IIRP - IIIPI Best Practices
IIRP - IIIPI Best Practices
IIRP - IIIPI Best Practices
Study By
Indian Institute of Insolvency Professionals of ICAI (IIIPI)
Best Practices
on Individual Insolvency under IBC, 2016
(with Reference to PG to CD)
Study By
Published By:
Indian Institute of Insolvency Professionals of ICAI (IIIPI)
ICAI Bhawan, P. O. Box No. 7100, Indraprastha Marg, New Delhi - 110002
Website : www.iiipicai.in
Printed By:
Perfact Impression Pvt. Ltd.,
49/72, Sahibabad Industrial Area, Site-IV, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh - 201010
Email: iiipi.pub@icai.in
Disclaimer:
The views and opinions expressed or implied in this report are those of professional members
and do not necessarily reflect those of IIIPI. IIIPI is not in any way responsible for the result of
any action taken on the basis of views and opinions expressed herein. Material in this report
shall not be reproduced, whether in part or in whole, without the written consent of IIIPI.
Foreword
The Indian Institute of Insolvency Professionals of ICAI (IIIPI) is pleased to present
the report on Best Practices on Individual Insolvency (with Reference to PG to CD)
under IBC 2016 prepared by the Study Group constituted by IIIPI in this regard.
This publication was released by Sh. Ravi Mital, Chairperson, IBBI on the occasion
of 6th Annual Day Program organized by the IIIPI on 25th November 2022.
The purpose of this publication is to provide guidance to IPs while discharging their
roles and responsibilities in respect of individual insolvency resolution process and
be market-ready before the full-fledged individual insolvency framework comes on
stream. The guidance in this document is based on best practices, nationally and
internationally, and are directory in nature. We hope that these guidelines will help
the IPs in execution of their responsibilities in the context of individual insolvency
resolution process, transparently and independently within the scope of law and
regulations as envisaged under IBC.
I sincerely appreciate and thank CA. G. Ramaswamy, IP for steering the Study
Group and providing his valuable guidance, along with members of the group who
all worked hard to prepare the draft report.
I also appreciate the efforts put in by CA. Rahul Madan, Managing Director, and
the Research Department of IIIPI for providing their technical and administrative
support in bringing out this publication.
Further, after gaining more experience, this Background Guidance Note shall be
reviewed from time to time. I am sure that the professional members of IIIPI and
other stakeholders of IBC will find this publication immensely helpful.
The Study Group was given a mandate to deliberate and recommend on best practices
to be followed by IPs while carrying out their responsibilities in connection with
Individual Insolvency Process (with reference to PG to CD) within the framework of
IBC. The study group, consisting of members having rich experience in in managing
insolvency and bankruptcy, has attempted to develop a comprehensive document
on the subject after wider consultation intra-group and with other stakeholders.
This report has been created with the objective of furthering transparency and
equipping the IPs to execute their roles and responsibilities with respect to individual
insolvency, more effectively. This report shall provide a framework to IPs on
matters like identifying the common and divergent practices in Individual insolvency
as compared with CIRP, grey areas and best practices across the resolution and
bankruptcy process, effective coordination, and jurisdiction between connected
CIRP and Individual Insolvency resolution, etc.
The study group is thankful to Dr. Ashok Haldia, Chairman, IIIPI for providing an
opportunity to develop the knowhow as above and providing his insights. The group
is particularly thankful to CA..M. Suresh Kumar, IP for his efforts in creating the
initial draft of the report. In addition, the group expresses gratitude to several other
professionals including experienced IPs, legal experts and other professionals who
have contributed directly and indirectly to the development of this report on ‘Best
Practices on Individual Insolvency (with reference to PG to CD) under IBC’.
CA G. Ramaswamy, IP (Chairman)
1. Abbreviations 1
2. Background 3
3. Legal Provisions 5
12. Role of RP’s During Repayment Plan & Meeting Creditors for the
Approval/Consideration of the Repayment Plan 36
15. Appendices 59
AA Adjudicating Authority
CD Corporate Debtor
HC High Court
IP Insolvency Professional
PG Personal Guarantor
RP Resolution Professional
SC Supreme Court
Over last five years, since inception of IBC, jurisprudence has evolved and is still
evolving as a significant economic legislation for reorganizing and resolving distressed
businesses. IBC, as an effective deterrent, has successfully altered the behaviour of
lenders and borrowers.
After the prepack insolvency framework recently introduced, it is expected that individual
insolvency framework in its full-fledged form may become reality soon in India, after the
framework for personal guarantors to CDs, was made effective from Dec, 2019. In fact,
framework of such Individual Insolvency including partnership firms, is touted to be next
big thing, for Indian IBC regime.
The momentum of PG to CD framework was halted due to various writ petitions in High
Courts. Finally, Hon’ble SC judgement came in the case of SBI Vs. Anil D. Ambani
in May’2021, which settled jurisprudence in respect of constitutional validity of the
framework for PG to CD and clarifying some of the other aspects.
PG to CD framework has been in vogue for over two years now. Over 650 cases have
been initiated. There are many dissimilarities, complexities and legal interpretations of
provisions, in PG to CD cases as compared with CIRP and hence the need to develop
a best practice document for guidance of IPs. The best practice document as proposed
shall also help professionals and stakeholders, prepare in advance and be market-
ready before the full individual insolvency framework comes on stream.
