A Merger Refers To The Consolidation of Two Existing

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8

A merger refers to the consolidation of two existing, independent companies into a

new, singular legal entity. It occurs when two companies join forces voluntarily to
form a new company, often of similar size and scope, with the aim of reducing
competition, increasing market share, introducing new products or services,
improving operations, and ultimately driving more revenue5. Mergers are strategic
business deals that allow companies to grow, expand into new markets, reduce costs,
improve management, and increase revenue by combining their resources and
strengths5.

what are the benefits of a merger for companies

Ans Mergers offer several benefits to companies, including:


1. Increased market share: Mergers result in a larger market share for the new
company, enabling it to gain a competitive edge and potentially reduce
competition24.
2. Economies of scale: Mergers allow companies to achieve cost savings and
lower average costs by increasing output, leading to lower prices for
consumers24.
3. Economies of scope: Mergers can lead to reduced production costs for one
product due to the production of another related product, enabling cost
savings that may be impossible to achieve through organic growth3.
4. Competitive edge in the market: Mergers result in greater financial strength,
leading to higher market share, more influence over customers, and reduced
competitive threat3.
5. Access to the best talent: Larger companies have better access to top talent,
as talented employees are attracted to big names2.
6. Access to resources: Mergers can improve access to materials, suppliers, and
tangible resources, particularly when one company acquires or merges with
one of its suppliers to improve production cycles and guarantee access to
critical resources3.
7. Diversification of risk: Mergers allow companies to spread risk across different
revenue streams by diversifying products, services, and prospects for the
business3.
8. Cost-effective alternatives for facilities: Mergers present a cost-effective
alternative to starting from scratch, as setting up production centers, buying
machinery and equipment, building storage places, and initiating distribution
channels are costly3.
9. Access to new markets: Mergers can save companies significant time, effort,
and money compared to starting from scratch, particularly when entering
international markets3.
10. Opportunist value generation: Mergers can allow larger organizations to
acquire companies experiencing financial distress at a lower purchase price,
enabling them to reap benefits such as proprietary rights to products,
increased market growth, penetration in new geographic regions, and more3.
11. Enterprise continuation: Mergers can ensure business continuity, reduce
interruptions in operations, and provide job security for employees,
particularly in cases where there is no clear succession plan for a small or
privately-owned business3.
However, it's important to note that the success of a merger depends on several
factors, such as the compatibility of the companies' cultures, the ability to achieve
synergies, and the potential for economies of scale4.

Here are some examples of successful mergers and acquisitions in recent years:
1. Verizon and Verizon Wireless (2014): Verizon bought the stake of Vodafone
in Verizon Wireless for $130 billion, making it the biggest deal of 2014 and the
decade. This deal allowed Verizon to gain full control over one of the largest
wireless carriers in the world3.
2. Dow and DuPont (2016): The merger of Dow Chemical Co. and DuPont was
completed at $130 billion in 2016, creating one of the largest chemical
companies in the world. The combined company, DowDupont, later split into
three independent, publicly-traded companies3.
3. Anheuser-Busch InBev and SAB Miller (2016): Anheuser-Busch InBev, the
world's largest beer maker, acquired SAB Miller for more than $100 billion in
2016. This deal created a beer industry giant, with a presence in more than 50
countries3.
4. Royal Dutch Shell and BG Group (2016): Royal Dutch Shell bought British
BG Group for $53 billion in 2016, making it the second-largest energy
company in the world. This acquisition helped Shell to bolster its position in
the oil and natural gas market3.
5. Saudi Aramco and SABIC (2019): Saudi Aramco obtained 70% of the stakes
in Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (SABIC) for $69.1 billion in 2019. This
deal was significant in the chemical industry and helped Saudi Aramco to
diversify its portfolio3.
6. Praxair and Linde AG (2018): Praxair Inc. merged with the Linde Group in
2018 to create a new company with a broad range of products and enhanced
geographical reach. The new company invested around $85.5 billion in the
new entity3.
7. Microsoft and Nuance (2021): Microsoft acquired Nuance Communications,
a leading provider of conversational AI and ambient clinical intelligence
solutions, for $19.7 billion in 2021. This deal helped Microsoft to strengthen its
position in the healthcare AI market5.
8. Microsoft and Activision Blizzard (2022): Microsoft announced its
acquisition of Activision Blizzard, a leading video game company, for $68.7
billion in 2022. This deal is expected to help Microsoft to expand its gaming
portfolio and strengthen its position in the gaming industry5.
These examples illustrate the strategic benefits of mergers and acquisitions, such as
increased market share, diversification of risk, access to new markets, and cost
savings through economies of scale and scope. However, successful integration of
the merging companies is crucial for the success of the deal. This requires strong
leadership, careful evaluation of cultural differences, and a balance between speed
and thoroughness during the negotiation process2.

