the right support
Total width of T - section
Span: 2
Length Left flange thickness
Width of the beam web Left flange width
Total height of the beam Right flange thickness
Width of the left support Right flange width
Width of the right support
Total width of T - section
Span: 3
Length Left flange thickness
Width of the beam web Left flange width
Total height of the beam Right flange thickness
Width of the left support Right flange width
Width of the right support
Total width of T - section

2 Loads and combinations

Load cases description

Title
1 Dead loads 1 - - - 1.1 1.35 0.9 1
4 Live loads 1 0.7 0.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 2 of 101** Expression is

faulty **
 Punctual loads
Load Span Case F x h' b'
ID ID ID (kN) (mm)
1 3 1 155.32 2200 450 600
2 3 4 16.64 2200 450 600

Uniform linear loads

Load Span Case f x L h'
ID ID ID (kN/m) (mm)
1 1 1 15.97 1865 310 -
2 1 4 5.30 1865 310 -
3 1 1 11.77 65 3910 -
4 1 1 15.98 5715 1195 -
5 1 4 5.30 5715 1195 -
6 1 1 11.77 3915 4795 -
7 1 1 11.77 8935 1975 -

Variable loads
Load Span Case f₁ f₂ x L h'
ID ID ID (kN/m) (mm)
1 1 1 0.00 15.97 65 1800 -
2 1 4 0.00 5.30 65 1800 -
3 1 1 15.97 0.00 2175 1800 -
4 1 4 5.30 0.00 2175 1800 -
5 1 1 0.00 17.34 65 1955 -
6 1 4 0.00 5.75 65 1955 -
7 1 1 17.34 0.00 2020 1955 -
8 1 4 5.75 0.00 2020 1955 -
9 1 1 0.00 15.98 3915 1800 -
10 1 4 0.00 5.30 3915 1800 -
11 1 1 15.98 0.00 6910 1800 -
12 1 4 5.30 0.00 6910 1800 -
13 1 1 0.00 21.27 3915 2398 -
14 1 4 0.00 7.05 3915 2398 -
15 1 1 21.27 0.00 6313 2397 -

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 3 of 101** Expression is

faulty **
 16 1 4 7.05 0.00 6313 2397 -
17 1 1 0.00 9.21 8935 1038 -
18 1 4 0.00 3.05 8935 1038 -
19 1 1 9.21 0.00 9973 1037 -
20 1 4 3.05 0.00 9973 1037 -
21 1 1 0.00 9.21 8935 1038 -
22 1 4 0.00 3.05 8935 1038 -
23 1 1 9.21 0.00 9973 1038 -
24 1 4 3.05 0.00 9973 1038 -
Combinations description
ID Combination Code Type
101 1.35x[1 G] ECELUSTRQ ULS
102 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[4 Q] ECELUSTRQ ULS
103 1x[1 G]+1x[4 Q] ECELSCRQQ SLS
104 1x[1 G]+0.5x[4 Q] ECELSFRQQ SLS
105 1x[1 G]+0.3x[4 Q] ECELSQPMQ SLS

3 Global assumptions
Concrete design calculation: EN1992-1-1 / EN1992-1-2.
Loadings and combinations: EN1990 / EN1991.
Longitudinal reinforcement design: EN1992-1-1 / 6.1 - 'Limit reduced moment' method
Transversal reinforcement design: Standard method (EN1992-1-1, 6.2.2 / 6.2.3).
Concrete: No concrete with silica fume
No high performance concrete
Reinforcement diagram: Bilinear stress-strain diagram
Fire resistance: R 60
Self weight: Self weight considered without compression flanges.
Calculation section type: T-section design.

3.1 Materials
Concrete quality (EN1992-1-1 / 3.1) Steel grade (EN1992-1-1 / Section 3 / Annex C)
Span 1: Concrete class: C30/37 Span 1: Steel class: B500A
Span 2: Concrete class: C30/37 Span 2: Steel class: B500A
Span 3: Concrete class: C30/37 Span 3: Steel class: B500A

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 4 of 101** Expression is

faulty **
3.2 Concrete covers

Exposure class (4.2) XC1

Structural class, according to Table 4.3 S4

Concrete covers (4.4.1)

Concrete covers
Top Bottom Lateral
Cover Cover Cover
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
30 25 14 30 25 14 30 25 14

4 Creep coefficient

The effects of creep are not taken into account.

