Harshcharita
Harshcharita
Harshcharita
4.0 OBJECTIVES
This Unit aims and attempts to familiarise you with the following:
• what are kavya and charita texts that characterised prolific literary activity
beginning from Gupta era,
• how are they useful sources for reconstructing history,
• a historical tradition implicit in these literary creations that needs to be inferred,
• kavyas that marked setting of new high and fine standards in textual output
and production of creative literature,
• some important charita compositions you ought to know about, and
• how can change in language of kavyas and charitas be seen as signalling a
historical change.
4.1 INTRODUCTION
After perusing this Course, you shall have comprehensive understanding and bird’s
eye view of expression, presentation, representation and manifestation of historical
awareness across a variety of sources like dana-stutis, gathas, akhyana tradition,
Epics, Itihasa-Purana tradition, Buddhist and Jain traditions, inscriptions, Sangam
* Dr. Abhishek Anand, School of Social Sciences, Indira Gandhi National Open University,
New Delhi 55
History Writing corpus, hagiographies and Bhakti literature, genealogies and family histories
in Early India (vamshavalis), so on and so forth. Historical consciousness assumes different forms
as inherent and embedded in a wide and diverse range of sources and in this Unit,
we will study about kavyas and charitas, bountiful creation and production of which
was not without throwing light on their contemporary events, developments and
changes that enables and assists us in reconstructing and reimagining that history.
As Romila Thapar (2013: 4) correctly and intriguingly remarks, ‘Historical traditions
emanate from a sense of the past’, we will see how in kavyas and charitas a distinct
historical tradition was introduced, imbued and transmitted.
Katha literature in prose genre is discussed in Unit 2. Therefore, in this Unit we
will be dealing with kavya literature under katha genre. Within this our focus will
be on both poems and plays.
5
60 In Prayaga-Prashasti inscription about which you will read in next Unit.
we credit the rising political control, strength, sway and dominion of Pallava Kathas and Charitas
kingdom. He was also an ardent appreciator, connoisseur and patron of early
Tamil cultural development. He is said to have been a poet and dramatist of
some repute and standing, and writer of comedy-play titled Mattavilasa-
prahasana (Delight of Drunkards).
Credit: Praveenp.
Source: Wikimedia Commons (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Thinai_en.svg).
Sangam corpus is not religious literature. Numerous poets composed these poems
praising various heroes and heroines. As such, it belongs to the category of secular
literature and despite being primitive songs, they comprise literature of high quality
and merit when they were penned down subsequently. It seems that these poems
were recited in courts. They refer to some Chera rulers who also appear as donors
in inscriptions of first and second centuries CE. They also mention several
settlements like Kaveripattinam, the flourishing existence of which is archaeologically
evidenced and attested. They also talk about Yavanas coming in their own vessels,
buying pepper in lieu of gold and supplying women slaves and wine to natives. This
62 trade is known not only from Latin and Greek writings but also corroborated from
archaeological findings. As such, despite problematic dating, Sangam poetic Kathas and Charitas
anthologies comprise a major source of historical information on social, political
and economic scenario of deltaic Tamil Nadu in early centuries of first millennium
CE. The information it yields on trade and commerce is confirmed by foreign accounts
and archaeological records.
You will study at length about historical consciousness in Sangam literature in
Unit 7.
Coming from a merchant family, Chattana authored its sequel that continues the
tale and the mood. These poetic works were departures from previous poems and
fables about sword-wielding heroes. Shilappadigarama’s protagonist is heroine 63
History Writing Kannaki/Kannagi. As the story goes, her husband Kovalan’s unfair implication
in Early India for stealing queen’s anklet and his subsequent beheading at king’s order without a
trial brought about a curse on Madurai city. As a chaste and faithful wife, she
eventually ascends as goddess Pattini.
