Kahan Et Al, 2019 Commentary

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

COM M E N TA RY

Cannabis industry and medical


cannabis clinics need regulation
Meldon Kahan MD CCFP FRCPC Anita Srivastava MD MSc CCFP Sarah Clarke PhD

D
uring the 2017-2018 fiscal year, the number of cannabis improves PTSD symptoms among veterans.4
Canadians authorized to receive medical canna- However, these studies are not reflective of the wider
bis (ie, products derived from the cannabis plant, body of literature. A recent systematic review7 of sys-
as opposed to the pharmaceutical cannabinoids nabilone tematic reviews, clinical trials, and observational stud-
and nabiximols) increased from 174 503 to 296 702, and ies with control groups identified 2 systematic reviews
that number continues to climb.1 In this commentary, we and 3 primary studies on cannabis and PTSD. Both sys-
argue that the evidence for the therapeutic benefits of tematic reviews8,9 concluded that there was insufficient
medical cannabis is very limited, and that this evidence evidence to draw any conclusions about the efficacy of
is misrepresented by the medical cannabis industry. We cannabis in PTSD treatment. One of the 3 primary stud-
further argue that the lack of regulation and oversight of ies, a retrospective cohort study of more than 2000 US
medical cannabis clinics by Health Canada has allowed veterans who were assessed before and after attending
clinicians to prescribe unsafe doses. We comment on the residential treatment for PTSD, found that those who
influence that the medical cannabis industry has had on started or continued using cannabis had worse PTSD
the public’s perception of cannabis and consider the effect symptoms, more violent behaviour, and greater alcohol
that this influence has within the context of legalization. use compared with those who never used or stopped
Finally, we outline strategies that family physicians can using cannabis.10 In the other 2 studies, cannabis use
use to protect their patients from the harms of cannabis. was not associated with severity of PTSD symptoms.11,12
Another review of cannabis and PTSD concluded that
Evidence of benefit for medical cannabis
Advocates claim that cannabis is effective for a variety of marijuana use has been linked to … depression, anxi-
medical and psychiatric conditions; however, the only con- ety, psychosis, and substance misuse. Marijuana use
ditions for which cannabis has credible evidence of ben- is also associated with worse treatment outcomes in
efit are neuropathic pain, spasticity from multiple sclerosis, naturalistic studies .… Known risks of marijuana thus
palliative care, and chemotherapy-induced vomiting.2 currently outweigh unknown benefits for PTSD.13
In spite of a lack of supporting evidence, the medical
cannabis industry commonly makes exaggerated claims A broader literature review shows that the evidence for
about the therapeutic benefits of cannabis. A website cannabis as a treatment for PTSD is far from conclusive,
belonging to a chain of cannabis clinics provides a list of indicating that the cannabis company’s claim about recent
“common conditions treated with cannabis” that includes studies showing promise4 is misleading and disingenuous.
several conditions that have little to no evidence and Furthermore, when considering the evidence for medi-
for which clinical guidelines do not recommend the cal cannabis, it is important to distinguish pharmaceutical
use of cannabis. These conditions include back pain, cannabinoids from other preparations: cannabis advo-
headaches, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder cates tend to equate the benefits and safety of medical
(PTSD).3 To take PTSD as an example, medical cannabis cannabis with that of pharmaceutical cannabinoids, yet
has been promoted as a viable treatment without a rea- the 2 have different effectiveness profiles. Evidence for
sonable body of evidence behind its use. A prominent medical cannabis is far weaker than for the pharmaceuti-
medical cannabis company states the following: cal cannabinoids nabiximols and nabilone, in part because
of the difficulty of designing a trial of sufficient quality for
We’ve heard from a number of our patients that suffer inhaled cannabis. In a systematic review of cannabinoids
from PTSD that medical cannabis is very effective at for neuropathic pain, inclusion criteria were met by 10
helping find relief …. More and larger studies need to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on nabiximols, 3 RCTs
be done on the effects of cannabis on treating PTSD, on nabilone and dronabinol, and only 2 on medical canna-
although recent studies are showing that there is bis.14 A systematic review of 11 high- and moderate-quality
much promise in this form of treatment.4 systematic reviews of RCTs and prospective long-term
observational studies on the effectiveness of cannabinoids
The company bases this conclusion on 2 studies of (both pharmaceutical cannabinoids and cannabis) in pain
uncertain relevance to medical cannabis—one on nabi- management15 found no evidence of benefit for medical
lone5 and the other on pure oral tetrahydrocannabinol cannabis (and limited evidence of benefit for nabiximols in
(THC)6—and on anecdotal evidence from studies that the management of neuropathic pain).

