1 Money, Banking, and Finance - 231226 - 101619
1 Money, Banking, and Finance - 231226 - 101619
1 Money, Banking, and Finance - 231226 - 101619
Rationale
Money, Banking, and Finance
Ans : No!
The Liquidity Continuum
Liquidity Continuum
More Less
Liquid Liquid
• This bank will have loss as a result because they are paying more than they are
earning.
How Banks Create Money - 2
Singelton Bank Balance Sheet, Example 2
• Giving loan
• This bank will have Profit as a result because they are earning more than they
are paying.
How Banks Create Money - 3
First National Balance Sheet, Example 3
How Banks Create Money - 4
First National Balance Sheet, Example 4
● Now, First National Bank must hold some required reserves ($900,000) but can lend out the other amount
($8.1 million) in a loan to Jack’s Chevy Dealership.
How Banks Create Money - 5
First National Balance Sheet, Example 5
• This money creation is possible because there are multiple banks in the financial
system.
• They are required to hold only a fraction of their deposits,
• loans end up deposited in other banks,
• which increases deposits and the money supply.
• This money creation is possible because :
• Coins and currency in circulation - the coins and bills that circulate in
an economy that are not held by the U.S Treasury, at the Federal
Reserve Bank, or in bank vaults.
• Money market fund - the deposits of many investors are pooled together
and invested in a safe way like short-term government bonds.
• Certificates of Deposit (CD’s) and other time deposits - account that the
depositor has committed to leaving in the bank for a certain period of time,
in exchange for a higher rate of interest.
M2 Money
M1 Money
• All M1 Money • coins and currency
• savings deposits in circulation
• money market • checkable
funds (demand) deposit
• certificates of • traveler's checks
deposit
• other time
deposits.
Birth and Dominance
US Dollar ($)
Transaction Cambridge/
Cash balance
• Marshall’s Equation
• Robertson’s Equation
• Pigou’s Equation
Fisher’s Quantity Theory of Money or Cash
Transaction Approach. M = Qty of money
V = Velocity of money
MV = PY P = Price Level
Y = Qty of goods/services
consumed
Fisher’s Quantity Theory of Money or Cash
Transaction Approach.
Fisher’s Quantity Theory of Money or Cash
Transaction Approach.
Fisher’s Quantity Theory of Money or Cash
Transaction Approach.
The Cash transaction approach of the quantity theory of money was provided by the
American economist Irving Fisher in his book- The Purchasing Power of Money (1911).
According to Fisher, “Other things remaining unchanged, as the quantity of money in
circulation increases, the price level also increases in direct proportion and the value of
money decreases and vice versa”.
Fisher’s quantity theory is explained with the help of his famous equation of exchange:
MV = PY or P = MV/Y
Where, M – the total quantity of money of all types.
V – is the velocity of circulation of money. The product MV is the total supply of
money in a year.
Y – is the total amount of goods and services exchanged for money.
p – is the price per unit, Hence the product PY is the total value of all the
transactions for which money is used.
Money supply and Price level Diagram
Price level
P0
M0
Money Supply
Money supply and Value of money Diagram
V0
Value of
Money
M0
Money Supply
Assumptions of Fisher’s Quantity Theory:
1. Constant Velocity of Money
According to Fisher, the velocity of money (V) is constant
and is not influenced by the changes in the quantity of money.
2. Constant Volume of Trade or Transactions
Total volume of trade or transactions (T) is also assumed to
be constant and is not affected by changes in the quantity of
money.
3. Price Level is a Passive Factor
According to Fisher the price level (P) is a passive factor
which means that the price level is affected by other factors of
equation, but it does not affect them
Assumptions of Fisher’s Quantity Theory:
4. Money is a Medium of Exchange:
The quantity theory of money assumed money only as a medium of
exchange. Money facilitates the transactions.
5. Constant Relation between M and M’:
Fisher assumes a proportional relationship between currency
money (M) and bank money (M’).
6. Long Period:
The theory is based on the assumption of long period. Over a long
period of time, V and T are considered constant.
7. Full Employment:
There exist 100% employment rate in the economy.
Fisher’s equation - Extended
MV+𝑀𝑀1 𝑉𝑉 1 = 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃
The Cash-balance Approach or Cambridge
equation of exchange
The Cash–balance approach was provided by some of the economists of Cambridge University such
as Alfred Marshall, A C Pigou, D H Robertson, and J M Keynes. The equation is based on the store-
of-value function of money and cash balance held by the people to make day-to-day expenditures.
