CHAPTER-VII

A STUDY ON GRANTING OF BAIL BY SESSIONS

COURT AND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURTS IN
GUNTUR, A.P, INDIA

This chapter deals with study on granting bails by Sessions Court,

i.e., Principal District Court in Guntur and Additional District, i.e.,

Additional District Court in Guntur for three successive years from 2007

to 2009. This study is tabulated in 13 columns with each and every

information of the accused who applied for bail in those study period.

Six tables of both the above Courts for three years are drawn with

collected information of granting of bails to each individual accused.

Statistical Methods are applied to these six tables, to draw a final

conclusion that, generally on what factors the Courts in Guntur will grant

bail to the accused. Here, factor means whether actually economical

status influences (or) Caste of the accused influences (or) Residence of

the accused if he belongs to town (or) village (or) city influences (or) any

other factor influences in granting bails to the accused.

287
BAIL APPLICATIONS FILED BEFORE THE PRINCIPAL DISTRIC JUDGE, GUNTUR IN THE YEAR 2007

«5
n
1
0>
S3A
»
in
Crimi- Name of Nature Occu- If bail is not Gen- Town Caste Bail Sec.

5
4>
o
nal pation or Non- sane-

3
1?
sanctioned, der appli- under

S5 o
o
Misce- Accused Offence Bailable tioned reasons, if any discri Village cation which

o
JUi
llaneous

w
•mt

Accu- Offence (or) Not mina- or city bail

Petition Offence sed uop
!
of the Dispo- appli-
Number charged Accu- sed (or) cation
sed Not filed

po
O
ts.
Cl C2 C4 CS C6 C8 C9 CIO C ll C13 C14

i—i
l

o
o
CO
o
cl
t"
I

Shaik
I
CO

Sec. 366 Battery Non- {Bail Male Manga Dispo- 437 &
Allabaksh
a
»f-<

ofIPC Mech. bailable applica- -lagiri sed 439

* *—<
o
a
allowed

l
l
1

002 48/07
PU

D. Babu
•^
0
»y—<
on
6

Sec. 302 Cooly Non- Sane-

o.

Male Hindu 437 &

Rao & 201 of
m
OS

l
bailable tioned rangipu sed
IPC ram
003 55/07 C. Sec. 302, Non- Not By a perusal of Male Narasa Dispo­ 437 &
Veeraiah 120b, bailable sanc­ the previous -raopet sed 439
193 r/w tioned bail Rural
34 of applications by
IPC the Hon ’ble
Judge, the case
could not be
committed so
far because of
the absence of
the accused.
288
i _____
There are no
changed
circumstances
to the previous
bail
application.
004 90/07 Katragadd Sec. 403, Emplo­ Non- Not While granting Male Tadepa Dispos 438
a Lakshmi 420, yee bailable Sanc­ anticipatory Hi PS ed
Rao 467,468 having tioned bail, this court filed
ofIPC 25 directed the case
years petitioner to and
of surrender accuse
service before the d is
Judicial residen
Magistrate of I to f
class, within Vijaya
one week and wda
to furnish bond
for Rs.l 0,000/-
with two
sureties the
take the sum
and the
accused did not
take any steps
for five
months. Hence,
the Hon’ble
289
 Judge taking
into all the

A
circumstances
of the case
which the
accused did not
comply not
sanctioned the
bail.

1l
005 99/07 Raidu Sec. 147, Cultiva Non- Sanc­ Male Thonda Hind Dispo­ 437 &
Srinivasa 148, -tion bailable tioned pi u sed 439
Rao 324, (Villag
307,427 e)
r/w 149 Rural
ofIPC
and Sec.
35 of
900 E.S. Act
1
243/07 Kuchipudi 302 R/W Non- Not As a perusal of Male Ponnur Dispos 437 &
Raja 34 of bailable Sanc­ record the Rural ed 439.
!
Kumar IPC tioned Hon ’ble Judge
came to
conclusion
that,
investigation is
in progress and
the accused
1+4 inflicted
290
 injuries on the
deceased as per
fact it is clearly
seen and at this
stage if bail is
grant the will
tamper the
prosecution
witness and the
bail is not
sanctioned.
007 244/07 T. Sunil 302 RAV Non- Not The accused Male Munip Dispo­ 437 &
@ 34 of bailable sanc­ may tamper alii sed 439
Tamatalod IPC tioned prosecution (village
u witness as the )>
investigation is Ponnur
in progress. Rural

1l

o
o
oo
393/1/07 C. Veera 302, 324 Non- Sanc­ Male Pedako Dispo­ 437 &
Raghavaia RAV 34 bailable tioned ru sed 439
h of IPC J
(Villag
e),
Tenali
600 Rural
1
l

486/07 Kancherla Sanc­ Male Arunde Dispo­ 437 &

Das tioned Ipet, sed 439
Guntur
Urban

291
010 505/07 T. 302 R/W Busine Non- Not Because, Male A.T. Vadd Dispo­ 437 &
Srinivasa 34 of ss bailable sanc­ accused will Agraha era sed 439 of
Rao IPC tioned tamper the ram, Cr.P.C.
prosecution Guntur
witnesses. Urban

-<

o
1
1
1
530/07 ‘ G. Joji 323, Non- Sanction Male Nakari Dispos 437 &
324, 302 bailable ed kal, ed 439
R/W 34 Macher
or IPC la
Rural !
----------------
12 531/07 J. 147, Non- No Because, Male Vattich Dispos 437 &
.

Sambaiah 148, 302 bailable Sanction accused will erukur ed 439

R/W 149 ed tamper the u,
of IPC prosecution Guntur
witnesses Dt.

m
557/07 Pandthirid 302 & Cultiva Non- Not Because, Male Pathur Redd Dispos 437 &
u 201 of tion bailable Sanction accused will u y ed 439
Srinivasa IPC ed tamper the (Villag
Reddy !
prosecution e),
witnesses Tadepa
Hi
!

1
(Md),
i

Guntur
Dt.

292
 567/07 D. 302,201 Non- Not Because, Male Guntur Naid Dispos 437 &
Varahala &120B bailable Sanction accused will town u ed 439
Naidu ofIPC ed tamper the
prosecution
witnesses

in
567/07 D. 302, 201 Non- Sanction This bail Male Guntur Naid Dispos 437 &
Varahala & 120B bailable ed application is town u ed 439
Naidu & ofIPC the second one
Another as the 567/07
of accused No.
1 previous bail
application is
rejected

r—H
lO
572/07 P. China 302 read Non- Not This bail Male Nagaij Hind Dispos 437 &
Brahmam with 34 bailable Sanction application is una u ed 439
ofIPC ed dismissed as Sagar,
i

the accused Guntur

No.3 who Dt.
applied for bail
may tamper the
prosecution
witnesses

r***H
r-
572/1/07 P. 302 read Non- Sanction This bail Male Nagaij Dispos 437 &
Brahmam with 34 bailable ed application is una ed 439
ofIPC the second one Sagar,
as the previous Guntur
bail application Dt.
293
 is rejected No.
Cr.L.M.P.
527/07 on a
condition to
execute a self
bond of
Rs. 10,000/-
each with two
sureties.

i-H
OO
611/07 Badduri 302, 307 Cultiva Non- Not This, bail Male Macher Redd Dispos 437 &
Seshi of IPC tion bailable sanction application is la y ed 439
Reddy ed dismissed as Rural
i

the accused can area

tamper the
prosecution
witnesses.

1
a\
611/1/07 Badduri 302, 307 Cultiva Non- Sanction This is the Male Macher Redd Dispos 437 &
Seshi of IPC tion bailable ed second bail la y ed 439
Reddy application as Rural
the first in area
Crl.MP 611/07
was dismissed
and this time it
was allowed on
a reason that
the prosecution
has no case

j
that accused
294
 has any overt
acts as per the
tampering of
witnesses of
oz prosecution.
625/07 Kantheti 147,148, Non- Sanction As it is a fit All Nakari Hind Dispos 437 &
Venkata 302,307, bailable ed to all case and the are kallu, u ed 439
Rao and 427 R/W accept investigation is Male Macher
19 others. 149 of accused in progress. la area
(Bail IPC 1,2,3 Accused No.2,
applicatio and 7. 3 and 7 are
n of A1 to seemed with
A18, 20, overt Acts,
21) hence, bail is
dismissed i

! ------ against them.

cs
i f
625/1/07 K. 147,148, Non- Sanction Accused No.3 Male Nakari Hind Dispos 437 &
Venkata 302,307, bailable edto and 7 granted kallu, u ed 439
Rao & 19 427 R/W accused bail as their Macher
others 149 of No.3 and bail is rejected la area
IPC 7. under Crl.MP
625/07.
22 625/2/07 K. Rama 147,148,
xi-

Non- Sanction Accused No.2 Male Nakari Hind Dispos

Koteswara 302,307, bailable
co co
f" C\

edto granted bail as kallu, u ed

Rao 427 R/W accused his bail is Macher
149 of No.2. rejected la area
IPC previously
under Crl.M.P.
295
 625/1/07 by
executing a
bond of
Rs. 10,000/-
each with two
sureties.
23 646/07 Shaik 365,302, Non- Dismisse As the accused Male Mangal Musli Dispos 437 &
Vasuddin 201 R/W bailable d can tamper the agiri m ed 439 of
34 of prosecution Rural Cr.P.C.
IPC witnesses
24 646/1/07 Shaik 365,302, Busine Non- Dismisse This the second Male Mangal Musli Dispos 437 &
Vasuddin 201 R/W ss bailable d bail application agiri m ed 439 of
34 of to previous one Rural Cr.P.C.
IPC Crl.M.P.
646/07 and
previous one
and second one
both dismissed
on the even
grounds

VO
vB
CJ
25 Shaik 365,302, Busine Non- Sanction On a condition Male Mangal Musli Dispos 437 &
Vasuddin 201 R/W ss bailable ed that accused agiri m ed 439 of
34 of should not Rural Cr.P.C.
IPC leave
Mangalagiri
and this is the
third time the
accused
296
 applied for
bail. First one
is 646/1, and
second one is
646/2/07.
26 647/1/07 Koratla 302,201 Non- Sanction No reasons Male Ponnur Dispos 437 &
Dharma R/W34 bailable ed to A1 mentioned for Rural ed 439 of
Teja ofIPC and rejection of Cr.P.C.
rejected bail to A2 i

i
to A2. specifically

Cd

"'t
o
c—
27 Koratla 302,201 Non- Sanction Bail Male Ponnur Dispos 437 &
Dharma R/W34 bailable ed application of Rural ed 439 of
Teja ofIPC A2 is rejected Cr.P.C.
1 for the 3rd time
as previously
in Crl.M.P.
647/2007,
647/1/2007
28 647/3/07 Koratla 302,201 Non- No Bail application Male Ponnur Dispos 437 &
Dharma R/W34 bailable Sanction of A2 rejected for Rural ed 439 of
Teja ofIPC the fourth time, as
ed Cr.P.C.
the investigation
is in progress and
the reading of the
record does not
renewal the need
i to grant bail
29 661/07 Suttayar 302 IPC Non- Not As the victim Male R. Dispos 437 &
Raja bailable sanction died under Agraha ed 439 of
ed going ram, Cr.P.C.
treatment in Guntur
hospital, the urban
accused can
tamper the
witnesses of
prosecution.
Hence, bail is
j

dismissed
30 661/1/07 Suttayar 302 IPC Non- Not This the second Male R. Dispos 437 &
Raja bailable sanction bail application Agraha ed 439 of
ed previous to ram, Cr.P.C.
661/07 which Guntur
i !

i
was also urban
rejected

m
661/2/07 Suttayar 302 IPC Non- Sanction At this stage Male R. Dispos
Raja bailable ed the Hon’ble Agraha ed
i

i
^1-^0
mm,*-;
O 0\ ^

1
Court find that ram,
the accused if Guntur
released on bail urban
cannot tamper
the prosecution
witness and
hence, bail is
allowed
 32 700/07 R. 302 R/W Non- Not Because he can Male Guntur Dispos 437 &
Yesaiah & 34 bailable sanction tamper Rural ed 439 of
Another ed prosecution PS Cr.P.C.
(A1& witness
1
_______________
A2)
33 700/1/07 K. Samuel 302 R/W Non- Not Because the Male Guntur Dispos 437 &
i

& Others 34 bailable sanction investigation is Rural ed 439 of

(A5 to ed in progresss PS Cr.P.C.
A7)
34 700/2/07 K. Samuel 302 R/W Non- Sanction Bail is granted Male Guntur Dispos 437 &
& Others 34 bailable ed to A5 to A7 Rural ed 439 of
(A5 to PS Cr.P.C.
A7)______

cn
<n
711/07 Muvva 302 IPC Non- Sanction Male Tenali Dispos 437 &
Ramana bailable ed urban ed 439 of
@ Cr.P.C.
Venkata
Ramana
36 713/07 Bommana 302 R/W Non- Not That, the Male Macher Dispos 437 &
boina 34 of bailable Sanction accused may la ed 439 of
Itham IPC ed tamper the Cr.P.C.
Raju (A2) prosecution
witness
ii

37 713/1/07 Bommana 302 R/W Non- Sanction Male Macher Dispos 437 &
boina 34 of bailable ed la ed 439 of
Itham IPC Cr.P.C.
Raju (A2)

299
 CO
746/07 Davula 302,307, Non- Not No grounds Male Chilak Dispos 437 &
Koteswara 324 of bailable Sanction mentioned for aluripet ed 439 of
Rao IPC ed dismissal of Cr.P.C.
bail application
39 746/1/07 Davula 302,307, Non- Sanction No grounds Male Chilak Dispos 437 &
Koteswara 324 of bailable ed mentioned for aluripet ed 439 of
Rao IPC granting bail Cr.P.C.

t-"
©
40 T.
^

302 IPC Non- Sanction A l, A2, A3 Male Narasa Dispos

Lakshmi
m m
o
C-~ 0\

bailable ed only and A5 are not raopet ed

Narayana
y

to A5 granted bail as
& Others they can
tamper the
I
--- witnesses

<
761/07 I. 302 IPC Non- Not No grounds ■Male Pattabh Dispos 437 &
Thirupathi bailable Sanction mentioned ipuram, ed 439 of
Reddy ed Guntur Cr.P.C.
42 761/1/07 I. 302 IPC Non- Not No grounds Male Pattabh Dispos 437 &
Thirupathi bailable Sanction mentioned ipuram, ed 439 of
Reddy ed Guntur Cr.P.C.
43 761/2/07 I. 302 IPC Non- Sanction No grounds Male Pattabh Dispos 437 &
Thirupathi bailable ed mentioned ipuram, ed 439 of
Reddy Guntur Cr.P.C.

cs
o
VO
r-
t-
44 B. 147,148, Non- Sanction Bail Male Guraza Dispos 437 &
Narayana 302,307 bailable ed for application is la ed 439 of
Reddy R/W 149 the rejected in Cr.P.C.
IPC fourth 762/2007,
time 762/1/2007,
300
 762/2/2007,
762/3/2007 of
the same
accused and
granted bail in
762/4/2007
45 769/07 Pulagam 302 Non- Sanction Bail Male Guntur Dispos 437 &
and Srinivas bailable ed for application ed 439 of
769/1/07 Reddy 2nd time filed second Cr.P.C.
time granted as
I

there is no
chance to
tamper the
witness

l
l
l

©
©
r->
46 Yarlagadd 302 R/W Non- Sanction Male Nagara Gow Dispos 437 &
a 34 of bailable ed m da ed 439 of
Srinivasa IPC Cr.P.C.
Rao (A2)

I
l
l
47 771/07 Pogadada 302 R/W Non- Sanction Male Peda Telag Dispos
nda 34 of
to m
t" on

bailable ed Kakani a ed
Nageswar IPC
Tt ^ U

a Rao

oo
©
©
C"
148 Shaik 302 R/W Non- No A1 andA2’s Male '
Peda Musli Dispos 437 &
Akbar Ali 34 of bailable Sanction application was Kakani m ed 439 of
and IPC dismissed on the
ed Cr.P.C.
ground that they
Another can tamper the
prosecution
witnesses
301
49 780/1/07 Shaik 302 R/W Non- Sanction A1 and A2 Male Peda Musli Dispos 437 &
Akbar Ali 34 of bailable ed application Kakani m ed 439 of
and IPC which was Cr.P.C.
Another rejected in
Crl.M.P.
780/07 was
allowed
50 781/07 Tanapati 302 R/W Auto Non- Not Special reasons Male Peda Hind Dispos 437 &
China 34 of Driver bailable Sanction are not Kakani u ed 439 of
Mallaiah IPC ed mentioned Cr.P.C.

li
i

in
781/1/07 Tanapati 302 R/W Auto Non- Sanction Male Peda Hind Dispos 437 &
China 34 of Driver bailable ed Kakani u ed 439 of
Mallaiah IPC Cr.P.C.

ll
52 791/07 R. ' 498A, Non- Sanction Male Nagara Dispos 437 &
Sreedhar 506 R/W bailable ed mpale ed 439 of
(Al) 34 of m, Cr.P.C.
IPC Guntur
53 800/07 Latchi 302 R/W Non- Not No grounds are Male Nagara Dispos 437 &
Ravindra 34 of bailable Sanction mentioned mPS, ed 439 of
(Al) IPC ed Repalle Cr.P.C.
54 800/3/07 Latchi 302 R/W Non- Sanction Crl.M.P. Male Nagara Dispos 437 &
Ravindra 34 of bailable ed 800/1/07, mPS, ed 439 of
(Al) IPC 800/2/07 and Repalle Cr.P.C.
800/07 all the
three bail
application of
this accused
------------------------- 1
were dismissed.
302
 This is the 4th
application
which was
allowed taking
into
consideration
that all the
material
witnesses were
examined and
there is danger
to grant bail to
this accused.
55 806/1/07 Gogula 302, 201 Non- Sanction In Crl.M.P. Male Guraza Dispos 437 &
Sivannara ofIPC bailable ed 806/07, the bail la ed 439 of
yana& application Cr.P.C.
Another rejected and
this the 2nd one.
i

But, no special
reasons

.
mentioned.
j
i
’
................ .
56 828/07 Akula 452,326, Non- Sanction Male Narasa Dispos 437 &
Anji 324,307 bailable ed raopet ed 439 of
Reddy ofIPC Cr.P.C.
1
ll

57 829/07 Challa 302 R/W Non- Sanction Male Macher Dispos 437 &
Kotaiah & 34 of bailable ed la ed 439 of
Others IPC Cr.P.C.
(A24)
58 830/07 Challa 302 R/W Non- Sanction Accused No.49 Male Durgi Dispos 437 &
Kotaiah & 34 of bailable ed is granted bail PS, ed 439 of
Others IPC but no reasons Macher Cr.P.C.
(A49) mentioned la
59 835/07 G. Papi
^

147,148, Non- Sanction In 835/07 bail All Rentac Dispos

Reddy &
m m
on

302,307 bailable ed in application are hintala ed

18 Others
U
^

R/W 149 part first dismissed. In Male

&A20 of IPC and then 835/1/07 only
to all A20 granted
i

accused bail and in

835/2/07 bail
of all other
accused
i
rejected. In
i

835/3/07 bail
of all accused
i.e. 18 accused
granted and
09 allowed
1
l
842/07 Kadiyam 147,148, Non- Sanction Male Guraza Dispos
Muthaiah 307 R/W
O ON

bailable ed la ed
^ U
m m rH<
*o cj

149 of
IPC

NO
854/1/07 Posani 302 Non- Sanction Bail in Male Guraza Dispos 437 &
Venkata bailable ed Crl.M.P. la ed 439 of
Narayana 854/07 was Cr.P.C.
rejected and
304
 this is the
second bail
application
which was
allowed on the
grounds that
accused cannot
tamper the
witnesses
62 855/07 P. 302,307 Non- Not ! :
The accused is Male Tenali Dispos 437 &
Narendra R/W34 bailable Sanction Rowdy sheeter ed 439 of
ofIPC ed in Jaggaiahpet Cr.P.C.
and and involved in
120B number of
other cases.
Hence, petition
is dismissed
63 865/1/07 Sangam 302 R/W Non- Sanction In Crl.M.P. Male Guntur Dispos 437 &
Lakshmi 34 of bailable ed 865/07 the bail ed 439 of
|

t
IPC is rejected and Cr.P.C.
this time it was
granted
because the
examination of
witness already
completed i
64 866/1/07 P. Pavan 302 IPC Non- Sanction In Crl.M.P. Male Guntur Dispos 437 &
Kumar bailable ed 866/07 bail is ed 439 of
not granted but Cr.P.C.
at this stage it
was granted
because
examination of
witnesses is
completed
65 873/07 Alapati 3 0 2 IPC Non- Sanction Only R.F.S.L. Male Dispos 437 &
Ananda bailable ed report has to be ed 439 of
Rao record as a part Cr.P.C.
@Mani of investigation
even though
there seems to
be no chance to
tamper
witnesses and
hence he was
99 released
890/1/07 G. 302 R/W Non- No In Crl.M.P. All Chilak Dispos 437 &
Yesuratna 34 bailable sanction 890/7 A1 to A6 are aluripet ed 439 of
m edon applied and only Male Cr.P.C.
previous A5 granted bail
occasion in Crl.M.P.
but this 890/1/07 and all
others in
time it is
890/2/07
granted
306
 1
I
l
67 891/07 Bommidi 302 of Non- Sanction Male Rompi Dispos 437 &
Anuradha IPC bailable ed cherla, ed 439 of
Narasa Cf.P.C.
89 raopet
949/07 Mareboina 324,302 Non- No In Crl.M.P. Male Guntur Dispos 437 &
Srinivasa of IPC bailable Sanction 949/07 bail is ed 439 of
Rao ed rejected after Cr.P.C.
that, this
accused
applied two
times for bail
in Crl.M.P.
949/1/07 and
949/2/07 and in
all these three
occasions bails
i
are dismissed
and he can
tamper the
prosecution
witnesses and
again the
accused did not
applied for any
bail in this
court

307
 l
j

r-*
69 954/07 302 IPC Non- Sanction Fama Guraza Dispos 437 &

p4 %
S' a
a js
XA
la
bailable ed le la ed 439 of
Cr.P.C.
70 962/1/07 Vasireddy 302,307 Non- No In Crl.MJP. All Tenali Dispos 437 &
Siva Linga R/W34 bailable Sanction 962/07 A l, A2, are ed 439 of
Prasad & of IPC ed A3 applied for Male Cr.P.C.
Anothers and bail it was
(Al, A2 120(b) rejected that
and A3) of IPC they are
threatening the
witnesses even
from jail by
other means
and on this
ground 2nd time
also bail
dismissed
962/2/07 Vasireddy 302,307 Non- Sanction In above all Male Tenali Dispos 437 &
Siva Linga R/W34 bailable ed Crl.M.P. 46, ed 439 of
962/3/07 Prasad & of IPC A3 and A2 was Cr.P.C.
Anothers and granted bail
962/4/07 (Al, A2 120(b) respectively
and A3) of IPC
72 981/2/07 Vellanki 302,307 Non- Sanction In CrFM.P. Male Tenali Dispos 437 &
Krishna R/W34 baialble ed 981/07 and ed 439 of
Rao & 120B 981/1/07 on the Cr.P.C.

