UMN - Charles P Jones - Lecture 12 (20110927)

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

FIN221: Lecture 12 Notes

Chapters 21 and 22

Portfolio Management
Chapter 21 Charles P. Jones, Investments: Analysis and Management, Eighth Edition, John Wiley & Sons Prepared by G.D. Koppenhaver, Iowa State University

Portfolio Management
Involves decisions that must be made by every investor whether an active or passive investment approach is followed Relationships between various investment alternatives must be considered if an investor is to hold an optimal portfolio

Portfolio Management as a Process


Definite structure everyone can follow Integrates a set of activities in a logical and orderly manner Continuous and systematic Encompasses all portfolio investments With a structured process, anyone can execute decisions for investor

Portfolio Management as a Process


Objectives, constraints, and preferences are identified
Leads to explicit investment policies

Individual vs. Institutional Investors


Institutional investors
Maintain relatively constant profile over time Legal and regulatory constraints Well-defined and effective policy is critical

Individual investors
Life stage matters Risk defined as losing money Characterized by personalities Goals important Tax management is important part of decisions

Strategies developed and implemented Market conditions, asset mix, and investor circumstances are monitored Portfolio adjustments are made as necessary

Institutional Investors
Primary reason for establishing a longterm investment policy for institutional investors:
Prevents arbitrary revisions of a soundly designed investment policy Helps portfolio manager to plan and execute on a long-term basis
Short-term pressures resisted

Formulate Investment Policy


Investment policy summarizes the objectives, constraints, and preferences for the investor Information needed
Objectives
Return requirements and risk tolerance

Constraints and Preferences


Liquidity, time horizon, laws and regulations, taxes, unique preferences, circumstances

Life Cycle Approach


Risk/return position at various life cycle stages
Return B C Risk AA: Accumulation phase early career B: Consolidation phase mid-to late career C: Spending phase spending and gifting

Formulate Investment Policy


Investment policy should contain a statement about inflation adjusted returns
Clearly a problem for investors Common stocks are not always an inflation hedge

Unique needs and circumstances


May restrict certain asset classes

Formulate Investment Policy


Constraints and Preferences
Time horizon
Objectives may require specific planning horizon

Legal and Regulatory Requirements


Prudent Man Rule
Followed in fiduciary responsibility Interpretation can change with time and circumstances Standard applied to individual investments rather than the portfolio as a whole

Liquidity needs
Investors should know future cash needs

Tax considerations
Ordinary income vs. capital gains Retirement programs offer tax sheltering

ERISA requires diversification and standards applied to entire portfolio

Capital Market Expectations


Macro factors
Expectations about the capital markets

Rate of Return Assumptions


How much influence should recent stock market returns have?
Mean reversion arguments Stock returns involve considerable risk
Probability of 10% return is 50% regardless of the holding period Probability of >10% return decreases over longer investment horizons

Micro factors
Estimates that influence the selection of a particular asset for a particular portfolio

Rate of return assumptions


Make them realistic Study historical returns carefully

Expected returns are not guaranteed

Constructing the Portfolio


Use investment policy and capital market expectations to choose portfolio of assets
Define securities eligible for inclusion in a particular portfolio Use an optimization procedure to select securities and determine the proper portfolio weights
Markowitz provides a formal model

Asset Allocation
Involves deciding on weights for cash, bonds, and stocks
Most important decision
Differences in allocation cause differences in portfolio performance

Factors to consider
Return requirements, risk tolerance, time horizon, age of investor

Asset Allocation
Strategic asset allocation
Simulation procedures used to determine likely range of outcomes associated with each asset mix
Establishes long-run strategic asset mix

Monitoring Conditions and Circumstances


Investor circumstances can change for several reasons
Wealth changes affect risk tolerance Investment horizon changes Liquidity requirement changes Tax circumstance changes Regulatory considerations Unique needs and circumstances

Tactical asset allocation


Changes is asset mix driven by changes in expected returns Market timing approach

Portfolio Adjustments
Portfolio not intended to stay fixed Key is to know when to rebalance Rebalancing cost involves
Brokerage commissions Possible impact of trade on market price Time involved in deciding to trade

Performance Measurement
Allows measurement of the success of portfolio management Key part of monitoring strategy and evaluating risks Important for:
Those who employ a manager Those who invest personal funds

Cost of not rebalancing involves holding unfavorable positions

Find reasons for success or failure

Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted in Section 117 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the express written permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. Request for further information should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The purchaser may make back-up copies for his/her own use only and not for distribution or resale. The Publisher assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions, or damages, caused by use of these programs or from the use of the information contained herein.

