Aser National 2023
Aser National 2023
Facilitated by Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi
ANNUAL STATUS
OF EDUCATION
ASER-PAKISTAN 2023
Provisional
March 08, 2024 NATIONAL
ASER Pakistan 2023
Annual Status of Education Report (ASER) Pakistan
National (Rural)
Date of Publication: March 08,2024.
This is the provisional ASER Pakistan 2023 report based on data received from districts collected by ITA partners by December 31, 2023. The
final ASER Pakistan 2023 report will be available at our website www.aserpakistan.org on March 08, 2023.
Layout & Design by: Muhammad Abubakar, Aftab Ahmad and Waseem Rasheed
Published by:
Lahore Office:
1/A, Canal Park, Gulberg II, Lahore.
Tel: (+92 42) 35711107-9
Islamabad Office:
M4, Mazzanine Floor, Dossal Arcade,
Jinnah Avenue, Blue Area, Islamabad.
Tel: (+92-51) 8748441
Karachi Office:
203, 2nd Floor, Ibrahim Trade Tower,
Shahrah-e-Faisal, Karachi.
Tel: (+92-21) 34322230-1
DISCLAIMER
The information provided in the report does not reflect the views of the donors or the partner organizations.
The opinions expressed in ASER Notes are the views and the property of the individual authors.
2023
Facilitated by Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi
Provisional
March 08, 2024
Content
Findings
National (Rural) 48
Provincial (Rural)
Balochistan 72
Gilgit Baltistan 86
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 100
Punjab 114
Sindh 128
Azad Jammu & Kashmir 142
Annexure
Sample Description 174
Supporters of ASER 2023
The Ministry of Federal Education and Professional Training (MoFEPT) commends ASER Pakistan, a
flagship program of Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi (ITA) for undertaking the largest household-based
national learning assessment survey in 2023 to gauge the foundational literacy and numeracy
proficiency of children in Pakistan between the ages of five and sixteen. ASER's methodology of
collecting the data by mobilizing 11000 volunteers makes it not only unique but also transparent and
inclusive. The MoFE&PT and the provincial governments through ASER 2023 have access to levels of
foundational learning data across Pakistan for formal and non- formal, state and non-state
education systems from ASER Pakistan as a regular benchmark and prime reference document for
SDG 4.1 tracking by the SDG secretariat and also for Article 25 a, the fundamental right to education
in Pakistan.
The Government of Pakistan is pleased to see that ASER Pakistan 2023 records improvement in the
enrollment levels across the country corroborating with the Pakistan Institute of Education (PIE)
2024 Pakistan Education Statistics report, narrowing of gender gaps in enrolment and in learning
due to both demand side factors and supply side efforts of all actors. We are dedicated to the core
principles of inclusion, equity, quality and access in education as our top priorities. To that end we
shall continue to use valuable disaggregated ASER findings for improving foundational literacy and
numeracy and lifelong learning. ASER is a national asset working in close collaboration with public
sector departments of school education and literacy and the MoFEPT to be used extensively in
relevant citations at provincial, national and global levels for lower primary indicator of SDG 4.1.1 a.
ASER 2023 has met a national milestone by covering 123 urban districts alongside 151 rural districts
reaching out to more than 272,370 children aged 3-16, and using an application for real time data
collection. The urban sampling is supported by technical advice from the Pakistan Bureau of
Statistics (PBS) another marker of public private collaboration for rigor, robust and responsible
research. ASER over the years has been providing us information on other vital indicators including
use of technology, climate change, COVID-19 losses, health, disability and functioning.
ASER makes the invisible, visible in 2023 with data on around 2000 transgenders in terms of
enrolment and learning trends, for whom the government has begun initiatives for second chance
learning. This is strong data to build on. Similarly, for the first time in ASER's history there is evidence
of strong learning competencies at upper end for drop outs or OOSC (14 to 18%) nationally for
immediate catch up remedial programs to continue learning and schooling they may have lost out
on due to COVID-19 and floods. This too is a bold call to action for all actors.
The promises we made nationally during the Pakistan Learning Conference, and establishment of
Pakistan Foundational Learning Hub in 2023 are some of the proactive steps that the Government
has taken unanimously in the federation to address the mighty educational challenges faced by
the country. In the years to come, measuring learning losses at national/provincial level is a critical
need for both accountability and action above all.
We are extremely thankful to ASER, ITA teams and their partners across Pakistan including NCHD
for at scale efforts in generating a national repository of time series data set as a public good. This
will help us in making informed policy decisions for implementation, that we fully own.
I thank all the development partners who have supported ASER Pakistan 2023 a singularly massive
effort in democratizing foundational learning data and statistics for Pakistani children and citizens;
it is a compelling investment for all of us in the run up to 2030 and beyond
Every year, ASER's extensive collection of open-source data allows our citizen volunteers to
evaluate Pakistan's educational system by gathering information on the learning outcomes of
children along with household and school level indicators. Our goal is to provide parents and other
local actors with vital information on foundational learning so they can hold local officials and
schools accountable for learning outcomes. This is why we feel that our contribution is so significant
it goes beyond simply to collect the annual data mapping children's learning progress. We are proud
of having established ourselves as a vital component of the change ecosystem, serving as a
catalyst for bottom-up accountability and action to enhance learning in schools and to bring much
needed attention to the core dimensions of access, learning and equity for tracking 25-A, right to
education and SDG 4.
We are certain that ASER Pakistan 2023 can make significant progress in converting data into
action. In addition to capacity building and partnerships provided by ITA teams through ASER
Pakistan, we as civil society and autonomous organizations are extended a forum to collaborate
and create solutions with the local community. Embarking on the journey of collecting real time data
from the field, and reaching out to both urban and rural areas to present the first National
Foundational Learning profile, we believe that ASER/ITA Pakistan, has the potential of changing the
educational landscape in the years to come. We, as local supporters and partners are proud of our
association with such an evidence based democratic citizen-led movement, from assessment to
accountability to action!
Foundational learning is defined as basic literacy, numeracy, and transferable skills such
as socioemotional skills that provide the fundamental building blocks for all other
learning, knowledge, and higher-order skills. The Annual Status of Education Report
(ASER), a flagship program by Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi (ITA) has been providing policy
makers and practitioners with an important measure of foundational literacy and
numeracy levels for children aged 5-16 years across Pakistan since 2009. ASER - a call
to action for stepping up efforts to improve foundational learning, is an essential public
good produced by civil society in close collaboration with the government.
ASER 2023 marks yet another important milestone in this journey, providing household-
based learning data for children across 151 rural and 123 urban districts. This is a huge
undertaking reaching out to 272,370 children 3-16 years and 200,987 children age 5-16
years whose learning levels have been assessed using a simple grade two level tool
(lower primary), robustly mapped to SDG 4.1.1 a and the national/ provincial curriculum
student learning outcomes (SLOs), in rural Pakistan. ASER fills a critical gap in learning
data as no other national or provincial assessment in Pakistan has consistently
measured learning levels in early grades. By measuring learning for children across the
ages of 5-16, ASER also shows that children who are not learning the basics by grade 3,
continue to struggle, with foundational learning gaps persisting in grades 5, 8 and even
10. South -South learning networks, such as the PAL Network, of which ASER Pakistan
is an integral member, are making a powerful case to focus efforts on foundational
learning.
ASER provides open data on foundational learning, along with a host of other important
education indicators, and is a national repository for evidence, mobilization, and actions
for learning solutions. ASER is a reliable, meaningful measure of student learning and
provides comparability over time, so that we can tell if things are improving or not. It can
be used for reporting on SDG 4.1.1 a and Article 25-A of the Constitution of Pakistan, as
a model of good practice and accountability for foundational learning results.
We commend the efforts of the Government of Pakistan, both at Federal and Provincial
levels, in pursuing this fundamental policy priority with the utmost focus and resolve.
This is evident in the commitments made by the Government at the Pakistan Learning
Conference, along with actions that are underway to deliver on these commitments, and
the establishment of the Pakistan Foundational Learning Hub in 2022. Going forward a
comprehensive response requires the Government to map existing programmes,
leverage existing and new data to strengthen the case for investment in foundational
learning, develop a common tool to measure and report on learning, assess learning
losses at national/provincial level and provide teachers with tools for classroom-level
measurement; adjust curriculum across and within subjects to support all children to
acquire literacy, numeracy, and socio-emotional skills; align instruction with learning
levels and needs ensuring continuous support for teachers and better use of teaching
time ensuring children are taught at their correct learning level rather than by age or
grade; and ensure teachers have access to high quality teaching materials. As a first
step, and to complement ASER, we call on the Government to design and deploy a
large-scale, nationally, and provincially representative, comparable learning data over
time to know whether students are learning, which are being left behind and to
understand where to adjust education policies and practices based on agreed minimum
proficiency levels.
NOTES ON
ASER
09 ASER Pakistan 2023
Inequities in Access and Learning
Dr. Faisal Bari
Senior Research Fellow
Institute of Development and Economic Alternatives
Imagine a boy born in a high income/wealth household in Karachi and a girl born in a low
income/wealth household in rural Baluchistan. Will these two children, both children of the same
country, have equal opportunities for accessing education and for learning? Clearly not. The boy in
Karachi would probably get enrolled in one of the high-fee private schools, appear for IB or A'
Levels eventually and then, possibly, go abroad for his undergraduate education. The girl from
rural Baluchistan will have a hard time surviving infancy and early childhood. If she does, there is a
significant probability she will not have access to a primary school. Even if she finishes primary, the
chances of her making it to high school and successfully completing matriculation examination is
in low single digits.
Article 25A: “The State shall provide free and compulsory education to all children of the age of
five to sixteen years in such manner as may be determined by law.” Article 25A was added to the
basic rights section of the Constitution of the country in 2010. There were laws for universal
primary education even before then but the right to education, for all children and, in fact, the
obligation (free and compulsory) to educate ALL children for 10 odd years was added to the
Constitution in 2010. The tragedy is, despite the constitutional promise we are no closer to
fulfilling this promise to our children then we were in 2010. By latest estimates more than 26
million children between the ages of five to sixteen years are out of schools in Pakistan. We have
report after report, including many rounds of Annual Status of Education (ASER) data that show
that the majority of children who are enrolled in schools have been and are getting poor quality of
education. This has been corroborated by reports from the World Bank as well. Grade 5 children
can hardly do grade 3 work, and many children in grade 8 are not able to read paragraphs and do
simple mathematics. We are simply not living up to the promises we have made, implicitly and
explicitly, to our children as far as educational opportunities to access and quality are concerned.
Since the 1980s we, as state and society, have also encouraged the private sector to develop as a
provider of education services at both K-12 and university level. Today we have an education
system in the country that is extremely differentiated, fragmented, diverse and iniquitous.
Educational institutions vary along many variables. Students can go to madrassas for religious
education or mainstream schools for 'modern' education. Education can be in formal schools,
informal schools and even in evening academies. Students can appear as 'private candidates' in
public examinations if they have studied but are not enrolled in any registered school. Language of
instruction can be local (in early years), Urdu or English. Textbooks can be state published ones,
published by private publishers or even imported. School leaving examinations can be Dars e
Nizami, matriculation, or foreign assessments like O and A' Levels, International Baccalaureate (IB)
or American High School diploma. Madrassas do not, normally, charge for Dars e Nizami and even
boarding and lodging is paid for. Government schools do not charge tuition fees and used to
provide textbooks too. Private not-for-profit schools have low or no fees, while for-profit schools
charge tuition fees based on the segment of the population they want to serve and the quality of
education, in reality or in parental perceptions, they are able to deliver. Tuition fees of Rs. 50,000
per child per month are quite normal in high-fee schools. The very expensive ones go to almost Rs.
100,000 per child per month.
ASER 2023 round results do show this clearly. When ASER data is divided into quartiles by parental
income and wealth (on an asset-based index), we see patterns in access to quality education quite
clearly. 73 percent of children from the poorest quartile are enrolled in ASER data, while 83
percent of children are enrolled from the richest quartile. Only 67 percent of girls from the poorest
quartile are enrolled while 84 percent of the boys from richest quartile are enrolled. Income and
wealth have an impact on access to education.
Though it has been hard to pin down quality differences across types of schools, private and public,
rigourously, causally and precisely, but most data sets, including multiple rounds of ASER, do show
that assessment results are better for private schools than government schools. This is true for
even low-fee private schools. High-fee private schools, of course, offer much better quality of
education. ASER 2023 data show parents are aware of these differences. Of the children enrolled
in government schools 35 percent come from the lowest income quartile while 25 percent come
from the richest quartile. For the private schools, only 17 percent of the children enrolled in private
schools come from the poorest quartile while 32 percent come from the richest quartile. Access to
private education is tied to income/wealth levels.
Getting extra coaching, called tuition in Pakistan and usually done after school hours, has become
quite prevalent in our society. ASER 2023 data shows that those who attend private tuition do
have, on average, better grades than those who do not have tuition. So, tuition matters. But tuition
costs, and ability to get your child tuition is tied to parental income and wealth. ASER data shows
that only 6 percent of children from the poorest quartile get tuition while the percentage goes up
to 14 and 11 percent for the top two quartiles.
It is not surprising then that learning outcomes would be different for children from different
income/wealth quartiles. Only 24 percent of children from the poorest quartile are at a level
where they can read a simple story in Urdu, 43 percent of children from the richest quartile can do
that. 25 percent of children from poorest quartile can read a sentence in English, 41 percent from
the richest quartile are able to do that.
We have not talked about differently abled children here so far. All populations are expected to
have 10-12 percent of people who are differently abled. We have data in Pakistan that shows that
differently abled children are more likely to never enroll, are more likely to drop out early and are
more likely to be ignored in the learning process even if they happen to be in classes. This is
another dimension of the discrimination and differentiation that exists in Pakistan.
What does it mean to have a 'right to education' when 26 million children from the relevant age
bracket do not have access to schools. What will we promise the girl born in a poor household in
rural Baluchistan? As of now it seems to be the case that we are telling the girl that she will not get
access to quality education. We do not have enough public schools across Pakistan and the quality
of education being given by public schools, on average, is very poor. Since the girl's parents do not
have resources to move her to the city and/or buy her quality education from the private
providers, she will, most likely have to be another person in the 26 million who do not get to go to
school.
The solution is in trying to raise the quality of education that is being offered by government
schools and to extend the network of schools/education programmes to get the out of school
children access as well. If government schools could offer a minimum standard of quality that gave
students access to meaningful and decent education, it would automatically force low-fee private
schools to raise their quality to at least that level if not higher otherwise parents will move children
out of private schools. If government schools could offer decent quality at no cost (zero tuition and
with distribution of books, stationary, uniforms and, possibly, access to transport) Article 25A
could be given some meaning and substance. It would still be the case that very rich households
will be able to get a higher quality by paying a lot more, and there is not much we can or should do
about this, but, at least, the children from the poorest household would have access to at least a
minimum quality that would allow them to move ahead in life. This is the only way the girl from the
poor household in rural Baluchistan is going to have any opportunity for getting a decent
education.
ASER 2023 data confirms that household income and wealth are important for access to quality
education in Pakistan. If you have the resources, you can get good quality, but if you do not, you
might be without schooling (26 million children) or have access to poor quality education. This
does not come as a surprise. We know we have a very fragmented, differentiated and divided
education system in Pakistan. The key question, for policy makers in particular and for the society
at large is how do we reconcile these facts with the promise of the basic right to education (Article
25A of the Constitution). Do children have the right to education or not? If they do, it has to be
irrespective of their parental income, geography, gender or any other variable. It has been 13 years
since the inclusion of Article 25A in the Constitution and we have not yet answered this basic
question.
Pakistan ranks as the 5th most vulnerable country to the impacts of climate change according to
the Global Climate Risk Index (UN Habitat, 2023). Climate change and displacement caused by
rising global temperatures exacerbate the inequalities and barriers that already exist. In
particular, the effects of these are felt more deeply by those belonging to more socio-
economically disadvantaged backgrounds, by women and girls, rural communities, and persons
with disabilities (UNESCO, 2023). The climate crisis also intersects with another crisis –
interruptions to education and learning and the resulting widening inequalities caused by the
Covid-19 pandemic.
There is evidence to show that disasters are now increasing in severity and occurring almost five
times as often as they did 40 years ago and these disasters are disrupting the education of nearly
40 million children a year. The effects of these disasters on education are direct and indirect –
flooding, for example destroys schools, droughts result in children having to go further to collect
water, financial impacts of climate shocks mean families cannot afford to keep children in school.
Even when children stay in school, environmental changes such as temperature increases and
high levels of pollution make learning difficult, as children's physical wellbeing and ability to
concentrate are compromised (FCDO Position Paper: The Climate Crisis and Girls' Education).
Current, high-quality research in global contexts shows that without urgent action, climate
change will make it increasingly challenging to achieve a quality education. This is especially true
for disadvantaged populations. Young Lives research has shown how childhood exposure to
climate shocks such as droughts and floods can have an unequal impact on children's long term
development and especially on girls and young women who bear the burden of these challenges.
Research from Pakistan by Andrabi et al. (2020) that explores the impact of a disaster – the
earthquake in Pakistan in 2005 – on student learning shows that it is important to assess children
when they return to school post-disasters (earthquakes, pandemics etc.) to ensure they can be
taught at the right level. It also shows the need for supporting communities in adapting and
responding to 'what works' for them to improve schooling.
This year's Annual Status of Education Report (ASER 2023) has, for the first time, collected rich
data on various indicators aimed at capturing self-reported indicators of some of the
vulnerabilities that individuals across Pakistan face. Households across the country have been
asked questions on aspects such as whether their household was affected by the floods in 2022,
whether or not they are a refugee household and whether their family has been affected in any
way by a natural disaster. The household survey sheet also included questions on whether the
respondent believes themselves to be informed about what climate change is, whether (and by
how much) the household's income was affected by the reported natural disaster, whether
children's schooling was affected and whether the respondent's psychological wellbeing was
affected by the incident. For the first time, we have data on 89,551 rural households, across 4,381
villages, in 151 districts on these critical aspects.
Figure 1: Household self-reports on whether it was affected by the 2022 floods, rural
When training the enumerators, the volunteers were instructed to explain to the respondents that the term covers phenomena such as floods,
droughts, earthquakes, cyclones, wildfire etc. which may have affected them in the past year.
ASER Pakistan 2023 14
These climate related vulnerabilities also affect children the most - the recent floods of 2022
clearly indicated how children and their education was gravely affected across Pakistan (MPDSI,
2022). Idara e Taleem o Aagahi (ITA), in partnership with FCDO and the Sindh Education and
Literacy Department (SELD), implemented the 'Foundational Learning Recovery: Flood Response
in Sindh' programme in Shikarpur and Ghotki districts in Sindh. The programme consisted of three
intervention arms including support in the form of materials and resources through distribution of
back-to-school kits, school stabilization kits, and health and hygiene kits, and a 60-day Teaching at
the Right Level (TaRL)-based, accelerated learning camps to boost learning of in-school children in
grades 3-5 and for out of school children aged 6-13 years; and a micro-intervention in two villages
from the target districts. A total of 210,000 children benefitted from the programme (i.e.,
intervention I, II, and III), out of which 30,873 children attended the TaRL-camps. Nearly 80 per
cent those who attended the accelerated learning camps were mainstreamed into public schools.
The assessment results from TaRL-based learning camps show significant improvements in
learning levels across all 4 cohorts and the 3 subjects i.e., Sindhi, Arithmetic and English.
The decline in earnings reported as a result of natural disasters by respondents is likely to have an
adverse impact on children's education. We know that climate shocks reduce incomes and this
exacerbates a major barrier to education especially for the poorest, girls and children with
disabilities. The limited resources on hand available to households are diverted for survival
instead of for learning, trapping vulnerable populations in a vicious cycle of marginalisation, and
vulnerability, facing school drop-out, child labour and in the case of girls, early marriage and early
pregnancy. The impacts of climate shocks will have long lasting effects on the wellbeing, learning,
life and economic outcomes of those directly affected but are also likely to be transmitted across
future generations.
¹https://cdpr.org.pk/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Foundational-Learning-during-Emergencies-Learning-is-Not-a-Lost-1.pdf
Other findings in ASER 2023 allude to the effects of these events on children's learning – there is a
visible and significant decline in children's learning across most regions and whilst we can't
attribute this decline directly to these events without more sophisticated analysis, it is safe to
conclude that the school closures and lost schooling days from these events would have
contributed to this learning loss. Figures 4 and 5 present the learning levels of percentage of grade
5 students who are able to read an Urdu story and the percentage of class 5 students who are able
to do two-digit division, comparing the learning levels in 2014, 2019 (pre-pandemic) and the
subsequent rounds of ASER (2021 and the most recent in 2023). There are some very striking
findings apparent in these graphs. Firstly, it is worth noting that for Urdu and Arithmetic learning
nationally, a larger percentage of children know how to read a story in Urdu or do division in 2023
(50% and 46.3% respectively) as compared to in 2014 (46.4% and 40.4% respectively). However, in
2019, before the pandemic hit, the percentage of children who could read an Urdu story or do
division nationally had improved by 12.7 percentage points and 16.5 percentage points
respectively. There is a noticeable decline in learning outcomes after the pandemic (comparing
2019 to 2021) in both Urdu and Arithmetic outcomes nationally and, similarly, there appears to be
another declining trend between 2021 and 2023. This decline is larger in some regions than in
others – we observe a small decline in the flood-impacted provinces of Balochistan and Sindh, but
larger declines are visible in Punjab and Sindh in mathematics outcomes and in Punjab and KPK in
Urdu outcomes.
