The document summarizes corrections made by reviewers to a manuscript. The corrections address language issues, clarifications, and adding references. Suggested changes are made to sentence structures and wording throughout the manuscript sections including abstract, introduction and conclusions.
The document summarizes corrections made by reviewers to a manuscript. The corrections address language issues, clarifications, and adding references. Suggested changes are made to sentence structures and wording throughout the manuscript sections including abstract, introduction and conclusions.
The document summarizes corrections made by reviewers to a manuscript. The corrections address language issues, clarifications, and adding references. Suggested changes are made to sentence structures and wording throughout the manuscript sections including abstract, introduction and conclusions.
The document summarizes corrections made by reviewers to a manuscript. The corrections address language issues, clarifications, and adding references. Suggested changes are made to sentence structures and wording throughout the manuscript sections including abstract, introduction and conclusions.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 9
CORRECTION TABLE ACCORDING TO REVIEWERS COMMENTS
REVIEWER COMMENTS CORRECTION
Reviewer 1 1. Language. The English of the manuscript was revised and checked. The language is a bit weak. You need to get the manuscript checked from an English speaking native or get help from services. 2. Section Abstract (Line 2) Section Abstract (Line 2) Language error. The sentence was changed to: Amongst these polymorphs, “brookite films “Amongst these polymorphs, brookite are less reported and often” less reported and mostly produced as mostly produced as a by-product.” a by-product. 3. Section Abstract (Line 3) Section Abstract (Line 3) Language error. The sentence was changed to: In this work, two deposition methods which “In this work, two deposition methods which are dip and spin are dip and spin coating are selected “to coating are selected to compare the effect of deposition compare on the effect” of deposition methods on TiO2 crystalline phase formation, particularly on methods towards phase formation. identifying the brookite presence.” 4. Section Introduction (Paragraph 3, Line 7) Section Introduction (Paragraph 3, Line 7) Check language. The sentence was changed to: For instance, during a dip coating, the glass “For instance, during a dip coating, the glass substrate is substrate is normally withdrawn vertically normally withdrawn vertically from the sol at a constant from the sol at a “continues” speed. speed.” 5. Section Introduction (Paragraph 4, Line Section Introduction (Paragraph 4, Line 19) 19) This statement is to highlight an argument that a single “In another method, Mothi et al. managed to phase brookite film is able to be produced via spin coating synthesize brookite particle with crystallite method as reported by Arier and Tepehan [22]. size of 11 nm via spin coating using TTIP as This is because in Arier and Tepehan work, brookite is a precursor and ethylene glycol as a produced as single phase. In contrast, Mothi et al. produced complexing agent [22].” brookite in a mixture phase. The argument was revised to: “For instance, Arier and Tepehan managed to synthesize brookite thin film (with crystallite size of ~12 nm) on Corning 2947 glass substrate using titanium butoxide as a precursor and ethanol as a solvent [37].” 6. Section Introduction (Paragraph 4) Section Introduction (Paragraph 4) The question is that why in this work brookite The paragraph 4 was revised in order to highlight the is not formed via sol-gel. Please discuss this brookite formed via sol-gel dip and spin coating. in the results and discussion section. The paragraph was revised as follow: “In reviewing related works on TiO2 deposition, few reported work are discussing on the effect of deposition method on the produced TiO2 phases. Many works are just simply mentioning the deposition method and phases produced without focusing on explaining the effect of the deposition method on the results obtained. In focus to brookite formation, several deposition methods such as dip coating and spin coating had produce this crystalline phase as a minor product or mixture phases. For example, using the dip coating method, the produced TiO2 film deposited on the glass substrate contained brookite as a by-product to anatase [33]. While, TiO2 films with the 70% weight fraction of brookite with the remaining fractions were anatase and amorphous TiO2 produce by Djoued et. al. [34]. Djoued et al. claimed that the amount of polyethylene glycol (PEG) in the sol formulation influenced the nucleation of the brookite and anatase phases. In addition, Ohara and his co-workers observed an overlapping of crystalline peaks of brookite (120) and anatase (101) in TiO 2 film deposited on soda lime glass [35]. He suggests that the Na ion from the substrate diffused to the film surface and promotes the brookite phase. Despite less report on a single brookite formation, Novotna et al. had observed formation of single brookite film on soda lime glass substrate with crystallite size of 50 ± 10 nm [36]. He claimed that the diffusion Na+ lead to the formation of brookite. While, using the spin coating method, more work had been able to synthesize single brookite film. For instance, Arier and Tepehan managed to synthesize brookite thin film (with crystallite size of ~12 nm) on Corning 2947 glass substrate using titanium butoxide as a precursor and ethanol as a solvent [37]. Besides, Komaraiah et al. had reported producing brookite film on glass substrate with crystallite sizes of 54 - 67 nm [16]. Singh et al. had also produced brookite film with crystallite size of 28 – 48 nm via spin coating using ethyl alcohol as a solvent [38]. While, Katsumata et al. reported brookite formation in film deposited on polyimide substrate. Here, the brookite formation is due to the concentration of Na ion from sodium oleate during hydrothermal treatment [39].” 