BS en 1295-1-1997
BS en 1295-1-1997
BS en 1295-1-1997
1295-1:1997
Incorporating
corrigenda May 2006 ,
July 2008, February
2010 and March 2010
Structural design of
buried pipelines under
various conditions of
loading —
Part 1: General requirements
--`,``,,````,,,,`,,,,`,`,,`````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
ICS 23.040.01
12&23<,1*:,7+287%6,3(50,66,21(;&(37$63(50,77('%<&23<5,*+7/$:
Copyright British Standards Institution
Provided by Accuris under license with BSI - Uncontrolled Copy Licensee=WSP Group/5970250001, User=Pun, Ronald
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from Accuris Not for Resale, 10/03/2023 03:56:09 MDT
BS EN 1295-1:1997
National foreword
ICS 23.040.01
Descriptors: Sanitation, water supply, water removal, water pipelines, buried pipes, pressure pipes, sewage, computation, mechanical
strength, loads: forces
English version
This European Standard was approved by CEN on 1997-06-29. CEN members are
bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the
conditions for giving this European Standard the status of a national standard
without any alteration.
Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references concerning such national standards
may be obtained on application to the Central Secretariat or to any CEN member.
This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German).
A version in any other language made by translation under the responsibility of a
CEN member into its own language and notified to the Central Secretariat has the
same status as the official versions.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Czech
Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy,
Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and
United Kingdom.
CEN
--`,``,,````,,,,`,,,,`,`,,`````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
1997 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CEN national
Members.
Ref. No. EN 1295-1 : 1997 E
Foreword
6.4 Buckling of pressure pipes 6
This European Standard has been prepared by
Technical Committee CEN/TC 165, Waste water 6.5 Thrusts and longitudinal stresses 6
engineering, the Secretariat of which is held by DIN. 7 Influence of construction procedures 6
This European Standard shall be given the status of a 7.1 General 6
national standard, either by publication of an identical
text or by endorsement at the latest by January 1998, 7.2 Trenching procedures 6
and conflicting national standards shall be withdrawn 7.3 Pipe bedding 6
at the latest by January 1998. 7.4 Filling procedures 7
According to the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations,
the national standards organizations of the following 8 Design philosophies and factors of
countries are bound to implement this European safety 7
--`,``,,````,,,,`,,,,`,`,,`````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
--`,``,,````,,,,`,,,,`,`,,`````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
installation and working practices.
structural design and indicates the references and the
In view of these differences, and of the time required basic principles of the nationally established methods
to develop a common design method which would of design (see annexes A and B).
fully reflect the various considerations identified in
particular national methods, a two stage approach has
been adopted for the development of this European 2 Normative references
Standard. This European Standard incorporates, by dated or
In accordance with this two stage approach, the joint undated reference, provisions from other publications.
working group, at its initial meeting, resolved `first to These normative references are cited at the
produce an EN giving guidance on the application of appropriate places in the text and the publications are
nationally established methods of structural design of listed hereafter. For dated references, subsequent
buried pipelines under various conditions of loading, amendments to or revisions of any of the publications
whilst working towards a common method of apply to this European Standard only when
structural design'. This standard represents the incorporated in it by amendment or revision. For
implementation of the first part of that resolution. undated references, the latest edition of the publication
referred to applies.
1 Surface
2 Bottom of road or railway construction, if any
3 Trench walls
4 Main backfill (3.6)
5 Initial backfill (3.5)
6 Sidefill (3.12)
7 Upper bedding
8 Lower bedding
9 Trench bottom
10 Depth of cover (3.3)
11 Depth of bedding (3.1)
12 Depth of embedment (3.4)
13 Trench depth (3.13)
a Depth of lower bedding
b Depth of upper bedding
c Depth of initial backfill
3.1.1 compaction 4.2 The future owner of the pipeline is free to specify
Deliberate densification of soil during the construction the appropriate method of design to be adopted.
process. 4.3 The designer shall determine whether or not the
3.1.2 consolidation pipeline comes within the scope of the methods
covered by this standard.