.
of IPC two previous
 occasions the
bail was
dismissed and
for the third
time bail was
granted but no
specific
reasons were
mentioned

m
1023/2/0 Krovi 120-B, Non- Not This is the Male Guntur Dispos 437 &
7 Subba Rao 302, bailable Sanction third time, ed 439 of
(A7) 341,201 ed accused Cr.P.C.
IPC applying for
bail. In
Crl.M.P.
j
1023/07 and
1023/1/07 the l

1
Hon’ble Court
i

came to view
that this
accused may
tamper the
witnesses

t—
1024/1/0 Kavuri 147,148, Non- Sanction In Crl.M.P. Dispos 437 &
7 Kotaiah 302,307, bailable ed 1024/07, the ed 439 of
324,427 bail was Cr.P.C.
R/W 149 rejected that
IPC the accused
309
 may involve in
unlawful
assembly and
at this stage but
is granted
because, it
seems by
investigation
that the
accused can ’t
tamper the
prosecution
witness
75 1025/07 Lingamgu 302 Non- Sanction No grounds Male Guntur Dispos 437 &
ntla bailable ed mentioned ed 439 of
Ankalu Cr.P.C.
76 1031/1/0 Alavula Non- Sanction In Crl.M.P. Male Karam Dispos 437 &

Sr;
7 Venkata bailable ed 1031/2007 pudi, ed 439 of
i

Reddy which is the Guraza Cr.P.C.

i

first la
application bail
l

is dismissed, i

because
accused is
moroists and
also
blackmailed
some persons
310
 near area and
in this second
application as
the
examination of
witnesses is
completed bail
is granted
77 1032/07 Krovi 120B, Non- No As applied bail Male Guntur Dispos 437 &
Sitaramanj 302,341, bailable Sanction for three time ed 439 of
aneyulu 2 0 IPC ed i.e., in CrLM.P. Cr.P.C.
(A8) 1032/2007,
1032/1/07 &
1032/2/07 all
these were
dismissed
because A6 to
A8 in the case
; murdered the
deceased with
the help of A2 to
A5 if at this
stage A8 is
released, the
Hon’ble Court
came to opinion
1
that he can
tamper the
witnesses
78 1033/07 KOthapall 420, Non- Sanction Male Pattabh Dispos 437 &
i Sarath 120B, bailable ed ipuram, ed 439 of
Babu 406,465 Guntur Cr.P.C.
79 1043/07 Madira 302 Non- Not Bail is Male Tenali Dispos 437 &
Sailesu @ bailable Sanction dismissed ed 439 of
Sailesu ed because, Cr.P.C.
Fox accused is a
Rowdy Sheeter
if released can
tamper the
witnesses at the
stage of trial.
But, bail
application of
this accused in
Crl.MJP.
1043/1/2007 is
granted______
80 1055/07 Vadepalli 302,201 Non- Sanction Male Guntur Dispos 437 &
Srinivasa R/W 34 bailable ed ed 439 of
Rao Cr.P.C.
81 1056/07 Chunduru 302 R/W Non- Sanction Male Mangal Dispos 437 &
Narendra 34 IPC bailable ed agiri ed 439 of
Cr.P.C.
82 1068/07 Kollikond 302 IPC Non- Sanction Male Sattena Dispos 437 &
a bailable d palli ed 439 of
Yedukond Cr.P.C.
alu (A2)
312
83 1072/07 Shaik 302 R/W Non- Not Because, A2 Male Tenali Dispos 437 &
Khasim & 34 bailable Sanction and A3 ed 439 of
Another ed murdered die Cr.P.C.
(A2& deceased in a i

A3) cruel way and

thrown the
deadbody in
bushes and at
this stage as a
manner of their
overt Act bail
cannot be
granted. But, in
Crl.M.P.
1072/1/07 bail
was granted to
i
i

i
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
this accused.
84 1085/07 P. 302 Non- Not Accused killed Male Guraza Dispos 437 &
Venkates bailable Sanction one la ed 439 of
warulu ed Gopannawith Cr.P.C.
whom he is
having illegal
intimacy and
she died under
going
treatment and
case was 1

turned from
313
Sec.307 to 302
ofIPC and the
accused having
every chance to
tamper
evidence the
bail is
dismissed. But
In Crl.M.P.
1085/1/2007 he
is granted with
bail
BAIL APPLICATIONS FILED BEFORE THE PRINCIPAL DISTRIC JUDGE, GUNTUR IN THE YEAR 2008
Crimi­ Name of Nature Occu­ Bailable Bail is If bail is not Gen­ Town Caste Bail Sec.
nal Mis- the of pation or Non- sanc­ sanctioned, der (or) appli­ under

o
llaneous Accused Offence of Bailable tioned reasons, if any discri Village cation which
Petition (or) Accu­ Offence (or) Not urina­ or city is bail
Number Offence sed tion of the Dispo­ appli­
charged Accu­ sed (or) cation
sed Not filed

a
B
2
8
2
TOO C4 C6 CIO C ll C13 C14

o
0-1
ao
oo
Golla Sec. 302
't
l"~
co
=8

Non- Sanction No specific Male Ponnur Hind Dispo­

Sitharamu
m

IPC
G\

bailable ed reasons u sed

lu
'o ^
^U

mentioned for
not sanctioning
bail
1

1
application.
But, the 2nd
bail application
in Crl.M.P.
906/1/08 of
this accused
was allowed
002 910/08 Suragani 302 & Non- Not No specific Male Bapatla Gow Dispo­ 437 &
Chalamaia 304 of bailable Sanction reasons da sed 439 of
h IPC ed mentioned for Cr.P.C.
dismissal even
though it is a
304-B case
315
 were the
accused poured
kerosene on his
wife and burnt
her. But, after
two months the
accused
granted with
bail in Crl.M.P.
£00 910/1/08
911/08 Shaik 302 R/W Non- Not No specific Male Guntur Musli Dispo­ 437 &
Abdul 34 bailable Sanction reasons m sed 439 of
i

1
Azeez ed mentioned Cr.P.C.
i

1 ----------------------- (A5)

i
ii
004 921/08 Chinna 307, Non- Sanction Male Vinuko Dispo­ 437 &
Ramaiah 120-B bailable ed nda sed 439 of
Cr.P.C.
005 948/08 Shaik 302, Non- Not Bail is not All Guntur Musli Dispo­ 437 &
Jameer & R/W 34 bailable Sanction granted as the are m sed 439 of
3 Others ofIPC ed investigation is Male Cr.P.C.
(A1 to in progress.
A4) But, in Crl.M.p.
948/1/08 A1 to
A4 granted bail
i

as there is no
chance to
tamper the
prosecution
witnesses
316
900

l
l
l
995/08 Emmela 307,327 Non- Sanction All Prathip Chris Dispo­
Paradesy R/W34 bailable ed are adu, tian sed
& Others
m m rh<
U
O On ^
^ o ^

Male Guntur
(A1 to Dt.
AT)______
007 996/08 Alla 302 Non- Not No specific Male Amarth Telag Dispo­ 437 &
Koteswara bailable Sanction reasons aluru a sed 439 of
Rao ed mentioned i
Cr.P.C.
other than the
investigation is
in progress and
the accused
granted bail for
2nd time in
Crl.M.P.
996/1/08

o
o
oo
997/08 Shaik 307 R/W Non- Sanction In Crl.M.P. Male Atcha Musli Dispo­ 437 &
abdul 34 of bailable ed 997/1/08 the mpet m sed 439 of
Kareem & IPC accused was Cr.P.C.
Another granted
(A1 & relaxation of
A2) conditions for
i

bail granted
i
under this
600 application
1
!

1004/08 T. 302 R/W Non- Sanction Male Mangal Dispo­ 437 &
Nageswar 34 of bailable ed agiri sed 439 of
a Rao IPC Cr.P.C.
317
010 1005/08 P.S. Giri 302 IPC Non- Sanction Male Kollur Dispo­ 437 &
Vara bailable ed u, sed 439 of
Prasad Guntur Cr.P.C.
t
Dt.

o
1012/08

• ?-■<

cd
Gorigapud 302 IPC Non- Sanction Male Tenali ! Dispo­ 437 &

.
^ cd
i Kondalu bailable ed

GO
sed 439 of
Cr.P.C.

Q
012

a
cd
1026/08 302 IPC House Non- Sanction Pidugu Dispo­ 437 &

& 33
^
’§ |
wife bailable ed ralla sed 439 of

cd
Cr.P.C.
1
013 1031/08 Chinta 302,201 Non- Not As the A1 is Edlapa Dispo­ 437 &
Koteswara IPC bailable Sanction investigation is Fema du, sed 439 of
Rao & 3 ed in progressthe le, all Chilak Cr.P.C.
Others accused 1 2 ,4
, 3 aluripet
(A1,A2, & 5 murdered other i

A4 & A5) deceased in a s are

brutal way if Male
tey release at
this stage they
can tamper the
witnesses. But,
they granted
bail at the stage
of trial in
Crl.M.P.
1031/1/08
014 1045/08 Momdedd 302 IPC Non- Not No specific Male Guntur Redd Dispo­ 437 &
ula bailable Sanction grounds y sed 439 of
Srinivasa ed mentioned but Cr.P.C.
Reddy he is granted
bail in Crl.M.P.
1045/1/08

1
l
l

o
1058/08 c. Suresh 420 R/W Non- Sanction Male Guntur Dispo­ 437 &
Babu 34 IPC bailable ed sed 439 of
Cr.P.C.

i
!
016 1059/08 Kotta 302 Non- Sanction Male Tadepa Dispo­ 437 &
Appaiah@ bailable ed Hi sed 439 of
Appama Cr.P.C.

r
l

o
i
c-
1060/08 Aripati 366-A Student Non- Sanction Male Mangal Hind Dispo­ 437 &
l

Koteswara bailable ed agiri u sed 439 of

Rao Cr.P.C.

l
018 1061/08 Kadiyam 307 R/W Non- Sanction Male Karam Chris Dispo­ 437 &
Abraham 34 bailable ed pudi, 1
tian sed 439 of
Guraza Cr.P.C.
la

O
On
1069/08 Chittipadd 304-B Non- Not Bail is Male Tenali Dispo­ 437 &
i R/W 34 bailable Sanction sanctioned sed 439 of
Koteswara ed against A1 and Cr.P.C.
m m a& 2 A2 and A3 not
Others granted bail. As
(A1 to it is a case of
A3) dowry death A2
and A3 are in
 laws of
deceased. They
granted bail
after completion
of investigation
in Crl.M.P.
1069/1/2008

l
l
l
020 1095/08 Ullangula 420 R/W Non- Sanction Male Guntur Dispo­ 437 &
Kotaiah & 3 4 IPC bailable ed sed 439 of
Another Cr.P.C.
(A1 &
A2)

l
l

O
(N
H
l
1096/08 Rice Sec. 14 Non- Sanction Male Bapatla Chris Dispo­ 437 &
Robert of bailable ed tian sed 439 of
Arthur Foreigne Cr.P.C.
i

rs Act,
1946

j
l
022 1112/08 Yamarthi 302 Cooli Non- Sanction Male Nekari Mala Dispo­ 437 &
i
Babu Rao i
bailable ed kallu sed 439 of
i

Babu i

i
-------------------------------- Cr.P.C.
1
l
023 l
1124/08 Gollamudi 302, 201 Non- Sanction Male Nagara Dispo­ 437 &
1
-

Bhaskara bailable ed m sed 439 of

Rao Cr.P.C.
l
l
l

024 1176/08 Kommu 147, Agricul Non- Sanction Male Karam Hind Dispo­ 437 &
Peraiah & 148, turist bailable ed pudi u sed 439 of
Another 447, 302 Cr.P.C.
(A6 A7) R/W 149
of IPC
320
 j
025 1167/08 Nalam 411, Busine Non- Sanction Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ 437 &
Umamahe 406,420 ss bailable ed u sed 439 of
i

swara Rao R/W34 Cr.P.C.

(A3) ofIPC
026 1189/08 Kolikapud 307 of Non- Sanction Male Tadiko Dispo­
i Sivaiah
t- a\
m m

IPC bailable ed nda sed

(5) Siva
't "t U

r
027 1190/08 Rekhapalli ! 302 IPC Non- Sanction Male Macha Muth Dispo­ 437 &
Srinivasa bailable ed varam arasi sed 439 of
rao @ Cr.P.C.
Jeebula
Srinu
028 1223/08 Dhupati 302 and Washer Non- Sanction Male Agnigu Rajak Dispo­ 437 &
Ankarao 201 of man bailable ed ndala a sed 439 of
IPC (V), Cr.P.C.
Ipur
i- ---------------- (Md)

l
029 1224/08 Motamarri 304-B Non- Dismisse A1 Narasa Dispo­ 437 &
Venkata IPC • bailable d Male, raopet sed 439 of
Veeranjane A2 Cr.P.C.
yulu& 3 Fema 1
Others. M.
Rajyalaksh
le &
mi, M. Sri A3,
j

Rama A4
Murthy, M. are
Basaveswa Male
raRao i

321
 I
i
i
030 1224/08 Motamarri 304-B Non- Sanction A1 Narasa Dispo­
Venkata IPC
o\
m m
^
bailable ed Male, raopet sed
Veeranjane
O
A2
yulu & 3
Fema
Others. M.
Rajyalaksh
le &
mi, M. Sri A3,
Rama A4
Murthy, M. are
Basaveswa Male
raRao
r

o
!

t—H
m
i
i
1256/08 Kolluru 302 IPC Non- Dismisse Male Nizam Dispo­ 437 &
Subrahma bailable d patnam sed 439 of
nyam Cr.P.C.

1
K
032 1256/1/0 Kolluru 302 IPC Non- Sanction Male Nizam Dispo­ 437 &
8 Subrahma bailable ed patnam sed 439 of
i

nyam Cr.P.C.

i
l
l
033 1257/08 Munagala 302,201 Non- Sanction Male Guntur Dispo­ 437 &
Bala of IPC bailable ed sed 439 of
Koteswara Cr.P.C.
Rao 1
l
l

034 1269/08 Syed 302 R/W Non- Sanction A2,A Turaka Musli Dispo­ 437 &
Bijanbi & 34 of bailable ed for 3, A5palem( m sed 439 of
4 Others IPC A2 to A5 Male V), Cr.P.C.
(A2, A3, &A1, Mediko
A4, A5) A4 nduru
are (Md)
Fe­
male
322
 l
ll
035 1269/1/0 Syed 302, Non- Sanction Fema Turaka Musli Dispo­ 437 &
8 Bijanbi R/W34 bailable ed le palem m sed 439 of
ofIPC (V), Cr.P.C.
Medik
onduru
(Md)
036 1269/2/0 Sd. Baji Petition is A2, Turaka Musli Dispo­ 437 &
8 Hussain allowed A3, palem m sed 439 of
(A2), Sd. conditions A5 (V), Cr.P.C,
Ajeemudin imposed on , Male Medik
(A3), Sd.
Crl.M.P. &A4 onduru
Minobi
(A4) Sd. 1269/08, dt. Fema (Md)
Budan 18/08/2008 are le
(A5) eleased
037 1269/3/0 Syed 302 R/W Non- Relaxed Bail condition Fema Turaka Musli Dispo­ 437 &
8 Bijanbi 34 of bailable imposed on le palem m sed 439 of
(Al) IPC 01/9/2008 in (V), Cr.P.C.
Crl.M.P. Medik
1269/1/08 are onduru
, relaxed
1l (Md)

o
oo
m
1277/08 Easa 302 of Non- Sanction Male Guntur Dispo­ 437 &
Daniel IPC bailable ed sed 439 of
Cr.P.C.
l
ll

039 1304/08 Kantheti 448, 354 Non- Sanction Male Guntur Mala Dispo­ 437 &
Durga ofIPC bailable ed sed 439 of
1
Prasad @ i Cr.P.C.
Ankalu

323
 l
040 1305/08 Akula 302 R/W Cooli Non- Dismisse Male Ponnur Telag Dispo­ 437 &
Venkates 34 of bailable d 3 a sed 439 of
wara Rao IPC Guntur Cr.P.C.
&2 Dt.
Others

o
i—H
i
i
1305/1/0 Akula 302 R/W Cooli Non- Dismisse Male Ponnur Telag Dispo­ 437 &
8 Venkates 34 of bailable d a
3 sed 439 of
wara Rao IPC Guntur Cr.P.C.
&2 Dt.
i
Others

!
i
042 1305/2/0 Akula 302 R/W Cooli Non- Sanction Male Ponnur Telag Dispo­ 437 &
8 Venkates 34 of bailable ed 3 a sed 439 of
wara Rao IPC Guntur Cr.P.C.
&2 Dt.
Others
f
043 1305/3/0 Akula 302 R/W Cooli Non- Relaxed Bail condition Male Ponnur Telag Dispo­ 437 &
8 Venkates 34 of bailable imposed on 15- 3 a sed 439 of
wara Rao IPC i
10-2008 in Guntur Cr.P.C.
&2 Crl.M.P. Dt.
Others 1305/2/08 is
passed by this
court are relaxed
!

044 1321/08 Chennubo 366-A Agrieul Non- Dismisse Male Kogall Yada Dispo­ 437 &
ina IPC tural bailable d egudiv va sed 439 of
Venkates Labour ada Cr.P.C.
wara Rao (V),
Tenali
(Md)
324
 i
i
045 1321/1/0 Chennubo 366-A Agricul Non- Sanction Male Kogall Yada Dispo­ 437 &
8 ina IPC tural bailable ed egudiv va sed 439 of
Venkates Labour ada Cr.P.C.
wara Rap (V),
Tenali
(Md)

l
l
l
046 1328/08 Shaik 302 of Non- Dismisse Male Bethap Musli Dispo­ 437 &
Bilshad IPC bailable d udi m sed 439 of
(V), Cr.P.C.
Phiran
gipura
m(Md)

l
l
047 1328/1/0 Shaik 302 of Non- Dismisse Male Bethap Musli Dispo­ 437 &
8 Bilshad IPC bailable d udi m sed 439 of
(V), Cr.P.C.
Phiran
gipura
m (Md)

l
l
048 1328/2/0 Shaik 302 of Non- Sanction Male Bethap Musli Dispo­ 437 &
8 Bilshad IPC bailable ed udi m sed 439 of
1

t
1

(V), Cr.P.C.
Phiran
gipura
m (Md)
i
i
i

049 1329/08 Akkala 302, 309 House Non- Sanction Fema Karlap Redd Dispo­ 437 &
Koteswari of IPC wise bailable ed le alem y sed 439 of
Cr.P.C.

325
 1
l
l
050 1341/08 Gunja 302 R/W Non- Sanction Male Nakari Dispo­ 437 &
Kotaiah & 34 of bailable ed kallu sed 439 of
Another IPC Cr.P.C.

l
l
l
051 0511348 Banavath 302 of Non- Sanction Male Hanum Dispo­
/08 Hanumana. IPC
m m
t— o\

Sanction ed apuram sed

ik&
'si- ^ U
S'gU

ed (V),
Another Bellam
palli
(Md)

l
1
052 1359/08 Myneni 302 R/W Non- Dismisse Male Donda Dispo­ 437 &
Venkat 34 of bailable d padu sed 439 of
Rao @ IPC (V), Cr.P.C.
Venkata Thullur
1

Ramaiah u (Md)
& Another

1
l
l
053 1359/1/0 Myneni 302 R/W Non- Dismisse Male Donda Dispo­ 437 &
8 Venkat 34 of bailable d padu sed 439 of
Rao @ IPC (V), Cr.P.C.
Venkata Thullur
i
Ramaiah u (Md)
& Another
l
l
l

054 1360/08 Kola 302 of Non- Sanction Male Karlap Dispo­ 437 &
1

Nageswar IPC bailable ed alem sed 439 of

a Rao i

Cr.P.C.
l
l
l

055 1367/08 Jampani 302, 201

cd

Cooli Non- Dismisse Male Jampan Dispo­ 437 &

Santha Rao R/W 34 bailable d i
2 cde>0

sed 439 of
l
____________ 1
& 6 Others of IPC
Cr.P.C.
326
 j
l
056 1367/1/0 Jampani 302, 201 Cooli Non- Dismisse Male Jampan Madi Dispo­ 437 &
8 Santha R/W34 bailable dto A1 i ga sed 439 of
Rao & 6 ofIPC to A6 Cr.P.C.
Others and A7
is
sanction
ed

1
l
I
057 1367/2/0 Jampani 302,201 Cooli Non- Sanction Male Jampan Madi Dispo­ 437 &
8 Santha R/W34 bailable ed i ga sed 439 of
Rao & 5 ofIPC Cr.P.C.
Others
H3

058 1367/3/0 Jampani 302,201 Cooli Non- Sanction Bail condition Fama Jampan Dispo­ 437 &
8
*8 sj

Sunanda R/W34 bailable ed imposed on 24- le i

S m

sed 439 of
@ Ruthu ofIPC 9-2008 in Cr.P.C.
(A7) Crl.M.P.
1367/1/08 are
relaxed

1
i
i
059 1371/08 Gella 304-B of Non- Dismisse Male Guntur Cobb Dispo­ 437 &
Mariadas IPC bailable d ler sed 439 of
090 Cr.P.C.
1371/08 Gella 304-B of Non- Sanction Male Guntur Cobb Dispo­ 437 &
Mariadas IPC bailable ed ler sed 439 of
Cr.P.C.

327
BAIL APPLICATIONS FILED BEFORE THE PRINCIPAL DISTRIC JUDGE, GUNTUR IN THE YEAR 2009

ce
i
Crimi-

0
a
Name of Nature

P3
aSt
Occu- Bailable Bail is If bail is not Town Caste Sec.

6
<u
nal Mis-

©
'u
of pation or Non- sane- sanctioned, der appli- under

£ o
llaneous Accused Offence of Bailable tioned reasons, if any discri Village cation which

O
Petition

'Ts>

'w'
GA

Accu- Offence (or) Not mina- or city bail

Number Offence sed tion of the Dispo- appli-
charged j Accu- sed (or) cation
sed Not filed
Cl C2 CS

e
100 C4 CS C6 C7 C8 CIO cu C13 C14
1021/09 l
Battula 120(b), Non- Not No specific Male Nakari Dispo- 437 &

T“H
OO
4ft
Koteswear bailable Sanction grounds kallu, sed 439 of

T3
<U
aR ao 302,
O
u
P-J
u

mentioned for Narasa

r-H
in

&
N
R/W 149 dismissal other raopet
1
IPC. than the
Sec.27 grevious way
of Arms the A15

<
shooted the
deceased with
guns in Chirala
!
002 1022/09 Tota 420,468 Non- Not No reasons Male Nakari Dispos 438 of
Balarama of IPC. bailable Sanction mentioned for kallu,N sed Cr.P.C.
Venkata Sec.70 ed dismissal by arasara
Subrahma of EC the Non ’ble opet
nyam Act, Court
i
1955

328
003 1030/09 Babar 457,380 Non- Not No reasons Male Narasa Dispo­ 437 &
Sudarsan ofIPC bailable Sanction mentioned in raopet sed 439 of
Patil ed spite of Cr.P.C.
1
severalgrounds
asking for bail
by the acused
as he is only a
bead winner of
the family

jl
004 1053/09 Palli 120-B, Non- Sanction Male Pidugu Dispo­ 437 &
Tirupathai 121, 122 bailable ed ralla sed 439 of
ah ofIPC. Cr.P.C.
3.4,5.6
I
--------------- ES Act
005 1054/09 Kumala 420,468 Non- Sanction Bail is Male Narasa Dispo­ 438 of
Naga and bailable ed sanctioned on a raopet sed Cr.P.C.
Krishna Sec.7 of condition to
(A4) EC Act surrender the
petitioner
before II Addl.
Junior Civil
t

Judge,
900 Narasaraopet
1069/09 Konduru

n
Bailable Not Bail Male Tenali Dispo­ 437 &

oo
rH
Samsonu Sanction application sed 439 of

^
ff)
&8

c\
ed dismissed. No Cr.P.C.
Others

rs i
reasons

CN -
329
 452, 302 mentioned and
R/W 149 Crl.M.P.
IPC 1069/1/09
which is 2nd
bail application
is also
dismissed. But
in 1069/2/09,
bail application
allowed

-h
t>
1070/09

n
Kanuri Bailable Not Bail is Male Tenali Dispo­ 437 &

-h
oo
007 Sowri & 2 Sanction dismissed. i
sed 439 of

cn

't
Others ed This accused Cr.P.C.

tj-

(N
m
rv
filed

<N

CS
t>
successively,
j

m ,“H
H
o^
t>
>>
another three

H
CL
O
bail
s;.
applications
i.e. in
Crl.Mm.P.
i

1070/1/09,
1070/2/09,
1070/3/09. In
Crl.M..
1070/3/09, bail
application
allowed

330
008 1075/09 Shaik 457, 380 Non- Not No specific Male Narasa Dispo­ 437 &
Moulali ofIPC bailable Sanction reasons raopet sed 439 of
ed mentioned for Cr.P.C.
600 dismissal
1076/09 Yerram 302 and House Non- Not Bail is Fema Pidugu Dispo­ 437 &
Reddy 114IPC wife bailable Sanction dismissed. But le ralla sed 439 of
Tirupatam ed in Crl.M.P. Cr.P.C.
ma 1076/1/09 bail
is granted to
the accused

CD
o
1077/09 Shaik 302 IPC Mutton Non- Not Accused Male Medik Dispo­ 437 &
Ahamad Busine bailable Sanction applied for bail onduru sed 439 of
Basha ss ed in Crl.M.P. Cr.P.C.
1077/1/09,
1077/2/09,
1077/3/09 i.e.
for four times
he applied for
i bail. But all
the bail
i

applications
I

dismissed
taking into the
brutality of
murder by
pouring oil on
the deceased
331
O
r—H
r*—H
1084/09

l\
K. Janesu Consta Non- Not After three Male Tenali Dispo­ 437 &

oo
^
@

A
ble bailable Sanction successive bail sed 439 of

rj
f\
Gnanesu ed applications in Cr.P.C.

l\
Crl.MJP.

o
(\
1084/3/2009,

cn i~~f
<n 2^
bail is

l> (J
f ■ K >n fS N S Q,
sanctioned to
the accused

o
(N
r—H
t—(
!

