R E S E A R C H R E P O R T

Senior Residents’ Views on the Meaning of

Professionalism and How They Learn about It
A. Keith W. Brownell, MD, and Luc Côté, MSW, PhD
Downloaded from https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3YiN3qTGLcvLVrjoFhoonGHhco5qxkzr5eXDEqZ8vskM= on 05/04/2020

ABSTRACT

Purpose. To determine senior residents’ views on the by more than 100 respondents, were respect, competence,
meaning of professionalism and how they learned about and empathy. The respondents had learned the most
it. about professionalism from observing role models, they
Method. By means of a modified Dillman technique, all rated the quantity and quality of teaching about it posi-
senior residents at two faculties of medicine (n = 533) tively, and they felt comfortable explaining professional-
were surveyed about professionalism during the 1998–99 ism to a junior resident. Only 56% of the residents cor-
academic year. The residents were asked to list attributes rectly identified the Canadian medical organization most
of professionalism and to rank methods they found most concerned with professionalism.
useful for learning about professionalism, to rate the ad- Conclusion. Residents’ knowledge about professional-
equacy and quality of their teaching about professionalism ism reflects their early stage of development as physicians
and their comfort in explaining the concept of profes- and their daily activities, where such aspects of profes-
sionalism to a more junior trainee, to list suggestions sionalism as the social contract, codes of ethics, partici-
about how teaching about professionalism could be im- pation in professional societies, and altruism are not high-
proved, and to name the medical organization most con- lighted. Residency programs should develop teaching
cerned with matters of professionalism. activities focusing on professionalism that relate to issues
Results. A total of 258 residents (48.4%) responded. residents face in their daily work.
They listed 1,052 attributes they associated with profes- Acad. Med. 2001;76:734–737.
sionalism. The three most common attributes, all listed

Medical professionalism and the profes- medical students, residents, or even 䡲 year two of a family medicine pro-
sion of medicine are attracting consid- practicing physicians actually know gram;
erable attention in the medical litera- about the topics. Therefore, we assessed 䡲 year three (and beyond) in a Royal
ture, particularly with regard to the senior residents’ views about profession- College of Physicians and Surgeons of
need for teaching about these topics alism and how they had learned about Canada (RCPSC) primary certifica-
during undergraduate and residency ed- it; the results of which are reported tion program;
ucation.1–7 Yet, despite this discussion, here. 䡲 any subspecialty program; and
few data are available to indicate what 䡲 any non-accredited training program
beyond a primary certification or sub-
METHOD specialty program.
Dr. Brownell is professor, Department of Clinical
Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, During the 1998–99 academic year, we Medical and surgical specialties and
Canada. Dr. Côté is associate professor, Department
of Family Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, invited all senior residents at Laval subspecialties were classified according
Canada. University (LU) (n = 334) and the to the listing used by the RCPSC.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Brownell, University of Calgary (UC) (n = 199) For this study, we used a modified
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of to participate in this study. We defined Dillman8 method. In the fall of 1998,
Calgary, Foothills Hospital, 1403 29th Street NW,
Calgary, AB, Canada, T2N 2T9; e-mail: 具kbrownel a senior resident as any resident in one we sent all senior residents a package
@ucalgary.ca典. Reprints are not available. of the following groups: containing a letter of introduction from

