Quality Assessment of Selected: June 2020

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/342425704
QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF SELECTED
Article · June 2020
CITATIONS READS
0 321
1 author:
Adebowale Adegola
Federal University of Technology, Akure
5 PUBLICATIONS 2 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Adebowale Adegola on 24 June 2020.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Research Journal of Pure Science and Technology E-ISSN 2579-0536 P-ISSN 2695-2696,
Vol 3. No. 1 2020 www.iiardpub.org
Quality Assessment of Selected Sachet Water Brands Marketed in

Owo, Akure and Ondo Areas of Ondo State, Nigeria
Oluwaseun A. Akinsola1*, Tolulope O. Oyewumi2, Benjamin A. Adegola2 and Patience

O. Okpe3
1
Department of Chemistry, Federal University of Agriculture, Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria
2
Department of Chemistry, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria
3
department Of Microbiology, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria
Name of Corresponding Author: Oluwaseun A. Akinsola
Phone Number-+2348137973543
Email: Hakinsolar04@Gmail.Com
ABSTRACT
Sachet water in Nigeria, popularly called pure water is the most ubiquitous commercially
packaged water in the country. As a result, they are cheaper and vended in several locations
such as motor parks, markets, hospitals road sides, outskirt of schools and streets. Given the
threat of potential health risk, there is therefore need to periodically ascertain its water safety
qualities (physical, chemical and microbial) to protect public health. This study focuses on
ascertaining the quality of selected Sachet water brands in 3 major areas of Ondo State namely
Akure, Owo and Ondo metropolis. Sampling 100 retail outlets to inquire about the top 5 most
consumed sachet water brands from each area which were subjected to analysis. The results
showed that the sachet water samples had good aesthetic value as all the brands of sachet
water evaluated met the recommended WHO standard for appearance, colour, odour and
turbidity. Thirteen of the sachet water samples had pH values between 6.5 - 7.6 which met the
limit described by WHO while the other three samples had pH value below 6.5 and did not fall
within WHO drinking water standard. Other physico-chemical characteristics of all the brands
of water evaluated such as electrical conductivity, total dissolved solid, chloride, magnesium,
calcium and Nitrate were within the acceptable limits recommended by WHO for quality
drinking water except for their chemical oxygen demand properties which was >10mg/L
described by WHO. Two samples had values higher than the recommended 100mg/L for total
alkalinity. The concentration of metals; Pb, As, Cr and Mn was not detected in all the water
samples, however, Zn, Fe, Cd and Cu were found in some samples in values slightly higher
than the value described by WHO for quality water in all the 3 locations. Results of the
microbiological analyses further shows that all the brands of water had zero MPN/100mL
count for coliforms except for only three brands with values higher than the 0 MPN/100 mL
maximum limits recommended by WHO. Only two brands of the sachet water samples had
value (113CFU/mL) above the 102 CFU/mL described by WHO for aerobic mesophilic count.
This study suggests that maximum and effective treatment technique/method should be adopted
by the water manufacturing industries to reduce or totally eradicate water-borne diseases.
KEYWORDS: Sachet Water; Ondo State; Water Quality; Physical properties; Chemical
Properties; Microbiological Properties.
1. Introduction
Man’s dependence on water cannot be over-stressed, as it remains a matchless natural resource

needed for the upkeep of metabolic activity in the human body. Its use is also extended to
IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 8