Time-dependent densification of soil by processes
other than those deliberately applied during 4.4 The design adopted shall be such that
construction. construction may be carried out safely and so as to
ensure that the design assumptions regarding the
3.1.3 embedment
influence of construction procedures and soil
Arrangement and type(s) of material(s) around a characteristics will be satisfied.
buried pipeline which contribute to its structural
performance. 4.5 Subject to the other requirements of clause 4,
design should be carried out preferably using in its
3.2 Design terms entirety one of the methods in annex B of this
standard.
--`,``,,````,,,,`,,,,`,`,,`````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
3.2.1 bedding factor
Ratio of the maximum design load for the pipe, when 4.6 Methods of design, in accordance with annex B,
installed with a particular embedment, to the test load when presented in the form of tables, charts or
which produces the same maximum bending moment. computer programmes, shall be deemed equivalent to a
full calculation, provided that any simplification does
3.2.2 design pressure (DP) not reduce the level of safety to below that which
Maximum operating internal pressure of the system or would be obtained by full design. Outputs from
of the pressure zone fixed by the designer considering computer programmes shall be capable of verification.
future developments but excluding surge.
4.7 Where a design method other than one of those in
3.2.3 load bearing capacity annex B is employed, the designer shall satisfy himself
Load per unit length that a particular combination of that the method constitutes a coherent system and
pipe and embedment can sustain without exceeding a provides the level of safety required.
limit state. 4.8 Account shall be taken of the probable
3.2.4 maximum design pressure (MDP) consequences of pipeline failure in establishing the
Maximum operating internal pressure of the system or acceptable level of safety.
of the pressure zone fixed by the designer considering 4.9 The values adopted for all variables, including
future developments and including surge, where: factors of safety, shall be in accordance with the
± MDP is designated MDPa when there is a fixed method used.
allowance for surge;
± MDP is designated MDPc when the surge is 5 Basis of design procedures
calculated.
5.1 General
3.2.5 silo effect Whilst there are differences between some of the
Effect whereby lateral earth pressure in trench backfill established national design procedures, there are no
causes friction at the trench wall to carry part of the differences in respect of the fundamental basis of
weight of the backfill. design, which is the interactive system consisting of
3.2.6 soil-structure interaction the pipe and the surrounding soil.
Process whereby the deformations of soil and/or pipe The external loadings to be considered shall include
caused by the contact and reaction pressures between that due to the backfill, that due to the most severe
a pipe and the surrounding soil distribute the pressures surface surcharge or traffic loading likely to occur, and
to achieve equilibrium. those due to any other causes, producing a loading of
significant magnitude such as self weight of the pipe
3.2.7 system test pressure (STP) and water weight, as appropriate. The internal pressure
Hydrostatic pressure applied to a newly laid pipeline in in the pipeline, if different from atmospheric, shall also
order to ensure its integrity and tightness. be treated as a loading.
The design of the pipeline, and its embedment, shall
provide an adequate level of safety against the
4 Requirements appropriate ultimate limit state being exceeded. In
4.1 All pipelines shall be designed to withstand the addition, the design loading shall not result in any
various loadings to which they are expected to be appropriate serviceability limit state being exceeded.
subjected, during construction and operation, without
detriment to their function and to the environment.
--`,``,,````,,,,`,,,,`,`,,`````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
--`,``,,````,,,,`,,,,`,`,,`````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
to be constant in the longitudinal direction. The pipes and according to second order theory in
structural system of the pipe consists of an elastically consideration of the re-rounding effect for semi-rigid
embedded circular ring. and flexible pipes.
B.2.2.4 Loading B.2.3 Denmark
The following load cases are considered: B.2.3.1 Loads
± a vertical earth pressure, taking into account the ± Types of loads
concentration factor of vertical earth pressure, a Permanent loads:
coefficient of lateral earth pressure and the
distribution of the reaction forces depending on the ± earth load;
pipe-soil system stiffness; ± self weight of pipe.