Figure 4: Percentage of children who can read an Urdu story (5-16 years), rural, by region
100
National
80 Balochistan
GB
60 KPK
59
55 Punjab
50
46 Sindh
40 AJK
20
0
2014 2019 2021 2023
80
National
70
Balochistan
57
60
51 GB
46
50 KPK
40
40 Punjab
30 Sindh
AJK
20
10
0
2014 2019 2021 2023
The low levels of learning and their persistent nature in Pakistan is a cause for concern. The trends
over the 9-year period between 2014-2023 suggest persistently low and declining learning levels
across many regions in the country. Climate and environmental change pose an accelerating
threat to the education of the most marginalised and poorest and especially girls and taking stock
if this situation and planning for it is critical for Pakistan since 18% of rural girls aged 5-16 remain
out of school as per the latest ASER figures. Pakistan stands at a crucial juncture – we know that
many education systems are consistently failing the majority of children – many children in
Pakistan can't read a simple text or do simple arithmetic. We know that Covid-19 was the biggest
disruption to education in recent history and will continue to have long-lasting effects on access
and learning. We know that natural disasters and conflict take children out of school and reduce
their chances of re-entering the education system. We know that climate and environmental
changes are likely to exacerbate conflict for scarce resources. And finally, we know that the burden
of these climate-related incidents is most likely to be felt by the most marginalised, the most
vulnerable – climate change will intensify these inequalities even more and will reverse any gains
made in getting children into school and to give them a meaningful education.
What does it take to gather nationwide evidence on All Children Learning? ASER 2023 results are a
contribution towards that ambition as a public good. There has been a growing movement for
almost two decades to uncover the challenges of children unable to read and count at basic levels.
Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 2 (2000-2015) focused on access; the absence of 'quality
and learning' remained a matter of grave concern. Why was learning short changed in MDGs in
spite of bold calls for quality in Education For All (EFA) global gatherings in Jomtien (1990) and
Dakar (2000)? There was an urgency to make foundational literacy and numeracy in early grades a
pre-requisite and essential building blocks for lifelong learning. The movement to harness and
support child's learning capabilities as a fundamental entitlement began in 2005/6 in the global
South to influence the architecture of the MDGs successor, SDGs 2030 and in particular SDG 4
goal, targets and indicators in 2015.
The Annual Status of Education Report (ASER) Pakistan is a flagship program by Idara-e-Taleem-o-
Aagahi (ITA) since 2009/10 focused on foundational learning (FL) working in close collaboration
with the government assessment bodies within the federation. ASER is a citizen-led household-
based national survey measuring each child's learning one on one for competencies mapped to
the national/provincial curriculum and standards for languages (Urdu/Sindhi), English and
Arithmetic. It is equivalent to SDG 4.1.1a indicator at lower primary level. Since 2010 ASER surveys
have been informing all stakeholders about the status of FL early in children's schooling journey as
a benchmark indicator to inform policies, sector plans and programs to address quality, equity,
inclusion and access. ASER Pakistan surveys are a citizens' accountability measure for the
fundamental constitutional right to education upheld in Article 25 A, as part of the Eighteenth
Constitutional Amendment (2010) for ALL children of Pakistan without discrimination aged 5-16
years. Quality translates into equity when early learning gaps lead to children falling behind,
repeating grades, dropping out of school, or not enrolling, exacerbated by gender, wealth and
geography. A girl child in the poorest wealth quartile, may not only lag behind her male siblings in
the same household and across other wealth bands in learning and enrolment but may be even
more fragile if she lives in rural areas or urban slums and suffers from any disability. When
deprived of the foundational learning vaccine her entitlements are undermined, possibly leading
to intergenerational deprivation; exclusions countries can ill afford.
Since 2010 ASER Pakistan has been sharing disaggregated trends on foundational learning boldly
for provinces and areas covering all rural, representative urban districts and recently urban slums.
These reveal clearly that when grade 3 children struggle in grade 2 level basic competencies, the
challenge tragically persists. Learning mapped to ASER's grade 2 level tool is reported for children
in grades 1-10 (5-16 years)
h ps://palnetwork.org/ - - -a-campaign/
Pratham, a civil society organiza on in India began ci zen led, household-based assessments for founda onal learning competencies (grade level) in the
beginning of the Global South movement.
PIRLS: Progress in Interna onal Reading Literacy Study, PILNA: Pacific Islands Literacy and Numeracy Assessment, PASEC: Programme d'Analyse des
Systemes Educa fs de la CONFEMEN, ERCE: Regional Compara ve & Explanatory Study
Call for Ac on at the Transforming Educa on Summit ( )
Global Coali on for Founda onal Learning
Pakistan Founda onal Learning (PFL) Hub ( )
19 ASER Pakistan 2023
Official educa on GDP expenditure reported is . % (Economic Survey of Pakistan - -Chapt. ) Call for Ac on at the Transforming Educa on Summit ( )
ASER Pakistan 2023 20
Learning Outcomes for Dropped-Out Children in Rural Pakistan
and the Challenge of Mainstreaming
Zulfiqar Ali & Anisha Saleem
Data Analysts, ITA-ASER
With a growing young and an expanding population, Pakistan currently has over 63 million
children between the ages of five and sixteen. Out of these, only 27 million (42%), are served by
the public school system; over 20 million (32%), are not enrolled in school at all; and over 16 million
(26%), are enrolled in private, nonprofit, or non-formal educational institutions¹. There have been
efforts by the government and various national and international organizations to address the
issue of out of school children and mainstreaming them into regular schools while also introducing
alternative learning models. Still, Pakistan is miles away from meeting SDG indicator 4.1.4. (Out of
school rate 1 year before primary, primary education, lower secondary education, upper
secondary education).
According to the recently released report of Pakistan Institute of Education (PIE) in the Pakistan
Education Statistics (PES) report, there are 26.2 million out-of-school children for the year 2021-
2022. ASER 2023 survey shows that approximately 14% of children are out of schools in rural areas
of Pakistan. Out of all those who are currently not in school, 5% have dropped out from schools.
The trade-off between attending school and staying at home is greatly impacted by the nation's
high rate of inflation and political unrest in addition to a host of other problems. As stated by the
ASER 2023 findings, the main reasons for dropping out of school are Covid-19 (31%), Law and
Order (20%), Migration (19%), Poverty (10%), and others (20%). Several other reasons for
dropping out are clubbed in the “other” category that includes child labor, child marriage,
academic difficulties, low returns to education etc. Individually the percentages for all the other 14
reasons for dropping out of schools are very low.
20%
31%
10%
19%
20%
h ps://mathsandscience.pk/publica ons/the-missing-third/
21 ASER Pakistan 2023
Figure 2: Percentage of dropped out children (Age 5-16) by gender
Percentage Of Dropped Out by Gender
male female
6.9 6.7
4.0 4.1
3.8
3.4 3.6
3.1 3.0
2.8
1.4
1.0 0.9
0.6
Nationally it can be seen that more females are out of schools than males. 4% females and 4%
males have dropped out as per the bar chart above. Balochistan has the highest percentage of
dropped-out children. By gender more males in Balochistan as compared to females have dropped
out. More females in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa have dropped out than females in Sindh and Punjab
who are of the ages between 5-16 years.
Figure 3: Learning level (%) of out of school children (Age 5-16)
Learning Levels Of Out Of School Children
Learning Level Urdu (story) Learning Level English (Sentences) Learning Level Arithme c (division)
18
17 17
16 16
14
13 13
12 12 12
11 11
10
9
5
4 4 4
3 3
The ASER 2023 data indicates prior learning of children. The highest level of learning for Urdu in
the ASER survey is story reading. It can be seen from the bar chart above that 18% of children, who
have dropped out of schools in Balochistan, can read stories in Urdu which is closely followed by
Punjab and Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Sentence reading is the highest competency for English
Learning on the ASER English tool. 17% of students in Punjab and 16% children in Baluchistan stand
at this level. Only a meager 3% of dropped-out children in Sindh can read sentences in English.
Children who left schools but can read English sentences fluently in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa are 5% as
compared to 12% in Gilgit-Baltistan. Similarly, 17% of dropped-out children in Balochistan can do a
These are the children who can be provided with remedial learning programs and then
mainstreamed back to the education stream. Government and private entities who are working
for the provision of catchup/remedial learning programs for out-of-school children should start by
identifying such children at the ground level.
Table 1: Learning level (%) of out of school children (Age 5-16) by gender & provinces
Na onal 16 9 15 9 14 8
Punjab 14 18 16 17 13 14
Sindh 4 4 3 3 3 3
Baluchistan 25 12 22 12 21 11
KPK 6 3 7 4 5 3
GB 11 8 14 7 12 5
AJK 18 9 18 7 16 7
Out-of-school children (male) have higher competencies in Urdu, English, and Mathematics
compared to female children aged 5 to 16. Nationally 16% male and 9% female dropped-out
children can read a story in Urdu. 15% male and 9% females can read a set of two sentences in
English fluently. 14% male and 8% females can solve a two-digit division question, which is the
highest learning level in Numeracy/Mathematics.
25% male children in Balochistan can read a story in Urdu and that is followed by 18% males in AJK.
18% female children in Punjab can read an Urdu story which is the highest amongst all the
provinces that is then followed by 12% females in Balochistan. It is interesting that children who
have dropped out of school in Balochistan have better literacy skills than their counterparts in all
the other provinces. These students can be identified in a timely manner and brought back to the
schools. Around 22% males and 12% females in Balochistan can read sentences in English fluently
which is highest among all the provinces. 18% males in AJK can read sentences which is second
highest across all the other provinces. 17% of female out-of-school children can read sentences in
English. 21% males and 14% female dropped-out children can solve a two-digit division question in
Mathematics.
Ÿ All the stakeholders who are working in the area of remedial learning programs for out-of-
school children should identify such children who have the learning competencies but are
not enrolled in schools.
Ÿ Alternative learning models should be adopted and implemented to make them stay within
the education system.
Ÿ International best practices should be adopted, and Article 25-A of the constitution should
be implemented in letter and spirit.
Ÿ Resources and right interventions should be targeted in consultation with education
champions and service providers.
Ÿ Table 2: Reasons for dropping out of school for grades 2, 3, 5 & 8
Top 4 Dropped-Out Reasons
Top 4 Dropped-
out Grades Law and
Poverty Migration Covid-19
Order
2 14% 9% 27% 32%
3 10% 7% 25% 41%
5 12% 13% 11% 44%
8 23% 9% 12% 35%
Ÿ ASER 2023 shows that 31% of the children leave school after grade 5 which is the highest in
any grade. Covid-19 accounts for 44% and poverty (13%) of the reasons for dropping out
followed by law and order (12%) at this level. The government should incentivize and put a
check at grade 5 where most of the children change schools, which at times are not available
in the same village, therefore they are left with no choice but to leave schools.
Strong global evidence indicates that disasters have a long-term, negative impact on learning
(Baez, de la Fuente and Santos, 2010). Past crises in Pakistan also demonstrate this to be true, such
as the 2005 earthquake which substantially reduced children's learning outcomes four years
later². Even prior to the floods, the education system had not quite recovered from the COVID-19
related learning losses caused by school closures during the pandemic. Childrens' sustained lower
learning levels have far-reaching consequences for the already dismal state of Pakistan's human
capital, which is one of the lowest in the region.
The latest ASER data on Sindh offers critical insight into schooling access and foundational learning
trends in flood affected districts. Additionally, it also attempts to gauge the various aspects of the
impact of the flood emergency on households. In context of these findings, evidence-based and
innovative interventions to recover learning in emergencies can be considered.
The overall share of enrolled children (age 6-16 years) in Sindh is around 85% according to the
latest ASER 2023 cycle, which is despite the significant decrease in enrollment in 2021 relative to
2019 (80% as compared to 88%). Considering that two major shocks have impacted the education
system in Sindh i.e., COVID-19 and the 2022 floods, the recovery in enrolment is reassuring. This
trend is also reflected in the flood affected districts although with a large degree of variation.
Ghotki
90 Sukkur
Shikarpur
80 Larkana
Kashmore
Kambar Shahdad Kot
70
Khairpur
Mirpur Khas
60
2019 2021 2023
The learning losses are far more pronounced for children of age group 6-13 years, reflecting a
foundational learning crisis among primary- and middle-school going age children. Even more
striking is the gender gap in learning levels among children of age 6-13 years which has also
widened over time. The share of girls (6-13 years) who can read a Sindhi story was 22% in 2019 as
compared to 25% for boys; whereas in 2023 only 15% girls can read a Sindhi story relative to 19%
boys.
Households in Sindh were hit particularly hard by the climate-induced disaster. In Sindh, a
substantial share (34%) of surveyed households reported being “significantly” affected by
flooding in 2022. Across flood affected districts, the percentage of households “significantly”
Loss of livelihood and displacement increased financial stress on households. Overall, 18% of
surveyed households in Sindh reported their earning being negatively impacted by “more than
50%” due to flooding. Cross district variation is even more stark; the same level of income loss was
reported in Khairpur (77%), Shikarpur (45%), Larkana (43%), Sukkur (39%), Kambar Shahdad Kot
(16%), and Mirpurkhas (11%). Increase in socio-economic strain also impacted the mental health
of household respondents; 28% households reported that their emotional and psychological well-
being was “substantially affected” due to climate change. In districts that were worst hit by the
floods, this percentage was significantly higher; Khairpur (74%), Larkana (66%), Mirpur Khas
(45%), Sukkur (34%), Kambar Shahdad Kot (18%), Shikarpur (34%), and Ghotki (14%).
Education suffered major set-backs as learning was interrupted due to the flood-induced damage
to infrastructure, use of schools as emergency shelters, and increase in travel time due to
flooding⁴. This is also reflected in the latest ASER findings as 25% households in Sindh reported
their children's schooling being “extremely affected” due to floods in 2022. In severely affected
districts a higher share reported being “extremely affected”; Khairpur (76%), Larkana (59%),
Shikarpur (41%), Sukkur (25%), Mirpur Khas (32%), Kambar Shahdad Kot (30%), and Kashmore
(13%).
Awareness regarding climate change remains poor even in Sindh districts that were severely
impacted by floods. Only 57% in Shikarpur reported being “informed” about climate change; 55%
Larkana; 53% Kashmore; 50% Mirpur Khas; 33% in Sukkur; 30% in Kambar Shahdad Kot; and 21% in
Ghotki.
In addition to receiving relief kits, 30,879 children also received remedial education through
“Chalo Parho Barho/Teaching at the Right Level (TARL)” learning camps to address gaps in
h ps://blogs.worldbank.org/endpovertyinsouthasia/pakistans-floods-are-deepening-its-learning-crisis
h ps://blogs.worldbank.org/endpovertyinsouthasia/how-are-children-pakistans- -floods-faring
27 ASER Pakistan 2023
foundational learning. 775 TARL-based learning camps were set up on government school
premises to provide remedial instruction to in-school children within grade 3-5, and out-of-school
children of ages 6-13 years. The accelerated learning camps facilitated student learning through
structured and interactive activities to improve reading, writing, listening, speaking and practice in
the three core subjects of Sindhi, Arithmetic and English. After the successful completion of the
60-day TARL-camp cycle, the children (including those out of school) were mainstreamed into
public schools.
Chalo Parho Barho/TARL-based learning camps in Ghotki and Shikarpur improved basic literacy
and numeracy among the 30,000+ beneficiary children. The results from periodic learning
assessments (baseline, midline and endline) using ASER & International Common Assessment of
Numeracy (ICAN) tools indicate steep gains; at endline 47% children could read a Sindhi story as
compared to only 3% at baseline, at endline 44% could do two-digit division as compared to only
3% at baseline, and 63% could read an English sentence at endline as opposed to only 2% at
baseline.
20%
3% 3% 2%
0%
% that can read a Sindhi story % that can do two-digit % that can read an English
division sentence
Way Forward
The crisis in foundational literacy and numeracy pre-dates the emergencies in Sindh i.e., COVID-19
and the 2022 floods. The learning losses remain persistent despite the recovery in enrolment,
especially in flood affected districts. The promising results of Chalo Parho Barho/TARL-based
learning camps in Ghotki and Shikarpur in Sindh indicate that short-burst, intensive TARL-based
learning camps can be adopted as a potential model for foundational learning recovery in
emergency contexts. Beyond its application through short-term learning camps, TARL can be
made part of mainstream teacher training programs to be used in regular grades along with
tailored content, assessments, pedagogy, and teaching learning materials (TLMs). TARL can also be
incorporated into mainstream schools through a “Reading/Literacy Hour” to improve
foundational learning. The slight recovery in enrolment trends in Sindh is a bright spot despite the
continued challenges to learning. There is a pressing need for timely and effective action to close
the gaps in basic learning and secure prosperity for future generations.
TECHNICAL
NOTE
31 ASER Pakistan 2023
Pakistan is at a crossroads. On one hand, the country currently has the youngest population in its
history (65% is below the age of 30 while 29% is between the ages of 15 to 29 years), which if
equipped with relevant technical skills can result in dividends for the national economy. On the
other hand, majority of the workforce lacks advanced skills required by the global labor markets;
according to the ILO (2019) only 6% of youth have acquired technical vocational skills. The
increasing share of unskilled working-age population threatens to become a demographic bomb,
spelling potential disaster for the country.
The dismal reality is that Pakistan's human capital remains low and has only marginally grown
over the past three decades. Pakistan's Human Capital Index (HCI) lies around 0.41, which is
significantly lower than the regional average of 0.48 in South Asia. To remedy the situation, it is
imperative to effectively tackle the prevailing crisis in the education sector.
Adverse shocks in the form of the COVID-19 pandemic and the devastating floods in 2022 have
further worsened the education emergency. Before COVID-19, World Bank had estimated that 3
in 4 children in Pakistan were in learning poverty, whereas during COVID-19 the estimated
learning poverty increased to more than 79%.
Before the COVID-19 related learning losses could be fully recovered, the country was faced with
the unprecedented destruction caused by the floods in June-August 2022. Around 34,000 schools
were damaged (UNICEF 2023) and access to schooling was disrupted for more than 3.5 million
children, leading to setbacks in the education system in terms of interruption in schooling and
learning loses. Without a comprehensive and timely intervention for learning recovery, the
widespread disruption to education will have a long-term impact on Pakistan's human capital.
The ASER 2023 survey cycle marked a significant shift for several reasons. First, the ASER rural
survey adopted a hybrid model for data collection, consisting of both pen and paper-based
personal interviews (PAPI) and computer assisted personal interviews (CAPI). Use of CAPI allowed
for real time reporting and analysis. For this purpose, the ASER mobile data collection application
was developed, through which the survey was conducted in 51 rural districts. The ASER App is
also linked to an interactive dashboard which was used by the ASER team as well as field
coordinators at the district level to monitor data collection, visualize data, and facilitate field
management. An integrated database was also developed so that the data being uploaded
through, both, the PAPI- and CAPI-based surveys can be consolidated, resulting in a single
database through syncing of the two sources. 11,000 volunteers were trained for 3 days across all
provinces by the ASER team for both PAPI- and CAPI-based surveys.
1 h ps://blogs.lse.ac.uk/interna onaldevelopment/2022/12/05/can-pakistan-survive-the-next-75-years-without-strong-human-capital/
2 h ps://www.worldbank.org/en/region/sar/publica on/pakistan -human-capital-review-building-capabili es-throughout-life
3 https://reliefweb.int/report/pakistan/pakistan-educa on-sector-working-group-flood-response-performance-monitoring-dashboard-23-january-2023
4 h ps://blogs.worldbank.org/endpovertyinsouthasia/how-are-children-pakistans-2022-floods-faring
ASER 2023 includes additional questions in sections in the school sheets (government and private) to collect
information on indicators related to school facilities such as: ECE equipment, assistive devices and transport
facility for Children with Disabilities (CWDs), and daycare facility for teachers. Keeping in view the
devastation caused to the school infrastructure due to the floods; the facilities section includes questions
on whether the school was damaged due to any natural disasters, the extent of the damage and any support
received from the gov't or donor. A new section has been added to the school sheets to collect information
on the frequency of teacher training and teacher training needs. Additional items have also been added on
parent-teacher meetings and their frequency. These indicators provide critical inputs on the status of
school effectiveness.
The household sheet also included questions on whether the household members are digitally literate in
terms of use of computer and smartphone. The number of children who had a Birth registration certificate
(B-Form) were also recorded. A section on climate change was included in the household sheet to record
whether the household had been negatively impacted by the floods and to what extent. The questionnaire
also recorded whether children's schooling had been affected due to any natural disaster. Finally, a section
on child health was added for the first time to collect information on whether the child had received the 5
basic vaccines, and whether they had a vaccination card or other record.