^
1092/09

«\
1
Konduru Non- Not Bail is not Male Tenali Dispo­ 437 &
i

r—1
«S
Sangeetha bailable Sanction sanctioned. sed 439 of
i

Rao (A4) ed Again this Cr.P.C.

m
N
C\
*\
accused

<n
o

(N in
applied for bail

*\

^S
2nd time in

Cu

O
P5 (h
1092/1/09. It
was also
dismissed and
for 3rd time in
Crl.M.P.
1092/2/09, bail
application
granted to
accused. But,
no specific
i
grounds
mentioned for 1

previous
dismissal
332
o
r-H
m
1097/09 Jadda 307 IPC Agricul Non- Not The petitioner Male Vinuko Dispo­ 437 &
Venkates turist bailable Sanction applied for bail nda sed 439 of
warlu ed for three Cr.P.C.
successive times
respectively,
Crl.M.P.
1097/1/09 and
1097/2/09 but
all the three
times the
petition was
dismissed
because, if
i
accused is
1
released there is
i
t

every chance of
tampering the
L_ _____________________________ witness.

o
rH
1114/09 Yellaturi 406, Cultiva Non- Not The bail Male Bapatla Dispo­ 437 &
Veerabhad 420, of tion bailable Sanction application is sed 439 of
raRao IPC and ed dismissed. Cr.P.C.
Sec.7 of
EC Act

O
V)
1115/09 Kaku- 406,420 Agricul Non- Not Bail Male Bapatla Dispo­ 437 &
manu of IPC i
turist bailable Sanction application sed 439 of
Nages- and ed dismissed as Cr.P.C.
wara Rao Sec.7 of investigation is
EC Act in progress

333
016 1116/09 Palaparthi 302 Non- Not Bail Male Vinuko Dispo­ 437 &
Ramesh bailable Sanction application of nda sed 439 of
Babu ed this accused Cr.P.C.
dismissed. He
applied 2nd bail
application
again it was
dismissed as
the brutality of
murder of his
wife by setting
fire on her was
taken into
consideration.
Crl.M.P.
1116/1/09 was
rejected.
017 1117/09 G. 307,324 Mandal Non- Not Memo filed by Male Guraza Dispo­ 437 &
Srinivasa R/W34 Counse bailable Sanction the petitioners la sed 439 of
Reddy IPC llor of ed counsel not Cr.P.C.
Telugu pressing the
Desam petition.
Party Hence, the
petition is
dismissed as
not pressed.

334
 1-H
o
oo
I
1118/09 ; Rekha 147, Non- Sanction Male Manch Dispo­ 437 &
China 148, 307 bailable ed erala sed 439 of
Innaiah R/W 149 Cr.P.C.
IPC

O
r—<
l

Os
1119/09 B. 120(B), Leader Non- Sanction Male Narasa Dispo­ 437 &
Koteswara 147, of bailable ed raopet sed 439 of
Rao 148,302 Congre Cr.P.C.
R/W 149 ss I
IPC Party,
i

Manch
erala
Assem
bly
Segme
nt since
: 17
years)
020 1127/09 Aanati 302 Agricul Non- Not Bail is Male Medik Dispo­ 437 &
Ajay Babu turist bailable Sanction dismissed that onduru sed 439 of
@ ed investigation is Cr.P.C.
Appaiah in progress and
that he granted
bail in Crl.M.P.
1127/1/09.
l
l
I

021 1128/09 Banawath 302 R/W Non- Sanction Male Manch Dispo­ 437 &
Ravi 34 of bailable ed erala sed 439 of
IPC Cr.P.C.
335
 |
022 1129/09 K. Srinu 307,324 All are Non- Sanction All Jattipal Dispo­ 437 &
&4 R/W34 Congre bailable ed are em (V) sed 439 of
Others ofEPC ss I Male Cr.P.C.
Assista
nee
worker
s
023 1140/09 Lingisetty 498-A & Non- Not As petitioner Male Guntur Dispo­ 437 &
Srinivasa 307 bailable Sanction was arrested sed 439 of
Rao ed during Cr.P.C.
investigation
he was not
granted bail
and afterwards
in 2nd bail
application
i

Crl.M.P.

-
1140/1/09 the
bail was
granted
024 1141/09 Avula 147, All are Non- Not All the All Vinuko Dispo­ 437 &
Venkata 148, agricult bailable Sanction petitioners are are nda sed 439 of
Ramaiah 323,307 urists ed granted bail in Male Cr.P.C.
& 15 R/W 149 Crl.M.P.
Others IPC 1141/1/09
025 1142/09 Shaik 302 Non- Not Bail Male Narasa Dispo­ 437 &
Saida bailable - Sanction application raopet sed 439 of
ed dismissed and Cr.P.C.
336
 S
was granted
bail in Crl.M.P.
1142/1/09 after
investigation is
completed

1
l
l
026 1147/09 Lingisetty 498-A & House Non- Sanction A2 is Guntur Dispo­ 437 &
Nageswar 307 IPC wives bailable ed Fema sed 439 of
amnia & le and Cr.P.C.
Another A3 is
(A2& Male
A3)

l
l
l
027 1148/09 Dobbakuti 354 Non- Sanction Male Varlap Dispo­ 437 &
Naga Raju bailable ed alem, sed 439 of
Bapatla Cr.P.C.

l
l
l
028 1149/09 Murugula 307 R/W All are Non- Sanction All Krosur Dispo­ 437 &
Yesobu & 34 support bailable ed are u, sed 439 of
4 others ers of Male Sattena Cr.P.C.
Telugu palli
Desam
Party
1
l
l

029 1150/09 K. 302 Non- Sanction Male Old Dispo­ 437 &
Subrahma bailable ed Guntur sed 439 of
nya Raju Cr.P.C.
■

030 1156/09 K. Kiran

o

367 / 34 Non- Not Bail is not Male Tenali

a

437 &
Kumari
•S3 ^

of IPC bailable Sanction sanctioned s

Q 8.

439 of
i
ed the Cr.P.C.
investigation is
1

in progress.
337
 They granted
bail for 2nd bail
application in
Crl.MLP.
1156/1/09.

o
r—<
co
1157/09 Chandrika 307 & Student Non- Not Bail is not Male Tenali i Dispo­ 437 &
Haribabu R/W34 bailable Sanction sanctioned as sed 439 of
ed accused posed Cr.P.C.
the college girl
students as the
investigation is
in progress.
The accused
granted bail
afterwards in
i [ 1157/1/09.

m
.
032 1165/09

rs
Chinnabai Cooli Non- Not Bail is granted Male Mangal Dispo­ 437 &

't Tf
r\
bailable Sanction for 2nd agiri sed 439 of

< ’—i i—•

ed application in Cr.P.C.

oo't
r>
Crl.M.P.

r\
1165/1/09

CO

co co Ph
^

N O S cl
n
> U

o
CO
CO
CO
1182/09 Sampati Muta Non- Not No specific Male Pattabh Dispo­ 437 &

^ <!
Venkata Cooli bailable Sanction reasons ipuram, sed 439 of

'O h-
Rama ed mentioned for Guntur Cr.P.C.

CO CO CO CO
Krishna

^ cT
dismissal

n
CL,
MD cf v5" O
338
034 1192/09 Meda 302 R/W All are Non- Not Bail Male Tenali Dispo­ 437 &
Vaikunta 3 4 IPC agricult bailable Sanction application sed 439 of
m&3 ure ed dismissed. But Cr.P.C.
others cooli in Crl.M.P.
1192/1/09,
accused No.4
granted bail
and in Crl.M.P.
1192/2/09
accused No.2
granted bail
and remaining
1 & 3 granted
bail in Crl.M.P.
1193/3/09
035 1193/09 Talathoti 307 R/W Student Non- Not As the Male Tenali Dispo­ 437 &
Sudhakar 34 ' bailable Sanction investigation is sed 439 of
ed in progress as Cr.P.C.
this is a case of
eve-teasing the
Hon ’ble Court
did not find
correct to grant
bail. Second
bail application
in Crl.M.P.
1193/1/09 is
also dismissed
339
 l
036 1198/09 V. 147, Non- Sanction Male Guraza Dispo­ 437 &
Veeresam 148, 302 bailable ed la sed 439 of
IPC Cr.P.C.

jl
037 1199/09 Konduru 307,324 Politica Non- Sanction Male Guraza Dispo­ 437 &
l Veera R/W34 1Party bailable ed la sed 439 of
Reddy IPC support Cr.P.C.
er

0
CO
00
1200/09 Guntapalli Non- Not Bail is dismissed Male Manch Dispo­ 437 &
Srinivasa bailable Sanction as the erala sed 439 of

co '“H
o ^
r- g
Rao ed investigation is Cr.P.C.

' rs -hja*, .

C- oo E> O
in progress. The
second bail
application in
Crl.M.P.
1200/1/09 is
also dismissed.
039 1201/09 Kokkila- 354 House Non- Sanction Petition is Fema Chebro Dispo­ 437 &
gadda wife bailable ed allowed le lu sed 439 of
Vijayamma
Cr.P.C.

1
H
tj-
040 1206/09 Gorantla All are Non- Not Bail is dis­ Male Chilak Dispo­ 437 &

OO
Srinivasa Agricul bailable Sanction missed. The aluripet sed 439 of

*v._ r,...
t~-
Rao & 7 ture ed petitioners Cr.P.C.
others Cooli applied for bail
for another two

P O
times, i.e. in

'■£
0 5 a 0

^ cs S pi ^
^ ^ § -wo
Crl.M.P.

—■-- - - -

y*
rt CO M H CO H
r/s
1206/1/09 and
1206/2/09. In

.--------—
.. .
1206/2/09, ah
340
 the petitioners
granted bail as
they cannot
tamper wit­
nesses of
prosecution
even though
they released at
this stage

o
t—H
1207/09 Challa 420, Worker Non- Not As the offence Male Peda Hind Dispo­ 437 &
China 376, 506 in bailable Sanction involve the Kakani u sed 439 of
Pitchaiah IPC Mustaf ed sexual abuse, Cr.P.C.
fa die petition
Tobacc dismissed as the
0 investigation is
Compa in progress. In
Crl.M.P.
ny j

1207/1/09 the
accused released
on bail
042 1212/09 Koki 1302 Non- Not As the accused Male Bapatla Redd Dispo­ 437 &
Narayana bailable Sanction murdered his y sed 439 of
Reddy ed wife, if he Cr.P.C.
releases
i
previous the
investigation is
completed it
may effect the
I case. So, the
petition is
341
 dismissed. But,
the petition is
allowed in
Crl.M.P.
1212/1/09

l
1
i

VO
043 1213/09 Kommine Survey Non- Sanction Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ 437 &

r>
niVeera or bailable ed u sed 439 of

fi
Raghavaia Cr.P.C.

OOVO
©
n
h

<n 3.:
0\ oo On C>
hS*
Ph m
l
i
t
044 1214/09 Davala 306 IPC Non- Sanction Male Chebro Dispo­ 437 &
Babu Rao bailable ed lu sed 439 of
Babu Cr.P.C.

l
l
1045 1215/09 Ballineni 354, 323 Agricul Non- Sanction Male Bapatla Chris Dispo­ 437 &
Jojjaya R/W34 turist bailable ed tian sed 439 of
of IPC Cr.P.C.
046 1216/09 Narra Non- Not As the peti­ All Bapatla Yada Dispo­ 437 &

©
Srinivasa bailable Sanction tioners can are i
va sed 439 of

<N ^.
Rao (A1 ed tamper the Male Cr.P.C.

mos£
m m p? P
prosecution

^O
i .
to A8)
witnesses as it is
a intercommunal
rivalry. The
petition is
dismissed. In
Crl.M.P.
1216/1/09 it was
allowed.
342
 i
i
l
047 1218/09 Bollineni 354, 323 Preside Non- Sanction Male Pedana Chris Dispo­
Francis & 34 of nt of bailable ed ndipad tian sed
IPC
m cn rH
't't O
t> ON ^

PACS u
048 1221/09 Shaik 302 Non- Not No specific Male Gundla Musli Dispo­ 437 &
Saida bailable Sanction grounds palli m sed 439 of
ed mentioned for Cr.P.C.
dismissal
049 1234/09
£
1
Chimata 302, 379
cd

Non- Not No specific Male Sattena Dispo­ 437 &

$
ft.

Alarasaiah R/W 511 bailable Sanction grounds palli sed 439 of

& Another & 34 ed mentioned Cr.P.C,
other than
investigation is
in progress
050 1235/09 Naidu 302,201 House Non- Not Bail is dismissed Fema Mangal Dispo­ 437 &
Subbayam & 498-A wife bailable Sanction as the le agiri sed 439 of
ma ed investigation is Cr.P.C.
going on and in
Crl.M.P. |

; 1235/1/09 bail is
i
granted

o
r ■"<
<N
o
NO
ON
Nannapan 302 R/W Non- Not Bail is dismissed All Tenali Dispo­ 437 &
eni 34 bailable Sanction as the petitioners are sed 439 of
Krishna ed can tamper the Male Cr.P.C.
Chaitanya prosecution
&2 witnesses. But,
Others i
in Crl.M.P.
1236/1/09 they
granted bail. All
granted bail.
343
052 1237/09 Veesam 302 House Non- Not As it is a Fema Guntur Dispo­ 437 &
Subbamm wife bailable Sanction harassment le sed 439 of
a ed case of Cr.P.C.
petitioner on
daughter-in-
law. The bail
cannot be
granted until i

j
investigation is
completed. In
Crl.M.P.
1237/1/09
petitioner
granted bail
053 1250/09 Borugadd 306, Non- Not As the Male ABG Dispo­ 437 &
a 498-A bailable Sanction investigation is Palem, sed 439 of
Dayaratna IPC ed in progress and Pedana Cr.P.C.
m granted bail in ndipad
Crl.M.P. u
1250/1/09
054 1259/09 Soma 366’A ’ Non- Not But, bail is Male Gandal Redd Dispo­ 437 &
Brahma IPC bailable Sanction sanctioned in aiahpet y sed 439 of
.
Reddy ed Crl.M.P. 9 Cr.P.C.
1259/1/09 to Mangal
the accused agiri
l
ll

055 1273/09 Anguluri 302 IPC Non- Sanction Male Phiran Hind Dispo­ 437 &
Naga Raju bailable ed gipura u sed 439 of
m Cr.P.C.
 C"
056 1274/09 Karumanc Agricul Non- Not As it is a case Male Dispo­ 438 of

O tJ-
m m
hi

111£
turist bailable Sanction of attack on sed Cr.P.C.
Raghaven (A2) ed injured
dra persons.
Accused is as
trying to
protect from
arrest after
attack. The
petition is
dismissed.
057 1275/09 Manam 302 R/W Non- Not Bail is granted Male Chilak Dispo­ 437 &
Ramanam 34 i bailable Sanction in Crl.M.P. aluripet sed 439 of
ma ed 1275/1/09 Cr.P.C.
058 1293/09 Yarlagadd 302 R/W All are Non- Not Bail is granted A1 Tenali Kam Dispo­ 437 &
a 34 cooli bailable Sanction only to A3. and ma sed 439 of
Ramanjan ed Other two A2 Cr.P.C.
eyulu & refused to grant are
20 others bail even for Male
the second and A3 is
third time in Fema
Crl.M.P. le
1293/1/09 and
1293/2/09
respectively _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ i

345
059 1347/09 Pittamalla 307 R/W A2 is Non- Not Bail is granted All Sitam Hind Dispo­ 437 &
Bala 34 of doing bailable Sanction to accused are ma u sed 439 of
Krishna @ IPC Mansar ed No.2 and 3 and Male Colony Cr.P.C.
1

i
Balu & 2 y work accused No. 1 j

others is not granted Guntur

bail as only
asking the due
amount by
injured he
become angry
and got
attacked that
090 person
1348/09 Kesaboina 147, Non- Sanction Male Guraza Dispo­ 437 &
Amarlinga 148, 307 bailable ed i
la sed 439 of
i
m R/W 149 Cr.P.C.

1
l
061 1349/09 Meka 354, 506 Non- Sanction Male Karam Hind Dispo­ 437 &
Tirupathi R/W 34 bailable ed pudi u sed ; 439 of
Reddy of IPC Cr.P.C.
i

(Al) 1

<N
O
062 1350/09 Yerram Non- Sanction In Crl.M.P. Male Pidugu Hind Dispo­ 437 &

T—t
CO 1-H
Reddy bailable ed 1350/1/09 the ralla u sed 439 of
accused was Cr.P.C.
granted bail
063 1351/09 K. All are Non- Not As it is a case of All Chilak Yada Dispo­ 437 &

t-h
Srinivasu Agricul bailable Sanction political rivalry are aluripet va sed 439 of

^ <n
o
m
ro
t"
the Hon’ble

1"-" oc t}-
and Others I
tural ed Male Cr.P.C.
346
 i—4
Q\
(A9 to cooli Court opined tht
A ll) the release on
bail, will tamper
the prosecution
witnesses.
064 1357/09 Chadamal 302 Non- Not Bail application Male Pelasan Dispo­ 437 &
a Rosaiah bailable Sanction for 1st and 2nd igandla sed 439 of
ed time in Crl.M.P. 5 Cr.P.C.
1351/1/09 is Guraza
also dismissed la
as it is a case of i

blunt pre-planed
murder

1
i
065 1358/09 Shaik 306 Non- Sanction Male Pidugu Musli Dispo­
Jhony bailable ed ralla m sed
Basha
U
m m rh<
C" 0\ ^

990

l
i
l
1359/09 Thumugu 498-A, Busine Non- Sanction Male Tenali Dispo­ 437 &
ntla 307 IPC ss bailable ed sed 439 of
i

Krishna Cr.P.C.
Prasad
067 1360/09 Vemuri 143, Bailable Sanction All the accused Male Utukur Dispo­ 437 &
Veerasam 147, ed from A1 to u, sed 439 of
323, 506 A12 granted Nalgon Cr.P.C.
R/W 149 bail under da Dt.
& : Crl.M.P. Nos.
Sec.811 1361/09,
of Apps 1362/09 and
1
Act.! 1363/09.

347
068 1369/09 Patan 302,201 Non- Not In Crl.M.P. Male Narasa Musli Dispo­ 437 &
Khan R/W34 bailable Sanction 1369/2/09 for raopet m sed 439 of
Babu @ ofIPC ed the third Cr.P.C.
Babu application he
was granted
690 bail
1370/09 Lingambat 302 Non- Sanction Male Chebro Hind Dispo­ 437 &
i bailable ed le (V) u sed 439 of
Sambaiah Cr.P.C.
070 1371/09 T.V. 323, 506 Bailable Sanction All Dispo­ 437 &
Subba Rao R/W34 ed are sed 439 of
and 4. IPC Male Cr.P.C.
Others

o
r~H
t-
1383/09 Shaik 302 A1 is Non- Not No specific Both Bapatla Musli Dispo­ 437 &
Karimulla Auto bailable Sanction grounds are m sed 439 of
h& Driver, ed mentioned in Male Cr.P.C.
Another A2 is Crl.M.P.
Cooli 1383/1/09 they
were granted
bail
jl
•

072 1384/09 Ganji 302; 379 Non- Sanction Male Peda Vadd Dispo­ 437 &
Rambabu bailable ed Kakani era sed 439 of
Cr.P.C.
ij

o
073 1385/09 Mandla Non- Sanction Male Remidi Dispo­ 437 &

cn W
■'fr

o s
China bailable ed charla sed 439 of
Tirupathai (V) Cr.P.C.
ah
348
°
"sT
1386/09 Atla China 302 Non- Even 2ndbail *
ro
Not Male Karlap Redd Dispo­
Venkates bailable Sanction application in alem y sed
t> Os
wara Crl.M.P.
"
U
m rh<
ed
Reddy 1386/1/09 is not
granted. 3rd
application
1386/2/09 is
granted
075 1399/09 Y erram 302, Cultiva Non Not Bail is not Male Linga Hind Dispo­ 437 &
Srinivasa 498-A tion Sanction granted as mguntl u sed 439 of
Reddy IPC ed investigation is a, Cr.P.C.
in progress and Narasa
2n° bail
raopet
application in
Crl.M.P.
1399/1/09 was
allowed.
076 1400/09 Sanagapap 147, Non Sanction Male Pidura Dispo­ 437 &
pu Sreenu 148, 302 ed galla sed 439 of
(A2) R/W 149 Cr.P.C.
077 1422/09 Kesaboina Non

cv
Not Bail is granted Male Rentac Dispo­ 437 &

.
o
r- oo
Narayana Sanction in Crl.M.P. hintala sed 439 of

m 1—1
r-~. 0\
(Al) ed 1422/1/09 as (Md), Cr.P.C.