± a lateral earth pressure, composed of a uniformly Variable loads:
distributed pressure resulting from the vertical earth ± uniformly distributed surface load;
pressure and the lateral soil reaction due to the ± traffic load;
deformation of the pipe;
± load from external and internal water pressure.
± vertical superimposed concentrated and distributed
traffic loads, taking into account the road structure; ± Distribution of load and bedding reactions
± internal water load. The vertical load is assumed uniformly distributed
over a width equal to the external width of the pipe.
B.2.2.5 Type of pipes The bedding reaction is assumed to be a vertical
Asbestos-cement pipes are classified amongst action uniformly distributed over a width depending
semi-rigid pipes. Therefore, as a function of the on the bedding class for circular pipes or the width
pipe-soil system stiffness, different soil pressure of the base for pipes with a base.
distributions are suggested.
In the longitudinal direction of the pipe the bedding B.2.3.3 Partial safety factors
reaction is assumed to be uniformly distributed. If the ± Design loads
length of the pipe is large in relation to its diameter,
due consideration shall be given as to the validity of The design load is determined as the sum of the
this assumption. characteristic permanent load and the characteristic
variable load, both multiplied by the actual partial
± Determination of loads safety factor gf.
The permanent and the variable loads are determined For the serviceability limit state gf is 1,0 for both
as follows. types of loads and for the ultimate limit state gf is
± Earth load 1,0 for the permanent load and 1,3 for the variable
The characteristic vertical load on a pipe is: load.
nj = lghd kN/m2 ± Design material parameters
where l is the earth load coefficient, g is the specific The design value of the load bearing capacity of the
weight of the backfill (kN/m3) and hd is the height of pipe is determined as the characteristic value divided
earth cover (m) with the relieving effect of the by the actual partial safety factor gm.
lateral pressure being included in l. gm is 1,3 to 1,5 depending on the factory production
--`,``,,````,,,,`,,,,`,`,,`````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
The standard gives values for l depending on the control, when estimating the load bearing capacity
installation conditions (e.g. l = 1,6 for normal laying on the basis of full scale tests.
class and g = 21 kN/m3) which can be used instead For reinforced pipes which are structurally analysed
of a closer examination according to Marston. solely on the basis of calculations, partial safety
± Self weight of pipe factors for the reinforcement, respectively the
concrete, shall be fixed according to the standard for
The loading effect of the self weight of the pipe shall
design of concrete structures.
be included, either as a reduction in the load bearing
capacity of the pipe or as an equivalent addition to B.2.3.4 Calculations
the vertical load. It shall be proved that the design load bearing capacity
± Uniformly distributed surface load of a pipe is greater than the design effect of actions
The action on the pipe is nq = lq kN/m2 from a considered.
uniformly distributed characteristic surface ± Determination of effects of actions
load q kN/m2. When determining the internal forces with a view to
± Traffic loads evaluating the serviceability limit state, the elasticity
The action from any wheel loads is determined in theory shall be used with the commonly accepted
accordance with Boussinesq's theory. approximations.
For roads, a three-axle load group is assumed in When determining the internal forces with a view to
which each axle load consists of two wheel loads evaluating the ultimate state, the elasticity theory
of 65 kN for normal and 100 kN for heavy road shall be applied in the case of unreinforced pipes,
traffic. These loads include an impact factor which is and either the elasticity theory or the plasticity
independent of the earth cover. theory in the case of reinforced pipes.
± Load from external and internal water pressure ± Determination of load bearing capacity
The effect on a pipe due to its water-filled state shall For unreinforced pipes the load bearing capacity is
normally be included, either as a deduction in the determined by a calculation on the basis of the
load bearing capacity of the pipe or as an equivalent actual laying conditions and the declared design
addition to the vertical load. strength based on the crushing test load.
For reinforced pipes the load bearing capacity may
B.2.3.2 Safety
be determined on the basis of tests or calculations.
The safety shall be evaluated in accordance with the If calculations are applied, the rules of the standard
partial coefficient method. The load bearing capacity of for design of concrete structures shall be applied.
a pipe can either be determined arithmetically or by a
± Determination of laying depths
combination of calculation and testing.