Detail of the household indicators as well as those related to school facilities is given below:
Class Observa on
i. Did you observe any ECE equipment? (toys, ac vity material)
Teacher Training
i. Number of teachers who got training(s) recently.
a) None ______
b) Less than 15 days ______
c) 15-30 days ______
d) More than 30 days ______
ii. What were the teacher training sessions based on? (mul ple response)
a) Pedagogy
b) School Leadership
c) Subject Specific Knowledge
d) Curriculum
e) Assessment
f) Community Engagement
g) Classroom Management
h) Educa on and Technology
i) Others
NATIONAL
(RURAL)
49 ASER Pakistan 2023
NATIONAL - RURAL 2023
Facilitated by Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi
Gilgit -
Baltistan
Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa
Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa
AJK
ICT
ICT
KP-
Newly
Merged
Districts
Punjab
Balochistan
30-35
36-40
41-45
46-50
51-55
Above 55
Sindh
Gilgit -
Baltistan
Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa
Khyber
2021
Facilitated by Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi
Pakhtunkhwa
AJK
ICT
ICT
KP-
Newly
Merged
Districts
Punjab
Balochistan
Sindh
Gilgit -
Baltistan
Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa
AJK
ICT
Punjab
Balochistan
Above 30
20-30
10-20
05-10
03-05
0-03
Sindh
Gilgit -
Baltistan
2021
Facilitated by Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi
Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa
AJK
ICT
Punjab
Balochistan
Sindh
Gilgit -
Baltistan
Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa
AJK
ICT
Punjab
Balochistan
Above 15
12-15
09-11
05-08
03-04
0-02
Sindh
Gilgit -
Baltistan
Khyber
2021
Pakhtunkhwa
Facilitated by Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi
AJK
ICT
Punjab
Balochistan
Sindh
Gilgit -
Baltistan
Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa
AJK
ICT
Punjab
Balochistan
01-05
06-10
10-20
20-30
30-40
Above 40
Sindh
Gilgit -
Baltistan
2021
Facilitated by Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi
Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa
AJK
ICT
Punjab
Balochistan
Sindh
Gilgit -
Baltistan
Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa
AJK
ICT
Punjab
Balochistan
Below 33
33-40
40-50
50-60
60-70
Above 70
Sindh
Gilgit -
Baltistan
Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa
2021
Facilitated by Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi AJK
ICT
Punjab
Balochistan
Sindh
Gilgit -
Baltistan
Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa
AJK
ICT
Punjab
Balochistan
Below 33
33-40
40-50
50-60
60-70
Above 70
Sindh
Gilgit -
Baltistan
Khyber
2021
Facilitated by Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi
Pakhtunkhwa
AJK
ICT
Punjab
Balochistan
Sindh
Gilgit -
Baltistan
Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa
AJK
ICT
Punjab
Balochistan
Below 33
33-40
40-50
50-60
60-70
Above 70
Sindh
Gilgit -
Baltistan
Khyber
2021
Facilitated by Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi
Pakhtunkhwa
AJK
ICT
Punjab
Balochistan
Sindh
% Children
60 58 57
14 - 16 60.34 16.81 1.80 0.27 9.13 11.65 100 42 43
40
6 - 16 66.73 16.95 2.14 0.46 8.96 4.75 100 20
Total 86.3 13.7 100 0
Government schools Private schools
By Type 77 20 2 1
40
16
20
% Children
13 13 12 30
12
10 7 7
10 5 4 20
9
0 10 9 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7 10 6
0
Class
2019 2021 2023
2 0 61.7 27.93 18.86 12.57 0 2.5 1.43 0.49 0.31 0.38 0.4 12.57
3 0 49.23 24.36 19.67 13.21 6.08 3.56 1.89 0.85 0.47 0.42 12.98
4 0 44.77 22.11 17.91 11.75 6.5 3.16 2.99 1.55 0.94 12.17
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
% Children
5 6.9 7.9 15.5 19.7 50.0 100
60
6 9.6 4.3 13.6 18.3 54.2 100 44 45 49
43
7 8.3 3.5 10.5 16.3 61.4 100 40
8 8.8 2.5 6.7 13.9 68.2 100 20
9 9.3 2.0 4.3 11.7 72.7 100 0
10 3.4 1.0 2.5 8.0 85.1 100 Class 1: Can read at Class 3: Can read at Class 5: Can read at
least le ers least sentences least story
How to read: 9.5% (5.2+4.3) children of class 1 can read atleast sentence
Children who can read story Urdu/Sindhi Learning level by gender Learning levels: out-of-school (Urdu/Sindhi)
(Urdu/Sindhi) Children (Age 5 to 16 years)
2019 2021 2023 Children (Age 5 to 16 years)
100
100 100
80 80 72
% Children
80
% Children
60
% Children
50 55 50 45 60
60 40
40 33 20 40
17 0
20 20 12
Boys Girls 6 6 4
0 0
Who can read at least sentences
Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 Beginner Le ers Words Sentences Story
Who can read sentences Learning levels by gender English Learning levels: out-of-school English
Children (Age 5-16 years) English Children (Age 5 to 16 years) Children (Age 5 to 16 years)
80 80
100 74
% Children
60
% Children
80 54 49 60
% Children
60 54 40
55 40
40 20
31 20
0 12
20 18 4 5 5
Boys Girls 0
0 Beginner Capital Small Words Sentences
Who can read at least words
Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 le ers le ers
100
1 30.2 34.8 18.3 7.3 4.5 2.0 3.0 100
2 17.2 17.2 27.1 17.4 10.5 4.8 5.8 100 80
% Children
3 11.7 9.3 18.6 22.1 16.6 9.1 12.6 100
60
4 9.8 5.2 12.0 15.8 17.5 15.3 24.4 100 48
34 39 43 35 41
5 3.5 4.9 7.7 9.3 13.9 14.4 46.3 100 40
6 9.3 2.6 5.9 9.5 13.3 12.7 46.7 100 20
7 7.8 2.3 4.2 8.2 10.1 11.9 55.5 100
8 8.4 1.3 3.0 6.0 7.8 10.1 63.4 100 0
Class 1: Can Class 3: Can at Class 5: Can at
9 8.8 1.2 2.4 5.4 5.6 7.9 68.8 100
recognize at least least do least do division
10 3.1 0.6 1.1 3.7 4.1 7.5 79.8 100 numbers (10-99) subtrac on
How to read: 9.5% (4.5+2.0+3.0) children of class 1 can do atleast subtrac on
Children who can do division Learning levels by gender Arithme c Learning levels: out-of-school Arithme c
(Age 5 to 16 years) Children (Age 5 to 16 years) Children (Age 5 to 16 years)
100
% Children
60 60
80 49 45
% Children
40
60 40
47 20
40 46 20 11
20 24 0 4 4 4 4 3
13 Boys Girls 0
0 Beginner Number Subtrac on 2 Division
Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 Who can at least do subtrac on recogni on 10- digits
99
Govt. 4.26 5.01 5.13 6.89 6.95 8.7 9.95 10.2 12.2 13.39 6.85
9.66
Pvt. 22.13 22.82 21.62 21.79 22.4 22.37 20.17 20.48 23.98 22 21.64
Parental educa on
Children a ending paid tui on
Parental Educa on-Atleast Primary
Government schools Private schools
Mothers Fathers 100
100
80
80
% Children
60
55
% Parents
60 56
53
35 35 40
40
32
22 20 22 22
20 20
7 7
0 0
2019 2021 2023 2019 2021 2023
Children a endance 85% 88% 88% 83% 87% 91% 90% 90% 77% 90%
Teacher a endance 88% 90% 92% 83% 89% 85% 86% 77% 84% 84%
19%
7%
5%
Funds/Grants (% Schools)
Government Schools Private Schools
Primary Elementary Secondary Other Primary Elementary Secondary Other
# of schools reported receiving grants 645 204 285 220 28 31 38 21
2022 % of schools reported receiving grants 31% 47% 57% 32% 6% 7% 10% 6%
Average amount of grant (Rs.) 25,463.8 136,526.0 185,705.4 96,867.0 12,809.6 124,676.7 110,390.5 9,785.6
# of schools reported receiving grants 523 130 180 176 4 14 14 10
2023 % of schools reported receiving grants 25% 30% 36% 26% 1% 3% 4% 3%
Average amount of grant (Rs.) 15,290.5 41,093.0 113,572.0 106,728.4 4,686.6 27,274.0 28,200.9 3,747.7
1.24 0.63
0.84 0.90
0.58
0.18 0.19
0.21 0.28 0.14 0.11
0.16 0.14 0.09 0.03 0.02 0.03
0.07 0.00
Primary Elementary Secondary Overall Primary Elementary Secondary Overall
Government School Private School
Visual Disability- Girls (Avg.) in Schools Visual Disability- Girls (Avg.) in Schools
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
1.33
1.18
1.02
0.76 0.80 0.76
0.60 0.61
0.47
0.23 0.28
0.16 0.19 0.14 0.13
0.06 0.05 0.09 0.06
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
Primary Elementary Secondary Overall Primary Elementary Secondary Overall
Government School Private School
*The graphs on disability report findings based on the Washington Short Set which assesses children across six func onings: visual, hearing, physical, intellectual, self-care and communica on with others, by school type, school level and gender.
Hearing Disability- Boys (Avg.) in Schools Hearing Disability- Boys (Avg.) in Schools
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
1.30
0.50
0.46
0.41
0.88 0.37
0.68
0.47 0.22
0.39
0.14 0.12 0.18 0.06 0.04
0.07 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.05 0.03
0.00 0.00 0.00
Hearing Disability- Girls (Avg.) in Schools Hearing Disability- Girls (Avg.) in Schools
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
0.36
0.38
0.34 0.33 0.34
0.24 0.25
0.22
Physical Disability- Girls (Avg.) in Schools Physical Disability- Girls (Avg.) in Schools
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
0.67 0.75
0.63
0.67
0.53
0.47
0.37
0.25 0.28
0.17 0.20 0.23
0.13 0.16
0.13 0.14 0.14
0.09 0.07
0.00 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.03
Intellectual Disability- Boys (Avg.) in Schools Intellectual Disability- Boys (Avg.) in Schools
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
1.80
0.77
0.64
1.15
0.50
0.86
0.72 0.38
0.27
0.36 0.36 0.31 0.15
0.21 0.14 0.08 0.11 0.11
0.11 0.10 0.02 0.02
0.00 0.00
Intellectual Disability- Girls (Avg.) in Schools Intellectual Disability- Girls (Avg.) in Schools
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
0.37
1.00
0.27
0.25
9.14
1.00
0.33 0.29
1.67 0.17
0.39 0.38 0.04 0.19 0.07 0.03 0.07 0.11 0.11 0.11
0.03 0.06
0.00 0.00 0.10 0.03 0.00 0.01
Self Care Disability- Girls (Avg.) in Schools Self Care Disability- Girls (Avg.) in Schools
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
10.00 9.14
0.50
8.00
6.00
0.22 0.20
4.00 0.18
1.67
0.14 0.14 0.13 0.14
2.00 0.07 0.08
0.39 0.38 0.04 0.19 0.07 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.03 0.01 0.00
0.00
Primary Elementary Secondary Overall Primary Elementary Secondary Overall
Government School Private School
Communication Disability- Boys (Avg.) in Schools Communica on Disability- Boys (Avg.) in Schools
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
1.20 1.11
0.60
0.96
1.00
0.74
0.80
0.61 0.34 0.32
0.60 0.26
0.22
0.40 0.28
0.17 0.18 0.11
0.20 0.10 0.12 0.09 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.03
0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00
Primary Elementary Secondary Overall Primary Elementary Secondary Overall
Government School Private School
Communica on Disability- Girls (Avg.) in Schools Communication Disability- Girls (Avg.) in Schools
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
1.20 1.11
0.60
0.96
1.00
0.74
0.80
0.61 0.34 0.32
0.60 0.26
0.22
0.40 0.28
0.17 0.18 0.11
0.20 0.10 0.12 0.09 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.03
0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00
Primary Elementary Secondary Overall Primary Elementary Secondary Overall
Government School Private School
Sample Composition · 60% children of age 3-5 are currently not enrolled in
any early childhood education program/school.
· ASER 2023 survey was conducted in 151 rural
· Of the children enrolled in ECE, 78% are enrolled in
districts of Pakistan. This covered 84,882 households
government schools and 22% are enrolled in non-
in 4,381 villages across the country during
state institutions/private schools.
September-November 2023.
· Detailed information was collected for 212,537
children (55.2% males, 43.9% females and 0.9% THEME 3: CLASS WISE LEARNING LEVELS
transgenders) aged 3-16 years. Out of these 153,354 Learning levels of children are assessed through language
children aged 5-16 years were assessed for language and arithmetic tools. The same tools are used for all
and arithmetic competencies. children between the ages of 5 to 16. The literacy and
numeracy assessments cover up to Class 2 level
· School information was collected for public and non-
competencies mapped to the National Curriculum of
state/private schools. A total of 4,364 government
Pakistan.
schools and 1,654 non-state/private institutions,
including madrassahs and non-formal schools were
surveyed. Urdu/Sindhi Learning levels of class 3 children have
improved and of class 5 children have declined:
THEME 1: ACCESS · 18% of class 3 children could read story in Urdu/Sindhi
compared to 15% in 2021.
Proportion of out-of-school children has decreased
when compared to 2021 (5-16 years). · 50% of class 5 children could read a class 2 level story
· In 2023, 14% of children were reported to be out-of- in Urdu/Sindhi compared to 55% in 2021.
school; a decrease when compared to 2021 (19%).
Around 9% of children have never been enrolled in a English learning levels of class 3 and class 5 children have
school and 5% have dropped out of school for various declined:
reasons.
· 18% of class 3 children could read class 2 level
· 86% of all school-aged children within the age sentences compared to 20% in 2021.
bracket of 6-16 years were enrolled in schools.
Amongst these, 77% (81% in 2021) of children were · 54% of class 5 children could read class 2 level
enrolled in government schools whereas 23% (19% in sentences compared to 56% in 2021.
2021) were going to non-state institutions (20%
private schools and 2% Madrassah and 1% others).
Arithmetic learning levels of class 3 and class 5 children
The share of private schools has increased by 4 have declined:
percentage points compared with 2021, indicating its
return to pre-COVID level. · 13% of children enrolled in class 3 could do two-digit
division compared to 20% in 2021.
· Amongst the enrolled students in government
schools, 42% were girls and 58% were boys whereas · 46% of class 5 children could do two-digit division as
in private schools 57% enrolled students were boys compared to 51% in 2021.
and 43% were girls.
THEME 4: LEARNING LEVELS BY SCHOOL TYPE
THEME 2: EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION (GOVERNMENT VS PRIVATE)
The proportion of children enrolled in ECE has increased
in 2023 as compared to 2021. Children enrolled in private schools are performing better
in literacy and numeracy compared to government
· 40% of all school-aged children in the age bracket of counterparts, with provincial and area variations.
3-5 years were enrolled in ECE compared to 38% in
· 49% children enrolled in class 5 in private schools are
2021.
· According to the public sector Head Teachers, playgrounds as compared to 42% in 2021.
Pedagogy (13%), Curriculum (12%) and School · 88% of surveyed private primary schools had
Leadership (11%) are the key areas of teacher electricity connection as compared to 68% in 2021.
training; followed by Assessment (10%) and Subject · 39% of surveyed private secondary schools had
Specific Knowledge (10%). computer labs and 43% had internet availability.
· In comparison, for the private sector, Curriculum
(16%), Pedagogy (13%) and Assessment (13%) are the THEME 14: SCHOOL GRANTS/FUNDS
key areas for teacher training, followed by Classroom
Management (12%) and School Leadership (11%). A higher share of government schools as compared to
· Whereas, the core teacher training needs identified private schools receive grants in the academic year 2022
by the Head Teachers in public and private schools · 31% government primary schools and 6% private
were Pedagogy (11%), School Leadership (10%), and primary schools received grants in the academic year
Curriculum (10%); followed by Subject Specific 2022.
Knowledge (9%), Assessment (9%), Classroom · 47% government elementary schools and 7% private
Management (9%), and Education & Technology (9%). elementary schools received grants in the academic
year 2022.
THEME 12: PARENT TEACHER MEETINGS · 57% government secondary schools and 10% private
secondary schools received grants in the academic
· 45% of surveyed government schools schedule year 2022.
monthly parent-teacher meetings as compared to
64% of private schools. THEME 15: DISABILITIES & FUNCTIONINGS
THEME 13: SCHOOL FACILITIES GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS: · As part of the school-level survey, data on children
with disabilities (CWDs) was also collected. Head
teachers/teachers were interviewed using the
· 70% of the surveyed government primary schools Washington-UNICEF Short Set of questions, also
have functional toilets as compared to 70% in 2021. known as the Washington Group/UNICEF Module on
· 65% of the surveyed government primary schools Child Functioning, which assesses children against 6
have usable drinking water in contrast to 57% in 2021. functionings i.e., visual, hearing, physical, intellectual,
· 72% of the surveyed government primary schools, self-care and communication with others.
had complete boundary walls as compared to 75% in · At the national level, 11% of the surveyed government
2021. schools and 11% of private schools reported to have
· 48% of surveyed government primary schools had children with disabilities.
playgrounds as compared 46% in 2021.
· 71% of surveyed government primary schools had THEME 16: HOUSEHOLDS' ACCESS TO TECHNOLOGY &
electricity connection as compared to 68% in 2021. KNOWLEDGE OF ITS USAGE
· 51% of surveyed government secondary schools had
computer labs and 43% had internet facilities. · ASER 2023 (rural) included a range of questions at the
household level regarding access to technology and
PRIVATE SCHOOLS: knowledge of its usage.
· 85% of households across all rural districts have
· 89% of the surveyed private primary schools have access to mobile phones and 61% have smart phones.
functional toilets as opposed to 71% in 2021. · Amongst mobile users, 60% use WhatsApp services,
· 82% of the surveyed private primary schools have whilst 69% use (SMS) text messaging.
usable drinking water as compared to 77% in 2021. · 23% have an internet connection and 14% have
· 86% of the surveyed private primary schools had computers. 62% of households have TV and 11% have
complete boundary walls in contrast to 77% in 2021. radio.
· 55% of surveyed private primary schools had · On average, at least 1 household member can use a
THEME 17: HOUSEHOLDS' ACCESS TO SOCIAL SAFETY · 33% of surveyed government schools were reported
NETS & IMPACT ON INCOME AND WELL-BEING to be damaged by a natural disaster as compared to
16% of private schools.
· 25% of the household respondents reported receiving
welfare transfers via BISP; 2% Baitul-Maal; 1% PSPA; · Out of surveyed government schools that were
1% Akhuwat and 8% through other channels. reported to be damaged, 92% were “partially
damaged” while 8% were “fully damaged”.
THEME 18: CLIMATE CHANGE · Out of surveyed private schools that were reported to
be damaged, 97% were “partially damaged” and 3%
· 27% of household respondents reported that they are “fully damaged”.
well “informed” about climate change, whereas a · Of schools that were reported to be damaged, 45%
significant share (73%) indicated that they are Government and 47% private schools received some
“uninformed”. assistance from the government or a donor
· 25% of households were “significantly” impacted by organization.
natural disasters within the last year, while 17% were
“moderately” affected. THEME 19: CHILDREN'S HEALTH
· 8% of household respondents reported that they
suffered losses amounting to more than 50% of their · 52% of children in surveyed households were
earnings due to natural disasters within the last year, reported to have received all the five basic vaccines
whereas 12% indicated that 26%-50% of their (BCG, Polio, DPT-HepB-Hib, Pneumococcal, Measles)
earnings were negatively impacted. while 11% received none of the five basic vaccines.
· 20% households reported that children's schooling
was “extremely affected” by natural disasters/floods,
whereas 9% indicated that it was “moderately
affected”.
· A significant share (23%) of the household
respondents reported that their psychological
wellbeing was “substantially affected” due natural
disasters, while 13% indicated their mental wellbeing
67% 62%
87% 85%
86%
77%
89% 85%
31%
40% 39%
60% 61%
69%
IN SCHOOLS
GOVT PVT
88%
69%
75% 76%
No Yes No Yes
14%
28%
72%
86%
78% 28.07
96.69
Has Your Family been Impacted by Natural Disaster? To What Extent Was Your Income Impacted?
More than 50% btw 11% - 25% btw 26% - 50% Less than 10% No affect
Yes, signficantly Yes, moderately No, not affected
8%
25.47
11%
51% 12%
57.18
17.36
18%
Was Children's Schooling Affected By Natural Disaster? Has Your Psychological Well Being Been Affected Due to Climate Change?
Somewhat affected Moderately Affected Extremely affected Not at all Not at all Substan ally affected Some what affected Affected only a bit
6.91 8.99
8.67
12.97
19.96
55.51
64.46
22.52
IN SCHOOLS
GOVT PVT
School damaged by any natural disaster Extend of the damaged caused by School damaged by any natural disaster Extend of the damaged caused by
natural disaster natural disaster
No Yes No Yes
fully par ally fully par ally
16
8% 3
33%
67%
84
92% 97
Recieved assistance for the recovery of damage Recieved assistance for the recovery of damage
No Yes No Yes
45% 47
Rs Rs
55% 53
% Children that Received None of the Five Basic Vaccines Whether Parent/Guardian Have a Vaccina on Card, Other Document or Both
Have None
34%
11% 66%
Diagnosed With a Health Problem By Doctor or Heathcare Provider Has the Child Received Deworming Pills or Any Other Medicine in School?