---------

Q.
Q
-i -i ft H
the Guraza
investigation la
completed
.

078 1423/09 Y. Non Sanction Male Pidugu Dispo­ 437 &

°
Narayana ed ralla sed 439 of

cn ^1
<n 25

5?
Cr.P.C.
349
079 1434/09 Kavuri 366-A Non Not As the offence Male Vedull Dispo­ 437 &
Kameswar R/W34 Sanction involved is of apalli sed 439 of
a Reddy IPC ed moral Cr.P.C.
turpitude, even
2nd bail
application in
Crl.M.P.
!
1434/1/09 is
9
also dismissed

fl
l

o
oo
o
i 1443/09 Palaparthi 302 Emplo Non Sanction Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ 437 &
Sambaiah yee ed u sed 439 of
Cr.P.C.

l
l

o
oo
r-H
1441/09 Nallaguntl 302,379 Painter Non Sanction Male Peda Hind Dispo­ 437 &
a Bala R/W34 ed Kakani u sed 439 of
KOtaiah Cr.P.C.
082 1451/09 Korepalli 302 and Non Not In Crl.M.P. Male Tadepa Dispo­ 437 &
l

Chandra 201 IPC Sanction 1451/1/09 the Hi sed 439 of

Sekhar ed petition is Cr.P.C.
allowed
083 1454/09 Kattupalli 302 Non Not As this is a case Male Repalle Dispo­ 437 &
Ratna Sanction where father-in- sed 439 of
Raju ed law murdered Cr.P.C.
son-in-law there
is every chance
of tampering the
witnesses. Even
2ndbail applica­
tion was
 dismissed only
3rd application
1454/2/09 was
allowed after
investigation is
completed
084 1478/09 Shaik 147,148, Money Non Not Bail sanctioned Male Narasa Musli Dispo­ 437 &
Babu 363,302, lending Sanction for the 3rd raopet m sed 439 of
120(B) busines ed application in Cr.P.C.
R/W 149 s 1478/1/09
IPC
085 1493/09 D. 302 Busine Non Not Bail Male Pidigur Redd Dispo­ 437 &
Venkata ss Sanction application is alia y sed 439 of
i

Ramana ed sanctioned in Cr.P.C.

i
Crl.M.P.
1493/1/09

o
oo
VO
1510/09 Govathoti 302, Non Not No specific Male Repalle Dispo­ 437 &
Musalaiah 307, Sanction grounds sed 439 of
& Another 354, 324 ed mentioned Cr.P.C.
i

(A6& R/W 34
_A7)______ IPC
087 1511/09 Mailavara 302 Non Not In Crl.M.P. Male Manch Dispo­ 437 &
pu Sanction 1511/09, erala sed 439 of
Sambaiah ed 1511/1/09 and Cr.P.C.
1511/2/09 also
bail applica­
j
tions dismissed
o
oo
oo
<N
o
,'3r
1513/09 a Non Not As Male Vinuko Dispo­ 437 &

<N .

P5
m^

mS
fo
^
Kotaiah Sanction investigation is nda sed 439 of
ed in progress, the Cr.P.C.
petitioner was
not granted
bail. In
I

Crl.M.P.
1513/1/09 he
was granted
bail

o
o
089 1533/09 Kallam Proprie Non Sanction Male Sattena Redd Dispo­ 438 of
Gangadha tor of ed palli y sed Cr.P.C.

^
ra Reddy Rice
i.

Mill

tJ- <^5 t> O <

^ W -«
&... Cf.o....
i
l
l

o
o
Q\
1534/09 Kandula 302,201 Non Sanction Male Sattena Hind Dispo­ 437 &
Sambasiva IPC ed palli u sed 439 of
Rao Cr.P.C.

o
o>\
£
1537/09 Singadi 406, Cultiva Non No specific Male Sattena Telag Dispo­ 437 &
Venkates 409,420 tion grounds palli a sed 439 of
warulu of IPC mentioned Cr.P.C.

.
<N
-a
£
092 1538/09 Sammeta Cultiva Non As Male Peda Redd Dispo­ 437 &

m cn
r-i
O O
Anjaneyul tion investigation is Kakani y sed 439 of
u Reddy in progress. Cr.P.C.

____
Bail is granted t

in 1538/1/09
o
as
CO
cs
%

C\
1545/09 Palakiti Non As the release Fema Tenali Rajak Dispo­ 437 &

rq
O
fS
Hymavath of accused may le a sed 439 of

■'rnT
i tamper Cr.P.C.

OOOS(H
Q

co co P4 O
o> R
prosecution
witness. In
Crl.M.P.
1545/1/09
accused was
granted bail

!i

©
Os
1574/09 Gajjala 302 and Non Sanction Male Manch Redd Dispo­ 437 &
Dharma 201 IPC ed erala y sed 439 of
Reddy Cr.P.C.

353
BAIL APPLICATIONS FILED BEFORE I-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, GUNTUR IN THE YEAR 2007

!Z!
£
<u
Crimi- Name of Occu-

i
Bailable Bail is If bail is not Gen- Town Caste Bail Sec.

£
S
4>
Cm
nal Mis-

O'
pation or Non- sane-

3
'In'
sanctioned, der appli- under

o
O
cm
llaneous Accused Offence Bailable tioned reasons, if any discri Village cation which
Petition

3
GO

Accu- Offence (or) Not mina- or city bail

Number Offence sed tion of the Dispo- appli-
charged Accu- sed (or) cation

as
<U
T3
Not filed

o
OQ
Cl
100 C2 C3 C4 C6 \ C9 CIO C ll C13 C14
604/07 Jadi Raja 354 IPC Asst. Non- Not The accused has Male Gurajal Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Ram Divisio bailable Sanction committed a a u sed 438 of
nal ed serious offence Cr.P.C.
Engine to have lust, so
er, that the act itself
APSP would not
DCL, warrant to use
exceptional
Gurajal
discretionary to
a admit the
!
petitioner to
anticipatory bail
002 612/07 Donkena Non- Not In Crl.M.P. Male Bapatla Dispo­ Sec.

r—i «—i
OO
Brahmaia bailable Sanction 612/1/07 bail is sed 438 of

M
m
h ed granted Cr.P.C.

m co
m^pH. M.

i
C\
r? P-t

O 't
354
 ©
'O
c-~
003 Dasari 304-B Non- Not As Both Bapatla Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Ravi and and 201 bailable Sanction investigation is are u sed 437 &
ip c !
another ed in progress, the Male 439 of
Hon’ble Court s Cr.P.C.
thinks thinks
that if the
accused
released on bail
he would
tamper the
prosecution
witnesses but
in Crl.M.P.
672/2/07 bail is
granted

l
i
l
004 673/07 Ontipuli 306 Non- Sanction A1 Sattena Hind Dispo­ Sec.
China bailable ed and palli u sed 437 &
Veera A3 439 of
Raju and are Cr.P.C.
three Male
others sA2
and
A4
are
i
Fema
les

355
005 688/07 P. 354 Non- Not As taking into Male Sattena Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Subbaiah bailable Sanction consideration palli u sed 437 &
ed as the nature of 439 of
offence and its Cr.P.C.
seriousness
bail is not
granted. Butin
Crl.M.P.
688/1/07 bail is
granted

i
T3

006 692/07
^
cd

Murikipud 366, 343 Non- Sanction Male Sattena Dispo­ Sec.

_
cd

i China bailable ed palli sed 437 &

Ramaiah 439 of
Cr.P.C.

!
007 716/07 Kalinta 448, All are Non- Sanction All Tenali Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Agastin 354, Cultiva bailable ed are u sed 437 &
and 4 323, 506 tors Male 439 of
others R/W34 s Cr.P.C.

o
o
<N
oo
o
c~~
c=>
Badugu 498-A Doctor Non- Sanction Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Siva Jagan bailable ed u sed 437 &
439 of
600 LO/ZZL Cr.P.C.
Donthaga 376,417 Cood Non- Not The Hon’ble Male Guntur Gow Dispo­ Sec.
ni Srinu IPC bailable Sanction Court thinks da sed 437 &
ed that if the 439 of
l

petitioner is Cr.P.C.
i
i i
released on bail
356
 he would
tamper the
prosecution
witness. In
Crl.M.P.
722/2/07 bail is
granted after
trial is
completed

1
l
l
010 729/07 Yaminani 448/ Non- Sanction Male Tenali Gow Dispo­ Sec.
Sambaiah 354, 506 bailable ed da sed 437 &
ofIPC 439 of
Cr.P.C.

T—

O
H
730/07 Bhashyam 147, Agricul Non- Not As the inquest Male Sattena Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Jagadish 148, turist bailable Sanction report is yet to palli u sed 437 &
324, ed be clearly 439 of
307, 302 presented by Cr.P.C.
R/W 149 the Police the
i

j
bail is not
sanctioned. 1

But after one

month in
Crl.M.P.
730/1/07 bail is
granted

oo
<
012 734/07 Pothuru Non- Not As the Both Guntur Musli Dispo­ Sec.
Rahamath bailable Sanction investigation is are ms sed 438A
ulla and ed pending and males of
357
 another prima-facie Cr.P.C.
case is there
the bail is not
granted

O
T—H
cn
740/07 Thammise 354 Fruit Non- Not There is every Male Gunta Hind Dispo­ Sec.
tty Gowry busines bailable Sanction chance of u sed 437 &
Sankar s ed tampering 439 of
witnesses. Cr.P.C.
Hence the bail
is not
sanctioned.
But in Crl.M.P.
740/1/07 bail is
sanctioned

|
014 741/07 Siddla 354, 323 Non- Sanction Male Kollipa Madi Dispo­ Sec.
i

Krupa Rao IPC bailable ed ra, ga sed 437 &

Tenali 439 of
Cr.P.C.

e'­
en
VO
015 742/07 Amarthalu Non- Not As the Vemur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
<L> /

ri Yohan bailable Sanction investigation is 'u, u sed 437 &

ed in progress. Tenali 439 of
But in Crl.M.P. Cr.P.C.
742/2/07 bail is
sanctioned, it
means a third
bail application
o
r—H
VO
748/07 Tati 376 Cooli Non- Not As there is Male Mangal Yada Dispo­ Sec.
Srinivas bailable Sanction prima-facie agiri va sed 437 &
Rao ed case bail is not 439 of
sanctioned. Cr.P.C.
The third bail i

application in
Crl.M.P.
748/2/07 was
L0/£9L sanctioned.

O
rH
o
!
K. 448, Non- Sanction Male Mangal Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Venkates 354,323 bailable ed agiri u sed 437 &
warlu 439 of
Cr.P.C.

1
—
o
1
oo
764/07 Nalapati 498-A, Non- Not No specific A1 & Guntur Chris 'Dispo ­ Sec.
Nirmala 306 R/W bailable Sanction reasons A5 tians sed 437 &
Mary & 5 34 ed mentioned for are 439 of
others dismissal. But Fema Cr.P.C.
in Crl.M.P. les &
764/1/07 bail is All
sanctioned are
Male
s

t
o
<
OV
765/07 Bandaru Non- Not As the other All Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.

s°
Jevan bailable Sanction accused were are u sed 437 &
Kumar & ed absconding, the males 439 of
2 others petitioner is not Cr.P.C.
granted with
359
 bail. Even the
third bail
application in
Crl.M.P.
765/2/07 also
bail is not
granted

C~-
020 Chilaka 366 Non- Not As the All Repalle Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Ratna bailable Sanction petitioners will are u sed 437 &
Kumar ed tamper the males 439 of
and prosecution Cr.P.C.
another witnesses the
bail is not
granted. But
after the
completion of
i

trail of
prosecution
witnesses, the
third bail
i • '

application in
Crl.M.P.
i
772/2/07 the
bail is granted.

<N
rH

O
773/07 Nakka 376, Non- Not As the Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Srinivasa 420, 313 bailable Sanction investigation is u sed 437 &
Rao ed in progress bail 439 of

|
i ‘ is not granted
i
Cr.P.C.
360
 r-~
l
ll

o
r-
o
;
022 Nissankar 354 Non- Sanction Male Guntur Kapu Dispo­ Sec.
arao bailable ed sed 437 &
Nanda 439 of
Kishore Cr.P.C.

l
1
023 782/07 Sk. 366,342 Non- Sanction Male Chilak Musli Dispo­ Sec.
Mastan bailable ed aluripet m sed 437 &
Vali 439 of
Cr.P.C.
024 783/07 Chava 354, 509 Work­ Non- Not No specific Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Basu ing as bailable Sanction grounds u sed 438 of
Deputy ed mentioned for Cr.P.C,
Direc­ dismissal
tor,
Akshar
Deepthi i

l
ll

oo
o
©
r-
025 Anna 498-A Non- Sanction Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Venkata R/W34 bailable ed u sed 437 &
Chalapati IPC 439 of
Rao Cr.P.C.

oo
o
oo
©
026 Peripogu 147, Agricul Non- Not As the intention All Gurajal Hind Dispo­ Sec.
China 148, 307 tural bailable Sanction of accused was are a u sed 437 &
Amaraiah R/W 149 cooli ed clearly seen males 439 of
and 5 IPC from the facte of Cr.P.C.
others the case to kill
the deceased,
the bail is not
i [
sanctioned

361
027 1106/07 Julumuri 341, Non- Not Bail is All Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Lakshmi 372, bailable Sanction sanctioned to are u sed 437 &
& 2 others 373, ed A2 and A4. males 439 of
366(A) A3 is Cr.P.C.
of IPC sanctioned bail
Sec.3 in Crl.M.P.
and 5 1106/1/07. A2
ITP Act and A4 granted
Interim Bail
Applications.
As per A3
investigation is
completed but
lateral stage
028 1107/07 Yannabath 147, Non- Not As A13 Male Chebro Hind Dispo­ Sec.
uni 148, bailable Sanction murdered the lu u sed 437 &.
Narasaiah 307, 302 ed Sarpunch of 439 of
(A 13) R/W 149 Chebrolu in the Cr.P.C.
IPC day light to
create terror in'
the village
people as per
the plan of A l,
the Hon’ble
Court thinks
the
grievousness of
362
 the murder and
sanctioned bail
before the trial.
But after
completion of
trial in
Crl.M.P.

*
1107/2/07, bail
was granted.
029 1086/07 Shaik 306 of Non- Not In this A1 is Narasa Musli Dispo­ Sec.
Badisa & IPC bailable Sanction application bail male raopet m sed 437 &
another ed is not granted as and 439 of
the investigation A2 is Cr.P.C.
is not femal
completed. But,
e
in Crl.M.P.
i

1086/1/07, A2 is
i granted bail as
her part of
investigation is
completed. A1
is granted bail in
Crl.M.P.
1086/2/07

^
030 1112/07

r*
Kuncham Non- Not Bail is Both Guntur Vadd Dispo­ Sec.

NN
Rambabu bailable Sanction sanctioned only are era sed 437 &

r*
& another ed for A1 and A5 is males 439 of

m co cn m
l> m 'O
(A1 & granted bail in
i
Cr.P.C.
i

A5) Crl.M.P.

\o - -
363
 1112/1/07. But
no specific
reasons
mentioned
expect the
investigation is
in progress

o
l
I1

ro
r*H
1115/07 Banavath 376 R/W Non- Sanction Both Sattena Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Nageswar 511 & bailable ed are palli u sed 437 &
aRao & 506 IPC males 439 of
another Cr.P.C.
(A1&
A2)

l
1l
032 1116/07 Rakesh Owner Non- Sanction Both Sattena Gow Dispo­ Sec.

co Pi
vo S
VO ^
Gowda & of bailable ed are palli da sed 437 &
another Hotel males 439 of
in Cr.P.C.
Krosur
u
033 1124/07 Ganjaboin 376-B Cultiva Non- Not Bail Male Bapatla Redd Dispo­ Sec.
a Subba tion bailable Sanction application y sed 437 &
Reddy ed dismissed 439 of
,
without any Cr.P.C.
specific
reasons. But in
Crl.M.P.
1124/1/07 bail
is sanctioned
364
 l
I
l
034 1129/07 Madivada 498-A, Non- Sanction Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Koti 420, bailable ed u sed 437 &
Nagulu 120-B, 439 of
354,323 Cr.P.C.
R/W 34
IPC
035 1139/07 Peddi 509, Non- Not As the accused Male Guntur Kam Dispo­ Sec.
Murali 506, 354 bailable Sanction may tamper the ma sed 437 &
IPC prosecution
ed 439 of
witnesses his bail
1 t

is dis-missed. Cr.P.C.
But in Crl.M.P.
1139/1/07 bail is
sanctioned

l
l
■

036 1140/07 Tumati 147,

o

Non- Sanction All

Ph

i
Vinuko Hind Sec.
Govindara 148,
q 8
.3 13

bailable ed are nda u 437 &

julu & 11 324, 307 males 439 of
others R/W 149 Cr.P.C.

|!

<
037 1141/07

c\
Goli Suppor Non- Sanction |AU Vinuko Hind Dispo­ Sec.

t-h
r' oo
Yedukond ters of bailable ed are nda u sed 437 &

co
r\
alu & 11 Congre males 439 of

o ^
r~*
2
others ss party Cr.P.C.

o
CO
oo
I

O
VO
1142/07 Shaik A1 is Non- Sanction A2 is Guntur Musli Dispo­ Sec.
painter

CO pH CO CO
Lihazuddi bailable ed femal m sed 437 &
and all
n& 3 e and 439 of
others
others all are Cr.P.C.
are
family
males
member
s

365
 iV*
1
l
l

O
MD
039 1143/07 Shaik Non- Sanction A1 is Guntur Musli Dispo­ Sec.

m m
Mastani & bailable ed femal m sed 437 &
2 others e and 439 of
! Cr.P.C.
A2
i

and
A3
are
males

'
3
o
o
1
l

-
l
1157/07 Abdul 498-A Non- Sanction Male Guntur Musli Dispo­ Sec.
Gafar bailable ed m sed 438 of
Cr.P.C.

o
r-—(
1163/07 Bathula 306 IPC Non- Sanction Male Peda Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Mohan bailable ed Kakani u sed 437 &
Rao 439 of
j

Cr.P.C.

!i
042 1164/07 Kollipara 304-B Non- Sanction Male Tenali Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Srinivasa R/W34 i bailable ed u sed 437 &
Rao 439 of
Cr.P.C.

"3-
o
1168/07 Deva Sri 323,' Non- Not Though, Male Guntur Visw Dispo­ Sec.
Sai Pavan 354, 506 bailable Sanction investigation is a sed 437 &
IPC ed completed, Brah 439 of
Charge-Sheet min Cr.P.C.
i

filed there is
fear of consider­
able damage to
family of
1

r
victims. Hence,
366
 accused is not to
released on bail
until trial of
prosecution is

'
completed but,
in Crl.M.P.
1168/1/07 bail is
granted

i
044 1175/07 Tumati 147, Student Non- Sanction Male Korech Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Galaiah & 148, of bailable ed aria u sed 438 of
another 324, 307 MCA (v), Cr.P.C.
R/W 149 Ipur
(md),
Guntur
Dt.

lll
045 1176/07 Mallela 304-B Non- Sanction Both Sattena Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Veeramm bailable ed are palli u sed 438 of
a& femal Cr.P.C.
another es

!i
046 Ponnam
io/an
306 Non- Sanction Male Chilak Hind Dispo­ Sec.
i
Venkates bailable ed aluripet u sed 437 &
warlu 439 of
Cr.P.C.
047 1178/07 Myla 498-A & Non- Not As per the order Male Sattena Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Suresh 306 IPC bailable Sanction in this applica­ palli u sed 437 &
Babu & ed tion the acused 439 of
another and has overt i Cr.P.C.
acts against the
victim and
367
 hence, the
Hon’ble Court
though to, not
release on bail

-
for some time.
But in Crl.M.P.
1178/2/07 bail is
sanctioned

i
i
l
048 1179/07 D. 306 P C Non- Sanction Male Macher Hind Dispo­ Sec.
i

Mallikaqu bailable ed la u sed 437 &

na Rao & 439 of
another Cr.P.C.

1
1
1

o
Ov
1190/07 Nudurapat 143, Non- Sanction All Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
i 323, 354 bailable ed are u sed 437 &
Chiranjee R/W 149 males 439 of
vi & 4 PC Cr.P.C.
others

1
050 1196/07 Vadapalli 143, Non- Sanction Male Guntur Mala Dispo­ Sec.
Punna Rao 323, 354 bailable ed sed 437 &
R/W 149 439 of
Cr.P.C.

1—H

o
i/~)
1197/07 Meduri 420,506 Non- Not “As the peti­ Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
;
Venkata IPC bailable Sanction tioners falsely u sed 438 of
Sree Rama ed collected money Cr.P.C.
Chandrud from defacto-
u eomplainant that
they will secure
jobs. It is not
fair to grant
368
 Anticipatory
Bail”, the
Hon’ble Court
opined.
052 1198/07 Golla Ezra 420 and Lecture Non- Not As the Male Bapatla Hind Dispo­ Sec.
506 R/W r bailable Sanction petitioner want u sed 438 of
34 ed to secure Cr.P.C.
themselves by
people from
whom they
collected
money that he
will secure
jobs, the bail is
not granted

i
i
i
053 1207/07 Kalidass 363, Rowdy Non- Sanction Male Tenali Hind Dispo­ Sec.
i

Venkates 366,109 Sheeter bailable ed u sed 437 &

warulu R/W 34 439 of
Cr.P.C.

i
t
i
054 1208/07 Gorika 354 Non- Sanction Male Tenali Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Sambaiah bailable ed u sed 437 &
439 of
Cr.P.C.
i
l
i

055 1246/07 Rayapudi 366-A Attend Non- Sanction Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Seshu R/W 34 er in bailable ed u sed 437 &
B.Ed. 439 of
college Cr.P.C.

369
 cJ ® 43
o :d —-' S3
O T3 >
BAIL APPLICATIONS FILED BEFORE I-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, GUNTUR IN THE YEAR 2008 u ’S s « g«:a ,2 a d t~- On d t> on
m S ^ a os S o co m o m m ,h;
(/!! Nf N}- U oo ^d- -d- O
1 I
33 33 § © o -m c*i o o
«S Q* •« .«« w © r*i (X Ck
M a « .S3 x) .S3 ^
«* « Q » r?
(—1 wco rN w
W «s
CD
GA T3 *d
Cl G d d
U W d ffi d
Village
or city

Accu ­
Town

of the

Realle

Guntu
CIO
(or)

sed
Gen ­

discr
mina

Male
As the petitioner Male
tion
der

C9

heintended to do
reasons, if any

away the life of

and one incised

investigation is
If bail is not

the victim girl,

sanctioned,

not completes
three injuries

1517/1/2008
has inflicted

granted but

sanctioned
injury and
C8

bail is not
dismissed
the bail is

Crl.M.P.
As the

bail is
«n . TS O d d
•o
*-< o
•4-*
fH
sg
« fi
M a ~ ts

370
O'J ^ §
M o
'w' cd -rt
Z CO o Z oo o
<u i a> o> <D <D
r.<
-S £ ■§ g >© 1, cd „ d
1 £ a g a .3
s I, a r 5 ’S3
CQ O PQ O Z .§
• a i D
;
Occu

Accu
patio

sional
sed

Gura-
a psp
Engi­
of

Divi­

2
Asst.

neer,

CL,

jala
!

<o
£ «
U «
U 'O
<U u |
S fl c o w> &.........
C4

’§-«-,g-S iS'-b...
C"- r-~
Z o o -S o o xr
m m m
o
*8 • "2 cd
« a
w
j-i *3
ecus
ame
the

C3

M cd cd
xl j§ a, a
Z ◄ O sj
PQ

i i 3 g « oo oo
C2

*5 ^ a S | oo
o
r-
T—<
n a a ©3 VD oo
W fl S3 Z
--------
zoo
Cl

5Z5 Z o o
o
1
003 1524/08 K. 306 Vice- Non- Not No specific Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Srinuvasa Princi­ bailable Sanction reasons u sed 437 &
Rao pal, ed mentioned for 439 of
Nalan- dismissal. In Cr.P.C.
da
Crl.M.P.
College
Guntur 1524/1/2008,
bail is granted
004 1534/08 K. Hari
'B

Centeri Non- Sanction Male Guntur Dispo­ Sec.

Babu
^ cd
ng bailable ed
60
sed 437 &

<n m m
't M iri
coolie 439 of

M
Cr.P.C.