The maximum and possibly minimum acceptable
In the safety analysis both the serviceability limit state
laying depths for a pipe shall be determined by a
and the ultimate limit state shall be considered.
load estimation in such a way that the actual design
loads are equal to the design load bearing capacity
of the pipe.
B.2.4 Finland
No text available.
effects due to the external hydrostatic pressure or to For extreme conditions, e.g. very high earth covers or
the compressive mean pressure (also called spherical sloping sides or special conditions, e.g. pipeline
component of initial soil stresses tensor) are taken into supported on piles or high internal pressures for
account. The form of the ovalization equation is similar flexible pipes, additional considerations are necessary.
to Spangler's one, but with a second additive term. Solutions are obtained for the soil pressure distribution
Moreover, the second order approach shows a on rigid and flexible pipes from which bending
non-linear result increasing with pressure, moments, axial forces, pipe deformations, strains and
asymptotically when critical buckling pressure is stresses are calculated. All parameters necessary for
reached. This enables the strains associated with this are given in tables and diagrams.
non-elliptical deformed shapes (e.g. three wave or
squaring effects) to be predicted. The analysis and its verification is made by calculating
bearing capacity, stresses, strains and deformation.
In the case of pressure pipes, the internal pressure in Additional checks are made for fatigue strength under
this model leads to an increase in system stiffness, traffic loads and for buckling.
instead of a decrease as is the case with external
pressure. The global safety factors for certain defined
probabilities of failure are associated with the
Three types of verification are to be performed: calculation model with probabilistic assumptions for
1) against instability due to buckling; the influence of the scatter of each important influence
2) ultimate limit state against failure; factor resulting from soil, installation conditions and
strength properties of the pipes.
3) serviceability limit state for durability during
intended service life. The design service life is at For the design of jacking pipes ATV-standard A161 is
least 50 years. valid.
The limit states considered are in accordance with the
general principles of Eurocode I: thus, for a given level
of safety, all materials are treated equally.
Moreover, for pressure pipes, Fascicule 71 gives the
basis for designing pressure pipes: either it refers to
standards when they exist or it gives the data for
designing those pipes when design is not covered in
standards or regulations.
--`,``,,````,,,,`,,,,`,`,,`````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
--`,``,,````,,,,`,,,,`,`,,`````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
--`,``,,````,,,,`,,,,`,`,,`````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
analysis
rigid pipe bedding factors.
Pw Working pressure
NA.2 Symbols p Projection ratio
rsd Settlement deflection ratio
Bc Outside diameter of pipe
t Pipe wall thickness
Bd Effective width of trench
Wc Soil load per unit length of pipe in narrow
Cc Soil load coefficient in embankment
trench conditions
conditions
W9c Soil load per unit length of pipe in
Cd Soil load coefficient in trench conditions
embankment or wide trench conditions
CL Soil modulus adjustment factor
Wcsu Concentrated surcharge load per unit length
Cw Water load coefficient of pipe
D Mean diameter of pipe We Total design external load per unit length of
Df Strain factor pipe
DL Deflection lag factor Wp Proof crushing strength
DLsr Lag deflection factor for semi rigid pipes Wt Crushing strength of rigid pipes (maximum
E Flexural modulus of elasticity of pipe load for concrete pipes)
material W9t Crushing strength of rigid pipes with internal
Eh Hoop tensile modulus of elasticity of pipe pressure per unit length of pipe
material Ww Equivalent external load due to weight of
E9 Overall modulus of soil reaction water in unit length of pipe
E92 Embedment soil modulus g Unit weight of soil
E93 Native soil modulus gw Unit weight of water
Fm Bedding factor D Pipe diameter change
Fs Factor of safety eb Bending strain in pipe wall
Fse Factor of safety for rigid pipe material ec Combined strain in pipe wall
(external load design) m Coefficient of friction within soil mass
Fsi Factor of safety for rigid pipe (internal m9 Coefficient of friction at trench wall
pressure design) sbs Bending stress in pipe wall
H Depth of cover to top of pipe sc Combined stress
is given by equation (2), then complete projection +5.0 Cc = 2.28 (H/Bc) 2 0.22
conditions exist, whilst if the lower value is given by
equation (3), then incomplete projection conditions NOTE. See NA.4.3 for guidance on values of rsd and p.