agricultural production, industrial production as well as domestic use (Akoteyon et al., 2011;
Nwankwoala and Nwagbogwu, 2012; Subramani et al., 2012). However, the availability of
water for these different purposes has been a major concern throughout the world especially in
developing countries, where water resources are poorly managed. In developing countries, the
portability and availability of drinking water is a far cry from world accepted standard. For
instance, (WHO/UNICEF, 2004) reasonable access to quality water means at least 20
liters/person/day accessibility within 1 km to individual homes. This is however far from reality
as about one-sixth of human population on earth does not have access to safe drinking water
(Amoo and Akinbode, 2005). Also, report by WHO (2004), indicates about 1.1 billion
individuals do not have access to improved water supply in 2002 and about 2.3 billion people
suffer from water-borne disease.
Thus, the need for safe and accessible drinking water becomes a priority for the global world.
Most urban-rural communities in the developing countries of the Sub-Saharan Africa have
access to surface waters (rivers, streams, and lakes among others) which is the most available
sources of water used for domestic purposes. Water from these sources is often contaminated
by domestic, agricultural, and industrial activities and likely to cause water related diseases
(Ojekunle, 2000; Ayeni et al., 2009; Dimowo, 2013). Depending on the source of water and
level of unhealthy anthropogenic activities, biological contaminants such as bacteria, virus,
protozoa; chemical contaminants such as heavy metal, pesticide residue, organic matter etc.
varies in composition. Today, research reveals that polluted water kills more people than
cancer, AIDS, wars, terrorism or accidents. It is therefore pertinent that the water meant for
human consumption be free of disease-causing agents and toxic chemicals, which are capable
of posing threat to human health (Hughes and Koplan, 2005; Prasanna and Reddy, 2009).
Worsening this situation, treated drinking water in Nigeria (popularly sold in sachet and bottled
water) (Yusuf et al., 2015) are not spared from these contaminations. The production of these
water requires two important raw materials; water source (which is usually borehole) and the
packaging materials usually nylon and PET bottles. And are popularly referred to as “pure
water” and “ragolis water” respectively by the general public. This water products, although
commercially treated, packaged and distributed for sale to the public, are unsafe (Denloye,
2004). They are often sold in car parks, road sides, markets and various supermarkets and drink
stores. However, there are number of reported cases of typhoid, diarrhea and other water borne
diseases arising from consumption of sachet water (Ogamba, 2004). Water-borne diseases such
as cholera, typhoid fever and hepatitis have been reported, some of which had led to acute
health conditions and even death. The integrity of these sachet waters is therefore doubtful and
many report abounds of how most vendors do not adhere to national regulations (NAFDAC)
on sachet waters hygiene and production before sales to the public (Oladipo et al., 2009). This
has however raised the concern for public health workers, governmental agencies and
concerned individual (Oladipo et al., 2009) within the Country. Everyday more cases of water-
borne disease is also being constantly reported and treated and the more the growing concerns
about its purity (Oladipo et al., 2009).
Following the public concerns raised as a result of the poor qualities of drinking water in Ondo
state, Nigeria, in light of the increasing number of people in the urban and suburban part of the
state tending to consume more of sachet “pure water” as it was seen to be the best treated water
they can access for drinking. As a result, this research seeks to assess the drinking water quality
and characteristics of sachet water manufactured in Ondo state with case studies of Akure, Owo
and Ondo town. These will be done by assessing the physical, physicochemical, heavy metal
composition and microbiological properties of sachet water for human consumption within
Ondo state.
2. Materials and Methods

2.1 Description of Study Area(s)
Ondo state is located in southwestern part of Nigeria located within coordinate 70 10’N 50E /
7.1670 N 5.0830 E. This study was carried out on 15 different sachet water brands in three major
local governments in Ondo State. The three major area (location) studied includes; Owo, Akure
and Ondo town. Owo is located about 45 kilometers east of Akure, the Ondo State capital and
lies on latitude 7°15’ North of the Equator and longitude 5°35’ East of Greenwich Meridian. It
is placed about 348 metres above sea level and has a population of 276,574 people (2006
census). Akure lies on latitude 7015’ North of the Equator and on longitude 5011’ East of the
Greenwich meridian. Akure is the capital of Ondo state (largest city) with a population of about
484,798 people according to National Population Census of 2006 and it stands at the altitude
of about 353 meters above the sea level. Ondo Town is the third most populated local
government in Ondo State and is located southwest from Akure about 47.8Km away and lies
in latitude 7015’ North of the equator and longitude 4050’ East of the Greenwich meridian. It is
situated 263metres above sea level with a population of 358,430 people (2006 census).
Figure 1: Map of Ondo state Showing Study Areas 1(Owo), 2 (Akure) and 3 (Ondo)

Source: Ondo State Ministry of Housing and Urban Development, Akure (2015)
2.2 Sample Collection
A total of 15 sachet water brands were sampled with 5 from each of the three locations (Owo,
Akure, Ondo). Each of the brands was selected based on a survey of 100 randomly selected
retailers from each study area. From this survey, the first five (5) most patronized sachet water
products were selected for study from each area. The samples were analyzed for their physical,
chemical (including heavy metals) and microbiological properties. Samples for metal analysis
were preserved with few drops of HNO3 likewise samples for microbiological analysis were
collected in a sterile autoclave bottle (temperature between 0-100C).
Table 1: Sample Code and Name
Akure Owo Ondo
Sample Code Brand Name Sample Code Brand Name Sample Code Brand Name
A1 Glazzy Water B1 Oyin water C1 Hotis water

A2 Omitab Water B2 Rugipo water C2 B.mor water
A3 Fearon Water B3 Ibiloye water C3 Fade-olu water
A4 DPC Water B4 Prayer water C4 First value water
A5 Amuye Water B5 Adreeb water C5 Datisam water
2.3 Physical and Chemical Analysis of Samples

The physicochemical examination of the water samples were completed within six hours of
sample collection. The pH of each water sample was determined immediately after receiving
the sample at the laboratory using a calibrated handheld pH meter (Techmel and Techmel
USA). The colour and turbidity of each sample was measured with a digital spectrophotometer.
A calibrated conductivity meter was employed for the determination of the Conductivity of the
water samples. Other chemical analyses of the samples such as TDS, Total Alkalinity, Total
Hardness, Chloride, COD, Calcium, Magnesium, and Nitrate were done using methods
specified in APHA (2005).
2.4 Digestion of Sample and Heavy Metal Analysis
All glass apparatus used were rinsed with dilute acid (10% HCl) and washed many times with
distilled-deionized water to ensure no metal contaminants were introduced. 100ml of water
sample was measured into a clean 250mL conical flask and 10mL of the concentrated nitric
acid was added. The mixture was boiled slowly and then evaporated to the lowest possible
volume (about 25mL) on a hot plate placed in the fume cupboard. The remaining volume of
solution after heating was filtered into a 100 mL standard flask and made up to the mark with
distilled water. The concentrations (in mg/L) of eights metals Zn, Pb, Fe, Cd, Cr, Mn, As and
Cu were determined in the samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry, AAS (Buck
Scientific Model 210VGP).
2.5 Microbiological Analysis
The total coliform was estimated according to the method described by Chatterjee et al., (2007)
using the 5-tube most probable number method. Other microbiological properties were
conducted by multiple tube fermentation tests described in APHA (2005) and Manish and
Abhishek, (2016).