In view of above, IIIP-ICAI proposes to constitute a study group to develop the best
practice document on Individual Insolvency with specific reference to PG to CD
framework. Once the draft of this best practice document is prepared, IBBI and other
IPAs shall also be consulted before releasing the formal best practice document for the
benefit of all IPs.
Though the Study Group (in its first meeting) can deliberate on contents/structure of
study, our initial thoughts on likely structure/headings, for examining issues/grey-areas
and recommending best practices thereon, are as follows:
• CA G. Ramaswamy, IP (Chairman)
• CA. Durgesh Kabra, IP
• CA M. Suresh Kumar, IP
• CA P. K. Diwakar, IP
• CA. G. Gunasekaran, IP
• CA. N. Sivachalam, IP
• CA. S. Prabhu, IP
• CA. S. Kasi Viswanathan, IP
• CA. R. Raghavendran, IP
• CA R. Shanmuggam, IP
• CA N. Venkatesh, IP
• CA A.V. Arun, IP
• Ms. Anju Agarwal, IP
• CA R. Balachandran, IP
• CA Nipun Singhvi, IP
• CA KV Jain, IP
• CA Navneet Gupta, IP
• CA. Pradeep Kabra, IP
• CA. Pulkit Gupta. IP
The act enacted in 2016 has underwent robust changes in the last 5 years considering
the evolving jurisprudence in the corporate insolvency. The individual insolvency is just
started in limited way, which needs to undergo many vagaries in the coming days. To
start with, lets understand the brief structure of the code:
Rules
Regulations
(2) Without prejudice to sub-section (1) and notwithstanding anything to the contrary
contained in this Code, where a corporate insolvency resolution process or liquidation
proceeding of a corporate debtor is pending before a National Company Law Tribunal,
an application relating to the insolvency resolution or liquidation or bankruptcy of a
corporate guarantor or personal guarantor, as the case may be, of such corporate
debtor shall be filed before such National Company Law Tribunal.
(4) The National Company Law Tribunal shall be vested with all the powers of the
Debt Recovery Tribunal as contemplated under Part III of this Code for the purpose
of sub-section (2).
* Note: Refer - State Bank of India, SAMB v. Mahendra Kumar Jajodia judgement [(2022) ibclaw.in 89 NCLAT
– Appeal against this order before SC was dismissed)
Bankruptcy Process:
Guarantee:
Mere omission of sign on the agreement cannot absolve him from his liability as the
guarantor:
Invalid Guarantees:
Surety Liability:
Section 128 [ICA]- Surety’s The liability of the surety is co- extensive with that of
liability the principal debtor, unless it is otherwise provided by
the contract.
Maharashtra State The fact that the company which is the principal debtor
Electricity Board [2017] – has gone into liquidation would not have any effect on
Supreme Court the liability of the guarantor.
Discharge of Surety:
Section 133 [ICA]- Any variance, made without the surety‟s consent, in the
Discharge of surety by terms of the contract between the principal debtor and
variance in terms of contract the creditor, discharges the surety as to transactions
subsequent to the variance
Section 134 [ICA]- The surety is discharged by any contract between
Discharge of surety by the creditor and the principal debtor, by which the
release or discharge of principal debtor is released, or by any act or omission
principal debtor of the creditor, the legal consequence of which is the
discharge of the principal debtor.
Section 135 [ICA]- A contract between the creditor and the principal
Discharge of surety when debtor, by which the creditor makes a composition with,
creditor compounds with, or promises to give time to, or not to sue, the principal
gives time to, or agrees not debtor, discharges the surety, unless the surety assents
to sue, principal debtor to such contract.
Section 136 [ICA]- Surety Where a contract to give time to the principal debtor is
not discharged when made by the creditor with a third person, and not with
agreement made with the principal debtor, the surety is not discharged.
third person to give time to
principal debtor
Section 137 [ICA]- Creditor’s Mere forbearance on the part of the creditor to sue the
forbearance to sue does not principal debtor or to enforce any other remedy against
discharge surety him does not, in the absence of any provision in the
guarantee to the contrary, discharge the surety.
Section 138 [ICA]- Release Where there are co-sureties, a release by the creditor
of one co-surety does not of one of them does not discharge the others; neither
discharge others does it free the surety so released from his responsibility
to the other sureties
Section 139 [ICA]- If the creditor does any act which is inconsistent with
Discharge of surety by the rights of the surety, or omits to do any act which his
creditor’s act or omission duty to the surety requires him to do, and the eventual
impairing surety’s eventual remedy of the surety himself against the principal
remedy debtor is thereby impaired, the surety is discharged.
Ravi Ajit Kulkarni Section 95, read with sections 96 and 99, of the Insolvency
and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 read with rules 11 and 44 of the
v. National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016
State Bank of India Individual/firm’s insolvency resolution process - Application
by creditor:
[2021] 130 taxmann.
com 442 (NCL-AT) Whether once application under section 95 is filed,
Adjudicating Authority has to act on it, and following principle
of natural justice, it has to give limited notice to debtor/
personal guarantor - Held, yes
Whether limited notice has to be only to secure presence of
debtor/personal guarantor referring to Interim Moratorium
which has commenced so that when Resolution Professional
is appointed, they may provide material in their favour as per
section 99(2) - Held, yes
Whether before appointment of Resolution Professional,
debtor is not allowed to raise disputes, however, if debtor
raises dispute on merit, same may be adjudicated only after
receipt of report from Resolution Professional under section
99 - Held, yes
Whether stage for considering default arrives when matter is
taken up under section 100 - Held, yes
Babu A. Dhammanagi Section 95, read with section 97 and 100, of the Insolvency
and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
v.
