Full and para Virtualization
Uploaded by
HEMALAKSHMI DFull and para Virtualization
Uploaded by
HEMALAKSHMI DDifference between Full Virtualization and Para virtualization
Virtualization allows one computer system to perform the functions of numerous computers by
sharing the resources of single hardware across multiple environments. CPU virtualization
includes both full virtualization and paravirtualization. The key difference between them is that
in full virtualization, the unmodified OS is unaware of the virtualization and employs binary
translation to trap operating system calls at run-time. In contrast, paravirtualization uses
hypercalls in place of non-virtualizable operating system instructions, and the complete process
occurs during the compile time, where these instructions are managed.
In this article, you will learn about the difference between Full
Virtualization and Paravirtualization in the operating system. But before discussing the
differences, you must know about Full Virtualization and Paravirtualization in the operating
system.
What is Full Virtualization?
Full virtualization is the first generation of software solutions for server virtualization. It was
developed by IBM in 1966. It operates by combining binary translation and direct compilation,
where the guest operating system is completely separated from the basic hardware and
virtualization layer. As a result, whatever the virtual machines produce, the underlining hardware
is rewritten by a dynamic translator. It involves a lack of expertise in virtualization on the guest
OS end, and change is inevitable.
ESXi, VMWare, and Microsoft virtual servers are the technologies that provide full
virtualization capabilities. When an OS instruction is created, the hypervisor immediately
translates it during run-time and stores the result for future reference. At the same time, the user-
level instructions are run without changes at native speed.
Although the primary goal of storing the translated instructions during binary translation is to
improve performance, it may raise the cost of memory usage. Binary translation is another
drawback of full virtualization because it consumes a lot of time and may get a huge
performance overhead. I/O intensive apps are complicated to use in full virtualization.
What is Paravirtualization?
The interaction of the guest operating system with the hypervisor to improve performance and
productivity is known as paravirtualization. Unlike full virtualization, paravirtualization does
not achieve full isolation; instead, the approach implements partial isolation. It also alters the
operating system kernel to use hypercalls rather than non-virtualizable instructions. The goal of
hypercalls is to communicate with the virtualization layer hypervisor directly.
The hypervisor performs different functions in paravirtualization, such as the layout of the
hypercalls interface for other critical kernel services like memory management, timekeeping, and
interrupt handling. The main benefit of paravirtualization is that it may significantly minimize
virtualization overhead.
However, most userspace workloads gain relatively little and achieve near-native performance
that is not reached for all workloads. Moreover, it is little compatible and portable because it
doesn't support the unmodified operating system. It may also cause specific critical support and
maintainability issues in the production environment due to the requirement for extensive OS
kernel modifications.
Key differences between Full Virtualization and Paravirtualization in
Operating System
Here, you will learn about the various key differences between Full
Virtualization and Paravirtualization multitasking in operating systems. Some main differences
between Full Virtualization and Paravirtualization multitasking in operating systems are as
follows:
1. Full virtualization is the first generation of software solutions for server virtualization. On
the other hand, the interaction of the guest operating system with the hypervisor to
improve performance and productivity is known as paravirtualization.
2. Full virtualization enables the Guest operating system to run independently. In contrast,
paravirtualization enables the Guest OS to interact with the hypervisor.
3. Full virtualization performance is slow. In contrast, paravirtualization performance is
high than full virtualization.
4. Full virtualization is less secure than paravirtualization. On the other hand,
paravirtualization is more secure than full virtualization.
5. Binary translation and a direct approach are used in full virtualization. On the other hand,
paravirtualization operates through hypercalls.
6. Full virtualization is more portable and adaptable. On the other hand, paravirtualization is
less portable and compatible.
7. Full virtualization supports all the Guest OS without any change. On the other hand, the
Guest OS has to be modified in paravirtualization and only a few OS support it.
8. The Guest OS will issue hardware calls in full virtualization. In contrast, the guest OS
will interface directly with the hypervisor via drivers in paravirtualization.
9. Full virtualization is less efficient than paravirtualization. On the other hand,
paravirtualization is more simplified.
10. The optimum isolation is provided by full virtualization. On the other hand,
paravirtualization offers less isolation than full virtualization.
11. There are just a few paravirtualization examples, such as VMware and Xen. In contrast,
full virtualization is used in VMware, Microsoft, and Parallels systems.