Purus Artha
Purus Artha
Purus Artha
Contents
3.0 Introduction
3.1 Concept of Varna
3.2 Concept of Caste (Jati)
3.3 Difference between Varna and Caste
3.4 Theory of Purushartha
3.5 Theory of Ashrama
3.6 Concept of Karma
3.7 Concept of Rina
3.8 Summary
3.9 References
3.10 Answers to Check Your Progress
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
3.0 INTRODUCTION
India exhibits a remarkable range of ethnic, linguistic, religious, regional,
economic, caste and class diversities in every facet of its societal life. All
these divisions are sharpened due to the widening gap between traditions and
modernity, rural and urban, between gender identities etc. The traditional
Indian society exhibits certain basic features having theological
underpinnings of Hindu religion. The fabric of traditional social structure in
Indian context is woven around the ideas of rebirth (punarjanam),
immortality of soul (aatma), karma (deed), merit (punya), morality (dharma)
and salvation (moksha). Social interdependence is the central theme of Indian
society. Right from the birth, people belong to certain social groups like jati,
gotra, kula or vansha, varna and feel a sense of belongingness to these
*
Contributor: Dr. Kalyani Sahal, Guest Faculty, Department of Sociology, Delhi School of
38 Economics, University of Delhi.
groups. Social stratification and hierarchy is the another important theme Structure and
Nature of Indian
which is evident in Indian social structure. Social System
This unit focuses on understanding the concept of varna and jati/ caste and
their inter-relations. In order to comprehend the Indian social structure it is
necessary to have a clear understanding of twin concepts that explain
hierarchy and ranking in society.
In this unit, we will also learn about the scriptural and textual understanding
of the fundamental principles of Hinduism – Purushartha, ashrama, karma,
rina that govern and regulate the social structure in Indian context. It is
important to understand these concepts so that one can develop a better
understanding of the social fabric of which one is also a very integral part.
There is a deep sense of attachment to these basic principles of Hinduism.
Betille (1996) “caste is now represented much more typically as jati, or its
equivalent in the regional language”. Terms like jat, samaj, biradari are
equivalent terms of jati and used in different regions of India. It is important
for us to understand both the concepts of Varna and caste and their inter-
relations to have a clear picture of India social structure.
Dube (1990: 52) pointed out that Varna is not a functional unit in case of
Indian society but serves as a reference category. It acts as a “classificatory
device” in which several jatis of ascribed ritual status are placed together in a
hierarchical order.
Let us look at the theories of origin of Varna system. It was believed that the
Aryan invasion into India leads to four fold division of Indian society.
Herbert Risley proposed that Aryan society was divided into four groupings
and this varna system was brought in India with them. As the word ‘varna’
means colour, so, it was aimed to differentiate between fair skinned Aryans
and dark skinned Dasas (the original inhabitants of India). It implies that
there were only two groups in Indian society – Aryans and non-Aryans. Later
on Aryans got divided into three varna – Brahaman, Kshatria, Vaishya while
Dasas become Shudra, the fourth varna.
The third is the tri guna theory of varna origin. Guna refers to inherent
quality of an individual. There are three basic guna which are found in the
personality of each individual. But only one guna becomes predominant and
thus becomes the marker of his personality. The three guna are – sattva guna,
raja guna and tama guna.
Interestingly, the four varna groupings did not enjoy any ascribed status
during Vedic times. Vishnu Purana states that everyone is born as Shudra. It
is only one’s karma that entitles one to become a Brahmin or Khastriya or
Vaishya. Therefore, it implies that varna system was not a closed system and
inter-varna mobility was possible during Vedic times. Moreover, Shudras
were not untouchables but rather a conglomeration of artisan castes at that
time.
1) Name the three theories that explain the origin of Varna system in India.
……………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………
40
…………………………………………………………………………… Structure and
Nature of Indian
Social System
……………………………………………………………………………
The features of hierarchy and occupation are interlinked for a caste. Castes
involved in clean professions (belonging to upper three varnas) also have
hierarchically higher status as compared to the lower castes (belonging to the
fourth varna) who have been involved traditionally in polluting profession.
Occupations dealing in the bodily fluids, leather and cadavers are considered
polluted.
The principle of purity and pollution governed the relations between different
castes. It also served the basis for determining the hierarchy of castes.