864 Canadian Family Physician | Le Médecin de famille canadien } Vol 65: DECEMBER | DÉCEMBRE 2019
Cannabis industry and medical cannabis clinics need regulation COMMENTARY

Pharmaceutical cannabinoids also have a different cannabis clinics have not published the indications, con-
safety profile than cannabis. Smoking is the most com- traindications, or dosing protocols for the products they
mon route for cannabis ingestion among US adults,16 prescribe. The College of Family Physicians of Canada,
and cannabis smoke contains multiple toxins, some in its 2014 guidance document,25 recommends restrict-
of which are carcinogenic and atherogenic. Smoking ing the prescribing of dried cannabis to patients with
delivers very high concentrations of THC to the brain severe neuropathic pain unresponsive to all first-line
within seconds, which can cause acute cognitive impair- medications. It also recommends a maximum dose of
ment and increase the risk of motor vehicle accidents.17 700 mg of dried cannabis with 9% THC per day. However,
Smoking 2 g of cannabis containing 20% THC, a concen- in 2017, the average daily dose of prescribed medical
tration that is high but available for purchase from pro- cannabis in Canada was 2.3 g,1 well in excess of this
ducers of medical cannabis, will deliver up to 400 mg of recommended maximum. The average concentration
THC to the brain (although some THC will be lost through of THC prescribed has not been reported, but many of
side smoke), whereas 12 sprays of nabiximols, the maxi- the industry’s cannabis products contain concentra-
mum daily dose, only delivers 33 mg of THC. Creating an tions of THC that are far above the 9% recommended
equivalency between these 2 different products is mis- by the guidance document, with some containing con-
leading to consumers and contributes to a lack of public centrations of 20% or more. To discourage inappropri-
knowledge about the effects of medical cannabis. ate prescribing, some US states have imposed medical
requirements on cannabis clinics, including mandatory
Cannabis and opioids training in cannabis prescribing, prescriptions lasting no
Invoking a public health angle, advocates have asserted that more than 30 days, and a requirement to closely follow
cannabis can help prevent or treat opioid use disorder.18 the patient to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the
This claim is based on a study that found that US states that cannabis prescription.26
had legalized cannabis had reductions in opioid overdose The provincial regulatory colleges have put out posi-
rates.19 However, this is an ecologic study that did not ana- tion statements on medical cannabis. For example, the
lyze individual-level data on cannabis use and overdose risk. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario position
Other factors not related to cannabis laws might have con- statement27 advises physicians that they must do a com-
tributed to lower overdose rates, such as prescription moni- prehensive assessment before prescribing cannabis and
toring systems or the crackdown on “pill mills.” A recent identify patients at high risk of cannabis-related harms,
analysis of statewide long-term time trends in overdose such as psychosis or mood disorders. The college also
deaths found that the states that had legalized cannabis had recommends that prescribers use a low dose and monitor
lower rates of prescription opioid overdose before legaliza- for complications such as cannabis use disorder (CUD).
tion, and controlling for this eliminated the association.20 However, evidence from the United States suggests
Contrary to advocates’ claims, observational stud- that physicians frequently prescribe medical cannabis
ies have found a positive association between cannabis to patients who have conditions for which cannabis is
use and opioid use disorder. A review of observational contraindicated, such as CUD. In a US survey study, fam-
studies concluded that opioid misuse is more common ily doctors reported that 31% of their patients who were
among cannabis users than among nonusers,8 and a prescribed medical cannabis by another doctor had a
large American epidemiologic survey found that can- medical condition that could be worsened by cannabis.28
nabis use was associated with nonmedical prescription Another large-scale epidemiologic study found that, out
opioid use (odds ratio of 5.78, 95% CI 4.23 to 7.90) and of a total of 3784 respondents with past-year cannabis
with opioid use disorder (odds ratio of 7.76, 95% CI 4.95 use, 32% of medical cannabis users had past-year CUD,
to 12.16)21; other studies have had similar results.22 compared with 25% of recreational cannabis users.29 A
Medical cannabis users have self-reported that canna- US study of at-risk youth in Denver and San Francisco
bis has helped them reduce their use of prescription opioids found that CUD was significantly (χ2 = 22.8, P < .001) asso-
for pain,23 but there is no objective evidence that cannabis ciated with having a medical cannabis card.30 A review
reduces use of opioid analgesics. In a 4-year Australian of US medical cannabis programs noted that
cohort study of 1500 patients taking opioids for chronic
pain, frequent cannabis users had higher pain scores, higher in many states people receive authorizations for medi-
pain interference scores, and lower pain self-efficacy scores; cal marijuana from physicians whom they have seen for
and they were not using lower opioid doses and did not a single visit …. Initial studies have shown that the typi-
have higher rates of opioid discontinuation.24 cal medical marijuana patient in these states is a young
male with a nonspecific indication of chronic or severe
Regulation and oversight pain and a history of recreational marijuana use.26
of the medical cannabis industry
There is little transparency about the clinical practices of Health Canada is responsible for ensuring that phar-
medical cannabis clinics. To our knowledge, Canadian maceutical products are safe and effective. It approves

