Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI

ACTIVITY DOCUMENTATION REPORT

Part 1 Background Information

A. Title of the Activity

AIP Review

B. Date
January 24, 2024

C. Venue
Grade seven classroom at Elena M. Mipaña National High School

D. Rationale of the Program/Activity

Midyear Performance review and evaluation allows the facilitation of giving
positive feedback as well as the identification of areas for improvement. This
activity provides an opportunity for discussing and assisting teachers to
improve their job performance and learning outcome positively. DepEd Order
No. 34, S. 2022 indicates the 5 days In-service Training (INSET) break for
the teacher or the Mid-Year Performance Review (MPRE) and midyear break
for learners.
This activity is very vital in school to ensure that the targets set during the
Performance Planning and commitment are being monitored, evaluated and
progress are being reported so that it could be achieved. Hence, this 5-day
activity is proposed.
The Annual Implementation Plan (AIP) is a plan that outlines exactly how
you will be reaching your goals for the year, and who in your team is
responsible for those outcomes. It links strategic goals and objectives to
tactical goals and objectives.
The Governance of Basic Education Act of 2001, (RA 9155), mandates the
state to empower schools and learning centers to make decisions and what
is best for the learners they serve. RA 9155 also entrusts to the school heads
the authority, accountability, and responsibility to develop school education
programs and monitor and evaluate its progress. The AIP Review and
Monitoring must be included in the MPRE.

E. Objectives of the Activity

Terminal Objective:

The activity aims to ensure that all the PPAs written in AIP will be
implemented and monitored.
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI
Enabling Objectives:
The aims of this session are;
1. To review all the PPAs in the AIP if they are implemented.
2. If not, make an action plan.
3. Must have a Monitoring Tool.
F. Expected Outcome and Results
(Define the expected end-result or impact of the activity (i.e. what should be
achieved, what changes must be observed after the activity)

1. Action Plan of all the unimplemented PPAs.

2. Monitoring tool.

E. Summary Profile of Participants

(Provide description of the participants such as Offices of origin, positions or
category of positions (administrative, technical, middle managers,
management/executives), sex disaggregation, total no. of pax, batches, etc.)

Name Position Sex

1. Khiara Mylene S. Teacher I Female
Dalungdong
2. Shaina J. Teacher I Female
Talangin
3. Jay Ismael B. Teacher I Male
Macadaag
4. Phoebe Joy C. Teacher I Female
Mericullo
5. Zyrah T. Cartel Teacher I Female
6. Jiezryl Joy G. Teacher I Female
Hermosa
7. Kenneth George Teacher I Male
V. Fernandez
8. Renato Pleños LSB Teacher Male
9. Ritsan J. Plazo Administrative Female
Officer II
10. Arthur B. Teacher III/ TIC Male
Besana

Teacher I – 7
Teacher III – 1
LSB Paid Teacher – 1
AO - 1

Part II Highlights of the Activity

A. Preliminary Activities
(Provide brief narration of preliminary activities prior to session proper)

Time Person In-charge

Day 1
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI
6:30-7:00 Arrival and AVP
Attendance
3:00-3:20 Phil. National Anthem AVP
Prayer AVP
Regional Hymn AVP
Sarangani Hymn AVP
7:30-11:30:
AM
Welcome Message Jay Ismael Macadaag
Statement of Purpose Kenneth George Fernandez
Message
Resource Speaker Khiara Mylene S. Dalundong

B. Key Learning and Output (per module/session)

(Provide description and synthesized proceedings of each
session/module with specific facilitators and key output)
The activities started on January 24, 2024 at exactly 7:30 AM where
the participants arrived on time and the program ends at exactly 5:00 PM.
First day will focus on Evaluation and school Progress in the implementation
of PPA’s, followed by Teacher’s MPRE, next is the learning and
development/gender and development activities, followed by Learner
Diversity and student’s inclusion, Assessment Report in the K to 12 Basic
Education Program, 21st century Skills and ICT Integration in Teaching
Assessment and lastly, the Curriculum Contextualization, localization and
Indigenization. Finally, the activities ended with consolidating the MOV’s.

