Agampreet Singh

Ms. Leila Chawkat

Independent Research GT Period 3

13 May 2024

Improving Poverty within Neighborhoods: Attracting Investment in Disadvantaged Areas

Abstract

Poverty is a deep subject that most people overlook because of its challenging nature.

This research analyzes the effectiveness of government policies in encouraging investments and

alleviating poverty within urban neighborhoods. However, challenges such as inadequate

infrastructure and high crime rates continue to impede progress. This study advocates for

integrated approaches that combine economic and social infrastructure improvements to

effectively uplift economically disadvantaged communities.

Table of Contents

I. Introduction 2-3

II. Literature Review 3-10

III. Data Collection 10-16

IV. Analysis and Results 16-18

V. Discussion 18-19

VI. Conclusions 19-20

VII. References 20-24

 Introduction
"If we can conquer space, we can conquer childhood hunger" (Buzz Aldrin). The issue of

poverty in America has been a persistent concern for decades. Throughout the years, the

issue of poverty only worsened in communities. Investors play a pivotal role in the

development of urban areas, yet their involvement is often deterred by perceived high

economic risks and inadequate infrastructure, along with numerous other factors. This

avoidance further exacerbates the economic stagnation of these neighborhoods, creating a

vicious cycle of underinvestment and poverty. Moreover, the residents of these

communities face the brunt of these economic conditions, with limited access to quality

education, healthcare, and employment opportunities. The implications of this divide

extend beyond the economy, affecting social cohesion, public health, and overall quality

of life. Historically, poor urban areas have struggled with systemic barriers that limit

their economic growth and the well-being of their residents. These barriers are not merely

the result of contemporary economic cycles but are deeply rooted in decades of urban

policy, economic shifts, and changing demographics. In response to these challenges,

governments at various levels have been experimenting with a range of policies aimed at

stimulating economic development in underprivileged urban areas.

Moreover, the emergence of technology as a critical driver of economic development

presents an opportunity to bridge the economic gap. Community-driven technology

education centers can play a crucial role in this context, equipping residents with the
skills needed in a rapidly evolving job market and fostering a culture of innovation and

entrepreneurship. Investors often avoid poor urban areas due to high economic risks and

poor infrastructure; yet, effective government policies like opportunity zones and

subsidies, with a heavy focus on infrastructure improvement, along with the

establishment of community-driven technology education centers can improve these

conditions, encouraging investment and reducing the economic gap with wealthier

suburbs.

Literature Review

Economic actions taken by the government directly impact urban areas suffering

from poverty. Effective strategies to mitigate urban poverty involve direct financial

assistance and long-term investments in education, infrastructure, and community

development. These strategies are crucial for fostering environments where

underprivileged communities can thrive. The U.S. government has tried many strategies

to engage investment in these areas, even recently the Department of Transportation has

been told to enforce the granted 3.33 Billion Dollars in impoverished areas to attract

attention to these areas (DOT, 2024).

Government Incentives and Opportunity Zones have been implemented in the

past, and have worked to improve these impoverished areas. Opportunity Zones (OZs)

were introduced as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 to stimulate economic

growth in economically distressed communities through favorable capital gains treatment

for investments. The intent was to redirect capital into neglected areas, promising renewal

and economic vitality (IRS, 2023). Opportunity Zones enable investors to defer taxes on

prior gains, thereby incentivizing the reinvestment of those gains in designated districts
experiencing economic stagnation. This policy is predicated on the belief that such areas

are ripe for economic exploitation that could yield benefits both to investors and local

communities (Theodoes, et al., 2023). For a corporation or partnership to become a

qualified opportunity fund it must self-certify by annually filing Form 8996 with its

federal income tax. Once designated, qualified opportunity funds must invest at least 90%

of their assets in designated opportunity zones to be eligible for tax benefits (Murphy,

2022). Noting that while investment has increased significantly, reporting a rise from $4

billion in 2018 to a projected over $100 billion in equity by 2022, the real impact on

community development remains uncertain (Fikri, et al., 2023). This significant inflow of

capital indicates investor interest, but it does not automatically translate into equitable

economic growth or job creation in the target communities. The publication by the