Shilappadigarama and Manimegalai are regarded and classified as Epics but their
subjects are disparate from epic stereotypes. They contain rich imagery of
countryside as well as of the town of Kaveripattinam. Both also underline activities
of daily life or the daily hustle-bustle. Vivid and picturesque description of the
city comes from Manimegalai. Demonstrating classical Tamil style of poetry, they
incorporate many expressions and figures of speech invoking the emotion of love.
Precedent of such style of writing can be gleaned in earlier sangam anthologies.
Likewise, a significant contribution of Kannada poetical literature is the famous
Kavirajamarga dated to 9th century CE.
Development of Tamil poetry was further augmented by a religious movement
(bhakti) that was popularised by groups and communities of teachers/preachers,
hymnologists and poets who are often referred to as ‘saints’ of Tamil devotional
sects. They widely used Tamil in their songs and compositions, pushing further its
evolution and development compared to other southern languages. Absolute
devotion to their deity shaped their primary religious expression. They were seen
and revered as charismatic personalities capable of instructing doctrines of bhakti
and composing dedicational poems. Followers and devotees in large numbers
gathered around them.
Urban landscape is amply underscored in these texts. Shilappadigarama and
Manimegalai, both, focus on centrality of the town and descriptions of urban life.
As stated before, Kaveripattinam, also known as Puhar/Pumpuhar, is vividly
mentioned along with its harbour, merchants’ residences and special part of the
city where Yavanas lived. We get references of paddy from rural areas arriving in
boats to Puhar. Here, it was exchanged in lieu of other merchandise for inland
market centres like Madurai, Kanchipuram and Uraiyur. Puhar is depicted as a
lively city with affluent lifestyle. Commercial production here was linked to trading
in resources from other places:
1) beryl from Palghat,
2) pearls from further south,
3) timber such as ebony, teak and sandalwood from inland forests.
Check Your Progress-1
1) What do you understand by kavya literature? How is historical consciousness
embedded and reflected in such writing?
........................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
2) What do you know about Kalidasa and his literary marvels?
........................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
64
Kathas and Charitas
4.3 CHARITA LITERATURE
Simultaneously coexisting with prashasti epigraphs about which you will study
elaborately in next Unit, we find charitas (biographies or eulogies of kings)
authored by court-poets or writers directly under their tutelage. However, some
decoding is required to understand their purpose. Often, these treatises concentrate
on telling the story about a specific issue concerning and crucial to acquiring of
power. Such a story is weaved into a narrative and expanded into charita text:
1) Harshacharita written by Banabhatta elucidates accession of king Harsha
that entailed usurping the throne and challenging the sanctity of primogeniture
(Harsha was his father-king Prabhakara Vardhana’s younger son).
2) Vikramankadevacharita (biography of Chalukyan ruler of Kalyan – Vikramaditya
VI [late 11th-early 12th century CE]) by Bilhana clarifies why the emperor was
instructed and guided by Lord Shiva himself to overthrow and replace his reigning
elder brother.
3) Ramacharita by Sandhyakara Nandin recounts Pala king Ramapala crushing
the revolt by Kaivartas and successfully reasserting and reinstating his power.
In some charitas and epigraphs the king is represented as an incarnation of Vishnu
or Shiva or being advised directly by the god. This can rightly be construed as yet
another way and form of legitimising kingship. We see expanded versions of
panegyric format of inscriptions being echoed and parallelled in such chronicles.
But, they furnish more detailed histories of rulers and attempt to present kings,
dynasties and regions in an accessible manner. In such capacity they may be said
to be belonging to another category of textual historical sources known as
vamshavalis as their focus is history and historical details of a king, dynasty or
region. Kalhana’s history of Kasmir – Rajatarangini – is unusual and unique in
this regard because he did search for reliable evidence on the past from a variety
of sources. Thus, one cannot deny that his chronicle is an extraordinarily fine
specimen of historical writing as it contains references to actual historical events
and their descriptions that may be deemed historically insightful. Without an iota
of doubt, it is an exceptional literary piece (this is why it is the concern and subject-
matter of a separate, subsequent Unit 6 of this Course), though rooted in vamshavali
genre of writing, due to Kalhana’s extraordinary sense of history. It is also the first
‘history-proper’ written in Indian subcontinent in actual sense of the term.