apply.
e2KmH/Bc 21 NA.4.1.2 Soil load Wc in narrow trench installations:
Cc = (2) Wc = CdgBd2 (4)
2Km
where
e2KmHe/Bc 21 H H
Cc = + 2 e e2KmHe/Bc (3) 1 2 e22Km9H/Bd
2Km Bc Bc Cd =
2Km9
In which He is the height of the plane of equal For pipelines in trenches, the backfill load is calculated
settlement above the top of the pipe. With Km set according to equation 1 and equation 4 and the lower
at 0.19, the values in table NA.2 are obtained for Cc. value is used for the pipeline design.
NA.4.1.3 For details of soil load in negative
projection conditions, see B.1.12.
NA.4.1.4 Concentrated surcharge load, Wcsu:
Wcsu = PsBc (5)
where the value of the surcharge pressure, Ps, is
obtained from figure NA.6, NA.7, NA.8 or NA.9.
NA.4.1.5 Equivalent load due to weight of water in The value of Km9 is taken as the lower of the values
pipe, Ww: for the backfill material, and the native soil in the
Ww = Cw¾w;(D – t)2/4 (6) trench sides.
in which the value of Cw is normally taken as 0.75. NA.4.3.2 Settlement deflection ratio
NA.4.1.6 Total design external load, We: The recommended values of the settlement deflection
We = Wc + Wcsu + Ww (7) ratio rsd and ranges for the native soil modulus E93
NOTE. Substitute W 9c for Wc for wide trench or embankment are given in table NA.4.
installations.
NA.4.2 Supporting strength of rigid pipes
The supporting strength of rigid pipes is the product Table NA.4 Recommended values for rsd
of the pipe strength and the bedding factor, and must and E93
be at least equal to the total design load calculated Foundation rsd E93
from equation 7. MN/m2
Minimum recommended bedding factor, Fm: Unyielding (e.g. rock) 1.0 >14
Fm $ WeFse/Wt (or W9t) (8)
Normal 0.5 to 0.8 3 to 14
Recommended design values of the bedding factor can
Yielding (e.g. soft ground) 0 to 0.5 <3
be obtained from table NA.7. Refer to product
standards for design values of crushing strength (Wt). NOTE. Guidance on the relationship between native soil moduli
and soil types is given in table NA.1.
NOTE 1. For pressure pipelines a reduction factor has to be
applied to the crushing strength to take account of the effect of
the internal water pressure. NA.4.3.3 Projection ratio
NOTE 2. Refer to table NA.5 for recommended values of factor of The projection ratio, p, is calculated as the proportion
safety.
of the pipe external diameter that is above firm
Crushing strength adjustment W9t for reinforced bedding level or the natural ground level. For class D,
concrete pressure pipes: F and N beddings (see table NA.7) the value of p is
W9t = Wt(1 2 Pw/Pu) (9) unity, and for other granular and concrete beddings
The working pressure Pw should not exceed: p is 0.7.
Pu(1 2 Wc/WtFm)/Fsi NOTE. In calculation, the settlement deflection and projection
ratios are used in combination, and design values of their product
Crushing strength adjustment W9t for asbestos cement (rsdp) are often taken as 0.7 for class D, N or F beddings
pressure pipes: (see table NA.7) and 0.5 for classes B and S.
W9t = Wt (1 2 Pw/Pu)0.5 (10) NA.4.3.4 Factors of safety
NOTE. The working pressure Pw should not exceed The recommended minimum values of safety factors
Pu(1 2 (Wc/WtFm)2)/Fsi. Fse and Fsi are given in table NA.5.