Economic Innovation Group highlights the disconnect between investment volumes and

tangible economic benefits for local communities. In opportunity zones, this often means

that while capital is mobilized, the subsequent economic activities may not sufficiently

address the underlying social and economic disparities in the targeted areas. This issue

points to the need for more nuanced policy mechanisms that not only incentivize

investment but also ensure that such investments are directly linked to job creation and

genuinely benefit the local population. Ensuring that these investments have stipulated

outcomes related to local employment and service provision could potentially bridge the

gap between capital influx and community development outcomes (Sandhovel et al.,

2023). What is the Impact of Opportunity Zones on Employment Outcomes is a study

done by Rachel Atkins, Pablo Hernandez-Lagos, and other experts in the NYU Stern

School of Business. The study expresses varied results, with some showing modest
improvements in employment growth across industries and others finding negligible

effects on job postings or salaries. This disparity in outcomes highlights the challenge of

relying solely on economic incentives to foster community development. It also suggests

that the impact of OZs may be more significant on physical and economic infrastructure

than on the residents' economic conditions directly.

Tax Incentives and subsidies have also been used in the past to encourage

investment in these areas. Federal and state governments may offer grants/subsidies to

support businesses specifically in the costs to operate. These subsidies can come in

various forms, such as direct cash grants, reductions in utility costs, or tax credits against

income or property taxes. Subsidies may also be done through different programs. These

financial supports are designed to lower the entry barriers for businesses in sectors that

are vital for the local economy, such as manufacturing, technology, or healthcare. For

example, the Blueprint Medtech Small Business Translator Grant illustrates a targeted

approach where the government supports small businesses developing medical devices

through funding and access to essential services like safety testing and regulatory

compliance (US Chamber of Commerce, 2024). The grants not only help the business

owners and build structure in poor neighborhoods but also improve the economy.

However, much like Opportunity zones, studies, and research, such as those analyzed by

the Economic Innovation Group, suggest that while some areas see positive outcomes

from such investments, others experience minimal impacts, due to the uneven

distribution of economic assets and infrastructural advantages across regions. This

disparity often results in those with already existing resources and connectivity to further

leverage these advantages, widening the gap between the more developed and less
developed zones. This creates a cycle where the rich get richer, leaving behind areas that

lack the initial advantages necessary to attract and sustain significant investments.

Despite this, grants and subsidies continue to help businesses but in the modern economy,

grants and subsidies work to grow the economy. During the recovery from the Great

Recession, state-subsidized employment programs funded by the Temporary Assistance

for Needy Families (TANF) Emergency Fund placed more than a quarter-million people

in public and private-sector jobs, providing them with much-needed income and work

experience (Meyer, 2021). Finally, tax breaks have a significant influence on investment

in many sectors.

Addressing education is crucial for the development of any society. While often

overlooked, investing in education can fundamentally transform a community, leading to

substantial social and economic benefits. Enhanced educational facilities and

opportunities attract families looking for a better future for their children, thereby

increasing residential stability and community engagement. In areas where quality

education is hard to receive, Community-Driven Technology Centers come in to enhance

education and skills. “CTCs offer an important community-based environment in which

young people, many from low-income and minority backgrounds, can use technology in

creative learning experiences” (Sargent, 2022). CTCs provide critical access to

technology and skills training, helping bridge the digital divide that often separates

underprivileged communities from more affluent ones. This access is vital in preparing

residents, including the youth, for the increasingly digital and tech-driven world. The

presence of CTCs and improved educational facilities makes an area more attractive to

businesses looking for a skilled workforce. As residents become better trained and
educated, the local labor pool diversifies and expands, encouraging companies from tech

startups to larger corporations to consider these locations as viable options for setting up

operations. This leads to job creation, which stimulates local economies and can help

break the cycle of poverty that often grips underprivileged areas. Moreover, the

establishment of such educational centers can lead to a surge in community engagement

and empowerment, since technology is the future. Educated populations are more likely

to participate in civic activities, from voting to community organizing, which can lead to

