Unit 11 Sas
Unit 11 Sas
Unit 11 Sas
Unit
Introduction to Design
Philosophies for RC Structures
Building flyover
Gravity load
Slab
rif:
CoBurnn
Beam
Footing
Fig, 1.1.2
Concrete is weak in ternsion and its ultimate tension strength is very low as
compare to compressive strength.
Tensile strength is greatly affects the width of crack in structure.
Advantages :
(i) Due toplastic hinge concept, redistribution of internal forces is accounted.
(iü) Itallows varied selection of loadfactors.
Limitations :
(1) Limitation on deflection and also it does not guarantee other serviceability
imits like instability and fatigue.
() This method is more comprehensive method to take care of strength.
(ii) It does notguarantee of serviceability performance.
1.4.3 Limit State Method:
serviceability
The limit state methodensures the safety at ultimate load and
use.
at working load making the structure fit for its indeed
Features:
during the entire loading
(i) It considers the actual behaviour of the structure
uptothe collapse.
(i) The method is based on statistical probabilistic principles.
(i) It defines quantitatively the margin of safety.
1.5 Types of Limit States :
i
Strucure -I (SU) 1-11 Intro, to Design Phlosophles for RC
P Design of Concrete Structuree
Characteristics
strength
1.845
ean strÙngth
density
Frequeny fck= frm1.645
5% Rsults
belo fck
fck fm
Strength ’
Fig, 1.6.1 :Frequency Dist. Curve for strength
densíty
Frequency tk= fm + t.845
5 % Results
below tk
fm
Load
Fig, 1.6.2: Frequency dist, Curve for load
Fa
F
Partial safety for loads dependsupon
(1) Nature by loads or their combination
(iü) type of limit state
IS456 : 2000 recommends the use of partial safety factors for loads (Y) as
shown in Table 1.7.1(a)
Table 1.7.1(a) : Partial safety factors (Y) for loads table 18 of IS456 : 2000
f
material
IS456 : 2000 recommends the use of partial safety factors for
strengths (Ym) as shown in Table 1.7.1(b).
Table 1.7.1(b) : Partial safety factors for material strength (y)
LnitState
Golla1seefiectio LOcal:dàmage