The types of mergers include:


1. Horizontal merger: Involves two companies operating in the same market
and selling similar products or services. An example is if McDonald’s and
Burger King joined forces1.
2. Vertical merger: Occurs between two companies in the same industry but at
different stages of production. For instance, a retailer merging with a
wholesaler, like eBay and PayPal1.
3. Congeneric merger: Involves companies with different products or services
but operating in the same market and selling to the same customers. An
example is Exxon and Mobil1.
4. Conglomerate merger: Takes place between companies with completely
unrelated business activities. An example is Mars (chocolate bars) and
Wrigleys (chewing gum)1.
5. Market-extension or product-extension merger: In a market-extension
merger, companies in the same industry join forces to expand market reach,
while a product-extension merger involves adding a specific product to the
acquirer's product line3.
6. Reverse Mergers: Reverse mergers, also known as reverse takeovers, occur
when a private company merges with a public company, with the private
company becoming the controlling entity. This type of merger is less common
but can be a strategic move for companies seeking to go public2.

what is a horizontal merger and how does it


work
A horizontal merger is a merger between two companies that operate in the same
industry and offer similar products or services145. The goal of a horizontal merger is
to increase market power, further utilize economies of scale, and exploit merger
synergies3. By combining the operations of two direct competitors, the new entity
can achieve cost savings, improve efficiency, and gain a competitive advantage in the
market14.Horizontal mergers can lead to increased market share, reduced
competition, and higher prices for consumers1. However, regulators often scrutinize
these mergers to ensure that they do not create monopolies or significantly reduce
competition in the market1.Examples of successful horizontal mergers include the
merger between HP and Compaq in 2011, which created a global technology leader
valued at over US$87 billion3. Another example is the merger between Exxon and
Mobil in 1999, which created one of the largest oil and gas companies in the
world1.In summary, a horizontal merger is a merger between two companies that
operate in the same industry and offer similar products or services. The goal of a
horizontal merger is to increase market power, further utilize economies of scale, and
exploit merger synergies. These mergers can lead to increased market share, reduced
competition, and higher prices for consumers, but they are subject to regulatory
scrutiny to ensure that they do not create monopolies or significantly reduce
competition in the market.

Acquisition

Acquisition refers to the act of acquiring or gaining possession of something, often


to add to things that one already has. In a business context, acquisition typically
refers to the purchase of another company or part of a company, as well as the
process of acquiring goods, services, or works from an external source2. Acquisition
can also refer to the right to sell or publish something, such as a particular work or
work by a particular author, that is bought or obtained by a company or
person3. Acquisition is a common corporate strategy for expanding a business,
entering new markets, or acquiring new technologies2. The acquisition process
involves various stages, including identifying potential targets, conducting due
diligence, negotiating terms, and integrating the acquired business into the acquiring
company2. Acquisitions can be financed through various means, including cash,
stock, or debt financing2. Acquisition.com is a website that provides resources and
education for founders looking to scale their businesses through acquisition5.

The acquisition process typically involves the following steps:


1. Develop an acquisition strategy: This involves setting a clear goal for the
acquisition, such as tax advantages, use of surplus funds, lower cost of start-
up, or elimination of competition. The acquiring company should also
consider the type of synergies they hope to achieve, such as horizontal or
vertical acquisition.
2. Establish the search criteria for the opportunity to be acquired: This
involves identifying the key criteria that potential companies should have,
such as management, geography, treasury, business areas, international
expansion, and elimination of competition.
3. Search for potential targets: This involves identifying potential targets that
meet the search criteria. This can be done through the knowledge of
competitors, professional advisors, industry associations, or online databases.
4. Planning the transaction: This involves contacting one or more companies
that meet the search criteria and conducting due diligence to ensure that the
target company is a good fit.
5. Negotiation: This involves negotiating the terms of the acquisition, including
the price, payment structure, and any conditions that need to be met.
6. Due diligence: This involves conducting a thorough investigation of the
target company to ensure that there are no hidden liabilities or issues that
could affect the acquisition.
7. Letter of Intent: This involves writing a letter of intent (LOI) outlining the
terms and conditions of the deal, including conditions of payment.
8. M&A Due Diligence: This involves conducting a thorough audit or
investigation of the target company, its operations, human capital, tax and
legal structure, and its financials.
9. Purchase and sale contract: This involves putting an informed purchase
contract to the target company based on the information gained during due
diligence.
10. Integration: This involves integrating the target company into the acquiring
company, which can be a complex and time-consuming process.
These steps may vary depending on the specific circumstances of the acquisition, but
they provide a general framework for the acquisition process. It is important to note
that the integration process is often overlooked but is a critical task to reaching a
“business as usual” goal. Post-merger compliance is also a critical and complex series
of activities that should not be overlooked.