734 ACADEMIC MEDICINE, VOL. 76, NO. 7 / JULY 2001

the investigators outlining the purpose One of the investigators (LC) and Table 1
of the study, the methods used to main- the research assistant independently
tain confidentiality, an invitation to carried out an initial content analysis of Senior Residents’ Responses to the
participate, the questionnaire, and a the qualitative data (triangulation pro- Attributes of Professionalism by
self-addressed envelope for returning cess) as outlined by Miles and Huber- Frequency of Selection, Laval University
the questionnaire. About two months man.9 The two investigators jointly car- and University of Calgary, 1998–99
later, we sent to non-responders a sec- ried out the final classification by
ond mailing that contained a letter of consensus and then the data were rank- No. of
Residents’
introduction along with all the material ordered. We calculated means and stan-
Attribute Responses*
that had been circulated with the first dard deviations for the quantitative
mailing. About a month later, we car- data and subjected the results to mul- Competence 129
ried out a third mailing to non-respond- tiple regression analysis. Respect 123
ers with the same material. To maintain Empathy 101
Both faculties of medicine gave eth-
Honesty/integrity 62
the confidentiality of both respondents ical approval to the study. Responsibility 62
and non-respondents, neither of the in- Collegiality 55
vestigators took part in developing the RESULTS Confidentiality 50
nominal–numerical lists, the handling Up-to-date medical
of returned questionnaires to determine Demographics knowledge 49
who had responded, or the construction Courteous 45
of the lists for any of the three mailings. Good communicator 44
The overall response rate, 48.4% (258 Ethical 44
The questionnaire was developed
of 533 residents), was virtually identical Good clinical judgment 34
specifically for this study and was field
to that for each of the faculties. Of the Good organization 33
tested on a small number of residents Self-appraisal 32
total number of residents surveyed,
and faculty before being finalized. The Calm 30
22.1% were in family medicine, 56.4%
questionnaire collected demographic Devoted 19
were in medical specialties, and 21.5%
data that included each resident’s train- Manage uncertainty 18
were in surgical specialties, and those Scientific rigor 17
ing level, program, gender, and age. We
responding, 26% were from family med- Justice 16
asked each resident to list five words or
icine, 51.5% from medical specialties, Passion for medicine 16
phrases (attributes) he or she associated
and 21.3% from surgical specialties. Openness of spirit 16
with the term professionalism and to Tact 16
There were 1.2% of respondents who
rank-order a list of seven methods (in- Pay attention to details 11
could not be classified because of in-
cluding an option to write in methods Humble 10
complete data. Women made up 54.8%
not listed) he or she had found most Leadership 7
of the total resident body at LU and Put patient needs first 6
useful for learning about professional-
42% of the total resident body at UC, Climate of confidence 4
ism. The resident was asked to indicate,
and the response rates for women were Balance between personal
by means of a Likert scale (ranging from
55.3% from LU and 42.7% from UC. and professional life 3
1 = very inadequate to 7 = very ade-
The mean ages of respondents, 29.2 *Numbers refer to the total numbers of residents
quate), his or her view on the quantity
years at LU and 31.3 years at UC, were listing the attributes.
and quality of teaching about profes-
similar to the mean ages for all residents
sionalism in his or her program. The
resident was asked to list suggestions at LU (30.1 years) and at UC (32.1
whereby teaching about professionalism years). (123), and empathy (101), and the
could be improved in his or her pro- three least commonly listed attributes
gram. Again, by means of a Likert scale Attributes were put patient needs first (6), climate
(ranging from 1 = very uncomfortable of confidence (4), and balance between
to 7 = very comfortable), we asked the The 258 respondents listed a total of personal and professional life (3).
resident to indicate his or her degree of 1,052 attributes of professionalism. A majority of the residents in either
comfort in explaining the meaning of Qualitative analysis yielded 28 groups of program listed contact with positive
professionalism to a more junior trainee. attributes (see Table 1). Fifteen of the role models as their preferred method of
Finally, we asked the resident to name attributes were selected by 30 or more learning about professionalism (Table
the Canadian medical organization or respondents. The three most commonly 2), followed by contact with patients
body he or she believed to be most con- listed attributes were (in order of fre- and their next of kin, and contact with
cerned with matters of professionalism. quency) competence (129), respect negative role models.