sustained community development and governance improvements. This heightened

community profile attracts further investment, as businesses and governments are more

willing to invest in areas demonstrating a capacity for growth and stability. Furthermore,

educational improvements through facilities like CTCs can enhance the overall quality of

life in the area, making it more attractive for external investment. Improved educational

outcomes lead to higher property values, better public services, and a more vibrant local

economy. These factors make the area more appealing to potential investors who see a

community that is on the rise, both economically and socially. In addition to direct

economic benefits, educational empowerment through CTCs fosters innovation and

entrepreneurship within the community. Individuals with access to education and

technology are more likely to develop new ideas and start businesses that address local

needs, creating a self-sustaining cycle of innovation and investment. A benefit of having

educational centers in impoverished communities is educational and technological

offerings. are tailored to the needs and interests of the general local population. This

ensures that not one population is overlooked and that the needs of every individual is

represented and considered (Gomez, et al., 2010). The MDRC is an example of an

organization aimed at providing education and skills to people in impoverished

communities. MDRC is dedicated to learning what works to improve the well-being of

low-income groups. Education and infrastructure is so crucial when it comes to fighting

poverty. These underdeveloped communities lack the resources and funding to receive

proper education. Private organizations come into play which effectively help

low-income children stay in school, away from the troubled life that they are often

influenced by based on their location (MDRC, est. 1974). Violence and education are

directly correlated, as those living in poverty, and receiving poor education, tend to be

more violent with bad behaviors. (Mitra, 2020). Education is a way for individuals to find

opportunities in places other than crime, which worsens the conditions of neighborhoods.

Violence exacerbates economic struggles as it deters investment, diminishes the quality

of life, and destroys infrastructure, further entrenching the cycle of poverty. By slowly

improving educational access and quality through community-driven technology centers,

for example, communities can break this cycle, offering the youth viable alternatives to

violence and building a more stable economic foundation for generations to come.

Infrastructure in an area is the biggest contributor to poverty. The lack of adequate

infrastructure, such as transportation, utilities, and telecommunications, directly affects

economic opportunities by hindering access to markets, employment, and information.

Reducing poverty in areas allows investors to access a wider range of market

opportunities, tap into new consumer bases, and foster sustainable economic growth

which is essential to the growth of the country as a whole (Izquierdo et al., 2001). A

study by Calderón and Servén in 2010 for the World Bank establishes a clear link

between inadequate infrastructure and the perpetuation of poverty, noting that poor
transport networks limit access to job opportunities and make it costly to reach markets.

Similarly, research by Banerjee and Duflo (2011) demonstrates that the absence of

reliable electricity and water supply reduces the productivity of both individuals and

businesses, limiting economic growth and perpetuating poverty cycles. Poor

infrastructure also critically impacts health and educational outcomes, which are

significant determinants of poverty. Studies indicate that inadequate water and sanitation

facilities lead to higher incidence of diseases, which not only affects the health of

populations but also their economic productivity (WHO, 2023). In terms of education,

research by the Education Policy and Data Center (2016) shows that lack of access to

quality educational facilities—due to poor infrastructure—results in lower educational

attainment and, subsequently, reduced income potential. Social Inclusion and Access to

Services Infrastructure plays a pivotal role in social inclusion or exclusion, with

significant implications for poverty. Poor public transport systems disproportionately

affect low-income households, restricting their access to essential services such as

healthcare and education, which are critical for social mobility. Infrastructure is up to the

government to take a position and fix. The presence of slums in major cities around the

world underscores the direct link between inadequate infrastructure and poverty. Similar

to opportunity zones and subsidies, government policies in improving infrastructure can

help create a foundation for alleviating poverty, creating new opportunities, and allowing

investors to access a wider range of market opportunities, which leads to investment in

these impoverished areas.

To attract more investments in disadvantaged areas, poverty must be addressed,

and government actions must be taken to stimulate investment. The wealth disparity will
 narrow as the government implements initiatives to increase infrastructure and improve

on opportunity zones, and subsidies. The literature review provided information from

reliable sources and what several researchers had to say about this topic in their studies.

And now, the data collection portion will provide more information and data through

expert analysis.