5 Fire resistance minimum conditions

Fire resistance class R60

Span 1
Minimum width verification Passed

Minimum concrete cover Passed

Span 2
Minimum width verification Passed

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 5 of 101** Expression is

faulty **
Minimum concrete cover Passed

Span 3
Minimum width verification Passed

Minimum concrete cover Passed

6 Internal forces

Synthetic values table

Span - Section Abscissa Face

(m) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (kN) (kN⋅m)
1 - Left support 0.00 Top -13.87 -10.07 -9.19 -8.83 80.60 0.00
Bottom 15.67 11.41 10.51 10.16 0.00 0.00
1 - Right support 3.60 Top -49.45 -35.34 -29.54 -27.21 0.00 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -114.10 0.00
1 - MInf 1.62 Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.00
Bottom 92.44 67.16 61.26 58.90 -3.21 0.00
1 - VMax 3.60 Top -49.45 -35.34 -29.54 -27.21 0.00 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -114.10 0.00
1 - wk Max 2.59 Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Bottom 56.38 40.94 37.23 35.74 -73.27 0.00
1 - Max Concrete Stress 1.62 Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.00
Bottom 92.44 67.16 61.26 58.90 -3.21 0.00
1 - Max Steel Stress 1.62 Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.00
Bottom 92.44 67.16 61.26 58.90 -3.21 0.00
1 - Max Deflection 0.00 Top -13.87 -10.07 -9.19 -8.83 80.60 0.00
Bottom 15.67 11.41 10.51 10.16 0.00 0.00

6.1 Envelope of ULS combinations

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 6 of 101** Expression is

faulty **
7 Longitudinal reinforcement

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 7 of 101** Expression is

faulty **
 Longitudinal reinforcement
Position Bending moments Reinforcement
Span - Section Abscissa Face Work Theo Real Min
(mm) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) Ratio (cm²) (cm²) (cm²)
1 - Left support 0 Bottom 15.67 56.50 27.73 % 1.99 4.10 1.30
Top -13.87 -42.28 32.80 % 1.30 2.87
1 - Right support 3600 Bottom - - - 0.00 0.92 1.30
Top -49.45 -99.97 49.46 % 3.44 7.70
1 - MInf 1620 Bottom 92.44 112.29 82.32 % 6.28 7.70 1.30
Top - - - 0.00 0.00
1 - VMax 3600 Bottom - - - 0.00 0.92 1.30
Top -49.45 -99.97 49.46 % 3.44 7.70
1 - wk Max 2592 Bottom 56.38 66.83 84.36 % 4.60 4.62 1.30
Top - - - 0.00 2.70
1 - Max Concrete Stress 1620 Bottom 92.44 112.29 82.32 % 6.28 7.70 1.30
Top - - - 0.00 0.00
1 - Max Steel Stress 1620 Bottom 92.44 112.29 82.32 % 6.28 7.70 1.30
Top - - - 0.00 0.00
1 - Max Deflection 0 Bottom 15.67 56.50 27.73 % 1.99 4.10 1.30
Top -13.87 -42.28 32.80 % 1.30 2.87

Real longitudinal reinforcement

Span Position Family Reinforcement
Bottom 1 3 × ø14 + 2 × ø14 (7.70 cm²)
1
Top 1 3 × ø14 (4.62 cm²)
Bottom 1 3 × ø14 (4.62 cm²)
2
Top 1 3 × ø20 (9.42 cm²)
3 Bottom 1 3 × ø14 (4.62 cm²)

Real longitudinal reinforcement over supports

Support Family Reinforcement
1 1 3 × ø14 (4.62 cm²)
2 1 3 × ø14 + 2 × ø14 (7.70 cm²)
3 1 3 × ø20 + 3 × ø20 + 3 × ø16 (28.27 cm²)
The value of the effective height (d) is defined automatically according to the real reinforcement in place.

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 8 of 101** Expression is

faulty **
RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 9 of 101** Expression is
faulty **
RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 10 of 101** Expression
is faulty **