Evaluation of Investment Performance


Chapter 22 Charles P. Jones, Investments: Analysis and Management, Eighth Edition, John Wiley & Sons Prepared by G. D. Koppenhaver, Iowa State University

How Should Portfolio Performance Be Evaluated?


Bottom line issue in investing Is the return after all expenses adequate compensation for the risk? What changes should be made if the compensation is too small? Performance must be evaluated before answering these questions

Considerations
Without knowledge of risks taken, little can be said about performance
Intelligent decisions require an evaluation of risk and return Risk-adjusted performance best

Relative performance comparisons


Benchmark portfolio must be legitimate alternative that reflects objectives

Considerations
Evaluation of portfolio manager or the portfolio itself?
Portfolio objectives and investment policies matter
Constraints on managerial behavior affect performance

AIMRs Standards
Minimum standards for reporting investment performance Standard objectives:
Promote full disclosure in reporting Ensure uniform reporting to enhance comparability

How well-diversified during the evaluation period?


Adequate return for diversifiable risk?

Requires the use of total return to calculate performance

Return Measures
Change in investors total wealth over an evaluation period
(V E - V B)/V B V E =ending portfolio value V B =beginning portfolio value

Return Measures
Dollar-weighted returns
Captures cash flows during the evaluation period Equivalent to internal rate of return Equates initial value of portfolio (investment) with cash inflows or outflows and ending value of portfolio Cash flow effects make comparisons to benchmarks inappropriate

Assumes no funds added or withdrawn during evaluation period


If not, timing of flows important

Return Measures
Time-weighted returns
Captures cash flows during the evaluation period and permits comparisons with benchmarks Calculate a return relative for each time period defined by a cash inflow or outflow Use each return relative to calculate a compound rate of return for the entire period

Which Return Measure Should Be Used?


Dollar- and Time-weighted Returns can give different results
Dollar-weighted returns appropriate for portfolio owners Time-weighted returns appropriate for portfolio managers
No control over inflows, outflows Independent of actions of client

AIMR requires time-weighted returns

Risk Measures
Risk differences cause portfolios to respond differently to market changes Total risk measured by the standard deviation of portfolio returns Nondiversifiable risk measured by a securitys beta
Estimates may vary, be unstable, and change over time

Risk-Adjusted Performance
The Sharpe reward-to-variability ratio
Benchmark based on the ex post capital market line

RVAR = [TR p RF]/SDp

=Average excess return / total risk Risk premium per unit of risk The higher, the better the performance Provides a ranking measure for portfolios

Risk-Adjusted Performance
The Treynor reward-to-volatilty ratio
Distinguishes between total and systematic risk

RVAR or RVOL?
Depends on the definition of risk
If total (systematic) risk best, use RVAR (RVOL) If portfolios perfectly diversified, rankings based on either RVAR or RVOL are the same Differences in diversification cause ranking differences
RVAR captures portfolio diversification

RVOL = [TR p RF ]/ p

=Average excess return / market risk Risk premium per unit of market risk The higher, the better the performance Implies a diversified portfolio

Measuring Diversification
How correlated are portfolios returns to market portfolio?
R2 from estimation of Rpt - RFt = p + p [RMt - RFt ] +Ept R2 is the coefficient of determination Excess return form of characteristic line The lower the R2, the greater the diversifiable risk and the less diversified

Jensens Alpha
The estimated coefficient in
Rpt - RFt = p + p [RMt - RFt] +E pt is a means to identify superior or inferior portfolio performance CAPM implies is zero Measures contribution of portfolio manager beyond return attributable to risk

If >0 (<0,=0), performance superior (inferior, equals) to market, risk-adjusted

Measurement Problems
Performance measures based on CAPM and its assumptions
Riskless borrowing? What should market proxy be?
If not efficient, benchmark error Global investing increases problem

Other Evaluation Issues


Performance attribution seeks an explanation for success or failure
Analysis of investment policy and asset allocation decision Analysis of industry and security selection Benchmark (bogey) selected to measure passive investment results Differences due to asset allocation, market timing, security selection

How long an evaluation period?


AMIR stipulates a 10 year period

You might also like