3. Results And Discussion

3.1 Physical Properties
The quality of water is first judged by it physical properties, which further determines its
acceptability by consumers for direct consumption (Adekunle, et al., 2007). Physical or
Organoleptic properties like appearance, colour, odour and turbidity are often used in water
purification plants to give a firsthand examination of its aesthetic and approximated degree of
contamination. From literature, water safe for drinking is expected to be clear, colourless and
odourless. These physical parameters are however subjective and dependent on appropriate
human sense organ (FSSAI, 2015). Table 2 gives a detailed description of the physical
(organoleptic) properties of the sachet water brands. However, alteration to this parameter
signifies contamination by external matters present in it. The results of physical properties for
all the sachet water samples evaluated met the recommended WHO standards for quality
drinking water for appearance, colour, odour and turbidity. This showed that the water sample
has good aesthetic value.
Table 2: Result of Physical Properties
Appearance Colour Odour Turbidity

(TCU) (NTU)
WHO CLR CLS ODL 5

A1 CLR CLS ODL ND
A2 CLR CLS ODL ND
A3 CLR CLS ODL ND
A4 CLR CLS ODL ND
A5 CLR CLS ODL ND
B1 CLR CLS ODL ND
B2 CLR CLS ODL ND
B3 CLR CLS ODL ND
B4 CLR CLS ODL ND
B5 CLR CLS ODL ND
C1 CLR CLS ODL ND
C2 CLR CLS ODL ND
C3 CLR CLS ODL ND
C4 CLR CLS ODL ND
C5 CLR CLS ODL ND
† Key: A1 – C5 (Different Samples); CLS (Colourless); CLR (Clear); ODL (Odourless): ND
(Not Detected): TCU (True Colour Unit): NTU (Nephelometric Turbidity Units); WHO 2006
3.2 Physico-Chemical Properties

The pH for sample water can change depending amount dissolved gases such as carbon dioxide,
hydrogen sulphide and ammonia, as well as inorganic matter dissolved in it. Pure water should
have a pH of 7.0. However, this is far from reality due to impurities and ability of water to
dissolve matter and organic salt around it. Natural water can be either slightly acidic or slightly