Individual/firm’s insolvency resolution process - Application
Union of India by creditor
Ref1: Whether insolvency proceedings initiated against personal
guarantor under Code is a time bound process and aforesaid
[2022] 138 taxmann. procedure contains filing of application under section 95
com 406 (Karnataka) for appointment of Resolution Professional by Adjudicating
Authority under section 99, submission of report by
Ref2: Resolution Professional under section 99, recording reasons
(2022) ibclaw.in 81 for recommending request for acceptance or rejection of
HC application and finally admission or rejection of application by
Adjudicating Authority - Held, yes
Rohit Nath @ Rohit Section 95, read with section 94 of the Insolvency and
Rabindranath Bankruptcy Code, 2016
---
The major differences between the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process and the
Individual Insolvency Resolution Process are summarized as under:
The major differences between the Corporate Liquidation and the Individual Bankruptcy
are summarized as under:
95 - Application by creditor
to initiate insolvency
resolution process.
1. A creditor may apply either • Copy of the demand notice • Same as stated • Same as stated
by himself, or jointly with served by the Creditor in above in Sec 94 above in Sec 94
other creditors, or through Form B [Rule 7(1)] to the
a resolution professional to Debtor
the Adjudicating Authority
• All other roles as defiled
for initiating an insolvency
above for Sec 94 related
resolution process under
checks
this section by submitting an
application.
2. A creditor may apply under
sub-section (1) in relation
to any partnership debt
owed to him for initiating
an insolvency resolution
process against—
(a) any one or more partners
of the firm; or
(b) the firm.
3. Where an application
has been made against
one partner in a firm, any
other application against
another partner in the same
firm shall be presented
in or transferred to the
Adjudicating Authority in
which the first mentioned
application is pending for
adjudication and such
Adjudicating Authority
may give such directions
for consolidating the
proceedings under the
applications as it thinks just.
4. An application under
sub-section (1) shall be
accompanied with details
and documents relating to—
(a) the debts owed by the
debtor to the creditor or
creditors submitting the
application for insolvency
resolution process as on
the date of application;
(b) the failure by the debtor
to pay the debt within a
period of fourteen days of
the service of the notice
of demand; and
(c) relevant evidence of such
default or non-repayment
of debt.
5. The creditor shall also
provide a copy of the
application made under sub-
section (1) to the debtor.
6. The application referred to
in sub-section (1) shall be in
such form and manner and
accompanied by such fee as
may be prescribed.
7. The details and documents
required to be submitted
under sub-section (4)
shall be such as may be
specified.
96 - Interim-moratorium
1. When an application is filed • Optional Roles [not • In the initial • The RP who has
under section 94 or section mandatory] days, the lack of already signed
95— knowledge about the Form A
• List down all the debts
the individual [application] can
(a) an interim-moratorium and creditors to whom this
insolvency and guide the Debtor
shall commence on the moratorium applies and
the moratorium to send in the fact
date of the application the RP can communicate
are likely to of PG form filing to
in relation to all the with them regarding the
cause lot of all the concerned
debts and shall cease to filing of PG application
misunderstanding authorities at the
have effect on the date and update them about
in the credit earliest, so that
of admission of such the interim-moratorium
market, wherein the authorities are
application; and in force. Even a copy
they will continue appraised of the
of the application filing
(b) during the interim- with the legal fact of filing of the
acknowledgement be
moratorium period— cases…. PG-IRP petition.
shared with them for their
(i) any legal action records, which will prevent • The Debtors may
or proceeding unwanted notices and file some bogus
pending in respect continuation of litigations. / incomplete
of any debt shall applications to
• RP can intimate the
be deemed to have delay the legal
respective courts, where
been stayed; and cases of the
the matters are pending
(ii) the creditors of creditors.
the debtor shall • Although
not initiate any proceedings
legal action or words are there,
proceedings in the government
respect of any debt. authorities are
2. Where the application has likely to continue
been made in relation to a their regular
firm, the interim-moratorium assessment
under sub-section (1) shall proceedings [IT,
operate against all the GST, PF, ESI
partners of the firm as on the etc.,] and pass
date of the application. orders during the
moratorium.
3. The provisions of sub-
section (1) shall not apply
to such transactions as may
be notified by the Central
Government in consultation
with any financial sector
regulator.
97 - Appointment of
resolution professional.
1. If the application under • If another RP name is • The time RP • Keep track of all
section 94 or 95 is filed suggested by IBBI, upon signed the form your consents
through a resolution receipt of appointment and the time given for CIRP /
professional, the of order from NCLT, RP the matter is PG cases.
Adjudicating Authority shall should submit his consent listed and RP
direct the Board within form to the NCLT report is appointed
seven days of the date of appropriate Form as and may differ from
the application to confirm when notified to IBBI / few days to few
that there are no disciplinary IIIPICAI [currently IP-1 months depending
proceedings pending against forms are notified only for upon the workload
resolution professional. CIRP process] of the NCLT
and the legal
jurisprudence.