Another intriguing point worth remembering is that in 12th-13th centuries CE
charitas of some merchants of Gujarat were also penned. A biographical treatise
from south India was discovered, though more might have been written but are
lost. Authored by poet named Atula in 11th century and titled Mushikavamsha, it
recounts achievements of Mushika dynasty that ruled in northern Kerala.
4.3.1 Harshacharita
Harshacharita (The Life of Harsha) is greatest Pushyabhuti king Harshavardhana’s
biography in form of a lively prose narrative attributed to learned scholar
Banabhatta. It is deemed first formal biography of a ruler. It was a prototype of
biographical writing in Sanskrit prose. It began the genre of writing known as charita
literature that was also a prashasti at the same time. Charitas (historical biographies)
became common and fashionable in royal courts in the period to follow.
65
History Writing Notwithstanding the panegyric style, charita literature revolves around some salient
in Early India events. Contemporary perceptions about what was considered significant in events
of a ruler’s reign are provided by charita texts. As such, they must be viewed and
understood from historical perspective of that time rather than being judged from
modern standards of historical writing. Briefly stated before, one immediate reason
for writing charita in this case was surely to validate capture of throne by younger
brother who was a rival of the elder: an act that overturned the law of succession.
Travelling from Kashmir to various places, gifted and accomplished author
Bilhana looked for patronisation, employment, riches and incentives. He was
offered a position at the court of Later Chalukyas where he composed
Vikramankadevacharita. This was, again, a defense of a king capturing the
throne from his elder brother. It is important to remember that the idea of
seeking historical legitimacy spread far and wide. This can be gauged from
shorter chronicles (vamshavalis) on lesser dynasties, for instance, 11th century
Mushakavamshakavya of Atula on a little-known dynasty from Malabar
(present-day northern Kerala) that we made a passing reference to earlier. Style,
content and structure of such vamshavalis was strikingly similar irrespective
of whether they were authored in state of Chamba in Himalayas or in Malabar
(Kerala). What we must remember is that they are immensely significant to us
as kingly, dynastic or regional histories.
Even myths in these texts are sometimes virtually identical. The chronicle traces
mythological beginnings, then progresses towards mentioning founding
ancestors, then to more authentic genealogical history. Crucial points in the story
mark establishment of a kingdom accompanied by categorical changes like more
areas opened to cultivation; founding of a capital city with construction and
consecration of a royal temple symbolic and emblematic of the royal power;
installation of image of king’s deity therein; capital city being connected to
other places through a network of routes; setting up and presence of an
administrative and bureaucratic machinery and permanent standing army; and
inscriptions6 being issued as official versions and declarations of royal decisions
and activities. Subsequently, important events are documented in the chronicle.
4.3.2 Buddhacharita
Ashvaghosha7 authored a long poem on Buddha’s life titled Buddhacharita. It
became famous and is said to be of seminal importance to the rise of historical
biographies. Junagarh Rock Inscription of Rudradaman, about which you will
read at some length in next Unit, is an early example of what was to become
prashasti (eulogy): a style that characterised royal biographies not only in its use
of Sanskrit but also in complying to norms regarding describing a conventional
kshatriya emperor. Such eulogistic epigraphs were also decisive and crucial for
later royal biographies composed as part of courtly culture.
As a blueprint of an ideal king, prashasti denotes entrenching of monarchy in
regions where monarchy had not been so familiar. As a textual format it was
evolving. Apparent in prashasti epigraphs that extol patron-kings, this literary
scheme can be seen even more in Buddhacharita. As a means to validate and
6
You will study about inscriptions as a historical source in next Unit.