Data Collection

Methods: To study the various methods of helping attract investments in poor urban areas

and examining the causes of decade-long poverty in areas, research had to be done qualitatively

through interviews. Qualitative research, particularly through interviews, allows for exploring

these different approaches to dealing with poverty in-depth, providing detailed insights into how

and why certain government policies and educational initiatives can attract investments to

economically challenged urban areas. Interviews can uncover insights that are not immediately

apparent through quantitative data alone. Experts working directly with urban development,

policy implementation, and community projects offer real-world perspectives that enrich the

analysis. Their experiences can highlight practical challenges, successes, and unexpected

outcomes of policies encouraging investment in poor urban areas. Interviews in this research can

highlight personal experiences and outcomes of specific interventions, such as the impact of

technology education centers on individual lives, which can be powerful evidence for the

effectiveness of these strategies. Understanding the different people involved and their roles in

helping reduce the struggles that people have in their lives. The interviewees for this data

collection process were primarily local activists deeply involved in efforts to fight poverty. These
experts are not only familiar with the challenges and dynamics of impoverished communities but

also actively engage in grassroots mobilization and community organization.

Chart/Table
Question

Person How do What are the Alright, Based on How do the

government primary factors that your expertise, economic risks of
Interviewed policies currently deter investors what policy investing in
impact investment from putting their changes would you impoverished urban
Name and in poorer urban resources into recommend to local neighborhoods
areas? Are there economically or federal differ from those in
any specific disadvantaged governments to wealthier suburban
Title,
policies that have urban areas? encourage areas?
proven either investment in these
Date/Time particularly areas?
beneficial or
detrimental?

Abhiveer Government Investors often I would just Investing in these

Zoria, Civil policies play a hesitate due to recommend areas carries risks
Engineer for crucial role. They concerns about governments like lower property
can offer tax security, provide more aid to values, potential for
a private
incentives and infrastructure, and the people so that crime, and
company in subsidies, and market potential. they can get out of uncertain economic
New York, public-private They worry about those growth. The risks
January 2, partnerships can crime rates, neighborhoods. I in affluent
2024 encourage inadequate would also try to suburban areas are
investment. transportation, and enforce greater different, often
However, I think uncertain returns in laws and better more related to
that a lack of economically regulations because market saturation
supportive disadvantaged crime is so bad out and higher
infrastructure can areas. There are there. I mean you competition. But
be detrimental. I’ve also other things to can see kids taking the difference that
heard of some consider like drugs and dealing it I’ve seen between
policies in the past infrastructure in like it is nothing. places like Middle
that have tried to those areas. It's Town and Rosyln
encourage very hard to start Heights is crazy. I
investments but something up and have a friend who
have failed. The keep it going when comfortably does
government has the people live off of commercial
reform FIRST and crime as well. construction in
take responsibility, Some people think Roslyn Heights
that's what I think that investing in with his father and
at least. those areas is a they tried to invest
crime on its own, in other areas but it
it's hard to make
 money out there, just didn't work out
and the help that for them.
investors try to give
to those areas ends
up going in vain.
Also, growing up
around friends who
are interested in
construction and
homebuilding, I
tend to notice how
there's always a
specific type of
location they look
to work in, ignoring
these areas.