7. Section Introduction (Paragraph 5, Line 7) Section Introduction (Paragraph 5, Line 7) “A more systematic study on the deposition The reference number was added. method was made by Wang et al. to “Besides, Wang et al. had carried out study on different understand the effect of deposition method deposition method to understand its effect on the TiO 2 thin on the TiO2 thin film phase formation, grain film phase formation, grain size, morphology and thickness size, morphology and thickness towards towards greater photocatalytic performance [29].” greater photocatalytic performance”. Put reference in this sentence too. 8. Section Introduction (Paragraph 2, Line Section Introduction (Paragraph 2, Line 28) 28) The sentences was added and revised in order to highlight Does green sol-gel route produces brookite? the green sol-gel route (without the use of any solvent). If yes, mention the reference. The senteces was revised as follow: “Yet, there are no published report on the brookite formation without the use of solvent. Therefore, this work is pioneering an effort on TiO2 deposition for brookite formation via a green sol-gel route.” 9. Section Introduction (Paragraph 1, Line 6) Section Introduction (Paragraph 1, Line 6) Add more information on the applications of More information on the photocatalytic activity of brookite brookite phase. has been added as follow: “Nevertheless, studies have also shown that brookite phase has notably better in photocatalytic performance as compared to those of rutile and anatase [6-14]. For example, Mukarami et al. shows that the brookite powder produced 1100 ppm in 500 min for photocatalytic decomposition of acetaldehyde and exhibit higher photocatalytic activity compared to the other TiO2 powders [9]. In addition, Kandiel et al. had reported that the brookite nanoparticles produced ~17% photonic efficiency which is higher than anatase in methanol photooxidation reaction [7]. Tran et al. had also compared the photocatalytic activity of brookite, anatase and rutile in the pharmaceutical ibuprofen (IBP), the recalcitrant phenol (Ph), and the more reactive cinnamic acid (CA) [6]. The results show that the mineralization shows of brookite (51%) > anatase (50%) > rutile (7%) for photocatalytic degradation in IBP, brookite (15%) > anatase (13%) > rutile (3%) for photocatalytic degradation in Ph and brookite (52%) > anatase (36%) > rutile (38%) for photocatalytic degradation in CA, respectively [6]. Meanwhile, for the brookite film, Alotaibi et al. shows that the brookite film has four times (1.17 x 10-4 molecules per incident photon) superior photocatalytic activity in the destruction of stearic acid compared to an anatase film [15]. Komariah et al. also reported that the brookite film shows 92% photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue after 240 min under visible light irradiation [16].” 10. Section Results and discussion Section Results and discussion (Paragraph 2, Line 12) (Paragraph 2, Line 10) The match JCPDS no. has beed included in the Table 2. Match your JCPDS no with those given in other papers mentioned in Introduction (give references) for spin and sol-gel. Mention the differences in your results as to the phases formed, angle and orientation. 11. Section Results and discussion Section Results and discussion (Paragraph 2, Line 12) (Paragraph 2, Line 12) Table 2 has been added as suggested. Show from previous references, that a single phase brookite is formed via either spin or other coating techniques. Which authors have been successful in doing so and what were their results. You may make a table to show comparison of your work with theirs. 12. Section Results and discussion Section Introduction (Paragraph 2) You need to prove that how your green sol The novelty of green sol-gel route is highlight in Introduction gel route work is novel and different from section, Paragraph 2. others The paragraph 2 was revised as follow: “Many techniques available to deposit the TiO 2 thin films which are hydrothermal treatment, pulsed laser deposition [17], chemical vapour deposition [15], vapor phase [18], spray pyrolysis [19] and sol-gel process [16]. In sol-gel process, the precursor, solvent, catalyst and water plays a remarkable role in the synthesis of TiO2 thin film [20]. Hafizah et al. stated that the precursor such as titanium (IV) isopropoxide (TTIP), titanium tetrachloride (TiCl 4), titanium tetrabutoxide (TBT) and titanium alkoxides serves to develop the TiO2 polymorphs and its crystallinity [21]. Based on different precursors, TTIP is widely used in sol-gel process due to generating stable solution at low hydrolysis ratio [20]. In another hand, catalyst serves to growth and influence the type of phase’s formation as well as its crystallite size. Meanwhile, solvent attends to slow the rate of the hydrolysis and condensation in the sol-gel process that consequently influence the films crystallization, films microstructures, crystallite sizes as well as their photo electrochemical properties [22]. For example, Mahyar and Amani-Ghadim reported that ethanol favourable to produced mixture of anatase and rutile with crystallite size of 14.5 nm and lowest specific surface area, 9.07 m 2g-1 [23]. Thus in common, solvent is widely used for almost all sol formulation during TiO2 thin film deposition. However, it should be highlighted that the long term exposure to solvents can be toxic and harmful to the environmental and human body. This is because, solvents consist of different chemical groups