Solutions For Chapter 2
Solutions For Chapter 2
Solutions For Chapter 2
Course:
International Financial Reporting
&
Analysis
2023-2024
STUDY CASE 4
Non-current assets of Navigator
http://thenavigatorcompany.com/external/relatorio-de-contas-2022/docs/en/Navigator_RC_Digital_Final_ENG.pdf
Proposed answer:
a) Recoverability of goodwill then, note 3.1 says that most assumptions are related to the activity, namely, sales volumes, average
sales prices and variable costs used in projection periods (…)
b) Uncertainty over tax treatment then, notes 6.1 and 6.2 refers the excess/insufficiency of tax estimates, the favourable outcome
of some cases related to matters with high uncertainty, as well as requests for binding information, claims to the Tax
Administration and jurisprudence of the courts
c) Actuarial assumptions then, note 7.2 explains how the liability for Post-employment benefits is calculated
d) Biological assets then, note 3.8 indicates the productivity of the forest, the wood sale price, and other situations, namely, the
existence of an internal model to identify the fair value of the forest.
e) Provisions then, note 10.1, indicates that they are made in accordance with the risk assessments carried out internally by the
Group with the support of its legal advisers, based on the probability of the decision being favourable or unfavourable to the
Group
f) Useful life and depreciation of PPE then, note 3.3 explains that they use the best judgement of the Board of Directors for the
assets and businesses in question, also considering the practices adopted by companies of the sector at the international level
and the evolution of the economic conditions in which the Group operates (using also external independence experts)
2) The Navigator applies the same accounting police to investment properties, to property, plant and equipment
and to intangible assets. Do you agree? Could they use other accounting policies? Explain.
Proposed answer:
Yes, The Navigator applies the same accounting police to investment properties, to property, plant and equipment and to intangible assets; all them are
recorded at acquisition cost less depreciation and impairment losses, thus, they use the cost model (for subsequent measurement).
Proposed answer:
It is true.
New buildings for use in the production or for headquarters are PPE, thus, Note 3.3 details the acquisitions. They are null for
“Buildings and other constructions”
New buildings for capital appreciation or generation of income are Investment Property, thus, Note 3.4 details the acquisitions. They
are null for “Buildings and other constructions” as well.
4) How does Navigator treats the “subsequent costs” with equipment incurred after the acquisition? Explain the
effects in the financial statements.
Proposed answer:
a) Scheduled maintenance expenses are considered a component of the acquisition cost of PPE and are fully depreciated by the
next forecasted maintenance date.
b) All other repairs and maintenance costs are charged in the financial period in which they are incurred.
There is also mention to “Spare and maintenance parts”. Spare parts are depreciated from the moment they become available for use
and are assigned a useful life that follows the nature of the equipment, where they are expected to be integrated, not exceeding the
remaining useful life of these, and they are accounted for as property, plant and equipment if they are material and used for more
than one period, or if they are used only in relation to an item of property, plant and equipment. In other situations, spare parts are
accounted for as part of inventories and recognized in the period when consumed.
4) How does Navigator treats the “subsequent costs” with equipment incurred after the acquisition? Explain the
effects in the financial statements.
Proposed answer:
a) Scheduled maintenance expenses are considered a component of the acquisition cost of PPE and are fully depreciated by the
next forecasted maintenance date.
b) All other repairs and maintenance costs are charged in the financial period in which they are incurred.
There is also mention to “Spare and maintenance parts”. Spare parts are depreciated from the moment they become available for use
and are assigned a useful life that follows the nature of the equipment, where they are expected to be integrated, not exceeding the
remaining useful life of these, and they are accounted for as property, plant and equipment if they are material and used for more
than one period, or if they are used only in relation to an item of property, plant and equipment. In other situations, spare parts are
accounted for as part of inventories and recognized in the period when consumed.
5) What is the gross amount and the carry amount of PPE at the end of 2022?
Proposed answer:
6) Looking to investment properties, lands have the same carrying amount since December 2021, while buildings
have been decreasing. Why?
Proposed answer:
Because buildings are the only suffering impairment losses over time.
7) Most of the industrial property and other rights of Navigator is internally developed. True or false? Justify.
Proposed answer:
True (see Note 3.2). The amount in this category (industrial property and other rights) are not acquired, but we see the transfers from
work in progress to this category, thus, they are internally developed.