alkaline (Alexander et al., 2019). From the result in Table 3, all the samples analyzed has values
within the recommended limit (6.5-8.5) described by the WHO standard for quality drinking
water except for samples A5 (6.40), C3 (6.20) and C5 (6.20) which has pH values slightly
below the recommended limit and there is a slight significant difference in the means of the
samples between and within study areas i.e. p>0.05. More generally, the pH values reported
for Owo, Akure and Ondo lies between 6.60 – 7.60, 6.40 – 7.60 and 6.20 – 7.00 respectively.
This implies that the underground soil in the study areas specifically Ondo is slightly acidic
and as such the packaging and/or the treatment process may alter the water pH slightly. Their
acidic nature may be due to poor sanitation and domestic effluent discharge that percolates into
the ground of the area. They are also likely to be associated with the erosion of loamy and
clayey soils from cultivated fields that increase the concentration of ions.
Conductivity is a faster and reliable method of controlling and monitoring water treatment. It
gives the idea about ionisable materials in water (Alexander et al., 2019). It affects all aspects
of water treatment and suitability of specific application (Ogundipe, 2015). The result in Table
3 reveals that all the analyzed sachet water brands possesses EC values ranging from
60.8µmho/cm to 353.0µmho/cm which is within the acceptable limit of 1000µmho/cm
described in the manual for quality drinking water by WHO. There is a huge significant
difference in the means of the samples between and within study areas i.e. p>0.05. However,
literature has it that long term consumption of treated sample water with EC > 40µmho/cm can
lead to high probability of fracture in children, pregnancy disorder, diuresis and increased tooth
decay (Guler 2007).
Total Dissolved Solid (TDS) is a measure of the total amount of dissolved substances in the
water sample. According to Olusiji and Adeyinka, (2011), high levels of TDS can lead to
gastro-intestinal irritation and stains to fabric. Drinking water containing TDS levels above
500mg/L usually has a disagreeably strong taste (Apau et al., 2014) and generally indicates
hard water, which can cause scale buildup in pipes, valves and filters (Nsiah and Boakye,
2015). As seen in Table 3, the TDS (Total Dissolved Solid) obtained for the analyzed samples
ranges from (42.0 – 247.0 mg/L) which are within the WHO reference standards. However,
there is a huge significant difference between and within the means of samples in the study
areas i.e. p>0.05.
Alkalinity is a measure of the acid-neutralizing capacity of water. In most natural waters, it is
due to the presence of carbonate (CO3-), bicarbonate (HCO3-), and hydroxyl (OH-) anions.
However, borates, phosphates, silicates, and other bases also contribute to alkalinity if present
(Wilson, 2010). The result obtained for all the sample are within the WHO acceptable limit
except for sample A3 and B5 with values (128.8 mg/L) and (114.5 mg/L) respectively which
are slightly above the recommended limit (100 mg/L). The high TA values observed in B5 may
be due to deposits or contamination during treatment. However, the values observed in samples
from Akure are between 86.5 – 128.8 mg/L which may be due to the basic nature of the soil in
the area. There is no significant difference in the means of the samples between and within the
study areas i.e. p<0.05.
Total hardness which measure the concentration of multivalent metallic cations (majorly Ca2+,
Mg2+) in water; can serve as source of dietary Calcium and Magnesium to the body (Alexander
et al., 2019). As indicated in Table 3. Sample A3 has the highest TH value (122 mg/L) which
is above the recommended limit prescribed by WHO and correlates well with the high value
(247mg/L) observed in TDS of the sample which is could cause clogging in pipes and rusting
for plants. However, all other samples have values which are within the 100mg/L
recommended by WHO. There is no significant difference in the means of the samples between
and within the study areas i.e. p<0.05.
Chlorides are found naturally in the environment, but elevated levels of chloride can also be
associated with septic system effluent, storm water runoff, brine water, cleaning solutions, and
other industrial solutions (Mandal et al ,2011; WHO, 2006). Increase in chloride concentration
in conventional water treatment plant is due to the amount of free chloride after chlorination.
The result shown in Table 3 depicts that the values (14 – 56 mg/L) obtained in all the samples
met the requirement of 100mg/L described by WHO for chloride concentration in drinking
water. However, Nitrate was not detected in all the sample except for B3, B4, C1 and C3 whose
values are also within the 50 mg/L described by WHO for Nitrate concentration in drinking
water. The presence of nitrates in a water sample could be due to inorganic fertilizers, plants
and animal decomposition and wastes which may have percolated the soils over time
(Ademoroti, 1996). The low values of nitrate and chloride as shown in Table 3 could be due to
the fact that soluble particles that are chemical in nature could be well distributed in the body
of the water and possibly interact with the water molecules in a form that storage for one week
may not have significantly affected the concentration in the body of water. However, no
significant difference was observed in the means of the samples between and within the study
areas i.e. p<0.05.
The values obtained for magnesium for all the samples analyzed ranged from 3.2 mg/L to 12.8
mg/L which are within the limit (30mg/L) described by WHO for quality drinking water. A
slight significant difference was observed in the means of the samples between and within the
study areas i.e. p<0.05. However, high concentrations of Mg can cause consumer
unacceptability when used in productions.
The Chemical Oxygen demand for all the sachet water brands studied in all the three areas are
observed to be above WHO standard of 10mg/L except for some few cases of A1, A4, A5, C3
and C4 in which COD was not detected. As a result of high value of COD, samples from the 3
studied areas might have a lower shelf life as there are more chemicals in sample competing
for oxygen (Oko et al., 2015).

Table 3: Result of Physico-Chemical Analysis
pH EC TDS TA TH Chloride Calcium Magnesium Nitrate COD

(µmho/cm) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L)
WHO 6.5-8.5 1.0×103 500 100 100 100 75 30 50 10

A1 6.80 143.1 100.1 90.9 84.6 46 20.8 12.8 ND ND
A2 7.40 136.5 95.4 98.2 66.1 45 21.6 4.8 ND 48
A3 7.60 353.0 247.0 128.8 122.0 56 30.4 18.4 ND 64
A4 7.20 152.3 106.8 86.5 82.0 34 29.6 3.2 ND ND
A5 6.40 143.9 89.4 90.6 78.0 32 20.8 12.8 ND ND
B1 6.80 107.4 75.2 28.8 30.4 34 7.2 4.8 ND 42
B2 6.80 167.4 117.2 86.3 68.2 31 16.8 10.4 ND 64
B3 6.60 170.6 119.3 44.8 58.7 30 14.4 8.8 0.12 32
B4 7.60 123.8 86.4 66.4 40.9 31 8.8 7.2 0.08 64
B5 7.60 169.1 118.3 114.5 40.0 14 12.8 3.2 ND 64
C1 7.00 173.0 121.6 82.1 52.2 32 11.2 9.68 0.05 96
C2 7.00 119.3 83.3 52.3 34.1 32 11.2 2.48 ND 160
C3 6.20 286.5 200.2 66.4 86.4 43 24.8 9.64 0.12 ND
C4 6.80 89.5 62.1 36.9 30.7 29 7.2 4.87 ND ND
C5 6.20 60.8 42.0 26.0 26.3 28 ND 10.41 ND 128
† Key: A1 – C5 (Different Samples); ND (Not Detected); EC (Electrical Conductivity); TDS (Total Dissolved Solids); TA (Total Alkalinity); TH (Total
Hardness); COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand); WHO 2006.