Unit 3
Q - Discuss the techniques of takeover defense with appropriate examples
ChatGPT
ChatGPT
Takeover defense techniques are strategies employed by target companies to resist or deter
hostile takeover attempts by potential acquirers. These techniques are aimed at protecting the
interests of the company's shareholders, management, and other stakeholders. Here are some
common takeover defense techniques along with examples:

1. Poison Pill: A poison pill is a shareholder rights plan that allows existing shareholders to
purchase additional shares at a discount in the event of a hostile takeover, diluting the
ownership stake of the acquirer and making the takeover less attractive. One classic
example of a poison pill is the case of Airgas, Inc. In 2010, Airgas adopted a poison pill
after rejecting a hostile takeover bid from Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. The poison pill
helped Airgas fend off the hostile takeover attempt and negotiate a higher acquisition
price.
2. Golden Parachutes: Golden parachutes are contractual agreements between a company
and its executives that provide lucrative compensation packages, including cash bonuses,
stock options, and other benefits, in the event of a change in control or acquisition of the
company. These agreements are designed to incentivize executives to remain with the
company and resist takeover attempts. An example of a golden parachute arrangement is
the case of Yahoo! Inc. In 2008, Yahoo! adopted severance agreements with its
executives, including then-CEO Jerry Yang, in response to a hostile takeover bid from
Microsoft Corporation.
3. White Knight: In a white knight defense, the target company seeks a more favorable
acquisition offer from a friendly third-party acquirer, known as the white knight, to thwart
the hostile takeover bid from the original acquirer. An example of a white knight defense
is the case of Cadbury plc. In 2010, Cadbury successfully defended against a hostile
takeover attempt by Kraft Foods Inc. by accepting a higher acquisition offer from
Mondelēz International Inc., which acted as a white knight.
4. Staggered Board: A staggered board, also known as a classified board, is a corporate
governance structure in which directors are divided into multiple classes with different
terms, making it more difficult for an acquirer to gain control of the board through a
single proxy contest. By limiting the number of directors up for election in any given year,
staggered boards can delay or deter hostile takeover attempts. One example of a
staggered board defense is the case of Facebook, Inc. Facebook's board of directors is
structured with three classes of directors, each serving staggered three-year terms,
making it challenging for activist investors to gain control of the board.
5. Litigation and Regulatory Hurdles: Target companies may pursue legal action or
regulatory intervention to delay or block hostile takeover attempts on grounds such as
antitrust concerns, breach of fiduciary duty, or inadequate disclosure. Litigation and
regulatory hurdles can create uncertainty and additional costs for the acquirer, making
the takeover less attractive. An example of litigation as a takeover defense is the case of
PeopleSoft Inc. In 2004, PeopleSoft sued Oracle Corporation to block its hostile takeover
bid on antitrust grounds. The legal battle prolonged the takeover process and ultimately
resulted in Oracle increasing its acquisition offer.

These are just a few examples of takeover defense techniques used by target companies to resist
hostile takeover attempts. Each defense strategy has its advantages and limitations, and the
effectiveness of these techniques depends on various factors such as the specific circumstances
of the takeover bid, the motivations of the acquirer and target company, and regulatory
considerations.