No Yes
90 82.89
80 18.11
70
60
50
40
30
20
7.54
10 2.44 4.59
0.68 0.86 1
0 81.89
Epilepsy Blood Type-2 Asthma Heart Allergies Other
disorder Diabetes condi ons
100%
80%
60% 75%
92%
98% 99% 99%
40%
20%
25%
8%
0% 2% 1% 1%
BISP recipient Other recipient Baitul Maal PSPA recipient Akhuwat
recipient recipient
BALOCHISTAN
(RURAL)
BALOCHISTAN - RURAL 2023
Facilitated by Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi
% Children
80 64
14 to 16 55.61 2.67 2.74 0.07 15.53 23.39 100 60 55
45 36
40
6 to 16 67.55 3.36 4.30 0.06 15.83 8.89 100 20
Total 75.27 24.73 100 0
Government schools Private schools
By Type 89.7 4.5 5.7 0.1
40
20
17
% Children
20 15
13 12 30 20
10 7 5 5
3 2 20 18
13
0 10 18
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 10
0
Class
2019 2021 2023
80
5 66.46 3.27 0.17 0.02 30.08 100 60
40
3 to 5 35.15 2.08 0.59 0.02 62.15 100 30
20
Total 37.85 62.15 100 0
Age 3 Age 4 Age 5
By Type 92.9 5.5 1.6 0.1
% Children
5 15.19 1.63 18.1 19.4 45.68 100 60 53
6 22.85 2.42 7.09 21.43 46.22 100 42 42
40
7 24.1 1.35 4.51 11.98 58.05 100 25
20
8 24.85 1.35 4.04 8.81 60.95 100
9 32.58 1.72 2.8 9.68 53.23 100 0
10 12.5 1.69 2.12 12.5 71.19 100 Class 1: Can read at Class 3: Can read at Class 5: Can read at
least letters least sentences least story
How to read: 6.8% (4.3+2.5) children of class 1 can read atleast sentence
Children who can read story Urdu Learning levels by gender Learning levels: out-of-school (Urdu)
(Urdu) Children (Age 5 to 16 years)
2019 2021 2023 Children (Age 5 to 16 years)
100
100 100 80 77
% Children
80
% Children
80 60
60
% Children
60 40 31
46 40 40
48
40 26 20 20 18
0 2 2 2
20 0
15 Boys Girls
Beginner Le ers Words Sentences Story
0
Who can read at least sentences
Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6
Who can read sentences Learning levels by gender English Learning levels: out-of-school English
Children (Age 5-16 years) English Children (Age 5 to 16 years) Children (Age 5 to 16 years)
100
60
% Children
80 40 60
% Children
40 32
60 47 40
31 20
40 24 16
0 20
20 16
Boys Girls 1 2 3
0 0
Who can read at least words Beginner Capital Small letters Words Sentences
Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 letters
100
1 24.69 47.75 15.27 5.23 4.64 1.14 1.27 100
2 19.19 11.1 32.13 20.48 9.79 3.41 3.88 100 80
3 12.8 4.73 15.11 29.09 19.79 6.99 11.48 100
% Children
60
4 16.14 3.19 6.65 11.52 20.89 21.81 19.81 100
42
5 14.47 8.6 4.34 12.18 14.48 20.61 25.3 100 40
30 29 32
6 21.64 2.66 5.56 5.56 13.42 10.13 41.02 100 22 21
20
7 23.85 1.49 3.81 3.62 5.75 6.01 55.46 100
8 23.82 1.47 4.05 4.11 5.95 5.71 54.88 100 0
9 30.46 1.83 4.84 4.74 6.35 4.74 47.04 100 Class 1: Can Class 3: Can at Class 5: Can at
10 10.43 1.06 1.91 3.19 10.21 14.68 58.51 100 recognize at least least do least do division
numbers (10-99) subtrac on
How to read: 7% (4.6+1.1+1.3) children of class 1 can do atleast subtrac on
Children who can do division Learning levels by gender Arithme c Learning levels: out-of-school Arithme c
Children (Age 5 to 16 years) Children (Age 5 to 16 years)
2019 2021 2023
100 100
100 80 80 75
% Children
% Children
80 60 60
% Children
40 38
60 30 40
41
40 29 20 16
20 20
20 0 1 3 1 2 2
11 Boys Girls 0
Beginner Number Subtrac on 2 Division
0
Who can at least do subtrac on recogni on 10- digits
Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 99
Govt. 0.9 1.2 0.8 1.0 1.8 1.0 0.9 2.5 1.8 3.3 1.1
1.3
Pvt. 2.4 6.1 4.8 5.2 6.1 3.9 5.3 1.5 1.1 6.5 4.4
Parental educa on
Children a ending paid tui on
Parental Educa on- atleast primary
Government schools Private schools
Mothers Fathers 100
100 80
80
% Children
60
% Parents
60
43 36 35 40
40
18 12 21 20
20 13 10
1 5 1 4
0 0
2019 2021 2023 2019 2021 2023
Children a endance 81% 82% 86% 75% 83% 89% 90% 93% 90%
Teacher a endance 88% 88% 89% 50% 85% 62% 24% 74% 60%
GRANTS
54%
49% 33%
46% 30%
33% 20%
22% 15%
7%
3% 3%
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Hearing Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Hearing Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
Government School Private School Government School Private School
1.80 1.75 1.00 1.00
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Physical Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Physical Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
3.00
2.00
1.50
1.47 1.50
1.00
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Intellectual Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Intellectual Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
1.30
1.00 1.00
1.00
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Self Care Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Self Care Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
3.67
4.00
2.56
1.00
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Communica on Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Communica on Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
3.10 1.00
1.00
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
*The graphs on disability report findings based on the Washington Short Set which assesses children across six func onings: visual, hearing, physical, intellectual, self-care and communica on with others, by school type and gender.
government school children can do the same. 2021) had Class 2 sitting with other classes.
· 42% of children enrolled in class 5 in private schools · 3% of surveyed government schools (as compared to
were able to do division as compared to 32% class 5 4% in 2021) and 3% of surveyed private schools (35%
children enrolled in government schools. in 2021) had class 8 sitting with other classes.
· There is a marked increase in multigrading in class 2
THEME 5: GENDER GAP and decrease in class 8 across government schools and
non-state institutions/ private schools in Balochistan.
Gender gap in learning: boys outperform girls (age 5-16
overall) in literacy and numeracy skills. THEME 9: TEACHER & STUDENT ATTENDANCE
· 40% of boys and 29% of girls could read at least
sentences in Urdu.
· 35% boys could read at least English words while 28% Student attendance is recorded by taking a headcount of all
of girls can do the same. students present in school on the day of visit.
· 28% of boys were able to do at least subtraction · Overall student attendance in surveyed government
compared to 27% girls. schools was 83% whereas it was 90% in private
schools.
THEME 6: PARENTAL EDUCATION · 19% school teachers in Government Schools and 72%
Private School teachers follow up with parents in case
· 22% mothers (12% in 2021) and 35% fathers (36% in of student absence.
2021) in the sampled households had completed at · Teacher attendance is recorded by referring to the
least primary education. appointed positions in each school and the total
number of teachers present on the day of survey.
THEME 7: PAID TUITIONS · Overall teacher attendance in surveyed government
schools was 85% whereas it was 60% in private
Private tuition incidence is greater for private school schools.
students. Overall, 7% students enrolled in private schools
are attending paid tuition as compared to 1% students THEME 10: TEACHERS' QUALIFICATION
enrolled in government schools (20% in 2021).
· Children across all classes/grades take private tuition. · 38% teachers in surveyed government schools have
In government schools, 1% of children enrolled in class done graduation as compared to 29% teachers in
1 take tuition as compared to 3% children in class 10. private schools.
· In 2021, percentage of government school students · However, 32% have completed M.Ed. in government
availing paid tuition had increased to 13% from 1% in schools compared to 23% in private schools.
2019 due to COVID-19 related school closures. The
decrease in share of government school students THEME 11: CAPACITY BUILDING OF TEACHERS
attending paid tuition by 12% (1% in 2023 compared
to 13% in 2021) reflects the return to pre-pandemic · 10% of public-school teachers and 0% of private
levels. school teachers received training in the preceding 30
days or more from the date of survey.
THEME 8: MULTI-GRADE TEACHING · According to the public sector Head Teachers,
Pedagogy (13%), Curriculum (13%) and School
66% of surveyed government schools and 7% of surveyed Leadership (10%) are the key areas of teacher training;
private schools had Class 2 students sitting with other followed by Assessment (10%), Subject Specific
classes. Knowledge (9%) and Classroom Management (9%).
· Children of Class 2 and Class 8 sitting together with any · In comparison, for the private sector, Curriculum
other classes were observed where one teacher was (16%), Pedagogy (14%) and Assessment (13%) are the
teaching more than one grade. key areas for teacher training, followed by Classroom
· 66% of the surveyed government schools (58% in Management (12%), School Leadership (11%), and
2021) and 7% of the surveyed private schools (32% in Education Technology (11%).
“uninformed”.
· 38% of households were “significantly” impacted by
natural disasters within the last year, while 35% were
“moderately” affected.
· 14% of household respondents reported that they
suffered losses amounting to more than 50% of their
earnings due to natural disasters within the last year,
whereas 24% indicated that 26%-50% of their
earnings were negatively impacted.
· 17% households reported that children's schooling
was “extremely affected” by natural disasters/floods,
whereas 19% indicated that it was “moderately
affected”.
· A significant share (31%) of the household
respondents reported that their psychological
wellbeing was “substantially affected” due natural
disasters, while 24% indicated their mental wellbeing
was “somewhat affected”.
· 56% of surveyed government schools were reported
to be damaged by a natural disaster as compared to
19% of private schools.
· Out of surveyed government schools that were
reported to be damaged, 95% were “partially
damaged” while 5% were “fully damaged”.
· Out of surveyed private schools that were reported to
be damaged, 100% were “partially damaged”.
· Of schools that were reported to be damaged, 66%
Government and 50% private schools received some
assistance from the government or a donor
organization.
THEME 19: CHILDREN'S HEALTH
50% 56%
50% 44%
89% 89%
92%
84% 81%
90%
25%
39% 39%
61% 61%
75%
IN SCHOOLS
GOVT PVT
55% 45%
98%
88%
91%
No Yes No Yes
7% 13%
93% 87%
+
47%
98.57
Has Your Family been Impacted by Natural Disaster? To What Extent Was Your Income Impacted?
More than 50% Less than 10% btw 11% - 25% btw 26% - 50% No affect
Yes, signficantly Yes, moderately No, not affected
14%
25%
27.13
37.78
18%
24%
19%
35.09
Was Children's Schooling Affected By Natural Disaster? Has Your Psychological Well Being Been Affected Due to Climate Change?
Somewhat affected Extremely affected Moderately Affected Not at all Substan ally affected Not at all Some what affected Affected only a bit
11.92
16.64
30.73
16.72
52.51
24.12
18.85
28.51
IN SCHOOLS
GOVT PVT
School damaged by any natural disaster Extend of the damaged caused by School damaged by any natural disaster Extend of the damaged caused by
natural disaster natural disaster
No Yes No Yes
fully par ally fully par ally
19
5% 0
44%
56%
81
100
95%
Recieved assistance for the recovery of damage Recieved assistance for the recovery of damage
No Yes No Yes
34%
Rs 50 Rs 50
66%
% Children that Received None of the Five Basic Vaccines Whether Parent/Guardian Have a Vaccina on Card, Other Document or Both
29%
16%
71%
Diagnosed With a Health Problem By Doctor or Heathcare Provider Has the Child Received Deworming Pills or Any Other Medicine in School?
No Yes
100
89.52 4.14
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10 0.59 1.09 1.65 3.25 3.59
0.31
0
Epilepsy Blood Type-2 Asthma Allergies Heart Other 95.86
disorder Diabetes condi ons
Yes No
100%
80%
69%
60%
95% 100% 100%
40%
20%
31%
0% 5% 0% 0%
BISP recipient Baitul Maal recipient Akhuwat recipient Other recipient
GILGIT
BALTISTAN
(RURAL)
GILGIT BALTISTAN - RURAL 2023
Facilitated by Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi
% Children
55 58
14 - 16 59.3 33.7 1.2 0.2 2.2 3.3 100 60 45 42
40
6 - 16 58.9 33.5 1.1 0.1 4.9 1.5 100
20
Total 93.7 6.3 100 0
Government schools Private schools
By Type 62.9 35.8 1.2 0.1
40
20
% Children
12 11 11 12 11 30
13
10 8 9 7 6
20
0 10 5
4 4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 3 5 2
Class
2018 2019 2023
67
5 30.3 27.8 0.4 0.0 41.5 100 60 49
42
40
3-5 22.6 22.8 1.1 0.1 53.4 100
20
Total 46.6 53.4 100 0
Age 3 Age 4 Age 5
By Type 48.5 48.9 2.4 0.2
1 100 43.45 19.03 7.47 2.79 0 0.65 0.42 0.44 0.33 0.62 1.13 13.38
2 0 56.55 36.5 19.42 7.79 0 0.97 0.76 0.24 0.23 0.41 0.26 11.03
3 0 44.47 30.95 17.05 8.06 2.5 1.84 0.56 0.37 0.14 0.26 10.84
4 0 42.16 31.13 21.38 7.41 3.33 1.36 1.63 0.96 0.61 11.79
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
% Children
61
5 3.5 2.1 7.1 26.9 60.5 100 60 55 53
46
6 3.7 1.7 5.3 16.7 72.7 100
40
7 2.9 0.8 2.8 9.7 83.9 100
8 2.8 0.5 1.1 5.2 90.4 100 20
9 4.5 0.2 0.5 3.0 91.9 100 0
10 1.9 0.4 0.0 2.1 95.7 100 Class 1: Can read at Class 3: Can read at Class 5: Can read at
least letters least sentences least story
How to read: 14.2% (6.6+7.6) children of class 1 can read atleast sentence
Who can read story Urdu Learning levels by gender Learning levels: out-of-school (Urdu)
(Urdu) Children (Age 5 to 16 years)
2019 2021 2021 Children (Age 5 to 16 years)
100
100 100 82
80 80
% Children
80 73 63 62
% Children
60
% Children
60 60
60 40 40
40 20 40
22 0
20 20
Boys Girls 10
0 2 2 3
Who can read at least sentences 0
Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 Beginner Letters Words Sentences Story
Who can read sentences Learning levels by gender English Learning levels: out-of-school English
Children (Age 5-16 years) English Children (Age 5 to 16 years) Children (Age 5 to 16 years)
80 80 78
100 70 68
% Children
77 60
% Children
80 60
66
% Children
60 40
48 40
40 20
27
20 12
20 0
2 4 4
Boys Girls
0 0
Who can read at least words Beginner Capital Small letters Words Sentences
Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 le ers
% Children
62 60 61
4 4.9 3.8 9.0 15.7 12.3 17.9 36.4 100 60 51
5 3.0 1.6 5.9 10.3 9.7 16.6 53.0 100 43 43
40
6 4.2 1.0 3.1 8.1 7.3 13.2 63.0 100
7 3.2 0.3 1.3 5.9 5.0 9.5 74.9 100 20
8 2.4 0.4 0.8 4.7 1.4 8.1 82.3 100 0
9 3.3 0.5 0.3 4.5 1.7 5.4 84.3 100 Class 1: Can Class 3: Can at Class 5: Can at
10 1.9 0.4 0.2 5.6 1.9 3.9 86.2 100 recognize at least least do least do division
numbers (10-99) subtrac on
How to read: 18.4% (6.6+5+6.8) children of class 1 can do atleast subtrac on
Children who can do division Learning levels by gender Arithme c Learning levels: out-of-school Arithme c
(Age 5 to 16 years) Children (Age 5 to 16 years) Children (Age 5 to 16 years)
100
2019 2021 2023 100 81
80
% Children
80
100 60
% Children
59 61
60
80 63 40
% Children
40
60 53 20
20 4 2 2 9
36 0 3
40 0
21 0 Beginner Number Subtrac on Division
20
Boys Girls recognition 2 digits
0 Who can at least do subtrac on 10-99
Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6
Govt. 5.8 8.1 8.6 10.4 8.9 10.6 10.8 11.6 12.1 11.6 9.1
12.8
Pvt. 15.2 24.9 16.5 26.1 20.4 21.4 17.8 17.8 21.2 20.8 18.7
Parental educa on
Children a ending paid tui on
100 80
80
% Children
64 60
62 59
% Parents
60
40
40 35 34 36
21 21 23
20 19
20 9
3
0 0
2019 2021 2023 2019 2021 2023
Primary 48 14 3 65 40 4 5 49
Elementary 38 34 9 81 28 5 1 34
High 24 23 20 67 48 3 1 52
Others 31 29 25 85 46 4 5 55
Total 141 100 57 298 162 16 12 190
Children a endance 86% 84% 86% 94% 86% 86% 89% 76% 53% 81%
Teacher a endance 95% 91% 90% 91% 92% 69% 84% 67% 74%
GRANTS
86%88%
77%
71% 100% 100% 100% 95%
67% 91% 93% 87%
82% 86%
57%
50% 50% 60%
43% 42% 52%
47%
33% 33% 28%
27% 25% 27% 29% 24%
26% 20% 16%
23% 13% 14% 11%
9% 7%
12% 0%
9%
4% Primary Elementary Secondary Other Overall
Primary Elementary Secondary Overall Private Schools
Government Schools
Hearing Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Hearing Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
Government School Private School Government School Private School
1.67
1.50
1.38 1.33 1.25
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.00
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Physical Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Physical Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
3.00
1.50 1.50 1.50
1.33
1.94
1.00 1.00
1.33 1.40
1.00
0.00
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Intellectual Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Intellectual Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
2.13 2.00
1.89
1.33
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Male Female
Self Care Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Self Care Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
1.00 1.00
Male Female
Communica on Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Communica on Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
3.71
1.50
1.33
1.00 1.00 1.00
0.00 0.00
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
*The graphs on disability report findings based on the Washington Short Set which assesses children across six func onings: visual, hearing, physical, intellectual, self-care and communica on with others, by school type and gender.
· 61% of children enrolled in class 5 in private schools 2021) and 24% of the surveyed private schools (24% in
were able to do division as compared to 43% class 5 2021) had Class 2 sitting with other classes.
children enrolled in government schools. · 1% of surveyed government schools (as compared to
8% in 2021) and 6% of surveyed private schools (18%
THEME 5: GENDER GAP in 2021) had class 8 sitting with other classes.
(7%), Curriculum (7%), School Leadership (6%), and private elementary schools received grants in the
Education & Technology (6%). academic year 2022.
· 62% government secondary schools and 9% private
THEME 12: PARENT TEACHER MEETINGS secondary schools received grants in the academic
year 2022.
· 38% of surveyed government schools schedule
THEME 15: DISABILITIES & FUNCTIONINGS
monthly parent-teacher meetings as compared to
56% of private schools. · As part of the school-level survey, data on children
with disabilities (CWDs) was also collected. Head
THEME 13: SCHOOL FACILITIES teachers/teachers were interviewed using the
Washington-UNICEF Short Set of questions, also
GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS: known as the Washington Group/UNICEF Module on
· 53% of the surveyed government primary schools Child Functioning, which assesses children against 6
have functional toilets as compared to 57% in 2021. functionings i.e., visual, hearing, physical, intellectual,
· 65% of the surveyed government primary schools self-care and communication with others.
have clean drinking water available in contrast to 47% · At the provincial level, 27% of the surveyed
in 2021. government schools and 22% of private schools
· 60% of the surveyed government primary schools had reported having children with some disabilities.
complete boundary walls as compared to 63% in THEME 16: HOUSEHOLDS' ACCESS TO TECHNOLOGY &
2021. KNOWLEDGE OF ITS USAGE
· 44% of surveyed government primary schools had
playgrounds as compared to 29% in 2021. · ASER 2023 (rural) included a range of questions at the
· 67% of surveyed government primary schools had household level regarding access to technology and
electricity connection as compared to 67% in 2021. knowledge of its usage.
· 8% of surveyed government secondary schools had · 91% of households across all rural districts have
computer labs and 5% had internet facilities. access to mobile phones and 74% have smart phones.
· Amongst mobile users, 69% use WhatsApp services,
whilst 83% use (SMS) text messaging.
PRIVATE SCHOOLS: · 30% have an internet connection and 23% have
computers. 52% of households have TV and 12% have
· 62% of the surveyed private primary schools have radio.
functional toilets as opposed to 72% in 2021. · On average, at least 2 household members can use a
· 85% of the surveyed private primary schools have smartphone.
clean drinking water available as compared to 75% in
2021.
· 65% of the surveyed private primary schools had THEME 17: HOUSEHOLDS' ACCESS TO SOCIAL SAFETY
complete boundary walls in contrast to 75% in 2021. NETS & IMPACT ON INCOME AND WELL-BEING
· 49% of surveyed private primary schools had
playgrounds as compared to 52% in 2021. · 12% of the household respondents reported receiving
· 72% of surveyed private primary schools had welfare transfers via BISP; 2% Baitul-Maal; and 1%
electricity connection as compared to 67% in 2021. Akhuwat.