which lead to difference properties especially in the physiological and toxicological aspects [24]. For instance, used of benzene can caused cancer in humans [25]. Moreover, Uzma et al. [26] and Rama et al. [27] also stated that the solvents exposure lead to damage on respiratory, haematological and thyroid functioning. For this reason, researchers had started to initiate work on a green chemistry approach for TiO2 synthesis. Recently, a systematically work carried out as an attempt to produce sol-gel TiO2 thin films with the desired grain size and preferable phases without the use of solvent had been reported by Yazid et al. [20]. Also, Spada et al. had managed to produce anatase and rutile TiO2 nanoparticles without the use of any solvents [28]. Yet, there are no published report on the brookite formation without the use of solvent. Therefore, this work is pioneering an effort on TiO2 deposition for brookite formation via a green sol-gel route.” 13. Section Results and discussion Section Results and discussion There are no references in your results Reviews on related work on brookite formation is summarize supporting the phase from with respect to in Table 1 and Table 2. the type of coating and the reasons for such Section Results and discussion was revised. behavior in the discussion section. This infers that there is no discussion and the peers in your field are not acknowledged. Which is why the manuscript length and especially the results section is too weak and or less content. It is mere of observation only. 14. Section Results and discussion Section Results and discussion (Paragraph 5) (Paragraph 5) The paragraph 5 is discussing on the effect of deposition Give reasons or possible inference for these method of dip and spin coating. results “Thus, it can be confirmed that The effect of temperature is to be discussed according to anatase and rutile are presence in the TiO2 each deposition method, respectively. thin film produced via dip coating at 300°C “Fig. 4 displays the TEM microstructures of the TiO 2 thin and only brookite is presence in the TiO2 thin films deposited via dip coating. It is obvious that the films produced via spin coating at both deposited TiO2 thin film had a spherical shape with a lattice temperature of 200°C and 300°C.” fringes of 0.35 nm and 0.33 nm which can be assigned to the d-spacing of the of anatase (101) and rutile (110), respectively [51-52]. Meanwhile, Fig. 5 shows the TEM microstructures of the TiO2 thin films deposited via spin coating. As shown in the figures, the microstructures had a spherical shape with lattice fringes of 0.28 nm which belong to the (111) plane of brookite [51-52]. Thus, it can be confirmed that anatase and rutile are presence in the TiO2 thin film produced via dip coating and only brookite is presence in the TiO2 thin films produced via spin coating.” Reviewer 2 1. Section Results and discussion Section Results and discussion (Paragraph 1, Line 17) (Paragraph 1, Line 17) The discussion on the absence/not observed crystalline For spin coating, why increase the phase at 400°C and 500°C was carried out in paragraph 1 temperature to 400°C and 500°C, the (line 17). crystallite presence is vanished? The discussion as follow: “The absence of brookite phase formation at high temperature (400°C and 500°C) could be due to its thermodynamically metastable character where it is preferably existing at low temperature [45]. This is also aligned with the finding reported by Allen et al. where in their work, 39.7% brookite crystalline phase at 110°C had reduced to 15.1% when the temperature is increased at 600°C [46]. In addition, brookite is not identified at temperature 700°C and above [46]. The similar observation is also obtained by Li et al. where the amount of brookite decreased when the temperature was increased from 200°C to 400°C with the crystallite size < 10 nm and until it did not identify above 400°C [47]. The absence of the TiO 2 crystalline phase could be due to the no solvent use in the sol formulation. Solvent serves to slow the rate of the hydrolysis and condensation in the sol-gel process. Herman et al. reported that the desorption temperature for water is lower (~250 K) compared to methanol (610 K) [48]. Thus, in this work where no solvent is used, it is expected the higher rate of hydration is observed particularly at high temperature thus crystallization is hindered.” 2. Section Results and discussion Section Results and discussion (Paragraph 1, Line 18) (Paragraph 1, Line 18) The discussion on the amorphous material was revised. Why is an amorphous material presence? The discussion as follow: “The absence of brookite phase formation at high temperature (400°C and 500°C) could be due to its thermodynamically metastable character where it is preferably existing at low temperature [45]. This is also aligned with the finding reported by Allen et al. where in their work, 39.7% brookite crystalline phase at 110°C had reduced to 15.1% when the temperature is increased at 600°C [46]. In addition, brookite is not identified at temperature 700°C and above [46]. The similar observation is also obtained by Li et al. where the amount of brookite decreased when the temperature was increased from 200°C to 400°C with the crystallite size < 10 nm and until it did not identify above 400°C [47]. The absence of the TiO 2 crystalline phase could be due to the no solvent use in the sol formulation. Solvent serves to slow the rate of the hydrolysis and condensation in the sol-gel process. Herman et al. reported that the desorption temperature for water is lower (~250 K) compared to methanol (610 K) [48]. Thus, in this work where no solvent is used, it is expected the higher rate of hydration is observed particularly at high temperature thus crystallization is hindered.”