SF/PUR/08

Rev. No: 01 / Date: 0410'|12023

Nos.: +91 282222 1595

: 1st Floor, Ajanta Complex, Guest House Road, Morbi - 363641
Name : Mr. Vishal Patel MD/CEO Cont No. : +91 9687 68 5575
Names: (i) (ii) (iii)
Names:(i) (ii) ( iii)

Mr. Amit Bhalodia I + 91 9687 68 5575

Mr. Anit Singh | + 91 9687 68 5575
Contact Names & Nos - Delivery: Mr. Pankaj Patel | + 91 9687 68 5575
REVIEW OF PREVIOUS AUDIT

PURCHASING DATA
1. Do you have SF Purchase order for all items?

C-2. Have you submitted PPAP for all parts to SF and received approved
PSWfrom SF ?

C-3 Do you get schedule from SF in advance ?

C-4 Have you received External Provider rating from SF ?

Comparision of drawing status with P.O.

INCOMING MATERhL CONTROL

1. Do you check material test certificate w.r.t. Quality Plan / Control Plan ?

Are incoming parts/Raw material identified with proper tags?

D4. Do you communicate to SF for any shortage,damage / deterioration of SF

supplied material ?

D-5. Whether FIFO method is followed for SF supplied material? lf yes, how?

O-!. Oo you have lncoming inspection plans for materials & records there of ?

7. ls rejected material identified and kept separately ?

D-8; Are samplhlg plans being followed?

D-9 ls raw material verified periodically from recognised laboratory?

E. PROCESS CONTROL
E-1, Do you have SF approved process flow chart & control plans for all parts
?
E-2. Whether all control plans are updated for any changes in process
?
E-3. Whether all necessary work instructions to carry out the process are
 dffi\ SF/PUFYOS
Lw:.j Supplier Audit Checksheet
Rev. No: 01 / Date: 0410112023
sll,trsrlx"rn*THrns
E-5. ls there a system of first piece approval w r t control plan and records
NA
there off ?
E-6. ls there a system of in-process inspection as per control plan in every
2
shift and records there of ?
E-7. Whether product identification system is defined, documented and
3
followed ?lf yes,how'?

E-8. Are rejected items identified and kept separately ? 3

E-10. ls there a system for approved sample updation as well as

NA
implementation of modification or engineering changes ?

E-1 1. ls there any evidence of effective communication system from External

NA
Provider to SF for every modification.

E-12. ls there die history card system and maintained ? 3

E-13 Are drawings & standards Available & properly controlled ? NA

F. CALIBRATION
F-1. ls there a master list of gauges / inspection fixtures & instruments? 3

F-2. Whether all IMTE (lnspection,measuring & test equipment) is used for
3
inspection are calibrated as per defined frequency ?
F-3. Whether permissible inaccuracy is defined for all IMTEs? 3

F-4. Are they calibrated from NABL? 3

F-5. Are calibration history cards available? 3

G. SPECIAL PROCESSES

G-1. ls process qualification carried out ? 3

G-2. Are there trained people for these special processes ? (See Quality
NA
Record)
G-3. ls control on sub-contractors exercised, if special processes are
NA
offloaded ?
H. STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL

H-1 . Have you idenfied special characteristics in control plan ? NA

H-2. Has SPC study been carried out for special characterisics as per conkol
NA
olan ?

H-3. Has training on SPC techniques been acquired ? NA

I. NON CONFORMANCE

1. ls record for non-conformance available ? 2

I-2. What is the level of ppm for internal rejection ? ls corrective & preventive
2
action taken on such recurrence ?
l-3. How do you communicate process rejection to SF & corrective action
2
lhere of?
l-4-ls there a system for customer complaint handling and corrective actions 2
lor closing the complaint ?
J. FINISHED PRODUCT QUALITYAUDIT
J-1. Whether the inspection reports are prepared based on checklist prior to 3
Cespatch to SF as per quality Plan?

J-2. Whether the records for final inspection are maintained ? 3

J-3.Whether the details of rework / rejection is communicated to SF along with t

corrective and preventive actions whenever reworked / rejected lots are NA
despatched toSF ?
 f&
LrSI
-',w -d Supplier Audit Checksheet
SF/PUR/08
$utr$Itx rtraTfxIBS Rev. No: 0't / Date: 0410112023

K. OTHER POINTS
K-1 . ls housekeeping maintained properly with adequate lighting arrangement
3
to perform the production process?

K-2. ls adequate material storage system provided to avoid damage and

3
Jeterioration of the products ?

K-3. ls material handling system capable to avoid the handling damages ? 3

K-4. ls there plan for preventive maintenance of key equipments & for SF dies
3
rnd its implementation ?
K-5. ls there a system to avoid component deterioration during transportation
2
?

K-6. ls product surface coating and preservation satisfactory? NA

K-7. Does mode of packing and despatch assure damage free supplies? 3
K-8. Do you submit raw material accounting statements as per defined
3
frequency ?
K-9 How many parts are pending more than 180 days for closing of 57 f(4) to
NA
SF?
L. INTERNAL QUALITY AUDIT
L-1 . Do you carry out lnternal Quality Audit ? 3

L-2. Check record of NCs and verify corrective actions 3

M. PRODUCT QUALITY AUDIT

M-1. lnspect few items for critical parameters and attach the report separately. 3

(ln case final product is not available, inspect in-process item as per process
plan / control plan ) 3

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TARGET DATE

3
4
5

o
Sign Auditor / Date Sign Auditee / Date Sign HOD (VD)/Date Sign (MR) / Date

GUIDELINES FOR GRADING

GRADING IN THE EVENT OF
0 THE QUALIry SYSTEM IS ABSENT
I THE QUALITY SYSTEM IS DEFINED IN THE MANUAL BUT NO ACTION IS INITIATED
2 THE QUALITY SYSTEM IS PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED
3 THE QUALITY SYSTEM IS PERFECTLY INSTALLED AND NO MODIFICATION / IMPROVEMENT IS SUGGESTED
wHENEVER ELEMENT tS NOT APPLTCABLE tNDtCATE UNDER COLUMN - NA (NOT AppLtCABLE)

ADD UP ALL THE GRADING POINTS & CALCULATE THE PERCENTAGE OF SCORE ( DO NOT INCLUDE NOT APPLICABLE POINTS )
> 85% THE QUALITY SYSTEM IS EXCELLENT - KEEP IT UP

IF JHE SCORE IS
75-84% THE QUALITY SYSTEM IS GOOD BUT LITTLE MORE EFFORTS ARE REQUIRED
65 -74% .
THE QUALITY SYSTEM IS AVERAGE NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
< 64 o/"
THE QUALITY SYSTEM IS POOR - MUST IMPROVE
t