3.3 Heavy Metal Properties
For this study, four (4) essential micronutrient nutrients (Mn, Fe, Cu and Zn) with significant
nutritional value (Alexander et al., 2019) was studied alongside four (4) toxic heavy metals (As,
Cr, Pb and Cd). Large dose of these metals is known to have adverse contribute to the taste of
water and further lead to acute or chronic health condition (Ibrahim et al., 2015).
As shown in Table 4, metals such as manganese, chromium, arsenic and lead were not detected
in all the sachet water brands across all the three areas of study, which further indicate that the
water samples in those areas are free from heavy metal contamination capable of causing chronic
health challenges. Significantly the Cadmium concentration (0.036 – 0.199 mg/L) for all water
brands in Akure is alarming exceeding the 0.003 mg/L allowance limit described WHO for quality
drinking water and as a result, consumers in Akure are exposed to chronic health risk from
cadmium toxicity. However, cadmium was not detected in water brands from Ondo and Owo
except for B5 (0.111 mg/L) which could pose danger to consumers as a result of health risk due
to cadmium toxicity.
Other common metals like Iron, Zinc and Copper are found and can serve as dietary supplement
given that they are significantly present in nutritionally significant concentration in packaging
plant. Iron is found at lower concentration ranging from 0.01 mg/L to 0.04 mg/L less than the
recommended 0.3mg/L described by WHO for samples A1, A5, B1, B2, and C1 but not detectable
in other samples. This implies that there is no significant health risk in the samples in comparison
to permissible standard used. The concentrations detected for Cu and Zn in some of the samples
from the three study areas shown in Table 4 are less than 1 mg/L and 3 mg/L for copper and zinc
respectively, as prescribed by WHO for quality drinking water. This implies that the samples are
acceptable as they pose no risk to human health. However, water containing zinc at concentrations
in excess of 3–5 mg/L may appear opalescent and develop a greasy film on boiling. Although
drinking-water seldom contains zinc at concentrations above 0.1 mg/L, levels in tap water can be
considerably higher because of the zinc used in older galvanized plumbing materials (Gordon et
al., 1996).
High concentrations of Iron, Zinc, and Copper can affect the acceptability of drinking water, and
should be given adequate priority during processing (WHO, 2006). Ibrahim et al., (2015) and
Alexander et al., (2019) reported that large doses of the aforementioned metals causes diseases
such as kidney damage, liver cirrhosis, lethargy, gastrointestinal disorder, headache,
sleeplessness, and leg weakness.

Table 4: Result of Heavy Metal Analysis
Mn (mg/L) Fe (mg/L) Cr (mg/L) Zn (mg/L) Cu (mg/L) As (mg/L) Pb (mg/L) Cd (mg/L)
WHO 0.5 0.3 0.05 3 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.003

A1 ND 0.01 ND ND ND ND ND 0.199
A2 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.036
A3 ND ND ND ND 0.332 ND ND 0.052
A4 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.128
A5 ND 0.01 ND ND ND ND ND 0.100
B1 ND 0.04 ND 0.13 0.015 ND ND ND
B2 ND 0.01 ND 0.218 ND ND ND ND
B3 ND ND ND 0.157 0.011 ND ND ND
B4 ND ND ND 0.023 0.284 ND ND ND
B5 ND ND ND 0.146 0.310 ND ND 0.111
C1 ND 0.01 ND ND 0.424 ND ND ND
C2 ND ND ND 0.182 0.086 ND ND ND
C3 ND ND ND 0.240 0.005 ND ND ND
C4 ND ND ND 0.396 ND ND ND ND
C5 ND ND ND 0.240 ND ND ND ND
† Key: A1 – C5 (Different Samples); ND (Not Detected); WHO 2006.