Therefore, the more pure the caste is, higher is its status and place in social
hierarchy. There were certain means mentioned in the Hindu scriptures to
attain the purity. For example, reading holy Hindu texts (Vedas and
Upnishadas), meditating, practicing abstinence (Brahmacharya), teetotalism,
vegetarianism, non-violence, undertaking pilgrimage etc. Louis Dumont in
his widely acknowledged work Homo Hierarchicus (1970) presented the
most systematic approach to study caste. According to him, Brahmins and
untouchables represent the opposition between pure and impure. This
ideology of purity and impurity is the root cause of hierarchy. He suggests
that specialization in the occupations that are considered impure over the
generations lead to perpetual impurity. For example the cobbler who is
traditionally engaged in dealing with leather becomes untouchable
permanently.
41
Structural Basis of
Indian Society 3.3 DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VARNA - CASTE
Very often both the terms are used interchangeably. But the distinction
between these two is of great importance to anthropological understanding of
Indian social structure. Both represent forms of social stratification of Indian
society. Let us consider the main distinction between the concepts of caste
and varna:
• Varna system has theological sanctions but caste system does not
have. As mentioned earlier in the theory of divine origin of varna
system, it has theological underpinnings of Hinduism. Lord Krishna also
mentioned in the Bhagwad Gita about the creation of four varnas from
four different body parts of the primeval being or Prajapati Brahma. On
the contrary, caste system does not have any divine sanctions. Caste
system can be considered as the degenerated version of varna system
over the centuries. It implies that caste system originated from the varna
system. Swami Vivekanad says “in religion there is no caste…the caste
system is opposed to the religion of Vedanta” (cit. in Kumar et al, 2015).
42
3.4 THEORY OF PURUSHARTHA Structure and
Nature of Indian
Social System
The theory of Purushartha determines the values ascribed to human actions
and behaviour. It is a measuring scale to determine whether certain human
actions are permissible or not in a particular society. The term ‘Purushartha’
is a composite Sanskrit term and composed of two separate words ‘Purusha’
+ ‘Artha’. The word ‘Purusha’ denotes ‘human being’ and the word ‘Artha’
means ‘objective of life’. So etymologically speaking the term ‘Purushartha’
implies ‘meaning of human life’ or ‘object of human pursuit’. It is a major
key concept of the Hindu philosophy that guides the human lives and
provides meanings and aims to his purpose in the life.
There are four goals of human life namely Dharma, Artha, Kama and
Moksha. These are discussed briefly as follows:
• Dharma – This is the first and foremost goal of human life. The term
‘Dharma’ is derived from Sanskrit root word ‘Dhri’ which means ‘to
hold together or to preserve’. So, the social significance of ‘Dharma’ is
to maintain social order and stability as highlighted in various classical
Hindu texts. It is characterized by righteousness and strict adherence to
moral and religious values by the individuals and society in general. It is
meant for the welfare of the society by bringing the harmony between
mundane and spiritual affairs of the individuals.
• Artha – This is the second goal of the human life. The word ‘Artha’
means the material and economic aspects of human life. It is
characterized by focus on attainment of economic values and prosperity
by the human beings. As per the Hindu philosophy, fulfillment of
economic and material needs is important in order to achieve the overall
well being of an individual. Artha is a broader concept as per the
Hinduism. It encompasses career, skill, wealth, prosperity and means of
fulfilling the needs of life while following the principle of Dharma.
Artha is essential for the maintenance of dharma in the society. As
having means of wealth enables the individual to perform various duties
to uphold dharma and maintain social harmony.
• Moksha – The fourth and last goal of human life is moksha. The term
moksha is derived from Sanskrit root ‘muc’ which means ‘let go’ or ‘set
free’. It is characterized by attainment of salvation, liberation and
fulfillment of spiritual aspirations of human beings. It is meant for self-
realization and understanding the ultimate purpose of human life that is
43
Structural Basis of mukti . The release from sufferings involved in every birth form is
Indian Society
known by the terms ‘moksha’/ ‘nirvana’/ ‘mukti’ as per the Hindu
philosophy. Moksha is considered the most important purushartha. The
remaining three are considered the only means to attain the end in itself
which is the last pursuit of human life i.e. moksha.