2. The Board shall within • The RP shall contact / • The time • Incase if you are
seven days of receipt of write to the concerned estimates of overloaded and
directions under sub-section Debtor / applicant for the RP may go can’t take any
(1) communicate to the obtaining copy of the haywire due to more new cases,
Adjudicating Authority in application, so that he can delays in judiciary. file a memo /
writing either— start the review and report request before
• IBBI has
preparation work. AA seeking not
(a) confirming the replaced the
to appoint you in
appointment of the • The RP shall initiate recommendation
delayed cases
resolution professional; collection of various data with a 6 month
[because after
or about the PG debtor from empanelment
appointment
all the market sources list. At present
(b) rejecting the appointment asking for change
available, inorder to speed scenarios, due
of the resolution by the RP will not
up the process timeline. to AFA expiry /
professional and go well before AA]
renewal issues,
nominating another
one can get
resolution professional
enlisted for only
for the insolvency
one term in the
resolution process.
list in a year.
3. Where an application under
section 94 or 95 is filed by
the debtor or the creditor
himself, as the case may
be, and not through the
resolution professional,
the Adjudicating Authority
shall direct the Board,
within seven days of the
filing of such application,
to nominate a resolution
professional for the
insolvency resolution
process.
4. The Board shall nominate
a resolution professional
within ten days of receiving
the direction issued by the
Adjudicating Authority under
sub-section (3).
5. The Adjudicating Authority
shall by order appoint the
resolution professional
recommended under sub-
section (2) or as nominated
by the Board under sub-
section (4).
6. A resolution professional
appointed by the
Adjudicating Authority
under sub-section (5) shall
be provided a copy of the
application for insolvency
resolution process.
98 - Replacement of
resolution professional.
1. Where the debtor or the • Submit appropriate • The lack of proper • Maintaining a
creditor is of the opinion that consent form [Form A] documentation detailed daily
the resolution professional and handover by report of the facts,
• If the RP change matter is
appointed under section 97 the erstwhile RP actions taken in
discussed in the creditors
is required to be replaced, cause extreme the PG insolvency
meeting, the existing RP
he may apply to the difficulties for new case will facilitate
shall ensure to minitize the
Adjudicating Authority for RP to pursue the a proper handover
detailed discussion and
the replacement of the such case. and also
consider the resolution
resolution professional. preparation of
among the creditors. • The inordinate
progress reports
2. The Adjudicating Authority Incase of the existing RP delays of the
as and when
shall within seven days is not in support of such Adjudicating
needed.
of the receipt of the change for any specific authority in
application under sub- reason, the RP shall hearing and
section (1) make a inform the creidtors and deciding the new
reference to the Board document the same in the RP appointment
for replacement of the minutes, for appropriate matters will
resolution professional. consideration of the NCLT hinder the flow
during adjudication of the of the resolution
3. The Board shall, within
change over request. Process.
ten days of the receipt
of a reference from the • Existing RP shall prepare
Adjudicating Authority a comprehensive list of
under sub-section (2), handover documents, as
recommend the name of the may be application under
resolution professional to various provisions of the
the Adjudicating Authority act, rules and regulations
against whom no disciplinary and take a proper
proceedings are pending. acknowledgement of the
handover from the new RP
4. Without prejudice to the
provisions contained • The RP shall ensure to
in sub-section (1), the retail such hard copy / soft
creditors may apply to copy of all the data as may
the Adjudicating Authority be prescribed by the IBBI
for replacement of the as per the preservation of
resolution professional records regulations.
where it has been decided in
• As far as possible, the
the meeting of the creditors,
existing RP shall make a
to replace the resolution
detailed day-wise progress
professional with a new
of the case, minutes of
resolution professional
all discussion in a very
for implementation of the
detailed report and provide
repayment plan.
the same to the new RP,
5. Where the Adjudicating so that the entire facts are
Authority admits an appraised to the new RP
application made under for further success of the
sub-section (1) or sub- IRP process
section (4), it shall direct
the Board to confirm that
there are no disciplinary
proceedings pending against
the proposed resolution
professional.
(b) evidence of encashment • RP shall carry out such • The Debtor may • As much as
of a cheque issued by due-diligence check to not extend his possible, RP shall
the debtor; or validate the existence co-operation ensure to submit
(c) a signed acknowledgment and title of all the assets and furnish all the supporting
by the creditor accepting reported in the application, the information evidences and
receipt of dues. to establish appropriate [especially the reasoning
3. Where the debt for which an comfort before certifying incase of Sec for his opinion
application has been filed by the form 95- creditor filed in the report
a creditor is registered with cases]. Without with all required
• RP shall carry out discrete
the information utility, the Debtor co- annexures. RP
enquiry and verification
debtor shall not be entitled operation, report need not worry
of various assets of the
to dispute the validity of preparation will about bulkiness of
Debtor, to ascertain any
such debt. be very tough and the report. It can
intentional or unintentional
4. For the purposes of likely chance of have a synopsis
missout of the asset or
examining an application, many missouts for faster perusal
liability
the resolution professional of AA. However,
• The statutory
may seek such further • Wherever needed, RP RP shall ensure
authorities are
information or explanation can take appropriate that the report is
likely to take
in connection with the legal opinions on the comprehensive
longer time
application as may be contracts, so as to arrive to defend any
to furnish the
required from the debtor at a proper conclusion objections.
information, as
or the creditor or any and recommend to the
the nodal officers
other person who, in the Adjudicating Authority for
are not yet in
opinion of the resolution acceptance / rejection of
place to facilitate
professional, may provide the application
such information
such information.