Vol 65: DECEMBER | DÉCEMBRE 2019 | Canadian Family Physician | Le Médecin de famille canadien 865
COMMENTARY Cannabis industry and medical cannabis clinics need regulation

products for sale after rigorous review of their safety Health Canada regulatory approval. Nonetheless, it has
and effectiveness, and it requires companies to develop the regulatory authority, and the public health obligation,
a product monograph containing the indications, con- to regulate medical cannabis just as it does with other
traindications, and dosing for the product. Companies pharmaceutical products. Health Canada should require
are not allowed to promote “off-label” uses of their the industry to produce a product monograph, stating
product (ie, for nonindicated conditions). Physicians are the evidence-based indications, precautions, contrain-
expected to be consistent with the product monograph dications, and dosing protocols for medical cannabis.
in their prescribing of the product and in their educa- Health Canada should also prevent the industry from
tional presentations on the product. However, Health making products containing levels of THC higher than
Canada does not require cannabis companies to pro- those used in trials (ie, 9%).
duce and abide by a product monograph, listing the
indications, contraindications, and dosing of their prod- Legalization
ucts. As a result, the educational programs the industry Legalization of recreational cannabis has created uncer-
sponsors have no restrictions on their claims about their tainty about the future of medical cannabis. The Canadian
product. Furthermore, Health Canada has allowed the Medical Association has recommended that the medical
companies to produce cannabis with THC concentra- cannabis program be scrapped.32 However, even if this
tions of 20% or more. Industry involvement in medical happens, the marketing of medical cannabis has enhanced
cannabis marketing and education has a very danger- the public’s perception that cannabis is safe and benefi-
ous precedent: Purdue’s marketing of OxyContin. cial, which in turn will increase the use and the harms of
Health Canada failed in its obligation to protect recreational cannabis. People who have been persuaded
the public in the OxyContin epidemic. Health Canada that cannabis will relieve their pain, anxiety, insomnia, or
approved Purdue’s product monograph even though it PTSD will purchase recreational cannabis if they cannot
contained misleading and inaccurate information. An access medical cannabis. They will also be more resistant
affidavit, submitted to the court as part of the success- to concerns from family and friends about their cannabis
ful national class-action lawsuit against Purdue,31 con- use. There is evidence of an association between positive
cluded that Purdue’s 2009, 2010, and 2011 OxyContin social attitudes about cannabis and population-level use
monographs contained inaccurate statements that of cannabis. Canada has a more positive attitude toward
encouraged physicians to prescribe very high doses of cannabis and a higher per capita use of cannabis than
OxyContin to patients at high risk of addiction, over- Sweden or Finland.33 Exposure to advertising of medi-
dose, and other harms. The monographs suggested that cal cannabis was associated with greater intention to use
OxyContin is indicated for all types of pain; they did cannabis by students in grades 6 through 8 in California.34
not provide a therapeutic range or an upper dose limit; While Canada does not permit direct advertising of can-
they did not warn physicians that high opioid doses nabis, the industry and the clinics are able to market their
are associated with an increased risk of overdose and products through media stories, websites, direct market-
addiction; and they did not warn physicians that cer- ing to physicians, and “agents” who provide advice to con-
tain patient groups were at high risk of these harms. sumers about how to access cannabis.
This allowed Purdue, in its many publications, confer- Whether or not medical cannabis is still available,
ences, and workshops, to tell physicians that OxyContin legalization will likely cause an overall increase in the
could be “dosed to effect,” with no upper limit; that it public health harms of cannabis. In Colorado, where
was effective for all types of pain; and that addiction the legal age for cannabis purchase is 21, emergency
was rare in pain patients. Purdue’s campaign profoundly department visits among adolescents for cannabis-
changed physicians’ prescribing practices and directly or related reasons rose from 1.8 per 1000 visits in 2009 to
indirectly caused the deaths of many thousands of peo- 4.9 per 1000 visits in 2015.35
ple across North America. Health Canada also allowed
Purdue to produce tablets containing up to 80 mg Managing the risks of cannabis use
of oxycodone, 16 times the amount contained in an Family physicians can help protect their patients and the
acetaminophen-oxycodone tablet, with the result that public from the harms of cannabis through the follow-
physicians began prescribing high doses of oxycodone ing steps.
even for benign pain conditions.
While medical cannabis will not lead to overdose Follow the College of Family Physicians of Canada
deaths, it could potentially cause harm and disability guidance document25 when prescribing cannabis. Use
for many. Health Canada has put strict limits on adver- pharmaceutical preparations (nabilone or nabiximols) for
tising, and has set the minimum legal age for canna- patients with neuropathic pain who have not responded
bis purchase at 18, but much more needs to be done. to a trial of adequate dose and duration of first-line
Canadians were given access to medical cannabis medications (serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibi-
because of a Supreme Court decision, not because of tors such as duloxetine, tricyclic antidepressants, and