W
fO

S
|
005 1535/08 Badugu 307, 324 Auto Non- Sanction Male Tenali Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Lakshmai Driver bailable ed u sed 437 &
ah 439 of
900 Cr.P.C.
1542/08 Kota 307 Coolie Non- Not If the petitioner Male Mangal Chris Dispo­ Sec.
Pothu i
bailable Sanction released on bail, agiri tian sed 437 &
Raju ed who was addic­ 439 of
ted to alcohol Cr.P.C.
may attack his
wife and
daughter again.
Hence, even
though it is a
third bail
application, was
dismissed
371
007 1558/08 I. Lokesh 417, Cashier Non- Not No specific Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Babu 313, 506 bailable Sanction reasons u sed 437 &
ed mentioned for 439 of
dismissal Cr.P.C.

o
o
oo
PUJH

r\
1566/08 Syed Teache Non- Not As it is a serious Male Chilak Dispo­ Sec.

co co
r\
Allabaksh r bailable Sanction offence, aluripet
n
sed 437 &

o
kidnapping a

<rs
ed 439 of
student, petition

co
'tintS'O
m
CO
VO
VO
rv
Cr.P.C.
i is dismissed.
But in Crl.M.p.
1566/1/2008,
bail was granted
600 to the petitioner
1569/08 Nalam 304-B House Non- Not As the Fema Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Anjani R/W34 wife bailable Sanction prosecution Je u sed 437 &
ed witnesses may 439 of
tamper, the Cr.P.C.
third bail
application was
granted

T—(
o
OO

O'
1570/08 N. Non- Not As there is no A1 is Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.

Ov <N
Sivayya & bailable Sanction fear of male, u sed 438 of

CO ^1-
CO
<(£ . _
three ed apprehension all Cr.P.C.
others the petition are
was dismissed femal
es

372
 H
o
1578/08 Pyneni 498-A Lecture Non- Not No specific Male Narasa Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Rambabu r in SS bailable Sanction reasonsmention raopet u sed 438-A
& N. ed ed for of
Colleg dismissal Cr.P.C.
e,
Narasa
raopet
012 1587/08 Nalam 304 Non- Not As the A1 & Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Sitarama bailable Sanction investigation is A4 u sed 437 &
Murthy & ed not completed Male 439 of
3 others s, A2 Cr.P.C.
& A3
are
i
Fema
i

les
013 i
1588/08 Nalam 304-3 Non- Not The post Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Prasad R/W34 bailable Sanction mortem report u sed 437 &
ed is still awaited, 439 of
injury seems to Cr.P.C.
be fatal and
investigation is
still in progress

^r
o
•4
m
1589/08 Soma Non- Not In the present Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.

m P5
o s
Kanaka bailable Sanction case it is no u sed 438 of

^. ..
Rao ed where Cr.P.C.
1

mentioned that
the petitioner
373
 apprehends
arrest by the
Police in
connection
with this crime

r—H
in
l
l
l

o
1604/08 Bandela 498-A, Non- Sanction Male Tenali Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Subba Rao 306 bailable ed u sed 437 &
439 of

|
Cr.P.C.
016 1605/08 U. Smu 306 JPC Vegeta Non- Not As the Male Tenali Chen Dispo­ Sec.
ble bailable Sanction prosecution is chu sed 437 &
tendere ed apprehending 439 of
r that the Cr.P.C.
i

petitioner is
likely to
influence the
witnesses and
interfere with
the process of
investigation.
Hence, the i

Hon’ble court
finds that the
bail is to be
dismissed
o
r-
<5
CN

I_f
O
m
1606/08 Auto Non- Not As the Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.

S—(
• 03
xn
£
Driver bailable Sanction investigation is u sed 437 &

cS
9
i
ed not completed, 439 of
bail is not Cr.P.C.
sanctioned. In
Crl.M.P.
1606/1/2008,
also bail is not
sanctioned

o
T ■4
oo
1633/08 K. 302, 379 Non- Not No specific Male Sattena Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Musalaiah bailable Sanction grounds palli u sed 437 &
ed mentioned for 439 of
dismissal Cr.P.C.

O
T—^
ON
1644/08 Velpula 304-B Non- Not As incriminating !A1 & Guraza Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Rambabu bailable Sanction material in this A2 la u sed 437 &
& 3 others ed case was seized are 439 of
from the houe of Fema Cr.P.C.
the petitioners les,
i
and the
A3 is
invesgating
agency,
Male
apprehended
that these
petitioners
would interfere
with the process
i

\
of investigation,
hence the
 petition, is
dismissed, but
Crl.M.P
1644/1/08, the
bail is granted.

<N
VO
VO
t-
020 T. 323, Non- Not As the Fema Vinuko Hind Dispo­ Sec.

1—1 GC
Nagamalle 498-A, bailable Sanction investigation is le nda u sed 437 &
swri 506 IPC ed in progress 439 of
Cr.P.C.

l
l
l

CN
o
1666/08 A. Subba A1 is Non- Sanction Both Ponnur Hind Dispo­ Sec.

o
OO
Rao & Nowka bailable ed are u u sed 437 &
another r in males 439 of
Siva Cr.P.C.

VO
Wines

.
O ^r

^ ^ ■'cf rn r^i K
m to
vot>Oro(Nt>
oorsMmS
022 1678/08 Dudekula 307 Non- Sanction Male Chilak Dude Dispo­ Sec.
Hussain bailable ed aluripet kula sed 437 &
439 of
Cr.P.C.
023 1688/08 Polepogu 452, Non- Sanction As the i Male Narasa Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Ramulu 354, 506 bailable ed investigationis raopet u sed 437 &
R/W34 not completed 439 of
bail is not Cr.P.C.
granted. But,
in Crl.M.P.
1688/2/2008
bail is granted

376
 l
ll
024 1689/08 Karra 366 Non- Sanction Male Repalle Chris Dispo ­ Sec.
Yona bailable ed tian sed 437 &
439 of
Cr.P.C.
025 1700/08 Kumbi
CO

337, Non- N ot. Already 4 Male Guntur Hind Dispo ­

Saradhi
u ^|-

304-A bailable Sanction witnesses have u sed

6 i> os

ed been examined.
ro m O

12 witnesses
remaining to be
examined.
Hence, at this
stage the
Hon ’ble court
thinks that it is
not correct
grant bail
026 1706/08 Uppu 341, 3rd Peti­ Non- Not No specific All Vinuko Hind Dispo ­ Sec.
Srinu & 8 307, 427 tioner is bailable Sanction grounds are nda u sed 437 &
others R/W 34 student. ed mentioned males 439 of
6th peti­ other than Cr.P.C.
tioner is
investigation is
gradu­
still in
ate,
remain­ progress.
ing are
agricul­
tural
coolies
027 1724/08 Saki Srinu Sec. 5 of All are Non- Not As the All Vinuko Hind Dispo­ Sec.
& 2 others ES Act coolies bailable Sanction connetions are nda u sed 437 &
ed between the males 439 of
petitioners and
Cr.P.C.
the Maoists is
also being
investigated into
, the bail is not
sanctioned. In
Crl.M.P. i

1724/1/2008
i
bail is
sanctioned
028 1732/08

<r\
Jada Non- Not In Cl.m>p. All Chilak Hind Dispo­ Sec.

«\
Rayelu & bailable Sanction 1732/1/2008 are aluripet u sed 437 &

«s
another ed bail is males 439 of

co rn pq
M h- 't p
ro
sanctioned Cr.P.C.

i*
i
1
029 1736/08 Peddipaka 307 IPC Non- Sanction Male Guntu Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Rambabu bailable ed i u sed 437 &
i

439 of
Cr.P.C.
030 1737/08 P. Mastan 307 R/W Non- Not In Crl.MJP. Male Narasa Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Rao 34 ; bailable Sanction 1737/1/2008, raopet u sed 437 &
ed bail is not 439 of
granted.
Cr.P.C.
Therefore, both i

the bail
applications was
i also dismissed
378
o
1754/08 T. 307 RW House Non- Sanction Fema Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Govindam 34 wife bailable ed le u sed 437 &
ma 439 of
Cr.P.C.
032 1765/08 P. Siva 457, Non- Not As the Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
380,411 bailable Sanction investigation is u sed 437 & •

ed in progress 439 of
Cr.P.C.

o
'O
m
033 1773/08 A
'"H
03
Choppara Non- Sanction Fema Tanali Dispo­ Sec.
.
03

Nagamani bailable ed le
W)
sed 437 &
439 of
Cr.P.C.
034 1784/08 G. 36 Work­ Non- Not No specific Male Narasa Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Smuwas ing as bailable Sanction grounds raopet u sed 438 of
Rao Junior ed mentioned for Cr.P.C.
Assis­ dismissal
tant,
Pay &
Accoun
ts office
t

in
N.S.P.
1

035 1785/08 M. Mastan 420 Subscri Non- Sanction Male Narasa Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Reddy berin bailable ed raopet u sed 438 of
NCMR Cr.P.C.
Chit
Funds
j
Pvt.
Ltd.
379
036 1786/08 T. 498-A, Non- Not As the Male Bapatla Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Suvama 306 IPC bailable Sanction investigation is u sed 437 &
Rao ed in progress. In 439 of
Crl.M.P.
Cr.P.C.
1786/1/2008
bail is granted

t
ii
037 1790/08 Suravarap 3,4,7 of Busine Non- Sanction Male Narasa Hind Dispo­ Sec.
u Venkata ITP Act
!
ss bailable ed raopet u sed 438 of
Reddy Cr.P.C.

oo
o
o
o
oo
038 Rayapudi 392 IPC Auto Non- Not As the accused Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Gopi Driver bailable Sanction may tamper the u sed 437 &
ed witnesses bail is 439 of
not santtioned Cr.P.C.

r-“<
oo
o
oo
039 B. 304-B House Non- Not No specific Fema Maherl Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Dayamani IPC wife bailable Sanction reasons ;le a u sed 437 &
ed mentioned for 439 of
dismissal. But
1

i
Cr.P.C.
in Crl.M.P.
1810/1/08, bail
is sanctioned

o
o
1812/08 P. 307 R/W Non- Not As the investiga­ Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Venkatara 34 ' bailable Sanction tion is in u sed 437 &
mana ed progress, bail is 439 of
not sanctioned. Cr.P.C.
But the 3rdbail
application in
Crl.M.P.
) 1812/2/08 bail is
sanctioned
380
 <■
i
i

o
i—H
cs
(N
o
OO
oo
oo
o\
Katta Lecture Non- Sanction Male Baptla Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Subba Rao r in bailable ed u sed 437 &
KLC, 439 of
!

Engg. Cr.P.C.
Colleg
e, VJA.
042 1846/08 Sk. Jabeer 307 R/W Non- Not In Crl.M.P. Male Manchi Musli Dispo­ Sec.
34 :
bailable Sanction 1846/1/08, bail rala m sed 437 &
ed is granted. But 439 of
no specific Cr.P.C.
grounds 1

mentioned for
dismissal
043 1865/08 Lanka Sec.50 Non- Not As the All Sattena Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Varma & of ES bailable Sanction investigation is are palli u sed 437 &
i

2 others A ct '
ed in progress males 438 of
i
--------------------------------
Cr.P.C.

o
044 1866/08 Sk./ Non- Not As the Male Sattena Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Shajahan bailable Sanction investigation is palli u sed 437 &

U U-t H
d W -h
C/3 O <
ed still in 439 of
progress, bail Cr.P.C.
is ot sanctioned
1
l
l

m
045 1867/08 Onda Non-

<rv C/3.......... .......... a

Sanction Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Venkata bailable ed u sed 437 &
Siva 439 of

____________ ____
Manga Cr.P.C.
Raiu

381
046 1905/08 Thiyyagur 380 IPC Non- Not As there is no Male Vinuko Hind Dispo­ Sec.
a bailable Sanction fear of nda u sed 437 &
Srinivasa ed apprehension, 439 of
Reddy bail is not Cr.P.C.
granted
047 1916/08 Gollapalli 399 R/W Non- Not There is Both Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Murali & 511 bailable Sanction apprehension are u sed 437 &
another f 439 of
ed of males
abscondingthe Cr.P.C.
i
accused
i

andcommitting
of
dacomulesity if
he is eleased
on bail

l
1
t
048 1924/08 Chatla 354 & Non- Sanction Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Sarath 506 R/W bailable ed u sed 437 &
24 439 of
Cr.P.C.
049 1933/08 Y.Krupa 406,420 Non- Not No specific Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Rao bailable Sanction reasons u sed 438 of
f
ed mentioned for Cr.P.C.
dismissal
f
l
l

050 1999/08 Nadava 307, 302 Non- Sanction All Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Innaiah & R/W 34 bailable ed are u sed 437 &
4 others males 439 of
Cr.P.C.
382
051 2000/08 Kuraganti 147, Non- Not' As prosecution All Mangal Hind Dispo- Sec.

1
00
i
3
Srinu& 8 bailable Sanbtion witnesses may are agiri sed 437 &

<D
T3
others 452, be tampered by males j 439 of
307, 324 the accused Cr.P.C.
R/W 149 bail is not

&
u
granted
BAIL APPLICATIONS FILED BEFORE I-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, GUNTUR IN THE YEAR 2009
S Crimi­ Name of Nature Occu­ Bailable Bail is If bail is not Gen­ Town Caste Bail Sec.
N nal Mis- the of pation or Non- sanc­ sanctioned, der (or) appli­ under
o llaneous Accused Offence of Bailable tioned reasons, if any discri Village cation which
Petition (or) Accu­ Offence (or) Not mina- or city is bail
Number Offence sed tion of the Dispo­ appli­
charged Accu­ sed (or) cation
ZD sed Not filed
Cl
ID
C3
63
100 C4 C5 C6 C8 CIO C ll C13 C14
002/09 Shaik 498-A House Non- Not As the Fema Gutur Musli Dispo­ Sec.
Shahanaz Wife bailable Sanction investigation is le m sed 438 of
ed in progess bail Cr.P.C.
is not
sanctioned
002 003/09 Beri 498-A Securit Non- Not In the result, Male Vinuko Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Raghava y bailable Sanction this petition is nda u sed 438 of
Guard ed dismissed. Cr.P.C.
However, the
petitioners are
at liberty to
surrender
before the trial
court within
one week from
the date of the
order and seek
bail
384
o
om
011/09 Peravali 498-A Class- . Non- Not As the Male Chilak Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Pavan IV bailable Sanction investigation is aluripet u
i
sed 438 of
i Kumar employ ed in progress bail Cr.P.C.
|
ee is not
sanctioned

13
004 012/09 Naagothu 143, All are Bailable Sanction All Narasa Dispo- Sec.
Sowraiah 341, Telugu ed are raopet : sed 438 of
& 7 others 506, Desam males Cr.P.C.
R/W 149 Party
!

leaders
005 013/09 Ravella 353, Bailable Sanction Crl.MJP. 14/09, All Narasa Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Lakshmin 506, ed 15/09 is also are raopet u sed 438 of
arayana & 143, 323 same bail males Cr.P.C.
6 others applications of
the other
accused
involved in the
same offence
900 are sanctioned
023/09 Katta 302, 379 Cultiva Non- Not As the Male Sattena Hind Dispo­ Sec.43
Musalaiah tion bailable Sanction investigation is palli u sed 7&
ed in progress bail 439 of
is not Cr.P.C.
sanctioned

Q
■>
007 024/09 63 and Busine Bailable Not Hence, the Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
64 of ss Sanction petition is u sed 438 of
Copy ed dismissed. Cr.P.C.

h! > oo
a Is :§
*3 « %
Ills
Riglit However, he
385
 Act, shall surrender
1987 before the trial
court forthwith
and seek a bail

•
from the
concerned
court.

o
o
oo
038/09 Reddymos 307, 324 Farmer Non- Not As the All Vinuko Redd Dispo­ Sec.
u Siva R/W34 s bailable Sanction investigation is are nda y sed 437 &
Koteswara IPC ed in progress, males 439 of
Rao & 4 bail is not Cr.P.C.
600 others sanctioned
039/09 O ’Shaik 304 IPC Daily Non- Not In 39/1/09 bail Male Mangal Musli Dispo­ Sec.
Moulali & Sec.50 Wager bailable Sanction is sanctioned agiri m sed 437 &
of ES Earner ed 439 of
Act Cr.P.C.

O
On

O'
010 Bandla 307, 354 Non- Not As the Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Krishna IPC bailable Sanction investigation is u sed 437 &
ed in progress, 439 of
bail is not Cr.P.C.
sanctioned

o
*—i
r-H
066/09 A. 307 R/W Non- Not The petitioner Male Chilak Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Venkaiah 34 IPC bailable Sanction not mentioning aluripet u sed 437 &
ed that he has 439 of
been arrested
i
Cr.P.C.
on a particular
date so bail is
i

not sanctioned
386
 012 067/09 Bathula 379 1PC Non- Not As the All Sattena Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Durga Rao bailable Sanction investigation is are palli u sed 437 &
& 2 others ed in progress, males 439 of
bail is not Cr.P.C.

••
i

sanctioned

t—H
' i

O
o
m
VO
O
068/09 Moduguri House Non- Sanction Fema Ponnur Hind Dispo­ Sec.

fe. ■
Gowramm wife bailable ed le Mandal u sed 437 &
a 439 of
60/690 Cr.P.C.

i
014 M. Muni 366(A) Electri Non- Sanction Male Bapatla Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Swamy cian bailable ed u sed 437 &
439 of
1
_______ Cr.P.C.

l
i
l

o
<—H
IT)
084/09 . Gotta 366 & Coolie Non- Sanction Male Chilak Mala Dispo­ Sec.
Suresh 363 i bailable ed aluripet sed 437 &
i
439 of
Cr.P.C.

t—H
O
VO
©
093/09 Shak Lorry Non- Not As the Male Macher Musli Dispo­ Sec.

Su
m m
Gabeer Driver bailable Sanction investigation is la m sed 437 &
i
ed in progress, 439 of
bail is not Cr.P.C.

” -------------
L------------------ sanctioned

o
r—<
r-
094/09 K. Non- Not As the Male Mangal Hind Dispo­ Sec.

'-t h
Krishna bailable Sanction investigation is agiri u sed 437 &

n’ n
Rao ed in progress bail 439 of

ro
rv
^ O
is not \ Cr.P.C.

(N ^
2

S
sanctioned

co M h
oo M h- p U
CL
387
018 095/09 C. Sarath 354 & Non- Not In Crl.M.P. Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
506 R/W bailable Sanction 95/1/09 bail is u sed 437 &
34 IPC
!
ed sanctioned as 439 of
i

the investigation Cr.P.C.

60/960 is completed

O
fH
On
Kesaboina 307 IPC Farmer Non- In Crl.M.P. Male Krosur Yada Dispo­ Sec.

d
• r-H
+->
o
Veera bailable 96/1/09 bail is u va sed 437 &
again not

Si's
Raju 439 of
sanctioned and Cr.P.C.
inCrl.M.P.
96/2/09 bail is
sanctioned as
the investigation
is completed

i
i
l
020 097/09 P. 436 IPC Fishier Non- Sanction Male Nugen Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Lakshmai y bailable ed dla u sed 437 &
ah 439 of
Cr.P.C.

m
o

VO
VO
021 107/09 Y. Appala Fishier Non- Not As the ! Male Nagaij Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Raju y bailable Sanction petitioner was una u sed 437 &
ed already Sagar 439 of
married no Cr.P.C.
material to
show tht the
petitioner has
divorced his
. i
first wife, bail
is not
sanctioned
388
022 117/09 K. 306 IPC Pancha- Non- Not As the Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Sambasiva yat bailable Sanction investigation is u sed 437 &
i '

Rao Secre­ ed in progress bail 439 of

tary of is not Cr.P.C.
Garika-
sanctioned
padu,
i

Tadi-
konda
Mandal
023 118/09 Donditi Non- . Not As the Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Koti bailable Sanction investigation is u sed 437 &
! Reddy & ed in intial stage 439 of
: another Cr.P.C.
024 129/09 Shaik 376, Non- Not InCrl.M.P. Male Tenali Musli Dispo­ Sec.
Hussain 419, bailable Sanction 129/1/09, bail m sed 437 &
323,506 ed is sanctioned 439 of
of IPC Cr.P.C.

l
ll
025 130/09 N. 307,302 Non- Sanction Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Rayappa R/W34 bailable ed u sed 437 &
439 of
i

Cr.P.C.
i
026 139/09 Shaik 498-A /
Emplo Non- Not The petitioner is Male Tadiko Musli Dispo­ Sec.
Mahaboob yment bailable Sanction workingin Riyad nda m sed 437 &
in ed it would be j

439 of
Riyad difficult to Cr.P.C.
secure his
presence.
Hence, bail is
not sanctioned
389
 I
l
027 151/09 P. 307 R/W Non- Sanction Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Venkata 34 bailable ed u sed 437 &
Ramana & 439 of
other Cr.P.C.
028 152/09 Vallepu 420,406 Coolie Non- Not In view of Male Done Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Veeranjan IP bailable Sanction seriousness of (Md) u sed 438 of
eyulu ed the offence bail Cr.P.C.
is not
1

sanctioned
029 168/09 Shaik 354, 324 Coolie Non- Not As the Male Vennu Musli Dispo­ Sec.
Subhani R/W34 bailable Sanction investigation is konda m sed 437 &
IPC ed in progress, 439 of
bail is not Cr.P.C.
sanctioned
030 169/09 K. 147, Non- Not As it is political Male Neeruk Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Ramesh 148, bailable Sanction rivalry accused onduru u sed 438 of
452, ed can spoil Cr.P.C.
307, 324 prosecution
R/W 149 case, bail is not
IPC sanctioned
031 187/09 V. 365 & Non- Not As the Both Mangal Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Venkata 397 bailable Sanction investigation is are agiri u sed 437 &
Krishna ed in progress bail male 439 of
Raju & is not Cr.P.C.
other sanctioned
032 190/9 ; K. 354,506 Non- Not In Crl.M.P. Male Nuzen Hind Dispo­ Sec. 437
Danaiah R/W 34 bailable Sanction 190/1/09 bail is dla & 439
i
u sed
ed granted (Md) ofCrPC
39a
 l
i
i
033 192/09 Annapure Non- Sanction Male Macha Hind Dispo­ Sec.
ddy bailable ed varam u sed 438 of
(Md) Cr.P.C.

t
i
i
034 196/09 Daggupati 366 IPC Non- Sanction Fema Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Venkata bailable ed le u sed 438 of
Sarada Cr.P.C,

l
l
l

o
ON
ON
i>
035 Shaik 307 Non- Sanction Male Amara Dude Dispo­ Sec.
Saidu bailable ed vathi kula sed 437 &
439 of
Cr.P.C.
036 198/09 Maddu 307, Student Non- Not As the investiga­ Male Sattena Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Dileep 498-A bailable Sanction tion is in palli u sed 437 &
506 IPC ed progress, bail is 439 of
I
not sanctioned Cr.P.C.

i
l
i
037 204/09 Maddy 307, Staff Non- Sanction Fema Sattena Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Anil 498-A, Nurse bailable ed le palli u sed 437 &
Kumari 506 IP in 439 of
commu
Cr.P.C.
-nity
Health
Cente,
Sartena-
PalH
i
i
i

038 218/09 Koppula Agricul Non- Sanction All Tharlu Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Alluri tural bailable ed are padu, u sed 437 &
Venkata

O S <H
csr^fe

m Pi o
O
work males Prakas 439 of
Subba
amDt. Cr.P.C.
Reddy & 3
others
391
 039 219/09 Inturi 304-B Non- Not But, bail is All Challa Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Param R/W34 bailable Sanction sanctioned in are palli u sed 437 &
Jyothi & 2 ed CrLM.P. males (Md), 439 of
others 219/1/09. In Krishn Cr.P.C.
this petition as
aDt.
the investigatin
is in progress
bail is not
granted
040 229/09 Mudraboi 307 Agricul Non- Not As the release of Male Ganna Hind Dispo­ Sec.
na Naga tural bailable Sanction the petitioner varam u sed 437 &
Raju coolie ed may interfere (M), 439 of
with the trial. Krishn Cr.P.C.
i
The Hon’ble aDt.
Court gave the
decision to the
i

lower ourt
where the trial is
being
1
____________ commenced

r-H

o
CN
CN
SO
o
Os
Podli 354, Student Non- Not In 262/1/09, the Male Guntur Musli Dispo­ Sec.
Shaik 307, 506 in bailable Sanction petitioner m sed 437 &
Mahaboob IPC Para- ed granted bail. If 439 of
Basha medica die accused is
Cr.P.C.
1
released at this
profess stage, it is
livelihood of
ional
attacking the girl
course whom he loved.