• RP shall formally minutize sharing.
5. The person from whom all the discussion with the
information or explanation is Debtors, Creditors and
sought under sub-section (4) all other stakeholders
shall furnish such information and ensure proper
or explanation within seven documentation and
days of receipt of the request. preservation of the same,
6. The resolution professional as the AA may call for any
shall examine the application evidence for forming such
and ascertain that— an opinion of acceptance /
(a) the application satisfies rejection.
the requirements set out
in section 94 or 95;
(b) the applicant has provided
information and given
explanation sought by the
resolution professional
under sub-section (4).
7. After examination of the
application under sub-section
(6), he may recommend
acceptance or rejection of the
application in his report.
8. Where the resolution
professional finds that
the debtor is eligible
for a fresh start under
Chapter II, the resolution
professional shall submit
a report recommending
that the application by the
debtor under section 94 be
treated as an application
under section 81 by the
Adjudicating Authority.
1. The Adjudicating Authority • An RP shall monitor the • Wherever the RP • RP shall keep
shall, within fourteen days progress of the case and is appointed by monitoring the
from the date of submission provide such assistance to the NCLT from progress of the
of the report under section 99 the AA for final orders, as the empanelment case and assist
pass an order either admitting may be called upon by the list, there is lot AA with additional
or rejecting the application AA during the course of the of uncertainty in details as and
referred to in section 94 or 95, hearing fees and expense when called for
as the case may be. realization for the by the AA during
• Incase AA directs for RP. the application
2. Where the Adjudicating negotiation, RP shall adjudication
Authority admits an ensure free and fair • The timeline delay process.
application under sub-section negotiation between debtor in application
(1), it may, on the request of and all the creditors as admission leaves
the resolution professional, the case may be. RP shall the RP in lurch,
issue instructions for the analyse and facilitate the as he can’t plan
purpose of conducting negotiation process with his work timelines
negotiations between the ground realities of the law, and commit for
debtor and creditors and for money realizable, potential taking other
arriving at a repayment plan. risk of litigation delays assignments
3. The Adjudicating Authority etc., and facilitate for a
shall provide a copy of negotiation / compromise
the order passed under arrangement.
sub-section (1) along with • RP shall ensure that
the report of the resolution the copies of the order
professional and the are received by all the
application referred to in respective parties in time.
section 94 or 95, as the case Wherever there are miss
may be, to the creditors out in communication, RP
within seven days from the shall ensure that such
date of the said order. communication are sent
4. If the application referred to from his desk to ensure
in section 94 or 95, as the smooth flow of insolvency
case may be, is rejected by process.
the Adjudicating Authority on
the basis of report submitted
by the resolution professional
that the application was made
with the intention to defraud
his creditors or the resolution
professional, the order under
sub-section (1) shall record
that the creditor is entitled
to file for a bankruptcy order
under Chapter IV.
101: Moratorium.
103 - Registering of
claims by creditors.
1. The creditors shall • The RP shall • The claims won’t be received • RP shall prepare
register claims define a details in time. There will be lot of and maintain
with the resolution process for receipt belated claims OR some clear work papers
professional by sending and verification cases claims may come after for each claims
details of the claims of claims [Form finalization of the repayment received and
by way of electronic B] in their office plan. verified. The
communications or covering receipt work papers are
• Some of the claims may be
through courier, speed of claim by the most crucial
time barred may be 5/10
post or registered letter. various modes, documents
years old. Whether the RP
acknowledging to evidence
2. In addition to the claims has power to reject those
those claims, proper review
referred to in sub-section claims on the grounds
preliminary and admission /
(1) , the creditor shall to limitation of time is an
review, calling for rejection of claims.
provide to the resolution unanswered question. Even
additional details,
professional, personal the AA has not clarified such
final review and
information and such issues in the CIRP cases.
acceptance /
particulars as may be
rejection of claim,
prescribed.
communication
to the said
claimant regarding
acceptance /
rejection etc.,
• As the law
specifies a
maximum
threshold of days
for verification of
claims, RP shall
ensure proper
review and claim
admissions within
the stipulated
time, so that the
process timelines
are adhered to.
• Wherever there
are ambiguity
in amounts or
the claim is not
fully crystallised,
the RP shall
ensure proper
documentation
with reasoning
for admitting the
claim with best
estimates and
shall periodically
review such claims
with the additional
information /
evidence received
due course.
(c) there is a necessity • To submit his report along • To establish the (c) associates;
of summoning with Repayment Plan to the reasonableness (d) excluded
a meeting of Adjudicating Authority within of the reasonable assets;
the creditors, specified time period. expenses as per
if required, to Reg. 17(1)(c) of (e) reasonable
• Resolution Professional expenses to
consider the IBBI (Insolvency
to ensure that his report determine
repayment plan: Resolution Process
includes and covers items minimum
of Personal budget.