866 Canadian Family Physician | Le Médecin de famille canadien } Vol 65: DECEMBER | DÉCEMBRE 2019
Cannabis industry and medical cannabis clinics need regulation COMMENTARY

gabapentin or pregabalin), and if an adequate trial of no more than 9%. Family physicians should only pre-
nabilone or nabiximols is ineffective, consider a trial scribe cannabis to patients with neuropathic pain, at a
of vaporized dried cannabis slowly titrated to a maxi- maximum dose of 400 mg per day with 9% THC and an
mum dose of 400 mg containing no more than 9% THC equal amount of cannabidiol. Patients who use cannabis
and at least 9% cannabidiol.25 regularly should be assessed for CUD and given advice
on avoiding cannabis-related harms. It is not too late to
For patients who request a cannabis prescription for a impose evidence-based practice standards and guidelines
nonindicated or contraindicated condition, emphasize that can help prevent the overprescribing of cannabis.
that cannabis lacks evidence of benefit for these condi- Dr Kahan is Associate Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine
tions and has considerable evidence of harm, includ- at the University of Toronto and Medical Director of the Substance Use Service at
Women’s College Hospital in Toronto, Ont. Dr Srivastava is Associate Professor in the
ing motor vehicle accidents,36,37 psychosis,38,39 wor­sening Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto and a
anxiety, 40 long-term cognitive impairment, 41 and family and addictions physician at St Joseph’s Health Centre in Toronto. Dr Clarke is
a knowledge broker for the Mentoring, Education, and Clinical Tools for Addictions:
CUD. Explain that the risk of these harms is increased in Primary Care—Hospital Integration project at Women’s College Hospital.
young patients42-44 and with high THC doses.45 Competing interests
None declared
When patients are already using cannabis for symptom Correspondence
Dr Sarah Clarke; e-mail sarah.clarke@wchospital.ca
control, assess them for CUD. Cannabis use disorder is
characterized by frequent or daily use, spending a lot of The opinions expressed in commentaries are those of the authors. Publication does
not imply endorsement by the College of Family Physicians of Canada.
time using, poor performance at work or school, dete-
References
riorating social relationships, anxiety, depression and 1. Government of Canada [website]. Market data under the Access to Cannabis for Medi-
fatigue, and inability to reduce or stop cannabis.46 Inform cal Purposes Regulations. Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada; 2018. Available from:
https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-medication/cannabis/
patients with CUD that their mood and daily function licensed-producers/market-data.html. Accessed 2019 Oct 16.
will markedly improve with treatment and reduction or 2. Allan GM, Ramji J, Perry D, Ton J, Beahm NP, Crisp N, et al. Simplified guideline for
prescribing medical cannabinoids in primary care. Can Fam Physician 2018;64:111-20
cessation of cannabis use. As with other substance use (Eng), e64-75 (Fr).
disorders, CUD is often precipitated by a mental dis- 3. Apollo Cannabis Clinics [website]. Apollo’s medical cannabis guide. Toronto, ON: Apollo
Cannabis Clinics. Available from: https://d2s2p4r6.stackpathcdn.com/wp-content/
order, particularly PTSD and anxiety and mood disor-
uploads/2019/07/medical_cannabis_guide_onepager2.pdf. Accessed 2019 Oct 16.
ders. Family physicians should identify these conditions 4. How cannabis can help PTSD [blog]. CanniMed.ca 2016 Jul 18. Available from: www.
cannimed.ca/blogs/blog/cannabis-and-ptsd. Accessed 2019 Oct 16.
in patients with suspected CUD, and make appropriate
5. Jetly R, Heber A, Fraser G, Boisvert D. The efficacy of nabilone, a synthetic cannabi-
interventions and referrals. noid, in the treatment of PTSD-associated nightmares: a preliminary randomized,
double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over design study. Psychoneuroendocrinol-
ogy 2015;51:585-8. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