· 20% of surveyed private primary schools had
computer labs and 25% had internet availability. THEME 18: CLIMATE CHANGE
THEME 14: SCHOOL GRANTS/FUNDS · 37% of household respondents reported that they are
well “informed” about climate change, whereas a
A higher share of government schools as compared to
significant share (63%) indicated that they are
private schools received grants in the academic year 2022
“uninformed”.
· 38% of government primary schools and 6% private
primary schools received grants in the academic year · 24% of households were “significantly” impacted by
2022. natural disasters within the last year, while 8% were
· 57% of government elementary schools and 18% “moderately” affected.
52%
64%
90% 97%
77%
70%
88% 91%
69%
74%
83%
IN SCHOOLS
GOVT PVT
74%
77% 76%
79%
No Yes No Yes
12%
28%
72%
88%
27.58
+ 36.95
35.47
95% 97.29
Has Your Family been Impacted by Natural Disaster? To What Extent Was Your Income Impacted?
More than 50% btw 11% - 25% btw 26% - 50% Less than 10% No affect
Yes, signficantly Yes, moderately No, not affected
3%
5%
24.28 7%
23%
8.01 62%
67.71
Was Children's Schooling Affected By Natural Disaster? Has Your Psychological Well Being Been Affected Due to Climate Change?
Moderately Affected Somewhat affected Extremely affected Not at all Not at all Substan ally affected Some what affected Affected only a bit
1.14 4.81
1.42
6.99
27.06
25.76
62.44
70.39
IN SCHOOLS
GOVT PVT
School damaged by any natural disaster Extend of the damaged caused by School damaged by any natural disaster Extend of the damaged caused by
natural disaster natural disaster
No Yes No Yes
fully par ally fully par ally
24
25% 3% 2
75% 76
98
97%
Recieved assistance for the recovery of damage Recieved assistance for the recovery of damage
No Yes No Yes
35
48% Rs 52% Rs
65
% Children that Received None of the Five Basic Vaccines Whether Parent/Guardian Have a Vaccina on Card, Other Document or Both
6% 65%
Diagnosed With a Health Problem By Doctor or Heathcare Provider Has the Child Received Deworming Pills or Any Other Medicine in School?
No Yes
90
79.71
80 17.39
70
60
50
40
30
20
10 6.81 8.69
0.84 3.29
0.17 0.48
0 82.61
Epilepsy Blood Type-2 Asthma Allergies Heart Other
disorder Diabetes condi ons
Yes No
100%
80%
60%
88%
98% 99% 100%
40%
20%
12%
0% 2% 1% 0%
BISP recipient Baitul Maal recipient Akhuwat recipient Other recipient
KHYBER
PAKHTUNKHWA
(RURAL)
KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA - RURAL 2023
Facilitated by Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi
% Children
60 58 57
14 - 16 63.1 16.1 2.4 0.2 9.1 9.2 100 42 43
40
6 - 16 67.9 19.3 2.1 0.4 7.2 3.1 100
20
Total 89.7 10.3 100 0
Government schools Private schools
By Type 75.8 21.5 2.3 0.5
40
13 13
20
% Children
14 13
12 30
10 7 8
10 6 13
4 20
0 8
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 14 6
7 4
0
Class
2019 2021 2023
1 100 24.19 13.12 4.97 2.28 0 0.67 0.5 0.12 0.35 0.81 2.03 14.14
2 0 75.81 19.08 13.32 6.31 0 1.21 0.69 0.4 0.06 0.12 0.38 12.35
3 0 67.79 20.03 13.98 6.23 3.36 1.8 1.19 0.71 0.58 0.38 13.25
4 0 61.68 20.88 14.07 5.7 3.75 1.82 1.24 2.2 0.89 13.22
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
% Children
5 0.0 8.7 26.2 20.9 44.2 100
60
6 6.9 7.0 25.5 21.3 39.4 100 40
40 36
7 4.6 6.0 21.2 26.0 42.2 100 28 28
8 6.1 4.1 14.5 23.3 52.0 100 20
9 5.6 4.1 10.1 23.1 57.2 100 0
10 3.0 1.3 4.4 17.8 73.4 100 Class 1: Can read at Class 3: Can read at Class 5: Can read at
least letters least sentences least story
How to read: 7.4% (4.0+3.4) children of class 1 can read atleast sentence
Children who can read story Urdu Learning levels by gender Learning levels: out-of-school children (Urdu)
(Urdu) Children (Age 5 to 16 years)
2019 2021 2023 Children (Age 5 to 16 years) 100
100 80
100 68
% Children
80
% Children
80 60
60
% Children
44 49
60 40 37 40
29 38 20
40 20
0 11 11
5 4
20 0
17 Boys Girls
0 Beginner Le ers Words Sentences Story
Who can read at least sentences
Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6
Children who can read sentences Learning levels by gender English Learning levels: out-of-school English
Children (Age 5-16 years) Children (Age 5 to 16 years) Children (Age 5 to 16 years)
80 80
100
69
% Children
60 60
% Children
80 48 60
% Children
48 40
60
40
31 42 20
40
20
20 0 7 9 10
20 5
Boys Girls
0 0
Who can read at least words Beginner Capital Small letters Words Sentences
Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 letters
100
1 27.1 35.2 21.1 7.9 4.8 1.0 2.9 100
2 14.4 26.7 26.3 13.9 9.4 4.4 4.9 100 80
3 10.7 17.3 25.3 16.8 10.9 5.5 13.5 100
% Children
60
4 5.5 6.9 18.7 20.8 15.2 7.3 25.6 100
35 42 34 35
5 0.0 0.0 10.2 8.9 20.2 11.5 49.2 100 40 37
6 3.6 3.5 7.1 15.5 20.6 16.1 33.7 100 21
20
7 1.6 2.7 6.2 12.2 22.8 18.6 35.9 100
8 2.3 2.1 4.2 7.9 16.7 16.0 50.9 100 0
9 1.6 1.9 3.6 7.0 12.2 16.5 57.2 100 Class 1: Can Class 3: Can at Class 5: Can at
10 2.1 1.0 2.3 4.1 7.2 15.9 67.6 100 recognize at least least do least do division
numbers (10-99) subtrac on
How to read: 8.7 % (4.8+1.0+2.9) children of class 1 can do subtrac on
Children who can do division Learning levels by gender Arithme c Learning levels: out-of-school Arithme c
(Age 5 to 16 years) Children (Age 5 to 16 years) Children (Age 5 to 16 years)
100 100
2018 2019 2021
80 80
65
% Children
100
% Children
53 60
60
80
41 40
% Children
40
60
49 20 20 9
40 33 6 7 5 4 4
25 0
0
20 Beginner Number Subtraction 2 Division
13 Boys Girls recogni on 10- digits
0 99
Who can at least do subtrac on
Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6
Govt. 3.1 2.8 3.8 4.7 3.7 4.0 4.1 4.8 5.6 3.5 4.0
6.7
Pvt. 17.4 16.6 19.4 17.5 17.6 17.7 16.2 16.8 21.0 12.6 18.3
Parental educa on
Children a ending paid tui on
100 80
80
% Children
60
60 56
% Parents
60 57
40
40 32
25 22 21 18
20 14 17
20
3 4
0 0
2019 2021 2023 2019 2021 2023
Children a endance 90% 85% 91% 88% 90% 93% 91% 93% 99% 93%
Teacher a endance 86% 91% 90% 88% 88% 91% 95% 75% 91%
GRANTS
84%
78% 88% 89%
80% 79%
57% 63% 63%
50%
44%
33% 33% 38% 39%
26% 16%
31%
22% 26%30% 23%28%
22% 19%
14% 15% 13%
9% 10% 10% 7% 8% 5%
6% 3% 3% 5%
4% 0%
Primary Elementary Secondary Other Overall
Primary Elementary Secondary Overall
Government Schools Private Schools
20%
9% 13%
5% 4%
2%
Boundary Toilets Playground Water Boundary Wall Toilets Playground Water
Class 2 Class 8 Wall 2021
2023
1.23
1.10 0.76
0.44
0.41
0.27 0.20 0.17
0.14 0.08
0.04
0.00
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Hearing Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Hearing Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
Government School Private School Government School Private School
0.38
0.66
0.47
0.18 0.18
0.19
0.12 0.07
0.04
0.01 0.01 0.01
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Physical Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Physical Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
0.51
0.98
0.78
0.52
0.22
0.29 0.23 0.14 0.14
0.10
0.04 0.00
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Intellectual Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Intellectual Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
0.64 0.28
0.24
0.49
0.11
0.19
0.15
0.08 0.04 0.04
0.01 0.00
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Self Care Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Self Care Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
0.31 0.26
0.27
0.18
0.10 0.08
0.04 0.04
0.01 0.01 0.01
0.00
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Communica on Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Communica on Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
0.58 0.21
0.14
0.33
0.10
0.16 0.06
0.10
0.05
0.01 0.00 0.00
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
*The graphs on disability report findings based on the Washington Short Set which assesses children across six func onings: visual, hearing, physical, intellectual, self-care and communica on with others, by school type and gender.
can read at least sentences in English whereas only teaching more than one grade.
35% private school children can do the same. · 23% of the surveyed government schools (26% in
· 35% of children enrolled in class 5 in government 2021) and 9% of the surveyed private schools (13% in
schools were able to do division as compared to 21% 2021) had Class 2 sitting with other classes.
class 5 children enrolled in private schools. · 5% of surveyed government schools (as compared to
3% in 2021) and 2% of surveyed private schools (14% in
THEME 5: GENDER GAP 2021) had class 8 sitting with other classes.
· There is a marked decrease in multigrading in class 2
Gender gap in learning: boys outperform girls (age 5-16 and class 8 across government and non-state
overall) in literacy and numeracy skills.
institutions/private schools.
· 49% of boys and 37% of girls could read at least THEME 9: TEACHER & STUDENT ATTENDANCE
sentences in Urdu.
· 60% boys could read at least English words while 48% Student attendance is recorded by taking a headcount of all
of girls can do the same. students present in school on the day of visit.
· 53% of boys were able to do at least subtraction · Overall student attendance in surveyed government
compared to 41% girls. schools was 90% whereas it was 93% in private
schools.
THEME 6: PARENTAL EDUCATION · 72% school teachers in Government Schools and 69%
Private School teachers follow up with parents in case
· 22% mothers (25% in 2021) and 26% fathers (60% in of student absence.
2021) in the sampled households had completed at · Teacher attendance is recorded by referring to the
least primary education. appointed positions in each school and the total
number of teachers present on the day of survey.
THEME 7: PAID TUITIONS · Overall teacher attendance in surveyed government
schools was 88% whereas it was 92% in private
Private tuition incidence is greater for private school schools.
students. Overall, 20% students enrolled in private schools
are attending paid tuition as compared to 4% students THEME 10: TEACHERS' QUALIFICATION
enrolled in government schools (14% in 2021).
· 28% teachers in surveyed government schools have
· Children across all classes/grades take private tuition. done graduation as compared to 34% teachers in
In government schools, 3% of children enrolled in class private schools.
1 take tuition as compared to 4% children in class 10. · However, 60% have completed M.Ed. in government
· In 2021, percentage of government school students schools compared to 49% in private schools.
availing paid tuition had increased to 14% from 3% in
2019 due to school closures. The decrease in share of THEME 11: CAPACITY BUILDING OF TEACHERS
government school students attending paid tuition by
10% (4% in 2023 compared to 14% in 2021) reflects the · 58% of public-school teachers and 72% of private
return to pre-pandemic levels. school teachers received training in the preceding
30 days or more from the date of survey.
THEME 8: MULTI-GRADE TEACHING · According to the public sector Head Teachers,
Curriculum (15%), Pedagogy (14%), and Assessment
23% of surveyed government schools and 9% of surveyed (12%), are the key areas of teacher training;
private schools had Class 2 students sitting with other followed by School Leadership (11%), Subject
classes. Specific Knowledge (10%), and Classroom
Management (10%).
· Children of Class 2 and Class 8 sitting together with any · In comparison, for the private sector, Curriculum
other classes were observed with one teacher (16%), Pedagogy (14%) and Assessment (13%) are
the key areas for teacher training, followed by THEME 14: SCHOOL GRANTS/FUNDS
Classroom Management (12%), School Leadership
(11%), Subject Specific Knowledge (10%), and A higher share of government schools as compared to
Education and Technology (10%). private schools received grants in the academic year 2022
· Whereas, the core teacher training needs identified
by the Head Teachers in public and private schools · 42% government primary schools and 3% private
primary schools received grants in the academic year
were Pedagogy (11%), Curriculum (11%), 2022.
Assessment (10%), and Education & Technology · 39% government elementary schools and 4% private
(10%); followed by Subject Specific Knowledge (9%), elementary schools received grants in the academic
School Leadership (9%), and Classroom year 2022.
Management (9%). · 27% government secondary schools and 7% private
secondary schools received grants in the academic
year 2022.
THEME 12: PARENT TEACHER MEETINGS
THEME 15: DISABILITIES & FUNCTIONINGS
· 73% of surveyed government schools schedule
monthly parent-teacher meetings as compared to · As part of the school-level survey, data on children
63% of private schools. with disabilities (CWDs) was also collected. Head
teachers/teachers were interviewed using the
THEME 13: SCHOOL FACILITIES Washington-UNICEF Short Set of questions, also
known as the Washington Group/UNICEF Module on
GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS: Child Functioning, which assesses children against 6
functionings i.e., visual, hearing, physical, intellectual,
self-care and communication with others.
· 90% of the surveyed government primary schools · At the national level, 14% of the surveyed government
have functional toilets as compared to 94% in 2021. schools and 12% of private schools reported to have
· 82% of the surveyed government primary schools children with disabilities.
have usable drinking water in contrast to 83% in
2021. THEME 16: HOUSEHOLDS' ACCESS TO TECHNOLOGY &
· 94% of the surveyed government primary schools, KNOWLEDGE OF ITS USAGE
had complete boundary walls as compared to 91% in
· ASER 2023 (rural) included a range of questions at the
2021. household level regarding access to technology and
· 44% of surveyed government primary schools had knowledge of its usage.
playgrounds as compared 43% in 2021. · 84% of households across all rural districts have
· 83% of surveyed government primary schools had access to mobile phones and 66% have smart phones.
electricity connection as compared to 80% in 2021. · Amongst mobile users, 63% use WhatsApp services,
· 33% of surveyed government secondary schools had whilst 66% use (SMS) text messaging.
computer labs and 26% had internet facilities. · 25% have an internet connection and 15% have
computers. 44% of households have TV and 11% have
PRIVATE SCHOOLS: radio.
· On average, at least 1 household member can use a
smartphone.
· 96% of the surveyed private primary schools have
functional toilets as opposed to 36% in 2021.
· 83% of the surveyed private primary schools have THEME 17: HOUSEHOLDS' ACCESS TO SOCIAL SAFETY NETS
usable drinking water as compared to 86% in 2021. & IMPACT ON INCOME AND WELL-BEING
· 98% of the surveyed private primary schools had
complete boundary walls in contrast to 13% in 2021. · 24% of the household respondents reported receiving
· 54% of surveyed private primary schools had welfare transfers via BISP; 9% Baitul-Maal; and 2%
playgrounds as compared to 3% in 2021. Akhuwat.
· 93% of surveyed private primary schools had
electricity connection as compared to 80% in 2021.
· 38% of surveyed private secondary schools had THEME 18: CLIMATE CHANGE
computer labs and 44% had internet availability. · 24% of household respondents reported that they are
86%
71%
89% 87%
85%
75%
89% 84%
34%
34%
37%
63%
66%
66%
IN SCHOOLS
GOVT PVT
52%
97% 62%
77%
No Yes No Yes
5%
28%
72%
95%
36.84
92% 97.79
Has Your Family been Impacted by Natural Disaster? To What Extent Was Your Income Impacted?
More than 50% btw 26% - 50% btw 11% - 25% Less than 10% No affect
Yes, signficantly Yes, moderately No, not affected
3%
12.06 4%
5%
7.17
13%
75%
80.77
Was Children's Schooling Affected By Natural Disaster? Has Your Psychological Well Being Been Affected Due to Climate Change?
Moderately Affected Somewhat affected Extremely affected Not at all Not at all Substan ally affected Some what affected Affected only a bit
3.18 6.22
5.52
7.09
12.61
11.04
78.69 75.66
IN SCHOOLS
GOVT PVT
School damaged by any natural disaster Extend of the damaged caused by School damaged by any natural disaster Extend of the damaged caused by
natural disaster natural disaster
No Yes No Yes
fully par ally fully par ally
9
16% 11% 6
84% 91 94
89%
Recieved assistance for the recovery of damage Recieved assistance for the recovery of damage
No Yes No Yes
14
31%
Rs Rs
69%
86
% Children that Received None of the Five Basic Vaccines Whether Parent/Guardian Have a Vaccina on Card, Other Document or Both
29%
11%
71%
Diagnosed With a Health Problem By Doctor or Heathcare Provider Has the Child Received Deworming Pills or Any Other Medicine in School?
No Yes
70 64.38
60
50
36.9
40
30
17.98
20
63.1
10 4.93 6.01
2.09 2.21 2.42
0
Type-2 Blood Epilepsy Heart Asthma Allergies Other
Diabetes disorder condi ons
100%
80%
60% 76%
91%
98% 100%
40%
20%
24%
9%
0% 2% 0%
BISP recipient Baitul Maal recipient Akhuwat recipient Other recipient
PUNJAB
(RURAL)
PUNJAB - RURAL 2023
Facilitated by Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi
% Children
11 - 13 68.4 23.9 1.3 0.4 2.6 3.3 100 60 53 53
47 47
14 - 16 64.9 19.2 1.6 0.4 4.4 9.4 100 40
6 - 16 65.3 25.7 1.3 0.6 3.5 3.6 100 20
40
20
% Children
11 11 12 13 12 30
14
10 8 8 6 6
20
0 10 6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5 3
5 8 4
Class 0
2019 2021 2023
60 53
5 49.8 29.2 0.1 0.5 20.4 100
40
3 to 5 25.6 15.6 0.2 0.3 58.3 100 20
20
Total 41.7 58.3 100 0
Age 3 Age 4 Age 5
By Type 61.5 37.4 0.4 0.8
1 100 43.45 19.03 7.47 2.79 0 0.65 0.42 0.44 0.33 0.62 1.13 13.38
2 56.55 36.5 19.42 7.79 0 0.97 0.76 0.24 0.23 0.41 0.26 11.03
3 44.47 30.95 17.05 8.06 2.5 1.84 0.56 0.37 0.14 0.26 10.84
4 42.16 31.13 21.38 7.41 3.33 1.36 1.63 0.96 0.61 11.79
% Children
5 0.0 3.5 14.2 17.2 65.1 100 51 59 61
60
6 4.6 2.1 8.7 15.1 69.6 100 47
7 3.5 2.2 6.7 14.4 73.3 100 40
8 2.9 1.6 3.8 11.6 80.2 100 20
9 3.9 1.2 1.9 7.6 85.5 100 0
10 1.6 0.6 1.7 3.6 92.4 100 Class 1: Can read at Class 3: Can read at Class 5: Can read at
least letters least sentences least story
How to read: 17.2% (7.8+9.4) children of class 1 can read atleast sentence
Children who can read story Urdu Learning levels by gender Learning levels: out-of-school children (Urdu) 5
(Urdu) to 16 years
2019 2021 2023 Children (Age 5 to 16 years)
100
100 100 80
% Children
65 70 80 59
% Children
80 62 63 60
% Children
60 40
60
47 40 20 10 16
40 8 8
20 0
26
20 0
0 Boys Girls
Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 Who can read at least sentences
Class-wise % children who can read Learning levels by school type English
Children who can read English sentences Learning levels by gender English 5 to Learning levels: out-of-school children English 5 to
16 years 16 years
2019 2021 2023
100 100
100
80 80
67 70 65 65
% Children
80 60 59
% Children
60
% Children
60 40
41 40
40 20
24 20 17
20 0 8 6 10
Boys Girls 0
0 Beginner Capital Small Words Sentences
Who can read at least words
Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 le ers letters
100
1 25.9 23.3 26.4 9.2 4.2 4.2 6.8 100
2 13.6 13.5 26.3 19.2 11.5 6.2 9.7 100 80
3 7.3 8.7 21.3 18.2 14.8 11.7 18.0 100
% Children
60 56
4 6.0 4.1 12.6 15.7 13.5 14.8 33.5 100 50 52
46 44 47
5 2.3 1.6 4.1 10.1 11.1 10.0 60.5 100 40
6 4.5 1.3 5.9 9.2 9.7 9.5 60.0 100
20
7 2.8 1.3 3.8 8.8 7.8 10.1 65.3 100
8 3.2 0.7 2.1 6.5 5.9 7.7 74.1 100 0
9 3.8 0.7 1.6 5.5 4.1 4.9 79.3 100 Class 1: Can Class 3: Can at Class 5: Can at
10 1.8 0.4 0.2 3.4 2.8 4.0 87.4 100 recognize at least least do least do division
numbers (10-99) subtrac on
How to read: 15.2% (4.2+4.2+6.8) children of class 1 can do atleast subtrac on
Children who can do division Learning levels by gender Arithme c Learning levels: out-of-school children
Children (Age 5 to 16 years) Children (Age 5 to 16 years) Arithme c
58 60
% Children
60 60 56
80
% Children
60 40
60 40
61 20
40 33 20 13
0 5 6 7 6 6
20 18 0
Boys Girls
Beginner Number Subtraction 2 Division
0
Who can at least do subtrac on recognition 10- digits
Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 99
Govt. 15.1 16.5 16.0 18.5 18.8 20.9 24.4 24.5 26.2 28.7 20.1
22.9
Pvt. 34.0 32.5 31.6 31.2 32.3 31.6 31.3 33.1 37.0 30.3 32.7
Parental educa on
Children a ending paid tui on
100
80
80 72
% Children
66 60
62 61
% Parents
60 55
50 38
40 32 33
40 30
19 20
20 20
0 0
2019 2021 2023 2019 2021 2023
Children a endance 90% 92% 91% 87% 91% 89% 91% 92% 94% 91%
Teacher a endance 85% 91% 93% 94% 89% 88% 81% 82% 85%
GRANTS
99%
94% 94% 93%
92% 93% 87% 86%
85% 83%
79% 73%
19% 56%
18%
8%
26%
4% 12%
3%
Boundary Toilets Playground Water Boundary Wall Toilets Playground Water
Class 2 Class 8 Wall
2023 2021
0.67
0.98
0.72
0.24
0.06 0.16
0.05 0.10
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Hearing Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Hearing Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
Government School Private School Government School Private School
0.44
0.30
0.24 0.21
0.14
0.05 0.06
0.03
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Physical Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Physical Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
0.59
0.77
0.49
0.28
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Intellectual Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Intellectual Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
0.75
0.86
0.27 0.31
0.17
0.15
0.05 0.03
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Self Care Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Self Care Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
1.27 0.43
0.27
0.36
0.17
0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03
0.00 0.00 0.00
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Communica on Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Communication Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
0.92 0.66
0.43
0.48
0.29
0.15
0.12
0.07 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
*The graphs on disability report findings based on the Washington Short Set which assesses children across six func onings: visual, hearing, physical, intellectual, self-care and communica on with others, by school type and gender.