As per the Hindu philosophy, all the four Purushartha have their relevance
and significance in human life. There is inherent conflict between active
pursuit of wealth (Artha) and pleasure (Kama) and renunciation of all wealth
and pleasure for the sake of spiritual liberation (Moksha). Scholars point out
the relevance of ‘action with renunciation’ or ‘craving free dharma driven
action’. In case of conflict, dharma is more important as compared to artha
or kama. If dhama is ignored then attainment of artha (wealth) and kama
(pleasure) will lead to social tension and disruption. The relative value of
three Purushartha is as follows: Artha is more important and precedes Kama
and Artha is preceded by Dharma. The focus is on coordination of material
desire and spiritual life. Course of life of an individual is determined by the
doctrine of Purushartha.
……………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………
1) Brahmacharya Ashrama – The very first stage during which the boy
undergoes Upanayan ceremony or sacred thread ceremony (initiation
44 rite). Individuals belonging to upper caste or twice born castes (dwija)
are allowed to go through sacred thread ceremony. The Shudras or Structure and
Nature of Indian
untouchables were not allowed to go through the same as they were not Social System
allowed to receive education traditionally. The chief duty of the
individual is to seek education and learning of Vedas. The other duties
include living in residence of teacher or gurukul, practicing celibacy,
following life of austerity and service. This Ashrama lasts usually till 25
years of age.
4) Sanyas Ashrama: The last phase of human life begins after 75 years. He
removes all of his worldly ties and breaks off all the relations. He is
expected to devote his entire time for meditation and concentration
towards Param Brahma. The main aim is to attain salvation or moksha in
this ashrama. In the nutshell, Ashrama dharma is not only social in its
implications but it emphasises renunciation of the world in the
Vanprastha and Sanyas ashrama.
……………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………
Chakraborty (2014) writes “the doctrine of karma implies that, every soul
embodied in a human being has the will to make decisions and choose what
actions to take. Those decisions and actions generate karma.”
Theory of karma is based on the principle of cause and effect. It provides for
the causal explanation of life. It bridges the past to the present. The concept
of karma is closely linked with the doctrine of rebirth and salvation. Rebirth
refers to cycle of reincarnation through which all life forms undergoes until
they attain salvation. Good actions and intentions lead to good karma and
future happiness. While bad deeds and intentions lead to bad karma and
sufferings. The law of karma is not restricted to life time of one’s individual
but transcends all his life forms on this earth. One may not immediately see
the effects of his action in near future but he will definitely face the
consequences sometime later in this life or may be in the next life. ‘You reap
as you sow’ – this principle is the basis of karma. In the nutshell, karma acts
as a store of both good and bad actions accumulated over many lives.
The Satpatha Brahmana (written in about 800 B.C.) mentions three types of
Rina which are as follows:
1) Deva Rina – as the name indicates this is the debt incurred to the gods.
2) Pitri Rina – this is the debt incurred to the ancestors or Purvaj who act
as protectors of the individual and his family.
3) Rishi Rina – this is the debt incurred to the teachers or Guru for
imparting the knowledge and wisdom to the individual e.g. story of
Eklavya who sacrificed his thumb in the form of guru dakshina on the
demand of Guru Dronacharya.
Apart from these three main types of Rinas, there is one more Rina called
Manushya Rina. It refers to the debt to fellow beings. It is associated with the
concept of charity and philanthropy. It focuses on the principle of paying
back to the society for its welfare.
3.8 SUMMARY
Caste is unavoidable reality of Indian society. Caste can be understood from
different perspectives like textual perspective and field based understanding
of caste. In this unit, we narrowed our focus on understanding the scriptural
or textual perspective of caste and varna system. It is evident that caste and
varna are not mutually exclusive categories but there exist an overlap
between these two. It is not possible for Jati system to operate without the
broader divisions of varna based labour system. This is not to say that caste
system is not changing in the modern times. Anthropologists have tried to
understand the changing inter-relations of caste in Indian society through
various ethnographic studies post 1950s. This will be discussed at length in
the next unit.
3.9 REFERENCES
Beteille, A. (1996). Varna and Jati. Sociological Bulletin, 45(1).
47
Structural Basis of Chakraborty, P. (2014). The Law of karma and salvation. International
Indian Society
Journal of Humanities and Social Science Studies, 1(3):193-195. Accessed
from http://oaji.net/articles/2014/1115-1417595573.pdf
Dube, S.C. (1990). Indian Society. New Delhi: National Book Trust.
48