392
042 228/09 G. 498-A Kalasi / Non- Sanction With a A1 Guntur Hind Dispo ­ Sec.
Jaganmoh Helper bailable ed condition to and u sed 43.8 of
an Bhadur in the co-operate in A2 Cr.P.C.
& 2 others office the are
of Sr. investigation Males
Section , A3
Engi­ is Fe­
neer male
043 235/09 D. 498-A, Retired Non- Sanction Male Pidigur Hind Dispo ­ Sec.
Srinivasa 302 R/W RTC bailable ed alia u sed 437 &
Reddy 34 Ernplo 439 of
yee Cr.P.C.
044 236/09 Vemula 354 Lorry Non- Not Though, the Male Ponnur Hind Dispo ­ Sec.
Anthoni Driver bailable Sanction investigation u sed 437 &
ed completed, as 439 of
the petitioner is Cr.P.C.
involved in
heirous and
serious crime.
The petition is
dismissed. But
this petition bail
in 3rd application
Crl.M.P. 236 / 2
/09, where
Crl.M.P.236/1/
09 which is 2nd
application is
also rejected
393
045 247/09 Shaik 498-A Non- Sanction As the Male Guntur Musli Dispo­ Sec.
Lathif bailable ed petitioner may m sed 438 of
obscond and Cr.P.C.
disturb the
daughter-in-
law who is Al,
i

crucial for the

case, the bail is
not sanctioned
046 251/09 Tammisett 307 R/W Non- Sanction Male Chilak Hind Dispo­ Sec.
y 34 bailable ed aluripet u sed 437 &
Sambaiah 439 of
Cr.P.C.

I
047 269/09 Velpula 304-B Non- Sanction A2& Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Mariyam bailable ed A5 u sed 437 &
ma & 2 are 439 of
t

1
others Male Cr.P.C.
s, A4
is
Fema
le

o
oo
271/09 Bommare 498-A Non- Sanction As the A2& Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
ddy bailable ed investigation A4 u sed 438 of
Samrajya completed on a are Cr.P.C.
m&2 condition to Males
others appear before , A3
the trial court is Fe­
male
394
049 284/09 Vampugal 376 R/W Cultiva Non- Not The petitioners Mle Tenali Hind Dispo­ Sec.
la Samson 511 & tion bailable Sanction bail application u sed 437 &
306 IPC ed was dismissed. 439 of
In Crl.M.P. Cr.P.C.
284/1/09 also it
was dismissed
I

as the i

investigation is
in progress 3rd
bail application
in Crl.M.p.
284/2/09 was
granted

l
050 293/09 D. Subba 376(2) Non- Sanction Male Tenali Mala Dispo­ Sec.
Rao R/W 511 bailable ed sed 437 &
439 of
Cr.P.C.

i—i

o
m
302/09 GelliKoti 147, Suppor Non- Sanction Bail is allowed All Dispo­ Sec.
Reddy 148, ters of bailable ed to A49 is are sed 438 of
(A49) 307, 302 Telugu already are the males Cr.P.C.
R/W 149 Desam accused from
Party A1 to A48 are
in bail
052 303/09 D. Chinna 307 PG Non- Not Bail is not Male Bapatla Mala Dispo­ Sec.
student bailable Sanction sanctioned as sed 437 &
ed the 439 of
investigation is Cr.P.C.
not in progress
395
053 320/09 Shaik 303, Non- Sanction Bail is not Male Tenali Musli Dispo­ Sec.
Nagur 506,354 bailable ed sanctioned as m sed 437 &
Vali the petitioner 439 of
involved in Cr.P.C.
heinous
offence

o
IT)
324/09 Uppu 341,307 Non- Sanction All Vinuko Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Srinu & 9 R/W34 bailable ed are nda u sed 437 &
others males 439 of
Vinu Cr.P.C.
kond
a
055 327/09 Mutyala 498-A Non- Not As there is no Male Nandy Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Narayana bailable Sanction reasonable ala u sed 438 of
Rao ed apprehension Cr.P.C.
of arrest,
petition is
dismissed
056 334/09 Sk. Shabir 307 R/W Non- Not There is Male Guntur Musli Dispo­ Sec.
34IPC bailable Sanction apprehension for m sed 437 &
ed the victim in the 439 of
hands of the Cr.P.C.
petitioner who is
no other than his
wife. But, in
Crl.MJP.
334/2/09 bail is
sanctioned
 l
l
057 547/09 Kola 304-B Non- Sanction A1 Vinuko Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Venkaiah R/W34 bailable ed & A3 nda u sed 437 &
& 2 others are 439 of
Male Cr.P.C.
s and
A2 is
Fema
le

1
l
l
058 548/09 Karumanc 307 IPC Non- Sanction Male Tenali Hind Dispo­ Sec.
hi Seshu bailable ed 11 sed 437 &
Babu 439 of
Cr.P.C.
059 557/09 K. 452,324 Non- Not Bail is not Fema Isukap Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Samrajya IPC bailable Sanction sanctioned les alii, u sed 438 of
m& ed because mere Repalle Cr.P.C.
another apprenension of town
the petitioners
that they would i

i
be arrested by
j

the Police in
connection with
1
the crime would
090 not sufficient
l

558/09 Merugu 307 R/W Non- Sanction Male Guntur Gow Dispo­ Sec.
Srinu & 34 IPC bailable ed s da sed 437 &
another 439 of
i

1
Cr.P.C.
 O
12
061 567/09 N. Rama 354, Non- Not No specific Male Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Rao 448,509 bailable Sanction reasons u sed 437 &
IPC ed mentioned in 439 of
the bail Cr.P.C.
application for
dismissal
062 568/09 B.V. 448, Follow Non- Not Bail is not Male Vattich Hind Sec.
j
Dispo­
Nagabhus 323, 306 er of bailable Sanction sanctioned erukur u sed 437 &
hanam IPC Congre ed because u (Md) 439 of
ss theinvestigatio Cr.P.C.
Party n is in progress
and the offence
i
o
i
alleged against
i
|

the petitioner is
one of serious
nature, a
valuable humar
life has been
last.
063 582/09 Sk. 427, Non- Not The petitioner Male Sattena Musli Dispo­ Sec.
Haneef 354, 306 bailable Sanction has been palli m sed 437 &
IPC ed repeatedly 439 of
assaulting the Cr.P.C.
said Shaik i

Nuijaha,
though the
inestigationis
398
 completed the
bail is not
sanctioned.
But in Crl.M.P.
582/2/2009,
•

bail is
sanctioned
064 599/09 K. 457 & Non- Not As the Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
l

Sriramulu 380 pf bailable Sanction investigation is u sed 437 &

ip c ; ed in progress 439 of
Cr.P.C.
065 353/09 Balasami 399 of Coolie Non- Not As the Male Tadepa Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Venkates IPCi& bailable Sanction investigation is lli u sed 437 &
.
wara Rao 25 of ed not completed 439 of
Arms i
Cr.P.C.
1 990 Act

»n tJ-
354/09 Sk. Non- Not Such type of Male Guntur Musli Dispo­ Sec.

m m
o
'■O
O
!
Mastan bailable Sanction instances m sed 437 &

___
ed against women 439 of
of late have Cr.P.C.
been in the
raise and
causing much
hardship to the
society.
Hence, bail is

__________________
not sanctioned
067 363/09 Name 420 IPC Busine Non- Not There is no Male Nallap Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Sambasiva ss bailable Sanction reasonable adu u sed 438 of
Rao ed apprehension Cr.P.C.
of arrest.
Hence, petition
i

is dismissed
068 401/09 Amar 406 IPC Non- Not As Male Mahara Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Singh bailable Sanction investigation shtra u sed 437 &
Sanga ed sofar disclosed State 439 of
that the Cr.P.C.
petitioner
prima-facie
i

appers to have
misappropriate
d the cotton
seeds, hence
bail is not
690 sanctioned

o
oo
O
Os
Sk. Baba 307, 384 1
Non- Not As the Male Narasa Musli Dispo­ Sec.
& an other R/W 34 . bailable Sanction investigation is raopet m sed 437 &
IPC ed at theinitial 439 of
stage Cr.P.C.
070 409/09 P. Kotaiah 436 OF Coolie Non- Not As the Male Tenali Madi Dispo­ Sec.
ip bailable Sanction investigation is (Md) ga sed 437 &
ed inprogress 439 of
Cr.P.C.
o
rH
cm
xj*
ON
Sk. 376 R/W Non- Not The offence Male Narasa Musli Dispo­ Sec.
Kareemull 511; bailable Sanction committed by raopet m sed 437 &
a ed the petitioner is 439 of
one of Cr.P.C.
theserious
nature. Hence,
i

though the
investigation is
completed bail
is not
granted,but in
CrLM.P.
427/1/09, bail is
granted
:
072 429/09 Syed Meer 409, Vetem Non- Not The District Male Bapatla Musli Dispo­ Sec.
Hussain 268,420 ary bailable Sanction Court handed m sed 438 of
j
Officer ed over thematter Cr.P.C.
to thetrialcourt
for disposal of
bail
073 433/09 Nadava 307, 302 Non- Sanction Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Jakraiah R/W 34 bailable ed u sed 437 &
IPC 439 of
Cr.P.C.
!i

074 448/09 Peripogu 307 Non- Sanction Male Sattena Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Sagar bailable ed palli u sed 437 &
439 of
CrPC
075 456/09 Y. 376 R/W Non- Not As the Male Chilak Kams Dispo­ Sec.
Brahmaia 511 bailable Sanction investigationis aluripet ali sed 437 &
h ed not completed 439 of
Cr.P.C.
076 461/09 Tadiboina 307 R/W Non- Not Some of the Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Ankamma 34EPC bailable Sanction witnesses are yet s u sed 437 &
Rao & ed tobe examined. 439 of
another Hence, the bail Cr.P.C.
is not sanctioned
|
077 462/09 Sk. Abdul 306 IPC Non- Sanction Male Martur Musli Dispo­ Sec.
Rehman bailable ed m sed 437 &
!

439 of
l

i
Cr.P.C.

oo
t^~
o.
473/09 Kodela 143, Ex. Non- Sanction Since all the Male Narasa Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Siva 341, 506 Ministe bailable ed other acused in raopet u sed 438 of
Prasad R/W 149 r the crime have Cr.P.C.
already been
ordered to be
released on bail
and surrender
before the trial
court,the
Hon’ble Court
feels that it
could meet the
ends ofjustice if
the petitioner is
also released
 i
079 475/09 Sk. 306 of House Non- Sanction Fema Sattena Musli Dispo­ Sec.
Saidabee IPC wife bailable ed le palli m sed 437 &
439 of
Cr.P.C.

O
oo
o
476/09 Gummadi 420 P C Proprie Non- Not As the Male Vinuko Hind Dispo­ Sec.
i

Sadasiva tor of bailable Sanction petitioner nda u sed 438 of

Rao Sri ed called absent in Cr.P.C.
Vijaya the open court
Durga on hearing
Seeds date, bail is not
granted

E'­

H
OO
o
r-
Os
en
VO
R. Ravi Student Non- Not As the Male Tadepa Hind Dispo­
w 't

bailable Sanction petitioner has m, u sed

6 o os

ed committed a Guntur
U
<u m m m
M 'o ^

rape on a
i

minor girl, the

offence
becomes
serious in
nature. Hence,
the petition is
dismissed
|

082 484/09 Ramineni 307 Non- Sanction Male Macher Kam Dispo­ Sec.
Naxal bailable ed la ma sed 437 &
Kumar 439 of
Cr.P.C.
 ;

O
oo
m
485/09 M. Gangi 506 & Non- Not As the All Tsundu Redd Dispo­ Sec.
Reddy & 509 bailable Sanction investigationis are ra y sed 437 &
2 others ed in progress, bail males (Md) 439 of
is not granted. Cr.P.C.
But in Crl.M.P.
485/2/09 bail is
sanctioned
j
084 496/09 Ch. 366, Non- Not No specific Male Guntur Musli Dispo­ Sec.
Ansary 366-A bailable Sanction reasons m sed 437 &
ed mentioned for 439 of
dismissal. But, Cr.P.C.
in Crl.M.P.
496/2/09, bail is
sanctioned
085 497/09 Thuraka 498-A, Non- Not The petitioner Male Gurajal Vadd Dispo­ Sec.
Srinivas 307 R/W bailable Sanction harassing his a era sed 437 &
Rao 34 of ed wife, if he 439 of
EPC released on bail Cr.P.C.
the same
problem repeats.
Hence, the bail
is not sanctioned

o
OO
VO
512/09 M. Raju 436,427 Painter Non- Not In Crl.M.P. Male Kateva Hind Dispo­ Sec.
bailable Sanction 512/1/09 bail is ra u sed 437 &
ed granted (village 439 of
i ______ Cr.P.C.
 o
087 513/09 Chimata Suppor Non- Not If petitioners All Sattena Yada Dispo­ Sec.

O "3*
co co
Thirapath ters of bailable Sanction are now are palli va sed 437 &
aiah& 5 TDP ed released on the males 439 of
others bail in time of Cr.P.C.
elections, there
is every chance
of both the
!

groups coming
J
to a clash,
hence the
J

petition is
i
--------- dismissed

o
oo
oo
524/09 Battula 306 R/W Non- Not S the All Manchi Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Venkata 34 bailable Sanction investigation is are rala u sed 437 &
Swamy & ed in progress males 439 of
1
!

2 others Cr.P.C.

•
089 528/09 M.
^

Non- Not As the Both Tenali Dispo­ Sec.

co co
Laxshman
a
c3 eg

bailable Sanction petitioner is are sed 437 &

r»
udu & ed rowdy sheeter males 439 of

^
r»
another the bail is not Cr.P.C.

W
(nS
r~~ ^ oo o e>
co ro
<N ^
granted. But,
Crl.M.P.
528/1/2009
bail is granted
 l
i
090 529/09 D. Non- Sanction Male Tanali Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Chakravar bailable ed u sed 437 &

o in ^
mm^
thi 439 of

<N
C— 'vt" OO t'-
r.
Cr.P.C.

S
—i.

P5 o
fo u
091 537/09 Sk. Saida 307,384 Student Non- Not The petitioners All Narasa Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Vali and 3 R/W34 s bailable Sanction approached the are raopet u sed 437 &
others ed court by mere males 439 of
1
fear. Hence, Cr.P.C.
the petition is
dismissed.
092 546/09 Kommuri Sec.5 of Bailable Not As the All Narasa Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Srinu & 4 ES Act Sanction investigation is are raopet u sed 437 &
others ed in progress. In males 439 of
Crl.M.P. Cr.P.C.
546/1/09 bail is
granted
093 614/09 Sk. 498-A Softwa Non- Not As there seems Male Hydera Musli Dispo­ Sec.
j
Roshan re bailable Sanction to be more fear bad m sed 438 of
Jameer Engine ed of Cr.P.C.
er in apprehension
Hydera bail is not
bad granted
 1
l
094 615/09 Thota 304-B Non- Sanction A1& Chilak Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Ajay R/W34 bailable ed A3 aluripet u sed 437 &
Kumar & are 439 of
3 others males Cr.P.C.
,A2
and
A4
i

are
fe­
males
095 620/09 Suragani 354 IP Auto Non- Not For the safety of Male Tenali Dude Dispo­ Sec.
Mastan Driver bailable Sanction the victims who kula sed 437 &
i

ed is the mother of 439 of

j the girl allegedly Cr.P.C.
the petitioner
has fallen in
love with and
thegirl herself,
bail is not
sanctioned
I
l
096 624/09 Nadava 307, 302 First Non- Sanction I
Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Innibadu R/W34 Petitio bailable ed & 2nd u sed 437 &
& 4 others ner is petiti 439 of
student oner Cr.P.C.
is fe-
i

male

407
097 663/09 Yanala 302 Non- Not No specific Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Manikanta bailable sanction grounds u sed 437 &
Reddy ed mentioned for 439 of
dismissal of Cr.P.C.
bail applica ­
tion. InCrl.
|
M.P.663/1/09
also the
petition was
dismissed,
which is
second bail
j

application
098 Dutta 307 House Non- Sanction Fema Tenali Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Maryya wife bailable ed le u sed 437 &
mma 439 of
Cr.P.C.

l
Il
099 665/09 Madera 306 Auto Non- Sanction Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Nageswar Driver bailable ed u sed 437 &
aRao 439 of
Cr.P.C.

r—i
o
o
671/09 Chinam 307 R/W Suppor Non- Sanction As the All Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Powl&lO 34 ters of bailable ed investigation is are u sed 437 &
others Praja completed males 439 of
Rajya Cr.P.C.
m
Party
408
 o
679/09 Davula Sec.27
C/5
Non- Not As the Male Guntur Hind Dispo­
Chinu of Arms bailable sanction petitioner is u sed
Ayaeavu Act
(U fO fO
^ O

ed already an
^ O
6 t> o\ ^

accused in a
murder case. If
released of bail
he will creat a
law and order
problem.
Hene, petition
is dismissed

l
l
l
102 682/09 K.V. 498-A, Asst. Non- Sanction Male Hydera Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Rama 324 R/W Profess bailable ed bad u sed 438 of
Satya 34 or in Cr.P.C.
j
Kumar Dept,
of
MBA,
Hydera
bad

l
l

r <
o
683/09 Kirthi 376-A, Non- Sanction Male Ponnur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Venkata 420 bailable ed u sed 437 &
Durga Rao 439 of
Cr.P.C.

1
I
l
l

^r
0
|

t
684/09 V. 498-A, Non- Sanction Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Venkates 306Rick bailable ed u sed 437 &
warlu shaw 439 of
Pullar Cr.P.C.
105 698/09 Chavala 376 Non- Not As the Male Guntur Hind Dispo­ Sec.
Subraman bailable sanction investigation is u sed 437 &
yam ed still in 439 of
progress, the Cr.P.C.
petitioner has
committed a
serious offence
the petition is
dismissed the
acused made
again 3 bail
applications for
release, but all
the three were
dismissed

All the above six tables are the data collected from the Guntur District and Sessions Court, Guntur.

410
 The Empirical study proposed in this research investigation is

undertaken by confining the data source from Principal District Court of

Guntur District and the I Additional District Court out of the eleven

Additional District courts of the Guntur District. Thus the sampling

frame restricted to two out of the eleven data sources, basing on about

20% of the available sources. This is purely a deterministric choice

focusing the District Headquarters.

The two courts choosen for data source are completely

innumerated for the latest three years namely, 2007, 2008 and 2009. All

the Bail applications for each of these three years from the two choosen

courts are thoroughly studied and the data collected are tabulated in a 13

column tables as follows:

1) Serial Number.

2) Criminal Misllaneous petition Number.

\ 3) Name of the accused.

4) Nature of offence (or) offence changed.

5) Occupation of accused.

6) Bailable or Non-bailable offence.

7) Bail is sanctioned or not.

8) If Bail is not sanctioned reasons, if any.

9) Gender discrimination.

411
 10) Town (or) Village (or) City of the accused.

11) Caste.

12) Bail application is disposed or not.

13) Section under which bail application filed.

Among the above is, quantative Analysis using descriptive as well

as inferential statistics is made with respect to the following aspects.

They are:

1. Nature of offence.

2. Bailable or Non-bailable offence.

3. Bail is sanctioned or not.

4. If Bail is not sanctioned reasons, if any.

5. Gender discrimination.

6. Town (or) Village (or) City of the accused.

7. Caste.

8. Section under which bail application filed.

Of the remaining aspeets that are left-out among 13 are the three

namely Serial number, Criminal Miscellaneous petitin number, Name of

the accused, are considered as the supplementary information for the

study.

412
 Apart from the above three occupation of the accused is also taken

as a supplementary information, which is hetrogenous in nature and

cannot be categorized may independently labeled for accused.

We got information from the various courts for our study period as

per the following distribution of bail applicants:

Court/Year 2007 2008 2009

Principal District Court 84 60 94
I Additional District Court 55 51 105

In order to supplement the Hypothetical conclusions arrived in the

earlier chapters the impirical evidences observed in our data are

processed with the help of some descriptive and inferential quantitative

techniques as listed below. For our easy comprehension the serially

numbered aspects Cl to C13 are exhausted individually, suitable -

meaningful, parawise and then an appropriate statistical technique is

adopted for analysis. The following are the details:

413
 PRINCIPAL DISTRICT COURT - 2007

S.No. Aspect Quantitative technique applied

01 Nature of offence (Column 4) Frequency count (Descriptive)

02 Bailable or Non-bailable Test for proportion

offence (C6)

03 Bail sanctioned or not (C7) Test for proportion

(i) For (C7, CIO) Chi-square test

04 If bail is not sanctioned Grouping of reasons for non­

reasons if any (C8) sanctioning of bail associated

with the subject of the sections

05 Gender Discrimination (C9) Test for proportion

06 Town (or) Village (or) City of Test for proportion

the accused (CIO)

(i) For (CIO, Cl) Chi-square test

07 Caste (Cll) Test for proportion

08 Section under which bail Test for proportion

application is filed

414
 PRINCIPAL DISTRICT COURT - 2008

S.No. Aspect Quantitative technique applied

01 Nature of offence (Column 4). Frequency count (Descriptive)
02 Bailable or Non-bailable Test for proportion
offence (C6)
03 Bail sanctioned or not (C7) Test for proportion
(i) For (C7, CIO) and (ii) {Cl, Chi-square test
Cll)
04 If bail is not sanctioned Grouping of reasons for non­
reasons if any (C8) sanctioning of bail is pansably
associated with the subject of
the sections
05 Gender Discrimination (C9) Test for proportion
(i) For (C9, Cll) and (ii) (C9, Chi-square test
CIO)
06 Town (or) Village (or) City of Test for proportion
the accused (CIO)
(i) For (CIO, C7), (ii) (CIO, Chi-square test
C9) and (iii) (CIO, Cll)
07 Caste (Cll) Test for proportion
For (i) (Cll, Cl), (ii) (Cll, Chi-square test
C9), (iii) (Cll, CIO)
08 Section under which bail Test for proportion
application is filed

415
 PRINCIPAL DISTRICT COURT - 2009

S.No. Aspect Quantitative technique applied

01 Nature of offence (Column 4) Frequency count (Descriptive)
02 Bailable or Non-bailable Test for proportion
offence (C6)
03 Bail sanctioned or not (C7) Test for proportion
For (i) (C7, C9), (ii) {Cl, CIO) Chi-square test
and (iii) (C7, Cl3)
04 If bail is not sanctioned Grouping of reasons for non­
reasons if any (C8) sanctioning of bail is pansably
associated with the subject of
the sections
05 Gender Discrimination (C9) Test for proportion
For (i) (C9, Cl) and (ii) (C9, Chi-square test
CIO)
06 Town (or) Village (or) City of Test for proportion
the accused (CIO)
(i) For (CIO, C9) (ii) (CIO, Chi-square test
Cll)
07 Caste (Cl 1) Test for proportion
For (i) (Cll, CIO) Chi-square test
08 Section under which bail Test for proportion
application is filed (Cl3)
For (i) (Cl3, C7) Chi-square test

416
 I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT - 2007

S.No. Aspect Quantitative technique applied

01 Nature of offence (Column 4) Frequency count (Descriptive)
02 Bailable or Non-bailable Test for proportion
offence (C6)
03 Bail sanctioned or not (C7) Test for proportion
For (i) (C7, C9) and (ii) (C7, Chi-square test
C13)
04 If bail is sanctioned reasons if Grouping of reasons for non­
any (C8) sanctioning of bail pansably
associated with the subject of
the sections
05 Gender Discrimination (C9) Test for proportion
For (i) (C9, Cl 3) Chi-square test
06 Town (or) Village (or) City of Test for proportion
the accused (CIO)
(i) For (CIO, C7) and (ii) (CIO, Chi-square test
Cl 3)
07 Caste (Cl 1) Test for proportion
08 Section under which bail Test for proportion
application is filed (Cl3)
For (i) (CIO, Cll), (ii) (C13, Chi-square test
C9) and (iii) (C13, CIO)

417
 I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT - 2008

S.No. Aspect Quantitative technique applied

01 Nature of offence (Column 4) Frequency count (Descriptive)
02 Bailable or Non-bailable Test for proportion
offence (C6)
03 Bail sanctioned or not (C7) Test for proportion
For (i) (C7, C9),(ii) (C7, Cll) Chi-square test
and (iii) (C7, C13)
04 If bail is not sanctioned Grouping of reasons for non­
reasons if any (C8) sanctioning of bail pansably
associated with the subject of
the sections
05 Gender Discrimination (C9) Test for proportion
For (i) (C9, CIO) and (ii) (C9, Chi-square test
C13)
06 Town (or) Village (or) City of Test for proportion
the accused (CIO)
(i) For (CIO, C7) and (ii) (CIO, Chi-square test
C9)
07 Caste (Cll) Test for proportion
08 Section under which bail Test for proportion
application is filed
For (i) (C13, Cl) and (ii) (C13, Chi-square test
C9)

418
 I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT - 2009

S.No. Aspect Quantitative technique applied

01 Nature of offence (Column 4) Frequency count (Descriptive)
02 Bailable or Non-bailable Test for proportion
offence (C6)
03 Bail sanctioned or not (C7) Test for proportion
For (i) (C7, C9), (ii) (C7, CIO) Chi-square test
and (iii) (C7, C13)
04 If bail is not sanctioned Grouping of reasons for non­
reasons if any (C8) sanctioning of bail pansably
associated with the subject of
the sections
05 Gender Discrimination (C9) Test for proportion
For (i) (C9, CIO) and (ii) (C9, Chi-square test
C13)
06 Town (or) Village (or) City of Test for proportion
the accused (CIO)
(i) For (CIO, C7), (ii) (CIO, Chi-square test
C9) and (Iii) (C10,C13)
07 Caste (Cl 1) Test for proportion
08 Section under which bail Test for proportion
application is filed
For (i) (Cl3, C7), (ii) (Cl3, Chi-square test
C9) and (Iii) (C13, CIO)

419
 In statistical science a descriptive technique is one that just

describes as it is in a tabular form or diagram or graph. It conveys what

the data is and nothing beyond. On the other hand an inferential

technique is one that helps in drawing some conclusion with a desirable

confidence from the data taking into consideration the random

fluctuations supposed to influence data variations. In the presnt situation

we have used formation of frequency counts as a descriptive tool, chi-

square test and proportionality tests as inferential tools. Frequency count

is a tabular form depicting the distribution of sample units (Bail

applicants) in various categories into which they can be divided. A chi-

square test is a tool that would be helpful to say whether two distinct

attributes or characteristics of an applicant are influencing each other to

get or not to get a bail.