Use a harm-reduction approach with cannabis users 6. Roitman P, Mechoulam R, Cooper-Kazaz R, Shalev A. Preliminary, open-label, pilot
who do not have CUD. Counsel them on the following study of add-on oral ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol in chronic post-traumatic stress
disorder. Clin Drug Investig 2014;34(8):587-91.
safety measures outlined in the lower-risk cannabis use 7. O’Neil ME, Nugent SM, Morasco BJ, Freeman M, Low A, Kondo K, et al. Benefits and
guidelines,47 which include the following: harms of plant-based cannabis for posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic
review. Ann Intern Med 2017;167(5):332-40. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
• Do not drive for at least 6 to 8 hours after using. 8. Wilkinson ST, Radhakrishnan R, D’Souza DC. A systematic review of the evidence for
• Use a vaporizer rather than smoking. medical marijuana in psychiatric indications. J Clin Psychiatry 2016;77(8):1050-64.
9. Walsh Z, Gonzalez R, Crosby K, Thiessen MS, Carroll C, Bonn-Miller MO. Medical can-
• Do not mix with alcohol, opioids, or other sedating
nabis and mental health: a guided systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev 2017;51:15-29.
drugs. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
• Avoid high doses of potent THC, especially if you are 10. Wilkinson ST, Stefanovics E, Rosenheck RA. Marijuana use is associated with worse
outcomes in symptom severity and violent behavior in patients with posttraumatic
younger than age 25, pregnant, or have an active psy- stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2015;76(9):1174-80.
chiatric disorder. 11. Johnson MJ, Pierce JD, Mavandadi S, Klaus J, Defelice D, Ingram E, et al. Mental
health symptom severity in cannabis using and non-using veterans with probable
PTSD. J Affect Disord 2016;190:439-42. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
Only refer patients to a cannabis clinic that adheres 12. Ruglass LM, Shevorykin A, Radoncic V, Smith KM, Smith PH, Galatzer-Levy IR, et al.
Impact of cannabis use on treatment outcomes among adults receiving cognitive-
to a published, evidence-based prescribing guideline behavioral treatment for PTSD and substance use disorders. J Clin Med 2017;6(2):E14.
that has been endorsed by at least 1 unbiased medical 13. Steenkamp MM, Blessing EM, Galatzer-Levy IR, Hollahan LC, Anderson WT. Marijuana
and other cannabinoids as a treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder: a litera-
organization. The guideline should specify the indica- ture review. Depress Anxiety 2017;34(3):207-16. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
tions, precautions, and contraindications for medical 14. Petzke F, Enax-Krumova EK, Häuser W. Efficacy, tolerability and safety of cannabinoids
for chronic neuropathic pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled studies
cannabis, as well as a dosing protocol.2,25
[article in German]. Schmerz 2016;30(1):62-88. Erratum in: Schmerz 2017;31(6):619.
15. Häuser W, Fitzcharles MA, Radbruch L, Petzke F. Cannabinoids in pain management
Conclusion and palliative medicine. An overview of systematic reviews and prospective obser-
vational studies. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2017;114(38):627-34.
The evidence for medical cannabis is very limited, and its 16. Steigerwald S, Wong PO, Cohen BE, Ishida JH, Vali M, Madden E, et al. Smoking, vap-
harms are substantial. Health Canada should require the ing, and use of edibles and other forms of marijuana among U.S. adults. Ann Intern
Med 2018;169(12):890-2. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
industry to produce an evidence-based product mono- 17. Asbridge M, Hayden JA, Cartwright JL. Acute cannabis consumption and motor
graph listing the indications, contraindications, and dos- vehicle collision risk: systematic review of observational studies and meta-analysis.
BMJ 2012;344:e536.
ing of cannabis. Health Canada should also impose a 18. Lucas P. Rationale for cannabis-based interventions in the opioid overdose crisis.
limit on the THC concentration of cannabis products of Harm Reduct J 2017;14(1):58.