ACADEMIC MEDICINE, VOL. 76, NO. 7 / JULY 2001 735

Table 2 residency did not make a difference to
at least the main attributes the residents
chose. Looking at the data by gender,
Senior Residents’ Responses for the Most Useful Methods for Learning Professionalism by
Program and Gender, Laval University and University of Calgary, 1998–99
men and women listed the same top
three attributes (competence, respect,
Method* and empathy). Since there is no other
study like ours in the literature, it is im-
Contact with Contact with Contact with
possible to compare directly the list of
Positive-role-model Patients and Their Negative-role-model
Clinical Teachers Next of Kin Clinical Teachers
attributes that emerged from our data
Speciality % % % with those from other reports. Yet, in
our review of articles that list attributes
Family medicine commonly associated with profession-
Men (n = 28) 89 42 28
alism,1,7,10 we found many of the same
Women (n = 39) 90 63 34
terms, which indicates that there are
Medical specialties
similarities between our findings and
Men (n = 69) 94 52 38 those of others, at least qualitatively.
Women (n = 63) 99 47 52 Residents spend the vast majority of
their time involved with patient care.
Surgical specialties In these activities they act as medical
Men (n = 29) 93 39 63 experts and clinical decision makers for
Women (n = 26) 89 52 52 their patients, they deal with the doc-
tor–patient relationship, and they con-
Total
stantly deal with ethical issues. The im-
Men (n = 126) 93 47 41
Women (n = 128) 94 53 46
portance of personal qualities is much
in evidence as they communicate with
*Percentages shown represent the residents’ first and second choices combined.
families, health care team members,
other medical and paramedical profes-
sionals. The 15 most commonly listed
attributes of professionalism we found
The mean rating by residents in all ical organization most concerned with all relate to one of these categories. For
programs for the adequacy of the quan- professionalism (i.e., either the Collège example, the attributes of competence,
tity of teaching about professionalism des médecins du Québec or the College up-to-date medical knowledge, good
was 4.13 (SD ⫾ 1.44). The mean rating of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta). clinical judgment, and good organiza-
for the quality of the teaching about tion all relate to residents’ activities as
professionalism was 3.79 (SD ⫾ 1.44). DISCUSSION medical experts and clinical decision
Multiple regression analysis of these makers. Further, the attributes of re-
data showed statistically significant dif- In this study, we wanted to determine spect, empathy, confidentiality, cour-
ferences of the responses by university the views of residents who were the tesy, and good communication are all
for both quantity and quality of teach- closest to completing their program, so related to the doctor–patient relation-
ing, with these factors explaining 8.8% we sampled the opinions of senior resi- ship; the attributes of honesty and in-
and 6.8% of the variance, respectively. dents only. This still led to a consider- tegrity, responsibility, collegiality, self-
The most commonly selected sugges- able range in the number of years train- appraisal, and calm are related to
tions for learning more about profes- ees had actually been residents (most personal qualities; and non-medical is-
sionalism were better examples of family medicine residents were in their sues that figure in the complex decision
teachers as role models (30%, n = 61); second and last year of their program, making that is a common part of man-
discussion with peers, teachers, and pa- whereas the specialty and subspecialty agement of patients today, especially in
tients (23%, n = 47); workshops and residents were all at least in the third the inpatient setting, are related to eth-
seminars (19%, n = 40); and formal year of their training). However, despite ical issues. The larger view of profes-
teaching (19%, n = 39). The mean of differences in years of training, the res- sionalism, which includes the social
the residents’ ratings of their comfort in idents in family medicine listed the vision of medicine (i.e., altruism, im-
explaining what professionalism is to a same attributes in their top three portance of the social contract, serving
more junior resident was 4.86 (SD ⫾ choices (competence, respect, and em- the needs of patients and society before
1.32). A total of 56% of the residents pathy) as did the residents in the spe- one’s own, speaking out on behalf of is-
correctly identified the Canadian med- cialties, which suggests that the year of sues within the community), self-gov-