NA.4.3 Design data for rigid pipes
NA.4.3.1 Soil properties Table NA.5 Minimum values of Fse and Fsi
In the absence of specific data supporting the use of Pipe Fse Fsi
material
other values, it is normal practice to assume the
Non-pressure Pressure Pressure
following:
Km = 0.19 Clay 1.25 Ð Ð
Km9 = 0.13 Concrete 1.25 1.60 2.0
g = 19.6 kN/m3 DN Fsi
Where soils are more precisely identified, the values Asbestos 1.30 1.50 175 to 225 3.5
given in table NA.3 may be used. cement 250 to 500 3.0
Table NA.3 Values of Km and Km9 for specific 600 to 1000 2.5
soil types NOTE. For reinforced concrete pipes, Fse should not be less
than Wt/Wp.
Type of soil Km or Km9
Granular soils without cohesion 0.190
Maximum for sand and gravel 0.165
Saturated top soil 0.150
Maximum for ordinary clay 0.130
Maximum for saturated clay 0.110
--`,``,,````,,,,`,,,,`,`,,`````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
--`,``,,````,,,,`,,,,`,`,,`````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
NA.6.2 Supporting strength of flexible pipes NA.6.2.6 Combined stress in thermoplastics, sc:
NA.6.2.1 The modulus of soil reaction (E92) for the sc = (Pi 2 Pe) D/2t (25)
selected pipe surround material, at the chosen level of NOTE 1. The value of Pe is obtained from equation 20.
compaction, is obtained from table NA.6. Guidance on NOTE 2. Equation 25 applies to pipes buried with not less
evaluation of the corresponding modulus for the than 0.75 m cover.
native soil (E93) can be found in table NA.1, taking NA.6.2.7 Strain in GRP pipes.
account of site investigation data.
a) Bending strain in non-pressure pipes, eb:
NA.6.2.2 The effective overall modulus of soil
eb = Df(D/D) (t/D) (26)
reaction (E9) is obtained from equations 16 and 17.
where
--`,``,,````,,,,`,,,,`,`,,`````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
NOTE. If the trench width is more than 4.3 times the external
pipe diameter, the value of E9 is equal to the value of E92. (D/D) is obtained from equation 23.
NA.6.2.3 Factor of safety against buckling, Fs: b) Combined strain in pressure pipes, ec:
a) With soil support (applies in all cases): ec = Df(D/D)R(t/D) + PiD/2Eht (27)
Fs = 1/{(Pe/Pcrl) +(Ps + Pv)/Pcrs} (21) NOTE. In equation 27, the long term value of Eh should be used.
Yes
No Can required bedding factor be
obtained from standard values
(table NA.7)? Is pipe wall bending stress No
calculated from equation 19
acceptable?
Yes
Yes
Figure NA.1 Flowchart for pipeline design Figure NA.2 Flowchart for pipeline
with rigid pipes design with ductile iron pipes
--`,``,,````,,,,`,,,,`,`,,`````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Yes
Yes No No
Yes
No
Yes
Is strain calculated from Design acceptable
equation 27 acceptable?
--`,``,,````,,,,`,,,,`,`,,`````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
--`,``,,````,,,,`,,,,`,`,,`````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
NOTE. The solid line represents the preferred route. NOTE. The solid line represents the preferred route.