C. Issues and Recommendations

(In a tabular form, list down all issues captured and the recommendations
including the responsible person/office)

Issue/Concern Recommendations/ Responsibl

Agreements e
Person/Offi
ce
Timelines were not Follow the timeline Coordinator
followed

Late arrival of the Time on task Coordinator

participants

Venue It must be held in a resort Coordinator/ AO

Uniform Print T-Shirt Coordinator / AO

 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI
D. Synthesis and Closing

The activities started on January 24, 2024 at exactly 7:30 AM where

the participants arrived on time and the program ends at exactly 5:00 PM. 2
days will be allotted for the review and evaluation of PPAs and IPCRF. 3
days will be provided for learning and development/gender and
development activities, Learner Diversity and student’s inclusion,
Assessment Report in the K to 12 Basic Education Program, 21 st century
Skills and ICT Integration in Teaching Assessment and Curriculum
Contextualization, localization and Indigenization. Finally, the activities
ended with consolidating the MOV’s.

Prepared by: Checked and Reviewed by:

ARTHUR B. BESANA ARACELI J. DINOPOL

School Head SEPS - SMME

Noted:

MA. SHIRLEY M. CARDINAL

SGOD Chief

Approved by:

RUTH L. ESTACIO PhD, CESO V

Schools Division Superintendent

Part III Annexes

 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI

A. M&E Analysis (Activity Evaluation Result)

(Based on the results of the End-of-Program Evaluation) Analysis should
include:

▪ Results from the participants’ evaluation of the program

Mean Qualitative
Indicator
Rating Description
1. Meeting the learning objectives and 3.80 Excellent
participant expectations
2. Relevance of the activity/program to your 3.80 Excellent
job.
3. Presentation Materials 3.60 Excellent
4. Methodologies 3.80 Excellent
5. Opportunities to Participate 3.80 Excellent
6. Time Management 3.00 Very Good
7. Program Management Team Performance 3.80 Excellent
8. Learning Facilitators / Trainers / Resource 3.80 Excellent
Speakers Performance
9. Venue 2.00 Very Good
10. Meals 4.00 Excellent
Overall Mean Rating
Grading scale for the qualitative rating value:
3.50-4.00 = Excellent;
2.50-3.45 = Very Good;
1.50-2.45 = Fair;
0-1.49 = Needs Improvement

● Results from participants’ evaluation of the Learning Facilitators

(LF) / Resource Speakers Performance

Name of LF/ Topic Mean Qualitative Strong Points for

Resource Speaker Rating Description Points Improvement
Arthur B. Besana Evaluation of 4 Excellent The speaker Add more
School Progress dig deeper to engaging
in the his topic. activities.
Implementation
of PPAs
Kenneth George Learners 4 Excellent The speaker The speaker
V. Fernandez Diversity and comprehensi needs to give
students vely Explain more examples
Inclusion his topic. for further
understanding.
Khiara Mylene S. Assessment 4 Excellent The speaker The speaker
Dalungdong Report in the K comprehensi needs to
to 12 Basic vely explain deepen her
Education her topic, understanding
Prgram she gives across topics.
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI
various
activities to
ensure
understandi
ng.
Phoebe Joy 21st Century 4 Excellent The speaker The speaker
Mericullo Skills and ICT excellently needs to lay
Integration in deliberates down various
Teaching the skills how to
Assessment. importance improve
of teachers skills
technology in utilizing the
skills, its 21st century
vitality to skills.
teachers and
students.
Zyrah T. Cartel Curriculum 4 The speaker The speaker
Contextualizatio comprehensi needs to
n, Localization vely explains provide more
and and utilizes examples for
Indigenization her topic. further
understanding.

● Results from participants’ Comments, Significant Observations and

Reflections

1. What are the facilitating factors that contributed to the success of the
participants’ learning experience?
● The cooperation of the speaker and participants.

● Friendly environment.

● The atmosphere is very friendly.

2. What are the hindering factors that contributed to the success of the
participants’ learning experience?
● Resources and electricity.

●
3. Take Aways / New Knowledge Gained / Reflections from the Sessions
● New knowledge and understanding of the vitality of each topic.

● The importance of paper works to tract our progress.

●
4. Areas for Improvement, Suggestions and Recommendations for Similar
Engagements in the Future
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
SOCCSKSARGEN REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SARANGANI

● Adding more activities.

● Various resources must be added.

●
5. Compliments and Good Remarks
● The essentiality of monitoring our own progress,

● The knowledge about students welfare.

B. Summarized Pre & Post-Test Results

D. Attendance Sheets

E. 2024 School INSET Participant Reporting Tool

F. Approved L&D Program Design

(Scanned Copy)

G. Approved M&E Plan for L&D / PD Program

(Scanned Copy)

H. Photo Documentation
(select photos of the highlights of the activity, including sample of participants’
best outputs and reflections)