Sample Composition · 58% children of age 3-5 are currently not enrolled in
any early childhood education program/school.
· ASER 2023 survey was conducted in 35 rural districts
· Of the children enrolled in ECE, 61% are enrolled in
of Punjab. The survey covered 20,565 households in
government schools and 39% are enrolled in non-state
996 villages across the country during September-
institutions/private schools.
November 2023.
· Detailed information was collected for 41,582 children
THEME 3: CLASS WISE LEARNING LEVELS
(51.9% males, 46.7% females and 1.4% transgenders)
aged 3-16 years. Out of these 32,803 children aged 5-
Learning levels of children are assessed through language
16 years were assessed for language and arithmetic
and arithmetic tools. The same tools are used for all children
competencies.
between the ages of 5 to 16. The literacy and numeracy
· School information was collected for public and non-
assessments cover up to Class 2 level competencies mapped
state/private schools. A total of 1001 government
to the National Curriculum of Pakistan.
schools and 528 non-state/private institutions,
including madrassahs and non-formal schools were
surveyed. Urdu Learning levels of class 3 improved and class 5
children have declined:
THEME 1: ACCESS
· 26% of class 3 children could read story in Urdu
Proportion of out-of-school children has decreased when compared to 22% in 2021.
compared to 2021 (5-16 years). · 65% of class 5 children could read a class 2 level story
in Urdu compared to 68% in 2021.
· In 2023, 7% of children were reported to be out-of-
school; a decrease when compared to 2021 (14%). English learning levels of class 3 remained same and class 5
Around 4% of children have never been enrolled in a children have declined:
school and 4% have dropped out of school for various
reasons. · 24% of class 3 children could read class 2 level
· 93% of all school-aged children within the age bracket sentences compared to 24% in 2021.
of 6-16 years were enrolled in schools. Amongst these, · 67% of class 5 children could read class 2 level
70% (77% in 2021) of children were enrolled in sentences compared to 73% in 2021.
government schools whereas 30% (23% in 2021) were
going to non-state institutions (28% private schools Arithmetic learning levels of class 3 and class 5 children
and 1% Madrassah and 1% others). The share of have declined:
private schools has increased by 7 percentage points
compared with 2021, indicating its return to pre- · 18% of children enrolled in class 3 could do two-digit
COVID level. division compared to 24% in 2021.
· Amongst the enrolled students in government · 61% of class 5 children could do two-digit division as
schools, 47% were girls and 53% were boys whereas in compared to 69% in 2021.
private schools 53% enrolled students were boys and
47% were girls. T H E M E 4 : L EA R N I N G L E V E L S BY S C H O O L T Y P E
(GOVERNMENT VS PRIVATE)
THEME 2: EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION
The proportion of children enrolled in ECE has decreased in Children enrolled in private schools are performing better
2023 as compared to 2021. in literacy and numeracy compared to government
counterparts.
· 42% of all school-aged children in the age bracket of 3- · 61% children enrolled in class 5 in private schools are
5 years were enrolled in ECE compared to 43% in able to read at least a story in Urdu as compared to
2021.
59% class 5 children enrolled in government schools. · 18% of the surveyed government schools (28% in
· 60% of class 5 children enrolled in private schools can 2021) and 19% of the surveyed private schools (25% in
read at least sentences in English whereas only 56% 2021) had Class 2 sitting with other classes.
government school children can do the same. · 4% of surveyed government schools (as compared to
· 52% of children enrolled in class 5 in private schools 8% in 2021) and 8% of surveyed private schools (20%
were able to do division as compared to 47% class 5 in 2021) had class 8 sitting with other classes.
children enrolled in government schools. · There is a marked decrease in multigrading in class 2
and class 8 across government and non-state
THEME 5: GENDER GAP
Gender gap in learning: girls outperform boys (age 5-16 institutions/private schools.
overall) in literacy and numeracy skills:
THEME 9: TEACHER & STUDENT ATTENDANCE
· 62% of boys and 63% of girls could read at least Student attendance is recorded by taking a headcount of all
sentences in Urdu. students present in school on the day of visit.
· 65% boys could read at least English words while 65% · Overall student attendance in both surveyed
of girls can do the same. government and private schools was 91%.
· 58% of boys were able to do at least subtraction · 59% school teachers in Government Schools and 64%
compared to 60% girls. Private School teachers follow up with parents in case
of student absence.
THEME 6: PARENTAL EDUCATION · Teacher attendance is recorded by referring to the
appointed positions in each school and the total
· 38% mothers (55% in 2021) and 43% fathers (66% in number of teachers present on the day of survey.
2021) in the sampled households had completed at · Overall teacher attendance in surveyed government
least primary education. schools was 89% whereas it was 85.3% in private
schools.
THEME 7: PAID TUITIONS
THEME 10: TEACHERS' QUALIFICATION
Private tuition incidence is greater for private school
students. Overall, 33% students enrolled in private schools
are attending paid tuition as compared to 20% students · 25% teachers in surveyed government schools have
enrolled in government schools (30% in 2021). done graduation as compared to 40% teachers in
private schools.
· However, 62% have completed M.Ed. in government
· Children across all classes/grades take private tuition.
In government schools, 15% of children enrolled in schools compared to 32% in private schools.
class 1 take tuition as compared to 29% children in
class 10. THEME 11: CAPACITY BUILDING OF TEACHERS
· In 2021, percentage of government school students
availing paid tuition had increased to 30% from 19% in · 47% of public-school teachers and 43% of private
2019 due to school closures. The decrease in share of school teachers received training in the preceding 30
government school students attending paid tuition by days or more from the date of survey.
10% (20% in 2023 compared to 30% in 2021) reflects · According to the public sector Head Teachers,
the return to pre-pandemic levels. Pedagogy (14%), Curriculum (15%), Assessment (12%)
and School Leadership (11%) are the key areas of
THEME 8: MULTI-GRADE TEACHING teacher training; followed by Classroom management
18% of surveyed government schools and 19% of surveyed
(11%), Subject Specific Knowledge (11%) and
private schools had Class 2 students sitting with other
Education and technology (9%).
classes.
· In comparison, for the private sector, Curriculum
· Children of Class 2 and Class 8 sitting together with any (16%), Pedagogy (13%) and Assessment (13%) are the
other classes were observed with one teacher key areas for teacher training, followed by Classroom
teaching more than one grade. Management (12%) and School Leadership (11%).
· Whereas, the core teacher training needs identified THEME 14: SCHOOL GRANTS/FUNDS
by the Head Teachers in public and private schools
were Curriculum (13%), Pedagogy (13%), Assessment A higher share of government schools as compared to
(11%), School Leadership (11%), Classroom private schools receive grants in the academic year 2022
management (10%), Education and technology (10%)
Data Literacy (10%) and Subject Specific Knowledge · 67% government primary schools and 16% private
(10%). primary schools received grants in the academic year
2022.
THEME 12: PARENT TEACHER MEETINGS · 75% government elementary schools and 10% private
elementary schools received grants in the academic
· 60% of surveyed government schools schedule year 2022.
monthly parent-teacher meetings as compared to · 78% government secondary schools and 15% private
secondary schools received grants in the academic
74% of private schools.
year 2022.
THEME 13: SCHOOL FACILITIES
THEME 15: DISABILITIES & FUNCTIONINGS
GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS:
· In ASER 2023, as part of the school-level survey, a
"Health and Disability" section. Head
· 92% of the surveyed government primary schools
teachers/teachers were interviewed using the
have functional toilets as compared to 99% in 2021. Washington-UNICEF Short Set of questions, also
· 83% of the surveyed government primary schools known as the Washington Group/UNICEF Module on
have usable drinking water in contrast to 87% in 2021. Child Functioning, which assesses children against 6
· 94% of the surveyed government primary schools, functionings i.e., visual, hearing, physical, intellectual,
had complete boundary walls as compared to 93% in self-care and communication with others.
2021. · In Punjab level, 9% of the surveyed government
· 79% of surveyed government primary schools had schools and 5% of private schools reported to have
playgrounds as compared 73% in 2021. children with disabilities.
· 94% of surveyed government primary schools had
electricity connection as compared to 96% in 2021. THEME 16: HOUSEHOLDS' ACCESS TO TECHNOLOGY &
· 74% of surveyed government secondary schools had KNOWLEDGE OF ITS USAGE
computer labs and 69% had internet facilities.
· ASER 2023 (rural) included a range of questions at the
PRIVATE SCHOOLS: household level regarding access to technology and
knowledge of its usage.
· 93% of the surveyed private primary schools have · 87% of households across all rural districts have access
functional toilets as opposed to 26% in 2021. to mobile phones and 70% have smart phones.
· 83% of the surveyed private primary schools have · Amongst mobile users, 72% use WhatsApp services,
usable drinking water as compared to 86% in 2021. whilst 73% use (SMS) text messaging.
· 94% of the surveyed private primary schools had · 31% have an internet connection and 21% have
complete boundary walls in contrast to 12% in 2021. computers. 75% of households have TV and 9% have
· 56% of surveyed private primary schools had radio.
playgrounds as compared to 3% in 2021. · On average, at least 1 household member can use a
· 89% of surveyed private primary schools had smartphone.
electricity connection as compared to 82% in 2021.
· 30% of surveyed private secondary schools had THEME 17: HOUSEHOLDS' ACCESS TO SOCIAL SAFETY NETS
computer labs and 36% had internet availability. & IMPACT ON INCOME AND WELL-BEING
Availability of a func onal toilet Availability of Electrcity connection Availability of solar panel Availability of TV
No Yes No Yes No Yes
5% No Yes
5% 29%
55%
45%
71%
95% 95%
79%
69%
91% 87%
27%
28% 30%
72% 70%
73%
IN SCHOOLS
GOVT PVT
26%
29% 33%
30%
67%
74% 70%
71%
No Yes No Yes
38% 36%
62% 64%
29.28
+ 37.58
33.15
98% 98.08
Has Your Family been Impacted by Natural Disaster? To What Extent Was Your Income Impacted?
Less than 10% btw 11% - 25% btw 26% - 50% More than 50% No affect
Yes, signficantly Yes, moderately No, not affected
3%
3%
20.07 4%
3.98 23%
67%
75.96
Was Children's Schooling Affected By Natural Disaster? Has Your Psychological Well Being Been Affected Due to Climate Change?
Moderately Affected Somewhat affected Extremely affected Not at all Not at all Substan ally affected Affected only a bit Some what affected
1.32 3.2
2.61
6.58
22.02
19.51
74.06 70.7
IN SCHOOLS
GOVT PVT
School damaged by any natural disaster Extend of the damaged caused by School damaged by any natural disaster Extend of the damaged caused by
natural disaster natural disaster
No Yes No Yes
fully par ally fully par ally
16
18% 2%
4
82% 84 96
98%
Recieved assistance for the recovery of damage Recieved assistance for the recovery of damage
No Yes No Yes
39
48% 52%
Rs Rs
61
% Children that Received None of the Five Basic Vaccines Whether Parent/Guardian Have a Vaccina on Card, Other Document or Both
Have None
6% 31%
69%
Diagnosed With a Health Problem By Doctor or Heathcare Provider Has the Child Received Deworming Pills or Any Other Medicine in School?
No Yes
90 85.56
80
70
31.39
60
50
40
30
20
7.77 68.61
10 3.84
0.35 0.58 0.64 1.28
0
Type-2 Epilepsy Blood Asthma Heart Allergies Other
Diabetes disorder condi ons
Yes No
100%
80%
60% 79%
89%
97% 99% 99%
40%
20%
21%
11%
0% 3% 1% 1%
BISP recipient Other recipient Akhuwat PSPA recipient Baitul Maal
recipient recipient
SINDH
(RURAL)
SINDH - RURAL 2023
Facilitated by Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi
% Children
61 55
14 - 16 62.7 9.7 0.3 0.7 16.0 10.6 100 60
39 45
40
6 - 16 75.9 8.4 0.3 1.2 10.3 3.8 100
20
Total 85.9 14.1 100 0
Government schools Private schools
By Type 88.4 9.8 0.3 1.4
40 50
30 40
% Children
22
% Children
20 14 14 30
12 10
10 9
6 6 4 20
13
3
0 10 7 8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6 10 6
Class 0
2019 2021 2023
61
60 46
5 34.7 1.6 0.3 2.7 60.8 100
40
3 to 5 34.2 2.1 0.2 1.2 62.3 100 20
Total 37.7 62.3 100 0
Age 3 Age 4 Age 5
By Type 90.7 5.6 0.5 3.1
1 100 37.27 15.98 7.59 3.15 0 1.59 0.57 0.98 0.29 0.8 1.71 19.42
2 0 62.73 24.68 16.03 7.22 0 1.19 1.19 0.27 0.38 0.32 0.49 14.05
3 0 59.34 22.04 15.23 9.21 5.1 2.08 1.3 1.06 0.96 0.98 13.37
4 0 54.34 20.54 14.39 8.79 5.7 2.93 2.02 1.11 1.95 12.54
% Children
5 8.7 11.6 18.1 23.1 38.5 100 58 62
60
6 10.2 10.0 23.6 21.2 35.0 100
7 9.2 8.0 19.0 21.1 42.7 100 40 26 28
18 23
8 10.9 6.0 11.1 23.0 48.9 100 20
9 12.4 3.6 7.7 18.8 57.6 100 0
10 5.2 2.7 7.9 14.3 70.0 100 Class 1: Can read at Class 3: Can read at Class 5: Can read at
least letters least sentences least story
How to read: 4.7% (3.5+1.2) children of class 1 can read atleast sentence
Children who can read story Urdu/Sindhi Learning levels by gender Learning levels: out-of-school (Urdu/Sindhi)
(Urdu/Sindhi) Children (Age 5 to 16 years)
2019 2021 2023 Children (Age 5 to 16 years)
100
100
100 80 71
80
% Children
% Children
80 60 60
% Children
40 38 33
60
38 35 20 40
40
14 0
20 20 11 10
Boys Girls 5
8 4
0 Who can read at least sentences 0
Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 Beginner Letters Words Sentences Story
Class-wise % children who can read Learning levels by school type English
Who can read sentences Learning levels by gender English Learning levels: out-of-school English
Children (Age 5-16 years) English Children (Age 5 to 16 years) Children (Age 5 to 16 years)
60
% Children
80 60
41 36
% Children
60 40
40
40 33 20
22 20
11 0 8 6 6 3
20
Boys Girls 0
5 Beginner Capital Small Words Sentences
0
Who can read at least words letters le ers
Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6
100
1 45.8 31.8 12.2 5.1 3.2 1.1 0.8 100
2 21.8 30.1 21.7 12.0 9.2 4.0 1.2 100 80
3 17.3 17.7 23.1 15.3 16.1 8.0 2.5 100
% Children
60
4 11.7 9.7 20.0 18.5 19.7 13.1 7.4 100
5 7.6 5.7 10.2 13.4 18.0 18.2 27.0 100 40
6 10.7 5.9 8.8 14.4 15.4 17.7 27.1 100 23 26 28 29
20 16 18
7 9.0 5.4 6.2 13.1 14.0 17.0 35.4 100
8 11.1 2.5 5.0 8.7 10.8 14.6 47.2 100 0
9 12.7 2.4 2.6 6.8 7.4 12.0 56.2 100 Class 1: Can Class 3: Can at Class 5: Can at
10 5.6 0.9 3.0 7.0 6.5 12.4 64.7 100 recognize at least least do least do division
numbers (10-99) subtrac on
How to read: 5.1% (3.2+1.1+0.8) children of class 1 can do atleast subtrac on
Children who can do division Learning levels by gender Arithme c Learning levels: out-of-school children Arithme c
(Age 5 to 16 years) Children (Age 5 to 16 years)
100
2019 2021 2023 100
80
80 70
100
% Children
% Children
60 60
80
40 35
% Children
40 40
60
20
40 27 20
27 7 6 5 5
0 2 3
20 0
7 Boys Girls
0 3 Beginner Number Subtrac on 2 Division
Who can at least do subtrac on recogni on 10- digits
Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 99
Govt. 3.0 3.5 4.5 5.8 4.8 6.4 9.6 7.1 11.8 13.5 5.4
8.2
Pvt. 35.1 37.3 40.2 38.4 37.6 42.6 37.2 38.3 40.2 52.0 38.7
Parental educa on
Children a ending paid tui on
Parental Educa on- atleast primary
Government schools Private schools
Mothers Fathers 100
100
80
80
% Children
60
% Parents
60
44 47 39
40 40
40
26 22
20 17 20 16
20 12
4 5
0 0
2019 2021 2023 2019 2021 2023
Children a endance 75% 80% 75% 76% 76% 88% 87% 89% 83% 88%
Teacher a endance 89% 89% 94% 85% 88% 93% 95% 83% 92%
Government schools (%) Private schools (%) Government schools (%) Private schools (%)
Matricula on 3.53 11.29 PTC 9.2 19.92
FA 8.61 25.81 CT 13.15 25.5
BA 42.89 41.06 B-Ed 45.61 33.86
MA or above 42.95 20.38 M-Ed or above 29.11 11.95
Others 2.03 1.47 Others 2.93 8.76
GRANTS
100% 100%
100% 100%
84% 92%
75% 83%
72% 78% 80% 75% 80% 80% 77%
72%
56% 56%
47% 50% 50% 56% 54% 52%
43% 45%43% 50% 48% 44%
39%
30% 31%
28% 22% 25% 20%
19% 17%
12%
4% 5% 6%
100% 69%
89% 60%
83%
48% 51%
48% 67% 47%
54% 49% 50% 48%
26%
16% 14%
5%
9%
Boundary Wall Toilets Playground Water Boundary Wall Toilets Playground Water
Class 2 Class 8
2023 2021
DISABILITIES AND FUNCTIONING IN SCHOOLS (% SCHOOLS)
Government Schools Private Schools
Children with Disabili es
Primary Elementary Secondary Overall Primary Elementary Secondary Other Overall
No Disability 97% 90% 91% 96% 94% 100% 100% 95% 98%
Some Disability 3% 10% 9% 4% 6% 0% 0% 5% 2%
0.36 0.07
0.2 0.04
0.01
0.04 0
0.01
0 0 0 0
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Hearing Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Hearing Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
Government School Private School Government School Private School
0.13
0.08
0.09
0.05
0.01 0.01
0 0 0 0 0 0
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Physical Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Physical Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
0.22
0.4
0.28
0.1
0.14 0.08
0.11
0.04 0.02
0 0 0
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Intellectual Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Intellectual Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
0.64 0.4
0.4 0.43
0.175
0.04
0 0 0.01 0 0.01 0
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Self Care Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Self Care Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
0.1 0.1
0.03
0.01 0.01 0.01
0 0
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Communica on Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Communica on Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
0.11 0.05
0.07
0.05
0 0.01 0 0 0 0 0.01 0
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
*The graphs on disability report findings based on the Washington Short Set which assesses children across six func onings: visual, hearing, physical, intellectual, self-care and communica on with others, by school type and gender.
· 23% of class 5 children enrolled in private schools can other classes were observed with one teacher
read at least sentences in English whereas only 21% teaching more than one grade.
government school children can do the same. · 48% of the surveyed government schools (53% in
· 18% of children enrolled in class 5 in private schools 2021) and 26% of the surveyed private schools (35% in
were able to do division as compared to 16% class 5 2021) had Class 2 sitting with other classes.
children enrolled in government schools. · 9% of surveyed government schools (as compared to
6% in 2021) and 16% of surveyed private schools (29%
THEME 5: GENDER GAP in 2021) had class 8 sitting with other classes.