Provided that mentioned in Section 106(2)
Guarantor to
where the of the Insolvency and • Appointment of
Corporate Debtors)
resolution Bankruptcy Code, 2016. detective agency to
Regulations, 2019.
professional trace the assets of the
• To ensure the priority of
recommends • To adhere to personal guarantor.
payment of debts as per
that a meeting of the prescribed
Section 178 of IB Code, • Draft repayment plan
the creditors is timelines as there
2016. may be discussed
not required to may be lack of
be summoned, • Valuation of the assets in cooperation from with various
reasons for the case personal guarantor the personal stakeholders for their
same shall be proposed to make the guarantor. inputs/ suggestions
provided. payment by realisation from before finalisation.
sale of his/ her assets. • To enquire about the
3. The report referred to
in sub-section (2) shall standard of living of
also specify the date personal guarantor
on which, and the time with the neibours/
and place at which, relatives/ friends/
the meeting should else in order to justify
be held if he is of the he minimum budget
opinion that a meeting proposed by the
of the creditors should personal guarantor in
be summoned. the Repayment Plan
as per Reg. 17(1)(c)
4. For the purposes of of IBBI (Insolvency
sub-section (3) - Resolution Process
5. the date on which the for Personal
meeting is to be held Guarantor to the
shall be not less than Corporate Debtors)
fourteen days and not Regulations, 2019.
more than twenty-eight • To obtain undertaking
days from the date of for reasonable
submission of report assurance in case
under subsection (1); personal guarantor
6. the resolution proposed to bring
professional shall funds for the purpose
consider the of repayment
convenience of plan from external
creditors in fixing the sources.
date and venue of • To appoint valuer for
the meeting of the valuation of assets
creditors. in case personal
guarantor proposes to
bring funds by sale of
assets.
107. Summoning of
meeting of creditors.
1. The resolution • To verify the claims received • To determine claim • RP may serve notice
professional shall and preparation of list of amount to be of meeting through
issue a notice calling creditors accordingly. admitted in case various modes of
the meeting of the of Resolution Plan communication
• To prepare the sheet
creditors at least of CD is pending i.e., electronically
representing the voting share
fourteen days before for approval before (Email, WhatsApp),
of each creditor as per the
the date fixed for such Adjudicating R.P.A.D./ Courier,
admitted claim amount.
meeting. Authority or etc.
• To issue a notice calling the distribution of funds
2. The resolution • It is advisable to
meeting of creditors at least under Liquidation is
professional shall have a meeting
14 days before the date of in process.
send the notice of the with creditors and
such meeting and send such
meeting to the list of • Coordination with record their inputs
notice to the creditors as
creditors prepared various creditors and suggestions on
per list of creditors prepared
under section 104. for seeking repayment plan.
under section 104 of the
information/
3. The notice sent under Insolvency and Bankruptcy • Venue for meeting
documents
sub-section (1) shall Code, 2016. may be decided
required for the
state the address as per the location
• Resolution Professional to purpose of claim
of the Adjudicating of largest no. of
ensure that the notice issued verification.
Authority to which the creditors.
under section 107(1) should
repayment plan and • To collate the
contain and be accompanied • To prepare notice
report of the resolution assets and
by such items as mentioned of the meeting
professional on the liabilities of
in section 107(3) of the with detailed
repayment plan has personal guarantor,
Insolvency and Bankruptcy agenda items to be
been submitted and excluded assets
Code, 2016 and Regulation discussed.
shall be accompanied and debts, Income
12 of IBBI (Insolvency
by - Tax Returns, Debt • The notice shall
Resolution Process for
owed by guarantor carry the necessary
(a) a copy of the Personal Guarantors
to his associates, agenda to be
repayment plan; to Corporate Debtors)
guarantees given discussed in the
Regulations, 2019.
(b) a copy of the in relation to meeting along
statement of affairs • The notice shall contain his debts, and with detailed notes
of the debtor; venue, time, date of the whether any of the to agenda with
meeting and option shall be guarantors is an documents required
(c) a copy of the
available to the participants associate of the to participants for
said report of
to attend the meeting either guarantor, details decision making
the resolution
in person, through video of business owned and draft resolutions
professional; and
conferencing or by electronic by the guarantor or wherever necessary
(d) forms for proxy mode/ proxy. of his firm in which for voting upon.
voting. he is a partner,
• The notice shall carry the
4. The proxy voting, necessary agenda to be as the case may
including electronic discussed in the meeting be or any other
proxy voting shall take along with detailed notes related information
place in such manner to agenda with documents required for
and form as may be related to it. preparation of
specified. statement of affairs.
• The notice shall contain
the Insolvency Resolution • There is no
Process Cost incurred by RP standard format
till the date of meeting. available for
preparation of
• Resolution Professional to statement of affairs.
ensure that proxy voting
and electronic proxy voting
shall be conducted as
per applicable rules and
regulations.
108. Conduct of
meeting of creditors.
111. Approval of
repayment plan by
creditors.
1. The resolution
professional shall
prepare a report of
the meeting of the
creditors on repayment
plan.