Terri Acker, Yes, government Investors are From my time The economic risks
Community policies and actions deterred by the working to help of investing in
Organizer at are very important. systemic neglect people, I would impoverished urban
Many have been and lack of suggest that the neighborhoods
Bread for
effective but I can infrastructure in local and federal differ significantly
the City US, tell you how the economically governments make from those in
March 17, government can disadvantaged a number of policy wealthier suburban
2024 impact investment urban areas. The changes to attract areas. While both
negatively. absence of basic investment in these entail risks, the
Specifically, the amenities and the places. First, the unique challenges
Section 8 housing lack of basic human Section 8 voucher faced by
system, touted as a needs. Investors system needs to be economically
solution for may also be completely disadvantaged
housing deterred by the rethought to make urban areas stem
affordability, falls difficulty of sure it delivers on from systemic
short of its successfully its promises of disinvestment and
promises. investing in such an good and cheap neglect. There are
Residents are area and making housing. This more problems for
forced to negotiate money from it. includes stricter investors to deal
a maze of ways to hold with, like higher
challenges on their landowners crime rates, limited
own despite the responsible for access to financing,
appearance of help, keeping apartment and bad
from limited buildings habitable infrastructure,
options for housing and giving which raises the
to bureaucratic residents the help risks of investing.
obstacles put in they need to Considering a
place by landlords. navigate the rental location bias,
The lack of market. I have had investors who are
oversight and friends dealing interested in both
enforcement by with issues with places often forget
agencies like the landlords because about the poor area.
DCHA only they don't make
 exacerbates the section 8 housings
situation, leaving a priority and
residents consider it free
vulnerable to cash flow.
exploitation by Additionally, I
corrupt landlords. think the
As you mentioned government should
tax incentives in continue with Tax
the interview, I recesses, grants,
agree that they and low-interest
attract investments loans that can
and are quite encourage
effective. entrepreneurs to
work on projects
that help the
community and
give investors a
good return on their
money.
Streamlining
governmental
processes and
giving small
businesses
technical help can
also make it easier
for new companies
to start up and
boost the economy
in these areas.
Sometimes
entrepreneurs are
forced to start in a
specific location
and it may be in
that poor location.
If the government
can help those
businesses, maybe
the area could clean
up and the
economy grow
stronger.

Erika Government The perceived high I believe that fixing There is going to
Chavarria, policies play a risk and low return this poverty issue is be a greater risk in
Founder and crucial role in on investment is very hard. I feel poorer areas than in
either attracting or what influences like the the suburbs.
Executive repelling investors to avoid government should Suburbs tend to get
Director of investment in these areas. These find a way to get nicer and nicer in
Columbia economically areas often grapple rid of that area time, whereas poor
disadvantaged with issues such as altogether and areas struggle to
Community
urban areas. For higher crime rates, replace some stand and get worse
Care, March instance, tax underdeveloped housing with a and worse over the
16, 2024 incentives and infrastructure, and a supermarket or years. Wealthier
opportunity zones lack of skilled something, rebuild suburban areas tend
have shown workforce, which the economy in that to offer more stable
promise in can complicate the area. The aim investment
encouraging some prospects of any would be to not environments, with
investors to take a business only enhance the predictable returns
second look at happening. Crimes physical landscape and lower
these areas. These could directly affect of that area but also perceived risk, as
policies can lower the investor, to foster a mentioned earlier.
the financial depending on what community where The economy in the
barriers and risks kind of residents have easy suburbs is
associated with occupational access to essential constantly
investing in places adventure they’re services and regulated and
perceived as less on. There's also the employment unlike poor urban
economically matter of financial opportunities. It neighborhoods,
stable. However, accessibility; would be a education is not
it's not all positive. securing loans or complicated project neglected and is
Stringent zoning other forms of to change a whole amazing.
laws and regulatory financing is area, but it could
hurdles can act as markedly more take down the
significant challenging for disgusting houses
deterrents, making projects in these and maybe recreate
it both regions, attributed them with clean
time-consuming to the higher duplexes and foster
and costly to perceived risks by job opportunities.
initiate projects. financial
But in my institutions. One
experiences as a time when heading
community to the city, I saw a
volunteer and corner store packed
helper, I feel that with people. It was
the government’s running well, and it
aid has been very showed that things
beneficial and has could work out, but
allowed us to push it always has to
our movement and depend on
objectives further, something,
especially when we
are given small
grants so that we
can do bigger
projects.
Sharon My experiences The primary factors The primary factors In poorer urban
Strauss, working with deterring investors deterring investors areas, the risks are
Community individuals and from economically from economic compounded by
families in poverty disadvantaged are recommend local social challenges,
Action
has given me a not just about and federal including higher
Agency unique perspective financial returns governments to crime rates and
Executive at on how but also about encourage educational
Maryland government social stability and investment in these deficits, which can
CAPDirector policies currently the potential for areas by focusing deter investment.
, March, 6 impact investment long-term growth. on comprehensive However, the
in poorer urban Investors are often community potential for
areas. From my wary of the social development. This positive social
standpoint, one challenges, involves not only impact and
significant including high creating financial community
observation is that crime rates and incentives but also transformation is
while certain educational investing in social also greater. From
policies aim to deficits, which can infrastructure, such my perspective, the
foster economic undermine the as enhancing difference lies not
development, they potential for educational just in financial
often fall short sustainable programs, returns but in the
without the development. supporting local opportunity to
foundation of Economic businesses through foster significant,
community initiatives must be mentorship and positive, and
engagement and coupled with social grants, and lasting social
support. Instead of improvements to improving public change. More on
relying solely on make an area truly safety. A education in richer
fiscal incentives, investable. two-generational suburbs, the
which can be approach, or educational
beneficial but "2Gen," which we structure in richer
sometimes advocate for at neighborhoods sets
misdirected, I MCAP, addresses up an area for
believe in the the needs of both decade-long
power of parents and expansion, as
integrating children in education creates
community low-income opportunities.
development families, thus
strategies with ensuring a smooth
economic upliftment of the
initiatives to create community.
a more holistic
approach to uplift
underprivileged
areas. When the
typical rich person
sees opportunities
to make money,
they can often
exploit it and find
ways to make
money effecientlky,
 even if it means to
disregard the needs
of the people that
they supposedly
invest for.