Gender gap in learning: boys outperform girls (age 5-16 THEME 9: TEACHER & STUDENT ATTENDANCE
overall) in literacy and numeracy skills:
Student attendance is recorded by taking a headcount of all
· 38% of boys and 33% of girls could read at least students present in school on the day of visit.
sentences in Urdu/Sindhi. · Overall student attendance in surveyed government
· 41% boys could read at least English words while 36% schools was 76% whereas it was 88% in private
of girls can do the same. schools.
· 40% of boys were able to do at least subtraction · 71% school teachers in Government Schools and 83%
compared to 35% girls. Private School teachers follow up with parents in case
of student absence.
THEME 6: PARENTAL EDUCATION · Teacher attendance is recorded by referring to the
appointed positions in each school and the total
· 20% mothers (20% in 2021) and 20% fathers (47% in number of teachers present on the day of survey.
2021) in the sampled households had completed at · Overall teacher attendance in surveyed government
least primary education. schools was 88% whereas it was 93% in private
schools.
THEME 7: PAID TUITIONS
THEME 10: TEACHERS' QUALIFICATION
Private tuition incidence is greater for private school
students. Overall, 39% students enrolled in private schools
are attending paid tuition as compared to 5% students · 43% teachers in surveyed government schools have
enrolled in government schools (22% in 2021). done graduation as compared to 41% teachers in
private schools.
· Children across all classes/grades take private tuition. · However, 43% have completed M.Ed. in government
In government schools, 3% of children enrolled in class schools compared to 20% in private schools.
1 take tuition as compared to 14% children in class 10.
· In 2021, percentage of government school students THEME 11: CAPACITY BUILDING OF TEACHERS
availing paid tuition had increased to 22% from 4% in
2019 due to school closures. The decrease in share of
government school students attending paid tuition by · 56% of public-school teachers and 81% of private
17% (5% in 2023 compared to 22% in 2021) reflects the school teachers received training in the preceding 30
return to pre-pandemic levels. days or more from the date of survey.
· According to the public sector Head Teachers,
THEME 8: MULTI-GRADE TEACHING Assessment (16%), Community Engagement (13%),
Pedagogy (13%), Education and technology (12%) and
48% of surveyed government schools and 26% of surveyed School Leadership (11%) are the key areas of teacher
private schools had Class 2 students sitting with other training; followed by Subject Specific Knowledge
classes. (10%) and Curriculum (10%).
· In comparison, for the private sector, Curriculum
· Children of Class 2 and Class 8 sitting together with any
(16%), Pedagogy (13%) and Assessment (13%) are the
87%
60%
71% 79%
95% 74%
87%
96%
65% 63%
56%
IN SCHOOLS
GOVT PVT
40% 48%
60%
52%
95%
76%
No Yes No Yes
6%
52% 48%
94%
+
49%
49.49
51%
32.5
90.79
Has Your Family been Impacted by Natural Disaster? To What Extent Was Your Income Impacted?
Less than 10% More than 50% btw 26% - 50% btw 11% - 25% No affect
Yes, signficantly Yes, moderately No, not affected
15%
30%
35.17 34.35
18%
19% 18%
30.47
Was Children's Schooling Affected By Natural Disaster? Has Your Psychological Well Being Been Affected Due to Climate Change?
Somewhat affected Moderately Affected Extremely affected Not at all Total Not at all Substan ally affected Some what affected
11.21 22.79
16.79 27.63
47.36
100
24.64 40.78
IN SCHOOLS
GOVT PVT
School damaged by any natural disaster Extend of the damaged caused by School damaged by any natural disaster Extend of the damaged caused by
natural disaster natural disaster
No Yes No Yes
fully par ally fully par ally
12% 6
46
53% 47%
54
88% 94
Recieved assistance for the recovery of damage Recieved assistance for the recovery of damage
No Yes No Yes
16%
47
Rs Rs 53
84%
% Children that Received None of the Five Basic Vaccines Whether Parent/Guardian Have a Vaccina on Card, Other Document or Both
Have None
37%
10%
63%
Diagnosed With a Health Problem By Doctor or Heathcare Provider Has the Child Received Deworming Pills or Any Other Medicine in School?
No Yes
90 84.72
6.42
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10 8.83
0.22 0.54 0.89 1.92 2.87
0
Epilepsy Type-2 Blood Asthma Heart Allergies Other 93.58
Diabetes disorder condi ons
80%
69%
60%
95% 99% 100%
40%
20%
31%
0% 5% 1% 0%
BISP recipient Other recipient Akhuwat recipient Baitul Maal recipient
AZAD JAMMU
& KASHMIR
(RURAL)
AZAD JAMMU & KASHMIR - RURAL 2023
Facilitated by Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi
% Children
60 51 49 51 49
14 - 16 54.1 41.1 1.1 0.1 1.5 2.1 100
40
6 - 16 51.7 44.7 0.8 0.4 1.4 0.9 100
20
Total 97.7 2.3 100 0
Government schools Private schools
By Type 52.9 45.8 0.8 0.5
40
% Children
20
10 10 11 11 11 10 10 30
8 9 9
10 20
0 10 4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 1.2
0 2 4 1.0
Class
2019 2021 2023
1 100 28.48 34.09 17.83 6.96 2.94 0.88 0.79 0.52 0.83 1.23 2.94 13.64
2 0 71.52 23.86 23.11 20.02 7.23 2.63 1.22 1.14 0.74 0.82 0.98 12.99
3 0 42.05 22.2 23.5 17.16 8.77 4.09 1.24 0.37 0.14 0 11.17
4 0 36.85 17.58 19.72 18.8 10.39 4.56 2.31 1.36 0.82 10.84
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
% Children
5 5.2 0.9 3.9 13.9 76.1 100
60
6 6.2 0.2 1.2 7.4 85.0 100
7 3.4 0.1 0.0 4.2 92.4 100 40
8 5.3 0.0 0.2 1.2 93.3 100 20
9 2.7 0.1 0.1 1.0 96.1 100 0
10 1.9 0.1 0.0 0.9 97.0 100 Class 1: Can read at Class 3: Can read at Class 5: Can read at
least le ers least sentences least story
How to read: 20.4% (8.9+11.5) children of class 1 can read atleast sentence
Children who can read story Urdu Learning levels by gender Learning levels: out-of-school children (Urdu)
(Urdu) Children (Age 5 to 16 years)
2019 2021 2023 Children (Age 5 to 16 years)
100
100 100
85 80 80
76 80
% Children
80 69 68
% Children
66 60
% Children
60
60 40
42 40
40 20
0 14
20 20
Boys Girls 5
0 1 0
Who can read at least sentences 0
Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 Beginner Le ers Words Sentences Story
Who can read sentences Learning levels by gender English 5 to Learning levels: out-of-school English
Children (Age 5-16 years) English 16 years Children (Age 5 to 16 years)
80 80
100 71 71 80
% Children
81 60
% Children
80 70 60
65
% Children
60 40
40
40 20
40
20 13
20 0
Boys Girls 4 4
0 0
0
Who can read at least words Beginner Capital Small letters Words Sentences
Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 letters
100
1 16.3 20.7 24.2 19.9 8.6 3.1 7.2 100
2 7.1 6.9 18.1 22.4 20.6 12.6 12.3 100 80 71
67 66
% Children
3 6.9 3.4 5.4 16.2 20.0 21.6 26.4 100 62 63
60 56
4 6.5 0.6 2.4 8.2 11.6 17.4 53.3 100
40
5 5.5 1.0 2.2 7.9 9.0 14.6 59.7 100
6 6.6 0.3 0.3 3.1 4.4 10.4 74.8 100 20
7 3.6 0.1 0.1 2.8 3.8 7.4 82.2 100
0
8 5.4 0.0 0.3 1.5 2.2 4.0 86.7 100 Class 1: Can Class 3: Can at Class 5: Can at
9 3.0 0.0 0.2 0.5 1.2 1.3 93.8 100 recognize at least least do least do division
10 2.2 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.0 0.6 95.1 100 numbers (10-99) subtraction
How to read: 18.9% (8.6+3.1+7.2) children of class 1 can do atleast subtrac on
Children who can do division Learning levels by gender Arithme c Learning levels: out-of-school Arithme c
(Age 5 to 16) Children (Age 5 to 16 years) Children (Age 5 to 16 years)
Govt. 3.9 4.7 7.0 5.6 4.2 4.2 2.8 3.9 5.0 7.4 4.5
6.2
Pvt. 5.1 8.3 9.8 6.6 7.9 10.2 5.4 7.3 12.1 14.1 8.0
Parental educa on
Children a ending paid tui on
Parental Educa on- atleast Primary Government schools Private schools
Mothers Fathers 100
100
80
83 79
80 72 71
% Children
65 60
59
% Parents
60
40
40
26
20 18
20 13
5 5 8
0 0
2019 2021 2023 2019 2021 2023
Primary 49 14 19 82 62 1 0 63
Elementary 33 21 12 66 75 1 0 76
High 34 28 25 87 51 1 0 52
Others 19 27 13 59 42 2 0 44
Total 135 90 69 294 230 5 0 235
Children a endance 80% 87% 90% 87% 90% 86% 86% 93% 87.0%
Teacher a endance 95% 91% 92% 74% 92% 91% 84% 80% 86% 86%
GRANTS
Boundary Wall Toilets Playground Water Boundary Wall Toilets Playground Water
Class 2 Class 8 2023 2021
1.00 1.00
1.33
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Hearing Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Hearing Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
Government School Private School Government School Private School
1.67 1.75
1.33
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.00 0.00
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Physical Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Physical Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
2.50
1.50
1.91 1.33 1.33
1.22
1.50 1.00
1.00 1.00
0.00 0.00
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Intellectual Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Intellectual Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
1.50
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Self Care Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Self Care Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all Some Dificulty A lot of Dificulty Cannot do at all
Male Female
Communication Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools Communica on Disability - Children (Avg.) in Schools
4.00 2.00
1.50
2.00 1.00
1.00
Male Female
*The graphs on disability report findings based on the Washington Short Set which assesses children across six func onings: visual, hearing, physical, intellectual, self-care and communica on with others, by school type and gender.
· 50% of all school-aged children in the age bracket of 3- · 74% children enrolled in class 5 in government schools
5 years were enrolled in ECE compared to 52% in 2021. can read at least a story in Urdu as compared to 73%
· 50% children of age 3-5 are currently not enrolled in class 5 children enrolled in private schools.
· 71% of class 5 children enrolled in government
schools can read at least sentences in English whereas other classes were observed with one teacher
only 68% private school children can do the same. teaching more than one grade.
· 63% of children enrolled in class 5 in government · 59% of the surveyed government schools (40% in
schools were able to do division as compared to 56% 2021) and 40% of the surveyed private schools (26% in
class 5 children enrolled in private schools. 2021) had Class 2 sitting with other classes.
· 10% of surveyed government schools (as compared to
THEME 5: GENDER GAP 12% in 2021) and 11% of surveyed private schools
(18% in 2021) had class 8 sitting with other classes.
Gender gap in learning: boys slightly outperform girls (age
· There is a marked increase in multigrading in class 2
5-16 overall) in literacy while they are at par with girls in
and decrease in class 8 across government and non-
numeracy skills.
state institutions/private schools.
· 69% of boys and 68% of girls could read at least THEME 9: TEACHER & STUDENT ATTENDANCE
sentences in Urdu.
· 71% boys could read at least English words while 71%
of girls can do the same. Student attendance is recorded by taking a headcount of all
· 67% of boys were able to do at least subtraction students present in school on the day of visit.
compared to 67% girls. · Overall student attendance in both surveyed
government and private schools was 87%.
THEME 6: PARENTAL EDUCATION · 79% of schoolteachers in Government Schools and
80% Private School teachers follow up with parents in
· 59% mothers (79% in 2021) and 74% fathers (65% in case of student absence.
2021) in the sampled households had completed at · Teacher attendance is recorded by referring to the
least primary education. appointed positions in each school and the total
number of teachers present on the day of survey.
THEME 7: PAID TUITIONS · Overall teacher attendance in surveyed government
schools was 92% whereas it was 86% in private
Private tuition incidence is greater for private school
schools.
students. Overall, 8% of students enrolled in private
schools are attending paid tuition as compared to 5%
THEME 10: TEACHERS' QUALIFICATION
students enrolled in government schools (18% in 2021).
· 30% of teachers in surveyed government schools have
· Children across all classes/grades take private tuition. done graduation as compared to 44% teachers in
In government schools, 4% of children enrolled in class private schools.
1 take tuition as compared to 7% children in class 10. · However, 62% have completed M.Ed. in government
· In 2021, the percentage of government school schools compared to 41% in private schools.
students availing paid tuition had increased to 18%
from 5% in 2019 due to school closures. The decrease THEME 11: CAPACITY BUILDING OF TEACHERS
in share of government school students attending paid
tuition by 13% (5% in 2023 compared to 18% in 2021) · 16% of public-school teachers and 13% of private
reflects the return to pre-pandemic levels. school teachers received training in the preceding 30
days or more from the date of survey.
THEME 8: MULTI-GRADE TEACHING · According to the public sector Head Teachers,
Pedagogy (13%), Curriculum (12%) and Assessment
59% of surveyed government schools and 40% of surveyed
(11%) are the key areas of teacher training; followed
private schools had Class 2 students sitting with other
by School Leadership (10%) and Subject Specific
classes.
Knowledge (10%).
· Children of Class 2 and Class 8 sitting together with any · In comparison, for the private sector, Pedagogy (17%),
Curriculum (14%), and School Leadership (11%) are
the key areas for teacher training, followed by computer labs and 6% had internet availability.
Classroom Management (11%) and Education and THEME 14: SCHOOL GRANTS/FUNDS
Technology (10%).
· Whereas the core teacher training needs identified by A higher share of government schools as compared to
the Head Teachers in public and private schools were private schools received grants in the academic year
2022
Pedagogy (12%), Curriculum (10%) and School
Leadership (10%); followed by Assessment (9%),
Subject Specific Knowledge (9%), Education & · 1% government primary schools and 0% private
Technology (9%) and Classroom Management (8%). primary schools received grants in the academic year
2022.
THEME 12: PARENT TEACHER MEETINGS · 3% government elementary schools and 1% private
elementary schools received grants in the academic
· 21% of surveyed government schools schedule year 2022.
monthly parent-teacher meetings as compared to · 5% government secondary schools and 2% private
52% of private schools. secondary schools received grants in the academic
year 2022.
THEME 13: SCHOOL FACILITIES
THEME 15: DISABILITIES & FUNCTIONINGS
GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS:
· As part of the school-level survey, data on children
· 67% of the surveyed government primary schools with disabilities (CWDs) was also collected. Head
have functional toilets as compared to 56% in 2021. teachers/teachers were interviewed using the
· 56% of the surveyed government primary schools Washington-UNICEF Short Set of questions, also
have clean drinking water available in contrast to 49% known as the Washington Group/UNICEF Module on
in 2021. Child Functioning, which assesses children against 6
· 56% of the surveyed government primary schools had functionings i.e., visual, hearing, physical, intellectual,
complete boundary walls as compared to 57% in self-care and communication with others.
2021. · At the provincial level, 15% of the surveyed
· 44% of surveyed government primary schools had government schools and 13% of private schools
playgrounds as compared to 41% in 2021. reported to have children with some disabilities.
· 63% of surveyed government primary schools had
electricity connection as compared to 64.5% in 2021. THEME 16: HOUSEHOLDS' ACCESS TO TECHNOLOGY &
· 4% of surveyed government secondary schools had KNOWLEDGE OF ITS USAGE
computer labs and 0% had internet facilities.
· ASER 2023 (rural) included a range of questions at the
PRIVATE SCHOOLS: household level regarding access to technology and
knowledge of its usage.
· 79% of the surveyed private primary schools have · 89% of households across all rural districts have access
functional toilets as opposed to 91% in 2021. to mobile phones and 74% have smart phones.
· 74% of the surveyed private primary schools have · Amongst mobile users, 63% use WhatsApp services,
clean drinking water available as compared to 59% in whilst 73% use (SMS) text messaging.
2021. · 26% have an internet connection and 16% have
· 43% of the surveyed private primary schools had computers. 62% of households have TV and 22% have
complete boundary walls in contrast to 49% in 2021. radio.
· 57% of surveyed private primary schools had · On average, at least 1 household member can use a
playgrounds as compared to 31% in 2021. smartphone.
· 78% of surveyed private primary schools had
THEME 17: HOUSEHOLDS' ACCESS TO SOCIAL SAFETY
electricity connection as compared to 44% in 2021.
NETS & IMPACT ON INCOME AND WELL-BEING
· 6% of surveyed private secondary schools had
66% 62%
97% 94%
84%
78% 74%
89%
63%
74%
76%
IN SCHOOLS
GOVT PVT
92%
84% 90%
88%
No Yes No Yes
3% 6%
97% 94%
49.31
26.7
98% 98.84
Has Your Family been Impacted by Natural Disaster? To What Extent Was Your Income Impacted?
More than 50% btw 11% - 25% btw 26% - 50% Less than 10% No affect
Yes, signficantly Yes, moderately No, not affected
3%
4%
23.84 8%
6.76 22%
63%
69.4
Was Children's Schooling Affected By Natural Disaster? Has Your Psychological Well Being Been Affected Due to Climate Change?
Somewhat affected Moderately Affected Extremely affected Not at all Not at all Substan ally affected Some what affected Affected only a bit
1.76 3.26
2.13
4.56
34.37
28.59
61.73
63.6
IN SCHOOLS
GOVT PVT
School damaged by any natural disaster Extend of the damaged caused by School damaged by any natural disaster Extend of the damaged caused by
natural disaster natural disaster
No Yes No Yes
fully par ally fully par ally
11
25% 0
30%
75% 70%
89 100
Recieved assistance for the recovery of damage Recieved assistance for the recovery of damage
No Yes No Yes
38% 33
Rs Rs
62% 67
% Children that Received None of the Five Basic Vaccines Whether Parent/Guardian Have a Vaccina on Card, Other Document or Both
27%
Have a Vaccina on Card,
Other Document or Both
Have None
15%
73%
Diagnosed With a Health Problem By Doctor or Heathcare Provider Has the Child Received Deworming Pills or Any Other Medicine in School?
No Yes
90
4.87
80 77.05
70
60
50
40
30
20
11.87
10 5.77
0.41 0.9 1.54 2.47
0
Blood Epilepsy Type-2 Asthma Allergies Heart Other 95.13
disorder Diabetes condi ons
Yes No
100%
80%
60%
90%
99% 99% 100%
40%
20%
10%
0% 1% 1% 0%
BISP recipient Akhuwat recipient Baitul Maal recipient Other recipient
ABOUT
THE
SURVEY
SAMPLE DESIGN – Rural (Villages)
Total Popula on: The total popula on of this survey consists of 151 rural districts of Pakistan.
• A village list.
• Data from the Popula on Census 2017 on the total number of households.
• Total popula on of each village in the list.
• Keeping in view the variability of the key variables, popula on distribu on and field resources, a total sample
of 600 households pertaining to 20 households from each village is being used.
• Sample primary sampling units (PSUs) have been considered sufficient to produce reliable es mates with 5%
margin of errors at 95% level of confidence.
• The detailed alloca on plan is shown below:
Number of Districts Number of Villages per District Number of Households per Village
151 30 20
Sample Design: A two stage sample design was adopted:
• First stage: 30 villages selected using the provisional village directory of the 2017 census1.
• Second stage: 20 households are selected in each of the 30 selected villages.
Selec on of Primary Sampling Units (PSUs): Villages of districts have been taken as PSUs:
• Sample PSUs have been selected using probability propor onal to size (PPS) method.
• Every year, 20 villages from the previous year are retained and 10 new villages are added. Ten villages are
dropped from the previous year’s list and 10 new villages are added from the popula on census village
directory. The 10 new villages are also chosen using PPS.
• The 20 old villages and the 10 new villages give us a” rota ng panel” of villages, which generates be er
es mates of changes.
Selec on of Secondary Sampling Units (SSUs): Households have been treated as secondary sampling units (SSUs).
• Based on actual households in each sample PSUs, 20 households have been selected.
• We divide the village into four parts:
o In each of the four parts, started from the central loca on and pick every 5 th household on the le hand-
side in a circular fashion ll 5 households are selected from each part.
Selec on of School
· 1 government school from each selected village (Mandatory)
· 1 private school from each selected village (Op onal)
1
“Block wise provisional summary results of 6 th popula on and housing 2017 (as on January 03,2018)” by census
division, Pakistan Bureau of Sta s cs www.pbscensus.gov.pk
• Contact Village Elder: Introduce yourself to the village elder, councilor and/or to other senior members of the
Panchayat. As you walk to reach the village elder, Panchayat or Councilor, talk to different people and ask about
the village. Tell them about ASER. This ini al walking and talking may take more than an hour. Get the approximate
popula on number of households, languages spoken, and gas connec on in the village from the Councilor.
• Also get informa on about Private schools, Hospital, dispensary, and maternity center (if available how many
private schools in each category of private school i.e. purely private school, founda on assisted, trust/NGO, Special
educa on).