Proportionality test is a tool that helps in knowing whether the

sanction of bail for applicants is evenly distributed or not with respect to

specific characteristics of the applicants. For example among applicants -

of non-bailable offence the proportion of those who are sanctioned bail

and those who are not sanctioned bail may be even or uneven. The extent

of unevenness is assessed by proportionality test.

420
 PRINCIPAL DISTRICT COURT, GUNTUR - 2007

c/5
o
£
•
Combination of aspects Statistical / Technique Calculated Tabulated Inference / Conclusion
I
quantitative used value value

< f

o
C6: Non-bailable 1
Proportionality test - 3.434 1.96 Seen to be sanctioned rather than
C7: Bail sanctioned/not denied for non bailable offences
02 C6: Non-bailable Proportionality test -1.942 1.96 Gender has no influence in the
C9: Gender discrimination nature of offence
03 C6: Non-bailable Proportionality test - 6.670 1.96 Place of residence of accused
!
CIO: Town (or) Village (or) whether he is residing in town (or)
City of the Accused city is taken into consideration
while granting bails under non-
bailable offences.
04 C6: Non-bailable ; Proportionality test 0.739 1.96 Caste has no impact in sanctioning
i
Cl 1: Caste bails for non-bailable offences.
05 C6: Non-bailable Proportionality test - 1.942 i 1.96 Section under which bail application
C l 3: Sec. under which bail filed plays a significant role while
j

application filed granting bails under non-bailable

i
90 offences.
C7: Bail sanctioned/not j Proportionality test -1.014 1.96 Gender has no influence in
C9: Gender discrimination] sanctioning bails.

o
C7: Bail sanctioned/not ! Chiq-square test 2.379 3.84 Whether the accused belongs to
CIO: Town (or) Village (or) town (or) village (or) city has no
City of the Accused influence while sanctioning bails.

o
oo
©
oo

C7: Bail sanctioned/not Proportionality test 1.96 Factor of caste has no influence in
Cl 1: Caste sanctioning bails.

421
09 C7; Bail sanctioned/not Proportionality test - 2.026 1.96 While sanctioning bails, section
C l 3: Section under which bail under which bail application filed is
application filed having significant consideration.

o
C9: Gender discrimination Proportionality test -1.942 1.96 Factor of gender discrimination has
C6: Non-bailable no influence in sanctioning bails for
non-bailable offences.

i—H
C9: Gender discrimination Proportionality test - 3.089 1.96 While granting bails to males and
C4: Nature offence/offence females the nature of offence
charged charged upon those accused, how
serious it is, taken into
consideration.

<N
961
!
C9: Gender discrimination Proportionality test -1.014 Factor of gender discrimination has
C7: Bail sanctioned/not t no influence in sanctioning bails for
i

non-bailable offences.

r-H
cn
|
C9: Gender discrimination Proportionality test -1.656 1.96 While granting bails to males and
CIO: Town (or) Village (or) females, their residence whether the
City of the Accused accused belong to town (or) village
(or) city doesn’t matter.
C9: Gender discrimination Proportionality test 0.803 1.96 While granting bails to males and
Cl 1: Caste females their caste factor was not
taken into consideration.

rH
C9: Gender discrimination Proportionality test -1.918 1.96 While granting bails to males and
C13: section under which bail females, section under which bail
application filed applications filed is not prominent
consideration.
 VO
CIO: Town (or) Village (or) Proportionality test - 6.670 1.96 While granting bails under non-
i

City of the Accused bailable offences whether the

C6: Non-bailable accused belongs to the town (or)
village (or) city was taken into
consideration and more bails are
granted in such a manner.

r—H
t-
961
CIO: Town (or) Village (or) Proportionality test - 3.582 More bails are granted as per the
City of the Accused nature of the offence charged upon
C4: Nature of offence/offence the accused. The accused if at all
charged belongs to the town (or) village (or)
city.

r-H
OO
CIO: Town (or) Village (or) Chiq-square test 2.379 3.84 While sanctioning bails town (or)
City of the Accused village (or) city of the accused are
Cl: Bail sanctioned/not .
taken into consideration.

ON
r—H
CIO: Town (or) Village (or) Proportionality test -1.656 1.96 Gender discrimination is not seen in
City of the Accused sanctioning bails to the accused
C9: Gender discrimination though they are from the city (or)
town (or) village.
20 CIO: Town (or) Village (or) Proportionality test 0.4375 1.96 While granting bails to accused
City of the Accused whether they belongs to town (or)
Cl 1: Caste village (or) city the factor of caste is
i
-------- not taken into consideration.

<N
i—(
CIO: Town (or) Village (or) Proportionality test - 3.873 1.96 More bails are granted as per the
City of the Accused sections under which such
C l 3: Section under which bail applications are filed. Though they
application filed belong to town (or) village (or) the
city.
423
22 C ll:Caste Proportionality test -1.656 1.96 While going through the nature of
C4: Nature of the offence charged upon the accused
offence/offence charged caste is not at all a factor for
consideration.
23 C ll:Caste Proportionality test 0.739 1.96 While granting bails under non-
C6: Non-bailable bailable offence the factor of caste
of the accused has no influence.
24 C ll:Caste Proportionality test 0.48 1.96 While sanctioning bails to the
C7: Bail is sanctioned/not accused the factor of caste is not
taken into consideration.
25 C ll:Caste Proportionality test 0.803 1.96 Caste is a factor where it has no
C9: Gender discrimination influence in granting bails as per the
gender discrimination.
26 C ll:Caste Proportionality test 0.4375 1.96 ; Caste is a factor where it has no
CIO: Town (or) Village (or) influence upon the granting of bails
City of the Accused to the accused whether they belong
|

to the town (or) village (or) city.

27 C ll:Caste Proportionality test 0.739 1.96 Caste is a factor where it has no
C13: Section under which bail influence upon the granting of bails
application filed as per the section under which bail
application is filed.
28 C6: Non-bailable Proportionality test -1.942 1.96 For granting bails under non-
C13: Section under which bail bailable offences, sections under
application filed which bail applications are filed are
not taken into consideration.

424
29 C l 3:Section under which bail Proportionality test - 2.026 1.96 Bails are sanctioned as per the
application filed section under which such bail
l

Cl: Bail sanctioned/not applications are filed.

30 C13: Section under which bail Proportionality test -1.918 1.96 Gender discrimination is not taken
application filed into consideration while granting
C9: Gender discrimination bails as per the section under which
bail application is granted.

m
C13: Section under which bail Proportionality test 1-3.873 1.96 Section under which bail application
application filed filed has influence on the accused
CIO: Town (or) Village (or) whether he belongs to town (or)
City of the Accused village (or) city of the accused.
32 C l 3: Section under which bail Proportionality test -0.48 1.96 Caste has no influence upon the
application filed section under which bail application
Cl 1: Caste is filed.
1
33 C4: Nature of offence/offence Proportionality test - 2.212 1.96 Section under which bail application
charged ;
filed has influence on the nature of
i

C13: Section under which bail offence charged.

application filed
 PRINCIPAL DISTRICT COURT, GUNTUR - 2008

£
o
CZ2
•
Combination of aspects Statistical / Technique Calculated Tabulated Inference / Conclusion
quantitative used value value

f—*
o
C6: Non-bailable offence Test for proportion - 2.659 1.96 Bails seen to be sanctioned rather
C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not than denied for non-bailable
offences.
02 C6: Non-bailable offence Test for proportion -0.1497 1.96 Gender has no influence in the
1

!
C9: Gender discrimination nature of offence
03 C6: Non-bailable offence Test for proportion 0.519 1.96 Place of residence of accused
CIO: Town (or) Village (or) whether he is residing in town (or)
City of the Accused city is taken into consideration
while granting bails under non-
bailable offences.
04 C6: Non-bailable offence Test for proportion -0.1497 1.96 Factor of caste has no impact in
C ll: Caste sanctioning bails for non-bailable
1
offences.
05 C6: Non-bailable offence Test for proportion -0.48 1.96 Section under which bail application
C l 3: Section under which bail filed plays a significant role while
application filed granting bails under non-bailable
90 offences.
.
C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not Test for proportion -1.023 1.96 Gender has no influence in
C9: Gender discrimination sanctioning bails.
07 C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not Chiq-square test 0.0498 3.84 Residential background of accused
CIO: Town (or) Village (or) has no influence while sanctioning
City of the Accused bails.

426
08 Cl 1: Caste Chiq-square test 2.0900 3.84 Factor of caste has no influence in
60 C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not sanctioning bails.
C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not Test for proportion -1.765 1.96 While sanctioning bails, section
C l 3: Section under which bail under which bail application filed is
application filed having significant consideration.

o
C9: Gender discrimination Test for proportion -0.1497 1.96 Gender discrimination has no
C6: Non-bailable offence influence in sanctioning bails for
non-bailable offences.

r—
T—
^
<
C9: Gender discrimination Test for proportion -1.023 1.96 While granting bails to males and
C4: Nature offence (or) females the nature of offence
offence charged charged upon those accused, is not
taken into consideration.

r-H
96T
C9: Gender discrimination Test for proportion -1.023 Gender discrimination has no
C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not influence in sanctioning bails for
non-bailable offences.

m
C9: Gender discrimination Chi-square test 2.786 3.84 While granting bails to males and
CIO: Town (or) Village (or) females accused persons their
City of the Accused residence whether the accused
I
belongs to town (or) village (or) city
is not taken into consideration.
C9: Gender discrimination Chi-square test 2.786 3.84 While granting bails to males arid
i

Cl 1: Caste females their caste factor was not

taken into consideration.
C9: Gender discrimination Test for proportion -0.1497 1.96 While granting bails to males and
C l 3: Section under which bail females, section under which bail
application filed applications filed is not prominent
consideration.
427
 VO
CIO: Town (or) Village (or) Test for proportion 0.519 1.96 While granting bails under non-
City of the Accused bailable offences whether the
C6: Non-bailable offence accused belongs to the town (or)
village (or) city was not taken into
'
consideration.
CIO: Town (or) Village (or) Test for proportion - 2.133 1.96 More bails are granted as per the
City of the Accused nature of the offence charged upon
C4: Nature of offence (or) the accused. The accused if at all
offence charged belongs to the town (or) village (or)
city.

oo
CIO: Town (or) Village! (or) Chi-square test 0.0498 3.84 While sanctioning bails, town (or)
City of the Accused i
village (or) city of the accused are
Cl: Bail is sanctioned (or) not not taken into consideration.

(3\
CIO: Town (or) Village! (or) Chi-square test 1.205 3.84 Gender discrimination is not taken
City of the Accused into consideration for sanctioning
C9: Gender discrimination bails to the accused whether they
i
belongs to the village (or) city (or)
t town of the accused.
20 CIO: Town (or) Village! (or) Chi-square test 4.668 3.84 Caste is a significant factor for
City of the Accused granting bails to the accused of the
Cl 1: Caste town (or) village (or) city.

<N
rH
CIO: Town (or) Village (or) Test for proportion 0.519 1.96 Section under which bail application
City of the Accused is filed has no influence in
C l 3: Section under which bail sanctioning bails.
application filed
22 Cl 1: Caste Test for proportion -1.023 1.96 Caste has no influence for
C4: Nature of the offence (or) sanctioning of bails to accused as
offence charged per the nature of offence they
charged with.
23 Cl 1: Caste Test for proportion - 2.657 1.96 While granting bails under non-
C6: Non-bailable offence bailable offence the factor of caste
of the accused has no influence.
;
24 C ll: Caste Chi-square test 2.0940 3.84 While sanctioning bails to the
C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not accused the factor of caste is not
taken into consideration.
25 C ll:Caste Chi-square test 2.786 3.84 Caste has no influence in granting
C9: Gender discrimination bails as per the gender
discrimination.
26 C ll: Caste Chi-square test 4.975 3.84 Caste has influence upon the
CIO: Town (or) Village (or) granting of bails to the accused
City of the Accused j
whether they belong to the town (or)
village (or) city.
27 C ll: Caste » Test for proportion - 2.659 1.96 Caste is a factor where it has no
C l 3: Section under which bail influence upon the granting of bails
application filed as per the section under which bail
application is filed.
28 C13: Section under which bail Test for proportion -1.765 1.96 For granting bails under non-
application filed bailable offences, sections under
C6: Non-bailable offence which bail applications are filed are
i‘
not taken into consideration.
29 C13: Section under which bail Test for proportion - 1.765. 1.96 Bails are sanctioned not as per the
application filed section under which bail
C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not applications is filed.
30 C l 3: Section under which bail Test for proportion -0.1497 1.96 Gender discrimination is not taken
application filed into consideration while granting
C9: Gender discrimination bails as per the section under which
bail application is granted.

1—H

CO
C13: Section under which bail Test for proportion 0.519 1.96 Section under which bail application
application filed !
filed is no influence whether the
CIO: Town (or) Village' (or) accused belongs to town (or) village
City of the Accused i (or) city.
32 C13: Section under which' bail Test for proportion - 2.659 1.96 Caste has influence upon the section
application filed under which bail application is filed.
Cl 1: Caste
33 C4: Nature of offence (or) Test for proportion -2.659 1.96 Section under which bail application
offence charged filed has influence on the nature of
C l 3: Section under which bail offence charged.
application filed j

430
 PRINCIPAL DISTRICT COURT, GUNTUR - 2009

o
£
•

t/5
Combination of aspects Statistical / Technique Calculated Tabulated Inference / Conclusion
quantitative used value value
01 C6: Non-bailable offence Test for proportion -2.21510 1.96 Bails seen to be sanctioned rather
Cl: Bail is sanctioned (or) not than denied for non-bailable
offences.
02 Cl: Bail is sanctioned (or) not Test for proportion - 3.584 1.96 Gender has influence in the nature
C9: Gender discrimination of offence.
03 C6: Non-bailable offence’ Test for proportion - 2.3921 1.96 Place of residence of accused
CIO: Town (or) Village of the whether he is residing in town (or)
Accused city is taken into consideration
while granting bails under non-
bailable offences.
04 C6: Non-bailable offencei
Test for proportion -2.215 1.96 Caste has impact in sanctioning
Cl 1: Caste bails for non-bailable offences.
05 C6: Non-bailable offence; Test for proportion -3.588 1.96 Section under which bail application
C13: Section under which bail filed plays a significant role while
application filed . | i
granting bails under non-bailable
i i offences.
90

o
oo
o
oo
Cl: Bail is sanctioned (or) not Chi-square test 3.84 Gender has no influence in
C9: Gender discrimination sanctioning bails.

o
Cl: Bail is sanctioned (or) not Chiq-square test 1.725 3.84 Residential background of accused
CIO: Town (or) Village Of the has no influence while sanctioning
Accused bails.
08 Cl: Bail is sanctioned (or) jnot Test for proportion -2.215 1.96 Caste has influence in sanctioning
Cl 1: Caste 1
bails.
431
 o
o
o
09 C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not Chi-square test 3.84 While sanctioning bails, section
C13: Section under which bail under which bail application filed is
application filed not to having significant
consideration.

t—H
o
C9: Gender discrimination Test for proportion - 3.588 1.96 Gender discrimination has no
C6: Non-bailable offence influence in sanctioning bails for
non-bailable offences.

i—»
C9: Gender discrimination Test for proportion 0.204 1.96 While granting bails to males and
C4: Nature offence (or) females the nature of offence
offence charged charged upon those accused is not
taken into consideration.

r-H
C9: Gender discrimination Chi-square test 0.6748 3.84 Gender discrimination has no
C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not influence in sanctioning bails for
non-bailable offences.

t—H
m
C9: Gender discrimination Chi-square test 0.8792 3.84 While granting bails to males and
CIO: Town (or) Village of the females accused persons their
Accused 1

t residence whether the accused

belongs to town (or) village (or) city
is not taken into consideration.

i—<
C9: Gender discrimination Test for proportion -3.561 1.96 While granting bails to males and
Cl 1: Caste |
females their caste taken into
consideration.
C9: Gender discrimination: Test for proportion -3.561 1.96 While granting bails to males and
C13: Section under which bail females, section under which bail
application filed applications filed is not prominent
consideration.
 VO
CIO: Town (or) Village of the Test for proportion - 2.3921 1.96 While granting bails under non-
Accused bailable offences whether the
C6: Non-bailable offence accused belongs to the town (or)
village (or) city was not taken into
consideration.
CIO: Town (or) Village (or) Test for proportion -1.069 1.96 The town or village or city of the
City of the Accused accused are not compared with the
C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not nature of offence or offence
charged.

oo
.
CIO: Town (or) Village of the Chi-square test 1.725 3.84 While sanctioning bails, town (or)
|
Accused village (or) city of the accused are
C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not not taken into consideration.

OV
i
CIO: Town (or) Village of the Chi-square test 0.8792 3.84 Gender discrimination is not taken
Accused 1 into consideration for sanctioning
C9: Gender discrimination ; bails to the accused whether they
t i belongs to the village (or) city (or)
! town of the accused.
20 CIO: Town (or) Village of the Chi-square test 0.861 3.84 Caste is a significant factor for
Accused consideration while granting bails to
Cl 1: Caste the accused of the town (or) village
(or) city.

<N
CIO: Town (or) Village of the Test for proportion - 0.914 1.96 Section under which bail application
Accused !
is filed has no influence in
C l 3: Section under which bail sanctioning bails.
application filed
22 C ll:Caste Test for proportion - 2.508 1.96 Caste has no influence for
C4: Nature of the offence (or) sanctioning of bails to accused as
offence charged per the nature of offence they
charged with.
23 C ll:Caste Test for proportion 0.0845 1.96 While granting bails under non-
C6: Non-bailable offence bailable offence the factor of caste
of the accused has no influence.
24 C ll:Caste Test for proportion -1.757 1.96 While sanctioning bails to the
C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not accused caste is not taken into
consideration.
25 C ll:Caste Test for proportion 0.5467 1.96 Caste has no influence in granting
C9: Gender discrimination bails as per the gender
discrimination.

-st-
cn
oo
26 C ll:Caste Chi-square test 0.861 Caste has influence upon the
CIO: Town (or) Village of the granting of bails to the accused
Accused whether they belong to the town (or)
village (or) city.
27 C ll: Caste Test for proportion 0.914 1.96 Caste has no influence upon the
C13: Section under which bail granting of bails as per the section
application filed under which bail application is filed.
28 C l 3: Section under which bail Test for proportion -3.588 1.96 For granting bails under non-
application filed bailable offences, sections under
C6: Non-bailable offence which bail applications are taken
into consideration.
29 C l 3:Section under which bail Chi-square test 0.299 3.84 Bails are sanctioned not as per the
application filed section under which bail application
C9: Gender discrimination is filed.
434
 22 C l 1: Caste Test for proportion - 2.508 1.96 Caste has no influence ; for
C4: Nature o f the offence (or) sanctioning o f bails to accused as
offence charged per the nature o f offence they
I
---------- !
_ __ charged with.
23 C l 1: Caste Test for proportion 0.0845 1.96 W hile granting bails under non-
C6: Non-bailable offence bailable offence the factor o f caste
o f the accused has no influence.
24 C ll: Caste Test for proportion ! - 1.757 1.96 W hile sanctioning bails to the
C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not accused caste is not taken into
consideration.
25 C ll: Caste j Test for proportion 0.5467 1.96
|
Caste has no influence in granting
C9: Gender discrimination bails as per the gender
;

i
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- discrimination.
26 C ll: Caste Chi-square test 0.861 3.84 / Caste has influence upon the
CIO: Town (or) Village o f the granting o f bails to the accused
Accused whether they belong to the town (or)
village (or) city.
27 C ll: Caste Test for proportion 0.914 1.96 Caste has no influence upon the
C13: Section under w hich bail granting o f bails as per the section
application filed under which bail application is filed.

oo
C l 3: Section under which bail Test for proportion -3.588 1.96 For granting bails under non-
application filed bailable offences, sections under
C6: Non-bailable offence which bail applications are taken
into consideration.
29 C13: Section under which bail Chi-square test 0.299 3.84 Bails are sanctioned not as per the
application filed section under which bail application
C9: Gender discrimination is filed.
434
30 C l 3:Section under which bail Test for proportion -3.561 1.96 Gender discrimination is taken into
application filed consideration while granting bails as
C9: Gender discrimination per the sections under which bail
application is granted.

m
T—H
C13: Section under which bail Test for proportion - 3.588 1.96 Section under which bail application
application filed filed has influence whether the
CIO: Town (or) Village of the accused belongs to town (or) village
Accused (or) city.
32 C l 3: Section under which bail Test for proportion 0.914 1.96 Caste has influence upon the section
application filed under which bail application is filed.
Cl 1: Caste
33 C4: Nature of offence (or) Test for proportion - 2.588 1.96 Section under which bail application
offence charged filed has influence on the nature of
C l 3: Section under which bail offence charged.
application filed
 I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, GUNTUR - 2007

o
£
•

GC
Combination of aspects Statistical / Technique Calculated Tabulated Inference / Conclusion
quantitative used value value

o
C6: Non-bailable offence Test for proportion 0.407 1.96 Bails seen to be sanctioned rather
C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not than denied for non-bailable
offences.
02 C6: Non-bailable offence Test for proportion -1.764 1.96 Gender has no influence in the
C9: Gender discrimination nature of offence.

m
C6: Non-bailable offence Test for proportion | - 3.688 1.96 Place of residence of accused
f

o .
CIO: Town (or) Village of the (Village of city) while granting bails
Accused under non-bailable offences.

o
o
i>
04 C6: Non-bailable offence Test for proportion 1.96 Caste has impact in sanctioning
Cl 1: Caste bails for non-bailable offences.
05 C6: Non-bailable offence Test for proportion -5.137 1.96 Section under which bail application
C13: Section under which bail filed plays a significant role while
application filed granting bails under non-bailable
90 offences.
C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not Chi-square test 0.01412 3.84 Gender has no influence in
C9: Gender discrimination sanctioning bails.
07 C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not Chiq-square test - 1.8242 3.84 Residential background of accused
CIO: Town (or) Village of the has no influence while sanctioning
Accused bails.
08 C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not Test for proportion -1.764 1.96 Caste has influence in sanctioning
C ll: Caste bails.