Vol 65: DECEMBER | DÉCEMBRE 2019 | Canadian Family Physician | Le Médecin de famille canadien 867
COMMENTARY Cannabis industry and medical cannabis clinics need regulation

19. Bachhuber MA, Saloner B, Cunningham CO, Barry CL. Medical cannabis laws and 34. D’Amico EJ, Miles JN, Tucker JS. Gateway to curiosity: medical marijuana ads and intention
opioid analgesic overdose mortality in the United States, 1999-2010. JAMA Intern and use during middle school. Psychol Addict Behav 2015;29(3):613-9. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
Med 2014;174(10):1668-73. 35. Wang GS, Davies SD, Halmo LS, Sass A, Mistry RD. Impact of marijuana legaliza-
20. Pohl RV. Time trends matter: the case of medical cannabis laws and opioid overdose tion in Colorado on adolescent emergency and urgent care visits. J Adolesc Health
mortality. SSRN 2018 June 22. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3192703. 2018;63(2):239-41.
Accessed 2019 Oct 16. 36. Hartman RL, Huestis MA. Cannabis effects on driving skills. Clin Chem 2013;59(3):478-92.
21. Olfson M, Wall MM, Liu SM, Blanco C. Cannabis use and risk of prescription opioid use Epub 2012 Dec 7.
disorder in the United States. Am J Psychiatry 2018;175(1):47-53. Epub 2017 Sep 26. 37. Ramaekers JG, Berghaus G, van Laar M, Drummer OH. Dose related risk of motor
22. DiBenedetto DJ, Weed VF, Wawrzyniak KM, Finkelman M, Paolini J, Schatman ME, et vehicle crashes after cannabis use. Drug Alcohol Depend 2004;73(2):109-19.
al. The association between cannabis use and aberrant behaviors during chronic 38. Davis GP, Compton MT, Wang S, Levin FR, Blanco C. Association between cannabis use,
opioid therapy for chronic pain. Pain Med 2018;19(10):1997-2008. psychosis, and schizotypal personality disorder: findings from the National Epidemio-
23. Boehnke KF, Litinas E, Clauw DJ. Medical cannabis use is associated with decreased logic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Schizophr Res 2013;151(1-3):197-202.
opiate medication use in a retrospective cross-sectional survey of patients with Epub 2013 Nov 5.
chronic pain. J Pain 2016;17(6):739-44. Epub 2016 Mar 19. 39. Di Forti M, Morgan C, Dazzan P, Pariante C, Mondelli V, Marques TR, et al. High-potency
24. Campbell G, Hall WD, Peacock A, Lintzeris N, Bruno R, Larance B, et al. Effect of can- cannabis and the risk of psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 2009;195(6):488-91.
nabis use in people with chronic non-cancer pain prescribed opioids: findings from 40. Martin-Santos R, Crippa JA, Batalla A, Bhattacharyya S, Atakan Z, Borgwardt S, et al.
a 4-year prospective cohort study. Lancet Public Health 2018;3(7):e341-50. Acute effects of a single, oral dose of d9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabi-
25. College of Family Physicians of Canada. Authorizing dried cannabis for chronic pain diol (CBD) administration in healthy volunteers. Curr Pharm Des 2012;18(32):4966-79.
or anxiety. Preliminary guidance. Mississauga, ON: College of Family Physicians of 41. Meier MH, Caspi A, Ambler A, Harrington H, Houts R, Keefe RS, et al. Persistent can-
