Juris - Environ
Juris - Environ
Juris - Environ
the conference. The Stockholm Convention was held in Sweden from June 5-16, 1972. The
object behind this convention was to “create a basis for comprehensive consideration
within the United Nations of the problems of the human environment,” and to “focus the
attention of Governments and public opinion in various countries on the importance of the
problem.”
At the end of the convention 26 principles were adopted and declared by the participating
states. This is known as the Magna Carta of the human environment.
Before Brundtland
Ten years after the 1972 United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, a number
of global environmental challenges had not been adequately addressed.
The Brundtland Commission, formerly the World Commission on Environment and
Development, was a sub-organization of the United Nations (UN) that aimed to unite
countries in pursuit of sustainable development. appointed Gro Harlem Brundtland,
former Prime Minister of Norway, as chairperson of the commission. Brundtland was
chosen due to her strong background in the sciences and public health.
This commission gave the strong definition of sustainable development to the world and
that it has three pillars to make a strong environment.
The use of the term strict liability has been questioned by the lawyers because it
was made redundant in India by the Supreme Court in 1987.
Background
The Supreme Court, in the M.C. Mehta vs Union of India 1987, found strict
liability principle inadequate to protect citizens’ rights and replaced it with the
absolute liability principle.
This judgement came on the Oleum gas leak case of Delhi in 1986.
The court found that strict liability which was evolved in an English case
called Rylands versus Fletcher, 1868, provided companies with several
exemptions from assuming liability.
Absolute liability, on the other hand, provides them with no defence or
exemptions and is part of Article 21 (Right to Life).
The court wanted corporations to be made fully liable for future undeserved
suffering of innocent citizens and held that a hazardous enterprise has
an absolute non-delegable duty to the community.
The ‘polluter pay’ principle essentially holds the polluter liable for the pollution caused to
the environment. The polluter is liable for every damage caused to the environment. So
according to the ‘polluter pay principle’, the polluter has to not only compensate the victims
of pollution but also compensate for the restoration of environmental degradation.
Therefore, the polluter bears the cost of health hazard caused to the public as well as the
cost of restoration of the environment. In other words, the costs of the measures should
reflect on the cost of the goods and services, the production and/or consumption of which
led to pollution.
In India, the ‘polluter pays principle’ was for the first time applied and defined in the 1996
case of Indian Council of Enviro-Legal Action vs Union of India. In this case, Justice Dalveer
Bhandari determined that reversing the imbalance caused to the ecology is the part and
parcel of the industrial process. Thus, the financial responsibility of taking prevention and
controlling measures for the pollution caused should rest upon the industry which caused
pollution. The financial burden cannot be shifted to the shoulders of the government
neither in preventing nor in correcting the dent.
The Taj Trapezium Case/ M.C. Mehta vs Union of India and Ors, 1996
The sulphurdioxide emitted by the Mathura Refinery and the industries when combined
with Oxygen - with the aid of moisture - in the atmosphere forms sulphuric acid called
"Acid rain" which has a corroding effect on the gleaming white marble. The apex court
reiterated the ‘polluter pays principle’ and emphasized the need of application of the
principle. The yellowing and decaying of the priceless national monument, the Taj Mahal,
was a matter of concern in this case. According to the report of the National Environment
Engineering Report Institute and Varadarajan Committee in 1990 and 1995 respectively, the
foundries, chemical industry and Mathura refineries were the major polluters of the Taj
Mahal. The court ordered the industries to switch to gas from fuel or shift their location of
work. The industries which did not comply with orders, those industries were shut down
unconditionally. Justice Kuldeep Singh added a new dimension to the ‘polluter pays
principle’. He stated that the workers of the industries should suffer as a result of closure or
shifting of location. The workers were ought to be given compensatory benefits in the form
of residential accommodation, continuity of their job till the industry restart etc. Since then
the courts have time and again have emphasized that the rights and duties of the workers
cannot be compromised with. This incident was a watershed in the history of environmental
law management.