Luis Perez, Policies related to The factors that I Based on my Theres a very large
Nonprofit taxation and see are high risks, experience and difference between
Accelerator economic regulatory barriers, expertise, I would the risks of
Manager at development inadequate recommend several impoverished
Maryland incentives can infrastructure, and policy changes to neighborhoods and
either attract or social challenges local and federal the suburbs. While
Nonprofits,
deter investors. For such as crime and governments to suburban areas may
March 9, instance, initiatives unemployment. encourage offer a more stable
2024 like Opportunity Addressing these investment in these investment
Zones have shown barriers requires a areas. Firstly, there environment with
promise in multifaceted needs to be a focus lower perceived
incentivizing approach that on creating a more risks, investing in
investment by involves both supportive economically
offering tax breaks government regulatory disadvantaged
to investors in interventions and environment. urban areas can
designated community-led Streamlining lead to greater
economically initiatives. But I permitting social impact and
distressed areas. strongly believe processes, contribute to
However, the that the people providing tax community
impact of such living in these areas incentives revitalization. But
policies can vary, must learn to leave specifically then again, many
and there's a need their old lives targeted at investors may not
for greater behind and think of businesses have that money to
accountability to their future. I grew investing in spend towards a
ensure that the up with not so disadvantaged cause that is sadly
benefits reach the much, and some of areas, and offering impossible to solve
communities most the brothers I grew technical assistance alone. That's how I
in need. I’ve seen up with struggle to to navigate see it.
cases where leave their life regulatory
opportunity zones behind. This complexities can
were used strictly suggests that make it easier for
to the investor's maybe investors to engage
advantage, not the communities can in these
people. gather together and communities.
offer counseling of
some sort.

Analysis/Results

After gathering large amounts of information from reputable sources, a series of interviews were

collected for additional data collection. Examining and interpreting the data found 3 common
trends in the interviews. It's evident that government policies, such as tax incentives and business

guarantees, play a crucial role in influencing investment decisions. The interviews underscored

the significant impact of government policies on encouraging or deterring investment. Tax

incentives, subsidies, and public-private partnerships were highlighted as beneficial policies.

However, the lack of supportive infrastructure and regulatory barriers were pointed out as

detrimental. While some policies, like Opportunity Zones and tax incentives, have shown

promise in attracting investment, others, like the Section 8 housing system, have fallen short of

expectations. The insights provided by Zoria, Acker, Perez, and Chavarria highlight the need for

targeted policy reforms that address the specific needs and challenges of economically

disadvantaged communities while fostering collaboration between government, nonprofits, and

private sector partners. In the end, almost every interviewee seemed to agree that

government-centered policies and initiatives were the best ways to deal with situations like the

decade-long poverty situation brought in various neighborhoods. The government would have

the greatest impact in all areas of addressing such issues. By addressing these barriers and

promoting inclusive economic development strategies, governments can encourage investment

and promote greater equity and opportunity in economically disadvantaged urban areas. Another

trend was that almost every interviewee mentioned a consistent observation across the

interviews, which was that socio-economic challenges such as high crime rates, inadequate

transportation, and uncertain market potential deter investors. This trend emphasizes the need for

comprehensive strategies that address both the economic and social dimensions of urban poverty.