• Ask about Government schools, Madrassa, private clinic (if available ask how many),
• While roaming in the village check for electric wiring/transformers for electricity connec on.
It is important that ASER is introduced clearly and simply to the villagers. Following is a suggested
way of explaining your purpose of visi ng the village and the ASER survey: Our team is doing a
survey on quality of educa on in Pakistan called Annual Status of Educa on Repo rt (ASER). We
want to know if the children of age 3-16 are learning anything in the school or outside of it i.e. in
home. We are conduc ng this research in more than 4,500 villages and in 149 rural districts of
Pakistan and your village has been selected as one of them. We will also go to one government
school here and one private school (if there is one in the area) to look at their standard. We will
select 20 households in your village and ask children to read and do mathema c sums etc. This way
you will also know the standard of educa on, and as we ask the government, the village should
also come together to improve educa onal standards.
o Talk to people: How many different hamlets/sec ons are in the village? Where are they located? What is the
social composi on of the households in each hamlet/sec on? What is the es mate of households in each
hamlet/sec on? How many government and private schools are in the village? Tell them about ASER.
It is o en helpful to first draw all the roads or paths coming into the village and going out of the village. It helps to first
draw a rough sketch on the ground so that people around you can see what is being done. Mark hamlets, schools,
households etc. with landmarks. With the help of the community members, iden fy different hamlets and their center
point.
• Go to each hamlet/sec on. Try to find the central point in that habita on. Stand facing the houses in the center of
the habita on. Visit every 5th house from the le -hand side in the habita on (e.g. 1st house, 6th house, 11th house,
16th house, and so on). Get informa on about the household and children following instruc ons in the next
sec on.
o House Closed: If the selected house is closed or if there is nobody at home, note that down on your
compila on sheet as “House Closed”. This household DOES NOT count as a surveyed household. Move
to the next/adjacent open house. Con nue un l you have 5 households in each hamlet/sec on in
which there were inhabitants.
o No Response: If a household refuses to par cipate, note that down on your compila on sheet as “No
Response”. However, as above, this household DOES NOT count as a surveyed household. Move on to
the next house. Con nue un l you have 5 households in each hamlet/sec on in which not only were
the inhabitants present, but they also par cipated in the survey.
o No Children: If there are no children or no children in the age group of 3–16 years in a household but
there are inhabitants, this household Does Not count as surveyed household.
• Stop a er you have completed 5 households in each hamlet/sec on. If you have reached the end of the sec on
before 5 households are sampled, go around again using the same every 5th household on the le -hand side rule.
If a surveyed household gets selected again, then go to the next household. Con nue the survey ll you have 5
households in the sec on.
• Now move to the next selected hamlet/sec on. Follow the same process.
• Make sure that you go to households ONLY WHEN children are likely to be at home. This means that the day of the
household survey should be a Sunday or holiday.
• If every house is turning out to be a No Response house, think about your team and strategy. It may be because
there are two male members going to the houses hence refused permission.
Household with mul ple kitchens: If there is more than one kitchen (chulhas) in the selected household, then
randomly select any one of the kitchens in the household and record the total number of family members who eat
from that chosen kitchen.
o Ask all children in this age group their current schooling status, meaning whether the child is currently enrolled
in kachi or any other school, dropped out of school or was never enrolled in any school.
o Ask all (enrolled and dropped out) children if they take any private supplementary tui on (paid classes in
addi on to regular school).
o Also ask the enrolled children if they go to the specific school which you have/will be surveying. whether they
receive scholarship from government
• Children 5 to 16: On the Household sheet, note down child’s name, age, gender and all other details.
o Ask the current schooling status of each child, i.e. whether the child is currently enrolled in school, dropped
out of school or was never enrolled in any school.
o If the child is enrolled then note down the class which the child is a ending at the me of the survey and the
type of school each child is going to, i.e. government, private, madrassah or any other type of school.
o Ask all (enrolled and dropped out) children if they take any private supplementary tui on (paid classes in
addi on to regular school).
o Also ask the enrolled children if they go to the specific school which you have/will be surveying. and if they
receive any government scholarship?
o All children in this age group (5 to 16) will be tested in basic reading, arithme c and English. (We know that
younger children will not be able to read much or do sums but s ll follow the same process for all children so
as to keep the process uniform). Ensure that the child is comfortable before and during the test and that
sufficient time is given to each child.
o Ask the child if s/he has dropped out and the last class that has passed. Also ask for the reason of dropping out
or being never enrolled (such as law and order, poverty, flo od, school building shi ed by government or
others). Reasons for not enrolling and never enrolled is men oned at the bo om of the page with asterisk.
o Even the dropped out and never enrolled children aged 5 to 16 have to be tested.
OTHER THINGS TO REMEMBER:
o Non-resident children: Do not survey children who are visi ng their rela ves and friends in the sampled village.
o Older children: O en older girls and boys (in the age group 11 to 16) may not be thought of as children. Be
sensi ve to this issue and therefore avoid using words like “children”.
o Children out of the village: If there are children in the family but who are not present in the village during the
survey, do not take their details. There might be children of the household who study in other ci es, do not
include such children.
o Mothers under or 16 years of age: O en in villages, you can come across mothers who are less than 16 years
of age. Informa on on them will be collected as a mother as well as a child between the age 5 to 16 years, and
they will also be tested in all three assessments.
Many children may come up to you and want to be included in the process out of curiosity. Do not discourage these
children. You can interact with them. But concentrate on the fact that data must be noted down ONLY for children from
households that have been randomly selected.
o Parents’ Information: Following informa on regarding parent’s informa on will also be recorded:
▪ Name and Age
▪ Total number of Children (0 -16)
▪ Whether mother and/or father have gone to school?
▪ Mother and/or father’s educa on (Highest class completed)
▪ Does mother father have CNIC?
▪ Do not take informa on if the mother/father is Deceased/Alive.
▪ Is mother working woman and is she married/widowed.
Household Indicators: All informa on on household indicators is to be recorded based, as much as possible, on
observa on and evidence. However, if for some reason you cannot observe it note down what is reported by the
household. This informa on is being collected in order to link the educa on status of the child with household
economic condi ons.
1) House Ownership: Mark yes or no regarding the ownership of the house.
2) Type of house the child lives in: Types of houses are defined as follows:
• Kutcha House: The walls and/or roof of which are made of material other than those men oned here, such
as un-burnt bricks, bamboos, mud, grass, reeds, thatch, loosely packed stones, etc.
• Semi -Pucca house: A house that has fixed walls made up of pucca material but roof is made up of the
material other than those used for pucca house.
• Pucca House: A pucca house is one, which has walls and roof made of the following material.
Wall material: Burnt bricks, stones (packed with lime or cement), cement concrete, mber, ekra etc. Roof
Material: Tiles, GCI (Galvanised Corrugated Iron) sheets, asbestos cement sheet, RBC (Reinforced Brick
Concrete), RCC (Reinforced Cement Concrete) and mb er etc.
Sentences
• Ask the child to read any paragraph. Listen carefully as to how s/he reads.
Start • S/he may read slowly.
• However, as long as the child reads the text like a sentence and not like a
Here string of words, mark her/him at a ‘sentence’ level child.
If the child stops very o en while reading the sentence or ha s difficulty with If the child reads the sentences
more than 4 words in the sentence or reads it as a string of words than show fluently and with ease, then ask
her/him the list of words. her/him to read the story.
Words Story
• Ask the child to read any 5 words from the word list. Let the child choose the • Show the child the story. If s/he can
words themselves. If s/he does not choose, then point out words to her/him. read fluently and with ease, then
• If s/he can correctly read at least 4 out of 5 words with ease, then ask her/him mark her/him as a child who can read
to try to read the paragraph again. a story. The child who has been able
• S/he will be marked at the ‘words’ level if s/he can correctly read words but to read a story, should be asked two
is s ll struggling with the paragraph. ques ons about the story and be
marked accordingly.
• If she is unable to read the story
fluently and stops a lot, mark her/him
as a child who is at the paragraph
level.
If s/he cannot correctly read at least 4 out of 5 words she chooses, then show her/him the list of le ers.
• Ask the child to read any 5 le ers from the list. Let her /him choose the le ers. If s/he does not choose
then point out le ers to her/him.
• If s/he can correctly recognize at least 4 out of 5 le ers with ease, the n show her/him the list of words
Letters again.
• If s/he can read 4 out of 5 le ers but cannot read words, then mark her /him as a child who ‘can read
le ers’.
• If s/he cannot read 4 out of 5 le ers correctly, then mark her as a child as a ‘beginner’ .
Subtrac on
Start • Show the child the subtrac on problems. S/he can choose, if not you can
point.
Here
• Ask her/him to write and solve the problems. Observe to see if s/he does it
in the correct wri en numerical form.
• Ask her/him to do a second one.
If s/he cannot do both subtrac on problems, then give If s/he does both the subtrac on problems correctly,
her/him the number recogni on (100-200) task. ask her/him to do a division problem.
• Ask her/him to tell the me in the clock, if S/he answers correctly then mark as “can tell” otherwise
mark as “cannot tell”.
• Ask her/him to solve the problem # 2 and #3 on a piece of paper.
• Watch what s/he does.
• If s/he is able to follow the right method and solve with the right answer, then mark her/him as a
“can do” for each word problem otherwise mark her/him as “cannot do”.
• Ask at least one child from each household to do at least one word-problem at the back of the
household sheet.
Start
Capital Letters Here
Point one by one to at least 5 le ers. Ask the child to iden fy the le ers.
• If s/he correctly recognizes 4 out of 5 capital le ers then show her/him the If s/he is unable to recognize 4 out of
list of small le ers. 5 capital le ers from the list, then
• If s/he reads capital le ers but is struggling with iden fying small le ers, then mark her/him under the category
mark her/him as a child who can read ‘capital le ers’. ‘nothing’.
Small Letters
Point one by one to at least 5 le ers. Ask her/him to iden fy the le ers.
If s/he can recognize 4 out of 5 small le ers with ease, If s/he reads small le ers but is struggling with words, then
then show her/him the list of words. mark her/him as a child who can read ‘small le ers’
Words
Point one by one to at least 5 words. Ask her/him to iden fy words.
If s/he correctly reads 4 out of 5 words, then show If s/he reads words but is struggling with reading
her/him the list of sentences. sentences, then mark her/him as ‘word’ level child.
Sentences
Ask her/him to read the 4 sentences. If s/he reads all 4 correctly, then mark her/him at the ‘sentence level’.
Meaning of the words are only to be asked from children who are at word or sentence level. If the child is able to tell the
Bonus Ques ons
meanings of 4 out of 5 words s/he has read, mark the child as “yes” ; if not, mark as “no”.
Meaning of the sentences should only be asked from children who are at sentence level. If the child can read at least 2 out
of the 4 sentences fluently, than ask the child to translate the sentence into his/her local language. If the child can trans late
the sentences, mark him/her as a “yes”, otherwise mark him/her as a “no”.
ENGLISH
This sec on should only be asked from children who are at “Word” level on English Tool.
a) Ask the child to see the picture and then ask two ques ons from the child. Mark “yes” if the
child answer correctly, otherwise mark as “no”.
b) Ask the child to complete the sentences by iden fying the picture of the items drawn on the
sample. If a child answers any two correctly, mark him/her “yes”, otherwise “no”.
• Take permission from Head Masters/Mistress or Teacher of respec ve Class before observing the class.
• Visit any government school in the village with classes from Class 1 to 10 or High School. If there is no High school
in the village, then go to a Middle School, in case Middle School is not available then go to a primary school. In
the top box of the Observa on Sheet, mark the school type. If there is no government school in the village, than
go to the nearest Government School located in a nearby village.
• If the village has a Boy’s High School and a Girl’s High School, preference should be given to the girl’s school.
• Meet the Head Master/Head Mistress (if the Head Master/Mistress (HM) is absent, then meet the senior most
teacher of the school) and note down the following informa on:
• Record the name of the School, name of the village, and name of Tehsil/Taluka, District/Agency an d the
Province.
• Tick the school level i.e. Kachi/ECE to 5, Class 1 to 5, Class 1 to 8, and Class 1 to 10.
• Tick the respec ve box for type of school i.e. High, Middle, Primary or Others.
• Tick type of school (by enrollment):
o Boys and Girls School
o Boys only School
o Girls only School
• Tick the Medium of Instruc on
o English
o Urdu
o Pashto
o Sindhi
o Arabic
o Or any other medium
• EMIS/BEMIS/SEMIS Code: write the EMIS/BEMIS/SEMIS code of the school.
• Write down school’s establishment year.
• If it is a private school or not, and whether the school is affiliated with any NGO.
• Note the Time of Entry into the school and Time of Exit from School.
• Date of visit: write down the date of survey
When at the school, ask the Head Master for the enrollment register or any official record of the school’s enrolment.
What to do in Government/Private School?
1. ASK for the registers of all the Classes and fill in the enrollment. If there is more than one sec on for same class,
add the enrollment of all the sec ons and write accordingly.
2. Make sure the HM has introduced you to the teacher. If not, introduce yourself and the ASER survey. Request
for his/her permission to collect informa on on the classroom.
3. MOVE AROUND the class/area where children are seated and take down their a endance class-wise by counting
them YOURSELF. You may need to seek help from the teachers to dis nguish children class -wise as they are
normally found seated in mixed groups. In such a case, ask children from each standard to raise their hands.
Count the number of raised hands and accordingly fill the same in the observa on sheet, class-wise. Please note
that you should only COUNT those children who are physically present in the class.
4. You can fill this informa on a er you have collected all informa on from school records and reg isters. But make
sure you do the head count of children enrolled in the school yourself also.
1. This sec on is to be filled for Class 2 and Class 8 only (in case of a primary school, do class 2 only). If there is more
than one section for a class, then randomly choose any one. Write down the Class with whom these classes are
si ng.
2. Is there a usable black/white board in the class? Yes/No – write on the black/white board yourself to find out.
3. OBSERVE if children have their textbooks for at least of one subject. Ask the children to show English textbook
or that of Urdu to make a correct assessment.
4. Apart from the textbooks, OBSERVE if there is any other supplementary material (e.g. books, charts on the wall,
board games, etc.) in the room. Mark accordingly for each class you observe.
5. OBSERVE where the Class is si ng (room, verandah, outdoor) and fill accordingly.
6. Observe any ECE equipment (toys, ac vity material) and mark accordingly.
Request the Head Teacher to provide informa on on health and disability sec on and ck the relevant response op ons.
a) Do you have children with disability in your school?
b) If yes, how many in each type of disabili es (“visual”, “hearing”, “physical”, “intellectual”, “self-care”,
“communica on”) in the specific extent of disability (“some difficulty”, “a lot of difficulty”, “cannot do
at all”)? Ask for total number and gender wise informa on.
c) Do you have special facili es/personnel available? (Tick relevant op on from the listed facili es:
“ramps”, “accessible toilets”, “health and nutri on officer”, “trained support staff”, “assis ve devices
for hearing impaired”, and “transport facility”).
1. Request the Head Teacher to provide you informa on on teachers in the school. Collect and note down the
informa on on:
o Educa onal Levels i.e. Below Matric, Matric, FA/F.Sc, BA, B.Sc, MA/M.Sc, M.Phil , PhD or any other. Count
teachers for their respec ve highest educa onal level and men on the count in the respec ve boxes.
o Professional Qualifica on i.e. None, CT, PTC, B.Ed, M.Ed/MA.Ed, Others etc. Count teachers for their respec ve
professional qualifica ons and men on the count in the respec ve boxes.
Note: Total numbers of teachers must be equal to total number of appointed teachers.
Facilities in the School: (Sec on VII – Govt. School Sheet & Sec on VIII - Pvt. School Sheet)
No. of teachers who got training(s) recently: (Sec on VIII – Govt. School Sheet& Sec on VII – Pvt. School Sheet)
This requires you to note down the number of teachers who received (teacher) training in the previous year. Mark how long
ago the training was received i.e., “less than 15 days”, “15-30 days”, “more than 30 days”, or “none”.
Ask the head teacher regarding the topics of these trainings. Mark the relevant response op ons from among those
listed: “Pedagogy”, “School Leadership”, “Subject Specific Knowledge”, “Curriculum”, “Assessment”, “Community
Engagement”, “Classroom Management”, “Educa on and Technology” and “Others”. More than one response op on
can be selected.
Then, ask the head teacher regarding the training needs for teachers in the school. Then mark the relevant op on s from
among those listed: “Pedagogy”, “School Leadership”, “Subject Specific Knowledge”, “Curriculum”, “Assessment”,
“Community Engagement”, Classroom Management”, “Educa on and Technology”, “Data Literacy”, “Teacher
Leadership”, “Change Management”, and “Others”. More than one response op on can be selected.
Parent-teacher meeting: (Sec on IX - Govt. School Sheet & Pvt. School Sheet)
• How many mes in an academic year does the school organize parent-teacher mee ngs? Mark the relevant
response from among: “monthly”, “quarterly”, “semi-annually”, “annually”, and “none”?
• Does the teacher follow up with the parent in case of student absence?
• How many marked absences are allowed in a month? Choose from 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.
• Did the school remain closed due to any natural disaster within the last year? If yes, then for how many days?
• Record Name of Head Teacher/Principal, school phone number and Head Teacher’s/Principal’s mobile number.
• The Head Master should be requested to provide informa on for this sec on. In the absence of the Head Master,
ask Senior Most teacher OR the person who is in charge of the school to provide informa on for this sec on.
1. For this sec on, note down informa on for July 2022 to June 2023, and July 2023 to date.
2. Write down the name of the person who provided the informa on.
3. If the school gets any funds from Government/Private Individual/NGO You can write down the name of other
source of funds in the addi onal space given if there are any.
4. Ask if the school got a fund. If yes, then note down the amount and when this fund was received, write down
the month and year in which fund was received. If the person answering this sec on says that he/she is going
to receive the fund in the future, then mark “no”.
5. If the fund was received ask if the school has spent the en re fund? Yes, No, Do not know.
6. There are instruc ons under this sec on asking where the school fund was spent? Mark which is relevant.
7. Ask the person answering this sec on about the fund in a way that the person does not feel threatened or
uncomfortable. If the person refuses to answer or is hesitant to answer thi s sec on, then do not force the person
and move on to the next sec on. The remaining ques ons of this sec on should be le BLANK.
This sec on is similar to sec on IX other than the date by which you are required to record the informa on for school
fund. Record the informa on for school fund from July 2023 to date of survey.
School Fund Informa on: (Sec on XI and Sec on XII – Govt. School Sheet)
Below the fund sec on, also mark the relevant fields that inquire whether the fund was spend on u li es such as class
room construc on, school uniform, repair of computer etc.
Only for Private School Sheet
1. For this sec on, note down informa on for July 2022 to June 2023 and July 2023 to date of survey.
2. Write down the name of the person who provided the informa on.
3. If the school gets any funds from Government/ Private Individual/NGO, mark yes or no accordingly.
4. If the school has received funds, then note down the amount and when these funds were received i.e., month
and year. If the person answering this sec on says that he/she is going to receive funds in the future, then mark
“No”. Also write the name of the Department/Organiza on providing the funds.
5. If the school received a fund, then note down where that fund was spent or used.
6. Ask the person answering this sec on about the fund in a way that the person does not feel threatened or
uncomfortable. If the person refuses to answer or is hesitant to answer this sec on, then do not force the person
and move on to the next sec on. The remaining ques ons of this sec on should be le BLANK.
- Note the time of exit from the school.
ANNEXURE
175 ASER Pakistan 2023
ASER Pakistan 2023
Schools
Province Districts covered Villages covered Households covered
Govt Pvt Total
AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR 10 296 5,843 294 235 529
BALOCHISTAN 36 1068 21,273 1038 145 1183
GILGIT BALTISTAN 10 298 5,866 298 190 488
KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 34 962 20,357 1013 465 1478
PUNJAB 35 996 20,565 1001 623 528
SINDH 25 734 15,108 720 91 811
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
ICT 1 27 539 24 26 50
NATIONAL 151 4381 89551 4388 1775 5067
3-16 years children 5-16 years children 5-16 years children assessed
Province
Male Female Transgender Total Male Female Transgender Total Male Female Transgender Total
AZAD JAMMU AND
KASHMIR 5,987 5,813 291 12,091 5,675 5,281 76 11,032 5,194 4,766 62 10,022
BALOCHISTAN 34,270 29,864 700 64,834 29,332 25,314 650 55,296 23,270 18,275 500 42,045
GILGIT BALTISTAN 8,240 6,878 223 15,341 7,399 6,030 116 13,545 6,235 4,854 61 11,150
KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 27,109 16,245 134 43,488 24,387 14,303 130 38,820 20,891 10,627 100 31,618
PUNJAB 21,583 19,412 587 41,582 19,150 17,052 537 36,739 16,844 15,453 506 32,803
SINDH 19,443 14,447 22 33,912 17,093 12,445 21 29,559 14,607 10,172 15 24,794
ICT 704 585 0 1,289 604 486 0 1,090 506 416 0 922
NATIONAL 117336 93244 1957 212537 103640 80911 1530 186081 87547 64563 1244 153354
176
Facilitated by Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi
2023
Article: 25-A Right to Education
#ASER2023