436
09 C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not Chi-square test 1.623 3.84 While sanctioning bails, section
C13: Section under which bail under which bail application filed is
application filed not having significant consideration.

<1 ■ ^
o
C9: Gender discrimination Test for proportion -1.764 1.96 Gender discrimination has no
C6: Non-bailable offence influence in sanctioning bails for
non-bailable offences.

r—
t
o
o
C9: Gender discrimination Test for proportion 1.96 While granting bails to males and
C4: Nature offence (or) females the nature of offence
offence charged charged upon those accused is not
taken into consideration.

<N
C9: Gender discrimination Test for proportion - 3.509 1.96 Residential background/gender of
CIO: Town (or) Village of the the accused are influencing each
accused other among the applications.

CO
""t
o
o
o
C9: Gender discrimination Test for proportion 1.96 Caste and gender are not related.
C ll: Caste

T*~<
C9: Gender discrimination Chi-square test 1.8087 3.84 While granting bails to males and
0 3 : Section under which bail females section under which bail
application filed application filed not prominent
consideration.

VO
1—H
CIO: Town (or) Village of the Test for proportion 3.688 1.96 While granting bails under non-
Accused bailable offences whether the
C6: Non-bailable offence accused belongs to the town or
village or city was taken into
consideration.
r~-4
V©
CIO: Town (or) Village of the Test for proportion 0.407 1.96 More bails are not granted as per the
Accused nature of offence charged up on the
C4: Nature of offence (or) accused. The accused if at all
offences charged belongs to the town or village or
city.

i—H
t--
CIO: Town (or) Village (or) Chi-square test 0.098 3.84 While sanctioning bails town or
City of the Accused village or city of the accused are not
C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not taken into consideration.

oo
CIO: Town (or) Village of the Test for proportion - 3.509 1.96 Gender discrimination is taken into
Accused consideration while granting bails to
C9: Gender discrimination the accused of the town or village or
city.

r—H
as
'3-
o
o
t"
CIO: Town (or) Village of the Chi-square test 1.96 Caste is a significant factor for
Accused consideration while granting bails to
Cl 1: Caste the accused of the town or village or
city.
20 CIO: Town (or) Village of the Chi-square test 0.026 3.84 Section under which bail application
Accused is filed has no influence is
C13: Section under which bail sanctioning bails.
application filed

<N
fim,<
o
l>
©
ON
VO

Cl 1: Caste Test for proportion Caste has no influence for

C4: Nature of the offence (or) sanctioning of bails to the accused
offence charged as per the nature of the offence they
charged with.
22 Cl 1: Caste Test for proportion - 3.509 1.96 While granting bails under non-
C6: Non-bailable offence bailable offence the factor of caste
of the accused has influence.
438
 o
o
23 Cl 1: Caste Test for proportion 1.96 While sanctioning bails to accused
C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not caste is not taken into consideration.

©
o
24 Cl 1: Caste Test for proportion 1.96 Caste has no influence in granting
C9: Gender discrimination bails as per the gender
discrimination.

"5t
o
©
25 C ll:Caste Test for proportion 1.96 Caste has no influence upon the
CIO: Town (or) Village of the granting of bails to the accused
Accused whether they belong to the town or
village or city.
26 C ll: Caste Test for proportion 0.042 1.96 Caste is a factor whether it has no
C l 3: Section under which bail influence upon the granting of bails
application filed as per the section under which bail
application is filed.
27 C l 3:Section under which bail Test for proportion -5.137 1.96 For granting bails under non-
application filed bailable offences, sections under
C6: Non-bailable offence which bail applications are filed are
taken into consideration.

(N
oo
C13: Section under which bail Chi-square test 1.623 3.84 Bails are sanctioned not as per the
application filed section under which bail application
C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not is filed.
o
oo
oo
C"
29 C13: Section under which bail Chi-square test 3.84 Gender discrimination is not taken
application filed into consideration while granting
C9: Gender discrimination bails under which bail application is
filed.
 ©
<N
O
30 C l 3: Section under which bail Chi-square test 3.84 Section under which hail application
application filed is filed has no influence whether the
CIO: Town (or) Village of the accused belongs to the town or
Accused village or city.

r*H
m
C13: Section under which bail Test for proportion 0.042 1,96 Caste has influence upon the section
application filed under which bail application is filed.
Cl 1: Caste

CN
©
o
r-

m.
C4: Nature of offence (or) Test for proportion 1.96 Section under which bail application
offence charged filed has influence on the nature of
C l 3: Section under which bail offence charged.
application filed
 I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, GUNTUR - 2008

«3
£
o
•
Combination of aspects Statistical / Technique Calculated Tabulated Inference / Conclusion
quantitative used value value

o
!
C6: Non-bailable offence Test for proportion -2.25 1.96 Less bails are sanctioned for non--

[
C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not bailable offences
02 C6: Non-bailable offence Test for proportion - 3.571 1.96 Gende has influence in the nature of
£0 C9: Gender discrimination offence.
C6: Non-bailable offence Test for proportion 0.744 1.96 Place of residence of accused in
CIO: Town (or) Village of the town or village or city is not taken
Accused into consideration while, granting
1 ------------------- bails under non-bailable offences.
04 C6: Non-bailable offence Test for proportion -2.25 1.96 Cast has influence in sanctioning
Cl 1: Caste bails for non-bailable offences.
05 C6: Non-bailable offence Test for proportion -3.171 1.96 Section under which bail application
Cl3: Section under which bail filed plays a significant role while
application filed granting bails under non-bailable
90 offences.
C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not Chi-square test 12.866 3.84 Gender has influence in sanctioning
C9: Gender discrimination bails.
07 C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not Chiq-square test 0.03821 3.84 Residential background of accused
CIO: Town (or) Village of the has no influence in sanctioning
Accused bails.
08 Cl: Bail is sanctioned (or) not Test for proportion 0.744 1.96 Caste has no influence in
1

i Cl 1: Caste sanctioning bails.

441
 09 C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not Chi-square test 0.027 3.84 While sanctioning bails, section
C13: Section under which bail under which bail application filed is
application filed not having significant consideration.

o
C9: Gender discrimination Test for proportion -3.571 1.96 Gender has influence in sanctioning
C6: Non-bailable offence it bails for non-bailable offences.

r-M
rH
C9: Gender discrimination Test for proportion 0.744 1.96 While granting bails to males and
C4: Nature offence (or) females the nature of offence
offence charged charged upon those accused, is not
taken into consideration.

r—H
(N
C9: Gender discrimination Chi-square test 0.439 3.84 While granting bails to males and
CIO: Town (or) Village of the females accused persons their
accused residence whether the accused
belongs to town or village or city

i
was not taken into consideration.

m
C9: Gender discrimination Test for proportion 0.013 1.96 While granting bails to males and
C ll: Caste females their caste factor was not
taken into consideration.

T-H
t
C9: Gender discrimination Chi-square test 0.0565 3.84 While granting bails to males and
C13: Section under which bail females section under which bail
application filed application filed not prominent
consideration.

1—H
in
CIO: Town (or) Village of the Test for proportion 0.744 1.96 While granting bails under non-
Accused bailable offences whether the
C6: Non-bailable offence accused belongs to the town or
village or city was taken into
consideration.

442
r*H
VO
CIO: Town (or) Village of the Test for proportion -3.171 1.96 More bails are granted as per the
Accused nature of offence charged upon the
C4: Nature of offence (or) accused. The accused if at all
offences charged belongs to the town or village or
city.

r-
CIO: Town (or) Village (or) Chi-square test 0.05927 3.84 While sanctioning bails town or
City of the Accused village or city of the accused are not
Cl: Bail is sanctioned (or) not taken into consideration.

r-H
oo
CIO: Town (or) Village of the Chi-square test 0.439 3.84 Gender discrimination is not taken
Accused into consideration while granting
C9: Gender discrimination bails to the accused of the town or
1 village or city.

l
t
On
CIO: Town (or) Village of the Test for proportion 0.013 1.96 Caste is not a significant factor for
Accused consideration while granting bails to
C ll: Caste the accused of the town or village or
city.
20 CIO: Town (or) Village of the Test for proportion -3.171 1.96 Section under which bail application
Accused is filed has influence is sanctioning
C13: Section under which bail bails.
application filed

<N
C ll: Caste Test for proportion 0.744 1.96 Caste has no influence for
C4: Nature of the offence (or) sanctioning of bails to the accused
offence charged as per the nature of the offence they
charged with.
22 C ll:Caste Test for proportion -2.25 1.96 While granting bails under non-
C6: Non-bailable offence bailable offence the factor of caste
i

of the accused has influence.

23 C ll: Caste Test for proportion 0.744 1.96 While sanctioning bails to accused
C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not caste is not taken into consideration.
24 C ll: Caste Test for proportion 0.013 1.96 Caste has no influence in granting
C9: Gender discrimination bails as per the gender
1

discrimination.
25 C ll: Caste Test for proportion 0.013 1.96 Caste has no influence upon the
1

CIO: Town (or) Village of the granting of bails to the accused

Accused whether they belong to the town or
village or city.
26 C ll:Caste Test for proportion -3.171 1.96 Caste is a factor whether it has no
C13: Section under which bail influence upon the granting of bails
i
application filed as per the section under which bail
application is filed.
27 C13: Section under which bail Test for proportion -3.171 1.96 For granting bails under non-
application filed bailable offences, sections under
C6: Non-bailable offence which bail applications are filed are
taken into consideration.

<N
oo
C13: Section under which bail Chi-square test 0.027 3.84 Bails are sanctioned not as per the
application filed section under which bail application
Cl: Bail is sanctioned (or) not is filed.
29 C13: Section under which bail Chi-square test 0.0439 3.84 Gender discrimination is not taken
application filed into consideration while granting
C9: Gender discrimination bails under which bail application is
filed.
30 C13: Section under which bail Test for proportion -3.171 1.96 Section under which bail application
application filed is filed has no influence whether the
CIO: Town (or) Village of the accused belongs to the town or
Accused village or city.

ro
C13: Section under which bail Test for proportion -3.171 1.96 Caste has influence upon the section
application filed under which bail application is filed.
C ll: Caste

<N
m
C4: Nature of offence (or) Test for proportion - 2.486 1.96 Section under which bail application
offence charged is filed has influence on the nature
C l 3: Section under which bail of offence charged.
application filed
 I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, GUNTUR - 2009

55
o
•
Combination of aspects Statistical / Technique Calculated Tabulated Inference / Conclusion
quantitative used value value

v—H
O
C6: Non-bailable offence Test for proportion -2.19 1.96 Less bails are sanctioned for non-
Cl: Bail is sanctioned (or) not bailable offences
02 C6: Non-bailable offence Test for proportion - 4.446 1.96 Gende has influence in the nature of
C9: Gender discrimination offence.
03 C6: Non-bailable offence Test for proportion - 4.587 1.96 Place of residence of accused
CIO: Town (or) Village of the whether he is residing in town or
Accused village or city is taken into
consideration while, granting bails
under non-bailable offences.
04 C6: Non-bailable offence Test for proportion -2.19 1.96 Cast has influence in sanctioning
Cl 1: Caste bails for non-bailable offences.
05 C6: Non-bailable offence Test for proportion - 4.882 1.96 Section under which bail application
C l 3: Section under which bail filed plays a significant role while
I

application filed granting bails under non-bailable

90 offences.
Cl: Bail is sanctioned (or) not Chi-square test 4.065 3.84 Gender has influence in sanctioning
C9: Gender discrimination bails.
07 Cl: Bail is sanctioned (or) not Chiq-square test 3.341 3.84 Residential background of accused
CIO; Town (or) Village of the has no influence in sanctioning
Accused bails.
08 Cl: Bail is sanctioned (or) not Test for proportion -2.19 1.96 Caste has no influence in
Cl 1: Caste sanctioning bails.

446
 Z9LV0
09 C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not Chi-square test 3.84 While sanctioning bails, section
C l 3:Section under which bail under which bail application filed is
application filed not having significant consideration.

o
r—H
C9: Gender discrimination Test for proportion -4.446 1.96 Gender has influence in sanctioning
C6: Non-bailable offence bails for non-bailable offences.

r—H
r—(
C9: Gender discrimination Test for proportion - 4.882 1.96 While granting bails to males and
C4: Nature offence (or) females the nature of offence
offence charged charged upon those accused, is not
taken into consideration.

r—i
<N
C9: Gender discrimination Chi-square test 0.2529 3.84 While granting bails to males and
CIO: Town (or) Village of the females accused persons their
accused residence whether the accused
belongs to town or village or city
was not taken into consideration.

(
i
m
■'t
o
oo
C9: Gender discrimination Test for proportion 1.96 While granting bails to males and
Cl 1: Caste females their caste factor was not
taken into consideration.

r—*
C9: Gender discrimination CLi-square test 2.1916 3.84 While granting bails to males and
C l 3: Section under which bail i
females section under which bail
application filed application filed not prominent
consideration.

y—H
CIO: Town (or) Village of the Test for proportion - 4.587 1.96 While granting bails under non-
Accused bailable offences whether the
C6: Non-bailable offence accused belongs to the town or
village or city was taken into
consideration.
 1

r—I
VO
00
o
CIO: Town (or) Village of the Test for proportion 1.96 More bails are granted as per the
Accused nature of offence charged upon the
C4: Nature of offence (or) accused. The accused if at all
offences charged belongs to the town or village or
city.
CIO: Town (or) Village (or) Chi-square test 3.341 3.84 While sanctioning bails town or
City of the Accused village or city of the accused are not
C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not taken into consideration.

H
00
CIO: Town (or) Village of the Chi-square test 0.2529 3.84 Gender discrimination is not taken
Accused into consideration while granting
C9: Gender discrimination bails to the accused of the town or
village or city.
19 CIO: Town (or) Village of the Test for proportion - 2.509 1.96 Caste is not a significant factor for
Accused consideration while granting bails to
Cl 1: Caste the accused of the town or village or
city.
20 CIO: Town (or) Village of the Chi-square test 0.1347 3.84 Section under which bail application
Accused is filed has influence in sanctioning
C13: Section under which bail bails.
application filed

i—K
C ll: Caste Test for proportion 0.002 1.96 Caste has no influence for
C4: Nature of the offence (or) sanctioning of bails to the accused
offence charged as per the nature of the offence they
charged with.
22 C ll:Caste Test for proportion -2.19 1.96 While granting bails under non-
C6: Non-bailable offence bailable offence the factor of caste
of the accused has influence.
23 Cl 1: Caste Test for proportion -2.19 1.96 While sanctioning bails to accused
C7: Bail is sanctioned (or) not caste is taken into consideration.
24 Cl 1: Caste Test for proportion -4.480 1.96 Caste has influence in granting bajls
C9: Gender discrimination as per the gender discrimination.
125 Cl 1: Caste Test for proportion - 2.509 1.96 Caste has influence upon the
CIO: Town (or) Village of the granting of bails to the accused
Accused i
whether they belong to the town or
village or city.
26 Cl 1: Caste Test for proportion -2.19 1.96 Caste is a factor whether it has no
C13: Section under which bail influence upon the granting of bails
application filed as per the section under which bail
application is filed.
27 C l 3:Section under which bail Test for proportion - 4.882 1.96 For granting bails under non-
application filed bailable offences, sections under
C6: Non-bailable offence which bail applications are filed are
■ taken into consideration.

oo
<N
C l 3: Section under which bail Chi-square test 0.4762 3.84 Bails are sanctioned not as per the
application filed section under which bail application
Cl: Bail is sanctioned (or) not is filed.
29 C l 3: Section under which bail Chi-square test 2.1816 3.84 Gender discrimination is not taken
application filed into consideration while granting
C9: Gender discrimination bails under which bail application is
filed.
30 C l 3:Section under which bail Test for proportion 0.1347 3.84 Section under which bail application
application filed is filed has no influence whether the
CIO: Town (or) Village of the accused belongs to the town or
Accused village or city.
449
T—«1
m
1
C13: Section under which bail Test for proportion -2.19 1.96 Caste has no influence upon the
application filed section under which bail application
C ll: Caste is filed.
32 C4: Nature of offence (or) Test for proportion -2.39 1.96 Section under which bail application
offence charged is filed has influence on the nature
C13: Section under which bail of offence charged.
application filed
S.No. Combination of PDC PDC PDC I ADC I ADC I ADC
Aspects 2007 2008 2009 2007 2008 2009
01 C6, Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl C6 C6
02 C6, C9 C6 C6 C6 C6 C9 C9
03 C6, CIO CIO C6 CIO CIO C6 CIO
04 C6, Cll C6 C6 Cll C6 Cll Cll
05 C6, C13 C13 C6 C13 C13 C13 C13
06 C7, C9 Cl Cl Cl Cl C9 C9
07 Cl, CIO Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl
08 Cll, C7 Cl Cl Cll Cl Cl Cll
09 Cl, C13 C13 Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl
10 C9, C6 C6 C6 C9 C6 C9 C9
11 C9,C4 C4 C9 C9 C9 C9 C9
12 C9, Cl C7 • Cl Cl Cl C9 C9
13 C9, CIO C9 C9 C9 CIO C9 C9
14 C9, Cll C9 C9 Cll C9 C9 Cll
15 C9, C13 C9 C9 C13 C9 C9 C9
16 CIO, C6 CIO C6 CIO CIO C6 CIO
17 CIO, C4 C4 C4 CIO C4 C4 C4
18 CIO, Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl
19 CIO, C9 C9 C9 C9 CIO C9 C9
20 CIO, Cll CIO Cll CIO CIO CIO CIO
21 CIO, C13 C13 CIO CIO CIO C13 CIO
22 Cll, C4 C4 C4 Cll C4 C4 C4
23 Cll, C6 C6 C6 Cll C6 Cll Cll
24 Cll, C7 Cl Cl Cll Cl Cl Cll

451
S.No. Combination of PDC PDC PDC I ADC I ADC I ADC
Aspects 2007 2008 2009 2007 2008 2009
25 Cll, C9 C9 C9 Cll C9 C9 Cll
26 Cll,CIO CIO Cll CIO Cll CIO Cll
27 Cll, C13 C13 Cll C13 C13 Cll Cll
28 C6, C13 C13 C6 C13 C13 C13 C13
29 . C13, C9 C9 C9 C13 C9 C9 C9
30 C13, CIO C13 CIO CIO CIO C13 CIO
31 C13, Cll C13 Cll C13 C13 Cll Cll
32 C4, C13 C13 C13 C13 C4 C13 C13

In the above table the word “C” indicates clumns in the main table.

Among the combination of aspects given in the table which column is

repeatedly seen in the six years chart or which column is seen for number

of times in those yers is taken as final conclusion in the following table:

S.No. Combination Final Conclusion

of Aspects
01 C6, Cl As C7 is seen in four successive years more bails
seen to tbe sanctioned rather than denied for non-
bailable offences.
02 C6, C9 As C6 is seen in four successive years C9 i.e.,
Gender discrimination has no impact in granting
non-bailable offences.
03 C6, CIO As CIO i.e., Place of residence of accused (his
village or town or city) has influence in granting
bails.

452
S.No. Combination Final Conclusion
of Aspects
04 C6, Cll Both caste and granting of bails to non-bailable
offences are no way related to each other. It
means caste has no influence in granting bails.
05 C6, C13 While granting bails in case of non-bailable
offences sections under which bail applications
filed plays significant role.
06 C7, C9 Gender discrimination has no place in sanctioning
bails.
07 C7, CIO Place of residence accused was no way connected
in sanctioning bails inn court of law.
08 Cll, C7 Caste has no impact in sanctioning bails.
09 C7, C13 Section under which bail applications filed has no
impact in sanctioning bails.
10 C9, C6 As C6 is seen in four successive years C9 i.e,
Gender discrimination has no impact in granting
non-bailable offences.
11 C9, C4 Nature of offence charged upon the accused taken
into consideration while granting bails.
12 C9, C7 Gender has no influence in sanctioning bails. 1
13 C9, CIO Gender discrimination is seen when it comes to
the point of accused place of residence.
14 C9, Cll Gender discrimination plays significant role than
the caste.
15 C9, C13 Gender discrimination plays a significant role
when it is compared with section under which bail
application filed.

453
S.No. Combination Final Conclusion
of Aspects
16 CIO, C6 As CIO i.e., place of residence of accused (his
village or town or city) has influence in granting
bails.
17 CIO, C4 Nature of offence charged upon the accused taken
into consideration while granting bails.
18 CIO, C7 Place of residence of accused was no way
connected in sanctioning bails in court of law.
19 CIO, C9 Gender discrimination is seen when it comes to
the point of accused place of residence.
20 CIO, Cl 1 Place of residence is taken into consideration
while granting bails to the accused.
21 CIO, C13 Place of residence is taken into consideration
while granting bails to the accused.
22 Cll, C4 Nature of offence charged upon the accused taken
into consideration while granting bails.
23 Cll, C6 Both caste and granting of bails to non-bailable
offences are no way related to each other. It
means, caste has no influence in sanctioning bails.
.24 Cll, C7 Caste has no impact :a sanctioning bails.
25 Cll, C9 Gender discrimination plays significant role than
the caste.
26 Cll, CIO Place of residence is taken into consideration
while granting bails to the accused.
27 Cll, C13 Caste and section under which bail application
filed are in no way inter-related to each other.

454
S.No. Combination Final Conclusion
of Aspects
28 C6, C13 While granting bails in case of non-bailable
offences sections under which bail applications
filed plays significant role.
29 C13, C9 Gender discrimination plays a significant role
when it is compared with section under which bail
application filed.
30 03, CIO Place of residence is taken into consideration
while granting bails to the accused.
31 03,01 Caste and Section under which bail application
filed are in no way iner-related to each other.
32 C4,03 Section under which bail applications filed is
taken into consideration when it is compared with
nature of offence charged upon the accused.

From the above table the final conclusion derived is that, the bails

are generally granted by the Court of law depending upon the nature of

offence charged upon the accused in each own facts and circumstances of

the case.

455