The interviewees addressed education and highlighted its importance and relation to poverty. The

final trend in the interviews was the recommendations for policy reforms to attract investments.

Experts recommended several policy changes, including more aid and better regulations to
improve safety, rethinking the Section 8 voucher system for housing, and providing tax recesses,

grants, and loans to encourage entrepreneurship. Every interviewee seemed to agree on specific

government actions that can stimulate investment and support community development.

The consistency of opinions across interviews lends credibility to these findings, suggesting that

the data accurately reflect the complex realities of investing in impoverished urban areas.

Discussion

The results from this research highlight the multifaceted challenges and potential solutions

regarding investment in economically disadvantaged urban areas. While policies like tax

incentives and opportunity zones have shown promise in attracting investment, others such as the

Section 8 housing system have fallen short of expectations. This underscores the importance of

targeted policy reforms that address the specific needs and challenges of economically

disadvantaged communities. My research will give a basis for researchers to use. A basis where

they can use my possible poverty reduction, investment investment-increasing strategies and

study those strategies and their real effectiveness. My Interviews revealed the complex interplay

between economic risks, infrastructure deficiencies, and social challenges that deter investors

from these areas. Concerns about security, inadequate infrastructure, and uncertain market

potential are pervasive, highlighting the need for comprehensive approaches that tackle systemic

issues. Moving forward, researchers and policymakers should prioritize collaborative efforts to

develop and implement targeted interventions that promote inclusive economic development in

economically disadvantaged urban areas. By addressing barriers to investment and fostering

community empowerment, governments can create environments conducive to sustainable

economic growth and improved quality of life for all residents. Additionally, continued
monitoring and evaluation of policy interventions are essential to ensure their effectiveness and

equitable distribution of benefits. Ultimately, addressing the challenges of investment in

economically disadvantaged urban areas requires a concerted effort from all stakeholders to

create lasting and meaningful change.

Conclusion

Urban areas have been fighting poverty for decades. Experts have proposed solutions to enhance

economic development through targeted investments and policy reforms. The research has

underscored the pivotal role of government policies, such as tax incentives and opportunity

zones, in incentivizing investment in economically disadvantaged neighborhoods. However, it

has also acknowledged the limitations of certain policies, like the Section 8 housing system, in

fully addressinAmerican g the multifaceted needs of these communities. The findings have

emphasized the necessity of holistic approaches that not only tackle economic barriers but also

address systemic issues such as inadequate infrastructure, high crime rates, and regulatory

obstacles. Community-driven initiatives, such as technology education centers, have emerged as

promising avenues for boosting education and skills development, thereby empowering residents

to participate more effectively in the evolving job market. Moreover, the research has highlighted

the importance of collaboration among government entities, nonprofits, and private sector

partners to establish supportive regulatory frameworks and promote inclusive economic

development. By tackling on the root causes of poverty and investing in infrastructure

improvements, governments may create conditions that promote long-term economic growth and

a higher quality of life for all community members. Ultimately, this research contributes valuable

insights to the ongoing discourse on poverty alleviation and economic development, offering

evidence-based strategies for attracting investment and advancing social equity in

underprivileged urban areas. Through the implementation of these strategies and a commitment

to community engagement, governments can work towards building more resilient and

prosperous communities for the future. The road to overcoming poverty will be difficult.

However, it is human nature to unite during times of distress, which will hold anything together.

References

Atkins, R. M. B., Hernandez-Lagos, P., Jara-Figueroa, C., & Seamans, R. (2020, August 26).