3.4 Microbiological Properties

Far more dangerous is the presence of disease causing pathogens in water. High microbial load is
attributed to poor sanitation in the water treatment process or ineffectiveness in the water
treatment process. Consequently, WHO recommends 0 cfu/100 ml for treated water. To further
assess the safety of marketed product within the three study areas and on the sachet water brands.
The presence of coliform indicates the risk of water-borne diseases (Alexander et al., 2019) is
used. As shown in Table 5, B3 (8 MPN/100mL), C2 (6 MPN/100mL), and C4 (15 MPN/100mL)
has a high most probable number and violates the 0 MNP/100mL described by WHO thus making
it unfit for consumption. Hence potential risk is associated with the consumption of such treated
water. Moreover, no coliform was detected in samples from Akure and some samples in Owo and
Ondo. This speaks quality of the safety of this sold water product as they are exactly to the zero
specification laid down by WHO. As coliform test is not a confirmed quality indicator, it is
advised that company B3, C2 and C4 take decisive precaution in the treatment process to prevent
further contamination of finished product and improve better in her treatment technique.
The aerobic mesophilic count is a generic term to monitor the safety, sanitary quality and
organoleptic acceptability of water intended for direct consumption. Although not a quality
indicator it is performed on raw water samples and treated samples to measure the count of
bacterial which can aerobically survive at 250C-400C. In Table 5, the value recorded for all the
sachet water brands analyzed from Akure and some of Ondo and Owo are within the standard
limit of 102cfu described by WHO for quality drinking water. Only B3 and C2 samples had values
(113cfu) slightly above the standard limit which make sachet water brand unsafe for consumption
according to WHO, (2006) and would require constant sanitary inspection of the water source to
prevent pathogenic infestation.
H2S paper strip test indicates the presents of microbes of the coliform origin capable of causing
cholera and typhoid fever (Alexander et al., 2019). The water safety indication of this test is shown
in Table 5. All water brand samples in Akure showed no risk (NR) of pathogenic contamination
(feacal coliform), and therefore consumers of product from the 5 brands in Akure are safe while
the water sample for some particular brands like C2 and B3 had low risk (LR) and C4 had
moderate risk (MR) as shown in the result. Sachet water brands with low and moderate risks raises
a deep concern which can be potentially harmful to consumers as WHO standard stipulates no
risk (NR). This can however, be treated by chlorination. Adequate waste management is a key
factor in preservation of water quality. Awajiogak, (2013) reported that poor and improper waste
management systems have constituted a menace to ground water.
From the results, it can be inferred that there is high efficiency in the treatment (disinfection)
process by the packaging plants in Akure i.e. the treatment process for the removal of the
pathogenic contamination. The existence of coliforms and bacteria in water samples after being
treated may result from the absence of sophisticated treatment equipment such as UV disinfectant
or reverse osmosis or inefficient or weak water treatment equipment. Hence, serious action should
be taken to eliminate pathogenic contamination and make the products fit for consumption.
Table 5: Result of Microbial Analysis
Coliforms, Aerobic Mesophilic Count H2S Paper Strip

MPN/100mL (×100)
WHO 0 102 --NR

A1 0 17 --NR
A2 0 21 --NR

A3 0 60 --NR
A4 0 14 --NR
A5 0 9 --NR
B1 0 11 --NR
B2 0 7 --NR
B3 8 113 +LR
B4 0 11 --NR
B5 0 11 --NR
C1 0 14 --NR
C2 6 113 +LR
C3 0 11 --NR
C4 15 15 ++MR
C5 0 0 --NR
† Key: A1 – C5 (Different Samples); MR = Moderate Risk; NR= No Risk; LR= Low Risk;
WHO 2006.
4. Conclusion and Recommendation

From this study it was discovered that the major contaminant of sachet water brands marketed in
Akure, Owo and Ondo metropolis of Ondo State, Nigeria is due to the inconsistency in the
treatment process and the level of contamination of the source water used for production. Thus
measurement parameters can estimate potential serious health challenges of diarrhea, typhoid, etc.
prevalent in the study areas. High values of EC (353 µmho/cm) and TDS (247 mg/L) in sample
A3 confirm the presence of salts. Ca has the highest concentrations (30.4 mg/L) among the salts
which resulted in high total hardness (122 mg/L) and total alkalinity (128.8 mg/L) values in the
samples (A3). It is important also to note that A3 violated the WHO limits the most among the
sachet water brands in the areas under study in term of their chemical property while all the brands
in Akure were below the limit recommended by WHO. Water brand A1 and A4 are adjudged the
best brand with respect to the parameters monitored and having met up with the standard limits
described by WHO for all the parameters. But with respect to microbiological contaminants, B3
and C2 are the worst polluted and C5 is the least. The analysis reveals that sachet water brands
should adequately be improved in the treatment processes. Consequently it should not be assumed
that “pure or sachet water” is pure. However, more has to be done to ensure sachet water (pure
water) are free from pathogen capable of causing outbreak of cholera, dysentery, diarrhea and
other water borne diseases as study shows a significant level of microbial contamination in B3,
C2 and C4. It is recommended that questions should be raised by the regulating authorities in
Nigeria such as NAFDAC, SON and NIS about promising strategies that will improve it, so as
not to push the community to regress to poorer sources which could lead to more severe
conditions.
Acknowledgement
The authors are most grateful to Almighty God for His blessings, mercies, protection and
unmerited favour throughout this research work.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest

