Executive Order 278
Executive Order 278
Executive Order 278
no. 278
PRESCRIBING GUIDELINES FOR
PROJECT LOAN NEGOTIATIONS
AND PACKAGING OF
GOVERNMENT FOREIGN-ASSISTED
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
(Practice of Architecture and
Related Consulting Services for ForeignAssisted Projects, its IRR and Guidelines)
Whereas:
the 1987 Constitution and existing
laws mandate the government to
give preference to qualified Filipinos
in the grant of rights, privileges,
and concessions covering the
national economy and patrimony
hiring
of
consultants,
which includes:
purchase of materials,
contractors,
architects,
engineers
and
other
supplies, goods, and
professionals necessary
equipment
for
a
project's
implementation
Wherea
s:
for
recent
foreignassisted infrastructure
projects bid out by
various
government
Whereas:
there is a need to prescribe guidelines in the
areas of preparation and packaging of
projects/contracts and loan negotiations for
government
foreign-assisted
infrastructure
projects which will provide Filipino constructors
and consultants with better market opportunities
and allow them to upgrade their capabilities and
compete internationally
ASEAN
INTEGRATION and
the EO no. 278
ASEAN is a close knit
community
established
between
countries in the
Indonesia, Malaysia, Phili
Southeast Asian region for
ppines, Singapore,
better mutual co-operation in
and Thailand.
social and commercial way of
life.
Brunei, Vietnam , Laos , Myanmar , and
Cambodia .
Foreign-assisted
Infrastructure
Fund is
also one possible external source of
funding
Philippine
infrastructure
requirements. This regional fund is
initially expected to provide loans of up
to US$300 million a year
Country
Indonesia
Indonesia
Viet Nam
Indonesia
Myanmar
Indonesia
Title
42362-013
Java-Bali 500-Kilovolt Power
Transmission Crossing
43251-025
Metropolitan Sanitation Mana
gement Investment Project
46391-001
Ha Noi and Ho Chi Minh City
Power Grid Development Secto
r Project
49043-001
Sustainable and Inclusive En
ergy Program (Subprogram 1)
46422-003
Greater Mekong Subregion Ea
st–West Economic Corridor E
indu to Kawkareik Road Impr
ovement Project
46443-003
Second Greater Mekong Subre
gion Corridor Towns Develop
ment Project
49080-001
Electricity Grid Strengthenin
g - Sumatra Program
Project Status
Approved
3 Dec 2013
Approved
31 Mar 2014
Approved
23 Sep 2014
Approved
30 Sep 2015
Approved
10 Nov 2015
Approved
13 Nov 2015
Approved
2 Dec 2015
Funding/ Bankability Issues: Each structure, ranging from public procurement to full PPP, has
advantages and disadvantages, but ultimately the project will need to be structured so that it works
for all stakeholders. Key considerations include:
a. Integration:
If a concession structure is chosen (rather than a fully public sector project), there could be a fully
integrated PPP structure under which a private sector concessionaire enters into a project
agreement with the relevant procuring authority and is responsible for designing, financing,
constructing, operating and maintaining the entire project. Given the scale of the project, this may
not be a viable structure. One alternative would be to separate the infrastructure concession from
rolling stock procurement and operations. Another would be to have multiple infrastructure and
maintenance concessions for different works packages. Civil works could be separated from
systems such as signaling. There are several variations to each of these structures, for example
where the public sector procures part or all of the works separately from an operations franchise.
There will be a degree of integration risk for the public sector where different infrastructure works
are procured separately.
b. Management:
A fully public sector project would require the procuring authority to retain a high level of
responsibility for managing project delivery and operations. Given the cross-border nature of the
project, this might also give rise to governance issues at the inter-governmental level. In a full PPP
structure, the public sector's management burden is minimized since the concessionaire will have
overall responsibility for delivering the project.
c. Risk transfer:
A balanced and realistic risk allocation is a crucial aspect of project
deliverability. Key risks to be allocated between the public and private sectors
include land acquisition, cost overruns, completion risk (including integration of
provide
funds in :
a. Pre-investment components
which shall include feasibility
studies and related surveys and
special studies;
c. Project
Management/Supervision
Section 3. Pre-Loan
Negotiations
Special Tax
Privileges
Para
met
ers
Intellectual
preservation of the
local talents
Exemptions,
Assumptions, Deductions
or Credits
*Reciprocity Rule
NEDA Infrastructure
Committee (INFRACOM)
SECTION 6. Repealing
Clause
All executive issuances, orders,
rules and regulations, department
orders, circulars of parts thereof
inconsistent with this Order are
hereby repealed, amended and/or
modified accordingly.
SECTION 8. Effectivity
This Order shall take effect
fifteen (15) days after its
publication in the Official
Gazette or in a newspaper of
general circulation.
DAYS