What is the impact of opportunity zones on employment?. SSRN. Retrieved from

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3673986

Calderon, C., & Serven, L. (2004). The Effects of Infrastructure Development on Growth and

Income Distribution. World Bank. Retrieved from

https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/1813-9450-3400
Cheslia, A. C. (2019). Place-based tax incentives for Community Development. Retrieved from

https://www.huduser.gov/portal/periodicals/em/SpringSummer19/highlight1.html

COMMERCE, U. C. O. (2020, March 11). Free grants and programs for small business. CO.

Retrieved from

https://www.uschamber.com/co/run/business-financing/small-business-grants-and-program

Cullinan, D., & Mayer, A. (2015). Aid like a paycheck. Retrieved from

https://www.mdrc.org/work/projects/aid-paycheck

Deacon, A., & Carluccio, S. (2022). The opportunity to invest in sustainable and Resilient Urban

Infrastructure. Retrieved from

https://www.preventionweb.net/news/opportunity-invest-sustainable-and-resilient-urban-i

nfrastructure-0#:~:text=By%20making%20major%20investments%20in,and%20sustaina

ble%20long%2Dterm%20development

Devarajan, S., Brown, W., & Ames, B. (2001). Macroeconomic policy and poverty reduction.

Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/exrp/macropol/eng/

Fikri, K. (2024). Are opportunity zones working? what the literature tells Us. Economic

Innovation Group. Retrieved from https://eig.org/opportunity-zones-research-brief/

Freedman, M., & Khanna, S. (2021, June). The impacts of opportunity zones on zone residents.

CENSUS-WP. Retrieved from

https://www2.census.gov/ces/wp/2021/CES-WP-21-12.pdf

Hickey, D. (2023). Economic Development Incentives . SelectUSA. Retrieved from

https://www.trade.gov/sites/default/files/2021-05/Chapter%2011%20-%20Economic%20

Development%20Incentives.pdf

Hoover. (1999). Welfare for the well-off: How business subsidies fleece taxpayers. Hoover

Institution. Retrieved from

https://www.hoover.org/research/welfare-well-how-business-subsidies-fleece-taxpayers

Kocivar, C. (2021). To improve education, address poverty. Retrieved from

https://ed100.org/blog/to-improve-education-address-poverty

Meyer, L. (2021). Subsidized employment: A proven strategy to aid an equitable economic

recovery. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Retrieved from

https://www.cbpp.org/research/income-security/subsidized-employment-a-proven-strateg

y-to-aid-an-equitable-economic

Murphy, C., & Anderson, S. (2016). Opportunity zone: Meaning, advantages, criticism.

Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/opportunity-zone-5207933

Rodrik, D. (2007). Economic growth: The impact on poverty reduction, ... Retrieved from

https://www.oecd.org/derec/unitedkingdom/40700982.pdf

Sandhovel, A., Glasne, B., & Fikri, K. (2023). Are opportunity zones working? what the

literature tells Us. Retrieved from

https://eig.org/opportunity-zones-research-brief/#:~:text=Being%20designated%20an%2

0Opportunity%20Zone,available%20and%20more%20elastic%20housing

Sargent, M. (2002). Community Technology Centers: A national movement to close the digital

divide. Retrieved from

https://www.edutopia.org/community-technology-centers-national-movement-close-digit

al-divide

Scott, G., & Team, I. (2024). Subsidies: Definition, how they work, Pros and Cons. Retrieved

from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/subsidy.asp

Theodoes, B., McManus, S., & Meixell, B. (2023). What we do and don’t know about

opportunity zones. Retrieved from

https://www.urban.org/urban-wire/what-we-do-and-dont-know-about-opportunity-zones

TRANSPORTATION, D. O. (2024). Biden-Harris Administration announces history-making

$3.3 billion for locally-led projects that reconnect communities as part of president

Biden’s investing in America Agenda. U.S. Department of Transportation. Retrieved from

https://www.transportation.gov/briefing-room/biden-harris-administration-announces-hist

ory-making-33-billion-locally-led-projects#:~:text=Now%20the%20Biden%2DHarris%2

0administration,care%2C%20and%20other%20essentials.%E2%80%9D