7
Some of great creative writers like Ashvaghosha are believed to have been patronised by
Kushanas. Besides Buddhacharita he wrote Saundarananda which is a fine specimen of Sanskrit
66 kavya.
authenticate power, prashasti could portray even chiefs and governors as ideal Kathas and Charitas
kshatriya rulers regardless of their origins. Comparisons of kings, governors and
chiefs with deities had begun but not in an excessive manner. Ironically, association
with divinity became more outspoken when power of the ruler was not so exalted,
except in the case of Kushana title of daivaputra. Dynasties of central Asian origin
exercised choice of investment in local identities and ideologies such as Vaishnavite,
Buddhist or Jain and it is interesting that who chose what (In next Unit you will
read about Heliodorus Pillar Inscription that mentions one of earliest recorded
Greek converts to Vasudeva cult or Bhagavatism).
Ashvaghosha was dexterous in handling Sanskrit. It not only developed as language
of the intelligentsia and the literati in all except peripheral regions, it also now
became preferred language for reflecting on Buddhism. However, local languages
or local Prakrits were not abandoned altogether. But, the tendency to outline and
distinguish high culture, i.e. culture of elite and formally educated, from popular
culture became more prominent.
4.3.3 Ramacharita
We cursorily mentioned about it previously. In this segment we are going to throw
some light on this charita text by Sandhyakara Nandin that is a biography of later
Pala ruler Ramapala. Confronted with the threat of Kaivarta rebellion that aimed
to prevent Pala expansion, the biographical treatise recounts how he suppressed it
through tactfully and diplomatically handling his samantas (feudal lords) and those
with subordinate ruling powers and by means of prompt and timely military effort
and action. Traditionally, Kaivartas were a low caste of peasants and fishermen.
But, retelling of this political event seems to be underlining a revolt by lesser
landowners who might have mobilised Kaivarta farmers. It graphically describes
the process of Ramapala bestowing lavish gifts to samantas and forest-chiefs in
order to ensure their support and alliance. Biographical spotlighting of this historical
event provides a mine of information on relations and their subtleties between
king and his subordinates.
8
Rajashekhara is the same author who penned Kavyamimansa in 9th-10th century CE. It delineates
and explains features of a good poem and in this capacity, it is essentially a practical guide for
68 poets.
as function of the dominant Sanskrit language itself would have followed. No Kathas and Charitas
doubt, Sanskrit was the dominant language but it did not exclude local linguistic
style and rhetoric both at royal court and elsewhere. Surfacing of regional
languages did not occur overnight. These were substratum languages used by
many social groups and communities. When those speaking these languages
rose in status, the status of their language was elevated as well. Identities
were gradually created from multiple creative expressions in literature and
arts. New languages often became carries of new ideas.
Prakrit, being more closely linked to popular speech than Sanskrit, was also encouraged
and promoted outside court circle. Vimalasuri penned Paumachariyam9. It is a Jain
version of Lord Rama’s story. This text is remarkable and notable not only for presenting
views different from those of Valmiki but also for reiterating and foregrounding function
of the Epic as popular literature catering and appealing to the masses. An intriguing
facet of Jain literature was telling episodes from Lord Rama’s story from Jain
perspective’ (for details see Unit 3). Novels by Jain scholars often deviated to a lesser
or greater extent from established versions of Valmiki’s Ramayana.