According to Cambridge economists, the value of money is determined in terms of supply and
demand.
Features:
1. According to this approach, the price level depends upon the demand for and supply of money.
Hence, the changes in the value of money are caused by either a change in the demand for or
supply of money.
2. According to the theory, the supply of money is a stock rather than a flow. It comprises of all
the cash and bank deposits.
3. The demand for money implies a demand for cash balance. Cash balance is that proportion of
the real income which the people to hold in the form of money.
4. Given the supply of money at a point of time, the value of money is determined by the demand
for cash balances.
Marshall’s Equation
M = Qty of money
k = Proportion of income people
want to hold as cash balance
P = Price Level
Y = Real Income
M = P*k*Y
M = Qty of money
Value of money
P0
M0
*a situation in which a change in one variable results in an equally proportional change in another variable.
N= PK +R𝐾𝐾 1
Where,
N –represents quantity of money in circulation.
P – the price level of consumption goods.
K – is the amount of the consumption goods which the people desire to hold.
𝐾𝐾 1 - is the amount of the consumption goods which the people hold in the form
of bank deposits.
R – is the cash reserve ratio of the banks.
In the above equation, if K is constant, a proportionate increase in N (amount of money) will
lead to a proportionate increase in price level ( P )
According to Keynes, in the short period, K 𝐾𝐾 1 and remain constant. So a change in N will cause
a direct proportionate change in P. In the long run K 𝐾𝐾 1 and R may not remain constant. So a
change in N may influence K,𝐾𝐾 1 and R.
Criticisms
Simple Truism:
The Marshall equation establishes proportionate relationship between the quantity of
money and the price level M=KPM, assuming all other factors to be constant. It does not
tell anything new.
Role of rate of interest ignored:
The cash balance theory excludes the role of rate of interest in explaining the changes in
the price level which is very important in determining the demand for money.
Ignored the speculative motive:
This approach has not properly analysed various motives for holding money. It ignored the
speculative motive for holding money which causes changes in the demand for money.
K and T assumed constant:
Fisher also assume that K and T remain constant. This is possible in a static situation. But in
dynamic conditions. So the theory is inadequate to explain the dynamic price behavior in
the economy.
Criticisms
The cash balance approach is narrow:
This approach fail to explain the purchasing power of money in terms of
capital goods. But it considered only consumption goods.
Neglects other factors:
This theory is narrow because K is also determined by factors other than
real income, such as, the price level, the monetary and business habits
and political conditions in the country.
Unitary elasticity of demand:
The Cambridge equation assumes that the elasticity demand for money is
unity. This is unrealistic assumption because the elasticity of demand
cannot be unity in the modern day in the progressive and dynamic society.
Criticisms of Quantity Theory of Money
1. Unrealistic Assumption of factors being constant:
The assumption that P is passive, V and T are constant, is highly
unrealistic. P is not passive, it affect the other elements in the equation.
Similarly V is not independent, it changes with a change in M
2. Unrealistic Assumption of Long Period:
The quantity theory of money has been criticized on the grounds that, it
provides a long-term analysis of the value of money. It throws no light on the
short-run problems. Keynes has aptly remarked that “in the long-run we are
all dead”. Actual problems are short-run problems.
3. Unrealistic Assumption of full Employment:
Keynes’ fundamental criticism of the quantity theory of money was based
upon its unrealistic assumption of full employment. Full employment is a
rare phenomenon in the actual world.
Criticisms of Quantity Theory of Money
4. Simple Truism:
The equation of exchange (MV = PT) is a mere truism and proves nothing. The equation
does not tell anything about the causal relationship between money and prices; it does not
indicate which is the cause is and which is the effect.
5. Fails to Explain Trade Cycles:
The quantity theory does not explain the cyclical fluctuations in prices. It does not tell why
during the depression the prices fall even with the increase in the quantity of money and
during the boom period the prices continue to rise at a faster rate in spite of the adoption
of tight money and credit policy.
6. One-Sided Theory:
Fisher’s transactions approach is one-sided. It takes into consideration only the supply of
money and its effects and assumes the demand for money to be constant.
7. Non Monetary Factors are excluded : Fashion / Trend / Expectations
8. Rate of Interest is Ignored: Impact of ROI on money supply