Impact of Social Media in The Workplace - Edited
Impact of Social Media in The Workplace - Edited
Impact of Social Media in The Workplace - Edited
Name:
Institution:
Course:
Tutor:
Date:
2
Social media has significantly changed the way people interact in the workplace since
social networking is becoming inevitable in daily routines. Private use of social networking
platforms at the workplace has recently become a controversial topic based on various legal
frameworks. Businesses are always on the lookout for technological opportunities that will give
them a competitive edge over their business rivals. Such technologies have reshaped the
workplace and such technologies will allow employees some private gains, such as checking
real-time sporting updates or making and receiving private calls, at their employer's expense.
Due to the positive and negative impacts of social media, proponents of its use in the workplace
argue that it promotes a company's marketing efforts while opponents argue that it reduces the
productivity of employees.
Social media can be a major source of distraction for many employees that already use
social media privately. Whenever a familiar message tone is heard at the place of work, thoughts
are distracted by the new message or there is a desire to look immediately. Recent studies
indicate that there is a loss of productivity because of social media usage at the place of work
(Mustajab et al., 2020). Productivity is reduced because of the constant checking and reviewing
of social media platforms, which can lead to a loss of valuable time and loss of focus. Instead of
performing different tasks simultaneously, the brain will change the focus of attention and tasks
will take twice as long to complete. Constant checking on social media often involves unfilled
free time, addiction, and laziness. Increased stress levels and nervousness, and lack of
concentration (Mustajab et al., 2020). Popular social media such as Facebook, Whatsapp, email,
3
Google, Instagram, YouTube, Twitter, and others take a lot of time for non-work-related
Social media has slowly gained its place in the workplace, which has changed employees'
mentality about their jobs. Due to the conciseness of communication through messaging
applications and Twitter, some employees do not see the need for extended meetings or work
schedules that require long, overlapping hours. Some employees do not see the value of
communicating face-to-face if they have the option to communicate quickly through short
written messages over the internet (Han et al., 2020). As a result, more workers are less patient
and demand flexible arrangements that are granted as long as they can fulfil their goals.
Communication between team members is adversely affected because everyone in the workplace
is becoming wired to receive instant gratification from instantly available messages and social
media connections (Han et al., 2020). Although the effects of social media in the workplace are
glaring, some employees think that it is possible to separate personal and professional life, which
Organizations are constantly trying to attract the best talent in the market by using social
media to improve their employer brand. The trend has been influenced by younger generations of
workers that use social media to research companies they are interested in working for. In turn,
organizations commit to an online presence to maintain visibility and online interaction to attract
top talent (Tanwar & Kumar, 2019). Organizations maintain visibility on social media because
people want to work for popular organizations and employers they can verify and trust.
Organizations try to earn the trust of prospective workers by defining organizational culture and
goals that can be differentiated from competitors and keep employees engaged. Companies can
4
use tools that potential employees turn to when checking job opportunities such as Facebook,
LinkedIn, Twitter, Blogs, and career websites. According to Tanwar & Kumar (2019), the
messages in such platforms should have consistent messaging that connects with different
audience groups. Social media allows companies to show prospective employees what life is like
in their organizations through interviews, case studies, and videos. Through social media, a
company can interact with people who are interested in working for them and connect them with
Security And Image Risks Involved With The Use Of Social Media
There are hackers and people with malicious intent that are actively using social media to
exploit security loopholes that can be used to steal information and disrupt business operations.
Businesses are constantly under attack for their data, trade secrets, and other sensitive business
information (Soomro & Hussain, 2019). Employee use of social media is exploited to hack into
secure systems, which makes the use of popular social media platforms risky for business
operations. Hackers use malicious applications, scams, social network issues, untrained
employees, and a lack of social media policies to gain unwanted access to sensitive information.
Most security breaches involve cases where employees do not know how to protect themselves
adequately against social media threats (Soomro & Hussain, 2019). Security breaches occur
because it is impossible to monitor the actions of every employee and some organizations have a
Companies that allow their employees to use social media in the workplace are always at
risk of destroying their brand reputation. Security breaches from social media that result in the
loss of customer data will have negative consequences on a brand image because of loss of
consumer trust and loss of business. In the past, big companies have lost consumer data to
5
hackers and were forced to pay fines and compensate some of their customers and suffered more
losses due to negative brand reputation (Soomro & Hussain, 2019). Customers want to be
associated with companies that can guarantee the security of their personal information. Social
media results in an increasing amount and complexity of data available and low control over the
social media environment (Soomro & Hussain, 2019. It is almost impossible for a brand to
manage its image on social media if people do not associate the brand with positive outcomes.
Since social media has many loopholes that can be exploited by malicious agents,
companies can use alternatives such as collaboration and communication platforms and
can be tailored according to organizational needs and ensure that all activities that require
collaboration are completed without risking information leakage (Buchal & Songsore, 2019).
Since the COVID-19 pandemic, some work processes can be done remotely without ever having
to show up physically in the office. As such, the collaboration and communication platforms
allow a workplace to include remote working and increased reliance on technology without the
risk of revealing sensitive information on social media. Such platforms can help employees
separate their professional and personal life and organizations can increase their security by
issuing company devices with pre-installed programs that can only be accessed with confidential
especially when there is a need for employee collaboration in real-time (Buchal & Songsore,
2019). Such alternatives can reduce dependence on social media and reduce the risk of security
breaches.
Social media will become an important tool in the workplace as more people continue
using social networking platforms in their daily activities and the content will be more
personalized. There will be vast amounts of data available to everyone and data collected from
social media will be used for major business decisions. More job seekers will use social media
to look for job opportunities because more than half of people today trust information from a
personal connection in their social network (Muninger et al., 2019). The future of job recruitment
will be on social media as more organizations continue turning to social media for talent
recruitment. Some hiring decision-makers in major organizations are unlikely to hire job seekers
without a social media presence. Most work will be completed online as the number of remote
jobs and workers continues to increase. When newer generations that were raised on social
media begin flooding the job market, companies will need to meet them where they feel most
Conclusion
There are negative and positive effects on the use of social media in the workplace that
either advocate or oppose its use in organizations. Social media is not an ideal tool for employees
because it reduces productivity and negatively impacts the mindset of employees. Companies
can use social media to promote organizational culture and goals and attract prospective
employees by guiding their employer brand through social media. Social media can lead to
security breaches that can negatively affect brand image if there is a loss of sensitive information
such as customer personal information. Organizations have the alternative of using collaboration
and communication platforms and video conferencing to reduce their reliance on social media
for workplace communication. Social media will be an integral part of any company that wants
7
to attract employees in the future because the newer generations that were brought up on social
References
Buchal, R., & Songsore, E. (2019). Using Microsoft Teams to support collaborative knowledge
Han, R., Xu, J., Ge, Y., & Qin, Y. (2020). The impact of social media uses on job burnout: The
Muninger, M. I., Hammedi, W., & Mahr, D. (2019). The value of social media for innovation: A
Mustajab, D., Bauw, A., Rasyid, A., Irawan, A., Akbar, M. A., & Hamid, M. A. (2020). Working
from home phenomenon as an effort to prevent COVID-19 attacks and its impacts on
work productivity. TIJAB (The International Journal of Applied Business), 4(1), 13.
Security and image risks involved with the use of social media
Soomro, T. R., & Hussain, M. (2019). Social Media-Related Cybercrimes and Techniques for
Tanwar, K., & Kumar, A. (2019). Employer brand, person-organisation fit and employer of
choice: Investigating the moderating effect of social media. Personnel Review, 48(3),
799-823.