Rasa Theory
Rasa Theory
Rasa Theory
He
says to cloud:
The above-quoted sloka gives us the idea how poetry is made effective with the help
of apt diction and imaginative language. When we read any
good piece of literature, we get pleasure as a reader or when watch a play on the
stage, we derive certain kind of pleasure from the scenes enacted
on the stage. This kind of pleasure according to Indian poetics is called ‘rasa.
The word ‘rasa’ actually means ‘essence’ or ‘sap’ but here it can be taken
as aesthetic pleasure, poetic delight or poetic relish.
What is ‘Rasa’?
Rasa at one time meant ‘water’, ‘juice’ or ‘wine’. At another time it implied
‘essence’. In another context it meant ‘relish’ or ‘savouring’. There was a
time when it indicated the primary constituents of medicine. It also meant
‘aesthetic pleasure’ or ‘enjoyment’ – a meaning or association of meanings
with which we are essentially concerned.
The theory of rasa is attributed to Bharata, a sage-priest who may have lived
sometime between the 1st century BCE and the 3rd century CE. It was
developed by the rhetorician and philosopher Abhinavagupta (c. 1000), who applied
it to all varieties of theatre and poetry. The principal human
feelings, according to Bharata, are delight, laughter, sorrow, anger, energy,
fear, disgust, heroism, and astonishment, all of which may be recast in
contemplative form as the various rasa-: erotic, comic, pathetic, furious, heroic,
terrible, odious, marvelous, and quietistic. These rasas comprise the
components of aesthetic experience. The power to taste rasa is a reward for merit
in some previous existence.
Bharata, the great rhetorician has tried to explain how this aesthetic pleasure
takes place. He has tried to give the theory of ‘rasa’ in one sutra
(aphorism). He says:
This means that rasa develops from the blending of vibhava, anubhava and
vyabhichari. It manifests itself when the sthayibhava, the emotion of the
reader is correlated with the following three aspects presented in a piece of
creative literature (i) excitant (ii) ensuing response and (iii) transitory
feelings.
These three should be combined into one. Many theoreticians have tried to explain
the above mentioned aphorism in different way.
Vhibhavas
They are the situations which are responsible to bring out Sthaibhavas. Vhibhavas
have two aspects- Alambana and Uddipana. The person in whose mind Sthaibhavas run
is
known as Allambana Vibhavas.
The moonlit, spring, soft breeze, fragrance of flowers are Uddipanana Vhibahavas.
In other words, they are stimuli.
Anubhavas
They are their effect seen upon the character after the emotions arise in the
actor(s). They make spectators feel or experience Abhinaya by words and gestures.
Vyabhikaribhavas
They are the transitory and temporary mental states.
They strike mind and become the cause of experiencing a permanent mood.
They are 33 in numbers. Some of them are a weakness, depression, anxiety, despair,
etc.
They spring out of principal emotion and ultimately merge into it.
They are like waves and bubbles that appear and disappear as the mighty stream of
dominant emotion flows on, smiling and replying and dancing.