736 ACADEMIC MEDICINE, VOL. 76, NO. 7 / JULY 2001

ernance, and codes of ethics, seemed to basic differences between the two fac- sponded were similar in make-up to the
be less appreciated by the residents. ulties of medicine. overall groups of residents sampled in
In a recent editorial,11 commenting Two interpretations can be derived terms of age, sex, and distribution
on an article describing residents’ from our study’s results. One view is within the different programs (family
choices of attributes of excellent at- that residents have a very incomplete medicine, medical specialties, and sur-
tending-physician role models,12 the re- knowledge of what professionalism is, gical specialties).
lationship between the choices resi- while the other is that residents are de- Further research is needed to deter-
dents made and their daily work was veloping their knowledge of profession- mine teachers’ perceptions of profes-
also noted. The editorial stated that alism in terms of what they actually do sionalism in medicine and their pre-
since residents spend the majority of and that, although limited in scope, ferred ways of teaching and learning
their time caring for patients and teach- their knowledge is quite good. The lat- about it, and the teachers’ and resi-
ing, it was likely that they would focus ter view, which is the one we favor, dents’ perceptions of the social vision of
on the teachers’ behaviors that had the holds that what one needs to know medicine.
greatest congruence with their daily about professionalism will change and
work. It would also be understandable needs to be continually upgraded and This research was supported by a grant from the
refined throughout the physician’s prac- Association of Canadian Medical Colleges/Med-
that they would model themselves on ical Research Council Committee on Research in
physicians whose careers focused on pa- tice life. This means the topic of pro- Medical Education. The authors gratefully ac-
tient care and teaching. fessionalism needs to be high on the list knowledge the valuable comments made by Ms.
The importance of role models for of topics for life-long learning for phy- Jocelyn Lockyer during the final stages of the
residents to learn about professionalism sicians. So, just as physicians will find writing of the manuscript.
is reflected in the overwhelming num- that they must upgrade their knowledge
ber of residents who selected contact because of advances in science as well REFERENCES
with positive role models (first choice as changes in practice focus, similarly,
by 93.5% of all residents) and contact they will need to continually upgrade 1. Reynolds EP. Reaffirming professionalism
their knowledge and skills related to through the education community. Ann In-
with negative role models (third choice tern Med. 1994;120:609–14.
by 43.5% of all residents). Their second professionalism. The aim, then, for res-
2. Cruess RL, Cruess SR. Teaching medicine as
choice, selected by 50% of all respon- idency education programs on profes- a profession in the service of healing. Acad
dents, was contact with patients and sionalism should not be to try to teach Med. 1997;72:941–52.
their next-of-kin. All three of these the trainee everything during residency. 3. Wear D. Professional development of medical
choices reveal the importance of learn- Instead, the aim should be to instill the students: problems and promises. Acad Med.
basic principles and develop the atti- 1997;72:1056–62.
ing through contact with others, and 4. Hensel WA, Dickey NW. Teaching profes-
tude that professionalism is of great im-
again, support the validity of classifying sionalism: passing the torch. Acad Med.
portance to the physician at every stage 1998;73:865–70.
the attributes and learning about them
of his or her practice life and that it 5. Relman AS. Education to defend professional
in terms of the daily working life of the
needs to be tied to life-long learning. values in the new corporate age. Acad Med.
trainee.
Individual residency programs will 1998;73:1229–33.
The fact that almost half of the res- 6. Ludmerer KM. Instilling professionalism in
have to decide on the topics they plan
idents (46%) did not correctly identify to focus on in any educational interven- medical education. JAMA. 1999;282:881–2.
the provincial licensing body as the Ca- tions. Our findings and the detailed list
7. Swick HM, Szenas P, Danoff D, Whitcomb
nadian medical organization most con- ME. Teaching professionalism in undergrad-
of proposed topics for instruction about uate medical education. JAMA. 1999;282:
cerned with professionalism again professionalism that was published re- 830–2.
points to the fact that residents are less cently2 could serve as the starting point 8. Dillman DA. Mail and telephone surveys: the
knowledgeable about those aspects of for making such decisions. total design method. New York: John Wiley
professionalism that do not relate to Although our response rate of 48.4% and Sons, 1978.
their current daily activities. 9. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data
may be considered somewhat low, we Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Pub-
Multiple regression analysis of the believe that our results are generalizable lications. 1994.
data regarding adequacy of quantity and because (1) there were a large number 10. Stern DT. Assessing professional values. Acad
quality of teaching about professional- of responders in total (258), (2) the re- Med. 1996;71(suppl 10):S37–S39.
ism showed statistically significant dif- sponders came from two faculties of 11. Skeff KM, Mutha A. Role models—guiding
ferences in the responses by university medicine that are geographically sepa- the future of medicine. N Engl J Med. 1998;
339:2015–7.
for both. However, because these factors rated by over 4,000 km and in very 12. Wright SM, Kern DE, Kolodner K, Howard
explained only 8.8% and 6.8% of the different parts of Canada (one English- DM, Brancati FL. Attributes of excellent at-
variance, we felt the differences were speaking and the other French-speak- tending-physician role models. N Engl J Med.
unlikely to be meaningful in terms of ing), and (3) the individuals who re- 1998;339:1986–93.

ACADEMIC MEDICINE, VOL. 76, NO. 7 / JULY 2001 737