8) All the companies need to disclosure in Notes information that adds to, and complements, information
presented in the other financial statements. Based on the disclosures according with the accounting standards in
use by Navigator, critically analyse the content of Note 3.4.
Proposed answer:
Not applicable
?
yes
yes
yes
yes
Not applicable
Not applicable
yes
yes
Not applicable
Not applicable
NO
?
?
?
9) Assume…. Prepare the impacts non financial statements…
Proposed answer:
R:
Mainframe computers: assets definition, recognition criteria
At the initial recognition cost
2023:
Cost of FTA? 4.000+50.000+2.000+3.000+5.000 =64.000, drepreciable during useful life (8 years).
Depreciation in 2023 = 64.000/8 * 6/12m = 4.000
Em 2024:
Depreciation in 2024 = 8.000; or: (64.000-4000)/7,5 anos = 8.000
9) Assume…. Prepare the impacts non financial statements…
Proposed answer:
2025:
Revision of useful life, in 31/12/2024 for the next periods, from that moment propectively The remaining useful
lide turns to 4 years instead of 6,5 years
Depreciation in 2025: (64.000-4.000-8.000) / 4 years = 13.000€
2026:
Expenses to increase capacity capitalized add to FTA, and depreciate
AFT:+9.000€
Depreciation of this componente: 9.000/2years= 4.500
Depreciation of FTA (main componente) = (64.000-4.000-8000-13.000)/3 anos= 13.000
Expenses for maintenance (fix bugs) expenses imediately 6.000€
Impacts on the statement of financial position
…
SE:
Net profit for the period xxxxxx xxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
-1.000
-4.000 -8.000 -13.000 -6.000€
-13.000
-4.500
…
Liabilities:
Current payable… xxxxxx
+ 50.000 -50.000
…
Impacts on the cash flows statement
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Outflows: Property, xxxxxx -50.000 -9.000
plant and equipment -14.000
(…)
Depreciation, amortisation xxxxxx Xxx + (13.000)
and impairment losses in + (8.000) +(13.000) + (4.500)
non-financial assets + (4.000)
Proposed answer:
Qe= 204.678.247 vs FV=210.000.000 Surplus revaluation (other comprhensive income, shareholders equity)
= 5.321.753
At the end of the following year (31/12/2019) the new carrying amount of the FTA is depreciated, and part of
the revaluation surplus is transferred to retained earnings (a matter only required in the SNC, since NCRF 7
states that this transfer must be made, while IAS 16 states that it can be made). The amount of surplus
transferred will be the difference between depreciation based on the revalued carrying amount of the asset
and depreciation based on the original cost of the asset.
New depreciation of the year= 210,000,000 / 20 years = 10,500,000
Now, the annual depreciation if it had not been revalued would be = 204,678,247 / 20 years = 10,233,912.4
Then, the difference in depreciation will be = 266,087.6, and this is the amount to be transferred from the revaluation
surplus to retained earnings.
This value coincides with the transfer of this surplus during the remaining useful life, i.e. 5,321,753/20 years = 266,087.5
At the end of 2020,2021,2022, 2023 the same procedures are always done, with the same values (unless there is a
change in useful life or in residual value).
Attention:
The proposed solution is supported by the application of paragraph 35(b) of IAS 16. If 35(a) was applied, the
accumulated depreciation would have to be treated differently, not by eliminating against the cost, but by increasing it
proportionately. How?
Calculate index= 210,000,000/204,678,247= 1.026...
Increase accumulated cost and depreciation by 1.026 in return for the revaluation surplus
329,246,156x1,026...=337,806,747 increase of 8,560,590
533,924,403x1,026...=547,806,747 increase of 13,882,343
Proposed answer:
At the end of 2023, a new revaluation. At this time, Qe = 210,000,000 – 5x10,500,000=157,500,000, and the
revaluation surplus has a balance of 5,321,753-5x266,087.5=3,991,315.5
Simulations (example):
- if new FV is greater than 157,500,000 (Qe), do as previous process;
- if new FV is less than 157,500,000 (Qe), then:
This case has not a specific proposed solution. It is a real example of how different
accounting policies can influence and cause bias in ratio analysis
STUDY CASE 7 - PROPERTY INVESTMENTS &
FIXED TANGIBLE ASSETS
Proposed solution:
Proposed solution:
Does in-house developed software development project fulfill definition of asset? Do they meet the criteria for recognition
of an asset? Does it meet the definition of what an intangible asset is?