2. The report under
sub-section (1) shall
contain -
(a) whether the
repayment plan
was approved or
rejected and if
approved, the list
the modifications,
if any;
(b) the resolutions
which were
proposed at the
meeting and the
decision on such
resolutions;
(c) list of the creditors • To prepare a report of the • To adhere to • Report of the
who were present meeting of creditors on the timelines in meeting of creditors
or represented at repayment plan. preparation of the on repayment plan
the meeting, and • To ensure that the report report of meeting should be drafted
the voting records should contain: of creditors on in a proper manner
of each creditor for repayment plan. covering all the
(a) whether the repayment detailed discussion
all meetings of the
plan was approved or and decision
creditors; and
rejected and if approved, on proposed
(d) such other the list the modifications, resolution and
information as if any; approval/ rejection/
the resolution
(b) the resolutions which modification of the
professional thinks
were proposed at the repayment plan etc.
appropriate to
meeting and the decision
make known to
on such resolutions;
the Adjudicating
Authority. (c) list of the creditors
who were present or
represented at the
meeting, and the voting
records of each creditor
for all meetings of the
creditors; and
(d) such other information
as the resolution
professional thinks
appropriate to make
known to the Adjudicating
Authority.
113. Notice of
decisions taken at
meeting of creditors.
114. Order of
Adjudicating Authority
on repayment plan.
117. Completion of
repayment plan
118. Repayment
plan coming to end
prematurely
Unencumbered • For employment/ business/ vocation As are necessary for the purpose of his
Tools/books/ • For Eg., Apple laptop/desktop Whether employment/vocation. So,
Vehicles essential
• Validate, whether the listed out tools are
• High Cost business Softwares/Apps necessary for employment/business /
etc., vocation.
• Apple I Phone – Whether essential • If so, identify the nature and volume of
income generated in the past 3 years and
• Old Books of commercial /Antique value
the potential for generating income for
• Audi/Benz/BMW Car or Maruti Car next 3 years.
• Imported/ Hi Value Two wheelers • For Eg., Desktop/laptop used by
• Antiques professionals for professional drawing/with
specific professional application - can be
• Intellectual property Rights? exmpt.
• Royalty? • Otherwise, used for entertainment can not
be considered necessary.
• To be treated as Assets available for
distribution
• Intellectual property rights - Validate from
IPR Website -
• IBBI has to come out with guidance on the
NATURE and quantum of permitted tools
Unencumbered • For Satisfying basic needs of the family. • Basic Needs and Basic standard to be
Furniture/ specified by IBBI/Govt.
• Home Theatre/wi-fi enabled hi-tech
household devices • Antiques are different class and hence can
equipments not be left to the Defaulted Individual.
• Cozy Sofa/bed, Jacuzzi, Other posh
devices • Antiques are taken over and to be treated
as available for distribution.
• Antiques display
• Similarly Jacuzzi/Cozy bed etc.,
Personal • Mangal sutra over more than 10 • 79(14)(c) states “as may be prescribed”.
ornaments of Soverigns
• Once the Govt/IBBI prescribes the
such value, • Other attached ornaments with Mangal minimum weightages, then the difference
which cannot Sutra which they claim as part of can be taken over. It is now prescribed
be parted with, mangal sutraHigh Cost ornaments that up to Rs.1 lakh (Rule 5)
as per religious worn regularly, claimed to be part of the
usage.. • As per the religious requirements,
religious requirements
the additional ornaments have to be
evaluated.
• Help of “Registered Valuer” can be taken
Unencumbered • Single dwelling unit – means what? – • Definition of Single Dwelling unit to be
Single dwelling Flat with single bedroom validated – Now it is prescribed Rs. 10
unit lakhs in Rural Area and Rs. 20 lakhs in
• Multiple flats joined together as single
Urban area. (Rule 5)
flats
• Dwelling unit for Self and dependents to
be validated
• Specific size to be notified by IBBI
• In GST, there is a concept of “affordable
housing”. Whether the area as per
“affordable housing” can be a single
dwelling unit? Need Clarification from
authorities.
• Multiple flats joined together can not be
a single dwelling unit. However, official
clarification has to be issued by IBBI in this
regard
Court fine / • Whether penalty on the Civil Side/ • Official clarification on penalties of CD
Criminal Side devolved on the Individual / penalties on
penalty
cases against individual to be clarified
• Whether compoundable offence
• Whether Court fine/penalty levied on
• What is the priority
defaults of CD payable by director .. Eg.,
in PF, the personal liability attached to the
employer for failure of the CD, whether
covered
• Or Penalty/fine levied on Cases against
specific individual
• Where punishment like imprisonment
compounded by Financial penalty covered
Maintenance • Maintenance paid to parents, by custom • If not mandated by law then not excluded
to any person not by law debt
under any law • Maintenance paid to Disabled relative – • If mandated by contract, verify whether
in force not legally dependant contract is voidable on Insolvency/
bankruptcy
• Mandated by custom, not enforceable
Student loan • Student loan for self and dependant • Unless excluded specifically student loan
children cover both for self as well as dependant
children
• Student loan for sponsored children
• For sponsored children, not covered – can
be claimed along with regular debt.
• Parents living with the Individual, • No condition that the parents to live with
the individual
• Parents living with other siblings
• Parents not dependant – not covered
• Parents having own pension/source of
income • Parents under resolution plan and/or
bankruptcy also covered under Immediate
• Parents under Resolution plan
family. But parents’ debt not covered in
• Parents under bankruptcy this proceedings.