Canada; 2014. nabis users show neuropsychological decline from childhood to midlife. Proc Natl
26. Williams AR, Olfson M, Kim JH, Martins SS, Kleber HD. Older, less regulated medical Acad Sci U S A 2012;109(40):E2657-64. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
marijuana programs have much greater enrollment rates than newer ‘medicalized’ 42. Dragt S, Nieman DH, Becker HE, van de Fliert R, Dingemans PM, de Haan L, et al. Age
programs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2016;35(3):480-8. of onset of cannabis use is associated with age of onset of high-risk symptoms for
27. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. Marijuana for medical purposes. Position psychosis. Can J Psychiatry 2010;55(3):165-71.
statement no. 8-16. Toronto, ON: College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario; 2016. 43. Crean RD, Crane NA, Mason BJ. An evidence based review of acute and long-term
28. Kondrad EC, Reed AJ, Simpson MJ, Nease DE. Lack of communication about effects of cannabis use on executive cognitive functions. J Addict Med 2011;5(1):1-8.
medical marijuana use between doctors and their patients. J Am Board Fam Med 44. Brook JS, Lee JY, Brown EN, Finch SJ, Brook DW. Developmental trajectories of mari-
2018;31(5):805-8. juana use from adolescence to adulthood: personality and social role outcomes.
29. Choi NG, DiNitto DM, Marti CN. Nonmedical versus medical marijuana use among Psychol Rep 2011;108(2):339-57.
three age groups of adults: associations with mental and physical health status. Am 45. Hall W, Degenhardt L. Adverse health effects of non-medical cannabis use. Lancet
J Addict 2017;26(7):697-706. Epub 2017 Aug 18. 2009;374(9698):1383-91.
30. Kim J, Coors ME, Young SE, Raymond KM, Hopfer CJ, Wall TL, et al. Cannabis use 46. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disor-
disorder and male sex predict medical cannabis card status in a sample of high risk ders. 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.
adolescents. Drug Alcohol Depend 2018;183:25-33. Epub 2017 Dec 2. 47. Fischer B, Russell C, Sabioni P, van den Brink W, Le Foll B, Hall W, et al. Lower-risk
31. Mackay v Purdue Pharma Inc. 2017. ONSC No. 07-CV-343201CP. cannabis use guidelines: a comprehensive update of evidence and recommenda-
32. Doctors’ group wants to scrap Canada’s medical cannabis program. CBC Radio 2018 tions. Am J Public Health 2017;107(8):e1-12.
Apr 27. Available from: www.cbc.ca/radio/quirks/scrap-medical-weed-women-
in-space-and-more-1.4636793/doctors-group-wants-to-scrap-canada-s-medical-
cannabis-program-1.4636810. Accessed 2019 Oct 23. This article has been peer reviewed. Can Fam Physician 2019;65:864-8
33. Cunningham JA, Blomqvist J, Koski-Jannes A, Raitasalo K. Societal images of can-
nabis use: comparing three countries. Harm Reduc J 2012;9(1):21. Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 873.

868 Canadian Family Physician | Le Médecin de famille canadien } Vol 65: DECEMBER | DÉCEMBRE 2019

You might also like