REFERENCES
Adekunle E.I. Adetunji M.T, Gbadebo A.M and Banjoko O.B (2007). “Assessment of ground
water quality in a typical rural settlement in southeast Nigeria. J. Environ Research Public
Health. 4. 307.318.
Ademoroti, C.M.A. (1996). Standard Methods for Water Effluents Analysis (1st ed). Foludex
press limited, Ibadan. Pg. 21-43.
Adeodu, A. O., Daniyan I. A. and Yusuff A. S. (2013). Assessment of Soil, Water and Plant
Pollution by Heavy Metals from Petroleum and Petrochemical Companies in Nigeria. Int.
Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research. 4(7) 2401- 2412.
Akoteyon, S.L., Omotayo, A.O., Soladoye, O. and Olaoye, H.O. (2011). Determination of Water
Quality Index and Suitability of Urban River for Municipal Water Supply in Lagos
Nigeria. European Journal of Scientific Research, 54(2): 263-271.
Akpen G. D., Kpoghol I. S. and Oparaku L. A. (2018) Quality Assessment of Sachet and bottled
water sold in Gboko, Benue state, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Technology 37(1), 241 –
248
Alexander P, Bwatanglang I. B. and Daniel J. (2019), Assessment of Physicochemical and
Bacteriological Parameters of Borehole and Hand Dug Well Water in Michika and
Environs, Adamawa State, Nigeria, Microbiology Research Journal International, 28(6):
1-11, 2019
Amoo, I.A and Akinbode, U.E. (2005). Comparison of Water Quality in Concrete Ringed Water
Wells and Unringed Water Wells in Akure, Nigeria. Unpublished Federal University M.sc.
Thesis. pp 13-17.
Apau, J., Acheampong, A. and Bepule, V. (2014). Physicochemical and Microbial Parameters of
Water from Hand-Dug Wells from Nyamebekyere, a Suburb of Obuasi, Ghana.
International Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 3(6), pp. 1 - 5.
APHA (2005). “Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water”. 21st Edition,
Washington D.C.
Awajiogak, A.U. (2013). Evaluating Groundwater Contamination Processes and Developing
Framework for Qualitative Management in parts of Nigeria. International Journal of
Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology 2(8): 3890 – 3900.
Ayeni A. O., Soneye A. S. O., and Balogun I. I., (2009). The Arab World Geographer, (no
publisher) 12(1-2): 95-104.
Chatterjee S.N., Das D., Roy M., Banerjee S., Dey P., Bhattacharya T. and Chandra G. (2007).
Bacteriological examination of drinking water in Burdwin, India with reference to
coliforms. African journal of Biotechnology 6(22): 2601 – 2602.
Denloye, S.A. (2004). Quality Parameters for Packaged Water NAFDAC Laboratory Experience.
IPAN News (4):46-50.
Dimowo B.O. (2013). Assessment of Some Physico-Chemical Parameters of River Ogun
(Abeokuta, Ogun State, Southwestern Nigeria) in Comparison with National and
International Standards. International Journal of Aquaculture: 3(15): 79-84.
FSSAI (2015). Manual of Methods of Analysis of Foods (Water). Ministry of Health and Family
Welfare Government of India. New Delhi:
Gordon, D.C. Jr., Boudreau, P.R., Mann, K.H., Ong, J.-E., Silvert, W.L., Smith, S.V.,
Wattayakorn, G., Wulff, F., Yanagi, T., (1996). LOICZ “Biogeochemical Modelling
Guideline”, LOICZ Reports & Studies No. 5. Second Edition, LOICZ, Texel, The
Netherlands, pp.99.
Guler, C., (2007) Evaluation of maximum contaminant levels in Turkish bottled drinking waters

utilizing parameters reported on manufacturer’s labeling and government-issued

production licenses. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 20: 262–272.
Hughes J.M, Koplan J.P. (2005). Saving Lives through Global Safe Water. Journal of Emerging
Infectious. Diseases; 11 (10): 1636-1637.
Ibrahim M.D, Umaru M., Akinsoji A. A, (2015) Qualitative Assessment of Sachet and Bottled
Water Marketed in Bauchi Metropolis, Nigeria, Chemical and Process Engineering
Research, Vol.37
Mandal, H.S., Das, A and Nanda, A.K (2012). Study of some physicochemical water quality
parameters of Karola River,west Bengal-An attempt to estimate pollution status.
International Journal of Environmental protection. 2(8)16-22.
Manish N and Abhishek D. (2016). Modified H2S Paper Strip Test for Detection of
Bacteriological Contamination in Drinking Water. International Journal of Engineering
Development and Research. Volume 4(2): 632 – 636.
Ndinwa L.L, Oveh B, Okoriye, T, Vaikosen, N.A (2008). Assessment of drinking water quality
and prevalence of water-borne diseases in Amassoma, Niger Delta, African Journal of
Biotechnology 7:2993-2997
Nsiah, J.J. and Boakye, E. (2015). Assessment of the Quality of Water from Hand-Dug Wells in
Shama Ahanta West Metropolitan Assembly: Western Region of Ghana. International
Journal of Science and Technology, Volume 5 (9), pp. 1 -7.
Nwankwoala, H.O. and Nwagbogwu, C.N. (2012). Characteristics and quality assessment of
groundwater in parts of Akure, South-Western Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Science
and Water Resources, 1(4): 67 - 73.
Ogamba, A.S. (2004). Packed Drinking Water, How Safe? Professionalism, IPAN news (4):70
76.
Ogundipe, O.A (2015). Evaluation of physicochemical and microbial properties of some sachet
and bottled water sold in Akure, Ondo State. A final year project submitted to the
department of chemistry, Federal University of Technology, Akure. Pp 1 – 15.
Ojekunle I. A., (2000). Transport and Urban Environmental Quality in Nigeria in Contemporary
to AD 2000, Frankad Publishers, Lagos.
Ojo J.S., Olorunfemi M.O., Aduwo I. A., Bayode S., Akintorinwa, O. J., Omosuyi, G.O and
Akinluyi F.O (2014), Assessment of Surface and Groundwater Quality of the Akure
Metropolis, Southwestern Nigeria. Journal of Environment and Earth Science 4, (23)
Ojo, O.M., (2015). Quality Assessment of Selected Sachet Water Brands in Akure Metropolis,
South Western Nigeria. European International Journal of Science and Technology 4 (2)
Oko O.J, Aremu M. O., Odoh R, Yebpella G and Shenge G.A, (2015) Assessment of Water
Quality Index of Borehole and Well Water in Wukari Town, Taraba State, Nigeria.
Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 4 (5)
Okonko I.O, Ogunjobi A.A, Adejoye O.D, Ogunnusi T.A, Olasogba M.C. (2008b). Comparative
studies and Microbial risk assessment of different water samples used for processing
frozen sea-foods in Ijora-Olopa, Lagos State, Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology;
7(16):2902-2907
Oladipo I.C, Onyenike I.C, Adebiyi A.O (2009). Microbiological analysis of some vended sachet
water in Ogbomoso, Nigeria. African Journal of Food Science; 3(12): 406-412.
Olusiji, S.A. and Adeyinka, O.A. (2011). Portability Status of Some Hand-dug Wells in Ekiti
State, Southwestern Nigeria. Int. Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 1(2), pp.1-8.
Prasanna R.B and Reddy M.S. (2009). Bacteriological examination of drinking water with
reference to coliforms in Jeedimetla, Hyderabad, India. African Journal of Biotechnology;
8 (20): 5506-5507.
Subramani, T. Krishnan, S. and Kumaresan, P.K. (2012). Study of Groundwater Quality with GIS