Figure NA.4 Flowchart for pipeline design Figure NA.5 Flowchart for pipeline design
with steel pipes with thermoplastic pipes
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
Ma
2
20
Ps , kN/m
in
ro
ad
s
10 Lig
9
8
ht
7
roa
6
ds
5
4
--`,``,,````,,,,`,,,,`,`,,`````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Fie
3
lds
2
Inclusive of relevant
impact factors
1
0,5 0,7 0,9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910
0,6 0,8 1,0
Cover depth, m
Figure NA.6 Surcharge pressure Ps due to vehicle wheels
500
2
HP: 700 kN/m tyre pressure
LP: 300 kN/m 2 tyre pressure
200
100
2
Ps , kN/m
50
30
20
20
10 10
Wheel load (tonnes)
including impact
factor
5
0,5 1 2 5 10
Cover depth, m
--`,``,,````,,,,`,,,,`,`,,`````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
200
100
M
ai
50
n
lin
e
ra
ilw
Li
ay
gh
tr
ai
20
lw
2
ay
Ps , kN/m
10
5
--`,``,,````,,,,`,,,,`,`,,`````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
2
0,5 1 2 5 10
Cover depth, m
Figure NA.8 Surcharge pressure Ps due to single track railway
10
k
k
rac
rac
ack
2 track
5t
4t
5 3 tr
Cover depth, m
,,
Y = 1/6 Bc Narrow Wide trench and embankment
trench
,,
300 Wide trench
1.1 (See ref 4, B.1.12)
D 1.1
Embankment
N
D
,,
,,
300
,,,,
Wide trench
1.1 (See ref 4, B.1.12)
N 1.1
Embankment
1.1 to 1.3 (See ref 4, B.1.12)
Y
,,
Bc
,,
300
Wide trench
1.5 (See ref 4, B.1.12)
45° F 1.5 1.9 (See ref 9. B.1.12)
,,,,,,
DN/20
Embankment
,,
,,,,,,
approx.
1.5 to 1.9 (See ref 4, B.1.12)
,,,,,, Y
,,
Bc
,,,,,,
Embankment
,,,,,,
1.9 to 2.3 (See ref 4, B.1.12)
,,,,,, Y
--`,``,,````,,,,`,,,,`,`,,`````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
,,
Dimensions in millimetres
Bedding detail Bedding class Bedding factors
Y = 1/6 Bc Narrow Wide trench and embankment
trench
,,
Bc
,,,,,,
,,,,,, Y
300 Wide trench
,,,,,,
Embankment
,,,,,,
2.2 (See ref 4, B.1.12)
,,,,,, Y
,,
,,,
11/4 B c Wide trench
Bc+ 200 min. 2.6 (See ref 4, B.1.12)
Unreinforced 2.6
,
Embankment
300 min.
2.6 to 3.7 (See ref 4, B.1.12)
120° A
Wide trench
,
3.4 (See ref 4, B.1.12)
,,
1/4 Bc Reinforced 3.4
Embankment
1/4 DN min. 3.4 to 5.7 (See ref 4, B.1.12)
,,,
--`,``,,````,,,,`,,,,`,`,,`````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
In situ
concrete ,,, Granular bedding
material
Selected backfill
material
All-in granular
material
--`,``,,````,,,,`,,,,`,`,,`````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
grained soil with less than soils, and require
12 % fines particularly close control
Class S4: Coarse grained soil when used with low
with more than 12 % fines stiffness pipes.
OR
Fine grained soil, liquid limit
less than 50 %, medium to
no plasticity and more than
25 % coarse grained
material.
Class S5: Fine grained soil, Class S5 only recommended
liquid limit less than 50 %, for use with semi-rigid
medium to no plasticity and pipes.
less than 25 % coarse
grained material
B1 and B2 Class B1: Class B embedments not
Upper surround as for recommended for use with
S3 or S4 pipes of less than 10 kN/m2
Lower surround as for stiffness.
0,7 D S1 or S2
Class B2:
Upper surround as for S5
Lower surround as for S1 or
S2
D Classes S1 to S5 Only suitable for semi-rigid
pipes with high beam
strength.
Soil properties from table
NA.6, except Kx = 0.110
NOTE 1. See Table NA.6 for design parameters for embedment classes.
permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 no extract may
be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any
means – electronic, photocopying, recording or otherwise – without prior written
BSI Group permission from BSI.
Headquarters 389 This does not preclude the free use, in the course of implementing the standard,
Chiswick High Road, of necessary details such as symbols, and size, type or grade designations. If
London, W4 4AL, UK these details are to be used for any other purpose than implementation then the
Tel +44 (0)20 8996 9001 prior written permission of BSI must be obtained.
Fax +44 (0)20 8996 7001
www.bsigroup.com/ Details and advice can be obtained from the Copyright and Licensing Manager.
standards Tel: +44 (0)20 8996 7070 Email: copyright@bsigroup.com