Web-base time keeping system: Managers have already identified what should be recognized as an expense and what
should be capitalized:
• Recognized as expense: 57,700
• Capitalized: Intangible asset, €100,000, subject to amortization for a period of 60 monthss
New module for e-mail reminder: Additional functionality with added benefits:
• Added to the value of the Intangible Asset initially recognized
• Capitalized at €22,438, subject to amortization over a period of 48 months
New module for enter date: Functionality not successfully achieved in a timely manner:
• Recognized as spent: 13,000
2 – Identify the amount at which the intangible asset is presented in financial statements and the amount of the expenses, in
2019-2021.
Proposed solution:
Proposed solution:
The 4G license is initially recognized as an intangible asset (because a license to use falls under contractual rights or other legal
rights, cf. one of the definitions of AI), at the time of its acquisition (2022:
Useful life? 8 years (period in which it is estimated to generate economic benefits)
Amortization in the 1st year? 200 million / 8 million = 25 million/year.
The decline in market performance is an indicator that the asset may be in impairment. A test must be performed. Thus, at the end
of the 1st year of operations, at the end of 2022:
With this procedure, the carrying amount of Intangible Assets decreases from 175 to 113.72 millions.
STUDY CASE 10 - BIOLOGICAL ASSETS OF
IZIDORO
Proposed solution:
Fair value at the beginning of the period: 100 animals aged 25 months and 50 with 7 months.
Fair value at the end of the period: 100 animals aged 37 months (the same, but now are cows and not younger), 50 calves with
19 months, and 30 new calves with 2 months
=100x800 + 50x750 + 30x550= 134.000
What to do at the end of the period? Increase biological asset by 39.000 while simultaneously recognising a fair value gain
directly in profit or loss (income statement).
Please note that in the NOTES, the information to be disclosed in accordance with IAS 41 is extensive, mainly related with
changes in physical and monetary aspects of the cattle.
STUDY CASE 11 – NON-CURRENT ASSETS
HELD FOR SALE
Proposed solution:
• The criteria of IFRS 5 are met on 31 April 20X4. The property is depreciated until the date of reclassification
(€300.000 × 4/12 = €100.000). Therefore, the carrying value is €13.900.000 (€14.000.000 − €100.000).
• On 31 March 20X4, the property is revalued to its fair value of €15.400.000. The revaluation increase of €1.500.000
is recognized in other comprehensive income (surplus revaluation).
• The value-in-use (€15.800.000) is greater than the fair value less costs to sell of €15.100.000 (€15.400.000 −
€300.000), therefore there is no impairment.
• The property is transferred to non-current assets held for sale at €15.100.000, with a loss of €300.000 recognized
in profit or loss (i.e. cost to sell).
• When the property is disposed of, a profit on disposal of €200.000 is recognized (net sale price is 15.300.000, ie,
15.600.000− 300.000, and the carrying amount is €15.100.000).
• A profit is recognized in 20x4, but no impact exist in cash flow statement.
• The remaining balance in the revaluation reserve may be transferred to retained earnings.
STUDY CASE 12 – PROVISIONS AND
CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
Proposed solution:
• So, in fact, for a large group of possible obligations, we weigh all possible outcomes by their associated probabilities. In the case of a single obligation,
the individual most likely outcome is taken as the best estimation.
Scenario B:
Based on the previous data, propose a value for the Provision to be recognized in the Liabilities as of December 31, 2020?
Proposed solution:
Liabilities
• *Assuming the company was ordered to pay the claimed lawsuit in 2022: use of provisions
• **The company created a provision for plaintiff damages in 2022: creation of provisions
• *** Reinforce provisions, and then use.
Proposed solution:
Income statement:
20x1 Impacts 20x2 Impacts 20x3
Proposed solution:
First, we need to calculate the lease liability (because we do not have the amounts calculated), and then the right-of-use
asset.
Lease liability present value of 9 instalments of 50.000/each, using an incremental interest rate of 5%/year.
The asset The Right-of-Use (ROU) is initially recognized by 420.391,08, and then is going to be amortized over 10 years
(the shorter between useful life and term contract; the company does not intend to renew the contract) each year,
decrease the asset and recognize amortization.
The liability The lease liability is initially recognized by 355.931,08, and then is going to be increased by the interests
every year and decreased by the lease payments every year.
At the initial recognition, the difference between the ROU and the lease liability is the payment made in cash at the initial
moment.
Thank you.