Application for Coonoor Taluk in Nilgiri District. International Journal of Modern U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, 1986, Quality Criteria for Water
(Gold Book), EPA 440/5-86-001, Washington D.C.
WHO (World Health Organisation). 2004a. Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality. 3rd Edition.
World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
WHO and UNICEF (2004.) Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation;
Meeting the MDG Drinking Water and Sanitation Target: A Mid-Term Assessment of
Progress, W.H.O Geneva
WHO, (2006). Technical Interventions. In WHO, Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality 2nd
Edition- Volume 3 - Surveillance and control of community supplies (pp. 84 - 128).
Geneva: World Health Organization ISBN 92 4 154503 8.
WHO/UNICEF (2005). Water for life: making it happen. Joint Monitoring Programme Report.
Wilson C. P., (2010). Water quality notes: Alkalinity and Hardness; University of Florida IFAS
Extension: Publication No. SL 332
(www.edis.ifas.ufl.edu/topic_series_water_quality_notes) Retrieved 4th July, 2019.
Yusuf, Y.O., Jimoh, A.I., Onaolapo, E.O. and Dabo, Y. (2015) An assessment of sachet water
quality in Zaria Area of Kaduna State, Nigeria, Journal of Geography and Regional
Planning, 8(7):174-180
View publication stats

Quality Assessment of Selected: June 2020

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Quality Assessment of Selected: June 2020

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Quality Assessment of Selected: June 2020

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF SELECTED

Article · June 2020

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Quality Assessment of Selected Sachet Water Brands Marketed in

Oluwaseun A. Akinsola1*, Tolulope O. Oyewumi2, Benjamin A. Adegola2 and Patience

Man’s dependence on water cannot be over-stressed, as it remains a matchless natural resource

IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 8

2. Materials and Methods

IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 10

Table 1: Sample Code and Name

Akure Owo Ondo

A1 Glazzy Water B1 Oyin water C1 Hotis water

2.3 Physical and Chemical Analysis of Samples

IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 11

3. Results And Discussion

Table 2: Result of Physical Properties

Appearance Colour Odour Turbidity

WHO CLR CLS ODL 5

3.2 Physico-Chemical Properties

IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 12

IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 14

Table 3: Result of Physico-Chemical Analysis

pH EC TDS TA TH Chloride Calcium Magnesium Nitrate COD

WHO 6.5-8.5 1.0×103 500 100 100 100 75 30 50 10

IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 15

IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 16

3.3 Heavy Metal Properties

IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 17

Table 4: Result of Heavy Metal Analysis

Mn (mg/L) Fe (mg/L) Cr (mg/L) Zn (mg/L) Cu (mg/L) As (mg/L) Pb (mg/L) Cd (mg/L)

WHO 0.5 0.3 0.05 3 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.003

IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 18

IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 19

3.4 Microbiological Properties

Table 5: Result of Microbial Analysis

Coliforms, Aerobic Mesophilic Count H2S Paper Strip

WHO 0 102 --NR

IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 20

4. Conclusion and Recommendation

IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 21

IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 22

utilizing parameters reported on manufacturer’s labeling and government-issued

IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 23

IIARD – International Institute of Academic Research and Development Page 24

View publication stats

You might also like