Precautionary Principle
The precautionary principle requires that, if there is a strong suspicion that a certain activity
may have environmentally harmful consequences, it is better to control that activity now
rather than to wait for incontrovertible scientific evidence.
The Precautionary Principle shifts the burden of proof on the shoulders of the person who is
arguing that the activity he is carrying out is not harmful. The principle follows the approach
of being safe than being sorry. This principle is in contrast to the wait-and-watch approach
which is generally followed in environmental issues.
Earth Summit (1992)/ The United Nations Conference on Environment And Development
(UNCED)
Some of the major achievements of Earth Summit lie in the form of following documents
which it produced :
2. Agenda 21: A comprehensive blue print for global actions to affect the transition to
sustainable development.
4. Two legally binding conventions, i.e. The Convention on Climate Change and
Convention on Biodiversity, which are aimed at preventing global climate change and the
eradication of biologically diverse species. These conventions were signed by
representatives of more than 150 countries.
Agenda 21
In Agenda 21 there is hardly any guidance on how its recommendations should actually be
implemented. However, Agenda 21, in spite of its shortcomings, provides the post-Rio world
with a starting point. It also embodies the important theme that concerted action and
shared responsibility by developed and developing nations are crucial in addressing the
linkage between development and environment.
(3) Forest Principles:- They are set of non-legally binding authoritative principles to support
the sustainable management of forests worldwide. Forests play a very important role in
development as well as in preserving the ecology.
The world community at Rio Conference showed unanimity on two aspects, i.e., to prevent
global climate change and eradication of biologically diverse species. Accordingly, two
legally binding Conventions, Le, the "Convention on Climate Change" and "Convention on
Biodiversity" were signed by the representatives of more than 150 counties. The first
Convention on climate change requires the States to take steps to reduce their emissions of
gases believed to contribute to global warming.
The findings of the first IPCC Assessment Report of 1990 played a decisive role in leading to
the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), which was opened
for signature in the Rio de Janeiro Summit in 1992 and entered into force in 1994. It
provides the overall policy framework for addressing the climate change issue.
The stated aims of the IPCC are to assess scientific information relevant to:
The Assessment Reports, the first of which had come out in 1990, are the
most comprehensive evaluations of the state of the earth’s climate.
o Every few years (about 6-7 years), the IPCC produces assessment
reports.
Over the years, each assessment report has built on the work of the previous
ones, adding more evidence, information and data.
First Assessment Report:- The IPCC first assessment report was completed in 1990, and
served as the basis of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
(UNFCCC).
Main issues were, increasing the atmospheric concentrations of the greenhouse gases,
resulting on average in an additional warming of the Earth's surface. They calculate with
confidence that CO₂ has been responsible for over half the enhanced greenhouse effect.
2. Emissions of greenhouse gases and aerosols due to human activities continue to alter the
atmosphere in ways that are expected to affect the climate.
4. There is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over the past 50
years is attributable to human activities.
5. Human influences will continue to change atmospheric composition throughout the 21st
century.
Fourth Assessment Report:- The Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) was completed in early
2007. Like previous assessment reports, it consists of four reports, three of them from its
working groups.
• Most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th
century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic (human) greenhouse
gas concentrations.
• Anthropogenic warming and sea level rise would continue for centuries due to the
timescales associated with climate processes feedbacks, even if greenhouse gas
concentrations were to be stabilized although the likely amount of temperature and sea
level rise varies greatly depending on the fossil intensity of human activity during the next
century. And that :
2. There is a confidence level >90% that there will be more frequent warm spells, heat
waves and heavy rainfall.
3. There is a confidence level >66% that there will be an increase in droughts, tropical
cyclones and extreme high tides.
Both past and future anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions will continue to contribute to
warming and sea level rise for more than a millennium.
Global atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide have
increased markedly as a result of human activities since 1750 and now far exceed pre-
industrial values over the past 650,000 years. 35
Fifth Assessment Report (AR5):- The atmosphere and ocean have warmed, the amounts of
snow and ice have diminished, sea level has risen, and the concentrations of greenhouse
gases have increased. It is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant
cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century.