EXPLAIN briefly the various regulations of SEBI takeover code 2011


ChatGPT

The SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India) Takeover Regulations, 2011, commonly known
as the SEBI Takeover Code or Takeover Regulations, govern the acquisition of shares and
takeover of control of listed companies in India. These regulations aim to ensure transparency,
fairness, and protection of the interests of shareholders and other stakeholders in the context of
corporate takeovers. Here's a brief overview of the key regulations under the SEBI Takeover Code:
1. Open Offer Requirements: The SEBI Takeover Code mandates that any person or entity
acquiring shares or voting rights exceeding certain thresholds must make an open offer
to acquire additional shares from the public shareholders of the target company. The
open offer must be made at a price determined in accordance with the regulations and
must comply with specified conditions regarding minimum offer size, offer price, and
timelines.
2. Thresholds for Open Offer: The regulations specify various thresholds triggering the
obligation to make an open offer, including the acquisition of shares or voting rights
exceeding 25%, 50%, and 75% of the voting rights in the target company. Different
thresholds apply to acquisitions through a negotiated deal, market purchases, or
preferential allotments.
3. Competitive Bidding Process: In case of competing bids for the acquisition of shares or
voting rights in a target company, the SEBI Takeover Code provides for a competitive
bidding process to determine the highest offer price. This process ensures fair treatment
of shareholders and maximizes shareholder value.
4. Disclosure Requirements: The regulations impose stringent disclosure requirements on
acquirers, target companies, and other relevant parties involved in corporate takeovers.
These disclosures include details of the acquirer's shareholding, acquisition strategy,
financing arrangements, and any other material information affecting the transaction.
5. Prohibition on Creeping Acquisitions: The SEBI Takeover Code restricts creeping
acquisitions by existing shareholders, preventing them from acquiring additional shares
or voting rights in the target company beyond specified thresholds without triggering an
open offer requirement.
6. Regulation of Non-Compete Fees: The regulations govern the payment of non-
compete fees or agreements between the acquirer and the promoters or key
management personnel of the target company. Non-compete fees are subject to strict
disclosure requirements and approval by shareholders.
7. Exemptions and Relaxations: The SEBI Takeover Code provides for certain exemptions
and relaxations from the open offer requirements in specific circumstances, such as intra-
group transfers, acquisitions under debt restructuring schemes, and acquisitions by
government bodies or statutory authorities.
8. Regulatory Oversight and Enforcement: SEBI, as the regulatory authority, oversees
compliance with the Takeover Regulations and has the authority to investigate violations,
impose penalties, and take enforcement actions against non-compliant parties.

Overall, the SEBI Takeover Regulations, 2011, play a crucial role in regulating corporate takeovers
and ensuring transparency, fairness, and investor protection in the Indian securities market. These
regulations provide a comprehensive framework for the conduct of takeover transactions and
contribute to the integrity and efficiency of the capital markets.

Ques - WHAT IS DUE DILIGENCE ?discuss why due diligence is important throwing some light on
the failed mergers and acquisitions.
ChatGPT
ChatGPT
Due diligence is a comprehensive investigation or examination conducted by a prospective buyer
or investor to assess the financial, legal, operational, and strategic aspects of a target company
before entering into a merger, acquisition, investment, or other significant transaction. The
purpose of due diligence is to gather relevant information, identify potential risks and
opportunities, and make informed decisions to mitigate risks and maximize value.
Here's why due diligence is important in the context of mergers and acquisitions, illustrated by
examples of failed mergers and acquisitions:

1. Identifying Risks and Liabilities: Due diligence helps uncover hidden risks, liabilities,
and contingencies that may impact the value or viability of the target company. For
example, in the case of the failed merger between Hewlett-Packard (HP) and Autonomy
Corporation, due diligence revealed significant discrepancies in Autonomy's financial
statements and accounting practices, leading to allegations of accounting fraud and
impairing HP's ability to integrate the acquisition effectively.
2. Assessing Financial Performance: Due diligence enables prospective buyers to assess
the target company's financial performance, including revenue, profitability, cash flow,
and assets and liabilities. In the case of the merger between AOL and Time Warner,
inadequate due diligence failed to uncover the declining performance of AOL's core
business, leading to overvaluation and subsequent write-downs, impairing the financial
health of the combined entity.
3. Understanding Operational and Strategic Fit: Due diligence helps evaluate the
operational and strategic fit between the acquirer and the target company, including
synergies, integration challenges, and cultural compatibility. For instance, in the case of
the failed merger between Daimler-Benz and Chrysler Corporation, due diligence
revealed significant cultural differences, management conflicts, and operational
challenges that undermined the integration process and eroded shareholder value.
4. Complying with Regulatory Requirements: Due diligence ensures compliance with
regulatory requirements, including antitrust laws, industry regulations, and legal and
contractual obligations. For example, in the proposed merger between AT&T and T-
Mobile USA, due diligence uncovered regulatory concerns related to market
concentration and competition, leading to opposition from antitrust authorities and
ultimately resulting in the termination of the merger agreement.
5. Managing Reputational Risks: Due diligence helps manage reputational risks by
uncovering any adverse information or controversies associated with the target company,
its management, or its business practices. For example, in the case of the failed merger
between Enron Corporation and Dynegy Inc., due diligence revealed accounting
irregularities, governance failures, and ethical lapses at Enron, leading to public scrutiny,
loss of investor confidence, and the collapse of the merger deal.

In summary, due diligence is crucial in mergers and acquisitions to mitigate risks, uncover value
drivers, and make informed decisions. Failure to conduct thorough due diligence can lead to
costly mistakes, financial losses, regulatory challenges, and reputational damage, as illustrated by
examples of failed mergers and acquisitions. Therefore, companies should prioritize due diligence
as an essential step in the M&A process to enhance the likelihood of successful transactions and
value creation for stakeholders.

You might also like