It is interesting to note that during first millennium CE and early centuries of
second millennium CE writers of heterodox sects – Buddhism and Jainism –
also started authoring their works in Sanskrit, some of which belonged to
charita genre. Sanskrit began to be quite extensively taught and used in both
Buddhist and Jain learning centers. Jain scholar Bhadrabahu II wrote churnis,
niryuktis and bhashyas that were commentaries on sacred treatises of Jains
and we know of Sanskrit compositions as part of Jain religious literary tradition
like Adipurana and Yashatilaka. Jains frequently composed narratives,
chronicles and biographies of rulers and accounts of royal courts in addition
to religious treatises. Scholars and writers kept track of activities of various
Jain sects and their teachings imparted some historical flavour to their
compositions like it was done earlier in Buddhist tradition. In this way, Jain
tradition paralleled and emulated Buddhist tradition with respect to historical
writing. Later composers like Hemachandra in 12th century and Merutunga in
14th century carried forward the tradition and legacy of this genre of writing. A
good example of sophisticated scholarship combining critical interpretation,
explanation and commentary with some history is Dvayashraya-kavya. Jain
texts like Parishishtaparvan and Prabhandhachintamani were modelled on
prabandha (narrative/semi-historical anecdotal accounts) style. Penning
biographies and hagiographies10 incorporated essays on life, preaching and
activities of Mahavira such as Mahaviracharita.
Check Your Progress-2
1) Describe charita form of writing with reference to one charita composition. In
your opinion how can these textual compositions be treated as historical treatises?
................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
9
Written around third century CE, it, curiously enough, mentions Ravana of Ramayana belonging
to Meghavahana lineage of Chedis to which famous ruler Kharavela belonged.
10
You will study about them in Unit 9. 69
History Writing 2) Fill in the blanks:
in Early India
a) ........................ travelled from ........................to various places seeking
fortune and employment until he was given a position at the court of
the ........................ where he wrote ........................ .
b) Ramacharita recounts Pala king Ramapala crushing the revolt
by.............. It was written by ........................ .
c) ........................ was first formal biography of a ruler. It was written
by ......................... .
4.6 SUMMARY
After reading this Unit, you must have learnt that each category of writing in
ancient Indian past has its own way of documenting and capturing that past.
Our colonial masters accused ancient Indians of absence or lack of sense of
history. They took upon themselves the mammoth task of researching and
writing Indian history with view and intent to know about land and people
they aimed and sought to rule and govern and, secondly, to justify their
‘civilising mission/white men’s burden’ and their claim that India was a
primitive land. Yes, ancient Indians did not write history in the way it is done
today and true that India did not produce a Herodotus or Thucydides till the
time of Kalhana who chronicled Rajatarangini as historical narrative of kings
and dynasties of Kashmir in early twelfth century CE.
But, we have amply demonstrated and argued that historical value, significance, scope,
utility and credibility of kavyas and charitas cannot be ignored, sidelined, marginalised
or brushed aside. They display and demonstrate considerable historical sense but history
in these sources is not available ‘readymade’, rather it has to be sifted and culled. As
such, they cannot be dismissed as ‘non-historical’ or ‘ahistorical’ texts as we have
sufficiently and convincingly seen in this Unit. Sharma (2018 [2005]: 23) rightly
observes and surmises about writings of Banabhatta, Kalidasa, Bhasa, Shudraka etc:
Apart from their literary value, they mirror the conditions of the times to
which the writers belonged … Besides being great creative compositions,
they provide us with glimpses of the social and cultural life …
We saw that charitas were essentially based on historical subjects as their plot
revolved around an actual (not mythical), historical figure or personality.
Particularly about Harshacharita Sharma (2018 [2005]: 26) points out:
Although highly exaggerated11, it gives an excellent idea of court life under Harsha
and the social and religious life of his age.
4.7 KEYWORDS
Dharmashastras Ancient Indian manuals/compendiums on moral and
social norms and code of conduct for adherence,
observance and practice by a Hindu. Manava-
dharma-shastra (known as Manusmriti in common
11
It is beyond doubt that the object of charita texts was to applaud, glorify and celebrate the
70 patron.
parlance) is one of them. P. V. Kane in his book Kathas and Charitas
History of Dharmasastra (five volumes in eight
parts) has extensively researched on them
Herodotus Called the father of history, he was a Greek
historian in ancient time. He portrayed a
fascinating and fanciful image of Indian
subcontinent that is said to have tempted
Alexander to invade it
Yavanas Sharma (2018 [2005]: 200) tells us that this
term initially referred to Greeks but over time
it denoted all people of foreign origin