Due to global warming, the global temperature is rising which is leading to adverse
climate change ultimately. Greenhouse gases such as methane, nitrous dioxide and
carbon dioxide are responsible for global warming and carbon dioxide is one of the
major contributor.
The continuous warming of climate will increase the frequency and severity of
several extreme events such as a change in rainfall, the risk for human life, and will
affect livelihoods, coastal settlements, infrastructure, ecosystems and economic
stability in low-lying coastal areas.
The average increase in the temperature of the Earth’s surface has been 0.85
degrees Centigrade (°C). The global shoot up of temperature has induced changes in
rainfall pattern which is ultimately altering freshwater systems, affecting the quality
and quantity of water availability.
The excess amount of the energy (30%) is retained by the ocean which is ultimately
resulting in ocean warming, acidification and rise in sea level due to melting of ice
and snow in the Arctic region.
It is evident from the report that species and ecosystem have been adversely
affected by greenhouse gases, the productivity and nutrient percentage have fallen
down to great extent.
The climate change is going to increase the cost of living as it will increase the heat
days and problem dengue, malaria will persist a lot, and there will a significant
increase in human life loss.
This was the foundation of UNFCCC’s Paris Agreement.
6th Assessment
Recently, the United Nations’ climate science body, the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) published the third part of its Sixth Assessment Report (AR6).
The first part of this report, on the physical science of climate change was
published in 2021. It had warned that 1.5 degree Celsius warming was likely to
be achieved before 2040 itself.
This second part of the report was published in March 2022 which
was about climate change impacts, risks and vulnerabilities, and adaptation
options.
o This emissions growth has been driven mainly by CO 2 emissions from the
burning of fossil fuels, industrial sector, as well as methane emissions.
o But the average annual rate of growth slowed to 1.3% per year in the
period 2010-19, compared to 2.1% per year in the period 2000-09.
o At least 18 countries have reduced GHG emissions for longer than 10 years
on a continuous basis due to decarbonisation of their energy system,
energy efficiency measures and reduced energy demand.
The Convention on Climate Change entered into force on 21st March, 1994. The Conference
of the Parties to the Convention (COP) became the Convention's ultimate authority.
The Convention on Climate Change sets an overall framework for intergovernmental efforts
to tackle the challenge posed by climate change. It recognizes that the climate system is a
shared resource whose stability can be affected by industrial and other emissions of carbon
dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
COP27- Egypt
The United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, also known as "Rio+20," was
held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil in June 2012, twenty years after the historic Rio Earth
Summit of 1992. World leaders and thousands of attendees from the commercial sector,
NGOs, and other organizations gathered at the Rio+20 Conference to discuss how
to eliminate poverty, enhance social equity, and assure environmental protection on a
planet that is getting more congested.
The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act was enacted in 1974 to provide for the
prevention and control of water pollution, and for the maintaining or restoring of
wholesomeness of water in the country.
The Act was amended in 1988. The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Cess Act was
enacted in 1977, to provide for the levy and collection of a cess on water consumed by
persons operating and carrying on certain types of industrial activities.
This cess is collected with a view to augment the resources of the Central Board and the
State Boards for the prevention and control of water pollution constituted under the Water
(Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974. The Act was last amended in 2003.
The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), statutory organisation, was constituted in
September, 1974 under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974. Further,
CPCB was entrusted with the powers and functions under the Air (Prevention and Control of
Pollution) Act, 1981.
Why was the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act of 1981 passed?
The effects of climate change caused by all forms of pollution became all too apparent in the
early 1970s. To mitigate their harmful effects it was believed that nations would need to
pass their own laws. Thus during the United Nations General Assembly on Human
Environment held in Stockholm in June 1972, a resolution was passed which implored the
nations of the world to preserve natural resources such as air.
India itself had issues regarding air pollution due to a wide variety of factors such as stubble
burning, improper industrial practices, environmental factors etc. To combat these factors a
special law was enacted under the Constitution of India, which was the Air (Prevention and
Control of Pollution) Act of 1981.