Unsecured Debt • Except - Secured Debt – What is • Security interest should have been created
secured debt – How to validate creation by any legal means like Charge, mortgage
of security interest- undocumented etc.,
security interest creation by word of
• Undocumented security interest by word of
mouth – possession of property without
mouth can not be validated.
evidence of having been given as
security • Possession given has to be redeemed.
4. Interim Moratorium
• Is it applicable even to the specifically • Sec. 96(1) (a) states in relation to “all
charged asset? Secured debts are not the debts” and (b) states proceedings in
qualifying debt. respect of “any debt”.
7. Exception in Assets:
• Creditor using foul languages to receive • Moratorium covers the activities of the
the money from the Individual Collection agency also
• Rights of the Individual for protection • RP is empowered to discipline the Creditor
or seek direction from the AA
• Individual has the right of protection. He
needs to apply to AA
9. Other Exceptions
APPENDIX – A
BEFORE THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
AT _________ – BENCH ___
CP/(IB)/……(…….)/…..
In the matter of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
And
……………............
……………............
……………............Applicant
Vs
……………............
……………............
……………............
……………............Respondent
Name : ………………………
Address ---------------------------------
Mobile ………………..
…………....…............
……………................
3. It is submitted that, the Application u/s 95 (1) of IBC, 2016 has been filed
by the Creditor and to submit the Report u/s 99 and I have examined the
application and ascertained the Satisfaction of requirements set out in Section
95 as under :
6. It is submitted that, in view of the reasons recorded in para 3,4 & 5 of this report,
I hereby recommend for the acceptance of the application No. CP(IB)/……
(…)/20… filed u/s 95(1) of the IBC 2016 by the Creditor …………. to initiate
Insolvency Resolution Process against Personal Guarantor ……………….
of the Corporate Debtor M/s …………… and the Adjudicating Authority may
appropriate order u/s 100 of IBC, 2016 for admission of the application.
Place: …………
Date: …………….
Resolution Professional
IBBI Reg.No._________________
APPENDIX - B
PUBLIC NOTICE
(Under Section 102 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board Code, 2016)
Relevant Particulars
1. Name of Personal Guarantor [PG]
2. Address of the registered office / principal office /
Residence of PG
3. Details of Order of Adjudicating Authority
4. Date of commencement of Insolvency Resolution Process
Notice is hereby given that the Adjudicating Authority [NCLT (____) / DRT (_______)]
has ordered the commencement of a insolvency resolution process of [name of PG] on
[insolvency commencement date] u/s 100.
The creditors of [name of the PG], are hereby called upon to submit their claims with
proof on or before [insert the date falling 21 days from the date of issue] to the resolution
professional at the address mentioned against entry No. 7.
Note:
• This notice to be published in at least one English and one vernacular
newspaper which is in circulation in the state where the debtor resides.
• affixed in the premises of the Adjudicating Authority; and
• placed on the website of the Adjudicating Authority
APPENDIX – C
List of Creditors
[Prepared under Section 104 of Insolvency and Bakruptcy Code 2016]
Amount Admitted
Nature of Claim
Amount Covered by Security Interest
Details of Security Interest Details of Claim
Amount Covered by Guarantee Admitted
APPENDIX - D
BEFORE THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
AT _________ – BENCH ___
CP/(IB)/……(…….)/…..
In the matter of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
And
……………............
……………............
……………............Applicant
Vs
……………............
……………............
……………............
……………............Respondent
Name : ……………….............………
Address ……………….............………
Mobile ……………….............………
3. [narrate the details of public notice, claim processed, list of creditors etc.,]
5. I have perused the detailed repayment plan to ascertain its compliance with the
IBC Code & related regulations as amended from time to time, reasonableness
of its prospects.
6. As per the requirements of Section 106 of IBC, I have prepared this detailed
report on the repayment plan,
1 Insolvency Law …. ….
2 Contract Law ….. …..
3 Direct Taxes ….. …..
4 Indirect Taxes …. ….
5 Labour Laws …. ….
6 Statutory Registration …. ….
and Compliance
related laws
7 ….. ….. …..
8 …. …. ….
9 …. …. ….
10 …. …. ….
18. It is submitted that, the assets are not purchased by any person as specified
under regulation 18 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency
Resolution Process for Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtors) Regulations,
2019.
[OR]
It is submitted that, the following assets are purchased by the list of persons
covered under Regulation 18 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
(Insolvency Resolution Process for Personal Guarantors to Corporate
Debtors) Regulations, 2019 with the specific approval of Adjudicating Authority
as detailed hereunder:
[OR]
20. It is submitted that, in compliance with the requirements of IBC, I have received
all the required details from ……[PG]……. [including latest state of affairs]
except the following documents …………………….
21. It is submitted that the Repayment plan complies with the requirements of
IBC on overall terms, more specifically into all compliance requirements as
tabulated above in this report and can be taken up for appropriate consideration
for voting / approval suitably.
[OR]
It is submitted that the Repayment plan does not complies with the requirements
of IBC on overall terms, more specifically into specific compliance requirements
as tabulated above in this report and can be decided upon suitably by respective
authorities.
Place: …………...............
Date: …………................
Resolution Professional
IBBI Reg.No.___________________