India’s original Constitution did not contain any provision for the protection of the natural
environment. However, the Fundamental Duties, which were added by the 42nd
Amendment to the Constitution, prescribed the protection of the environment including
forests, lakes, rivers and wildlife as a duty of the citizens of the country.
This amendment also added new Directive Principles of State Policy, one of which was
Article 48A, which directed the State to protect and improve the environment and to
safeguard forests and wildlife.
The chief aims and objectives of the Environment Protection Act, 1986 are listed below.
The EPA empowers the Centre to “take all such measures as it deems necessary” in the
domain of environmental protection.
Under the law, it can coordinate and execute nationwide programmes and plans to
further environmental protection.
It can mandate environmental quality standards, particularly those concerning the
emission or discharge of environmental pollutants.
This law can impose restrictions on the location of industries.
The law gives the government the power of entry for examination, testing of
equipment and other purposes and power to analyse the sample of air, water, soil or
any other substance from any place.
The EPA explicitly bars the discharge of environmental pollutants in excess of
prescribed regulatory standards.
There is also in place a specific provision for handling hazardous substances, which is
prohibited unless in compliance with regulatory requirements.
The Act empowers any person, apart from authorised government officers, to file a
complaint in a court regarding any contravention of the provisions of the Act.
The Wildlife Protection Act, 1972
This Act provides for the protection of the country’s wild animals, birds, and plant species, in
order to ensure environmental and ecological security. Among other things, the Act lays
down restrictions on hunting many animal species. The Act was last amended in the year
2006. An Amendment bill was introduced in the Rajya Sabha in 2013 and referred to a
Standing Committee, but it was withdrawn in 2015.
Article 48A of the Constitution of India directs the State to protect and improve the
environment and safeguard wildlife and forests. This article was added to the Constitution
by the 42nd Amendment in 1976.
Article 51A imposes certain fundamental duties for the people of India. One of them is to
protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers, and wildlife
and to have compassion for living creatures.
Forests are an important resource that nature can bestow upon mankind. Therefore, it is
the duty of every citizen to preserve the ecosystems of forests. But due to rapid
deforestation, the cycle of nature is itself being disrupted. Therefore, the need to bring
about a law to ensure the preservation of forest was needed.
One of the first legal drafts to protect forest tracts was the Indian Forest Act, 1865 replaced
by a 1927 version of the same act. However, it was more geared towards protecting the
commercial interests of the British Empire in India.
The aim of the Forest is to preserve the forest ecosystem of India by fulfilling the following
objectives:
1. Protect the forest along with its flora, fauna and other diverse ecological
components while preserving the integrity and territory of the forests.
2. Arrest the loss of forest biodiversity
3. Prevent forest lands being converted into agricultural, grazing or for any other
commercial purposes and intentions.
With the establishment of the NGT, India became the third country in the
world to set up a specialised environmental tribunal, only after Australia and
New Zealand, and the first developing country to do so.
In 2012 Almitra H. Patel vs. Union of India case, NGT gave judgment of
complete prohibition on open burning of waste on lands, including landfills –
regarded as the single biggest landmark case dealing with the issue of solid
waste management in India.
In 2013 in Uttarakhand floods case, the Alaknanda Hydro Power Co. Ltd. was
ordered to compensate to the petitioner – here, the NGT directly relied on the
principle of ‘polluter pays’.
In the Save Mon Federation Vs Union of India case (2013), the NGT suspended
a ₹6,400-crore hydro project, to save the habitat of a bird.
In 2015, the NGT ordered that all diesel vehicles over 10 years old will not be
permitted to ply in Delhi-NCR.
In 2017, the Art of Living Festival on Yamuna Food Plain was declared violating
the environmental norms, the NGT panel imposed a penalty of Rs. 5 Crore.
The NGT, in 2017, imposed an interim ban on plastic bags of less than 50-
micron thickness in Delhi because “they were causing animal deaths, clogging
sewers and harming the environment”.